PC 08-11-75CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014
Telephone:. 252-4505
MINUTES OF'THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON AUGUST 11, 1975 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, CITY HALL
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
SALUTE TO THE FLAG
Chairman Gatto called the meeting to order. at 7:37 p�m. with the
Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Comma present; Cooper (8:46) , O'Keefe, Woodward, Chairman Gatto
Comm. absent: Adams
Staff present: Director of Public Works Viskovich
Assistant Director of:Planning Cowan
Assistant City Attorney Kilian
Associate Planner Laurin
Consultant present: D. J. Myronuk
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of Regular Meeting of July 28, 1975.
The motion at the top of page 11 should go at the bottom of page 1(
just before UNFINISHED BUSINESS.
Moved by Comm. O'Keefe, seconded by Comm. Woodward to approve the
Minutes of July 28, 1975, as corrected.
Motion carried, 3-0 j
C-202
age1
PC-202 IMINUTES OF THE AUGUST 11,.1.975 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
?'<i ge 2 1
TTEN COMMUNICATIONS
A letter has been received from Mr. Vince Garrod, of Regnart Road,
indicating he would lake to speak in regard to the Hillside Study.
a
r
7
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -- None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
t
1. Application 9-TM-75 of 14AY INVESTMENT COMPANY: TENTATIVE MAP
to divide 2.24 acres into eighteen single-family cluster units.
Said property is located southerly of the City Corporation Yard
adjacent to and westerly of Mary Avenue. First Hearing continued.
CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 8, 1975.
2. Application 4-TM-75 of LAMONT E. WILLIAMS. TENTATIVE MAP
to divide 13.4 acres into six residential, single-family lots in
City of Cupertino RI-40 (Residential, single-family, 40,000 sq. ft.
per dwelling unit) and City of C}ipertino R1-100 (Residential,
' single-family, 10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot area per dwelling unit)
zone. Said property is located at the western terminus of Lindy
Lane. Second Hearing.
;Several exhibits were placed on the bulletin board. The Assistant
Planning Director said this application was continued to permit the
'City to readvertise to allow the apI'icant to proceed on the basis of
6 lots rather than 5. He :<{plained iioar this proposal would fit into
the street loop pattern the Planni.n� CoTmnission has discussed. He
:also reviewed the tentative map prorosal and the entry grading study.
The orange area of roadway would be Cully improved; the blue would
be dedicated right-of-way only; the purple would be minimally improved;
and the green would be improved to Iri.vate driveway standards. In
most respects, the grading can be aczamplished without disturbing the
trees. One tree will be in a 6' we-]- on the one side. There is a
.chance that one or two trees may not be able to be saved. There will
be no privacy intrusion of the McLaien nor the Wall -ace properties since
the road is depressed in this area.
i
Comm. Cooper was answered that one A" oak at the entrance is in
.jeopardy. The area contains three A", two 24" and one 18" oaks.
i
The Assistant Planning Director answered Chairman Gatto that the intent
of the proposed landscaping condition suggested by the staff would
provide erosion control. The Director of Public Works added that the
soils engineer would have reconmiend:Lt:ions to make on this.
19
U
MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 11, 1975 PLANNING COMMISSION r1EETING
Mr. Lamont Williams, the applicant, said it is his intent to-do
everything possible to save the trees. It is his belief that they;
can all be saved. It is to his interest as well as to everybody
else to provide erosion control in the cut and fill area.
Mr, John Riley, Civil Engineer, P.O. Box 111, Los Altos, explained 11
the bench.approach he plans to use to soften the effect of the
cut and. fill.. He said the plantings on the benches will intercept;
the erosion. The street trees will be installed on these benches,;
as well as erosion control plantings. This will all be planted
before the homes are occupied. He said the native plants won't
have to be irrigated if planted at the right time. It is his plan;
to put in the right materials at the right time of the year.
Chairman Gatto suggested including bonding of installation and
maintenance of erosion control plant material.
The Assistant Planning Director answered Comm. 04Keefe that it is
the intent of Condition 24 to be in conjunction with Condition 22.
After discussion, it was decided to combine these two conditions.
Mr. Williams answered Comm. Cooper that an irrigation system on a
slope such as this could very easily start rivulets that become
larger with the rain. Large masses of water can cause problems.
Mr. Williams suggested the flattening out of the lower portion of
the road near the threatened oak and making the road a little
steeper farther up (maintaining the 15% grade). This would give
the tree a better chance.
There was a lengthy discussion on water service for this property.
The City`s position, as explained by the Director .of Public Works,
is that it is a City policy that any property annexing to the City
of Cupertino is obligated to use City water service. In this
case, Reglan water would pass through City pipes and meters.
Mr. Ellis Jacobs, 22051 Regnart Road, speaking on behalf of Reglan
Water Company President Childress, said that at the present time
Mr, Lamont Williams owns 5 water meters and is on the Reglan main
water. line. All assessments have been paid up to date. One of
the basic concepts of this water company is to serve individual
lots. They are a nonprofit mutual water company and there is no
way, legally, they can sell water to. the Cite of Cupertino. He
said Cupertino already does -not own many of the water lines in the
City.
Mr. Williams said, from where he stands, Reglan has the obligation
to serve his lots. He would like to develop to City standards.
He felt this problem wasbetween Reglan and the City.
?C-202
?age 3
'C--202
4
MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 1.1, 1975 PLAN.�iN,,G CO.IMTSSION MEETING
She Director of Public Works pointed out that the entire planning by
;the City is based on water_ and other services. He felt it was very
!important to retain Condition 16.
'The Assistant City Attorney advised, from a procedural point of view,
to keep Condition 1.8 for the present time. He suggested a minute
order to the City Council requesting they direct the City Attorney's
Office to work out with engineering a plan that could avoid this
problem.
Ms. Juanita McLaren, 22101 Lindy Lane, said somebody hasn't done their
;homework. She has watched this water system develop over the years.
,She has asked the City for water service but hasn't received it as yet.
She thinks the City i.s pushing too hard in this case. Her other
.concern is where the lights are goinz, tc be placed. She would also
like to have the existing street_ ligi-,t that shines directly into
her pool and patio area lowered in intensity.
The Director of Public Works stated that the City Council has thoroughly
discussed lighting in the foothills. It was determined that safety
'lighting is a prime concern. Therefore, there should be lighting at
intersections.
'For clarity, it was decided the word "above" on line 11 of Condition 16
should be deleted and replaced with "beyond this development".
Mr. Dennis Paboojian, 10328 Cold Harbor., Cupertino, said he purchased
the lower half of the Wallace properly 1-1!2 years ago. When he
purchased the property it had no wat -r and he wanted to get water through
San Jose Water Works or through Cupc:'tfno. He made a deal with Reglan
and purchased shares in the water cc!np, T.iy. He asked if the City will
provide water to him when he builds on his property.
The Assistant City Attorney stated the :issue here is that even though
Reglan water will be used, the City wiLI own the pipes and will control
the size of these pipes. These pinE:;1:a.ill eventually serve the
properties in the hills above.
The Director of Public Works answerc�! Comm. Woodward that if the City
.installs the lines they will also mzinr..ain them. Some agreement will
have to be made with Reglan.
Mr. Paboojian asked what impact wilt be realized on the adjacent hillsides
by the street standards imposed on the t�Till.iams property. The Director
of Public Works said this depends ul on the density proposed.
'Mr. Paboojian was told he will be nctiied in the future of any public
;hearings of this property.
Moved by Comm. O`Keefe, seconded by Corr.!:i. Woodward to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried, 4-0
r
MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 11, 1975 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING IPC-202
Page 5
Moved by Comm, Woodward, seconded by Comm. Cooper to recommend to ?4-TM-75
the City Council approval of application 4-TM-75 with the 14 Iapproved
standard conditions., conditions 15 through 26 as enumerated in the!
July 11, 1975 staff report, including the change to condition 16
made at this meeting and the new version of condition 18 passed
out by the staff at this meetingg dated August 11; 1975.`Alsog
with the modification that conditions 22 and 24 are combined
and condition 20 modified to indicate low intensity lighting at
intersections only.
AYES- Comm.. Cooper, Woodward, Chairman Gatto
NOES,, Comm. O'Keefe
ABSENT, Comm. Adams
- Motion carried, 3-1
Chairman Gatto called a recess at 9013 p.m. The meeting recon-
vened at 9 -30 pm.
3..
f
Application 2-Z-75. of JOSEPH F. BROWN:- AMENDMENT TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT ZONING APPLICATION 2-Z•-75 to incorporate 1.48 acres
into said zoning district and to revise the approved site plan
for said zoning district by adjusting the location of a public;
street. The specific zoning request is to rezone 0.542'acres
from P (Planned Development with industrial intent) to P
(Planned Development with commercial intent), 0.545 acres from!'
P (Planned Development with industrial intent) to P (Planned
Development with commercial intent) , 1.28 acres from ML
(Industrial) to P (Planned Development with industrial intent);
0.267 acres from P (Planned Development with commercial intent):
to P (Planned Development with industrial intent), or whatever`
zone may be deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission.
Said pro eerty is located northerly of the intersection of
Lazaneo Drive and Bandley Drive on the easterly and westerly
sides of Bandley Drive extending northerly for'a distance of
approximately 1100 feet. First hearing. t
The Assistant Planning Director stated that approximately two
months ago the City Council approved Dr. Brown's proposal. An
amendment is being proposed at this time to add 1.2 acres to this
plan and to shift the location of the as yet unnamed public street
to a common property line between the Brown holdings and the
Cupertino Nursery property. He pointed out the proposal on an
exhibit on the bulletin board. Previously, a portion of "D" was
not zoned. It was determined that property could not be -sub-
divided unless it was consistent with the General Plan and Zoning
Map. j
C-202 MINUTES OF TIE AUGUST 11, 1975 PLANN;.NG CM!clUSSION MEETING
+' i :e 6
The Assistant Planning Director stated that one of the key features of
the City Plan for that area is the F i.vate accessway shall be. provided
from Lazaneo to the yetunamed pub]is street. Althouuh it is too soon
to pin down location of the bui.ldinf,s on the site, the City would lake
to definitely establish the street. F!tnn. Ile reviewed the staff's
recommended conditions. Condition 22 :hould make it clear that the
developer must revise Exhibit B (wr:.c :::hner:t) before this proposal goes
to the City Council, to reflect a 24' i,ide minimum private drive
connecting Lazaneo Drive to the new :,treet.
Dr. Joe Brown, 20985 Pepper.tree Lanc, Cupertino, said the only reason
he is back at this time is that the )uyer. for D1 and D2 needs the
additional land in order to construct `he buildings he needs. 'Therefore,
parcel F needs to be rezoned. Ile wa,}t,�d to discuss the proposed
conditions of approval-.
Dr. Brown wanted to know at what point the building is going to be
allowed to be constructed. lie asked that "time limit of one year and
if it is legal" added to Condition 25.
The Director of Public Works stated th,_ maintenance district would start
with the first development of the piojoct.
As to Condition 26, Dr. Brown said that for some reason, parking in
the rear does not caork well, accord:iiag, to Mr. Cali, who has had some
experience in this area.
In response to another question, the Director of. Public Works, answered
Dr. Brown that the cost of the traft.ic signals is spread over the
properties involved.
Dr. Brown said he provided for a 70' street on Bandley .Drive through
his property. This was predicated cn commercial zoning. Now it is
only industrial zoning; so it would to advantageous to eliminate the
median strip along Bandley Drive. Industrial developers have told
Dr. Brown that they would like to sfe at least a 70' street for ease
in maneuvering large trucks. Chairr:an Gatto agreed with this reasoning.
Discussion followed.
The Assistant Planning Director saic' the staff needs to know whether or
not the interior street should be p'..iced tni.dway between Stevens Creek
Blvd. and Greenleaf Drive and whetht�c or not it should serve as a
"front door" to Saratoga-Sunnyva]_e :I'lo ld. Chairman Gatto suggested
another road through there might be of benei:it to the City sometime
in the future.
.Comm. Woodward wondered about the p,-ss:ibil.ity of other properties
along Saratoga --Sunnyvale Road wishi,:, to;o industrial rather than
commerciaL. Dr.. Brocrn said the co:-,;. oL- the property does not warrant
.commercial zoning.
r
MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 11, 1.97 S PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
1'C-202
'Page 7
Comm. Cooper moved, seconded by Comm O'Keefe, to require a privatel-Private drive
drive along the blue line that runs along the easterly portion of
along Parcel E
parcel Ea After a considerable discussion, the consensus was there:
would be no parking along the 30' street.
The Assistant City Attorney answered Comm. O'Keefe that restric-
tions as to time of delivery can be made on the basis of healthy
safety and welfare. Comm. O'Keefe said the crux of the matter is
f
to minimize the number of curb cuts along Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road.
s
It looks as though the internal street does serve a purpose and
helps accomplish this.
AYES. Comm. Cooper, O'Keefe, Woodward, Chairman Gatto
NOES, None
ABSENT. Comm. Adams
f
Motion carried,1 4-0
Comm. Cooper made a motion that the 30` street should permit back
i
up parking. There was no second to this motion.
.
Moiled by Comm, Cooper, seconded by Comm. Woodward that the 30
internal street shall have no back up parking.
;
AYES. Comm, Cooper, Woodward
f
NOES. Comm. O'Keefe, Chairman Gatto
Motion tied 2-2
Moved by Comm. O'Keefe, seconded by Comm. Woodward that the
j
internal street shall have no parking back up into it.
AYES. Comm. O'Keefe, Woodward
NOES. Comm. Cooper, Chairman Gatto
#
Motion. tied 2,-2
it was then decided to leave the street design, to be resolved as
the applications for development come in.
6
It;- 2U"2 MINUTES 01? THE AUGUST 11, 19/5 PLFLN ,1NG COr2,1ISSLON MEETING
Following .is new wording for Conditf.on 22 as recommended by the Assistant
City Attorney: Condition 22: "The applicant shall revise Exhibit B
First Revision to reflect a private drive connecting Lazaneo Drive with
'proposed new street. The private dr:ive shall be contiguous to and
parallel with the easterly boundar. Line of sites D1, D2 and E.
The private drive shall have, a mi.irir111m l,!i.dth of 20' on the applicant's
property so as to provide 2 [.rave(. i :nes. Additional pavement width
may be required on the properties esterl.y of the zoning boundary and
site F dependent upon the final dr_i_,:-e+,,ay design configuration which will
be determined in conjunction with t ,e initial use permit application
involving a property contiguous to :aid private drive. It is intended
that all property owners having acc:ss to said private drive grant
cross easements for joint accesses in Location designated by the City
when said property owliers develop.
Chairman Gatto asked for comments f :om the audience.
Mr, Itsu Uenaka; Cupertino Nursery, w%Tanted it to be on the record that
he has no objection to the now. strei_.t. He answered Chairman Gatto
that he would rather be along Saratoga. -Sunnyvale. Road, but he would
rather be on a side street than on no st:r.ect at all He would like to
keep that option opezr as Long as po 3s-.ble. Chairman Gatto said that
until he conies in with a developmen': plan, tli=it option is open.
Moved by Comm. O'Keefe, seconded by Comm. Cooper to close the
public hearing.
Motion clarried, 4-0
The Assistant Planning Director answered Comm. Woodward that the
original plan was based on setbacks established by the Architectural
and Site Approval Committee's g;uidc.ines for Sara tot,a-Sunnyvale Road.
Comm. Woodward was concerned about et:ting specific distances on
the zoning. The Assistant City Att,.rrrey suggested saying approximately
25' or average 25'.
Chairman Gatto would lake to hold i a:beyance the question of median
strip along Bandley Drive.
MINUTES OF THE.AUGUST 11,.1975 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
C--202
age 9
Moved by Comma Cooper, seconded by Comm. Woodward, to recommend '2-Z--75
approval of application 2-Z-75 with the 14.standard conditions, 'approved
conditions 15 through 26 as noted in the August 7, 1975 memo and j
amended at this meeting, and the addition of condition. 27.
Condition 15, add "first revision" on first- line after "B".
Condition 19, line 2, delete "Highway".
Condition 20, line 4, delete "Highway 9 Conceptual Plan".
Condition 21, line 4, delete "177,530", and replace with `'186,800"e
Condition 222 worded as in first paragraph of page 8, thesse minutes
Condition 25, add new sentence after first sentence: "Said district
shall be initiated upon actual development of any property having
frontage on Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road."
Condition.. 27 4 "The width of the landscaped setbacks shown on
Exhibit B First Revision shall be considered as average width."
s
Y
AYES-, Comm. Cooper, O'Keefe, Woodward, Chairman Gatto
NOES a None P
ABSENT: Comm. Adams
Motion carried, 4--0
4 Application 7 U-75 -- CONTINUED TO AUGUST 25,'1975a
5. Application ll-Z-=75 of CITY OF CUPERTINO: REZONING AND
PREZONING 25.5 acres from various City and County zoning
districts to zoning districts which are consistent with the
adopted General Plan, The 25.5 acres are generally located
in an area bounded by Hillcrest Road and Crescent Road to
the north, Stevens Creek to the east, Stevens Creek Blvd- to
the south, aril Foothill Blvd. to the west. First Hearing.
The Assistant Planning Director stated the City initiated zoning
in. order to make the zoning map consistent with the General Plan,
which is State Law. This proposal concerns approximately 70
parcels in the City and the County, Letters have been received
in regard to some of the properties involved. He stressed the
fact that the .reason for these rezonings is to speed up any
future development, not to. try to get them to annexes There are
some horses in the area and they could remain as a nonconforming
use.
Mr. Bernard Ponseggi, 22350 Cupertino Road, complimented the staff
on doing some good planning. He would like to see this plan
approved.
PC_-202
;.3g2 10
1.1-Z-75
r pir. oved
INUTES OF THE AUGUST 11, 1975 PLAN T_NG C0''IMISSION MEETING
Mr. Louis Stocklmeir, 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd.,, said the commercial.
Jot at the intersection of Stevens Creek Blvd. and Cupertino Road was
Eof particul-ar interest to him. Thi; was of key importance to the City
;of Cupertino when it was grasping a _ than air, and San. Jose was trying
to get the Kaiser property. Mr. Stocklmeir said he was approached by
ja Committee to annex, to the City of Cupertino, sometime between 1940
;and 1945. With the aid of his property, they were able block the
:San Jose annexation in this area. i'his commercial zoning was worked
;out in consideration of his annexim all_ his property into the City
of Cupertino. He also wanted to kn(;;a the status of his two lots the
'City wants to put into R1-10 category even though they are less than
10,000 sq. ft. Chairman Gatto answered that any parcel of record
:existing at the present time would l)e allowed to develop as a single
(family lot, even though it is less �.hai 10,000 sq. ft. in size.
i
'Mr. Stocklmeir asked what chance he has today of retaining his commercial
and apartment zoning. He said this would be a good location for a small,
2-story office building on the coi-mmerc:ial_ and parking on the apartment
zoned property. Chairman GatLo answered that at this point, chances
were very slim that this would rece:.ve approval. Air. Stocklmeir
:pointed out that this could act as e: buffer for adjacent residential.
:Residential would noc be desirable on this busy street. Chairman
Gatto said there is much more conti::ui.'_:y if those properties take on
the same zoning as the adjacent pro -,=ties.
,The Assistant City Attorney advised that it is a legal requirement to
;allow development of that property :n some manner. It is noted in the
Ordinance that those properties Ies, than 10,000 sq. ft. will. be
allowed to develop even though zones: R1-10.
Mr. Stocklmeir noted that he has already lost $25,000 to $40,000 and
now, with this rezoning, tie will be losing another $35,000 to $40,000.
.He stated he has not received reciprocity from the City.
:Mr. Ray Cornelius, President of the Board of Sunnyview rumor, stated
he was happy to hear the staff reco:,.7cnds BQ instead of RI-10 for. that
"parc_el adjacent to Sunnyview Manor lecause this fits into their plans
,for expansion.
:Moved by Comm. Woodward, seconded b} Comm. Cooper to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried, 4-0
Moved by Comm. Woodward, seconded b% Comm. Cooper to recommend to the
City Council approval of application 11.--Z-75 in accordance with the
staff recommendation.
'AYES: Comm. Cooper, O'Keefe, WooC.. turd , Chairman Gat to
NOES : None
ABSENT : Comm. Adams
Motion carried, 4-0
i
i
MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 11, 1975 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
6. CITY OF CUPERTINO: Public Hearing to consider 1973
Comprehensive General Plan.
(a) Hillsides
The Associate Planner explained the slope/density formula once
again,
Chairman Gatto askedfor comments from the audience on the final
appendix to the Hillsides Element.
Mr, Don Myronuk, 1407 Bryant Avenue, San Jose, reviewed his
August 1, 1975 "Air Quality" report and July 14, 1975 "Energy
Report",
Mr, Myronuk answered Comm Cooper that some of the energy saving
suggestions have been utilized.. Solar energy is a possibility
but as yet, no program: has been established. Manufacturers of
insulation say that over a period of time, it will pay for itself o
There will probably be added incentive for the potential purchaser
to buy a home with energy saving methods. As to retrofit, there
are cost -benefit ratios right now; e.g., storm windows, if used
in this area, would show immediate energy saving. Right now,
these things are all voluntary. Legally, there is a minimum
requirement. The City of Davis has staff members collecting data
on solar energy.. Much legislation is forthcoming.
Mr, Myronuk recommended from the Planning Commission to the
builders -- to the buyers, that there be an .open source of infor-
mation on energy saving methods.
Chairman Gatto would like to incorporate into the document any
recent State legislation on energy saving methods.
As to air quality, Mr. Myronuk said we have to look more closely
into our driving habits. Reducing miles travelled throughout the
Bay Area can mitigate the problems This must be on a regional
basis in order to be effective.
The question was raised whether we will be more reluctant to
develop the hills because of the energy and air quality problems.
Mr. Myronuk said once people are aware of the problems, the ones
living in the hills will be more energy saving conscious. Their
trips will be better planned: and consolidated. He. does not
recommend residential units in close proximity to busy intersec-
i
t
i
i
PC-202
Wage 11
dra l t
Y
_ .' ; 5
'M[NI TES OI'' Tlk,, AU(;I,i,)T 1.1, 1.975 PLAN',i[NG CO.i:1J_SSLOii P11a�:C.Ci1C1
!MC. V111CC C<lrrod) 2260'0 1•It:. F,�lell Ro:!.l, Sarrltoga, said he concurs with
i
the prus;Cilul ::IS T)1,'1nilcd but:d. i.sa ree.� l: _i.til the Inaj1 . lie I:vu i_d l_ ike
to 11<1VC hl:; 111_!.1s1d.i„� Co11:-�7.(l(_'1:cd Lh,, ;i:i[i1C? as tile. ot11C'_rs. 11 h_1S no
in;r,le�l.i�lte dc'.vrl��l+!,loot- pla11r3 but '.01111 1.ike to hL1Ve the.i_r ol)tions left
i ,
'opEtll. The /1.:i:ii itutl J. ;inninl, D1.roci:oi: Sala the 1)C0j)01:t12' iS C:tlrrently
;; 1 f :' o �,i " 1r
L1111C:.r tle3 t'v.1111_a 1So11 hC't l, tll'. ��rU LI: t � lu Clll`I:eiltl_J hCill,,
USCA Lis pri-vate rf'Crcat i.on use. Ttli' tita.t.f Iec:1s it should coat l_nue
tills tlse, it is uaing cmni '.CICred 1J',' L[ie t\cgi-oo:1�_ "zirl District.
`Chatrmau G:.tto clul?, riune:_i Jf t1_le Gun: rat Pk-m calls this. rtlra]_ re.s.ldential
and It l.S t)P1!l u. CCi a.`.i hC1.V3te rCIC i_'.t C.na.l , S:'Ol.l� Li: 1)+3 lI1C(` i:iicitent
,l.th Llie Director S l ic't �t c. ould
r' , 1 r7 , (' � n
bt.. consider-.l a no.u�c. r.l ori�.inr, use. Cci.!:1. t•:f�,��l�.:�:Ird cou. ct sc 1. no re,_Ison
to cescr ict this pro _,.-Ly to parlL Il:ih. The conof tl!'US Wa.S to C11(111-e-
t-hls to rural. reside[lt.i.a.l_.
i �loV End by CO `;[l. 1'�_%J,:�1;:3::d , sE?C012taElil b., GO:.iT-1. T KE'(`E? t0 Sc'G'l l liE? .%l_l US c� �
1973 draft oL rXh1.'t)_Lt C •) to the EA, the
Ch In ;2:5 Il1aCle aL tills Fleet Ln�;.
ltril carrieJ
'toV"_l 1)s,T GO' ..'.I. O T7_ c?CLL�, iCCondcd ')v Cox-,,H.l';�)."`CIF. it cl to coat Inlle tlic
oIl ih:_ 1ii1 1_s.<'_e:i tv I rust: 2.5, 1975.
,t, Ctl.oil cari_med, 4-0
TJILI _[i;-Cs1Ti:1) 3US II;SS . �,'otic
iEt`1 L'TJS TRESS . N'on(a
.Ep O 1' 0L" P %_Ir Ld1N,v CK. >-Ct)N, . =;on
f
Z PO>�'I.' ():`.' PLIV �`I'iU L` I1 F(I T OR . Nc-)ne
1DJOU1R ,` MNT
i
i
Chajrinan Gatto adjcurrled this nieet fZ, at 12:41 a.m.
ATTEST:
/s/ Wt. E. Ryder
City Cleric
AP '-'RGVED :
/s l John 11. Gatto
Ch-tir•man