Loading...
Oct-27-58A resident of.Silverado...claimed that the lot sizes should be 10,,000 sq feet in keeping with the present street and added that the additional easement on the east is (,curpensated by the, withdrawal of the drainage ditch on -he north property line. MrFlerrling offered 9 as a possible alternat.. ve a real of the lots, reducing the depth of the. sites at the east end and increasing their width plus giving an additional couple of feet: to the lots facing north and south, The street pattern was again Iconsidered since subdivisions are now proposed on three.,sides of Silverado Avenue. In response to a questions MPa Fleming sa �_c! that Flood. Control might give financial aid for' the bridge crossing the ditch® Eventually - he said, a pipe line will cross Linder Highway 9 near the Bollinger corner and the Silverado ditch could then be replaced with such,,a pipe 1), Dick Yee and Fia ��h E. Weavers Applicationto rezone about 6 acres f rom o R-2.0 duplex l®t s located, just south of current development. First hearing, The 84000 sq. foot lots requested -for this unit do not meet requirements of Ordinance Noa 40. Aside from the lot size, Mr, Rodrigues and MrQ Myers, could' see no objection to the use itself. V UNFINISIJEB BUSINESS As Quinn, Subdivision � 11 acres north side of Boll�ngero George Rerkins 9 speaking for the Quinn Subdivision, asked the Commission to reconsider their decision, Mr.. Quinn on examining the situation feels that ' an excessive number of lots will be lust by increasing the size to &,000 sq.. feet, Bm H.e n` of Old Cta ertino School Site Protests and/or !I - discussion. o Not considered OBethel Lutheran Church< Application- for variance to use shake roof Myers report, Not considered D© Oliver'Rouasseau _Organiza pion a Bequest for variance to allow a. l5 foot' front setback resulting from curved driveway, Tots enumerated on diagram. Not considered E© Miscellaneous None VI NEW BUSINESS 11- Si ���.. �rmit for Rousseau9 s Idlewild Subdiv" s V east side of Highway 90 Mr, Myers said that the sign would: not qualify under the proposed ordinance. but neither wouhd most of the; signs already standing. For this re so the Commissioners in attendance favor the, Issuance of a sign permit, subject to agreement by tYie Chairmanrher VTI