PC 02-25-02City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
AGENDA OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
City Council Chambers
February 25, 2002, 6:45 p.m.
ORDER OF BUSINESS
SALUTE TO THE FLAG
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. January 28, 2002
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
POSTPONEMENTS/REMOVAL FROM CALENDAR
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Reserved for persons wishing to address the
Commission on issues which are not already included in the regular Order of
Business)
CONSENT CALENDAR
PUBLIC HEARING
OLD BUSINESS
2. General Plan study session regarding the Environmental Resources Element
NEW BUSINESS
REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Environmental Review Committee
Housing Committee
Mayor's Breakfast
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Planning Commission Agenda of February 25, 2002
Page -2
DISCUSSION OF NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
ADJOURNMENT
If you challenge the action of the Planning Commission in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in
this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Cupertino at, or prior
to, the public hearing. Please note that Planning Commission policy is to allow an
applicant and groups to speak for 10 minutes and individuals to speak for 3 minutes.
G:Planning/ Agenda2-25-02
PRA and Therese Smith:
Attached is the revised park acreage based on just the school lease acreage. For some
reason the strike-throughs on my computer version of this page turned into underlines on
the printed version, so read them as strike-throughs. The number on the right is the new
number, and school sites without leases are not counted.
I am attaching an old report that shows that several school sites without leases were
purposefully counted in the ratio in the current General Plan. So, I thinic where we are is
to make a decision/recommendation on what we should count now, regardless of how
these numbers were reached before.
Ciddy Wordell
1/4/02
NAME
TOT LOT
ACRES
NEIGHBOR-
HOOD ACRES
COMMUNITY
ACRES
SCHOOL
ACRES
c e an
Ranch
18.7
Blackberry
Farm
33*
Memorial
Sports enter
6.2
Linda ista
Varian
6.3
onta Vista
6.2
Somerset
Square
Jollyman
12
Wilson
ree si e
13
Portal
Three s
Hoover
Library Field
Oak a ey
.94
onta Vista
HS
10*
envie y r.
Lincoln Elem.
3,29 3.02
egnart em.
Stevens Creek
Elem.
Homestead
Garden Gate
Elem.
aria Elem.
Eaton Elem.
5-983.86
Cupertino HS
10*
Hyde Jr. HS
e gewlc
Elem.
Collins Elem.
Portal em.
TOTAL BY
PARK TYPE
.94
52.7
81.85 29.89 --
TOTAL ALL
TYPES
310 49--158.52
TiNot incluaea in parK ratio Kevisea 1/4/U2
UPLANNING/GENPLAN/PARK ACREAGE
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 252-4505
To: Mayor and Menbers of City Council
From: Planning Department Staff
Date: July i, 1992
I. SOME=
The qpecif is subject for this agenda, as.. m,; ng 'Theme I is =npleted on
July 6, is: Theme II: Neighborhood Quality
The :major ccuponents of neighborhood duality are the parks and
recreation program (including open space) and neighborhood protection.
A. Parks
1. park Sites, arra Ratios
The ;arks designation is applied to neighborhood and unity wide
Parks. 'Dere are ten neighborhood parks and three ccnmunitywide
parks, which are Memorial park, which includes the sports Center,
McClel.lan Ranch Park and Blackberry Farm Golf Course. The
neighborhood parks Program goal is to provide 3 acres of parks per
1,000 population. This is based on the National. Recreational and Park
Association national standard. Parks and schools which have
recreation areas secured by joint agreements, as well as Sedgwick,
Monta Vista arra Cupertino High School grounds, are included in the
ratio. A 25 year agreement exists with the Cupertino School District
for use of school district land for recreational purposes. The
agreene t includes the use of eight schools. in return Cupertino will
perform maintenance and scheduling for after school sports and
recreation. Portal and Collins schools are not included in the
agreement due to the School District's interest in maintaining them in
a res s`ve status. Blackberry Farm Golf Course is not included in the
parks/population ratio since it is a limited -purpose facility.
Ew±: Nit 1 is a map of the park and school locations. E�ibit 2 is a
list of parks and schools by neighborhood.
2. Park. Needs Assessment
EO-iblt 3 is an assessment of 1990 park needs by neighborhood. The
a..ssesmnent indicates that there is a park needs ratio of 4.13 acres
Per 1.;200 residents citywide which exceeds the policy of 3 acres per
1000 population. However, ratios in some individual neighborhoods are
not. w.t.
City Council Neighborhood Quality July 7, 1992
Page -2-
3. Park Access
The General Plan states that the City should ensure that "Each
household is within a half mile walk of the park and that the route is
reasonably free of physical barriers including streets with heavy
traffic." These physical barriers include land forms; railroad
tracks, streambeds, and of course major streets. Major streets are
included because they discourage some people, especially young
children,. from visiting parks. Exhibit 4 demonstrates the half mile
radius around each park and school, recognizing physical barriers.
The previous General Plan indicated radii only for parks; schools have
been added in recognition that they serve as neighborhood resources
for active recreation. Also, this radius map includes barriers not
utilized in the previous General Plan, so accessibility is more
conservatively evaluated in this version.
The radius map indicates that neighborhoods N, A-1, C, 0, F-1, F-2,
Irl, Lr2, and M are deficient in access to parks and school yards.
Perhaps the most important of these are A-1, O, Ir1, and Lr -2 because
they consist of existing residential neighborhoods. Further
examination of just the park radii indicate additional
inaccessibility.
4. Park Funding
The current park bond funding obligations are:
- $5 million for Wilson Park, due to 2009
- $9,070 million for the tennis center, due to 2010 Farm due
- $32,970 million for Fremont/Older school aryl Blackberry
to 2016.
Another source of funding is the park dedication fee. Current Council
policy uses these funds to retire debt service and reimburse the
General Fund for previous improvements.
Currently the City has two identified future park purchases: the
Stocklmeier property located adjacent to Stevens Creek Boulevard and
potential high school sites, both of which are unsche&led park
purchases in the Capital lmpravement Program. They will remain so
until the properties are available for purchase. The three high
schools in Cupertino — Monta Vista, 04>ertino, arra Hmestead -- are
possible sites for purrhase if the Fremont Union High School District
sells them in the future, although they have no plans to do so.
Homestead High may be an unlikely candidate for purchase since it is
on the fringe of the city limits which reduces its accessibility to
the maximum number of Cupertino residents. Should these or other park
opportunities arise, no existing funding mechanism exists for
purchase. Other methods would need to be identified.
City Council Neighborhood Quality July 7, 1992
Page -3-
5. Other Parks and Recreational Resources
The City's parks are complemented by Santa Clara County and
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District parks and preserves, as
shown on Exhibit 5. These parks ring Cupertino's western foothills
and ridgelines. They serve as Cupertino and regional resources for
hiking, biking, nature appreciation and other recreational activities.
6. Future Park Needs and Plans
Three types of park needs are identified for the future: neighborhood
parks, trail connections and recreational facilities.
a. Neighborhood parks
The neighborhood park system is considered nearly complete. The
remaining property identified for park purchase (unprogrammed in the
Capital ITproveme-nt Program) is the 4.9 acre Stocklmeier property,
which is considered for open space, not neighborhood park, purposes.
However, the 3 acres/1,000 population ratio is rnded for
continuance, to be applied in neighborhoods where potential park
acreage exists for either existing of future residents. The proposed
neighborhood parks are:
Neighborhood N: provide a public neighborhood park based upon the
City's park dedication ordinance, should new development be approved
in that neighborhood. Subsequently redraw the boundaries of
neighborhoods N and E1 to reflect the additional site.
Neighborhoods J-1, J-2, K: make the final determination regarding a
neighborhood park site after the completion of the Sedgewick School
master plan. [The master plan is now complete; there will not be a
neighborhood park at the school. Therefore, a different neighborhood
park site will need to be determined.]
Non-residential areas where new residential development is proposed:
provide active, public park space where feasible
A mi n i mt m, park size of less than 3.5 acres may be considered according
to a list of priorities, which is based on existing access to parks
and schools
b. Trail connections
Trail connections are sought within the City and the region. The
Potential inter -city linkages are shown on Exhibit 6. The Calabazas
Creek Trail, for example, would link residential areas with job
centers. Inter -city trails could also link regional trails. They
will be studied for feasibility and future implementation. The
Proposed regional connections are shown on Exhibit 5. Greenbelt
linkages between Rancho San Antonio County Park and Stevens Creek
Park, and between Stevens Creek Park and Upper Stevens Creek Park are
proposed. The connection between the proposed Bay to Ridge Trails
could 90 through Cupertino, as shown in Exhibit 7.
City Council Neighborhood Quality July 7, 1992
Page -4-
c. Recreational facilities
The Parks - and Recreation Ccumdssion reccmends that a future
recreational facility, such as a gymnasium or swimning Fool, be
considered. The Camiissicn's recomendation is:
,,he City of Cupertino recognizes the public benefit derived from a
recreational gymnasium and sw umin� pool and should such a facility be
developed, the City shall pursue all possible partnerships, including
school districts, non-profit organizations and the corporate unity
as a means of funding and operating the facilities.
The proposed Oral Plan policies address the impacts of both
non-residential and residential development on existing
neighborhoods. The excerpts below are frcm pages 10 and 15 of the
Planning comission's General Plan relations.
1. Strategy: Heart of the City Specific Plan. The objective of the
Heart of the City Specific Plan is to create a positive and
memorable gathering place for Cupertino citizens. To accomplish
this task, the plan should include the following elements:....
Design guidelines for the streetscape and new development that
orient buildings toward Stevens Creek Boulevard in order to
strengthen the Boulevard's identity and create a sense of
arrival. 'Ihe guidelines should foster pedestrian activity in
appropriate areas. Mie guidelines should address neighborhood
protection from noise, light and other intrusions on privacy.
2. Protect residential neighborhoods from noise, traffic, light and
visually intrusive effects from more intense developments with
adequate buffering setbacks, landscaping, walls, activity
limitations, site design and other appropriate measures.
Strategies....
Staff shall work with the Planning Cmnission to develop
additional residential zoning and subdivision controls to protect
neighborhood character from incompatible new residential
construction. Possible tools include height limitations and an
indexed floor area ratio.
In addition, there are existing General Plan policies that address
other neighborhood protection concerns, such as through traffic,
reducing apparent size of buildings, privacy, and security.
City Council Neighborhood Quality July 7, 1992
Page -5-
.��, •r ,�J• tr.
.. •� I� • ate• an •
1. Maintain the 3 acres/1000 population ratio.
2. Maintain the goal of providing a 1/2 mile park access radius.
3. Provide a public neighborhood park in Neighborhood N based upon
the City's park dedication arriinance, should new development be
approved in that neighborhood.
4. Determine the park strategy in Neighborhoods J-1, J-2, K.
5. Provide active, public park space in non-residential areas where
new residential development is proms, where feasible.
6. Consider a minimum, park size of less than 3.5 acres according to
a list of priorities, which is based on existing access to parks
and schools.
7. Create a trail plan after performing a study.
8. Consider a future recreational facility, such as a gymnasium or
swimming pool, since the neighborhood park program is nearly
complete and since a parks needs assessment indicated that a
facility is desired.
1. Prepare guidelines for the "Heart of the City" specific plan
which address neighborhood" protection .from noise, light and
other intrusions on privacy. (This policy may be deferred until
the City Identity 'Il-iene is discussed.)
2. Protect residential neighborhoods from noise, traffic, light and
visually intrusive effects from more intense developments with
adequate buffering setbacks, landscaping, walls,, activity
limitations, site design and other appropriate measures.'
3. Develop additional residential and subdivision controls to
protect neighborhood character from incompatible new residential
construction. Possible tools include height limitations and an
indexed floor area ratio.
City coil Neighborhood Quality July 7, 1992
Page -6-
Enclosures:
Exhibit
1:
OgDertim Park and Recreation Areas
Exhibit
2:
Park Acreage and Ratio by Neighborhood
Exhibit
3:
Park and Recreation Land Needed
Exhibit
4:
Cupertino Park arra Recreation Areas: 1/2 mile radius
Exhibit
5:
Existing and Pry Open Space
Exhibit
6:
Trail Linkages
Exhibit
7:
The Bay Trail
genplan/cc7692
r -I -----
EXHIBIT
T
\\
%nF
I
�
•O
...
�O�•'
� .1
1
O
5
o
ni
O
�I
v c
i
��
�o
a
�
D
1
E
n
�
r
■
O
E
Bubb Road(0)
99 fUmLk
� ��—d1rwA trJ
O Foothill Blvd
W/�
o
m 3
o
p N_
D m ..�
to lu
a
0 31
0
ma
CD
i ❑ m
m
Blaney Ave
O n 0 .....
O ;• •:......... •...........
Miller Ave .YWOfe.Rd
O 1oo°
C
%nF
�
•O
...
�O�•'
� .1
1
O
5
o
ni
O
�I
v c
i
��
�o
a
�
D
1
E
n
�
m
■
O
E
Bubb Road(0)
99 fUmLk
• .•
•
/`.
�
p0 3 I
^
.• '•
...................
,{•
Stelling Rd
--------------i
LPL:
o
0
: m �• ..ti
.•...
r
ar"�••••••
DeAnza Blvd
W/�
o
m 3
o
p N_
D m ..�
to lu
a
0 31
0
ma
CD
i ❑ m
m
Blaney Ave
O n 0 .....
O ;• •:......... •...........
Miller Ave .YWOfe.Rd
O 1oo°
C
%nF
?
■
5
o
od
O
n
v c
?
��
�o
a
m
9'
n
�
m
■
O
W/�
o
m 3
o
p N_
D m ..�
to lu
a
0 31
0
ma
CD
i ❑ m
m
Blaney Ave
O n 0 .....
O ;• •:......... •...........
Miller Ave .YWOfe.Rd
O 1oo°
EXHIBIT 2
iJ
0
0
C:
Q
(D
CL
A
v
N
to
cD
0
0
CD
U
1
ti
V
N
CD
CD
O
m
011
21Mi
z
0
mi
7i
j
O
4h-
m
w
0
III
01
3
W
W
a)
V
P
J
D
3
v
CJ1
0
N
1
m
w
�i
m
F
3
N
O
co
N
0
TI
N
N
co
N
0
0
m'
N
W
O
w
CL
CD
O
w
CD
Ln
cID
3
N
N
ml1
C -MI
2
0
m
CD
w
a
�n
O
m
v
1
v
Co
0
>v
Iv
N
0
m
1
a)
ca
co
CD
CD
n
CD
(D
x
m
ro
N
0
U1
7 �
�2I
0
7
r
W
C-
N
C
C-
-
N
N
7
cl)
W
W
-•
1
Cl
4
Ln
coo
-+
N
co
W
CO
a
o 'D
j
M
"
C7
-o
O
O
o
o
-n
0
CD
CD
T
W
m
D
0
w
3
s
z
r
�
CD OT
O
W
1
00
�
W W
C
j
a
CD
v
W
j
'1
07
O
o
W
0
?
w
0 2
0
o
<
a
C
M
m
-
�,
Lo
CID
CD
C
co
m
m
C-)
x
=
0
Cm
_
r
D
(D
3
�
N
W
O
co
�
-r
N
CO
O
M
1
0
j
O
4h-
m
w
0
III
01
3
W
W
a)
V
P
J
D
3
v
CJ1
0
N
1
m
w
�i
m
F
3
N
O
co
N
0
TI
N
N
co
N
0
0
m'
N
W
O
w
CL
CD
O
w
CD
Ln
cID
3
N
N
ml1
C -MI
2
0
m
CD
w
a
�n
O
m
v
1
v
Co
0
>v
Iv
N
0
m
1
a)
ca
co
CD
CD
n
CD
(D
x
m
ro
N
0
U1
7 �
�2I
0
W
D
N
D z
-+ 3
cl)
W
W
-•
1
coo
r
CO
o 'D
CL
o
C7
D
<
CD
w
m
T
W
m
D
3
s
z
r
�
CD OT
1
W
1
00
�
W W
C
j
CA)
v
CD z
m
r
o
o N O
0
?
w
0 2
a
0-
<
O
- O
M
m
C-
(
o
3
c
D
0
w
N
W
W
O
co
4
N
CO
O
L2
C7
C)
•E
o.,
o
O'C
CO
aLi
0
ca '�
y
G
� L
0 �
L
CQ
o
c
�
o
Q '
L
O
O
OCD
Zvv�
vi
�
v, —
_
L
C
Z
C tC
Zw
p C4
Za
•.• CO L
U�e�a
L
V L G
Qcc
O
O
0
o
00
N
O
'J
0
00
N
O
M
O
O U,
Vl
o
=
Oo
00
00
o
-
N
�
o
v
rn
[�
N
j
CD
N
t
M
O
M
N
Cr1
M
h
M 1
ON
O
Vl
C)
O�
N
•cr
00
r•
N
N F
00
Cl.
N
L2
C7
•E
o.,
o
O'C
CO
aLi
O
ca '�
y
G
� L
0 �
L
CQ
L2
C7
�
aLi
p
c �
O
L
CQ
c
Q '
L
O
O
OCD
Zvv�
vi
�
v, —
_
L
C
Z
C tC
Zw
p C4
Za
•.• CO L
U�e�a
G CJ
Qoa.
V L G
Qcc
L ti
O�
L2
C7
o u
z z
R."
00
N �C 00 00
N N
A9AMIN111■1111111111
It
h., I
N
in
06
41 0 d
(U
0 ww
0 o
U >
rw >4-
V) r. u
E
Q) 0 0 C o
oo� 64 �4 1-4 V'*)' w W" u vo) u 1260
"Liza
0 V)
0
U
U
, 'o
u
06
m
t -
m
N
�c
1--1
--1
4—
o u
z z
R."
00
N �C 00 00
N N
A9AMIN111■1111111111
It
h., I
N
in
06
41 0 d
(U
0 ww
0 o
U >
rw >4-
V) r. u
E
Q) 0 0 C o
oo� 64 �4 1-4 V'*)' w W" u vo) u 1260
"Liza
Parks & Recreation - National Park Land Standards
National Park Land Standards
The National Recreation and Park Association suggests that a park system, at a minimum,
be composed of a total of 6.25 to 10.50 acres of developed open space per 1,000
population.
Park Classification
Playlots
Description: Small areas intended primarily for the use of children up to early elementary
grades. Most suited for apartments, townhouse, and trailer parks.
Contents: Play equipment, swings, slides, sandboxes, benches.
Page 1 of 3
Population served: Generally, serves ages toddlers to age nine. Should be designed to have
areas that accommodate adult gathering.
Service area and accessibility. The service area is confined to a sub -neighborhood level of
500 to 2,500 residents within a 1/4 mile area.
Acres/1,000 people: No ratio established; suggested .1 to .3 acres
Size range: 1,000 square feet to one acre. Can be serviced through mobile recreation
programs.
Neighborhood Playground
Description: Designed to provide both active and passive short-term activities. Usually
located adjacent to public schools.
Contents: Distinct play areas for preschool and school age children, shelter structures, open
space, multiple -use paved for court games, areas for field games, some off-street parking,
lighting.
Population served: General focus is for ages 5 to 14, with informal recreation for all ages.
One per 1,000 to 5,000 population: possibly one for every elementary school.
Service area and accessibility. Neighborhood. Walking distance within 1/2 mile radius.
Acres/1,000 persons: 2.0 for cities of 10,000 to 25,000
1.5 for cities of 25,000 to 100,000
Size range acres: 5-10 for cities of 1,000 to 25,000
4-8 for cities of 25,000 to 100,000
Neighborhood Park
Description: Landscaped natural park of limited size primarily for passive recreational needs
of all ages but with designated active areas. Provides some scenic and aesthetic value.
Should be located in the center of a multiple -family dwelling neighborhood or nearby site.
Content. Open lawn space, shrubbery, small picnic areas, drinking fountain, miniature scenic
paths or nature walks, area for court games if not provided at a nearby recreation facility, off-
street parking, lighting. Has some program potential.
http://www.ci.cedar-park.tx.us/parks/park_standards.html 1/30/02
Parks & Recreation - National Park Land Standards
Population served: For all ages. From 1,000 to 10,000 maximum.
Service area and accessibility. Entire neighborhood. If park is unique, it may attract others
from another neighborhood.
Acres/1,000 persons: 2.0 for cities of 1,000 to 25,000
1.5 for cities of 25,000 to 100,000
Size range acres: 6-8 for cities of 1,000 to 25,000
5-8 for cities of 25,000 to 100,000
Community Playfield
Description: Primarily an athletic complex that serves the recreational needs of the
community. Usually one per community, however, if the community is cut by barriers or if
sufficient acreage cannot be obtained, then two are recommended.
Page 2 of 3
Content: Athletic complex - lighted court and field games area, community center, swimming
pool, lawn areas, adequate parking, may have picnic and play area for children. May be a
portion of major community park. Has high potential for recreation programming.
Population served: All ages. Entire population of community, 10,000 minimum to 30,000
maximum.
Service area and accessibility. Within biking distance.
Acres/1,000 persons: Minimum one acre per 1,000 persons.
Cities up to 50,000 it is recommended there be 2 acres per 1,000 persons
Size range acres: 15 to 25 for Cities of 1,000 to 250,000
Major Community Park
Description: A large natural area and/or landscaped area to provide urban dwellers escape
for city congestion without traveling a large distance. Designed to accommodate a large
number of people and a wide variety of activities. Provides for both intensive use and
passive use.
Content: Provides for combination of intensive and non -intensive development ranging from
play apparatus to bicycle trails. Typical facilities include swimming facilities, picnic tables,
paths, game courts, gardens, and natural areas, pavilion, ample parking, sanitary facilities.
May include multipurpose trails internally or as part of a system.
Population served: All ages, toddler to retiree. Serves between 40,000 to 100,000 people.
Service area and accessibility. Entire population for cities with population up to 25,000. 1-4
miles for cities of 1,000 to 25,000 persons; within 30 minutes for cities of 25,000 to 250,000.
Acres/1,000 persons: From minimum of one acre to maximum of five acres.
Recommended: 5.0 acres for cities of 1,000 to 100,000
Size range acres: 20 - 35 for cities of 1,000 to 25,000
50 - 100 for cities of 25,000 to 100,000
http://www.ci.cedar-park.tx.us/parks/park_Standards.html 1/30/02
Parks & Recreation - National Park Land Standards Page 3 of")
Urban Greenspace or Open Space
Description: Passive areas in landscaped or natural state in or near urban areas. May be
planned for conversion to more intensive recreational use when needed. May provide
recreational use when needed. May provide recreational experiences, provide environmental
quality, or act as buffers. Main recreational purpose is to act as buffer from congestion and
provide aesthetic experience. May also act as a land bank.
Contents: Natural lands, watershed and waterfront, forests; landscaped borders, parkways,
and boulevards, corner parks, medians, downtown aesthetic parks, plazas, malls, sanitary
facilities. May provide bicycle, hiking, and nature trails as a feature or as part of a larger
system.
Population served: Entire population, but may also be used as privacy buffer against high
traffic corridors.
Service area and accessibility. Not established. Usually part of the park system and viewed
as part of urban design and urban beautification program. Primary accessibility is visual,
may have hiking paths along traffic corridors.
Acres/1, 000 persons: No ratio established. Suggested to be .75 to 1.0 acres per 1,000.
Cities of up to 100,000 would be 1.0 per 1,000 persons.
Size range acres: From a few square feet to and extended boulevard or parkway
development.
Recreation Facilities
Facility
Area Needed
Units per Population Service Area
Basketball Court
7,280 sq ft
1 per 5,000
1/4 - 1/2 mi
Tennis Court
7,200 sq ft (1crt)
1 per 2,000
1/4 - 1/2 mi
Volleyball
4,000 sq ft
1 per 5,000
1/4 - 1/2 mi
Baseball (Youth)
1.2 acres min.
1 per 5,000
1/4 - 1/2 mi
Football
1.5 acres
1 per 20,000
15-20 minutes
travel time
Soccer
1.7-2.1 acres
1 per 10,000
Depends on
popularity
Softball
1.5-2 acres
1 per 5,000
1/4 - 1/2 mi
Multi -Use Court
9,840 sq ft
1 per 10,000
1/4 - 1/2 mi
Swimming Pool
2 acres minimum
1 per 20,000
15 -30 minutes
travel time
Trails
1 trail system per
region
04/18/00
http://www.ci.cedar-park.tx.us/parks/park_Standards.html 1/30/02