Reso 232 i File No. 19-Z-64
RESOLUTION NO. 232
41O OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DENYING THE
GRANTING OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2•-H to R-3-H.
APPLICANT: Don Excell
ADDRESS: P. 0. Box 508, Los Altos, California
SUBMITTED: September 30, 1964
LOCATION: Foothill Blvd. between Walnut Circle North and
Walnut Circle South.
ACRES: 0 .8
(continued from Page 1)
DENIED, this 29th day of November, 1964, at a regular meeting
of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following
roll call vote:
41O
AYES: Commissioners Frolich, Gates, Small, Traeumer, Thomson
NOES: Commissioner Hirshon
ABSENT: Commissioner Johnson
II
APPROVED:
Srott. Thomson
Chairman, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
•
Adde Laurin
City and Traffic Planner
NOTE: An appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission is
IIPplaced on the Agenda of the City Council for Dec. 7, 1964.
-2-
• C I ;- Y OF CUPERTINO
•
City Hall, 10321 South .Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road
Cupertino, California 95014
Telephone : (408) 252--4505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
DENYING THE GRANTING OF A ZONE CHANGE.
WHEREAS, the attached application has been submitted to the
City of Cupertino requesting a change of .zone in the zoning
regulations of the City, as stated on page two, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held at least one public
hearing in regard to the application on the date as noted on said
application; and
• WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has duly considered and
heard all evidence submitted in regard to said application; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as
required by the zoning ordinance of the City of Cupertino , •
111 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: •
•
1. That the Planning Commission finds that the proposed • •
zone change does not meet all of the following requirements:
a. Encourage the most appropriate use of land, . •
b . Conserve and stabilize the• value of property,
c . Provide for adequate open spaces for light and air,
d. Permit adequate control of fires,
e . Promote the health, safety and public welfare,
f. Provide for the orderly development of the City,
g. Be advantageous to the property and improvements
in the zoning district and neighborhood in which
the property is located ,
(continued on Page 2)
•
111