Reso 1809 25-TM-77
RESOLUTION NO. 1809
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE
APPROXIMATELY TWENTY (20) ACRES INTO FIVE SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
APPLICANT: ALMADEN VALLEY ENGINEERS
ADDRESS: 4606 Meridian Avenue, Suite "E", San Jose, California 95124
SUBMITTED: September 16, 1977
LOCATION: Adjacent to and westerly of Regnart Road immediately contiguous
. to the Candy Rock subdivision.
Approval is recommended subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and
subconclusions as set forth in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting
of February 13, 1978.
CONDITIONS:
1-14. Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the
improvement requirements set forth in Policy. Statement No. 3 of the
. Hillside General Plan and the special conditions enumerated herein.
In the event a conflict does exist, the special conditions as
enumerated herein shall apply.
15. The approval is granted based upon tentative map Exhibit A 2nd
Revision of 25-TM-77, as may be modified by additional conditions
contained herein.
® 16. The grading concept and building location for each lot shall sub-
stantially reflect Exhibit A 2nd Revision of 25-TM-77. The Director
of Planning and Development, or designee, shall review and approve
subsequent building permit applications based upon the R1 zoning
and grading ordinance regulations and the grading and fence location
policies established below.
a) Pad elevations. The finish vertical elevation of the vehicular
turn-around pads for each building site shall be within ten (10)
feet of the finish elevation designated on Exhibit A 2nd Revision.
Mass grading of building site and driveways is not permitted .
Permits to grade building-sites or private drives may be issued
only in conjunction with building permits for residential struc-
tures.
b) The foundation system for residential structures located on
Sites 3 and 4 .shall be of a pole frame, pier design, or step
foundation, thereby eliminating the requirement for extensive
grading for a building pad. The specific architectural design
of the buildings shall not be subject to review. The founda-
tion system and grading for Sites 1 and 2 may be a pole frame
design or building pad design inasmuch as said building sites
are located on relatively level terrain and the lots are large.
c) Retaining walls may be employed to resolve ground stability
problems or minimize grading.
411
•
-2-
CITY OF CUPERTINO
411
City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
Telephone: (408) 252-4505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING
THE APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP
WHEREAS, the attached application has been submitted to the City of Cupertino
requesting approval of a tentative map; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in
regard to the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has duly considered and heard all evidence
submitted in regard to said application; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the
subdivision and procedural ordinances of the City of Cupertino.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That the Planning Commission makes the following findings :
•
a) That the proposed map is consistent with the general and specific
plans.
b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the general and specific plans.
c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development.
d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
development.
e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are
not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially
and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are
not likely to cause serious public health problems.
g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will
not conflict with easements, bythe acquired public at large,ge, for
access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.
•
-1-
25-TM-77
Planning Commission Resolution 1809 (continued)
d) A registered landscape architect shall review grading plans and
in consort with the project and City Engineer, shall submit a
plan to prevent soil erosion and visually screen extensive cut
and fill areas. The intent of the visual screen is to soften
grading scars. A 100% screening effect is not required. The
oak trees designated on Exhibit A 2nd Revision shall be retained
unless the design solution to retain said trees creates an
aesthetically unpleasing condition or it results in unsafe road
design. The registered landscape architect shall review the
design for tree retention design solutions to ensure their
protection during and after construction.
e) The drain field areas shall be recontoured after grading. The
drain field shall reflect the natural topography to the greatest
extent possible.
f) Solid board fencing for privacy and security reasons shall be
limited to an area of 5,000 sq. ft. excluding the main structure
or such figure established by adoption of a.Hillside ordinance,
whichever figure is lesser. Open fencing may be constructed on
property lines and other internal lot areas to contain domestic
animals or provide security. A corral or barbed wire fences are
examples of open fencing.
41, The applicant or subsequent lot owners may appeal the Director of
Planning's decision regarding the above design standards to the
Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may review the appeal
as an unfinished business agenda item. •
17. All privide driveways serving the development shall be improved as
required by Policy No. 3 of Hillside General Plan and as directed by
the City Engineer.
18. The applicant shall record an appropriate deed restriction and
covenant running with the land subject to the review and approval
of the City Attorney, for all parcels which share a common private
drive or private roadway with one or more other parcels as dis-
played on Exhibit A. Said deed restriction shall provide for the
necessary reciprocal ingress/egress easements to and from the affected
parcels. Said easements shall be recorded at such time as interest in
one or more of the affected parcels is initially sold or transferred
to another party.
19. A reciprocal maintenance agreement to be reviewed and approved by the
City Attorney, shall be required for all parcels which share a common
private drive or private roadway with one or more other parcels within
the tract. Said agreement shall be recorded in conjunction with recorda-
tion of the final map.
a
-3-
Planning Commission Resolution 1809 (continued)
20. That the applicant shall record a covenant on each lot to be trans-
ferred informing future lot purchasers of the existence of geologic
hazards in the area, and additionally, that special development
regulations apply to any construction on the lot. Future applicants
for building permits shall comply with the recommendations in the
July 1977 Geologic Report entitled, "Geological and Soil Engineering
Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, Lot 366-3-2, Regnart
Road, Cupertino, California", as amended.
21. The developer shall agree to participate in an improvement district
to install street improvements on public roadways within the Regnart
Canyon area as defined by the General Plan. The City shall relieve
the developer of the above requirement if and only if the assessment
district is not formed (within five years) at which time the developer
shall install on his own the required improvements as outlined in the
condition of approval.
22. The approval is for four (4) dwelling units (lots).. Slope density
credit from any specific lot or group of lots cannot be transferred;
The applicant/owner or subsequent owner may adjust property lines,
subject to City approval, if the property line adjustment does not
result in the creation of additional dwellings.
23. No earthmoving or other heavy construction equipment shall be operated
on Saturday, Sunday, or national holidays and on weekdays between the
hours of 6:00 PM and 7:00 AM of the following day. The above require-
ment is waived if the construction activity is of a nature that requires
continuous operation such as the connection of utility systems of the
placement of concrete into a single form. The requirement is addi-
® tionally waived if construction cannot be stopped without creating
either safety problems or hazardous conditions or construction emergency
as determined by the Director of Public Works.
The use of hand tools or hand held power tools is not regulated by
this condition.
24. The applicant shall incorporate measures to control dust during
construction. The dust control measures shall be approved and
inspected by the City staff and shall be initiated in conjunction
with grading operations for road work and building sites.
The above regulation does not apply to existing lots of record.
25. That the driveway access to Site No. 2 shall be approved by the
Central Fire District.
--------------------------
-4-
25-TM-77
Planning Commission No. 1809 (continued)
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of February, 1978., at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by
the following :roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Adams, Blaine, Gatto, Chairman Koenitzer
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Markkula
ABSENT: None
APPROVED: '
/s/ R. D. Koenitzer
• R. D. Koenitzer, Chairman
Planning Commission
ATTEST:
•
1111) ILL.41-1:01.1)ER
Robert Cowan
Assistant Planning Director
•
111
-5-