Loading...
Reso 1906 23-U-78 RESOLUTION NO. 1906 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A TRAVEL AGENCY TO OCCUPY APPROXIMATELY 1,400 SQ. FT. IN THE EXISTING HOMESTEAD LANES SHOPPING CENTER IN A P (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH RECREATIONAL/ENTER- TAINMENT AND LIMITED COMMERCIAL INTENT) ZONE. APPLICANT: Thornwood Associates ADDRESS : P.O. Box 6088, San Jose, California 95150 SUBMITTED: November 8, 1978 LOCATION: Southeast corner of Homestead Road and Stelling Road Approval is recommended subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and subconclusions as set forth in the minutes of the Planning' Commission meeting of December 11, 1978. CONDITIONS: 1-14. Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the special conditions enumerated herein. In the event a conflict does exist, the special conditions enumerated herein shall apply. 15. That the approval is based upon Exhibit A of Application 23-U-78 as ® may be modified by additional conditions contained herein. PASSED AND ADOPTED this llth day of December, 1978, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES : Commissioners Adams, Claudy, Gatto, Koenitzer, Chairperson Blaine NAYS: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None APPROVED: /s/ Sharon Blaine Sharon Blaine, Chairperson Planning Commission ATTEST: cv.„„a,, Robert Cowan Assistant Planning Director 4104 -2- CITY OF CUPERTINO City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 Telephone: (408) 252-4505411 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMEND- ING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a USE PERMIT, as stated on Page 2; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application meets the following requirements: a. That the use or uses are in conformance with the general plan and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. b. That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. c. That the proposed use will not generate a level of traffic over and beyond that of the capacity of the existing street system. d. That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use nor injurious to property and improvements in the neighbor- hood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application of the USE PERMIT is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions stated on Page 2; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the aforementioned findings be approved and adopted, and that the Secretary be, and is hereby directed to notify the parties affected by this decision. -1- (continued on Page 2) 4110