Reso 1868 13-U-78
RESOLUTION NO. 1868
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
410 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO PERMIT A
HEALTH SPA TO OCCUPY APPROXIMATELY 4,800 SQ. FT. IN
THE EXISTING HOMESTEAD CENTER.
APPLICANT: Thornwood Associates
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 6088, San Jose, California 95150
SUBMITTED: June 6, 1978
LOCATION: Southeast corner of Homestead and Stelling Roads
Approval is recommended subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and
subconclusions as set forth in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting
of July 24, 1978.
CONDITIONS:
1-14. Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the special
conditions enumerated herein. In the event a conflict does exist, the
special conditions enumerated herein shall apply.
15. The approval is based upon Exhibits A and B of Application 13-U-78, as may be
amended by additional conditions contained herein.
16. That the use permit is conditioned upon the continued viability of a
® reciprocal parking agreement. And if for any reason the agreement is
terminated this use permit may subject .r be to , eview.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th, day of July, 1978, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Adams, Claudy, Gatto, Koenitzer, Chairperson Blaine -
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
APPROVED:
/s/ Sharon Blaine
ATTEST: •
Sharon Blaine, Chairperson
Planning Commission
Robert Cowan
Assistant Planning Director
S
-2-
CITY OF CUPERTINO
City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
Telephone: (408) 252-4505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMEND-
ING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a USE PERMIT, as stated on Page 2; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support
said application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application meets the
following requirements:
a. That the use or uses are in conformance with the general plan
and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically
permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located.
b. That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed use.
c. That the proposed use will not generate a level of traffic
over and beyond that of the capacity of the existing street
system.
d. That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the
health, safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use
nor injurious to property and improvements in the neighbor-
hood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and other
evidence submitted in this matter, the application of the USE PERMIT
is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions stated
on Page 2; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the aforementioned findings be approved and adopted, and that the
Secretary be, and is hereby directed to notify the parties affected by
this decision.
Alb
-1- (continued on Page 2)