Loading...
Reso 3032APPLICATION 15-U-87 C I T Y OF CUPERTINO 10430 S. DE ANZA BOUIEVARD C(JFEFTD1O, CALIFORNIA 95014 RESOIiTTION NO. 3032 OF THE PLANNING OCKCISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPE1MgO REC344ENDI1G APPRWAL OF A USE PEIdIIT TO OPERATE A SNACK SHOP AT AN E}QST'= SERVICE STATION *07AS, the Planning Cc =isston of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described on Page 2 of this Resolution; and krroTASI the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support . said application.; and MEREASI the Planning Commission finds that the application meets the following requirements: a) That the use or uses are in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino, and are not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to aaxamodate the proposed use. c) That the proposed use will not generate a level of traffic over and above that of the capacity of the existing street system. d) That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the health, • safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed uses, nor injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the om-iditicns which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusiens upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public }searing record concerning Application 15-U-87 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Coimnission Meeting of May 11, 1987, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. r L=ON NO. 3032 (15-U-87) 5/11/87 .� PAGE-2 SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No(s) 15-9-87 Applicant: Shell oil Comzmny Property Owner: Edward and Maria Cali Location: Southeast corner of Stevens CreekBoulevard and Miller Avenue Parcel Area (Acres): .51 net .75 QrUss SECTION III• CONDITIONS ArMIN TEMM BY THE PIANNM DEPART 1. AA�JED EXHIBITS • The reoameeidation of approval is based upon Exhibit A of Application 15-U-87 except as amended by conditions contained herein. 2. PARKING ]2�idVEbg2TI8 The applicant shall provide 7 striped parking spaces on site. A striping plan shall be approve by staff prior to installation. The plan shall omply with the City dimensional standards. One space shall be designated as a handicapped parking space. 3. USE LIDIITATIONS This use permit authorizes the operation of a 370 sq. ft. snack shop at an existing gasoline station. Approval is granted to sell small • personal convenience items and pre -packaged and microwavable foods in disposable containers intended primarily for consumption off -premises. Sale of food it, intended primarily for cvn-premises consumption is prohibited. Sale of alcoholic beverages is prohibited. The 928 square foot area labeled "storage area" on Exhibit A shall not be used for storage of snack shop related products. The snack shop shall maintain the same hours of operation as the hours for the sale of gasoline. 4. ON SITE P All automobiles parked on the site shall be placed in the striped off-street parking spaces to be shown on the approved striping plan as required in Condition No. 2. RESOLU=ON NO. 3032 (15-U-87) 5/11/87 ,. PAGE - 3 5. BUILDING CODE The applicant shall coqply with all building code requirements pertaining to the snack shop. The applicant shall record a covenant which docents the cumulative floor area of applications received after February 1, 1986 and informs future property owners of the street and streetscaps improvement obligation. A draft covenant shall be submitted to staff for approval prior to recordation. The covenant sha11 contain a clause acknowledging that any additional . application involving expansion or change in use shall trigger standard street irnprovement and special streetscape improvement requirements as established by City policy. In the event that the applicant or subsequent property owner shall desire to make any minor changes, alterations or amendment of the approved development plan, a written reg1eQt or revised development plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Development. If the Director makes a finding that the changes are minor and do not result in a material affect upon the appearance or function of the project, said changes may be certified on the revised plan. If approval of said charges is withheld, the applicant may appeal to the Planning Conission. If the Director finds that the requested charges are material, such charges shall be referred to the Planning Oo mission for approval. If the changes are denied by the Planning Commission, the applicant may appeal to the City Council as provided in City Ordinance No. 652. If said charges are approved by the Planning Commission, an appeal may be made to the City Council by any interested party. Further, any Member of the City Council nay request a hearing before the City Council regarding said approved oranges. Said request shall be made within ten (10) days from the date of approval of said changes by the Planning Commission. 8. SECURITY PLAN The applicant shall prepare a security plan to minimize the potential for theft and rWbery. Said plan shall be reviewed by the city sheriff liason and approved by the City. The applicant shall record a covenant running with the lanai agreeing to oomply with future security requirements as ihposed by a subsequent City Resolution or City Ordinance. The covenant shall be approved by the Planning Department and City Attorney prior to recordation. RESOLZJTION NO. 3032 (15-U-87) 5/11/87 PAGE - 4 - • PASSED AND ADOPTED this llth day of May, 1987 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMNJISSIONERS: Adams, Claudy, Sorensen, Szabo, and Chairman Mackenzie NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ATTEST: APPROVED: 44'1-(PWCAA.° Robert Cowan Donald Mackenzie, irman Director of Planning Cupertino Planning 'ssion RES15U87(L5) •