Reso 2987 APPLICATION 18-U-85 (AMENDED)
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10430 SOUTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 2987
OF THE PLANNING COMMIISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A USE PERMIT TO EXPAND OPERATION OF AN EXISTING
CHILD CARE FACILITY WITHIN A SURPLUS SCHOOL SITE
BY INCREASING ENROLLMENT TO 150 STUDENTS AND EXPANDING
STAFF TO INCLUDE A MAXIMUM OF 40 EMPLOYEES
SECTION I: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a Use Permit, as described on Page 2 of this Resolution;
and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support
said application. ; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application meets the
following requirements:
a) That the use or uses are in conformance with the General Plan of the
City of Cupertino, and are not detrimental to existing uses or to
uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is
to be located.
b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed use.
c) That the proposed use will not generate a level of traffic over and
above that of the capacity.of the existing street system.
d) That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of such proposed uses, nor injurious to
property and improvements in the neighborhood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and
other evidence submitted in this matter; the application for Use Permit is
hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are
enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified
in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record
concerning Application 18-U-85 (Amended) as set forth in the Minutes of
the Planning Commission Meeting of January 26, 1986, and are incorporated
by reference as though fully set forth herein.
Rgsolution No. 2987 (18 U-85 (Amended) ) 1/26/86
Page - 2 -
SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
• Application No(s) 18-U-85 (Amended)
Applicant: Apple Computer
Property Owner: Cupertino Union School District
Location: West side of Portal Avenue across from
Amherst Drive at 10253 Portal Avenue (Nan
Allan School site)
Parcel Area (AC) : 4.0 net
SECTION III: COND1'1'1ONS TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in
accordance with Ordinance 125.
2. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Surface flow across public sidewalks may be allowed in the R-1, R-2
and R-3 zones unless storm drain facilities are deemed necessary by
the City Engineer. Development in all other zoning districts shall be
served by on site storm drainage facilities connected to the City
111 storm drainage system. If City storm drains are not available,
drainage facilities shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
3. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground
Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other relate Ordinances and
regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with
affected utility providers for installation of underground utility
devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility
underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval
of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
4. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with
the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not
limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fess, park
dedication fees and fees for undergrounding of utilities. Said
agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits.
'Resolution No. 2987 (18-U-85 (Amended)) 1/26/86
Page - 3 -
ID SECTION IV: CONDITIONS TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
5. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits A 1st Revision, B,
C, C-1, C-2, D, E, F, and Informational of Application 18 U-85
(Amended) , except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in
this Resolution.
6. USE LIMITATIONS
The subject use permit authorizes expansion of the preschool,
kindergarten, day care facility described under Condition 18 of
_ Resolution 2639. Maximum enrollment may be increased to 150 students,
served by a maximum on-site staff of 40 employees.
7. HOURS OF OPERATION
Hours of operation described under Condition 17 of Resolution No. 2639
may extend frout 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM during weekdays.
8. LIGHTING
Lighting improvements, shall be subject to review by staff to ensure
no spillover onto adjacent residential property and minimun glare.
9. TRAFFIC GENERATION PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Prior to activating the use permit, the applicant shall demonstrate.
that the traffic levels will not exceed those generated-under the
previous use permit approval (Application 18-U-85) granted to Small -
Worlds (Maximum 352 trips) . Traffic reduction may be accomplished via
any reasonable method including but not limited to the following:
1. Busing children and/or staff.
2. Limiting the nuMber of children in attendance in any one day.
3. Car pool programs.
The program devised to comply with this performance standard shall be
verified by a traffic engineer, presented to and accepted by the
Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits to move on
the portable structures or modify the existing buildings.
The Commission will consider the traffic strategy as a non-public
hearing but will notify any residents who wish to be notified.
The Commission may impose any reasonable requirement to ensure
compliance with the performance standard. The use permit is subject
to review and possible revocation if the performance standard is
complied with.
411
Resolution No. 2987 (18 U-85 (Amended)) 1/26/86
Page - 4 -
IP 10. MODIFICATION OF APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
In the event that the applicant or subsequent property owner shall
desire to make any minor changes, alterations or amendment of the
approved development plan, a written request or revised development
plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Development.
If the Director makes a finding that the changes are minor and do not
result in a material affect upon the appearance or function of the
project, said changes may be certified on the revised plan. If
approval of said changes is withheld, the applicant may appeal to the
Planning Commission.
If the Director finds that the requested changes are material, such
changes shall be referred to the Planning Commission for approval. If
the changes are denied by the Planning Commission, the applicant may
appeal to the City Council as provided in City Ordinance No. 652.
If said changes are approved by the Planning Commission, an appeal may
be made to the City Council by any interested party. Further, any
Member of the City Council may request a hearing before the City
Council regarding said approved changes. Said request shall be made
within ten (10) days from the date of approval of said changes by the
Planning Commission.
• PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of January, 1987, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Adams, Claudy, Sorensen, Szabo,
and Chairman MacKenzie
NAYS: COMNIISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: COMNIISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
ATIEST: APPROVED:
D"Afg CaU-14A•1
;>610,A,v1A.1_1(.:0
Robert S. Cowan Don MacKenzie, CI-Airman
Planning Director Planning Commission
RS18U85APP(BB)lvm