Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PC Summary 08-14-2018
To: Mayor and City Council Members From: Benjamin Fu, Assistant Director of Community Development Date: August 15, 2018 Subj: REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISIONS MADE August 14, 2018 Chapter 19.12.1.70 of the Cupertino Municipal code provides for appeal of decisions made by the Plannia . Commission 1e Apylication ASA -2018-01, TR -2018-04, Jennifer Kirby (Target Corporation), 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd Architectural and Site Approval Permit to consider allowing facades modifications to an existing commercial building (Target) and site improvements including restriping, and the creation of. two public portals along Stevens Creek Boulevard and Saich Way and a Tree Removal Permit. to consider allowing the removal and replacement of 43 protected development trees located within the proposed development area Action The Planning Commission approved the application(s) on a 5-0-0 vote Enclosures:. Planning Commission Report August 14, 2018 Planning Commission Resolution(s) 6858, 6859 Plan Set g.planning/Post Hearing/smm�zaly to cc081418 SUBJECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE a CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3308 o FAX: (408) 777-3333 CUPERTINO.ORG PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Meeting: August 14, 2018 Architectural and Site Approval Permit to consider allowing facade modifications to an existing commercial building (Target) and site improvements including restriping, and the creation of two public portals along Stevens Creek Blvd. and Saich Way and a Tree Removal Permit to consider allowing the removal and replacement of 43 protected development tree located within the proposed development area. (Application No(s): ASA -2018-01, TR -2018-04; Applicant(s): Jennifer Kirby (Kimley-Horn); Location: 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd.; APN: 326-32-055) RECOMMENDED ACTIONS That the Planning Commission adopt the proposed draft resolutions to: 1. Find the project exempt from.CEOA (Attachment 1); 2. Approve the Architectural and Site Approval Permit (ASA -2018-01) (Attachment 1); 3. Approvel the Tree Removal Permit (TR -2018-04) (Attachment, 2): DISCUSSION Project Data: Commercial/Office/Residential Heart of the City P (CG, Res) / Planned Development General Commercial and Residential 359,806 s.f. / 8.26 acre,, 128,429 s.f. / 2.9 acres 35.7% 21' (top of parapet) 514 (per Municipal Code) 26 No Chance No Change No Change 23'-6" (top of parapet at entrances only) (per parking study) 28 Project Consistency with General Plan: Yes Zonas : Yes Environmental Assessment: Categorically Exempt Background: The project is located within the Heart of the City Specific Plan Area within the Crossroads subarea and North Crossroads Node. The Crossroads subarea is intended to be an active, pedestrian -oriented shopping district promoting active retail uses with entries along the street, creating public gathering spaces and plazas, and encouraging outdoor dining along the Stevens Creek Boulevard corridor. The surrounding uses include the Saich Way Station retail center and a childcare center to the west, Cupertino Crossroads retail center to the south (across Stevens Creek Blvd.), a restaurant and the Marina Plaza retail center to the east, and a multi -family residential neighborhood to the north. Figure 1- Existing Land Uses Since then, Target has refined its branding strategies based on other field testing sites and, as part of their National Remodel Program, has changed their scope of work. The project proposal is a remodel of the existing Target store including interior, exterior, and site improvements to enhance the brick -and mortar shopping experience with no increase in square footage (See Attachments 3 and 4). Analysis: Architectural Design and Site Planning The project implements the new corporate strategy by proposing a sleek contemporary aesthetic, utilizing varied facade materials, creating public plazas adjacent to the public sidewalks, providing defined and enhanced pedestrian and bicycle connections; and integrating an interactive muralon the western and southern elevations (General Plan Strategies LU -3.3.1 Attractive Design, LU -3.3.6 Architecture and Articulation, and LU -15.1.2 Streetscape.) The project incorporated recommendations from staff and the City's consulting architect (See Attachment 5) and includes the following features: - ® Ensure visual and physical connections from public sidewalk to project ® Provide bicycle racks and benches at entry plaza and at public portals ® Provide enhanced paving and landscaping at public portals and walkways Provide additional public art to enhance pedestrian and bicyclist experience ® Extend wood board paneling and other landscape elements to soften the existing stucco treatment on the building. The fagade modifications will have a strong emphasis on the experience at entrances including the public portals and entry plaza. Currently, the building has a single entrance into the Target store, housed under a portico -like entrance feature designed as. a stucco frame with a tiled hipped roof (See Figure 2 inset). With the proposed 'project, the applicant proposes to remodel the existing entrance, add a new entrance on the western . elevation of the building and new order pickup entrances on both the southern and eastern elevations close to the southeast corner of the building. The fagade improvements primarily consist of providing two primary entrances — one facing Stevens Creek Boulevard and the other facing Saich Way (See Figure 2) and the addition of a modern winged wrap-around canopy at the southwest corner of the building to help accentuate the entrance. The two entries lead to a landscaped and paved entry plaza with outdoor seating at individual tables and chairs and planters with integrated benched seating. The two main entrances and the pick-up entrance (on the eastern elevation) are highlighted with wood siding on the parapet and on the underside of the canopy using Stonewood's architectural paneling (Mambo) and below the canopy drip line using Stonewood's darker grain (Cocobala). The canopy cuts across the facade at an angle running from the entrances on the southwest corner to the southeast corner and to the northwest corner. The project proposes to paint the stucco areas above the canopy line beige -white and areas below the canopy line red. The north building elevation (along Alves Drive) is proposed to be enhanced by installing three-dimensional trellis panels with associated vegetation, to add articulation to the existing stucco wall and soften the side of the building that is facing residential uses (Strategy LU -13.7.5 Neighborhood Buffers). Site Improvements Public Portal The applicant has provided public space (or portals) adjacent to the public sidewalk, which identify areas of connectivity between the building and the right -of way. Providing these public portals furthers the City's General Plan policies LU -2.2. Pedestrian Oriented Public Spaces and LU -5.3 Enhance Connections. These portals are designed as passive rest areas. The portal along Saich Way is about 500 sq. ft. The portal along Stevens Creek Blvd., situated next to the existing bus stop, is about 1,100 sq. ft. These plaza areas will be paved with concrete pavers and bounded by drought -tolerant groundcover landscaping. Additional features include: ■ Rectilinear benched seating; ■ A waste trio station; ■ Bicycle parking and a bike repair station; ■ In -ground tree planting area; and ■ Two circular sculptural art benches designed with the same motif as the mural at the entrance of the building (See Public Art section below). Frontage Improvements As a result of the comments from the City's consulting architect and discussions with staff, to further General Plan policies and goals of the Heart of the City related -to promoting walkability and accessibility to active retail frontages; each of the side streets (excluding Alves Drive) are connected to the building via enhanced walkways utilizing concrete pavers (Strategy LU -13.7.3 Connectivity). Furthermore, the proposed walkways from Saich Way and the existing walkway off Stevens Creek Blvd. will lead to the newly proposed public portals. The existing street frontage and public -right of way along Stevens Creek ,Blvd and Saich Way has a monolithic curb. In compliance with the requirements of the Heart of the City Specific Plan, the applicant is proposing to implement the envisioned Streetscape Concept by separating the sidewalk from the roadway by reversing the location of the sidewalk and landscaping. The applicant proposes to plant trees to create a double row of trees along the sidewalk where currently none exists. These improvements are proposed along the entire length of Parcel 1 (APN 326-32-055) and Parcel 2 (APN 326-32- 056) along Stevens Creek Boulevard and Saich Way. Additionally, areas next to the landscape areas will be enhanced with paving consistent with the design of adjacent parcels. Furthermore, where appropriate, such as at the intersection of Saich Way and Stevens Creek Blvd. pear trees (Pyres calleryana) will be planted in rows on both sides of the sidewalk, consistent with the Heart of the City streetscape design for Central Stevens Creek Boulevard. The Department of Public Works will review and approve the final improvements prior to issuance of building permits. Landscaping and Trees The project includes the removal of 43 protected trees. The trees are considered required approved development trees per Section 14.18.050 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. The species proposed to be removed include pear trees, crape myrtles, silk trees, jacarandas, cherry trees, and Japanese maples. The majority of the tree removals are due to the poor health of the trees and/or because the trees are in conflict with the proposed improvements (including the proposed public portals.) The replacement trees comply with the guidelines identified in Municipal Code Section 14.18.160 (See Table 1.) The majority of the on-site trees are in good condition and are located beyond the area of development, within the parking lot, and along the perimeter of the site. In an effort to retain a mature tree canopy on-site, any trees not affected by the proposed development, and in good condition, will be preserved. The proposed replacement species include pear trees, jacarandas, and Western sycamores. Final locations and species of the trees will be reviewed and approved prior to building permit issuance. Additionally, staff recommends an arborist peer review be conducted prior to the issuance of demolition permits, to confirm the condition of retained trees, installation of tree protection measures, and at the end of construction, to verify the number and completion of replacement plantings. Public Art The applicant partnered with a local Bay Area artist to provide public art as part of the facade improvements (General Plan Policy LU -2.2 Pedestrian -Oriented Public Spaces and LU - 7.1 Public Art.) Michael Bartalos, the artist selected by the Target Creative Team, designed the three -paneled mural to capture and celebrate the natural scenery in and around Cupertino (See Attachment 6) in the piece titled Tree Town. The mural is located at the southwest corner of the building between the two new entrances. The motifs include trees, animals, and Cupertino landmarks that cumulatively span a distance of more than 100 linear feet on both the western and southern elevations. The mural also includes an interactive element in the form of a bench stylized like a tree swing hanging from a Big Leaf Maple tree in the background. This element is located on the wall facing Stevens Creek Blvd. In addition to the mural, the circular benches proposed at the public portals are designed to reference the imaging and motifs of the mural. The colors used on the seating also complements the colors used on the murals' graphics. Park Automobile Parking The parking ratio for properties zoned general commercial is 1 parking space per 250 square feet but an alternative standard may be allowed within a Planned Development zone where a parking study can justify a reduced standard. A parking study allows a development the flexibility to evaluate its parking need based on actual demand. A flexible parking standard allows for the promotion of other City and project goals such as improved walkability and bikeability. For example, in this case, a reduction in parking standards allows the applicant to replace parking spaces adjacent to the enhanced walkways with the proposed public portals, for improved public spaces and pedestrian and bike access, and create bioretention areas between parking stalls in the northwest parking area, for improved stormwater runoff quality. In 2016 (with the previously proposed project,) Hexagon Transportation Consultants Inc. prepared a parking study to survey the existing parking conditions (See Attachment 7.) The study was conducted on two Saturdays during peak hours in June and the results are summarized below: ��k�HlL ��daa • @ k+%�i d E t � � 11*1t3 � y�,[�`�'��1��� �'��� @ � Yra �(��(fe � ���,�ry9�,��'e `., Existing conditions 616 319-367 28-37%0 2016 proposal 428 319-367 15-25% Under existing conditions, the study included parking spaces on three parcels on the block on which a recorded shared parking access easement exists. However, under the "2016 proposal" the study only includes the parking stalls on the Target parcel (i.e., the most conservative count). The parking study indicates that only between 319 and 367 spaces were occupied at any time indicating that there is excess parking on site, and a reduced parking standard can accommodate the parking needs for the site. Furthermore, the restriping at the southwest corner of the parcel results in an additional 10 stalls from the existing condition. Therefore, the proposed 507 parking spaces on the Target site is adequate to accommodate its parking needs. Bicycle Parking The standard for properties zoned general commercial is 1 bicycle parking space per 5,000 square feet resulting in the requirement of 26 stalls. The applicant proposes a total of 28 parking stalls with 26 short-term bike stalls and two secure long-term bike lockers. The bicycle parking spaces are dispersed around the site: four stalls are proposed at the Saich Way public portal; eight are located at the Stevens Creek Blvd public portal; 14 are located at the southwestern entry plaza; and the two bike lockers are located by the employee entrance on the eastern side. Signage Signs are not approved as part of this development review and will be reviewed at a later date. Environmental Assessment: This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301 Existing Facilities (Class 1) consisting of repair, maintenance, and minor alteration of existing facilities. Other Department/Agency Review: The City's Building Division, Public Works Department, Environmental Services Division, the Santa Clara County Fire Department, and the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office reviewed the project and have no objections. PUBLIC NOTICING & OUTREACH The following table is a brief summary of the noticing done for this project: ■ Site Signage (14 days prior to the hearing) ■ Legal ad placed in newspaper (at least 10 days prior to the hearing) ■ 30 public hearing notices mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site (10 r to the hearin ■ Posted on the City's official notice bulletin board (one week prior to the hearing) ■ Posted on the City of Cupertino's website (one week prior to the hearing) No public comments have been received as of the date of production of this staff report (August 7, 2018). PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT This project is subject to the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Section 65920 — 65964). The City has complied with the deadlines found in the Permit Streamlining Act. Project Received: February 2, 2018; Deemed Incomplete: March 1, 2018 Project Resubmission: March 23, 2018; Deemed Incomplete: April 18, 2018 Project Resubmission: June 22, 2018; Deemed Complete: July 19, 2018 Project Resubmission: August 3, 2018; Deemed Complete: August 7, 2018 Since this project is Categorically Exempt, the City has 60 days (until October 7, 2018) to make a decision on the project. CONCLUSION Staff recommends approval of the project since the project and conditions of approval address all concerns related to the proposed development and all of the findings for approval of the proposed project, consistent with Chapter 19.168 and 14.18 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, may be made. NEXT STEPS Should the project be approved, the Planning Commission's decision on this project is final unless an appeal is filed within 14 calendar days of the date of the mailing of the decision, on August 28, 2018. The applicant may apply for building and other permits at the end of the appeal period to allow for the construction of the proposed improvements. This approval expires on August 14, 2020, at which time the applicant may apply for a one-year extension. Prepared by: Ellen Yau, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Piu Ghosh, Principal Planner Approved by: Benjamin Fu, Assistant Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS: 1— Draft Resolution for ASA -2018-01 2 — Draft Resolution for TR -2018-04 3 — Plan Set 4 — Development Narrative 5 — Consulting Architect's Comment Letter, 6 — Artist Bio and Public Art Design 7 — Parking Study ASA -2018-01 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6858 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR FACADE MODIFICATIONS TO AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING (TARGET) AND SITE IMPPROVEMENTS INCLUDING RESTRIPING, AND THE CREATION OF TWO PUBLIC PORTALS ALONG STEVENS CREEK BLVD. AND SAICH WAY, LOCATED AT 20745 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. (APN 326-32-005) SECTION I• PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ASA -2018-01 Applicant: Jennifer Kirby (Kimley-Horn) Location: 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd. 1 WIN 11: FIN DANGS FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL PERMIT: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval to consider allowing fagade modifications to an existing commercial building and to consider site improvements including restri ing/ and the creation of two public portals as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the project is determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and WHEREAS,, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: I. The proposed development, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; Resolution No. 6858 ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 2 The proposal is a remodel of the existing retail building with no increase to the square footage. The remodel includes a new shade canopy at the existing entrance, the addition of a new entrance on the west elevation, an enhanced online pick up entrance on the south elevation toward the eastern edge of the building and a secondary online order pick up entrance on the east elevation, two new public plazas along Saich Way and Stevens Creek Blvd., new wall treatments and the integration of a mural on the existing building facade, restriping of parking stalls, and new landscaping and trees around the site. The elements of the proposal contributes to the overall improvement of public health, safey, general welfare, and convenience by providing public amenities. Therefore, the proposal will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 19.168, the General Plan any specific plan, zoning ordinances, applicable planned development permit, conditional use permits, variances, subdivision maps or other entitlements to use which regulate the subject property including, but not limited to, adherence.to the following specific criteria: a) Abrupt changes in building scale should be avoided. A gradual transition related to height and bulk should be achieved between new and existing buildings. Excepting where the proposed wood paneling highlights the entrances as focal points, the proposal does not change the overall building bulk and maintains the existing massing and scale. The wood paneling better distinguishes the entry points and the additional 2--6" height serves as a counter balance to the other proposed elements. The proposed increase in height at these areas is consistent with the zoning and the General Plan. The proposal improves and mitigates the existing massing of the building by utilizing different materials that define and divide the wall planes. b) In order to preserve design harmony between new and existing building and in order to preserve and enhance property values, the materials, textures and colors of new building should harmonize with adjacent development by being consistent or compatible with design and color schemes with the future character -of the neighborhoods and purposes of the zone in which they are situated. The location, height and materials of walls, fencing, hedges and screen planting should harmonize with adjacent development. Unsightly storage areas, utility installations and unsightly elements of parking lots should be concealed. The planting of ground cover or various types of pavements should be used to prevent dust and erosion, and the unnecessary destruction of existing healthy trees should be avoided. Lighting for development should be adequate to meet safety requirements as specified by the engineering and building departments, and provide shielding to prevent spill-over light.to adjoining property owners. Resolution No. 6858 ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 3 The building's mass and bulk remains unchanged and the proposed canopy and facade treatments utilizes materials that are consistent with a contemporary aesthetic. The proposal includes upgrading existing stucco walls with wood paneling, green screens, murals and materials that are compatiable with adjacent development. The location of utility and storage areas remain unchanged and located at the rear of the building. The proposal also includes planting of ground cover and trees along the building, between parking stalls where there are no existing trees, and enhanced paving is proposed at pedestrian walkways. Furthermore, existing trees in the parking lot and landscape areas are preserved to keep the mature canopies that exists on-site. Final lighting for the development will be reviewed with the construction documents to meet safety requirements while preventing spill-over light to adjacent properties. c) The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of outdoor advertising signs and structures have been designed to minimize traffic hazard, positively affect the general appearance of the neighborhood and harmonize with adjacent development. Signage approval is not included in this application d) With respect to new projects within existing residential neighborhoods, new development should be designed to protect residents from noise, traffic, light and visually intrusive effects by use of buffering, setbacks, landscaping, walls and other appropriate design measures. As part of the proposal the pedestrian experience along Saich Way and Stevens Creek Blvd will be improved by detaching the sidewalk from the curb and buffering the sidewalk with a landscape park strip. Additionally, the building abuts a multi family residential neighborhood and the proposal includes the installation of green screens to visually buffer and -improve the rear of the building. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the maps, facts, exhibits, testimony, staff's report and presentation, and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE.4 thereof,: The application for a Architectural and Site Approval, Application no. ASA -2018-01 is hereby approved and that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. ASA -2018-01 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of August 14, 2018 and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Resolution No. 6858 ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 4 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set drawn by Kimley-Horn entitled "Target Cupertino Store Remodel" consisting of twenty-five (25) sheets labeled as T1.1, C0.0, C0.1, C0.2, C1.0, C2.0, L1.0, L1.1, L1.2, L1.3, L1.4, L2.0, L2.1, L2.2, L3.0, L3.1, L3.2, A201, LP -103, and four renderings except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. ACCURACY OF PROTECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 3. ANNOTATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The conditions of approval set forth shall be incorporated into and annotated on the first page of the building plans. 4. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file nos. TR -2018-04 shall be applicable to this approval. 5. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS/TREATMENTS The final building exterior plan shall closely resemble the details shown on the original approved plans. Final building exterior treatment plan (including but not .limited to details on exterior color, materials, architectural treatments, doors, windows, lighting fixtures, and/or embellishments) shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits to ensure quality and consistency. Any exterior changes determined to be substantial by the Director of Community Development shall either require a modification to this permit or a new permit based on the extent of the change. 6. WINDOW DETAILS The frontage windows shall be kept open and transparent to the greatest extent possible. The final storefront design and window display shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits for tenant improvements. No changes shall be made to the transparency of the windows without the express approval of the Director of Community Development. Resolution No. 6858 ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 5 7. PROTECT AMENDMENTS The Planning Commission shall review amendments to the project considered major by the Director of Community Development. 8. LANDSCAPE PROTECT SUBMITTAL Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a full Landscape Documentation Package, per, sections 14.15.050 A, B, C, and D of the Landscape Ordinance, for projects with llandscape area 500 square feet or more or elect to submit a Prescriptive Compliance Application per sections 14.15.040 A, B, and C for projects with landscape area between 500 square feet and 2,500 square feet. The Landscape Documentation Package or Prescriptive Compliance Application shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits, and additional requirements per sections 14.15.040 D, E, F, and G or 14.15.050 E, F, G, H, and I will be required to be reviewed and approved prior to final inspections. 9. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION REPORT The project is subject to all provisions delineated in the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15). A landscape installation audit shall be conducted by a certified landscape professional after the landscaping and irrigation system have been installed. The findings of the assessment shall be consolidated into a landscape installation report. The landscape installation report shall include, but is not limited to: inspection to confirm that the landscaping and irrigation system are installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan, system tune-up, _system test with distribution uniformity, reporting overspray or run-off that causes overland flow, and preparation of an irrigation schedule. The landscape installation report shall include the following statement: "The landscape and irrigation system have been installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan and complies with the criteria of the ordinance and the permit." 10. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE Per the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15), a maintenance schedule shall be established and submitted to the Director of Community Development or his/her designee, either with the landscape application package, with the landscape installation report, or any time before the landscape installation report is submitted. a) Schedules should take into account water requirements for the plant establishment period and water requirements for established landscapes. Resolution No. 6858 ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 6 b) Maintenance shall include, but not be limited to the following: routine inspection; pressure testing, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system; aerating and de - thatching turf areas; replenishing mulch; fertilizing; pruning; replanting of failed plants; weeding; pest control; and removing obstructions to emission devices. c) Failed plants shall be replaced with the same or functionally equivalent plants that may be size -adjusted as appropriate for the stage of growth of the overall installation. Failing plants shall either be replaced or be revived through appropriate adjustments in water, nutrients, pest control or other factors as recommended by a landscaping professional. 11. SCREENING All mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be screened so they are not visible from public street areas or adjoining developments. Screening materials/colors shall match building features and materials. The height of the screening shall be taller than the height of the mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen. The location of equipment and necessary screening shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 12. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone cabinets and similar equipment shall be placed in underground vaults. The developer must receive written approval from both the Public Works Department and the Community Development Department prior to installation of any above ground equipment. Should above ground equipment be permitted by the City, equipment and enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping such I that said equipment is not visible from public street areas, as determined by the Community Development Department. Transformers shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. Signage is not approved with this use permit application. Signage shall conform to the City Sign Code. 13. LIGHTING On-site lighting must be in conformance with Cupertino Municipal Code Chapter 19.60 and 19.124 and automatic teller machine lighting, specifically, shall meet minimum standards required by the State of California Business and Professions Code. 14. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible, in accordance with the City's Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste under Chapter 16.72 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. The Resolution No. 6858 ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 7 applicant shall provide evidence that materials were recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 15. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 16. INDEMNIFICATION Except as otherwise prohibited by law, the applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its City Council, and its officers, employees and agents (collectively, the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void this Resolution or any permit or approval authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The applicant shall pay such attorneys' fees and costs within 30 days following receipt of invoices from City. Such attorneys' fees and costs shall include amounts paid to counsel not otherwise employed as City staff and shall include City Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. 17. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, _RESERVATIONS, OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain. fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINSTERED BY THE BUILDING DIVISION 1s. LOADING ZONE The applicant shall ensure that the proposed drive -up area must be marked as loading zone only on the construction plans. Resolution No. 6858 ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 8 SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINSTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 19. BUS STOP LOCATIONS The Developer shall coordinate with Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) on proposed and existing bus stop and shelter locations on Stevens Creek Blvd and Saich Way, and any temporary locations needed for construction. . Provide a letter of consent from VTA regarding ' the proposed bus stop improvements and/or any temporary bus stop locations or service interruptions. 20. STREET IMPROVEMENTS & DEDICATION Provide street frontage improvements and dedications along the project to the satisfaction of the Director, of Public Works. All land containing portions of public sidewalk shall be dedicated in fee to the City. Provide a typical 0,5 -foot offset from back of sidewalk for the right-of-way dedication along Stevens Creek Blvd, Saich Way, and Alves Drive. Sidewalk along Stevens Creek Blvd and Saich Way shall be replaced in accordance with the Heart of the City guidelines. Street improvements may include, but not be limited to, new detached sidewalk, new ADA ramp, driveways, storm drain lateral, street tree installations, and street light and/or pedestrian push button relocation. 21. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the Director of Public Works. The transition from monolithic to detached sidewalk shall be constructed per City Standard Detail 1-28. The southernmost driveway on Saich Way shall be narrowed to a width that is satisfactory to the Director of Public Works. 22. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS Developer shall provide pedestrian and bicycle related improvements (e.g. walkway and bicycle racks, etc.) consistent with the Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan and the Pedestrian Transportation Plan, and as approved by the Director of Public Works. This will include a contribution of $75,000 towards the future Stevens Creek Blvd Class IV Separated Bike Lanes. 23. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the Director of Public Works in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. Resolution No. 6858 ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 9 24. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. If the project increases the existing impervious area, hydrology and pre- and post - development hydraulic calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be constructed or renovated. The storm drain 'system may include, but is not limited to, subsurface storage of peak stormwater flows (as needed), improvements to impacted portions of the downstream City owned storm drain system, bioretention basins, Low Impact Development treatment facilities, vegetated areas, and hydrodynamic separators to reduce the amount of runoff from the site and improve water quality. The storm drain system shall be designed to detain water on-site (e.g., via buried pipes, retention systems or other approved systems and improvements) as necessary to avoid an increase of the ten percent flood water surface elevation to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Any storm water overflows or surface sheeting should be directed away from neighboring private properties and to the public right of way as much as reasonably possible. Any proposed connections to the City storm drain systems shall be designed to connect at manholes. All storm drain inlets shall be clearly marked with the words "No Dumping — Flows to Creek" using permanently affixed metal medallions or equivalent, as approved by the Environmental Programs Division. 25. C.3 REQUIREMENTS C.3 regulated improvements are required for all projects creating and/or replacing 10,000 S.F. or more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site). The developer shall reserve a minimum of 4% of developable surface area for the placement of low impact development measures, for storm water treatment, unless an alternative storm water treatment plan, that satisfies C.3 requirements, is approved by the Director of Public Works. Trees and plants within the treatment measures shall be consistent with the Plant List in the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program C.3 Stormwater Handbook, Appendix D. The developer must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMPs are each required. Resolution No. 6858 ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 10 All storm water management plans are required to obtain certification from a City approved third party reviewer. 26. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT, FEES AND BONDS The project developer shall obtain an encroachment permit prior to any work to commence within the public right-of-way and shall pay fees and bonds, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said fees shall be paid prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Storm Drainage Fee: d. Encroachment Permit Fee: e. Storm Management Plan Fee Bonds: Per current fee schedule ($823.70) Per current fee schedule ($2,825 or 6% of improvement costs) Per current fee schedule ($4,550 per AC) Per current fee schedule ($2,436.63 or 5% of improvement costs) Per current fee schedule ($1,208) Encroachment Bond: 100% of Off-site Improvements On-site Grading Bond: 100% of Site improvements The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 27. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Developer shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Agreement with the City prior to final occupancy. The Agreement shall include the operation and maintenance for non-standard appurtenances in the public road right-of-way that may include, but is not limited to, sidewalk, pavers, and street lights. 28. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Nater Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. Resolution No. 6858 ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 11 29. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT When and where it is required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the developer must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the SWRCB, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 30. EROSION CONTROL PLAN Developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 31. WORK SCHEDULE Every 6 months, the developer shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetable for all grading/erosion control work in conjunction with this project. 32. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. I The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 33. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. 34. DEDICATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS Developer shall "quit claim" to the City all rights to pump, take or otherwise extract water from the underground basin or any underground strata in the Santa Clara Valley. Resolution No. 6858 ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 12 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 2018, at the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: /s/Benjamin Fu Benjamin Fu Assist. Dir. of Community Development APPROVED: /s/Geoff Paulsen Geoff Paulsen Chair, Planning Commission Chapter 19.12.7170 of the Cupertino Municipal code provides for appeal of decisions made by the Planning Commission 1. Application ASA -2018-01, TR -2018-04, Jennifer Kirby (Target Corporation), 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd Architectural and Site Approval Permit to consider allowing facades modifications to an existing commercial building (Target) and site improvements including restriping, and the creation of two public portals along Stevens Creek Boulevard and Saich Way and a Tree Removal Permit, to consider allowing the removal and replacement of 43 protected development trees located within the proposed development area Action The Planning Commission approved the application(s) on a 5-0-0 vote Enclosures:. Planning Commission Report August 14, 2018 Planning Commission Resolution(s) 6858, 6859 Plan Set gplanning/Post Hearing/sunnnanj to cc081418 TR -2018-04 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6859 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE REMOVAL AND THE REPLACEMENT OF 43 PROTECTED DEVELOPMENT TREES, LOCATED AT 20745 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. (APN 326-32-005) SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TR -2018-04 Applicant: Jennifer Kirby (Kimley-Horn) Location: 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd. SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tree Removal Permit to consider allowing the removal and replacement of 43 Protected Trees, as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the project is determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: 1. That the location of the trees restricts the economic enjoyment of the property by severely limiting the use of property in a manner not typically experienced by owners of similarly zoned and situated property, and the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the approval authority that there are no reasonable alternatives to preserve the tree(s). The proposal is an update of an existing commercial retail building with no increase of the square footage. In order to accommodate for the new pedestrian -oriented entry plaza located Resolution No. 6859 TR -2018-04 August 14, 2018 Page 2 under the new winged canopy, walkways to public portal plazas, bioretention basins between parking spaces, and the subsequent restriping the existing trees cannot be prereserved in their location. The applicant proposes replacement trees throughout the site in conformance with the Municipal Code Ordinance requirements and proposes to locate the replacements where tree coverage is needed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the maps, facts, exhibits, testimony, staff's report and presentation, and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 2 thereof,: The application for a Tree Removal Permit, Application no. TR -2018-04 is hereby approved and that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. TR -2018-04 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of August 14, 2018 and are incorporated by reference as though -fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set drawn by Kimley-Horn entitled "Target Cupertino Store Remodel" consisting of twenty-five (25) sheets labeled as T1.1, C0.0, C0.1, C0.2, C1.0, C2.0, L1.0, L1.1, L1.2, L1.3, L1.4, L2.0, L2.1, L2.2, L3.0, L3.1, L3.2, A201, LP -103, and four renderings except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. ACCURACY OF PROTECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 3. ANNOTATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The .conditions of approval set forth shall be incorporated into and annotated on the first page of the building plans. 4. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. ASA -2018-01 shall be applicable to this approval. Resolution No. 6859 TR -2018-04 August 14, 2018 Page 3 2. TREE REPLACEMENT SIZE The applicant shall provide adequate tree replacements for trees proposed to be removed in conformance to the replacement guidelines per Cupertino Municipal Code Section 14.18.160. The size of the proposed replacement trees shall be modified as follows to be consistent with the City's Protected Tree Ordinance unless deemed. infeasible by the City's Consulting Arborist: a. Diameter of trunk size of removed tree up to 12 inches shall be replaced with one 247inch box tree; b. Over 12 inches and up to 36 inches shall be replaced by two 24 -inch box tree or one 36 -inch box tree; and c. Over 36 inches shall be replaced with one 36 -inch box tree. If it is determined that it is physically not feasible to plant the required replacements trees, the Applicant may pay in -lieu fees determined to be appropriate by the Community Development Director. 3. ARBORIST REVIEW Prior to building permit issuance, the number, location and species of trees shall be reviewed and approved by the City in consultation with the City's Consulting Arborist. The replacement trees shall be planted prior to building permit final. The Applicant shall provide the Department of Community Development adequate documentation, including, but not limited to, photographs, receipts or invoices, to verify that replacements have been planted. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the trees after planting and a report ascertaining the good health of the trees mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy. 4. TREE PROTECTION As part of the demolition or building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall be prepared by a certified arborist for the trees to be retained. In addition, the following measures shall be added to the protection plan: ® For trees to be retained, chain link fencing and other root protection shall be installed around the dripline of the tree prior to any project site work. ® No parking or vehicle traffic shall be allowed under root zones, unless using buffers approved by the Project Arborist: ® No trenching within the critical root zone area is allowed. If trenching is needed in the vicinity of trees to be retained, the City's consulting arborist shall be consulted before any trenching or root cutting beneath the dripline of the tree. Resolution No. 6859 TR -2018-04 August 14, 2018 Page 4 ® Wood chip mulch shall be evenly spread inside the tree projection fence to a four -inch depth. ® Tree protection conditions shall be posted on the tree protection barriers. ® Retained trees shall be watered tomaintain them in good health. ® A covenant on the property shall be recorded that identifies all the protected trees, prior to final occupancy. The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified arborist prior to issuance of building permits. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the trees to be retained and shall provide reviews prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits. A report ascertaining the good health of the trees mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy. 5. PROTECTED TREES The applicant understands that the replacement trees may not be removed without a Tree Removal Permit and that they shall be responsible for ensuring the proper maintenance and care of the trees. The applicant shall also disclose the location and species of all replacements trees on site upon sale of the property. 5. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 6. INDEMNIFICATION Except as otherwise prohibited by law, the applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its City Council, and its officers, employees and agents (collectively, the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void this Resolution or any permit or approval authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The applicant shall pay such attorneys' fees and costs within 30, days following receipt of invoices from City. Such attorneys' fees .and costs shall include amounts paid to counsel not otherwise employed as City staff and shall include City Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. Resolution No. 6859 TR -2018-04 August 14, 2018 Page 5 7. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS, OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 2018, at -the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: /s/Benjamin Fu Benjamin Fu Assist. Dir. of Community Development APPROVED: /s/Geoff Paulsen Geoff Paulsen Chair, Planning Commission TARGET CUPEPRT INO STORE REMODEL VICINITY MAP SCALE: N.T.S. PROJECT CONTACTS OWNER ARCHITECT ENGINEERING(CIVIL) & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TARGET CORPORATION WD PARTNERS KIMLEY-HORN 1000 NICOLLET MALL 7007 DISCOVERY BLVD 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO ST. SUITE 250 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 DUBLIN, OHIO 43017 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 TEL 614.634.7000 TEL 669.800.4130 CONTACT: DAVID BIRNBAUM CONTACT: MILES JOHNSON CONTACTS AGENCY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORRE AVENUE ADMINISTRATIVE HEADQUARTERS 10300 TORRE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 14700 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD CUPERTINO, CA 95014 TEL 40B.777.320B LOS GATOS, CA 95032 TEL 408.777.3200 PLANNING@CUPERTINO.ORG PHONE: (408) 3784010 INFO@SCCFD.ORG BUILDING DEPARTMENT 10300 TORRE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 TEL' 408.777.3228 BUILDING@CUPERTINO.ORG SCOPE OF WORK SITE WORK • BUILDING FRONTAGE SIDEWALK PAVING & LANDSCAPE PLANTERS • ENHANCED SIDEWALK PAVING ALONG STEVENS CREEK AND SAICH WAY • MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING BUS SHELTER • PARKING LOT PAVING WILL BE CLEANED AND RE -STRIPED • NEW EV PARKING STALLS • DRIVE -UP LANE ALONGSIDE BUILDING • EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN ALONG STEVENS CREEK WUL BE REFACED WITH TARGETS LATEST BRAND DESIGN. FACADE MODIFICATIONS • ALL THE ENTRIES WILL BE CHARACTERIZED BY WOOD LIKE FINISHES AND INCREASED GLAZING FOR VISIBILITY INTO THE STORE. • NEW BULLSEYE SIGNS WILL BE LOCATED ON 3 FACADES AT THE BUILDING ENTRY POINTS • IN FRONT OF THE WEST ENTRY THERE WILL BE A LANDSCAPED PLAZA THAT WILL HAVE SEATING FOR STARBUCKS PATRONS AND GUESTS TO RELAX AND PROVIDE A BREAK FROM SHOPPING. • A NEW ORDER PICK-UP ENTRY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING FOR GUESTS. SHEET LIST TABLE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE T1.1 TITLE SHEET CO.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS C0.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C0.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1.0 SITE PLAN C20 PRELIMINARY SWCP, GRADING S DRAINAGE PLAN L7.0 ARBORIST REPORT Ll.1 ARBORIST REPORT L72 ARBORIST REPORT L1.3 TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN L1A TREE MANAGEMENT NOTES B DETAILS L20 LANDSCAPE PLAN L7.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.2 LANDSCAPE NOTES 73.0 BIKE CIRCULATION PLAN L3.1 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN L32 VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN A201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LP -103 SITE LIGHTING of TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimleyo Horn , 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 1/03118 Entitlements SubmRtal1 323118 Enfitlements SubmNtal2 020118 Enttlamet Submiltal3 G� C� V m� Y� W rn z �Q UV F- to 0 ��I WzZ � �w D j u U LO �. CN N O Pm,eot N'mber T-0323 Pmt': Vemlon: C'Mg: Designed BY J. Kirby Cheeked BY M. Johnson TITLE SHEET lJ�o� LEGEND PROPERTY LINE AOJACEMPROPCIVUrIE CEVURUNE EASFMEM- BUIU]INo MNE - - ---� - - BUILDING OVERHANG FOU NDMONUMEMASNOUD f.UND IRON flPEOR AS.- BOWLRDULHT LIGHT ---------•-_._.-_. [ an G t•-� J-•-<- STREETUGHr u-- 1MFFlC SIGNAL FOIE TRANSFORMER N.6 FIRE HYDRANT STORM DRAIN MANHOLE MANHOLE CLEAN CUT R O O GAS METER U'Am pOLE Wi GUV VANE VALVE CATCH BASIN 'DROP INLET .AM METER m i ---- S .O E' FlREDEPARiMENTCONNECTION `y IITIIT'BOX 612E VPR161 [� SOULARD NNLE55 0THEAWMESPECRETH SIGN T TRLEREPOR'EKCEPIONNUMBER D TREEWJSUE ANDU VATION CURB CURB 6 GUREA CONCRETE FENCE EDGE OF PAVfMFM SANRABY EERIER sm. OR.UN EXCEPTION TABLE I.Ge... I endMeclat-a mdassessments for he Rtai year 2nl S-2016,, Ile, had TheFolloenng Maters AHect Parcel Four, y. dVe SURVEY wEY MAATTW NOT A SU IS.C.-..oudIdons,.1111.10.1 add .soman. In the d......eerded February 14.1972 as Balk 9702, Peg, 170 of OM,W Records, whllh PlAst that a 2. The ileo of special taz seed pursuant so Gam, 2.5 O.Ron. n9 stash Se.lon Wolman Lameofshaln.def.sorrender lmilldleaflmoraMnrst......... 53311 of Me Uleomp C --dams Code for Community FadU"'F Olamm No. 200541, es 11111-d by Notice of 5pMlal Tu Us. rewrded June 24, 2005 of deed of twit matte in good pith and Mr Value. hot daledin Anycovenant,-dnion or na.40 On Indicting a nef-Roo, Ura edon or di-I-atisn based on rue, War, hoon-sem No. 18438516 of Olfidal Records. NOT A SURVEY MATTEW religion, I- handicap, Iam.ai status. national edgin, sexual pelentaGon, made[ s ah-". somas of income or diabilov. to he eatentsush mwnama, 21 The Ilan of specialtusssused pursuantro[Mpter 2.5 wmmenUnq weM Califoml...... Code for Ce. -by FadllGes Dlsvin No. condili... CI111 vinlae Title 42, Section 3604(4. of the United States Codes or5,0en 32955 pf he CallfornM Government Cade-WNul res&ctlOnsuM.suse and federal them Me age of,,wp,M In 5.11d, housing er housing for aid,, persons Secdon S3311 of the ent 2013-1, eYdIed dby Nada of SptcMl Ta,UtntecoWed)anum22.201qu 51,01 nor be esnstwed Is estrOdato based en E.111.1 staves. Instrument No.22502S3S of Offidal ReeNA pe ons,J dedadnp metllna[Ipns hereof reerded April N. 1917 u Book C713. NOT A SURVfl' MATTER) Page 656 0( OMd,l Records. 3... Ileo of wml<menel taxes, ro the extent resulting hem changes in rnnenhip ns &.nsWNpn an o...... he dee of heto Me dReso.s. cions hereof rccoNed May 12,1917 as Oook C82 1. -nopursuant p-do.,nCM1awmr].5l.mmencing with Seclian >S)ef he Res'enue and Taxation Cotte of Me State of "Mr, Page 324 &OMcia Ree&a. PRB. 32nNf 0Aid NOT FLOTTABLW (NOT A SURVEY MATTER _ 16. This item has been lnamicnaly dalded. Tne FollaNnp Mrtters Agect Kral One: l i. COvenmts, entlitions, TMW.lani, easements, ass.smen., IienF themes, terms O. A lea, date) M.01.1962, ex.uhd M Luster Realty, Inc.,, Deluvare corparatidn and p-ivw In he daso I loo dud April 23.1990 u 29, Book UPage 1699 of u lessor and W cky 5-1, Inc, a Colifsme. cm"Veal n a' leu., ncadm AudM iO. 1962 as Book 5618, Vogt 544;uamended bythm arum Ammtlment to tease dated OfBcW Records, vMich prwlde that a vblatlon therwl atoll not defeat gr ander lien&a-mr,mon9a9e or deedof,Indlotog pool fr-,ntlfpat. 1uty 29, 5967 and memprlellzed Mthat u,ein M¢mprandum of runendmemto Leaze butdeeM1e restd.ionl.h-tea-1.1 but deleting any eased.. ,corded asdocument9442223:mdasnmmded byhatcmal.Amendmmt.-to Lege dated February A. Ina.. u an".dellzrtl by Load ..In Me....U. of a' us, Yearn or tliudminatipn lased on rice, color, religion,Sex. haMicap, famllul status, wtiowl 11. 11. edoln, sexual oduted..' hArlt-tiros, ancestry, spur[, of In.., or d - 111N., Amendment No.2 and Amendment Na a le Lea, recorded as dowmem 14308512; mendedMha'enaln Amendment Np.3to lease detmJuly 14, 1998,u in,,. AtsucbmVa... N, conditions or 11detans Vblrte Tide 42, S,Olm 3604(4. of the UnitedM.es,,hns.Idq,dI...ER; uderhamesodfederal law on theage mor1a11adMhatceruln Mnt 143051 of A,nendment No. band Amendment Na. 3to Lease tla da asthat analp ofodshadsbas senior Muling ar Housing for Oder wnona shall not ba constwetlu for resMNons based on hmiilal su[us. tNo.4tas dated D-R512-amdas, Au .1 CHOW nt No.4 to teaze dated 0eamber 8, 1998, recordetlazdowmem 14570649 of Omciil Records, Documents) dededng mpdmomone hereof recorded May 28, 2(104 as Document No. 2 coda Bedard,17816 OB afO Ams, wmbrenres or othmf maters a8e.in heleasehpid estaro wh.hcr rent p MOT PLOWABLE) m;tA,Shm., hewn by 1,C publk mcords. NMA SURVEY MATTER) 18. This dem has been imentlonelly tleletetl S. TheeHe. of the fallowlnp: DecLvatlon or Ares&Nms mtlAOrcemmiso Teminae 19. Thetems,Drodslons and euemendsl wnalned In he dowmem entitletl Former Iatlon of 0.eeti.lons.dmed Deamywr 1, 1911, M1oM Seth et aL and 'Easement P9reement'rewrdedluty29, 199Raz Dawment No. 14308513 ofOmcW Lust. ""It. Inc Isomled Fathoms, 14,1972 1. Book 9702, Page 170, WhOsl Rewrd'.Amendment No. l In DCdusso. of Rutdctions dated M of Desem30. Amen, (MEMEHEAEDM M .-ber 1976.MJob, Such -W. Sua1GHL Realty Funds. and Lucky Stores, int ra..Itl Ap6l4,1977[,Bmkl;13,P,ge656.OMc]al Rewrds. Coro -Agreement. 20.M easement fpr Sidewalk antl lnddenW pusmus,reeNed SeptemN.r22, 1998 as Documem Na 114859/9 o0Mdd RewNs. ba - f. Ory of CupeNno Dedmadon of Resm.done deted May 9, 1977, M Norco Asede., a Centeno, partnership rc,,M,d May 12. 19771. Book C821. Page 324, OMdal Aecotds (E....ENEfdN.1DHEREOM (NOF PLOrt Q 21,Water dshu.[tams atitleto wafer, whether or not shm. Mt he p.blk records. 6. This Item has been Insentlonaly sinned. b2. ThN item he' been ene ths.day Island. 7. IN 111 adpwmrnt enhled'O¢ciarallon of Cor -mu. Conditions and ReslMlan' and Gram se If Easements', -ad by and betwen eSt-Creek/Cuwdino.......%.-Id. Z3. Th41tem has been intvntlonally tleletetl. AM' 23, Ile. as Book U29. Page 1699 of 29. The failming matt[. Eisdoaed M an ALTA/AGSM survey matt<M DRC MFldil mo, , indudlno bra not limned to - n..-dltims, readOlens, men., """'mu, Tuns And chanes. Engln.dnq. Int on May 4, 2015. dWa.ted Job No. 15-81& .--nen) Faded, motOflatt-'hereof re< ad May 28, 2001 as Instrument No, 17816208 or OfflclaI RecOrde. parcel lour. NO Survey Matters N OTPLOTTABLO 25. Arty dalm that he This is sublett to a Nus[ w Lim created underThe Perishable B.M eazement shown or dedl[aud on the map of Pagel MapreeNed Aa1123.1990 Alan! CommvdiUes Act 1930h US.0 499, else Jor the Pedsen and antl an Al. In Book 613, P,ge 7 antl e, of Eased Mads. For. Public service Easement SbckyWSPaIT U.S.C.441Bi .seq,I or untle§similar stale taws. d i. -hit pu,Fosei. (EASEMEM5 PLOTTED NFREOA) 9. Thls Ie. has been ...... 11, ECIe[ed. 10. The Terms, Pro "mH end Luoded'(1Bg9ss .Nd In the dowmm eeAdded n[Agreement' .corded July 29, I.MbV nt Ha. 1430951-a of Omsla Reco ds. (EASEMENT PLOTTED HEREON) "A" ..N. -I - Had -11, antl Mtid-i purowes, -nded SEPTEMUR 22.1998 u Inst- t N,.14405m9 of OffidIIRewrds. In FsVd ref: CAy,NCMpmIA, a-Uss-PLOTTED HEREDM 12. A tlaed of Wet to severe an priglnal Intlebtetlneis of 59,000.000.00 recpNed December 19,2008.Imtsument Np.2nOJ3492 of Oflidil Rec.ds. Deed: Oec¢mbtr l 0,2008 TrostanStevms[ree4/CupeNno Asspdaas LLCaCAlllpmla llmitetl liability company TeuSae: Flat AmedonTne lnsuan¢ComwnY flenefldary: Amada.. End .1. 1 -nose C.Inudy 0owmen[ a-rccmded O.ober 13, 2009 as Instrument No. 20/63621 of OMCW ae[nrds. INC, ASURVEY MATRRI 'Absolute AINII.m.l rte.. Lee Oeumbar A document mimedof ud ---orders tlof the Indebted secured M the deed of trmtas tldniona sewriryfor h, P"Rent (NOTA SURVEY MATTER) 13. The fOlMwing marten disclosed Man ALTAJACSM survey come M DRC Englnee.Ito. Inc. on May 4.2005, design -d Job No. 15-81 a: Parcel One; The -rd... landed as 'r at he -head, cora. of Parcel One enmeshes about S' intp the.mer of :he bu art". 14. Thle hem has been intentlually tleletetl. LEGAL DESCRIPTION The land rete,nd to m this Commitment Is sIW sed In the Ch, of Cupertino, Co.., & Sans, Oars, SUte of Calilo.da, and is dasplbed as folM : FARCELONE PARCO.1 M SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP FILED N THE OFFICE OF THE ROOD MCFTHEMUNTYOFMWACLAPASTAnOF=FOMMt AMIL23. 19901N BOOK 613, OF MAPS, PALES, 7 AND B. PARCEL TYO: EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE ERECTION AND MAINTENANCE ON THE FOLLOVANG DESCRIBED PARCLLOF LAND A SIGNOR SIGNS ADVT:RTSINGTfE COMMERCIALACT ZCA MONUPONWEABOVEDESCRIBEDPARCELMLA.NO, AS.I- BEGINNING ATA POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY UNE CF PARI( AVENUE, AS SAID UNE WAS ESTABUSHEO BY DEED FROM -A MICH ET AL TO CRY OF CUPFBTINO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DATED OCTOBER 26, 1961 RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 1961 IN BOOK 5350 OFFICIAL RECORDS. PALE 740, SANTA OARA COUNTY RECORDS. DISTANTTHEREON NORTH BB' 56' 55" EAST 707.59 FEET FROM THE POINT OF IMfERSECTONTHERMFWITHTHEEASTERLYUNEOFTHATC AN10.51ACRE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN ME OW FROM ANTON SAICH ETALTO LUCKY STORES, INC, A MRMMnON, DATEO OCTOBER 27, 1961, RECORDED NOVEMBER 3, 1961 IN BOOK 5352 OFfICIFL RECORDS, PACE466, SANTA CEARACOUNTY RECORDS: THENCEFROM SAID MIM OF BEGINNMG SDM 0'06' 43" FAST3MM FEET; WMM NORTH89'SES'S5"EAST38.00F SONTHEPOINTOFINTERSECTIONTHEREOF WRH THE WESTERLYLINEOFSU ID-SUNNWAtEROADASSAIDUNEWAS A ITTINISNCDBYO®TOSAID CT'OF IEOTHEL ABOVEMATAIGT0:THENCE NORTHERL6N48" AN Ani AAC)USOF3MMLEFT.FROMATANLEMBEARINL OF 6TH 0'06' 48' WEST WITH A RADIUS OF 37.00 FEET, THROUGH I CENTMLANGLE SO 69' 56' IN, FOF PWA DISTANCE OF 47.09 FEETTO'. POINTINTHE SAID SOUTHERLYMNE OFPARKAVENUE:TH EM] OFEECINN.SS"MSTRLONGSAID UST MENTIONED ONE 8D0 FEET TDTHE POINTOF BEGINNING, AS SURVEYED NJUN[ 1962 BY PAUFIC ENGINEERS, CIWL ENGINEERS AND SURVEY016. PAlO ALTO, uufoRNIA M GRANTED BY AMOK SAICH AND OHN MICH. MARRIED MEN TO LUCKY MM INC A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 0Y INSTRUMENT S. T 7.1961 RECORDED OVE NMBERS 19611N BOOK 53520FFlCIALRECORpS PAGE 968. PARCUTHREE RIGHTS AND EASEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE DECIAFATON OF COVFNPNTS. CDROM NSANORESTRICTIONSAVDGRANTOFEASEMENTSRFLORDEDAPRIL23, 1990 M BOOK 1329, PALE 1699.OFFICIAL RECORW AHD COMM -AND AMENDMEMTODECLARATONUCOVENANTS,CMDMONSANDgEST ONSAND GRANTOF EASEMENTS RECORDED MAY 28. 2004 AS DOCUMENT NO.17816200. OFFICIAL RECORDS. MEPTI G FROM PJACULT1REEANTSUCH RIGHTSAND EASEMENTS LOCATED ON PARCEL ONE, ABOVE PARCEL FOUR: PARCEL 2 AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP FILED IN TIE OFFICE OF ME RECOROMOFTEMUNIYOFSAMALURA,STATEOFCAUFOWN ONAPRIL23, 19901N BOOK 613, OF MAPS, FACES) 7 AND 8. ABBREVIATIONS AC ASPHALTCCONCRETE ACP MAISTOSCEMENTPIPE AD AREAURAIN BL WILDING the BACK DE VIA. CB CATCH BASIN CIF CHAIN UNK FENCE CO CLEANOMTOGRADE COMM COMMUNICATION CONC CONCRETE DI DROP INLET DOC DOCUMENT E EAST - CB ELECTRIC BOX ECAB ELECTRIC CAB INET .- EASEMENT w ELECTRIC VAULT MY WGEOFW= EC FACE OF CURB FDC FlREOEPARTAIENTCONNECTION FF FINI5N FLOOR M FAAEIIYAn- FL FLOW LINE .0 FOUND EDB EUROPDCBOX FEW I FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE FSA FIRE5PRINKEERAUaM GEN GENERATOR UI IRRIGATION BOK INV NVEJUELEVATON UP LIP OF CUTTER MN MANHO E MON MINDMElIT N NORTH HE E NOME,!M 0. NUMBER MV NORTBYEST O.R. OFFACI RECORD PN MSTINOICATOR VALVE I PROPERTY UNE (PP) PER PLAN M.E. YUBMCURVICEEAREMEM RIM RIM EI£/ATION RWL RAIN WA TfR LEADER 5 SOUTH EEHH STORNDRAIN MANHOLE EE SOUTHEAST SL STREET UGNT SU-UTMGHT- '0.' SQUARE FEET SS SANRABY UYEIR 55C0SANRAa,S- CLEAN OM "" SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SW SOUTHWEST TB TELEPHONEBOX TC TOP OF CURB TMH TELEPHONE MANHOLE nit TRAFFIC SIGNAL 80X TWTOPOFWALL TVP. T"I UBIJFIMrY BOX UCP. UTIITY CABINET UE UTILITY ENCLOSURE W WET WB IYATFA BOX NDEt DRIVE ' G0.FAN1£AF ' �T' ai DRIVE � o NOTES 1. All diardeo, shown hereon.e In feet and dathoUs sh-of. 2. This survey was prepared rroM Information furnished In a Commismmt for TUI. Inant"Orep,, MFlrstnmerlan Ttle Insuranu CsmwnY,tla&M.y. 4, 20i S. AmeIWetl S-15-1 S.Order No. HCS -618032{C NOIlab1lNyb Asmmed for nobsed,of Tawrd n. stated In said Commdment for Title Insurance that may. alfecthe bwndary Anne, exceptions, or.femen. a0eals,p the ".P.M. 3. Physlal Norms'hewn" I" wrveyaa I-PNI oMnla Items Wpble as N HR, dao&Mls nny.. 5ub1.11-sures rcs, dant', are11. not shownwitn Mr. Tines hive been ceml plled hom) awutlllty llable plude,s, onaings and 11 hadsede, but ea not Iimlmdttownrew o, tfamin hp. s mttUNI subsurface ob)ew y. slabs, ihodnq,.unl d has utlll -ed E, plolns u....rd a. ranks,.0 anyother U.. YAece -'an, not rexed Masle 111InapI,ha. Theuse this 141rd M9b.111ag, 'nor abk w laca[e he fire servltt line that servltts this exlso.9 building, 4. A.P.N.: 326-32-0556326-32-056 S. ZonlnNo.: This survey makes m -ftn n as to compliance wdh [oder, and Wilding old, amyprordl.mc. other than when' manWpal 1,111dln9 unud Ilan louden'. The subject papCM 1,.rrerdly-Nd '-,t of the CM SDoOk an Arta^ Planned DeVelepment The,.cont bulldln9 setbacks far his,ming du,rMidd are per be Manned DealoOmen[ permit cumnM on fllCwlth he Gry of Cuwrtlno pvming DepmmenL Information was obtained! form he CM of Upers.n. Plmning D' "nut Webalte on RAW 7. 2016. 6. But' of eeadngs: hearing aring or North OW!2r Eazs taken on Ma em erliw of SaMWey u sI- onthacerasinFarcelM filed hrreco&mA 12314901. and of kM W m p In es)68 Santa ClaaCoun Reco&ssas Mken as the &[sls olill eeann s 9 ry 9 In- M1erem. 7. no.... No. The lobj-papenv is sh-on the Fed.alfm. an, Ma..gemmt Agency Flood In'u st. Rale Map. Community P,nCI Numbed 060339 0208 H, weed May la, 2009,.' being loafed In FIood Zane'%': AaM of 0.2%ad... I than[. Flood. u,M & 1%annual chance Dodd , tb 0mage tln 1ofIMThen1fp.er wih drelnage arta less hen 1s quire mile; end utas Pmte.ed M levee' from Isim.nd dunce flood. I.Nneanon waz obtained from he FEMA websi[. (AM,,.Hd .gw) on ARN16. 2016. 9. There was no observable evidence of -1, an -B work Wall., ens -en, or bottling aJdItlmu M Me time of the - 10. There are no proposed Mmq. In ercet right of way lint at the time &the s. -Y. Thm. Yna alio no eMmAnd.Mml. of teas. a-. or Gd.s^alk .-U.- or repalr5. 12. Asofhe time of WE, a- the,. was no.-Veble eVirem" oany ""I"dn .10d.he ba -me, of the aebHot prowrry and Me survey. was nos provided w10, aM Infemedon, dowmenudon Mat dleeldead Mar my -1-1 may 111 Ir,hill be noted MM the and -19.1E Und Sury 111 n. quaked. maks An In''usiemjddgment d.Crminatlm as an what does. does not hntls arta. Further reNew of the CAAfmdI Department&Fish andme sG -ban, dlscl0,M s at N dos not Mos, any wetlands edeas wlhin he aubje. propmY. 13. BenhmaM: Sane Clare Valley War. D11111et.135; Breda Disk is a RESET. lowed il- 14 feet bah ns! the Nonbetty e f the wmhwe.edy EC.dwdl 0- Creek Boule,aid and Calabasas CrceW, along Me msem brick edge, 4.5 fe.,Mee he Ndexalk Fa,ment. CM of Cupmhto. Elevation: I -W UNVD80 Damm) 14. This Ism-Fagnmed uMoo s r,000sedM&, phot.mmmetdcmatlmdfI, Mira-.bra,int,I.Union QW.001f..N ineaueldens[v.mUon. Photo9aphy was Ma , 29, 2016fa Job W. UMC03-201L 018. studend"L Tse due & ' d PARKING SUMMARY OESCKIFIION - IPARCELONE PNICD.FOUR TOTAL ........................ .. _""A_ ...J. __--__-__.._..__..-.....__....a.........._........:....._............. COMPAR FARKING 0 __...._...__...........__.....__-.-..q..._... �...__.a�_ ACCESSIBLE PARRING 1 11 D 11 TOTAL 61 S97 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE T0: WD PARTNERS, INCD. FIRS' AND. ,soThis Iswunity-20ltmaporpinsandhe DeLaIR 1 -It Isbasedweremade In This S,nce with Mn 2016 Minimum Stanched berill Regtd KPnts farALTnJN5P5 wntl The 5, Rb)a.lo' 1)(1), 7UHed and adopted M ALTA antl HSPS, and Indudu tt<ms .2. 3.4, aid- 71x.'sno )lded E, 9,1 1.1 13,14,16, 17.1 8, and 19 of Table Athnrepf. 1. laid work was �ompletw mA.it 20; 2016. i� Al'9 3. DATE APRIL i SCALE N DRAB 100 All OF 3 SH USERq... LSPROJECTSWIg056104V-UFP, Y TAe-TAseB APIALME011 1242PM Z z V I& TARCCTo 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOUS, MN 65,103 Kimlep0orn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 1103118 Enfillements Submittal 1 323/15 Entitlements Submittal 2 620118 Eniftlernanda Submittal 3 GO Uj r) J U m� `1 0 O LU LU UU F- rn o z z \1 > LLj LU a W W D U �v O N 0 Project Number T-0323 Probe: I Version: Contig: Designed By J. Kirby Checked By M,Johnson EXISTING CONDITIONS c- Voff - SNOURIN03 ONUSIX3 uosuqor-" AS P.M..40 Aqj!)i 'r As P.O61..a :Bp.31 :UOIWOA CZEO—i --N 1O -1-d O u C—'), m C— m ;u T < M :d m 0 cn bo >;oZ CI to m 0 C.nm - aW 0> %lip rn �l 00 NV -1d),3)1 '1332115 Oc3 osz mins NVN213JNVS1S3MOGl ujoH<((AajLurA COK9 NVVsnodVBNNM MMITMOOINOOM N g6FM Er . � I. ;a ^[,ZQo as RZ A* Ho 2_X .......... . ......... .... :11 �m Y f to, IIH:)-LVV4 i LLv J .33HS 33S E J33 33S �. N MI V ..... ........... 41 .......... .................... ............. 11.11, .............. ............ie.......... . .......... .......... .v4-0 Wk, -dycl ago ISO 4 . .. ........ rf j 1x.......... . . ...... 5_,qn sv ..... ...... "4 DNIWInSAVO15NO _VwA331p 5N31315s .. .......... .4 x .... .. ....... ... . ....X . .......... S TARGET® 1000ET MALL MINNEAAPOLISPOUS, MN 55403 jmley»)Horn 100 WEST SAN PERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 1/03/78 Mitlements SobmMell 323/18 allemenb Sebmlttel2 820/78 EntHlomems SubmIM3 �0, N� \O� GO ♦ i'� U J Lu v m� Y o W � I— cn cr Q Luzz W j P' O F- W CO� U �� C) 0 N • Pmfed Number T-0323 Pmt.: I Vemlon: I Contig: Designed By J. Kirby Ch..k.d 8y M.Johnson EXISTING CONDITIONS CO,2_ LEGEND CUPERTINO REQUIREMENTS laal�" ISI RIGHT OF WAY & PROPERTY UNE MINIMUM OF 10% OF ANY PARKING LOT AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED. ifI i S Use n WQ .. •"' •""' _ w - - CENTERLINE MINIMUM PLANTER DIMENSION 4' WIDTH/LENGTH OR 25 SF. _ - - - - ALVES DRIVE - _ - ------------ LIMIT OF WORK MINIMUM OF 4' WIDE PLANTING STRIP BETWEEN ROWS OF PARKING. o — fppllBLIC5 _ T12EET1 — - - - MINIMUMOF 4' WADE PLANTING STRIP BETWEEN BUILDING OR WALKS AND @ RIW _ 24 EX. DRIVEWAY 6 —�—� SAWCUT UNE PARKING ROWS. _._ ___.__._._._... _...__..._._....._�—. —� -- — •----- ��,-,,,,�.w�--•--•-•••--•- _ --- _ CONCRETE SIDEWALK PERIMETER - MINIMUM OF 3 LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITHIN LOT UNE. :�-� ,,.. ..''^�-.. ...... ,, , ...:.......... .. - ��.----••—.. , PERIMETER MIN MUM OF 6 WIDE IS NE -f-•.€ t I.. ... ,.- -----......._...........L'•_.....___^--'- - r��sz'&eis�;. ASPHALT PAVEMENT �€ff 1 Ili'j��� j�(j jj(j' ____________ ,s,�i,�� PERIMETER - AT ROW 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND 3' HIGH SCREEN ,6 , .i, , , ``,, WALL/FENCE/PLANTING. IF PLANTING MUST REACH 2' HEIGHT WITHIN 18 4- •,U U : '"' , ", 1.11 CONCRETE PAVERS MONTHS. P. 5 `' STEVENS CREEK BLVD. - MINIMUM 10' WIDE CURBSIDE PLANTING STRIP AND -- - '•e••-•-� TRUNCATED DOMES ,,,• .,,,,, ,�,, 3 6' SIDEWALK AND MINIMUM OF BACK OF WALK PLANTING STRIP MINIMUM OF •:• -' I^,' j+ Q LANDSCAPE 10'. • ".. �r-_, C ! �� �i ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES - MINIMUM 5' PLANTING AREA 4 '' BIORETENTION AREA ADJACENT TO FENCE (MIN. 6' -MAX 8') OR WALL WITH EVERGREEN TREES AT 25' O.C. ? ENHANCED PAVING 29 17 12 ` _ ,� SEPARATION OF PARKING FROM BUILDING - MINIMUM 3' WIDE PLANTING AND „T _ i , 4•• E^ 11 MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE SIDEWALK. HEAT ISLAND REDUCTION - AT LEAST 50% OF NON PLANTED AREA IS TO BE SHADED. IF BY TREES, WITHIN 15 YEARS OF GROWTH. \ a a 1 35 4 MINIMUM OF 10% OF PARKING LOT AREA IS TO BE PLANTING. 4 - KEY NOTES MINIMUM OF 2.59.OF GROSS FLOOR AREA TO COMMON OPEN SPACE. 1 34-- O1 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. ONE TREE PER EVERY 5 PARKING STALLS. 5 TYP. REMOVE GRAPHICSXISTING MONUMENT SIGN AND REPLACE WITH UPDATED PROPOSED REMOVABLE BOLLARDS. PARCEL 1 1 i ........ I 8.258±ACRES! ® CLEAN AND RESTRIPE EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING LOT. CONFIGURATION OF PARKING STALLS TO MATCH EXISTING. 20745 STEVENS CREEK BLVD I I �:-- I r •4� -'� 4� CLEAN AND RESTRIPE EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING LOT. PROPOSED CONFIGURATION OF PARKING STALLS AS SHOWN. PROPOSED CURB. PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS. PROPOSED STORE ENTRANCE ;!I 5 r aY 1 � © PROPOSED LANDSCAPED ENTRANCE PLAZA. 4 9 PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO PUBUC RIGHT-OF-WAY. O DECRETIVE CONCRETE ✓ ;, / / 10 PROPOSED EV CHARGING STALLS (31 TOTAL). 6,0' /// / 11 EXISTING BUS SHELTER AND SIGNAGE I i // A/ 12 EXISTING TRASH COMPACTOR TO REMAIN. 18 2D417 15 ! nP 5 / ( I f/ PROPOSED DRIVE UP LANE. 18 - J(1 / 13 PARKING TABLE - PARCEL 1 EXISTING REQUIRED PROVIDED REGULAR 517 472 453 11 TOTAL 13 TOTAL ADA 11 (2 VAN) (2 VAN) 31 TOTAL 31 TOTAL ELEC. (1 ACCESSIBLE (1 ACCESSIBLE 0 VEHICLE 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE 1 AMBULATORY) 1 AMBULATORY) TOTAL 528 514 507 4.12 PARKING 4.00 PARKING 3.8B PARKING RATIO SPACES PER 1,000 SPACES PER 1,000 SPACES PER 1,000 GSF BUILDING GSF BUILDING GSF BUILDING AREA AREA AREA 128,429 GSF COMMERCIAL RETAIL BLDG. ® 4 PARKING SPACES PER 1,000 GSF = 514 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 2B BICYCLE 0 26 (2 LONG TERM BIKE GO PARKING SPOT6) OUTDOOR SEATING 40 SEATS PROVIDED 128,429 GSF COMMERCIAL RETAIL BLDG. O 1 BICYCLE SPACES PER 5,000 GSF =26 BICYCLE SPACES REQUIRED . 1 66.0 PROPOSED ORDER PICKUP ENTRY. . ' 5. t # ' • 15 PROPOSED DRIVE UP STORE ACCESS. QQQ Q wQQ �j TYP. s 21 20 -_I 1 ` i ! 16 PROPOSED GREEN SCREEN. �[ 13 2 6 ' g 8 -9 _ _,. L i 4 N 1 17 PROPOSED PLANTER (TYP). TYR 1••";•-;�-•-,_,' -- 1 t i II•^" •. 18 PROPOSED DRIVE -UP BEACON. I 3 _-_ _ T-- ���'•"' '""_^.(-"-' I i , ,.''�- r• i;..i 19 PROPOSED BIKE RACKS. I 4 •- ...... i 20 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF CURPERTINO STANDARD DETAIL t--'-- r..:-?.� I i E I 1-21. t-' --i II R/W PROPOSED SIDEWALK. (i ✓.::: ! ,;•,�,;,-;,; I �_., EI ( ; 22 BIKE REPAIR STATION. PROPOSED SPHERICAL BOLLARDS. PARCEL 3 I iI I I I 24 PROPOSED WASTE TRIO STATION AND CIGARETTE BUTT URN. 4 ._ _ 0.981± ACRES j I 1 I 25 TRUNCATED DOMES. �Q=_= TYP. ��� 20735 STEVENS CREEK BLVD it W I -.__s__ _ :_._ _._ r—?—• I :� [I i 26 PROPOSED BIKE LOCKER. PROPOSED ADA RAMP. W� 26 PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTER. I �a� ;, ,PAVERS T0, REMAIN � ( 3j t I ¢ i° j I 29 BIORETENTION AREA -' -'"" `- `" 1 `-•�� \ I It }I 30 PROPOSED CIGARETTE BUTT URN. s 19 (8) __. t 1 5 TYP ! ( t !I W% I� ` 31 PROPOSED BACKLESS BENCH WITH DIVIDERS. 36 2 I p p IE If I I I PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF CUPERTINO STANDARD DETAIL 1 / i;. I it t i + t -;i;�: ':-<. , If, ''!'" ,..{{. .. - •• ? ` r 21•jL,.dL.Jt€ if I i1 O PROPOSED TRASH COMPACTOR ENCLOSURE WITH ROOF PER CITY •• -••: �T• Y 1:•..�;.;;r ;•.:.32-:: --?•'� %1 \ 33 OF CUPER71NO MUNICIPAL CODE. e I ' � ' • � .y. �...� -� • - '_ ''' " - ' I I -- --1 t-�-----.--•---.._._.. _...._.. ...-I----� � 34 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL GENERATOR WITH ENCLOSURE. r. "'31 PROPOSED MECHANICAL YARD WITH ENCLOSURE •_'"_ ._26.0' , _... 6 TYP. --- R/W i - + 36 PROPOSED SCULPTURED BENCH, SEE ARTIST PLANS FOR DETAILS. BoULEVAKD - - - - - - - — ..— —... _ — (A PZ3BLIC ST�tEEf) _ — _ — _ — _ — — — — — , NORTH - - _ - -1 GENERAL NOTES _..__.____---.-..---••`!-'T.__._._--^--------._............_.__......_.. �. 1 PHOTOMETRIC STUDY WILL BE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE `.�^,•�„••.•� X- -- X-_-_• -_ ---.::c== ��••� -'"- I BUILDING PERMIT SUBMISSION IN COMPLIANCE WITH CMC 19.60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET _......::::_—_•- t =-=----- LIGHTING STANDARDS 0 20 40 BO _ . • TARGET® 100D NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOUS• MN 55403 Kimley*Horn 100 WEST SAN FER.111DO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. I Description 1103/16 Entitlement 5ubm=l l 323118 Entitlement Submittel2 620/18 EnBilement SubmiBal3 GO L J U m� Yo 0 WLO 6 Q 0 U Q z z W W h- W W U �v r O N Project Number T-0323 Prot: Version: I CaMg: D..Ign.d By J. Kirby Cbeaked By M.Johnson SITE PLAN C 1.0 STREET CENTERLINE t PROPERTY ELVEiSi EASEMENT LINE --:___ "`�- � -�----, _CIVIL LIMIT OF WORK LINE EXISTING POINT OFRIVE o CONNECTION TO CIN STORM ' I + _-____-_---_..>____ DMA BOUNDARY LINE °rr-•-•--•--- DRAIN SYSTEM TO REMAIN.- - •--�--• '-'�" I j ZT-250.51 FS - - _ - - _ - - - _ - - - FLOW LINE MATCH EX. _ - _ I + PROPOSED 6" STORM DRAIN LINE ! ,-_._.„,„_..�,_„_.•„.,_,_,_,.^,..,,,,,,, �,.,.......-'g.:�----- �, -EXISTING STORM DRAIN I EXISTING 12" STORM DRAIN LINE :. - - - , ...INLET TO REMAIN - - - - .�:,....:....- ,.:---= >:.. , R RIDGE LINE EXISTING POINT OF i ' \ . ' •' ,[244 SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION I III Il [I CONNECTION TO CITY STORM � I DRAIN SYSTEM TO REMAIN. j + / f (25 FFE) STORM DRAIN FLOW DIRECTION � � 1.30 � \ � I �► 251.28 FS __- __ IMATCH EX. %?;:'ri''�..' `�.�: "� ; y"' -' i a e . STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT DMA 3 EXISTING STORM DRAIN \ ' ` C II••: P ,�I ar,_ 251.43 FS .. , "? ' 3 -INLET TO REMAIN ! I�_ II '• - � i I CMATCH `3[ I jII1f1 EX. (TG249.09) / y�, •.. `f�1� - i STANDARD DUTY ASP HALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED RELOCATION OFO OVERFLOW INLET PROM DECORATIVE PAVERS BMP /3:=- i 251.73 FS_ i c cT s 4 -, 6 IMATCH EX. E I j LANDSCAPE ASTORMREA (249.52 FL EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET TO BE RELOCATED INLET TO REMAIN RAIN i (TG: 249.40) \ (TG. 245.90) BIORETENTION AREA t III 1 " ,i 5 1 � ,• �'_ ' / EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET i s !PROPOSED RELOCATION OFOs s f„ OVERFLOW INLET _ ♦ _ PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET. INLET TO BE PROPERTY LINE _ / MARKED WITH "NO DUMPING FLOWS TO BAY 1252.09 FS- E 342.50 TC MATCH IXEXISTING STORM DRAIN p A 4 _ / / ,�-34'g'g PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ( ) .. 3 I I 'DMA 2 INLET TO BE RELOCATED 251.30 FFE !' _ - '--' (TG 249.86) ik; i \ • -I € / / /(342.50 TC) i EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION (250.15 FL) PROPOSED RELOCATION OF O i y ` !. / ° / 342.00 FS l 1 OVERFLOW INLET t jP'• t BMP /J1 GRADING DRAINAGE NOTES I`II I F 251,26 FS w ..,c, e ,. 4, i ..� `-'--' / r... 252.54 FS MATCH EX. 6 I '�'" ;•1 ,TSJ I . 250.09 FSds 1 / E 1 F1 1 •I / / O CURB AND GUTTER MATCH EX. EXISTING STORM DRAIN r i MATCH EX EX.) s INLET TO BE RELOCATED l%' € .. / If 253.17 FS r- # (TG: 249.83) 1 ' i / I I25.71r i O VALLEY GUTTER I L E FS 251.30 DOOR 1 I I MATCH EX. 250 26 FS //: - ! I %� 1i cc.- ; I . / O 6" PVC STORM DRAIN PIPE :. y i 7 + Y / O4 20' WIDE CURB CUTS AT BASIN INLETS i � I 251.30 DOOR T Q;: i i ,/! I OVERFLOW INLET FOR 100 -YEAR STORM I sl = f253.42 FS 3.50 FS S 2 ! 251.30 DOOR BIORETENTION AREA �i 25-.1 !. t ��.,' I. 5.0% O7 MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVAMON f DMA 1 250.48 FS 250.80 FS I . ( GENERAL NOTES E 25276 FS i 1 T { 251.30 DOOR (251.30 FFE) 251.30 DOOR 251.30 DOOR ! 1 ` E MATCH EX.: f "� - ay=• ,._F ! 248.77 FS ` � i 1. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS ARE TO BE FITTED WITH FULL" TRASH ! z l'� l i, , CAPTURE DEVICES THAT MEET THE CALIFORNIA WATER BOARD'S 1'J. FULL CAPTURE- SYSTEM DEFINITION AND ARE CERTIFIED FOR i 1 1 f : •.: 253.58 FS ,.„ w" %aoc. _� f = „Yt ::` r.,.. :> �' �' x! t 245.94 FS / '�<"• P"" �) INSTALLATION BY THE STATE WATER BOARD EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. - 2. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS, PROPOSED AND EXISTING TO REMAIN, I ., , i .".. ', :, .^ : .:...... .... '+ - • m'-.. __,�.,��,,;.-: vim_ j(is MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED WITH "NO DUMPING FLOWS TO BAY". V 252.78 FS f ^- "` -'� z • ------ 1 251.04 FS H 250.92 FS 25018 FS 24951 FS j • MATCH IX. t E MATCH IX.iMATCH EX. MATCH EX.' i 247 92 FS€ 25 j:LL '•�"„�...-.S 1 4 250.76 i I o.42 Fs,; ! � _-f" .. _. I I�{�•I✓'. 246.23 FSI o MATCH X. 253.23 FS F :;: •. �b� f ! MATCH EX. E 2 -50.4 7' :FS 2a9 98 �.FS, cEXISTING=�°.._......_ c _ II(C i._,_,_i! �...r;',. L:• I� :.. _ � I ! !i STORM DRAIN # ( i I� _--- •t I ! INLET TO REMAIN :=c: -•ss (......�.-�----• ;? ii I !i I iI I _ I _(TG 248.86) •-_� s... Ih � I F . E.� ,rte ',,y� --_., �-_• , I , �.-_: „ ('• � ;j III , 250.70 FS�_:.� � •=C-�.-cs _ c:'�:-. -:xy�� ! I 1 I I I `�„ j J "-'., �....... ' `�'•� ��•~ -- -1� EXISTING STORM DRAIN u I: ...._....:> ._._\ __-- c- INLET TO REMAIN (I # _ (TG 248.29) it W 253.71 FS "MATCH EX. ' V..^ ......_._ -_� _ ---'' .._ 254.32 FS .; ; • � -- \ + :-:r __ .^ ��". a= MATCH EX. 252.74 FS - . € 25295 n nn I I t I`i 255.53 FS FS i + i I MATCH EX. I jt I II F ,y..� 4..0 S7 - u3' s€,,.u-.•..)• + �.IL.,�L '!`I �j 1 \ is :-•r MITT Hill I E 254.67 FS'/- - "' '" 253.35 FS 251.57FS-_ 251.14 FS -249.68 FS _ -•- __ ..__. ..MATCH EX. - - MATCH EX. - - - MATCH' IX.- � MATCH EX. - - - MATCH EX._ - - - I OF - - - ,- - - - _ EXISTING POINT CI M CONN CTION TO TY STORM - NORTH 5 EVENS GREEK. BOULEVARD RAIN, SYSTEM TO REMAIN. -------------- _--�•..�- GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET - - •- 0 20 40 80 _717 7i - STORMWATER TREATMENT SIZING SUMMARY EXISTING INLETS TO BE RELOCATED EXISTING INLETS TO REMAIN INLETS TOTAL PROPOSED INLETS TOTAL INLETS REQUIRED PROVIDED 5 5 TOTAL TOTAL TREATMENT (4% BIORETENTION TOTAL AREA IMPERVIOUS PERVIOUS OF IMPERVIOUS TREATMENT AREA AREA AREA) AREA EXISTING CONDITIONS OF IMPROVEMENT 43,700 SF 33,400 SF 10,300 SF -- AREA PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF 43,700 SF 32,000 SF 11,700 SF 1,280 SF 1,420 SF IMPROVEMENT AREA PROPOSED STORMWATER TREATMENT SUMMARY ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE TOTAL TOTAL PROVIDED TREATMENT TOTAL AREA IMPERVIOUS PERVIOUS AREA TREATMENT* TYPE AREA DMA 1 24,600 SF 3,000 SF 21,600. SF 550 SF BI(1) BMP #1)TION (BMP DMA 2 14,100 SF 1,400 SF 12,700 SF 435 SF TION BIORETEN2) (BMP #2) DMA 3 34,000 SF 3,650 SF 30,350 SF 435 SF BIORETENTION (BMP #3) TOTAL 72,700 SF 8,050 64,650 SF 1,420 SF -- eDMA'S 1-3 TREATMENT AREAS ARE LESS THAN 496 OF THEIR TRIBUTARY AREA, WE ARE PRUPUSING TO ONLY TREAT WHAT IS REUUIKtU FOR OUR SITE AND THE ADDITIONAL FLOW FROM DMA'S 1-3 WILL BE SENT TO AN OVERFLOW INLET WITHIN THE BIORETENTION AREA. SITE STORM DRAIN INLETS TOTAL EXISTING INLETS EXISTING INLETS TO BE RELOCATED EXISTING INLETS TO REMAIN INLETS TOTAL PROPOSED INLETS TOTAL INLETS g 3 5 5 10 0 TARGET® 100)NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 K�mlepMorn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET. SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No.1 Description 1103ti Entitlemanis Submm°I1 3R3NS ntill°ments SubmhmI2 6/20118 n58e-ts Subml8e13 FOG �& �O �5 GO W I> U W r Lo OU Lr) 0 LU 0) UU I- cn O QW zz_ Lu F- a LLI U)a.w U Lr) C) r 0 N Project Number T-0323 Preto: Version: Con)g: Desine8e g r J. Kirby Dbe=n PRELIMINARY WCP, GRADING DRAINAGE PLAN C2,0- l TARGET® 1080 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55003 2 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 3 PROJECT: Target PROJECT: Target G� 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd `■/ W UjO Z WQ U 0? UO _ Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino. CA 95014 O N I The Target at The Cupertino store, located at 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd., Cupertino, CA,� Prolo: I varamn: gonna: Consulting Arborist Amended Report checked By R. Kopff ARBORIST (1' J. Mi ......._._.__._ 0 is scheduled for improvements and requires tree removals. Ruben Green from Evergreen Arborists Consultants was asked to perform a site inspection and prepare an i f '"�° '-� 1. r� , - { _i T Prepared for: arborist report. In preparation of this report, Kimley-Horn provided a survey of 47 numbered trees that are shown on the initial Tree Disposition Plan TD1.1, attached. 1 tr . Matthew J. Morgan, PLA, ASLA Landscape Architecture Kimley-Horn surveyed the 47 trees located in the Target parking lot planters on February 17, 2018.77 The tree inventory provides the species, condition, trunk diameter, approximate canopy width and height, ands photo of each tree from the site. Each tree photo has The tree trees the 1-1.3 I downloaded an [I 401 B Street Suite 600 number that correspond to the numbered on plan. also aerial image of the and depict locations of the numbered trees. & 1F 11 ry T 2?,STI San Diego CA, 92101 Direct: 619.272.7192 property ,� Of the 47 trees, one tree was removed and only the stump remained. Many of the5..11tat(It trees had numbered tags nailed to the tree trunks which are referenced in is i1 't�k) PROJECT: Target galvanized my spreadsheet. I assign acondition rating to each tree baosed on the following: x1,1 �ji 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd Very, good A healthy vigourous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of ; Cupertino, CA 95014 disease; good structure and form typical of the species. A,''+r'� • d �k. Yvk+k 'moi 4zW Evergreen Prepared by: Arbodsts Consultants, Inc. Good Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, thinning of crown, poor leaf color, minor trunk damage; moderate structural defects 1 )--r;j -;I,1„ m 5143 Poston Drive that might be mingaied with regualr care. ° San Jose, CA 95136" 650.644.6115 Fair Tree in decline, epicarmic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large 1 branches: significant structural defects that cannot be abated. If t May 8, 2018 Poor Tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and/or trunk; most of foliage from epicormlcs; extensive structural defects that cannot besr abated. Dead Tree must be removed. .� EvergreeN ' - The survey shows one dead alder (tree #1), which should be removed to prevent potential damage To persons or property. One evergreen pear (tree # 18) is in poor I* in11'hl1ry G condition and one maple (tree #31) is in fair condition; both should be removed. The 'hill] l.' ' ) a is 1r tirrl;jili'LI_r1 It dY _„s r t•' remaining trees are in good condition. „ltl Tree Disposition Plan 1-1.3 4 5 6 PROJECT: Target PROJECT: Target PROJECT: Target 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Tree # on site -Helght- -Canopy Width- Aluminum Tree It onsite -Height -Canopy Width- Aluminurn:. ., e"a .:. .. • "F:.: �. .,.:: K. ..s; _. ,..,. pfin Species -Common Name Conditionfeet feet -DBH-inches tree tag# . `plan Species -Common Name Condition feet feet -DBH-inches treetagt. 20x20 12 33 45 Silk floss Good 22 20x20 22 NA ............... Good..._..:._ ..20............. 20x20 ....,,. 12 ........................--........i ,.....46 Jacaranda Good 20 30x30 ., 20 NA ................. ............ ....Good ....6 ,.... 3 Jaramnda .. ......... Good 27 ....... 28x30 ... ;, 14 61 .... ....:. .. 47 -: Flowering Che rfY10x10 6 NA ............................... ..__......... ... " ...... ... ....... ......... ... ,..� w Mapl Good 10 10x10 4/5/4/4 81 ....... ...... _ -�s -_ -: ...._...4 .._. 5 Bradford pear Good 25 20x24 11 79 6 Bradford pear Good 25 3280 13 78 0 s- 7 Bradford pear Good 19 20x16 6 77 8 Bradford pear Good 75 24226 13 76 )� . ...._9 Bradford. pear Good 16 34x16 7 fib Q�15.J�,x p. C 10 .Bradford ear Good 13 10x12 5 69 P ll Bradfordpear GoodS6 I6z14 10 70 1 •'.�. 12 Bradfordpear God 1916214 9 71 "7 ' ]3 Evergreen pear Good _ 16 ._. 14x16 5143 5 141 Y"4 v .14 Evergreen per Good 17_, 10x12 15 Bradford pear Good ZO 10x12 4 140 16 'Bradford Good 13 6x4 2 139 { 1 17 Bradford pear Good 21 4x16 4 137 ms,,Q; rid ;^ - 18 Evergreen pear Poor 14 18x14 4 1 136 a» ` - 219 Evergreen pear Good 22 18222 8 135 .... .. ....; �,• '''� -:.", 20 Evergreen pear Good 21 12216 6 134 .... .. 21 .Evergreen pear Good 2116x16 7 - 133 .: - ., 22 Evergreen per God 16 17x14 6 132 ._.... 23 Evergreen pear Good 14 24x12 4 131 •x .- `•�•_ -;'� - ' 24 Evergreen pear Good 13 20x12 4 130 E q, •"- s°+ 25 Evergreen pear Goud 15 24x12 5 129 26 Maple Good 7 1200 4/3/4/4/3 80 Ingim;-. 27 Crape myrtle Good SO 6x8 6 128 .i �B•"`'v "'•.. , .,.': .` ".."„ .•. 28 Crapemyrtle Good.... 14 12x12 6 127 - Maple ........ .. .... ....Good... 11 ..... 12216 :(, Good 10 24216 - 4/3/4............. 96 31 :Maple Falr : 6 - 10x72 ..... .7i ....32 .:Maple............ Good '.: S : 3 8x10 _. 212/3/3........... 95... Aerial image of the roe showing the locations of The frees. property rty .. _.__.. .Maple......... .. Good : 6 . 222 1 NA.......i . :,.......34 :.Maple..... ... .. Good 6 ........ 12x10 :....... i5......_ Crape myrtle ......................... V...._Good............................ 36 Crepe myrtle _............. Good 14 10x8 _. 4 125 ' 37 Crape myrtle .„_ Good 17 16x16 5 124 38 Crape myrtle Good 16 18x O 5 123 39 Stumponly NA Crape myrtle ......... Good. 12 16x14 ......; . ......._40 .... 41 Crapemyrtle... ...... Good 31 -', 24x22 42 .Crapemyrtle........... Good 12 -.,. ,,.._ 12x16 . 4/2/3/3_.._,.._ NA 43 Crape myrtle , , Good 11, 8x12 3/3/3 NA I .. 44 Crapemyrtle Good - 11 8x14 3/3/3_ NA l TARGET® 1080 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55003 Kimley» Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description G� L J I� U m r `■/ W UjO Z WQ U 0? UO ZZ W W ~ Q W WU to O N I Projod N—b., T-0323 Prolo: I varamn: gonna: Drown By M. Morgan checked By R. Kopff ARBORIST REPORT Ll 0 TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOUS, MN 55403 Kimlepo Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE — SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description GIO W Um' `1 � W rn z UU WZZ W W H WW � � U Lr)0 C, 0 N • Proud Number T-0323 Pmt': Vemlon: ConOg: D— By M. Morgan Cbe'Hed By R. Kopff ARBORIST REPORT lH 0 IE PROJECT: Target 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd Cupertino. CA 95014 PROJECT: Target 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd Cuaerfino, CA 95014 EN 13 PROJECT: Target 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd Cupertino, CA 95014 Qualitieations Ruben Green, president of Evergreen Arborists Consultants, Inc. has more than 33 years of experience in the landscape industry. His background includes hands-on experience In tree care, landscape maintenance, construction, and irrigation management. He has a Master's degree in plant science from Caltfomta State Polytechnic University, Pomona. He has provided detailed investigations, independent analysis and expert witness testimony since 2003. He is a member of the American Society of Consulting Arborists (RSCA), a certified arborist and a certified tree risk assessor (IRAQ) with the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), licensed pesticide applicator (QAL) with the state of California, and a (C-27) licensed California contractor. Assumptions and Limitations My field methods were evaluated with a 100 percent ground visual survey. No crimbing, excavating, coring, boring, or drilling was performed. Trees that require additional inspection for risk and hazard evaluation will be billed under a separate proposal. Evergreen Arbarists Consultants, Inc„ and/or Ruben M. Green, or its employees, or related companies, makes no guaranties, express or implied to the health, risk, hazard, condition, potential for failure or future condition of the trees. Site inspections are limited to the date and time inspections occur. All inspections are visual ground inspections and are not considered as a thorough risk inspection. No root collar excavation was performed. Additional inspections) require a separate agreement between both parties in writing. Evergreen Arborists Consultants, Inc., and/or Ruben M. Green, or its employees shall not be liable to client/owner or any other party(s) for loss of property, loss of life, loss of use, loss of profits or income(s), special damages, incidental damages, consequential damages, or damages arising from the failure of inspection(s) or weather conditions. The client shall hold this arborist harmless against any and all claims for injuries to persons or property on the premises. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near a tree is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risks is to eliminate all trees. e 1 i PLANT SCHEDULE r � z ``5� TREES CODE Qa BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME QQU XR 43 EXISTING TREE/TO BE REPLACED - ALV ��? DRIVE __-'}'--'-'-y-- - -� - - EXISTING TREE ICONFLICT WITH (APUBLICSTREETI _ _ "'t.•A,' PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL, CIVIL ® `�`-� - OR PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS, OR DETERMINED TO BE _-------- IN -DECLINE OR DEAD. REFER TO - -- - '- - "��- �' '""-' '"•'- _ TREE MITIGATION TABLE FOR MORE _ , U ••- -�- ---i- INFORMATION. SEE PLANTING PLAN t .. ., s FOR LOCATION OF -. 'i. ::`a CORRESPONDING REPLACEMENT TREES 9 THROUGH 12 WERE ! : ° ° ° 'ORIGINALLY TAGGED FOR a I �' TREE. i REMOVAL, BUT SHALL ° / II REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE. - V i - C it 11 1-C. 2 1 f I a Ii IT O I. O 7 r° .i t z f a a t a 4 t t O 0 01 � 1I n, f i... -�9QQ W QQ j ( I I t y y "' _:•'- . � !' \ ! � .��. � .3 .3 R I ♦ �r:+'+eP """^++.•wyv :f.: � i (' I„�.•/•'� I .; � � ;;..€��' `'• r .._�.. a•� 45 o v I � E i � i `. .i• � Ij 11 ' li T t •. t.� , tea_:.=•=.� is -•I a o a =^� i I I Ji 'I - _.� _. ... ...._.._._.__. •o t i ( is Pa O - --•O °WO--• a ... _. 0 4;0 ...-o� .°�,t- --.-°�• c:�?:r--' ° 4 ° _ "c 1 iI a i _ a .a a • P. j 1 pUi o .",. E a a O m .I it It':1.+.^^t'.." I .� n 4 TREE DISPOSITION TABLE Kidepo horn too WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN TREE NUMBER SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME DBH OVERALL HEIGHT/SPREAD/STH 1 O ° c Mite Alder 12" 201/20' E ° 0 O \5 G\ .i t z f a a t a 4 t t O 0 01 � 1I n, f i... -�9QQ W QQ j ( I I t y y "' _:•'- . � !' \ ! � .��. � .3 .3 R I ♦ �r:+'+eP """^++.•wyv :f.: � i (' I„�.•/•'� I .; � � ;;..€��' `'• r .._�.. a•� 45 o v I � E i � i `. .i• � Ij 11 ' li T t •. t.� , tea_:.=•=.� is -•I a o a =^� i I I Ji 'I - _.� _. ... ...._.._._.__. •o t i ( is Pa O - --•O °WO--• a ... _. 0 4;0 ...-o� .°�,t- --.-°�• c:�?:r--' ° 4 ° _ "c 1 iI a i _ a .a a • P. j 1 pUi o .",. E a a O m .I it It':1.+.^^t'.." I .� n 4 TREE DISPOSITION TABLE Kidepo horn too WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN TREE NUMBER SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME DBH OVERALL HEIGHT/SPREAD/STH REMARKSIICONDfT10N 1 Anus rhombifolia Mite Alder 12" 201/20' Removeandreplace-Dead 0 O \5 G\ W ♦ i� U J `/ m W 2,O � 2, Ix 00 Z Z a W LU p EL U Lf) C) r O N • Remove and replace - In canflictwith 2 Ceibaspeclosa Floss Silk Tree 12" 20'/20' proposed pedraimprovements _Lh Remove antl plac ffBict with 3 Jacaranda mimosifolie Jacaranda 14" 27'/28' proposed civil. improvements 4"ea. Remove and replace - In conflictwith 4 Acerpalmatum Japanese Maple Trunk 10'110' vents liproposed civil Improme Remove and replace - In conflictwim 5 Pym. calladane Flowering Pear 11" 25'/20' proposed GNI improvements Removeand replace - In wnflicl with 6 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 13" 25'/30' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 7 Pyrus calleriana .Flowering Pear 6" 19'/16' proposed ctN1 improvements Rem.w.nd replace - h conlik t with 8 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 13" 25'/24' proposed civil improvements Tree to remain, protect in place - Curb 9 Pyrus calledana Flowering Pear 7" 16'/14' shall be reconstructed to save tree Tree to remain, protect In place -Curb 10 Pyrus calleriane Flowering Pear 5" 131/1V shall be reconstructed to save tree Tree to remain, protect in place -Curb 11 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 10" 16'114' shall be reconstructed to save tree Tree to remain, protectIn place - Cuto 12 Pyrus callenena Flowering Pear 9" 19'/14' shall be reconstructed to save tree Remove and replace - In con8ictwith 13 Pyres kawakamli Evergreen Pear 5" 19'/14' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflictwith 14 Pa+.kawakam li Evergreen Poor 5" 17'110' proposed civil lm prove. encs Remove and replace - In cenfliclwith 15 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 4" 20'/10' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflictwith 16 Pyrus calledana Flowering Pear 2" 13'/4' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflictwith 17 Pyrus calledene . Flowedng Pear 4" 17/6 proposed civil improvements Remove and replace -Poor health and in 18 Pyrus kawakemii Evergreen Pear 4" 21'/14' conflict with proposed civil improvements Remove antl replace - In conflict with 19 Pyrus kawakemii Evergreen Pear 8" 22'/18' proposed ciNlimprovemena Remove and replace -In conflict with 20 Pyrus kawakam it Evergreen Pear 6" 21'/12' proposed civil Improvements Remove and replace -h cenflictwih 21 Pyrus kawakemii Evergreen Pear 7" 21'/16' propose dcivilimprovements Remove antl replace - In cenflictwith 22 Pyrus kawakam li Evergreen Pear 8" 161/12' proposed civil Improvements Remove and replace - In conflictwith 23 Pyrus kawakemii Evergreen Pear 6" 14'112' propos ed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflictwith 24 Pyrus kawakamli Evergreen Pear 4" 13'/12' proposed civil improvements Remove antl replace - In conflidwith 25 Pyrus kawakemii Evergreen Pear 5" 15'/12' proposed civil improvements 4"ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 26 Acerpalmahim Japanese Maple Trunk 7'/10' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In cenflictwith 27 Lagerstroemia indicts Crepe Myrtle 6" 10'/6 proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 28 Lagerstroemia indica Crepe Myrtle 6" 14'112' propos ad civil improvements 3"ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 29 Acerpalmatum Japanese Maple Trunk 11'/12' proposed civil improvements 4"ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 30 Acerpalmatum Japanese Maple Trunk 10'/16' proposed civil improvements S" ea. Remove and replace - Fair health and in 31 AcerpalmahIm Japanese Maple Trunk 6'/10' conflictwith proposed civil improvements 2"ea. Remove and replace - In conflictwith 32 Acerpalmatum Japanese Maple Trunk 5'18' proposed civil Improvements Remove and replace - In conflictwith 33 A-petmatum Japanese Maple 1" 6'/2' proposed civil improvements 3" ca. Remove and replace - In conflict with 34 AcerpalmaWm Japanese Maple Trunk 17'/16' proposed civil improvements 3" ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 35 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Trunk 14'112' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace -In conflictwith 36 Lagerstroemia indica Crepe Mydle 4" 14'/8' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace -In conflictwih 37 Lagerstroemia indicts Crape Myrtle: 5" 17'/16' proposed cl i mprovements Remove and replace - In conflictwith 38 Lagerstroemia indica Crepe Myrtle 5" 16'/18' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In'conflictwith 39 Lagerstroemia indice Crape Myrtle - STUMP Na n/a proposedcivilimprovemen5 3"ea. Rem.. Wd-elece-hPconflictwith 40 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Trunk 12'/14' propos ed civil improvements 3" ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 41 Lagerstroemia indica Crape "a Trunk 11'122' proposedcivil improvements 3"ea. Remove and replace - In conflictwith 42 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Trunk 12'/12' proposed civil improvements 3"ea. Remove and replace -In cenflictwith 43 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle. Trunk 11'/8' proposed civil improvements 37ea. Remove and replace -In conflictwith 44 Lagerstroemia indica Crape le Myrt Trunk 11'/8' pmposedciNl Improvements Removeantlreplace-Inconflid ith 45 Ceiba speciosa Floss Silk Tree 22" 20'120' proposed ped improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 46 Jacaranda mimosifolla Jacaranda 20" 30'130'propesedpedimprovements Remove and replace -h cengictwith 47 Prunus spp. IFlowering Cherry 6" 101/10' liproposed ped improvements I WL I •�� — - —e — — — _ _ _ JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT — — —STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD _ — — ALL TREES NOTED ON THIS PLAN ARE TO BE REMOVED DUE TO POOR HEALTH AND/OR CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED NORTH (A PUBLIC STREET)-_- IMPROVEMENTS. ALL TREES PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL WILL BE REPLACED ON A 1:1 BASIS. TREES THAT ARE DEEMED INAPPROPRIATE FOR SHALL O REPLACEMENT IN-KIND, DUE TO CLIMATIC CONDITIONS OR WATER CONSERVATION PURPOSES REPLACED WITH AN ADAPTIVE, DROUGHT -TOLERANT SPECIES OF SIMILAR MATURE HEIGHT AND SPREAD, TO X '--- c3 ->{•y --- r --- =�J "'- - - `---`- y - PROMOTE HEALTHIER AND ENDURING URBAN CANOPY AT THIS SITE. - - GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 80 i E E TARGET. 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55403 Kidepo horn too WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Dale No. Description 0 O \5 G\ W ♦ i� U J `/ m W 2,O � 2, Ix 00 Z Z a W LU p EL U Lf) C) r O N • Prated Number T-0323 Prow: Version: Conrg: Drown By M. Morgan Checked By R. Kopff TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN L1,3_ ONLY REMOVE REQUIRED FO'. ROTATE CURB AWAY FROM TREE PLAN VIEW TREE DEMOLITION SEQUENCE: 1. PERFORM ANY ROOT PRUNING. 2. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING 3. CAREFULLY REMOVE SIDEWALK AND BASE MATERIAL, COORDINATE ALL DEMOLITION OPERATIONS AROUND PROTECTED TREES WITH ENGINEER AND PROJECT ARBORIST. NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES, COORDINATE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 2. ALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE AND APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES. S 3. OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO APPROVE ANY CANOPY THINNING AND/OR CANOPY RAISING PRUNING TO ALLOW FOR DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. AREA TREE PROTECTION AREA TREE PROTECTION FENCE, REF. DETAIL ON THIS SHEET ROOT PRUNING TRENCH (TYP) REF. TREE PROTECTION PLANS AND TREE PLANT SPECIFICATIONS "ECTED TREE ROOTS CURB AND SIDEWALK DEMOLITION W/ LANDSCAPE PROTECTION FENCE SEE DET. 1 THIS SHEET FOR TYPE ROOTPRUNE SEE SECTION �'- :I az 0 .'( 17YP. �V j SEE PLAN �w w w YP. n PLAN -�{- PROTECTION ROOT PRUNE I I/ II /- FENCE SEE PLAN TRENCH CUT SEE PLAN ROOTS -V ,'•12 ,/i Y z io CLEAN CUT ALL ROOTS w/ LOPERS OR CHAINSAW ON SIDE NEAR TREE Id 6" M SECTION ROOT PRUNING SECTIUN NTS NTS TREE PROTECTION NOTES TREE PROTECTION FENCE - CHAIN LINK TREE PF WOOD CHIP MULCH (6" DEPTH) RADIUS=1 FOOT PER INCH OF TRUCK DIAMETER WOOD CHIP MULCH AREA (4"•6" DEPTH) TREE PROTECTION FENCE (MODIFIED) - CHAIN to LINK OR ORANGE SNOW FLAKE MESH TREE PROTECTION FENCE AT FOR . TREE) DRIPLINE 1. THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE (TPZ) IS THE AREA AROUND A TREE OR GROUP OF TREES IN WHICH NO GRADING, EXCAVATION, STAGING, STORING OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS TO OCCUR. 2. ANY TREE OR GROUP OF TREES IDENTIFIED AS 'PROTECT IN PLACE" SHALL HAVE A TPZ ESTABLISHED AROUND THE INDIVIDUAL TREE OR GROUP OF TREES. 3. FOR THIS PROJECT THE TPZ SHALL BE DETERMINED BY ESTABLISHING AN AREA AROUND THE BASE OF THE TREE THAT IS EQUAL TO 2/3 THE AREA OF THE DRIPLINE. THE DRIPLINE IS THE AREA DEFINED BY THE OUTERMOST CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE TREE CANOPY WHERE WATER DRIPS FROM AND ONTO THE GROUND. 4. PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE USED TO ESTABLISH A TPZ AROUND EACH TREE OR GROUP OF TREES PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION, CLEARING AND GRADING. A SIGN WARNING PEOPLE TO STAY OUT OF THE TPZ SHALL BE AFFIXED ONTO THE FENCING. 5. ESTABLISH THE TPZ UTILIZING TREE PROTECTION FENCING (SEE DETAIL ON SHEET TD -1). 6. THE FENCE SHALL ENCLOSE THE TREE OR GROUP OF TREES AND REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED OR PRIOR TO NEW LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION WORK IS TO COMMENCE IN THESE AREAS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION ADJACENT TO THE TPZ BY: . LIMITING TRAFFIC AND STORAGE AREAS PROTECTING SOIL SURFACE WITH DEEP MULCH MINIMIZING COMPACTION ON NON -LOAD BEARING AREAS PROVIDING EXTRA REINFORCEMENT IN PAVING MATERIALS AVOIDING USE OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT AROUND TREES. 8. MINIMIZE EXCAVATION ADJACENT TO THE TPZ: MAINTAIN NATURAL GRADE AROUND THE TREE ROUTE UTILITIES AROUND TREES, BORE OR TUNNEL UTILITIES UNDER TREES, AND COMBINE UTILITIES IN ONE TRENCH, WHERE POSSIBLE. SITE PREPARATION NOTES 1. ALL TREES NOT SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND IDENTIFY TREES WHICH ARE TO BE PROTECTED AS WELL AS THOSE WHICH ARE TO BE REMOVED. DEMOLITION SHALL NOT COMMENCE WITHOUT A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF EXISTING CONDITIONS TO BE PRESERVED. 3. TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED BY THE INSTALLATION OF FENCING AT THE DRIPLINE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. FENCING SHALL BE SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FROM COMPACTING SOIL AT THE ROOT ZONE AND DAMAGING TRUNKS AND BRANCHES. 4. IF, IN ORDER TO PERFORM EXCAVATION WORK, IT BECOMES NECESSARY TO CUT ROOTS OF PLANTS TO BE SAVED, SUCH ROOTS SHOULD BE CUT NEATLY, COVERED WITH BURLAP AND KEPT MOIST UNTIL ROOTS ARE BACK FILLED WITHIN 24 HOURS. 5. TREE REMOVAL SHALL INCLUDE THE FILLING, CUTTING, GRUBBING OUT OF ENTIRE ROOTBALLS AND SATISFACTORY -OFFSITE DISPOSAL OF ALL TREES, SHRUBS, STUMPS, VEGETATIVE AND EXTRANEOUS DEBRIS PRODUCED BY THE REMOVAL OPERATIONS. 6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF WORK DUE TO HIS CONTRACT OPERATIONS. 7. ALL REFUSE, DEBRIS, UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE LEGALLY DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE BY CONTRACTOR.: 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES IN THE SITE SURVEY TO THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK -*— 10 MAX � . Kimley»)Cliorn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, OA 95113 KEYPLAN 'AS NEEDED TO DRIPLINE(VARIES) PROVIDE NECESSARY FENCE LOCATION WORK SPACE. IF LESS THAN 5', THEN ADD (LIMITS OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE) BOARDS STRAPPED TO RADIUS=1 FOOT PER INCH TRUNK OF TRUCK DIAMETER B TREE PROTECTION FENCING N>s 1. THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE (TPZ) IS THE AREA AROUND A TREE OR GROUP OF TREES IN WHICH NO GRADING, EXCAVATION, STAGING, STORING OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS TO OCCUR. 2. ANY TREE OR GROUP OF TREES IDENTIFIED AS 'PROTECT IN PLACE" SHALL HAVE A TPZ ESTABLISHED AROUND THE INDIVIDUAL TREE OR GROUP OF TREES. 3. FOR THIS PROJECT THE TPZ SHALL BE DETERMINED BY ESTABLISHING AN AREA AROUND THE BASE OF THE TREE THAT IS EQUAL TO 2/3 THE AREA OF THE DRIPLINE. THE DRIPLINE IS THE AREA DEFINED BY THE OUTERMOST CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE TREE CANOPY WHERE WATER DRIPS FROM AND ONTO THE GROUND. 4. PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE USED TO ESTABLISH A TPZ AROUND EACH TREE OR GROUP OF TREES PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION, CLEARING AND GRADING. A SIGN WARNING PEOPLE TO STAY OUT OF THE TPZ SHALL BE AFFIXED ONTO THE FENCING. 5. ESTABLISH THE TPZ UTILIZING TREE PROTECTION FENCING (SEE DETAIL ON SHEET TD -1). 6. THE FENCE SHALL ENCLOSE THE TREE OR GROUP OF TREES AND REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED OR PRIOR TO NEW LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION WORK IS TO COMMENCE IN THESE AREAS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION ADJACENT TO THE TPZ BY: . LIMITING TRAFFIC AND STORAGE AREAS PROTECTING SOIL SURFACE WITH DEEP MULCH MINIMIZING COMPACTION ON NON -LOAD BEARING AREAS PROVIDING EXTRA REINFORCEMENT IN PAVING MATERIALS AVOIDING USE OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT AROUND TREES. 8. MINIMIZE EXCAVATION ADJACENT TO THE TPZ: MAINTAIN NATURAL GRADE AROUND THE TREE ROUTE UTILITIES AROUND TREES, BORE OR TUNNEL UTILITIES UNDER TREES, AND COMBINE UTILITIES IN ONE TRENCH, WHERE POSSIBLE. SITE PREPARATION NOTES 1. ALL TREES NOT SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND IDENTIFY TREES WHICH ARE TO BE PROTECTED AS WELL AS THOSE WHICH ARE TO BE REMOVED. DEMOLITION SHALL NOT COMMENCE WITHOUT A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF EXISTING CONDITIONS TO BE PRESERVED. 3. TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED BY THE INSTALLATION OF FENCING AT THE DRIPLINE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. FENCING SHALL BE SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FROM COMPACTING SOIL AT THE ROOT ZONE AND DAMAGING TRUNKS AND BRANCHES. 4. IF, IN ORDER TO PERFORM EXCAVATION WORK, IT BECOMES NECESSARY TO CUT ROOTS OF PLANTS TO BE SAVED, SUCH ROOTS SHOULD BE CUT NEATLY, COVERED WITH BURLAP AND KEPT MOIST UNTIL ROOTS ARE BACK FILLED WITHIN 24 HOURS. 5. TREE REMOVAL SHALL INCLUDE THE FILLING, CUTTING, GRUBBING OUT OF ENTIRE ROOTBALLS AND SATISFACTORY -OFFSITE DISPOSAL OF ALL TREES, SHRUBS, STUMPS, VEGETATIVE AND EXTRANEOUS DEBRIS PRODUCED BY THE REMOVAL OPERATIONS. 6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF WORK DUE TO HIS CONTRACT OPERATIONS. 7. ALL REFUSE, DEBRIS, UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE LEGALLY DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE BY CONTRACTOR.: 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES IN THE SITE SURVEY TO THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK TARGET® 1000 MCOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55403 Kimley»)Cliorn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, OA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No.1 Description �6\ GO W J U m� `1 O W Lo Lu O z w Q UV I-- U) O � ZZ LLI W ~ Q aU) wU CL Lo r O N Project Number T-0323 Prato: Version: Oonilg: D. -By M. Morgan Checked By R. Kopff TREE MANAGEMENT NOTES & DETAILS LlA_ ! ! i � � - /fr �¢�'v - _�___��__.���•��'� --^�._ li ar Ip;�'-d�`�• � i_----------� -I ;•/I 'I � � L I G w` w _- v ?.-.--.-__•_= v Al CONCEPTUAL PLANTING SCHEDULE KEY NOTES ALVES ES DRI V E - - - - - - - TREES QUANT. CONT. WUCOLS O (APUBllCSTREETI _ , EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. TARGET. 60 -@. �yT, g /�.y EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN -PROTECT IN PLACE 41I NICO Mir NEAPOLV MALL - - N 55403 23 24 BOX M MONUMENT SIGN WITH UPDATED .................. ._._.. ..�--------------- - -..........•""'^"'•" CE CIS OCCIDENTALS I WESTERN REDBUD, OR O GRAPHICS. t• �- I JJ F •. ," --' "-'--"'-"- '""� `"'"`"'_ "" ^•'"•^ -- -�-(' ---`r1 LAGERSTROEMIA INDICAX FAURIEI'ACOMA'I j '-- _ O PROPOSED REMOVABLE BOLLARDS. I -.: f t :i T— i! 7 :: .. ., ii !'I,.-. __________... ... ...___... ......___._............. ...._._____._____________-__ _. O- MAGNOLIA GEM SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA. OR VITEX TRIFOLIA'PURPUREA'(ARABIAN LILAC O6 PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS. ' Uorn d i. i- TYP. MEDIUM ACCENT TREE SUCH AS: 9 24ROX LIM Kimiep I I I c I PYRUSCALLERYANA'AUTUMNBLAZE? lAUTUMN BLAZE PEAR 5 36" Box UM O PROPOSED STORE ENTRANCE. - - =j TYP, BROAD CANOPY SHA I JACARETREE SLID DA,OAS: 18 24•eox M PROPOSED LANDSCAPED ENTRANCE PLAZA 100 WEST SAN ITE 250 DO STREET, JACARANDAMIMM SA IN STT MWAT OR O SSE. CA 6 i 95113 _., ./I PLATANUS RACEMOSA IN STORMWATERTREATMENTAREAS SAN O PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO PUBLIC O — -- CONCRETE. O I SHRUBS AND GROUNOCOVERS RIGHT-OF-WAY.DECREIIVE ) \ .__..._ i SHALL PROPOSED SHRUBS AND WING: DCOVERS 16 PROPOSED GREEN SCREEN. O "" '°"''-`j a SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: WUCOLS SIZE SPACING ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORAI MANZANITA L 1GAL 36'O.C, 17 PROPOSED PLANTER (TYP). s o ` I I •Y r s_ i OREGON GRAPE HOLLY MPACTA'I L 1GAL 3E o.c. PROPOSED BIKE RACKS. BOUTELOUA GRACILIS !BLUE GRAMMA L 1GAL 31YO.C. O PROPOSED SIDEWALK 19 <:' 4 - i 1 "O-__....� LI CARPINTERIACALIFORNICA - L 5GAL 46"O.C. 21 22 BIKE REPAIR STATION. KEYPLAN `` - ✓ _ _-' CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM/DWARF CAPE RUSH L 5GAL 36'O.C. O j I 4 Q .Q- _ _, DIANELLA REVOLUTA'LITLE REV'/ LITTLE REV FLAX LILY L 1GAL ITO.C. 23 PROPOSED SPHERICAL BOLLARDS. Date No. Description or 29 11 DYMONDIA MARGAREfAE/SILVER CARPET L 4'POT 6'O.C. l P .j{. 24 PROPOSED. WASTE TRIO STATION AND fl,' y i I; � HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENSI BLUE OAT GRASS L 5GAL 24'O.C. - CIGARETTE BUTT URN. !! •'' i�''' i'4 `1y "'' �+ '-'-'- H DIETES GRANDIFLORAI WILD IRIS L 5GlLL 24'O.0 IORETENTON AREA ,o c ;� ?.i';„�� • UPPIA NODIFLORA f KURAPIA L 4* POT 6"o.C. BUTT URN : Q I v 0PROPOSED CIGARETTE B `. ,C%' LOMANDRA LONGIFLIA'BREEZE'lDWARF MAT RUSH L 1GAL 3P O.C. Lly' I o 0 o c i �'`b O— _ _ MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARISI MUHLY GRASS L 5GAL 36D.C. 37 5' WIDTH CONCRETE PAD FOR ACCESS AT ART -- WALL TREE SWING I c M c 8 MYRTUS COMMUNIS'COMPACTA'/DWARF MYRTLE L 7 GAL 24'O.C. 29 32 PHORMIUM TENAX' RAINBOW MAIDEN'! L 5GAL 36'O.C. LOW 2" TO 6” HEIGHT MAXIMUM "f RAINBOW MAIDEN NEW ZEALAND FLAX GROUNDCOVER PLANTINGS AS EXTENSION OF `I °• SEE ENLARGEMENT A I 7 3 ' ART WALL FEATURE € f I SHEET L2.2 w C,•' - / ROSA'MEIZORLAND'/WHITE DRIFT ROSE M 1GAL 3D-O.C. ° ' 33 CUSTOM SCULPTURAL ART BENCH ! I 33 RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA'MOUND SAN SRUNO'/ L 5GAL 30"O.C. MOUND SAN BRUNO COFFEE BERRY WESTRINGIAFRUTICOSA 'LOW HORIZON'/ L 5GAL 36.O.C. LOW HORIZON COAST ROSEMARY i q 17 ;� ;c STORMWATER TREATMENT WUCOLS III 24 $ , �Jj„�Q '•L �, J j ,•rr „' TYP. PROPOSED STORMWATER TREATMENT i i P T OF FOLLOWING: I a .,. •. ,q ,,, ,,,, PLANTI SHALL CONSIST E 32 g i --4�,'s•'a- ),%� � t,7,f„t,i, CAREX TUMULICOLA/BERKELEY SEDGE L 1GAL 1YO.C. .1 qw 6 '��� d ,%' - ""� r +r JUNCUS PATENS/CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH L 7GAL 24'O.C. R MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS/DEER GRASS L 5GAL 38'O.C. /i I VINES wucOLS TYP. PROPOSED VINES FOR GREENSCREEN TREWS SYSTEM SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: Ll I g PQQ (r QQ (m QQ PARTHENOCISSUS TRICUSPIDATA'VEITCHII'/BOSTON IVY M 15 GAL 46'D.C. Ii -• - I --------------------- !� l �!i'•�..,TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES/STAR JASMINE M 15 GAL 46.O.C. I v /~ � q , ......-. i t jJ ! ! 4..: ^'I—a' - .......... __.2 :..Q........'......... I� 'r... ! ' `--..._ =_-, ! � ; .I, ( I �^ r -c mac.”.—; � I••. ` u i o _: ._; - - �I � I � ��'� v � 0 1 ,� v i Ca'• o--� .i; v��:_� !! t - I I i 0... ....0 sC _ Ilii ,• ,� �_:� �_____ __._- c I I I r..... II E ., � � •c -tel - .....I r - u Vii` SEE .ENLARGEMENT B, :.. I; -..... I .......—.:-.I -� SHEET L2.2 d......... I a j I I _ lz 24 I 17 2 - 33 I ! _ - - --STEVENS CREEK -BOULEVARD __. _... -.-. .._ (A PUBLIC --- --- - ---.._............_ .....................Y.'._.. _.._-_-_ -_� U _ i ....... ._. -. - ...... ___ ...... _. .. ...... ....... i f CODE COMPLIANCE REQUIRED PROVIDED TOTAL AREA OF PARKING LOT PER MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE SERVED BY PROPOSED MINIMUM INTERIOR LANDSCAPING 19.124.040: PARKING FACILITIES OVER 30,000 SF MUST PROVIDE 10% IMPROVEMENTS: 69,000 SF 69,000 X .10 a 6,900 LANDSCAPE AREA LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED: 5,90D SF PER MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE WHERE CIVIL IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRE PARKING LOT TREE CANOPY COVER/SPACING 79.124.040:.. ONE TREE PER FIVE PARKING STALLS FOR EVERY TEN ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING CONDITIONS, ONE TREE PER FIVE SPACES.IN A ROW STALLS HAS BEEN PROVIDED PER MUNICIPAL CODE.TABLE ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTER STRIPS LANDSCAPE PLANTER STRIPS 4 T LEAST THREE 19.124.040, A E WIDE BY WITHIN THE PARKING LOT MEET THE LENGTH OF THE PARKING STALL MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENTS PER MUNICIPAL .CODE TABLE ALL PROPOSED TREES ARE OFFSET PLACEMENT OF TREES 19.124.040: TREES SHALL BE OFFSET TO PREVENT CONFLICT WITH TO PREVENT CONFLICT WITH VEHICLES VEHICLES PER MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE 19.124.040: CURBED.PLANTER STRIPS ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. PLANTER SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE END OF STRIPS WITHIN THE PARKING LOT PLANTER STRIPS EACH PARKING. AISLE, AND ALL MEET MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENTS. CURSED PLANTER STRIPS ARE STRIPS SHALL BE THREE FEET IN LOCATED PER CODE AT THE END OF .WIDTH BY THE LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING STALL EACH AISLE TWO MAIN PEDESTRIAN PATHS HAVE PER MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE BEEN ESTABLISHED AND IMPROVED 19.124.040: ADEQUATE PEDESTRIAN TO'PROVIDE'. ENHANCED PAVING PEDESTRIAN PATHS PATHS SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE PARKING CROSSINGS, AND VEGETATIVE BUFFER. ENLARGED LOTAANDSCAPE AREAS PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE NODES WITH AMENITIES ARE LOCATED AT ROW PER MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE 19.124.040: TREESREQUIRED TO MEET ALL TREES PROPOSED ON-SITE ARE MINIMUM TREE SIZE COD FOR DEVELOPMENT OF E OFF STREET PARKING SHALL BEA 24' BOX MINIMUM N MUM MINIMUM OF 15 GALLON SIZE PER MUNCIPAL CODE COMMERCIAL GROSS FLOOR AREA: 126,567 PROPERTIES OF 20,000 SF OR MORE 128.567 X .025 = 3214 SF MUST PROVIDE COMMON OPEN SPACE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 2.57. COMMON OPEN SPACE OF THE GROSS FLOOR AREA PROVIDED:12,020 SF G W do U� m r LLI O Z VU LL� r � N� Z / z LL W jCLULIH =) C) (n L) U Ll.l Lf)v n O N • Project Number T-0323 Pmt.: Version: IC -fig: D. -By M. Morgan Checked By R. Kopff LANDSCAPE NORTH PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET1,200 =2�0�4�D _��0 kPv d notPs EXISTING PLANTER / PLANTING ISLAND TO REMAIN (TYP) PROPOSED PLANTER W/ LOW WATER -USE, DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTINGS (TYP) PROPOSED CAFE -STYLE SPILL -OVERS SEATING (TYP) PROPOSED SMALL ORNAMENTAL TREE AT KEY PEDESTRIAN ENTRY POINTS (TYP) PROPOSED SHADE TREE TO COMPLEMENT EXISTING PARKING LOT TREES (TYP) PROPOSED RAISED PLANTER W/ INTEGRATED BENCH SEATING (TYP) PROPOSED ENHANCED PLAZA PAVING (TYP) PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING (TYP) PROPOSED DECORATIVE BOLLARD (TYP) a PROPOSED TACTILE WARNING STRIP (TYP) NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 4O 0 TARGETe 1000 NICOU.ET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)>> horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE ti0 SAN JOSE, CA 05113 KEYPLAN Description lDaateNo. �Ol 1�p GO W ci m Ys u1 m Z �Q I-- cn OL Q Wzz W� LJ � to 5 0 N • Project Number T-0323 Prot: VBrsicn:. IConfip: D_ 13Y _ M. Morgan Ch—l-IBy ----------'R. Kopff LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 _------ 1 X !71 NfIJ i• .Jl (��EI'i!Ii�k� i.IIfI It I�IP(j 4 BIKEARKING tI NVi 1IIII IIIIIII' I7ii;E:i .cli r �' ii;I' ��Si -i -a' ' I€ , i /1 W - v.• _`' 1- _--- --'---`.--.--- -ALVVSDi\l — .__._._,.,,� .-. -_._ .._.. _._....____.__.____ _...._..._ _ _._ ._...... _-y._ .. ` .., a i JJ ,-,",Y.''r;�4t\x'.,�s_t_r)'•%'.' "�L ��•it�,' ,). Ka_aa�_o•O 0 57 N .. s� .I. 13 a ° c tl ° ° V a `o.:r � Z r��o°ooaO-OoOooFs. _T_:._( .._.SO:.°-OT, BIKE PARKING � , . .1—..1 " .i• .k,r....e(-.:°` •j_��__T .'`i_;-:r__�!-nn3',°cSotloa �ac.f€•,.._.G^ ....,,�..:<.:: o � '':,1�i ?,' ,S.�'.�.•ii �.Ene�:�.Ciai._'r "y-)aaciO.��S°ogS..i,t r -(• ,o `E,•O°aca"oO0, "�V1tetE14cN..Sv.a'I_RCza °_O I: . < _ ya€e 20745 ST reQiJ:_, Oo o :, a 11 �-�I;""= �- = fi::>"^,'.7,:,. '�,'„,..' :y�,: .<� ,J ,:: �.RyoCuaaurac%{ -_•••••• , r-�.GI. -_o��° ir» r-.-`. i )� g `� aoOOoV,';c,' [ j +: CREEKBOULEVARD - - -_ (A PUBLIC SiT_REM ......... ..... ... --'—,-_.._______._....—_—.___..._��:=::•_•_•�- t=--�'�_=' — y ....... .. < '��\\\ •'' (A PUBLIC STREET) - - -r r-• - - __ _ -_... .___.... "� 20745 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD OE STORY NO 351BUtLCINC HEIGHT 126.567 : SQ. FT. 2 SECURE (PER EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS) PARKING PARCELONE S. -SR ?LiE5 a �1Unn.:nnU•— �tcaO aaa¢�a�o -�w .=o.OO0aUnncJ_nQ ' R owUnn.°wQ.l _ ti.'A:-.-.'a...W.^g_:..�a..._ Q:._y t tT°,OO.•o4-_^°-... ,•--:_..��_�.._�.:..'q.y.. .._<-._..^.....°aoa.cc°N: G �,r_S.oaac-- ._ .__•.• I �.--.,_-.•.-_.a.-•.�—•."..Oo9.n°a..:.: a o 8 BIKE PARKI _0 _ - - �—_'- _ - r__ ----OSx*..._._.-..--^'. v _.., 4= - ,- - - - _ -- - ___-___.......___.__.__. 0, '\_a L :. o O <a: BIKE w. c-.r_\;_'•iY. .,.rIF�..'<-!.a�_•+�aj, ° ° �j-j•'`�.-- tt+IiI�IE`,. lice'4<�{u_5 ��h°oa2'° �L��.r��IIk(_^-'�—___-.t_\ '_--_ _-.--- ,`F.`I�" i IIIii �=. III r t0_c-, R-� T -S OI.. _I3C),lly_dxk[2. i ➢-../,/_Ii•�..,./—..-� .3� �y.:t—a1 { ]I[ P RCEL �� 3 O.R1699, � , f -.I_ �'-_- 1 - - IIII I / / / - LEGEND ONSITE BIKE CIRCULATION BUS STOP STORE ENTRANCE EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE BIKE PARKIN Ga CONCRETE SIDEWALK ASPHALT PAVEMENT :i:✓,1,::;"�jl±,�;l.�`;' 3•`P•a;tT' ; CONCRETE PAVERS TRUNCATED DOMES LANDSCAPE BIORETENTION AREA ENHANCEDPAVING0 TOTAL BIKE PARKING REQUIRED: 26 (1 SPACE PER 5,000 SF OF BUILDING) 26 SHORT TERM PARKING 2 SECURE PARKING 28TOTAL , - ORTH (D mleymMorn EST_ SAN DO STRLU�c�EnET SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 0e3� WFERNANO��U KEYPLAN 5Y 21 Date N0. Description 1m3118 EntitlemenSubmal 1PROVIDED: 3123118 EnIl .ts S.bmal2 0116 EntIMS.bmial3 Q J S LU S LU CID QUv(. UZZ LI IW\�� LU LU � L'3T P.J.d Nebe-032 Pao: version: conay:a Dasl9nedBY J. Kirby Checkd By M.Johnson BIKE CIRCULATION zo. ...... ate- I LEGEND i� kQ ........... PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AL VE SUS STOP — — — — — — (A PUBLIC STREET) STORE ENTRANCE . . ....... ................. rA k.......... Yfj� EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE OPEN SPACE AREA (SEE L2.0 FOR CALCULATIONS) ."1 a 01 CONCRETE SIDEWALK ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETEPAVERS 0 TRUNCATED DOMES . ..... LANDSCAPE X, 0 X, SIORETENTION AREA of l 1='F"' / / I ENHANCED PAVING 0 3 o 6 o o 1 20745 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD / / / ONE STORY BUILDING o Q o F:% 41 BUILDING HEIGHT o 8.567 z SO. Fr. 75 o o (PER EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS) o nPARCEL ME 4 PAR(T-i I 4, o o T-1 r 10% ;;-Ax . .......... . 0 0 001 0 0 L 0 iRoo — (1 1.0— 0 0 0 0 1C D 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 > 0— r PA. IOU o0 'P CEL THREI 0111 &ENTA ()Vl 0 0 Oi L q �A . . ................ ................ ..... - - - .. . ..... . . ... ... . ...............• . . . STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD -- — — — — — — — — — (A PUBLIC STREET) — — — — — — — — — -- — — — ..... ............... . . X� . . . . .... .. .......... t ._ . . ........ -Z" NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 L TARGET® 1OW NICOULET MALL MINNEAPOUS.MNS-5403 KimlepMorn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET. SUITE 280 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 11=18 EnfitlemeM Submittal I 32311 EnUtlelamda Submital2 JI A 111 I-11 4 0- �'�J LOD Lu (7) x< C) C.) wd ZZ LLJ W H > C, C/) C-) to CD CD 1711 • Pmj.dN-b., T-0323 Prato: I Verelan: lc,ffg: D,,Ign,d By J. Kirby Checked By M. Johnson PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN L3.1 Ula / r'• c,. La zo. ...... ate- I LEGEND i� kQ ........... PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AL VE SUS STOP — — — — — — (A PUBLIC STREET) STORE ENTRANCE . . ....... ................. rA k.......... Yfj� EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE OPEN SPACE AREA (SEE L2.0 FOR CALCULATIONS) ."1 a 01 CONCRETE SIDEWALK ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETEPAVERS 0 TRUNCATED DOMES . ..... LANDSCAPE X, 0 X, SIORETENTION AREA of l 1='F"' / / I ENHANCED PAVING 0 3 o 6 o o 1 20745 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD / / / ONE STORY BUILDING o Q o F:% 41 BUILDING HEIGHT o 8.567 z SO. Fr. 75 o o (PER EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS) o nPARCEL ME 4 PAR(T-i I 4, o o T-1 r 10% ;;-Ax . .......... . 0 0 001 0 0 L 0 iRoo — (1 1.0— 0 0 0 0 1C D 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 > 0— r PA. IOU o0 'P CEL THREI 0111 &ENTA ()Vl 0 0 Oi L q �A . . ................ ................ ..... - - - .. . ..... . . ... ... . ...............• . . . STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD -- — — — — — — — — — (A PUBLIC STREET) — — — — — — — — — -- — — — ..... ............... . . X� . . . . .... .. .......... t ._ . . ........ -Z" NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 L TARGET® 1OW NICOULET MALL MINNEAPOUS.MNS-5403 KimlepMorn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET. SUITE 280 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 11=18 EnfitlemeM Submittal I 32311 EnUtlelamda Submital2 6120I18 Entij,mentsSub U.13 1 1 0- �'�J LOD Lu (7) x< C) C.) wd ZZ LLJ W H > a_WWi-- CL D C/) C-) to CD CD 1711 • Pmj.dN-b., T-0323 Prato: I Verelan: lc,ffg: D,,Ign,d By J. Kirby Checked By M. Johnson PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN L3.1 r. . . .......... . �__ ; ! ;`:' � d�S w A `� it a. �r'`' I a � '' •-- ..._.._.. 4�.z'-`...�,...- �1S � f'' — — LEGEND PREORDERCKUP ......... . . ............... . . ......... . ... .. .. PI AL,VS DRIVE FAMILY TRIP (A PUBLIC STREET) EVERYDAYTRIP ... ............ . . ....... .. . .......... .. . . .... - ---- -------------------- -J-.N SERVICE _7 ...... 0 NEIGHBORHOOD CIRCULATION 0, j, rTj Ll 0 4,44 7 BUS STOP ; �7— I71. 0 STORE ENTRANCE EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE r of 0 o O // , 7L. 0 i 20745 STEVEN'S CREEK HOLILEVARV I a Z: 0 0 ONE STORY BUILDING BUILDING HEIGHT 128.567 � SQ. Fr. 7 (PER EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS) 0 PARCEL ONE PARCII i i it 0 S1.259 ACRES PREORDER PICK UP 0 77 t2 PREORDER I ,(-,DRIVETHRU o t ICK UP f �f / hi I.U 0 0 0 1-75� 0 qj/ _2 II t t ........ ... 'i 0 0 2.0745 7 r Pull TPRPR'-� 1 I I Ff 1H.1i I 1 111-1 1 11 �i9 I I IP I IT D O.R 16'Al,, (1.32 , 1. I .ti. CC, LU III lq 0• ?l Y) . .............. ........ ............. — F. STEVENS CREEKBOULEVARD (A PUBLIC STREET) .. ........ .... ................... ... ... ---- - ---- - - ----------- NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 ## ## 0 t6me!nmmmimil lE TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS. MNS5403 KimleVANiorn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 1N 8 EnbtlemsM BubmMl 1 3123116 EnUtlemenle Submfttal 2 6/20118 EWI—ft S.b.Yd.l 3 0 LU Lu a) < in 0 Z z <11 LLj > LU I- D— D- LU LLI I-- CF D C/) 0 LO CD CD 0 Project Number T-0323 p., Version. COMig: Designed By J. Kirby Checked By M. Johnson VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN L3.2 30' "707 s• -1)(5) �n, ';� - �2 1 3 1 17 j •9t1'- {\9 )nm- A Al. A2 Q Xi "% � a � . ,�. i .. .. ', �sS, ......; _ .,' aav;, 7 a �«_ Eronizai �„ccosy;.c,o,ni ._._.-._.—. � - rroauaxrN.wvone3vin.oua-_.-,_.....—._a ewpvr 0 EASTEXTERIOR ELEVATION �uF. ,",•.,.�• z� �::—IWYLttnN ,\ r,. l~ / �:— �� MTVpli:�^� Rmsi,9Euyi�rA—._.___._../ No]OBp19U.Wix PNNIFp9RA0.q xW9LON,ALN90UBMfm,0.y01 PNM®sn!:4—�� @, .SOUTHA: ERIOR ELEVATION 't u A Al. A2 Q Xi "% � a � x 7 a �«_ Eronizai �„ccosy;.c,o,ni ._._.-._.—. � - rroauaxrN.wvone3vin.oua-_.-,_.....—._a vumEosiucco '- i�uimx 0 EASTEXTERIOR ELEVATION �uF. ,",•.,.�• 't u A Al. A2 Q � a � x 7 a �«_ ` i'— NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION not '_L r.v WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATI.OM ...... ... _._.-__—.—. _____.__...... nzo, 's'criiE: am ,-0• EXISTING SIGN AREA;. SOUTH ELEVATION = 200 SQUARE FEET PROPOSED SIGN AREA: SOUTH ELEVATION (19 X 10') =100 SQUARE FEET EAST ELEVATION (7 X 71 = 49 SQUARE FEET WEST ELEVATION (TX 7') = 49 SQUARE FEET TOTAL AREA =198 SQUARE FEET TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5UD3 PARTNERS brentl :operetlons,bulld. i wene�w i �eiw,oNfao WOPMTRER&cou I No .. ................................... —' W Y O N zU't a)o Wa) LO >M m I WLD 1 LD U0 I CV i P,,q,.t Number T-0323 Devro By Author iCb kaaey-- -- -- Checker EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A201 :9 + + + + m TMv fnagNruvb fana.Es. bwoeL !!E43. DETML iTEb15. TND GiE:%:IF �NFORANTIPN. THE ELEME T3iN lN�b R F. ME tt P.E ACDRPORATEO d1TU .:L CEIVNO �YYC EIECRtMAt PLAYS vR,-pi,CED BV T 2 AFCNRE:.T N%P EMLNEER. N.a!IP COPYAND ELF.CttiCka: 9R:NiS PP'Hn5 f!:f Mf kOTTO BE �SSIEDTSgNSTRCVTAk WCVIAPX•b. the flghdng practice P.j-t Nan T-0323 CUPERTINO T#323 C U P ETIN ® -,,L,-P- 103 SITE LIGHTING �° �,LP-103 SIDE UGHTINGM.W p;. <.,w.,.a „�.. }� 9 k t f�,9r Z�, 4u„ .,. ,w�,;.