Loading...
Reso 3023 9-U-83 (Amended) CITY OF CUPERTINO 10430 So. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLZJTION No. 3023 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AND AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO DELETE REFERENCE TO REQUIRED USE OF ZERO LOT LINE CONFIGURATIONS, AND TO ESTABLISH DWELLING UNIT HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for Amendment of an existing Use Permit, as described on Page 2 of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application. ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application meets the following requirements: a) That the use or uses are in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino, and are not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. • b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. c) That the proposed use will not generate a level of traffic over and above that of the capacity of the existing street system. d) That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed uses, nor injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application 9 U-83 (Amended) as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of April 27, 1987, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. • RESOLUTION No. 3023 (9-U-87 Amended) 04/27/87 Page - 2 - SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No(s) 9-U-83 (Amended) and 13-EA-87* Applicant: Gregory Group, Inc. Property Owner: Same Location: South side of Rainbow Drive between Bubb Road Stelling Road Parcel Area (Ac) : 106 SECTION III: CONDITIONS AEMI ISTERED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval of the Use Permit Amendment is based on Exhibits A, A-1, A-3, B, B-1, B-2, B-3, Info 1, Info 2, Info 3 of Application 9 U-83 (Amended) , except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. EXHIBIT A -- LIMITATIONS All notations on Exhibit A pertaining to the proposed use of an existing house on the site shall be considered informational only. No use entitlements for said structure are conveyed under this Use Permit Amendment action. 3. APPROVED ANENEMENTS 4111 Conditions of approval for Use Permit 9-U-83 as described in the City Clerk's letter of April 24, 1984 shall remain in effect except as amended by the following revisions: Condition 16(a) is hereby amended as follows: The number of second story dwellings located in the development and adjacent to Rainbow Drive and Upland Way shall be limited to no more than 50% of the total number of dwellings located in the development adjacent to said streets. All other dwelling units shall be designed such that no more than 40% of the total roof area for each dwelling unit exceeds a height of twenty (20) feet above adjoining grade. No portion of the roof of any dwelling unit shall exceed a height of twenty-six (26) feet above adjoining grade. Condition 16 (e) shall provide as follows: Dwelling units shall be placed on individual lots in accordance with the Exhibits enumerated in Condition 1 of this Resolution. All previous requirements to include zero lot line residential units within the project are deleted. RESOLUTION No. 3023 (9-U-87 Amended) 04/27/87 Page - 3 - 411 4. DISTRIBUTION OF DWETTTNG UNITS A) Distribution of dwelling units by floor plan for the "5000" type shall be subject to staff review at the building permit level to ensure an adequate relationship between adjacent one and two story building elements for control of building mass. Staff may require adjustment of any selected floor plan on a given site, in accordance with the following guidelines: 1) Single story elements shall be oriented toward the entrance to each private cul de sac. 2) At least 50% of the dwellings fronting on an individual cul de sac street must have adjoining single story portions. (The intent is to produce wider gaps between units to reduce perceived mass and retain views of internal landscaping. 3) No portion of a second story element facing a private street may extend to the lower story front building line. In the event that the developer disputes the staff's interpretation of the guidelines in selection of a floor plan for a given lot, the developer may return to the Planning Commission for a final decision as an item of Old Business on the agenda of a regular meeting. B) The total square footage of the development for the 5000 and angled lot line units shall be no more than ten percent of the baseline for the 1985 Use Permit approval. The baseline shall be 111) defined by distributing units of each type equally across floor plans submitted at that time and totaling the square footage reulting therefrom, provided that there is no proof to the contrary of an approved distribution of units by floor plan type. 5. PRIOR CONDITIONS All conditions attached to Zoning Action 25-Z-80, 9 U-83 (Revised) and 3-TM-85, including all amendments and Minute Order actions pertinent thereto, shall remain in effect and unchanged except where specifically modified by the terms of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of April, 1987 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: CONJYtESSIONERS: Sorensen, Adams, Claudy, Szabo NAYS: COMMISSIONERS: Chr. Mackenzie ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ATTEST: APPROVED: r c • Mark Ca h Do ckenzie, 4rman Associat Planner Cupertino Planning Commission