Reso 247826-U-83
RESOLUTION NO. 2478
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
AN 18,000 SO. FT. TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING ON
SITE A AND INSTALL IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING A
FUTURE BUILDING PAD, ON THE FRONT PARCEL (SITE B).
APPLICANT: John Vidovich !ndrew P. Jara)
ADDRESS: 1307 South Mary Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94087
SUBMITTED: December 15, 1983
LOCATION: North side of Stevens Creek Boulevard 200 ft. west
of Blaney Avenue
,FINDINGS AND SUBCONCLUSIONS:
Approval is subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and
subconclusions as set forth in the minutes of the Planning
Commission meeting of January 23, 1984.
CONDITIONS:
1-14. Standard Conditions
Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not
conflict with the special conditions enumerated herein.
In the event a conflict does exist, the special conditions
as enumerated herein shall apply.
(/415. Approved Exb bits `
The approval is based 04mn•Exhibits A 2nd Revision
B 1st Revision,tand 9-1 of Application 26-U-83 as may be
amended by additional conditions contained herein. 1,
16. Trip Constraint
A That land use intensity shall be limited to an intensity
that will not generate more than 16 one-way trips per acre
during the peak hour- period. For the purpose of the 16
one-way Traffic Intensity Performance Standard, the
following accounting of trips is hereby incorporated into
the project approval:
Trigs A11U&ated to tho_Proigct Area:
1.79 acres x 16 = 28.6
1r1e3_rzen1(rated
Offices
22,000 sq. ft. x. 1.0 trips/1,000 sq. ft. = 22
Commercial
1,600 sq. ft. x 2.0•trips/1,000 sq. ft. = _3_2_
Subtotal = 25.2
It uture Offices
1,600 sq. ft. x 1.0 trips/1,000 sq. ft. = _1_6
Total - 26.8
Surplus = 1.8 Trips
(after future development)
t
,lanning Commission Resolution No. 2478 (cc -it'd) 26-U-83
In the event a development does not utilize a full 16
trips per acre allotted by the Trip End Performance
Standard, the owner of record shall have the ability to
either retain, sell, or transfer trips with other property
owners within the SteFvens Creek Boulevard area subject to
3 the procedures and requirements as listed in the Traffic
Intensity Performance Standard Policy Manual as adopted by
the City Council. All sales or transfers of trips shall
be filed with the Planning Director and City Clerk. No
sale or transfer shall be finally consummated until a use
permit has been approved for the property to which the
trips are to bit applied. The applicant shall record a
covenant to describe the trip acre constraint and the
total number of trips allocated to the particular
development at the time of development approval. The
covenant shall be worded in a manner to suggest that the
future purchaser of properties consult the individual'use
permit files to obtain an up-to-date status report of
trips allocated to each particular group.
Ll17. Aeerov_ed_Construction
Approval is granted to construct a new 18,000 sq. ft.
office building on Site A. The future 1,600 sq. ft-
single-story office building (Site B) shall require
subsequent use permit review to evaluate consistency of
architectural treatment, and adequacy of parking. During
the interim period,, the building pad on Site B shall be
planted with grass.
V16. Land Uses i
Approval is granted to permit general office uses
throughout the entire site and the continuation of limited
commercial activities within the 1,600 gq. ft.
single -story building fronting on Stevens Creek Boulevard.
Limited commercial activities shall include retailing,
copying services, commercial real estate offices. No
restaurants or bars are approved for this building under -
the present use permit. The applicant shall have the
option of applying for a new use permit for different
types of commercial uses provided that he can demonstrate
they are of a limited commercial nature and will not
generate excessive traffic or exceed the trip constraint
for the area.
�"� S.� �egi_eCo-cal Ingress/Egress
The applicant shall enter, into reciprocal ingress/egress
easements with the adjoining property to the wedt and to
the east. The applicant shall monitor late evening
parking from off -site sources. If parking problems
result, the applicant shall be responsible for mitigating
such problems. One possible mitigation measure would be
to close off the area during late evening hours.
ti
canning Commission Resolution No. 2478 (cont'd) 26-U-83
Architectural Materials_and Landscaping
lF
The applicant shad be required to install improvements
along the frontage of both Parcels A and B including
landscaped improvements, trellis improvements, and
modificatidti of the sidewalk landscaping treatment to be
consistent with the Stevens Creek Boulevard Landscaping
and Sidewalk Standard. Additionally, the existing
building shall be painted a color to match the proposed
new building on Site A.
The landscaping and painting projects for Site B shall be
completed prior to occupancy of the proposed new building
on Site A.
The applicant shall return for informal review to the
Architectural and Site Approval Committee to evaluate the
architectural materials and colors, and landscaping.
Neighboring property owners shall be notified of the
Architectural and Site Approval Committee meeting.
t PrgQ92S4 Pedestrian Easemftnt Condition
Pedestrian easements (over the sidewalk area)' shall be
prepared by the applicant, reviewed by the Citv Attorney
and recorded on the subject property prior to issuance of
building permits.
22. Packing
Parking shall be provided at a ratio of one space for
every 230 sq. ft. of gross floor area for office
development and one space for every 200 sq_ ft. of gross
floor area for commercial. In the first phase
construction tSite A), the applicant shall have the
ability to provide up to five (5) secured bicycle locker
spaces which may be provided in lieu of an equivalent
number of packing spaces.
In the event that the applicant or subsegLwnt property
owner desires to wake any minor changw, alteration or
amendment in the approved development plan or building
permit. a written request and revised development plan or
building permit shall be submitted to the Director of
Planning and Development. If the Director crf Planning and
Development makes a finding that the changes are minor and
do not affect the general appearance of the area or the
interests of owners of property within or, adjoining the
development area. the Director of Planning and Development
may certaiv the change on the rrvivee? plan. If such
approval is withheld, the applicant may appeal to the
Planning Commission. If the changes are material. the
Director of Planning and Development shall submit the"
change to the Planning Commission for approval. If the
change is denied by the Planning Comsission, the
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2478 (cont'd) 26-U-83
23. hliE!or Changes (continued)
applicant may appeal to the City Council as provided in
Ordinance No. 652 of the City of Cupertino. If the change
is approved, an appeal may be made by an interested
R party. Further, �y member of the City Council MAY
request a hearing befre the Council, said request to be
made within ten (10) ays from date of approval - when the
change has been approved by the Planning Commission.
I
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23th day of January, 1984, at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino,
Stag of California by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Adams, Koenitzer, Szabo, Chairperson
Blaine
NAYS- None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Claudy
ATTEST:
_jsLbort Co— /st Shama &JAM
Robert Cowan ' Sharon Stain, Ehasrparmn
Planning Cowmisssion
Assistant Planning Director
i
s
:3
h
w