PC 06-26-61
P. O. BOX 597
AL 2-4505
C I T Y 0 F CUP E R TIN 0
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION--June 26, 1961.
Place:
Time:
10321 So. Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rdad
8:00 P.M.
I SALUTE TO THE FLAG
II ROLL CALL:
Commissioners Absent:
Adamo (8:38), Eagar, Fitch, Leonard,
Rampy, Snyder and Small
None
City Clerk, Cit~ Manager (10:15), City
Engineer (10:15), City Attorney (10:25)
MEETING - June 12, 1961
Commissioners Present:
Staff Present:
MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS
The minutes of the regular meeting of June 12, 1961 W3re
approved, with the following correction: Page 6, last paragraph,
5th line - change "2" to "5".
III COMMUNICATIONS:
A. Written:
(1) County of Santa Clara Planning Department: Revised work
sheet - proposed hillside development standards.
(2) County of Santa Clara Planning Department: June issue
of ¡¡ Santa Clara Plans".
r
(3) County Planning Commission: Summary of actions, regular
meeting of June 7, 1961.
(4) County Planning Commission: Agenda for June 21, 1961.
(5) County Planning Department: Plot plan for Albert &
Sigfrid Nelson Golf Course, south side of Stevens Creek Road be-
tween Byrne and Scenic Boulevard; considered by "H" Control on
June 20, 1961 and Planning Commission on June 21, 1961.
(6) Mark Thomas & Co.: Neighborhood plans; City of
Cupertino.
(7) League of California Cities: Announcement of annual
conference, in San FranclscO, October 22--25. 1961.
Moved by Commissioner Rampy that the communications be re-
ceived and filed with the exception of the County Planning Com-
mission agenda of June 21, 1961. Seconded by Commissioner Snyder.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
Commissioners:
Eagar, Fitch, Leonard, &~mpy,
Snyder and Small
None
Adamo
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
B. Verbal:
Commissioner Snyder reported that the statement on national
policy by the Committee for Economic Development entitled "Distressed
Areas in a Gt'ow:l.ng Economy" does not pertain to the Cupertino area.
IV HEARINGS SCHEDULED:
A. Stella Gertson: Application to rezone lots 74, 77, 78 and 79,
Map of MontaV"istaPark from R-l:B-2 to C-I-H; Lots 52, 53, 54, and
54A, Map of Los Palmas from R-l:B-2 to C-I-H; 17.5 acres easterly
of Stevens Creek Canyon Rd. from A-2:B-4 to AR. Second Hearing.
doing well by the applioant, by the neighbors or by the City.
Commissioner Fitoh observed that the Commission's previous
considerations of the proper commercial depth rule against the
existing application. Commercial depths have been considered in
the terms of 400 feet or thereabouts.
Other Commissioners agreed that not only the depth, but the
width is inadequate.
Commissioner Leonard suggested a vote for denial on the
possibility that agreement by and between the adjoining owners
might iron out the dimensions and bring a greater area back before
the Planning Commission, thus opening the way to users of a
different sort. The present plan precludes an integrated project.
He said that a mutually suppo~ting application would be of greater
advantage to all.
Moved by Commissioner Fitch that the hearing be closed.
Seconded by Commissioner Leonard.
AYES:
Commi ssioners:
Adamo, Eagar, Fitch, Leonard, Rampy
Snyder and Small
None
None
7-0
NAYS: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
MOTION CARRIED:
Commissioner Snyder moved that the Belcher application for
rezoning of 60' x 180' from R-3-H to C-I-H be denied since the lot
dimensions do not seem adequate for C-I-H development. Seconded
by Commissioner Fitch.
AYES:
Commissioners:
Adamo, Eagar, Fitch, Leonal'd.. Hampy
Snyder and Small
None
None
7-0
NAYS: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Comntlssioners:
MOTION CARRIED:
A. Stella Gertson: Application to rezone lots 74, 77, 78 and
79, Map of Monta Vista Pa~k from R-l:B-2 to C-l-H; lots 52, 53,
54, and 54A, Map of Los Palmas from R-l:B-2 to C-I-H; 17.5 acres
easterly of Stevens Creek Canyon Road from A-2:B-4 to AR. Second
hearing.
The applicant stated that she has nothing to add to her
previous presentation.
Commissioner Snyder referred to a report on the propo&èd re-
alignment of McClellan Road.
The City Manager stated that he has checked with the county
which has no plans for construction on McClellan Road now that the
area has been annexed to the City of Cupertino. McClellan Road
will be realigned at some future date. In response to questions
concerning the specific nature of the C··I-H and AR use, Mrs.
Gertson said that her plans are not definite at this point, but
that she will submit her commercial plans to the Planning Com-
mission at such time as they become definite. She added that she
is willing to abide by the ruling of the Planning Commission and
withdraw any plans not satisfactory,
Ernest J. Hlne, 10327 Westacres Drive, addressed the Planning
Commission and questioned the tavern use at this location, in the
general vicinity of schools and pa.;:-ks. He said he is in favor of
the park, but would like clarification of the plan which would
zcne land for tavern use close to schools. He proposed that d
citizens committee be formed to determine whether the tavemî is
good from a moral and ethical standpoint with respect to its loca-
tion and second that this comnitteo be composed of citizens
representing various neighborhood associatlvns, church groups and
other civic groups.
Commissioner Snyder observed that the golf course under con~
struction on the adjoining property will in all liklihood dispense
alcoholic beverages.
-3-
Mrs. Curtis Harrison, 21863 Corte l\1adera Lane, told the
Planning Commission that she would like to know more about Mr.
Hine1s specific objection to the tavern.
After further discussion along this line, Conwìssioner Fitch
moved that the hearing be closed. Seconded by Commissioner Bagar.
AYES:
Commissioners:
Adamo, Bagar, Fitch, Leonard, Rampy~
Snyder and Small
None
None
7-0
NAYS: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
MOTION CARRIED:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
A five minute recess was held at this point.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Moved by Commissioner Leonard that:
WHEREAS, this property is naturally endowed with much
scenic beauty near a controlled-flow stream normally
backed up by an artificial lake; and
WHEREAS, one or more golf courses are under planning
or development at present; and
WHEREAS, property in this area is pr~bRbly our most
promising for comprehensi ve developm(~nt in varied
recreational uses;
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL\~D that the Planning Com-
mission recommend the rezoning, subject to:
1-12
13
14
The standard conditions outlined in ExJ1ibit D.
Submission of plans to the H Control Committee
before issuance of any building permits.
Review by the City Council of uses intended
to be developed before applicant lets any
contracts or receives any permits.
Seconded by Commissioner Snyder.
AYES:
Commissioners:
Adamo, Bagar, Fitch, Leonard, Rampy,
Snyder and Small
None
None
7-0
NAYS: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
MOTION CARRIED:
Moved by Commissioner Leonard that:
Ì'JHEREAS, the property known as Stella's Tavern has
operated many years at this location and has eVidently
established a tolerance of sorts by neighbors who seem··
ingly regard it as a local convenience; and
WHEREAS, applicant proposes the re-routing of McClellan
to straighten and realign the route which would be of
benefit to the residents and City; and
WHEREAS, the immediate d8dication and development of
additional width for McClellan would serve good public
purposes;
NOVJ. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Com-
mission recommend the rezoning, subject to:
1-12
13
14
The standard conditions outlined in E."ll.ibi t B.
Acceptance by the B1.Ülding Inspector of all
revisions in thr, rem.)delled tavern b¡¡:Llding.
Presentation to ths City of signed agreements
~cceptable to the COlmcil and City Attorney
providing for the realigned McClellan route.
-4-
Seconded by Comndssioner Snyder
AYES:
Commissioners:
Adamo, Eagar, Fitch, Leonard, Rampy,
Snyder and Small
Noæ
None
7-0
NAYS: Commissioners:
ABS:ENT: Commissioners:
MOTION CARRIED:
Prior to the voting on the motion, the Co~nission discussed
the normal exercise of police powers including the alcoholic bever-
age control agency.
Moved by Commissioner Leonard that:
WHEREAS, the location is at the corner of two traffic
arteries (Stevens Creelc--Mt. View Rd. and ~1cClellan)j
and
ìqHEREAS, the area contains a small commercial develop-
ment on the west side of Stevens Creek-Mountain View Road
which is evidently of local convenience in the neighbor-
hood; and
WHEREAS, the immediate dedication and improvement of
additional width would be of benefit to the City and
residents of the areaj
N01¡J. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Com-
mission recommend the rezoning, subject to:
1-12
13
The standard conditions outlined in R~hibit B.
Submission of plans to the II Control Committee
and approval by them prior to issuance of
any building permits
Seconded by Commissioner Eagar.
AYES:
Commi ssioners:
Adamo, Bagar, Leonard, Rampy,
Snyder and Small.
Fitch
None
6-1
NAYS: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
MOTION CARRIED:
Commissioner F:J.tch stated that he is generally in agreement
with the motion, but his negative vote is occasioned by the fact
that the applicant had previously stated she would submit building
plans to the Planning Commission, in addition to the fact that a
previous applicant was denied largely due to lack of plans at the
time of hearing.
D. Louis Stocklmeir: Application to rezone from R-l:B-2 to
R-3-H, C-I-H and R-l property situatcd along Stevens Creek Road
near Scenic Boulevard and Crescent Road. First hearing.
Mr. Stocklmeir said that his application has been pending
for considerable time. In responSe to questions, he estimaced that
the C-I-H zone constitutes about 9,000 square feet, the R-3-H
zoning constitutes about 2t acres, and the R-l between 5 and 6
acres.
Commissioner Leonard said he is not sure that the applieant's
laclc of precise plans is favorable, but he does think tha.t tl1e
location of the property rules against R-l zoning, He added that
commercial recreation could be a logical and beneficial use of the
property.
The applicant agreed that the~e is little hope for residential
use of the property sho~m on the application as C-I-H and R-3-H.
Commissioner Snyder recoMmended that the Planning Comwission
survey the property prior to the second hearing.
The Chairman called for comments from the audience and there
were none.
-5-
Moved by Commissioner Leonard that the first hearing be
closed. Seconded by Commissioner Eagar,
AYES:
Commissioners:
Adamo, Eagar, Fitch, Leonard, Rampy,
Snyder and Small
None
None
7-0
NAYS: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commi ssione rs:
MOTION CARRIED:
The Chairman scheduled July 7, 1961, at 7:00 PM, as the time
for a field trip to the Stoclclmeir property, the group to meet
and leave from City Hall.
E. E. R. Barens: Application for Use Permit for used car
business, east side of Highway 9, 198' north of Stevens Creek
Road, C-I-H zone.
E. R. Barens told the Planning Commission that the property
is owned by Joseph LaDato who intends to execute a short term leaße.
Mr. Barens said that the property is not ready for the exploj.tation
to its full potential at this time. The proposed use car business
will relieve a temporary eyesore, he said, and also that it would
be a successful venture which would mean considerable sales tax
revenue to the City. In response to a question, he indicated that
light mechanical work plus auto polishing and cleaning would be
done. He plans to sell nothing older than 1956 model cars. He
said the agreement would involve 30 to 60 day leases with equiva-
lent notices, due to the possibility that the owner may wish to
start permanent improvements at any time. The adjoining Texaco
station would be used for rest room facilities.
Commissioner Rampy asked whether the applicant planned to in-
stall full improvements. Hr. Barens said he could not say \~hether
or not the owner is prepared to make the standard City improvements
at this time in order to secure a use permit.
Commissioner Snyder proposed the possibility of a limited use
permit and asked the applicant if a use permit for a specific
period of time would be acceptable. The applicant indicated no
serious objections.
The City Attorney advised that use permits can be issued for
a stipulated length of time and can be subject to review by the
Planning Commission or can be continuous until such time as a com-
plaint or complaints are lodged, whereupon the use permit would
automatically come before the Planning Comm.1.ssion for review. The
latter course would mean the least difficulty for the operator and
for the Commission, he said.
Commissioner Fitch asked the City Attorney to verify the
necessity for the use permit for a used car lot. The City Attorney
consulted Ordinance 002(b) and reported that a use permit is re-
quired by the City for a used car business.
The Chairman called for comments from the audience, and aslced
that the record indicate there were no comments for or against the
applicant.
Moved by Commissioner Leonard that;
WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned C-I-H, located near
the intersection of two main arteries, and owned by LaDato;
and
WHEREAS, applicant states he would be leasing on a short
term basis pending development of a higher use by the
owner; and
WHEREAS, immediate dedication and improvement of the
additional width of Higlmay 9 would be in the public
interest;
Nm~, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the use perrni t be
granted subject to:
-6-
1-12 Usual conditions in Exhibit B extending the
facilities startGd with the Texaco station.
13 Submission to the City of a signed agreement
with the owner of the Texaco station, running
with the land, assuring use of the rest room
facilities to employees and customers of
applicant1s business.
14 Posting of a bond for removal of used car lot
incidentals at the time of termination.
15 Restrictions on the use limiting repairs and
maintenance to light work; No wreclcing yard
operations; no body work before 8:00 AM or
after 6: 00 PM.
16 Permit is to run for 5 years subject to review
and possible cancellation on any nearest
annual anniversary date in the event there is
written protest and Commission review supports
the objection.
Seconded by Commissioner Fitch.
AYES:
Commissioners:
Adamo, Bagar, Fitch, Leonard, Rampy
Snyder and Small
None
None
7-0
NAYS: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commi ssione rs:
MOTION CARRIED:
F. Ordinance 002(h[: Amending Ordinance No. 002 which ordinance
incorporates Ordinance NS 1200 of the County of Santa Clara by
repealing "Professional Office District" elassification and adding
the classification "Professional Admin:l.strative Zoning" (PO-H) and
further by adding the classification "Light Industrial Parl~ Zoning"
(MI-PH) .
With the consent of the Commission and the citizens in
attendance, the Chairman proceeded to the next item on the agenda
in the interest of those still waiting for hearings.
V UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
A. Toro Development Co.: Application for Variance to Sign
Ordinance, Idlewild Shopping Center. Sign measures 240 sq. ft.
at elevation of 301. Approved by Architectural Committee.
Condi tions.
Toro Development Company was represented by George Oakes.
The drawing of the sign ~Ias posted. The action of the architectural
committee was reviewed.
Commissioner Leonard said that little or no controversy is
apparent in this application, adding he is not, as a rule, in favor
of variances.
The Chairman called for comments from the audience, and there
were none. Moved by Commissioner Leonard that the variance be
granted subject to the recommendation of the Architectural and
Site Control Committee which provides that the base of the sign be
widened to include the whole corner and planters be added.
Seconded by Commissioner Rampy.
AYES:
Commissioners:
Bagar, Fitch, Leonard, Rampy,
Snyder and Small
Adamo
None
6-1
NAYS: Commi s sione rs:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
MOTION CARRIED:
B. Subcommittee report on C-2-H Ordinance.
The report was postponed pending advice of the consulting firm
on the subject.
C. rüscellaneous:
None
-7-
VI NEW BUSINESS:
A. Herbert Ketell: Tentative Map, 10 acres zoned R-3-H;
Northwest corner of Highway 9 & Stevens Creek Boulevard.
Continued.
The new maps which had been received JUne 21 1961, Were
distributed. The recommendation of the City Engineer, dated
Jµne26; was read and there followed a point by point discussion
of the matters referred to in the recommendation by the City
Engineer sp~cifically the pedestrian walkways, the 40' driveway
easement between Beardon and Park Drive and the 2 24' driveway
easements, one on the westerly limits of the property and the other
on the east limits of Lots 20, 21, 22, also the portion described
"to be dedicated .þy others", and the deletion of Saich Avenue.
(An alternate map included Saich Avenue). Certain street sections
are not in conformance with City standards. Street sections are
shown as 36' from face of curb to face of curb instead of 40',
sidewalk areas are sho~m as 12 and 12t feet instead of 10 feet, and
an integral sidewalk is used instead of including a planter strip.
After considerable discussion, the Chairman stated that more
time is needed to reach a conclusion on the matter and he suggested
a joint meeting with the City Council.
Commissioner Fitch said that the Planning Commission could
serve its purpose as a reconunending body by reaching its own con-
clusion which the Council, he said, can either accept or alter,
as it sees fit.
Mr. Kettel, the applciant, stated that he wishes to conform
in every particular. He briefly reviewed the application which iß
designed for 160 families. He made a plea to retain the name of
Park Avenue rather than Alves Drive. The City }1anager advised that
the City Council had just passed a motion to use the name of Alves
Drive rather than Park Avenue as shown.
The Chairman continued the hearing to Friday, July 7, 1961,
at 8:00 PM.
So moved by Commissioner Rampy. Seconded by Commissioner
Fitch.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
Commissioners:
Adamo, Bagar, Fitch, Leonard, Rampy,
Snyder and Small
None
None
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
The Chairman asked that Don Bandley's office be notified that
the Ketell map is being continued to July 7, 1961 at 8:00 PM.
VII ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 12:02 AM to an adjourned regular
meeting July 7, 1961, at 8:00 PM.
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Is/ E. J. Small
ChaiI'lnan, Planning Commission
/s/ Lawrence K. Martin
Ci ty Cleric
-8-