Loading...
PC 09-25-61 10321 SO. SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE ROAD At 2-4505 C I T Y 0 Feu PER TIN 0 CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF' THE REGULAR MEETING or THE PLANNING COMMISSION - September 25, 1961. PLACE: TIME: l0321 So. Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road 8:00 P.M. I SALUTE TO THE FLAG II ROLL CALL: Commissioners Present: Adamo, Frolich, Leonard, Snyder and Sma 11 Commissioners Absent: Rampy Staff Present: City Clerk and Asst. to City Engineer MINUTES Or<' THE PREVIOUS MEETING: September 11, 1961 Minutes of September 11, 1961 were approved as submitted. III COMMUNICATIONSt A. Wri hen: (1) County Planning Commission: Agenda of September 20, 1961. (2) County Planning Commission: Summa!'y of Actions, regular meeting of September 6, 1961. (3) Besteel Co. (Gemco project): Request for approval of continuous runs to 8' fixtures on the underside of the canopy of the Gemco service station in lieu of the rectangular fixtures shown on the drawings formerly submitted and approved by the H Control Committee and the City Council. Commissioner Leonard said the request appeared to be a cheapen- ing of the structure. He proposed that the applicant start up- grading the development instead of downgrading. He is not in favor of exposed 8' tube lighting. The Chairman said the !'equest should be referred to the H Control Committee inasmuch as that body acted on the architectural features of the original application. Moved by Commissioner Snyder ttat the Planning Commission refer the request, letter and drawing, to the H Control COmmittee, pointing out that it tends to cheapen construction and stating that the Planning Commission is in favor of the original drawings. Seconded by COmmissioner Adamo. AYES: Commissioners: NAYS: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: MOTION CARRIED: B. Verbal: None Adamo, Frolich, Leonard, Snyder, Small None Rampy 5-0 IV HEARINGS SCHEDULED: A. FRANK SHEPHARD: from R-l:B-2 to R-1j side of a projection Application No. 40-z-6l to rezone bettleen Vista and Blaney adjoining of Merritt. Second Hearing. 10 acres the south Don MacKay represented Frank Shephard. He aslced the Planning Commission to approve the map subject to the City Engineer's approval of storm drainage. All the lots can be made 7,500 sq. ft or more he said. MacKay & Somþs had delivered new maps containing slight revisions showing several lots with 12 additional feet in order to make 7,500 sq. ft., at approximately 4:00 P.M. on the date of the hearing, September 25. ··1·.. Mr. Perkins stated that he had not seen these maps before. Commissioner Leonard said that we are back to the difficulty of the past wherein the maps have not been sUbmitted in time for proper engineering review. With no chance for the staff to study the maps he proposed that the application be continued. Commissioner Leonard read from the lninutes of September 11, a motion that the storm drainage problem be referred to the City Manager for r~ference to the City Engineer. He, said that the Planning Commissipnshould be given the information it requires to reach a conclusion. The Chairman read the letter of the City Engineer dated September ll, in which he suggests authorization be given for· a detailed storm drainage analysis of this area. Commissioner Leonard said the application should be put over for two weelcs to find out who is <1ragging his feet on the matter. He said the Planning Commission should not be made the fall guy. Commissioner Snyder proposed that the Commission stay with its initial recommendation providing for investigation of storm drain position. He also asked the applicant to bring in evidence of the types of homes intended for the site. Frank Shephard said that the subdivision known as Blue Hills of Saratoga in Saratoga is an example of the kind of houses in- tended for the subject site. Commissioner Leonard maintained that the Planning Commission, in order to evaluate the application properly, should have the pertinent storm drain data and that the Commission has been trying to generate an interest in the storm drain problem on Blaney so that it may be refer~ed to the policy making body, which is the City Council. The Chairman agreed that the Commission" should have tþ.e storm drain information so that it can ,make a proper recommendation to the City Council which will be the deciding body. Commissione!' Leonard read Planning Commission ~esolution 63 with a condition of approval being the filing of an agreement with the City acceptable to the City Attor~ey on legal matters, the City Engineer on engineering and the Council on principle providing for taking this load off the easterly system by the time their run-off needs require lOO% of the system on a basis of ,ordinary risk cal- culations by engineers. Resolution 63 applies to the Ripley Homes application for the rezoning of 2 acres on the easterly side of Blaney Avenue. Mr. Perkins said a slightly different situation prevails in the present application due to its location on the opposite or westerly side of Blaney. The Shephard application, along with Merritt and Mariani Avenue is downstream from the manhole. The storm drain problem appears to be more pressing in this application than in the Ripley application. The storm drain system which will serve the Ripley subdivision on the east side is not the same system which will be used for the west side of Blaney. There were no objections to the application from the audience. Moved by Commissioner Frolich that the second hearing be closed. Seconded by Commissioner Adamo. AYES: Commissioners: NAYS: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners.: MOTION CARRIED: Adamo, Frolich, Leonard, Snyder, Small None Rampy 5-0 Moved by Commissioner Leonard tr~t the Planning Commission recommend favorably the land use r.roposed and approval of the tentative map subjectto.Exhibit 'B" items 1 - 12 and 13 subject to an agreement between the City and Shephard acceptable to the City Attorney on legal matters, the City Engineev or ,engineering matters and the City Council on policy. Seconded ',by Co'mmi.ssioner Frolich. -2- AYES: Commissioners: NAYS: Commissioners: ABSENT: Co~ssioners: MOTION CARRIED: , Adamo, Frollch, Leonard, Snyder, Small None Rampy 5-0 B. MACKAY & SOMPS: Application No. 39-Z-61 to rezone 260' x 168' from R-2-H & R-3-H to C-I-H; south side of Rodrigues Avenue, 3l0' west of Highway 9. Second Hearing. John Racanell1 reprefjented the applicant. He said he would like to amplify his presentation at the first hearing, adding that thè applicant is fully aware that the application should serve the public interest and not merely serve the interest of the applicant. He thinks the present request meets that requirement in all re- spects. He will make, he said, especially to the people residing on Rodrigues Avenue, as many COmmitments as are legally and practically possible . The sole pU!'pose of the application is to allow for professiönal use of the land, not commercial. He said also that he does not consider the application a precedent to make the rest of Rodrigues .Avenue commercial or professional zone. He is willing to have a condition imposed providing that if a building permit is not taken out within a reasonable time in accordance with the presentation now made, then the Commission itself should initiate rezoning back to the present status. Don MacKay stated that he would like to build an office for their engineering firm. They need more space at their present location and their next door tenant also required more space which they \10uld . like to provide. The net frontage for the development would be 128' deducting a 40' half street from the wiëth of the property. This is less than the frontage of two residential lots, such lots being 74' each. The site is adjacent to an exIsting shopping center and he said it would be good f!'om the planning aspect considering its situation and the fact that a single story bùilding would be constructed with shake roof and good landscaping. As such it should be a good buffer. He concluded by saying that the reioning is not sought to sell the property. The Chairman read a letter from MacKay & Somps signed by George E. Somps, stating that purpose of a rezoning is to permit construction of a one~story office building for their own civil engineering operations. Present personnel is approximately 20 and principle engineering involves residential construction. The letter further said that they intend to build a professional office building compatible with the neighborhood including the following design criteria: . approximately 4,000 sq. ft. of office space, single story wood frame and stucco with shake !'oof dèsign, the building to be placed on the westerly portion of the property with parking adjacent to the shopping center. ' , The Chairman asked the audience to state their views. Mrs. Isabel Atkinson, Rodrigues Avenue, stated that this is a commercial enterprise, that we already have a buffer wall at the rear of Allario Shopping Center, and that the property was intended for apartments. The!'efore, she objects to co~~ercial zoning. Mrs. Woodruff, Rodrigues Avenue, said that she cânnot see how the next applicant, Harry Chow forexamþle, can be refused com- mercial if the present application is granted, or if he does not want commercial, he might want apartment zoning as a buffer to the present application. Virginia Norton, ROdrigues Avenue, said that she agreed with the other 2 ladies asking how can the Planning Commission refuse to give Chow commercial if they grant the application of MacKay and Somps. The Chairman said that the pösition of the 3 ladies appears to be similar, that they are all considering the application as commerclal. He asked what their opinion would be if assurance is made that a decent building was going in as a professional office. All the objections are against commercial use he said. He asked whether the neighboring residents would prefer a professional build- ing to apartments. ' -3'- Mrs. Uoodruff asked how the City could be ce!'tain of the type of building and useage and asked how many vehicles would be used at this location. Mr. MacKay said that four pickup trucks would be used serving a purpose similar'to passenger cars. Commissioner Leonard said that in view of the objections by people on Rodrigues Avenue, it is best not to sweep anything under the rug. He compared the side in Cupertino to locations around First and Santa Clara in San Jose stating this distance from the center of town or 4-corners is similar. He questioned whether ROdrigues Avenue is to be held sacred for residential purposes for- ever in view of its nearness to the4-corners. He suggested the area may logically deserve consideration for uses other than resi" dential and .that the Planning Commission should perhaps consider commercial in terms of 1,000 feet not only the 1681 contained in ,the present application. Or, he said, the commission might want to reconsider the Mariani application with the effect of moving the center of town. Mrs. Farran, Scofield Drive, said the!'e are no sidewalks in the subdivision. When school is out the streets are mObbed by children. The commercial activity adj01ningHighway 9 makes it safer for children and other pedestrians to use Western and Rodrigues Avenues within the subdivision. ' Charles LeVezu, 10371 Westacres Drive, asked the Chairman how binding such a' letter of intent would be, such as was p!'esented by MacKay and Somps. The Chairman said in the absence of the City Attorney, that it is his understanding that such a letter would 'not be binding in a .court of law. He asked whether the protestants would havèany objection if they had assurances in ordinance form that such a building will go in and that it would not be commercial. , ' .. . '" . . Mrs. Jarrett said that unless the City can guarantee sidewalks to the subdivision they will be faced with a big fight against commercial. They fear injury to the children. Commissioner Frolich observed that civil engineers are' regis~ered by the State, implying that as such they are responsible people.. 4 trucks might, very well generate ]£6S traffic than another , use such 'as apa!'tment houses. Duplexes, and apartments some of which might have 2 carl;! to the family would create traffic probably in a greater amount than would an engineering office. A member of the audience reminded that all of, the engineering personnel would have cars of their own as well. Commissioner Snyder noted that the truclc traffic would cross in front of three homes only. In response to a question, Mr. rrJ8.cKay said that the four pickup trucks would be used by their survey crews. The office tries to schedule these crews so that they leave at 8:00 and return at 5:00. The trucks are not kept over-night at the engineering office but are driven to the homes of the surveyors~ Commissioner Snyder asked whether the applicant is willing to improve and dedicate. Mr. MacKay answered that they would con- struct a L~OI half street. Commissioner Leonard again raised the question of location and said that future planning may result in 1,000 feet of commercial along Rodrigues Avenue, and that the City should consider the possibility that this is a misplaced subdivision without sidewalks. Commissioner Frolich said he would like to duck the question at the present time, noting that the City Council has apparently selected 500' as the proper depth of commercial property. He would like to avoid any further question of additional commercial until the Planning Commission can get a better idea of pattern in the central area. -4- The Chairman revio\~èd thesurmunding land on ,the aerial map pointing out the location or the residential property already built and under construction, including that much single family residen- tial exists in the immediate vicinity along with some commercial. The position of the Foothill College was noted. The Chairman stated that the area is very well established as an R-l Zone. Mrs. Atkinson said there is a great deal of commercially zoned property in the City and asked why the applicant must invade an R-l distirct. Commissioner Leonard said that the applicant owns the property named in the application and not some other p!'ope!'ty and might not be alLXious to t!'ansfer a prospective tenant to another owner. Commissioner Snyder said that 20 families to the acre would make more traffic than a professional office. Mrs. Atkinson said there is no way to þrevent traffic from the office from gOing west on Rodrigues Avenue over Stellihg. These people would be just as entitled to drive up Rodrigues as anyone else. The Chairman figured there might be 60 cars on the property if it goes into apartment useage. Commissioner Snyder again asked how the residents feel about professional zones. r~rs. Atkinson said that as far,as she is concerned we do not need PO-H à!'C-l"-H. She is satisfied with the zOning as it is at present. Commissioner Adamo stated that Chow may say' that he qannot sell his property as R-l if it is up agaihst commercialprcperty. In that case Chow might apply for R-3. Mr. MacKay said he has. no obj'ection to making the property a commercial zone with the stiþulation that it be used exclusively for professional office. The Chai!'man reit-era ted that the City Attorney has lead the Planning COmmission to understand'that such strains or cortditions will not stand up as a matter of law. ' .Mr. Racanelli agreed· that the City cannot condition the zoning but he emphasized the expression of good faith on the part of the applicant and also suggested that the City employ a method wllereby a building permit must be obtained within a specified time for a professional buildihg.or the Planning Commission'could rezone the property back to the present status. ' The Chairman summarized the situation by saying that the application could either stand or fall as a C-l-"H zoning or it, could be tabled until a PO-H ordinance is in effect. Moved by COmmissi'oner Snyder that the Planning Commission, in view of the fact that the proposed use is not actually commercial, recommend that the application be tabled until adoption of a PO-H ordinance,. Mr. Racanelli stated that the applicant could not afford to have. the matter tabled and he would prefer a decision on the application. ' CommisSioner Snyder retracted his motion. Moved by Commissione!' Leonard that the second hearing be closed.. Seconded by Commissioner Snyder: ' AYES: Commissioners: NAYS: C9mmissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: MOTION CAR~IED:· , Adamo, ,Froliqh, Leonard, Snyder, Small None " Rampy 5-0 -5- Co!l\ßlissionerAdamo /'laid that he is opposed to any commercial use on a residentia.l street,. '" ."MQved by Commlssioner snyder that since the applicant is pres'suril1g the Cómmissionfor a decision and since the application is not intended as an actual commercial use, that the application . be. den:i.ed. Seconded by Commis'sioner Adamo. AYES: Commissioners: NAYS:, Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: MOTION CARRIED: ' ' Adamo, Frolich, Leonard, Snyder, Small ,None, . Rampy " 5-0 Commissioner Leonard said he felt that the Commisslon voted on ,the wrong question and that the matter should not be wrangled out one lot at a time,. The true and essential question he said concerns the future of a residential area with relation to the ,central core of the City. He favored gOing to the heart of such a question rather than fighting the matter out one lot and one application at a time. The Chairman advised the applicant that he has 5 days to appeal. C. HERBERT H. ARONSEN (Simla Lands Ltd.): Application No. l4-v-6l, requesting an exception to the subdivision ordinance to eliminate ,sidewalks for 1,054 I from Stevens Creek to Grant Road; also to curve street around PG&E towers. Continued. Mr. Aronsen stated that the property is zoned M-l-H and, in an apparent reference to the previous meeting" stated that approximateLY one-tenth of his Simla Junction land is used for recreation. He is trying to eliminate the sidewalks in order to reduce expenses. The buildings he contemplates are very expensive ,due to the structural requirements of the property and the fire zone requirements. The Chairman read from the minutes of the last meeting wherein it was moved by Commissioner Leonard that the matter be referred to the C~ty Manager for review and that the applicant return with more information and maps to scale, carried unanimously. The Chairman, read a letter from the City ~~nager on the subject , of the Aronsen application. addressed t~ the Planning CommiSsion. The City Manager corrected the statement of Mr. Aronsenwhere1n he maintained that the City Manager had advised him it would be alright ,to elim4.na,te the sidewalks, because there was no foot traffic. , The lette,rexplaineci thélt. this was not an accurate statement, that the City Manager did not tell Mr. Aronsen that the sidewalks could be eliminated, but that some solution could be worked out either by going around the .towers ,or' moving: the towers. He also -advised the applicant' to get an engineer to prepare plans for the work that he 'proposed to do. ' , , Commissioner Leonard stated, that the M-I-H zoning in effect at Simla Junction is a compromise zoning dUé to the cónglomeration of uses. He characterized the application as a request to continue the present indifferenttrepd of developments. He contended that the City should impose reasonably good lot standa'rds that the owner and builder should abide by so as to upgrade the property. He said he could see no reason to take the position that the public must detour around the towers. ,They should be moved, he said, and he çalled,attention to the fact that the County Planning Department is taking steps to develop a park chain all along the banks of Stevens Creek for many miles. Such recreation facilities would indicate that sidewalks are necessary. Therefore, it would be poor policy to allow the property to develop without sidewalks which are re- quired by the, subdivision ordinance. More than ample off-street parking and/or a pedestrian-oriented use would be the only justi- fication for the absence of sidewalks, said Comm:i.ssioner Leunard. Normally good improvements must be required. This is essentially a request to preserve the status quo or even to retrogress. Mr. Aronsen said tqat he is trying to put up'a class "A" "tilt up" building. In response to a question by the Chairman, Mr. Perkins advised that PG&E is required and will relocate utilities once. -6·· Mr. Aronsen said that he has three interested tenants. Commissioner Leonard said that the applicaht needs what all other applicants present, suf'f'icieht data f'or the Planning Commission to judge the suitability of parking, ingress and egress, etc,. Commissioner Frolich agreed that it is the responsibility of the owner or applicant to present data to the Commission sufficient to enable them to make a determination. . . . . No comments were made from the audience. Moved by Commissioner Snyder that the Planning COmmission close the hearii1g. Seconded by COmmissioner Frolich. AYES: Commissioners: NAYS: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: MOTION CARRIED: Adamo, Frolich, Lëoriard, Snyder, Small None Rampy 5-0 Moved by Commissioner Snyder that since Homestead Road is already established as a 90' right-of-way and since a f!'eeway inter- section will be constructed nearby, the Planning COmmission recommend that the subdivision ordinance be complied With, the motion to be made without prejudice. In response to a question from the Chairman, Mr.Perkinsre- ported that in the case of the Cook & Wilson subdivision, the developers provided the City with a letter from PG&E concerning overhead wires, easements, etc. The Chairman proposed a letter to PG&E stating that the City wants a 90' right-of-way, inquiring as to the position of the utili ty. Commissioner Snyder said if PG&E is told of the 90' right-of- way the issue has been clearly raised by the City. Mr. Perkins stated that PG&Ehas received a copy of all neigh- borhood plans as well as the major street plan showing the widths of roads, including Homestead. Therefore, the City is on record with PG&E that Homestead Road is a 90' right-of-way. Commissioner Leonard said he gets the impression that if the exc~ption is granted, the applicant will proceed with his project, otherwise he will not. . Suppose PG&E is asked to move, the towers and no construction is forthcoming. Commissioner Leonard asked in what position the City would be in that case. He explained that the Aronsens, if they analyze the City's position, will have most of the information that need and can get from the City. Thehwill be the time for them to present the data on their construction projects. The City should simplY reaffj,rm support of the subdivision ordinance and major City street plan. The moving of the' towers would fOllow from the presentation of proper application.· Discussion followed as to whether or not the City should con- tact PG&E relative to the relocation of the towers. Commissioner Snyder retracted the above motion. Mr. Aronsen said that he was told to appear and ask the Planning Commission to advise PG&E of the City's requirements on the subject site. ' Moved by Commissioner Leonard that the Planning Commission re- affirm support of the subdivision ordinance which includes in this case a 90' right-of-way with sidewàlks, and that a copy of the motion be addressed tOPG&E, noting that one or more towers may en~roach on the Aronsen property which lies within the plan line. COmmissioner Adamo aslced who prOvides the liaison between the City and the public utility. Mr. Perkins answered that his office has done this. Commissioner Leonard added that Mr. Aronsen is free to write his own request for the moving of the towers, _7... The foregoing motion was .seconded by Commissioner Snyder. AYES:, Commissioners: NAYS:' 'Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: MOTION CARRIED: A<:iamo, ]'i'rolich"Leonard, Snyder, Small None Rampy 5-0 D. CUPERTINO PROPERTIES (G. Oakes).:'APpli.cation No. 3$-z-6l to rezone Lots 16, 17, 18, 33, 34, 35 of Tract 2880 from R-l to R-2-H. Second Hearing, Mr. Oakes represented: the appli.cant and pres~nted pictures of the proposed duplexes. He alsQ,presented building plans for the structures along with a picture that comes from the sales office in his F'airway Greens Subdivision. He. stated, that it would1:>e an attractive development. Commissioner Leonard aslced whether FHA declined approval of these lots as R-l uses. Mr. Oakes answered in the affirmative. No comments. were made from the audien.ce. Moved by Commissioner Leonard that the hearing be closed. Seconded by Commissioner Adamo. AYES: Commissioners: NAYS: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: MOTION CARRIED: Adamo, Frolich, Leonard, Snyder, Small None Rampy 5-0 Moved by Commissioner Frolich that the application be grante<:i subject to Exhibit "B". Seconded by Commissioner Snyder. J;.damo, Froli.ch, Leonard, Snyder, Small None )1ampy AYES: Commissioners: NAYS: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: MOTION CARRIEÙ: ' Commissioner.Froli.ch said he would like to take,t;his opportunity to compliment Mr. Oakes on the gas station located at the entrance to Idlewild Subdivision. E. REVISED SUBDIYISION ORDINANCE: Hear;!,ng on revision of' Sub- division Ordinance No., 47. Continµed. At the request ot,theÉ:ity At;torney, Commissioner'Leonard pro- posed that the hearing be cOntinued to the next meetirg., The representatives of the Santa Clara County Contractors and Homebuilders have also filed ~ letter requesting that, the hearing on the proposed ordinance be held over until October 9th. So ordered. F. WILLIAM DUNCAN: Application No. 15-V-6l for variance to rear yard requirements, to permit addition of a bedroom. to existing R-l dwelling, approx. 8~ ft. from the fen.ce: Lot 52, Tract 2153. Mr. Duncan lo.cated the property on the map. SPecifical~y the lots is at the intersection of Calabazas Creek and Regnart Creek. , Commissioner Leonard reviewed the fact that the City approved the Idlewild Subdivision with smaller lots than intended for the City as a whole. This was due to the storm drain problem which confronted the City and which cou~d be partially solved through,the construction of Idlewild. This particular lot has no neighbors to the rear and its general location is such as to make the usual purposes of rear setbacks immaterial. If a variance is ever in. order, Commissioner Leonard said, it would seem to be µnder cir.cumstancea akin to the present application. The presence of the creeks satisfies the privacy and setback requirements. -8':' rQ&B has submitted a letter stating they have no objections to bU~ldtng construction on the sout~orly 5' of the 10' public utility eaaement on the north~~~Y boundary of Lot 52, Tract 2153. Moved by COmmdc~ioner Snyder that the hearing be closed. Seconded by COmmissioner Frolich. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: Adamo, Frolich, Leonard, Snyder, Small None Rampy Moved by Commissioner Leonard: WHEREAS, the proposed addit10n is not located near any surrounding homes because of the location of Regnart Creek and Calabazas Creek; and l'JHEREAS, the P.G.& E. is willing to waive the right- of-way for the affected area; NO'!l, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the variance be granted. Seconded by Commissioner Frolich. AYES: Commissioners: NA YS : COmmi s si one rs : ABSENT: COmmissioners: MOTION CARRIED: V UNFINISHED BUSINESS: A. ORDINANCE 002(h): Amending Ordinance No. 002 which ordinance incorporates Ordinance NS 1200 of the Countu of Santa Clara by repealing "Professional Office District" classification and adding the classification" Professional Administrative Zoning" (PO-H) and further by adding the classification "Light Industrial Park Zoning" (MI-PH). Continued. Adamo, Frolich, Leonard, Snyder, Small None Rampy 5-0 The Commission asked whether the letters to the several industries had been mailed as yet. (No.) They said they would lilÅ“ to get the ordinance to the City Council by November. The Chairman said tl~t the Commission might proceed with the ordinance although it has been indicated in the past that the ordinance should wait for the Planning Consultant. B. MISCELLANEOUS: Commissioner Leonard asked whether ~rovision had been made for the Chairman and Vice-Chairman to attend the League of California Cities conference in San Francisco. The Chairman answered that the arrangements have been made. VI NEW BUSINESS: A. MISCELLANEOUS: Commissioner Frolich asked that the neighborhood plans be re- viewed by Mark Thomas Co., since they are now obsolete. He felt it would be a small enough expense for the ordinance and the data. The Chairman requested a resolution be sent to the City Manager requesting authority for the City Engineer to reVlse the neighbor- hood plans. COmmissioner Frolich requested, and other Commissioners con- curred, that their ordinance books be brought up to date. VII ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 P.M. ATTEST: APPROVED: -LsL~",!-:-_ª-~}-,-~,____.________.,. __ Chatr'\TI::U~_~ Pl¡"I)1n.~_1 :-.t~- Co:m\"¡J_<-:·:.~;.('r· is/ Lawrence K. Martin Ci ty Clerk