Loading...
PC 09-09-63 10321 S. SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE ROAD (City Hall) C I T Y 0 F CUP E R TIN 0 CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA 252-4505 MINUTES FOR T~Œ REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 9. 1963 TIME: PLACE: 8:00 P.M. Board Room, Cupertino Elementary School District 10300 Vista Drive, Cupertino I SALUTE TO THE FLAG II ROLL CALL: Commissioners Present: Adamo. Fitzgerald. Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frol1ch Commissioner Absent: Leonard Staff Preßent: Mr. Lahi, Mr. Shook MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETINGS: July 22, 1963 -- Comm. Small moved to receive and file the minutes of the Planning Commission for July 22. 1963. Comm. Fitzgerald seconded. Motion passed, 6-0. July 23, 1963 -- Comm. Snyder requested a correction on pages 1 and 2, to add the word "Neighborhood" in front of any number, for clarity. Comm. Snyder moved to approve the minutes of July 23, 1963, with corrections. Seconded by Comm. Small. Motion passed, 6-0. JUl~ 30, 1963 n Comm. Snyder stated the word "Commissioner" be change to "Chairman" in the first paragraph on page 1. On page 4, the 5th paragraph. the word "pull" should read "pool". Chairman Fro1ich indicated that on ~ge 3. paragraph 2, referring to the assess- ed valuation should read ":¡;4,000 per pupil below the state average." Comm. Fitzgerald moved the minutes for the July 30. 1963, meeting be approved with corrections. Comm. Small seconded. Motion passed. 6-0. August 12, 1963 -- Comm. Snyder moved to approve the minutes of August 12, 19b3. Comm. Rampy seconded. Motion passed, 6-0. August 15. 1963-~ 4, regarding the roofing than "per square foot". with corrections. Comm. Comm. Adamo stated that on page 1, paragraph materials, it should read "per square" rather Comm. Fitzgerald moved to approve the minutes Rampy seconded. Motion passed, 6-0. August 26, 1963 -- Comm. Fitzgerald pointed out that on page 3, paragraph ~, regarding Application 92-Z-63. he included the statement that this matter be referred to the City Engineer for a study of the traffic pattern before the second hearing. Chairman Frolich indicated that on page 2, Hearing C, discussing R24, he pointed out that at onl¥ one other meeting had this been discussed. (Ell 'Vee Construction Co.) Chairman Frolich also stated that on page 3, regarding the Craft Hear- ing, he questioned the street pattern, showing no access to the City on the tentative map in the R-3H area. Regarding the Vallco applica- tion on page 4, Mr. Anthony Lillo asked Mr. Patterson whether any commitments had been made. Mr. Patterson stated that none had been made and, further, none had been requested. Item F on the agenda, Assur¡¡,nce Finance. page 5, paragraph 4. add: "City Manager to check with the County Planning Dept." Item G, Excell application, page 5 Chairman Frolich wished to have it in the record that he agreed with the possibility of going all multiple on this property but did not go along with the "all commercial" thinking. Comm. Fitzgerald moved to approve the August 26, 1963, minutes with corrections. Comm. Adamo seconded. Motion passed, 6-0. -1- III COMMUNICAT~ùNS: A. Written: (1) ( 2) (3) (4) (5) Application for a tract number for Foothill #2, Monta Vista-Stevens Creek Road. Letter from the State regarding long-range recreation objectives and plans for California. Letter from County Planning Commission requesting rezon- ing Monta Vista to R12, Orange Avenue County Planning Commission agenda for 9/4/63 and minutes for August meetings. A copy of the joint County-San Jose East Side Master Plan. Comm. Snyder moved to have a letter written to the County Plan- ning Commission expressing our point in reference to the preliminary general plan. Comm. Fitzgerald seconded. Motion passed, 6-0. The City Attorney couldn't come to this meeting, due to illness, but did furnish the information that he felt the Planning Commission should not instruct the City Planners on how to change the general plan but rather to wait and give their views on it at the proper time. Comm. Fitzgerald moved the communications be received and filed. Comm. Small seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frolich None Comm. Leonard 6-0 B. Verbal communications None IV HEARINGS SCHEDULED A. BOGDANICH BUILDING CO.: Appl. 86-z-63 to rezone 8 acres from R-1:B-D to R-1j adjoining the south side of McClellan Road, east and west of Madrid Road. Second Hearing. (Annexation in progress.) Mr. Jim Cole, of MacKay and Somps, made the presentation. He stated that a plan has been submitted, but not a tentative map, at this time. The thinking at this point is to have two cuI de sacs but to still make use of Madrid Road. He stated that Toledo Road was abandoned because it was an old road, laid out with large lots in mind. Chairman Fro1ich stated that some thought should be given as to what the Commission wants to do with Rae Lane before the tentative map on this application comes up. Comm. Fitzgerald moved the second Hearing be closed. Comm. Small seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frolich None Comm. Leonard 6-0 Comm. Fitzgerald moved this application be approved as submitted subject to the 12 standard conditions. Comm. Snyder seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Fro1ich None Comm. Leonard 6-0 GEORGE YA~OKA: Appl. 89-z-63 A-2:B-4 to R-3-Hj on the south Blaney Avenue and Randy Lane. B. to rezone 7.85 acres from side of Lucille between Second Hearing. Mr. Sid Mitchell, Sunnyvale Civil Engineer, made the presenta- tion. He indicat€d that the Church on the adjoining property was not interested in putting in a joint road going out to Blaney as it would be impossible to put a 60' street here. He also stated that aU-shaped -2- internal street was impractical because of the resulting shallow lots. The total area concerned is 48,500 sq. ft., with 1400 sq. ft. per unit. At this point, Comm. Snyder suggested that Mr. Yamaoka is exceeding the net density allowed per acre. Mr. Shook stated that Mr. Yamaoka had met with the City Engineer- ing Dept., and it was agreed that this was a difficult parcel to work with. He suggested that perhaps cutting down on the lot size is the solution. Mr. Lahi indicated that Mr. Yamaoka had come into the office at 3 P.M. the day of this meeting and was told that, without sufficient time to study the plans, probably the best thing to do would be to have a U-shaped internal street with 50' width along the property line. He, therefore, made this recommendation. Comm. Fitzgerald moved the second Hearing be closed. Comm. Small seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzterald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frolich None . Comm. Leonard 6-0 Comm. Fitzgerald moved the application be approved, subject to the 12 standard conditions, with the suggested street pattern with the U-shaped street surrounding the property line. Comm. Adamo seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Comm. : Comm. Adamo, Fitzgerald Rampy, Small, Snyder, Fro1ich Leonard 2-4 Comm. Fitzgerald moved to deny the motion. Comm. Small seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Comm. : Comm. Rampy, Small, Snyder, Adamo, Fitzgerald Leonard Frolich 4-2 Chairman Frolich advised the applicant that he has the right of appeal to the City Council. Comm. Small added that it must be in writing and within five days. C. ELL VEE CONSTRUCTION CO.: App1. 91-2-63 to rezone 34 acres from A to R-24-H; bounded on the north by Stevens Creek Blvd, on the east by the lands of Foothill College, on the south by McClellan Rd and on the west by the Southern Pacific Rail- road. Second Hearing continued. (Annexation in progress) Mr. Ned Abrams gave a recap of the development of city planning since he received his Masters Degree in 1938. In essence, he chal- lenged the thinking of the City Planner, and backed up his statements by quoting Mr. Henry Churchill, reknown planner, in the Encyc10p~ªia Americana. More specifically, he said that the City Planner had stated in the Cupertino Courier that commercial development in the Monta Vista area may not take place for 15 - 20 years. Mr. Abrams pointed out that his clients were in their 60's and did not wish to wait that long be- fore developing their property. Mr. Abrams said he had approached the State in regard to trading their piece of land intended for a corporation yard for an equal por- tion in the northeast corner of subject property, and they seemed to go along with his thinking. This could provide a common access to this development and the corporation yard, directly across stevens Creek Blvd from Alhambra Avenue. The plan is to have 400 homes in the entire area, built approxi- mately 100 at a time. There will be a continuous park running through the property. There will be peripheral access, in addition to an internal road pattern. There will be a 50' street along the freeway instead of 60' because there is no reason for having a sidewalk on the freeway side. It is Mr. Abrams' understanding that the utilities are all available. -3- Comm. Snyder wished that Mr. Volker was present to rebutt some of Mr. Àbrams' statements regarding city planning. He also challenged Mr. Abrams ' statement that it is ridiculous to Con'sider neighboring areas in a master plan. Comm. Small didn't feel that it was feasible to put an industrial park in thiS area SinCe there would be over 400 home owners to deal with in order todève10p this area. Chairman Frolich's thinking was that the land values would go up and up and someone Wishing to develop an industrial area would seek one where the hOmes were old and not so expensive rather than one where there were, say, $50,000 homes. Comm. Snyder proposed to set up a study session to decide whether or not this parcel should go industrial or multiple. Comm. Rampy moved to close the second Hearing. Comm. Snyder seconded. AYES: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frolich NAYS: None ABSENT: Comm. Leonard 6-0 Comm. Snyder moved that the application be denied. Comm. Rampy seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Rampy, Snyder, Frolich Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Small Comm. Leonard 3-3 CbmriJ. Fitzgèrald moved the application be approved. Comm. Small Seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Small Comm.: Rampy, Snyder, Frolich Comm. Leonard 3-3 Comm. Fitzgerald moved to set up a study session for either September 19th or September 12th, and that the City Planner be request- ed to attend. Comm. Snyder seconded. Motion passed, 6-0. Comm. Small made a motion this application be continued at the next meeting. Comm. Fitzgerald seconded. AYES: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frolich NAYS: None ABSENT: Corom. Leonard 6-0 D. WILLIAM H. CRAFT, et a1: Appl. 92-Z-63 to rezone approxi- mately III acres from A-2:B-4 to PC-H; on the north side of Stevens Creek Blvd, east and west of Calabazas Creek. Second Hearing. Presentation was made by Attorney Boris Stanley. He briefly reviewed the tentative map. The Planning Commission had recommended the Craft and Vallco principles get together ~ith the City Engineer regarding the road pattern, which meeting took place on 9/5/63. Mr. Ants Lahi stated that Tantau must go through but a winding Tantau could be accomplished, adjacent to Calabazas Creek. The City Engineer indicated that Amherst and Tantau should form the skeleton for the road pattern. Amherst has been designated as a major city street (collector) and approved by the State. The City Attorney submitted a comment concerning both the Craft and Vallco applications: "I have reviewed these applications and see no problems. I would suggest that as a condition of rezoning that a street pattern be established at this time which is suitable to the City. " The Westwood Oaks people are not enthusiastic about multiples up against the property line here. -4- Comm. Small stated he would like to see the wholè parcel go merely as PC-H, rather than break it down further at this point. Chairman Fro1ich felt it was only fair to indicate to the applicant the feelings or the Comm1sa1onon the tentat1ve map. Comm. Snyder stated he would like to see the area west of Tantau and west of Ca1abazas Creek go light industrial, and professional of- fices on the other side of Tantau. Chairman Frolich asked Mr. Stanley what his feeling is of light industrial and R & D in the whole area, providing there is a market for it. Mr. Stanley answered that light industrial would include R & D but that R & D would not include light industrial. He also stated that the City Planner suggested eating and meeting places should be provided for the Industrial Park. Mr. Gary Gouvea, 349 La Herran Drive, Santa Clara, speaking for the City of Santa Clara Planning Dept., suggested it is important to get additional access roads. He agreed that Tantau development is quite important. He also felt there should be tight control as to the height of buildings. Mr. Stuart Leaf, 679 Meadow, Santa Clara (Westwood Oaks) would like to Bee the following things: (1) No 24-hour work at the Indus- trial Park, (2) Professional buildings or light industrial bordering Westwood Oaks, and (3) Planning of the entire Industrial Park as a unit rather than as separate parcels, to make sure that no concessions will be made to lure prospective lessees. Mr. Robert Michaelson, 10424 Norwich Avenue, (Idlewild Greens) wanted to know what the Craft family felt would be compatible with Idlewi1d Greens. Mr. Stanley stated thè Craft family had no specific information as to what is going to go into this area as yet. This will be controlled as the use permits are filed. Comm. Fitzgerald moved the second Hearing be closed. Comm. Small seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Fro1ich None Comm. Leonard 6-0 Comm. Fitzgerald moved that Application 92-Z-63 be approved with the addition of the statement that the Craft family has no objection to TantaU going through this development. Comm. Small seconded. Comm. Snyder amended the motion to add that Tantau must meet the approval of the City Engineer regarding its street pattern. Comm. Fitzgerald moved to include this in his motion. Comm. Small seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frolich None Comm. Leonard 6-0 E.VALLCO PARK, a corporation: Appl. 94-z-63 to rezone 275 acres from A, M-l and A-2:B-4 toPC-H; between Homestead Road and Stevens Creek Blvd east and west of proposed Wolfe Rd. Second Hearing. Mr. William Watson, Architect, started the presentation by stat- ing that Tantau would be very important to the development of the entire area. The main function will be to eliminate traffic from going through ¡'lestwood Oaks. The quality of VaIJco Industrial Park will be as good as and better than that at Stanford Industrial Park. Mr.John Blayney went on to explain the proposed traffic pattern. Wolfe Rd would extend from stevens Creek to IIDmestead; Prlineridge would go through from Westwood Oaks to Wolfe Rd; Tantau would extend through Stevens Creek to Homestead; and Varian plans to have the front of its establishment on Homestead. Val1co plans to lease sites rather than sell them. In every case, the landscape and yard requirements will exceed the requirements, except as will be suggested later. Va1lco proposes a 6-8 foot fence or wall on the property line along Westwood Oaks and Idle~tl1d Greens. Bordering this will be a 20' landscaped area. The nearest industrial building will be 100' minimum from the property line. Height would be regulated by a gradient of 1 to 4; ,:r:::_ e.g., a building 100' from the property line could only be 25' high, etc. Variation from M-l requirements are requested in 2 respects, how- ever. Where the maximum height is now 35', Mr.Blayney proposes 42' since this is necessary for a two-story building. The buffering zone is the other problem. If a street can constitute a portion of this buffer, Val1co would like to have 20' of landscaped area, followed by a parking area in the next 80'. Chairman F'rolich aSked at this point whether Vallco wanted a commitment or an expression from the Planning Commission. Mr. Watson stated they would like a commitment. At this point, Mr. Patterson stated the City Manager has the problem and Varian will be guided by his opinion. Chairman Frolich felt the requests were reasonable and he tends to go along with them. Comm. Snyder stated that, after contemplating about 100' of landscaping, he felt it just did not sound reasonable. Comm. Fitzgerald had no objection to the height variation, and could foresee no reasonable objection to the contemplated parking plan. Comm. Rampy, Small, and Adamo had no objections to these two varia tions. Mr. Stuart B. Leaf, 679 Meadow Ave., Santa Clara, asked what would happen on the Marchese property. Comm. Fitzgerald stated that if the road is being developed he would either go along with it or we would have to build around it. Mr. Robert Michaelson, of Id1ewi1d subdivision, wondered about the feasibility of putting a row of R1 homes along the border instead of the 20' landscaping and 80' parking. He felt these homes would be desirable for people without children, say possibly, some of the executives working in Vallco Industrial Park. The general feeling of the Commission is that this would not be the answer. In regard to access roads, MrJ3Iayney pointed out that Amherst and/or Merritt are not critical to the Industrial Park. Mr. Dean Slceels, 2141 Columbus, representing the Trinity Metho- dist Church, asked how the Agreement between Cupertino and Santa Clara would affect the Church property at the northeast corner of the Vallco property. Mr. Blaney stated that he expected the setbacks and buffer- ing would be as described for the other areas. Mr. Thomas Thornton, 1790 Lark Lane, Sunnyvale, protested the manner of publication of this Hearing. He also stated he was in favor of putting only R-1 in the entire area of the Craft and Val1co appli- cations. Mr. David Malone, 10212 Dennison Ave., Cupertino; Mr. Don Paul, 10198 Dennison Ave., Cupertino; and Mr. Michael Hernon, 1788 Lark Lane, Sunnyvale, all protested use of a parking lot as part of the buffer. Mr. Charles Rogers, 715 Nicholson, Santa Clara and Mr. A. D. Epperson, 1785 Linnet Lane, Cupertino, all protested the commercial zoning in the Vallco property. Regarding the landscaping, Mr.Blayney stated he favored putting in the shrubs and trees very soon so they will be quite large at such time as this area is developed. Mr. Charles Rogers stated that he would go along with profession- al zoning of the area shown as commercial, but not with commercial. Comm. Small moved the Secondd Hearing be closed. Comm. Fitz- gerald seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Fro1ich None Comm. Leonard 6-0 -6- Comm. Small mad~ the motion that: Whereas the proponents of this Application have submitted a broad and comprehensive plan that has been well thought out and intelligently presented; and . Whereas the Vallco plan presents an opportun~ty to the C~ty or CUper- tino that is a great and. momentous step forward for the City of CUpertino; and Whereas long range objectives have been presented; and Whereas a comprehensive traffic circulation plan has been submitted; and Whereas the PC-H Ordinance offers maximum protection for the City and residents of the City of Cupertino, Now, therefore, be it resolved that this Commission recommend to the City Council that Applica.tion 94-2-63 be approved, subject to conditions of PC-H Ordinance. The Commission further recommends that the two suggestions pertaining to height change and buffering be considered by the Council. Comm. Fitzgerald seconded the motion. Comm. Snyder amended this motion as follows: 1. That the streets of Merritt and Amherst dead end at the Valico development. AYES:Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frolich NA YS: None ABSENT: Comm. Leonard 6-0 2. That previous agreements between the City of CUpertino and City of Santa Clara regarding streets opening into the Va11co develop- ment be preserved. AYES: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, S~al1, Snyder, Fro1ich NAYS: None ABSENT: Comm. Leonard 6-0 3. That buffering (planted) be provided as proposed along Linnet Ln. AYES: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frolich NAYS: None ABSENT: Comm. Leonard 6-0 Voting on. the entire motion and amendments as follows: AYES: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Fro1ich NAYS: None ABSENT: Comm. Leonard. 6-0 F. DONALD A. EXCE~: Appl. 85-z-63 to rezone approximately 11.037 acres from A-2:B-4 to P-O-H (2.287 acres) and R-24-H (8.75 acres); on the west side of Highway 9, 450' south of Homestead Rd. First Hearing. Tentative map. 4 lots. Appl. 25-TM-63) Mr. Gene.flIastin made the presentatton. 'rho èl.eve10pment would include 144 units -- all two-bedroom @ 1000 sq. ft. þc>:, nnit, anù Q parking ratio of better than 2:1. Mr. Excel1 is ready to start con- struction as soon as the application is approved. He pointed out that 450 units are going up behind his property now. Comm. Rampy felt there was a problem regarding the approach to the freeway. Comm. Adamo felt all the carports along the property line was not desirable. Comm. Fitzgerald moved to close the first Hearing. Comm. Small seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Fro1ich None Comm. Leonard 6-0 -7- ':.\ Comm. Fitzgerald proposed the developer get together with the City Engineer to work out a road pattern. Comm. Small 1 seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Fro1ich None Comm. Leonard. 6-0 G. LOUIS A. PAGANINI: Appl. 80-z-63 to rezone 22 acres from R-l:B-2 to R-24-H (15 acres) and P-O-H (7 acres); approxi- mately 500' south of Stevens Creek Blvd, opposite Portal. Second Hearing. Comm. Small abstained from this Hearing. Mr. John Parsley, 3359 Lynn OaltS Drive, Cupertino, presented a revised map showing 198 units, as opposed to the' 390 previously planned. Chairman Frolich and Comm. Fitzgerald both felt there would be problems as to access to the property. Left turns on Stevens Creek would be prohibited by the center island when ultimately developed. Comm. Adamo questioned what Mr. Parsley planned to do with Price Avenue. Mr. Parsley stated he would improve Price Avenue if the owners would dedicate the land. Comm. Snyder pointed out that in addition to the traffic prob- lems, the elementary school in this area would be completely surrounded by multiple. He was also concerned about the quantity of multiple applications being received by the Planning Commission. Comm. Rampy felt there was just too much being planned for this parcel and that there would be problems. Chairman Frolich stated that if this land is going to be re- zoned commercial it should be now. Mr. Nick Kuhn, 10225 Richwood Drive, Cupertino, felt the condi- minium concept is new and he doubts whether people with large families will be interested in buying here because of resale value. Mr. Gary Stokes, 10199 Richwood Drive, Cupertino, objected to two-story units. Mr. David Hill, 10461 Davison Avenue, Cupertino, stated that Rosseau has solved the drainage problem in that area and wondered if Mr. Parsley would care to do anything about the badly-needed park. Mr. Parsley stated he would not give 2 acres of this parcel for a park. Mr. Parsley then presented a petition of Idlewild home owners who back his development plan. Comm. Snyder moved to close the second hearing. Comm. Adamo seconded. AYES: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Rampy, Snyder, Frolich NA YS: None ABSENT: Comm. Leonard ABSTAINED: Comm. Small 5-0 Comm. Snyder made a motion that: Whereas the applicant has presented essentially the same application which was denied by the Planning Commission approximately two years ago; and Whereas the applicant has not presented a solution to the potential traffic problems on Price, Viclcsburg and Portal Avenues; and Whereas the applicant has not convinced the Planning Commission that these potential traffic problems are not forthcoming; and Whereas the application does not appear to be advantageous to the property and improvements in the zoning district and neighborhood in which the property is located; Now, therefore, let it be resolved that the Planning Commission re- commend denial of Application 80-z-63 to rezone 22 acres from R-1: B-2 to R24-H and P-O-H. Cl'.a,irman Frolich seconded. -8- AYES: Comm.:' Rampy,Snyder, Frolich' NAYS: Comm.: Adamo, Fitzgerald ABSENT: Comm. Leonard ABSTA!NED: Comm. Small 3-2 H. STEVENS CREEK GARDEN CENTER: Appl. 27-U-63 for a Use Permit for 2 acres. Property zoned C-1-H. Use Permit sought to allow retailing small amounts of mixed concrete; south side of Stevens Creek Blvd, west side of Calabazas Creek. Mr. Thomas Bendik explained that there is a new innovation for the do-it-yourself home owner. Small amounts of cement is mixed at the Garden Center and hauled by the buyer in small trailers. Comm. Small questioned whether or not the rock bins could be moved to the rear of the Center. ' Mr. Quinn, Castro Valley, protested this application, stating that he felt that granting this Use Permit would penalize the people who follow the rules set forth by the Planning Commission and gives unfair advantage to those who do not. Comm. Adamo made the motion that the appl1catiö'n be granted on a three-year basis. Comm. Small seconded. Comm. Snyder amended this motion that only one cement mixer be used and that it be identical to the one now in use. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Adamo, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frolich Comm. Fitzgerald Comm. Leonard 5-1 Comm. Snyder amended the motion that the cement trailers be properly stored away so they are not visible from the street. Comm. Small seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Comm. Comm. Adamo, Rampy, Fitzgerald Leonard Small, Snyder, Frollch: 5-1 Comm. Snyder amended the motion so that the rocle bins now located in the front of the establishment be moved to the rear within 6 months. Comm. Small seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Comm. Comm. Adamo, Rampy, Fi tzgera1d Leonard Small, Snyder, Frolich 5-1 Comm. Snyder amended this motion to read "2 years" instead of "3 years". Comm. Small seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm. : Comm. Comm. Adamo, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Fro1ich Fitzgerald Leonard 5-1 Comm. Snyder amended the motion to include planting along west lot lines within 3 months, subject to the approval of H-Control. Comm. ~'T'.all seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Comm. Comm. Adamo, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frolich Fitzgerald Leonard 5-1 Voting on the entire motion, with amendments, as follows: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm. : Comm. Comm. Adamo, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frolich Fitzgerald Leonard 5-1 -9- I. THE VALLEY GREEN COMPANY: Appl. 37-V-b3 for a Variance to the Subdivision Ordinance to allow monolithic sidewalks where ordinance requires standard separated sidewalks; west side of Stelling Rd, south of Junipera Serra Freeway. Mr. John Griffin requested permission to put the sidewalks against the curbs rather than include a parkway. He would also put in the prescribed trees. Comm. Snyder made the motion this variance be granted, but that this is a prototype, strictly on an experimental basis. Comm. Small seconded. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Comm.: Adamo, ¿itzgerald, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frolich None Comm. Leonard 6-0 V UNFINISHED BUSINESS None VI NEW BUSINESS None VII ADJOURNMENT Comm. Small moved to adjourn. Comm. Fitzgerald seconded. Motion carried, 6-0 Meeting adjourned at 1:30 A.M. APPROVED: /s/ Donald Frolich Chairman ATTEST: -10-