P&R 02-03-05
CUPEIQ1NO
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
Thursday, February 3, 2005, 7 p.m.
Community Hall Council Chambers
10350 Torre Avenue
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. SELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR 2005
A. Chair
B. Vice Chair
5. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
A. Regular meeting of January 6,2005
6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the commission on any
matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes a person. In most cases, state
law will prohibit the commission trom making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on
the agenda.
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Stevens Creek Corridor Park - Review the traffic engineer's recommendation for the
amount of parking needed to serve the proposed park and progranuning
B. Stevens Creek Corridor Park - Review of prior trail alignment recommendations
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Annual report trom the Cupertino Tennis Club - Grant Gower, CTC
9. MISCELLANEOUS - NO ACTION REQUIRED
A. Written communications
B. Staff oral reports
a. Senior Center Programs - Teresa Mo, Recreation Coordinator
C. Community contacts
10. ADJOURNMENT - Joint meeting with the City Council on Monday, March 7, 7 p.m.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the city of Cupertino
will make reasonable efforts to accommodate persons with qualified disabilities. If you
require special assistance, please contact the Parks and Recreation office at 777-3 I IO
at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.
DRAFT
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
CiTY OF CUPERTINO
REGULAR MEETING
THURSDAY, JANUARY 6, 2005
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Brown called the regular meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission to
order at 7 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Commissioners present:
Commissioners absent:
Staff present:
Jeanne Bradford, Roger Peng, Rod Brown, Frank Jelinch,
Cary Chien
None
Therese Ambrosi Smith, Director; Mike O'Dowd,
Supervisor, Blackberry Farm; Barbara Banfield, Naturalist,
McClellan Ranch; Marie Miller, Administrative Assistant;
Ciddy Wordell, City Planner, Planning Department
I. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING - Regular adjourned meeting of
December 7, 2004
ACTION:
The minutes of December 7, 2004, were unanimously approved as
written.
2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Robert Levy, Wilkinson Avenue, welcomed the Commission on their first
meeting in the new Community Hall.
3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. General Plan - Recommendation to the Planning Commission and City
Council
Director Smith gave a PowerPoint presentation providing a brief history of the
General Plan and outlined the City's park acreage policy and the existing park
acreage. She reported that there are areas in the City that are deficient for park
acreage, but that policies have been written to encourage the provision of open
space in three locations: Villa Serra, Vallco, and a linear park in the Rancho
Rinconada area. In the draft General Plan, there are policies that deal with use of
parkland and the distribution of intensive community use.
Parks and Recreation Commission
January 6, 2005
Page 2 of7
The public hearing process begins with an initial Planning Commission meeting
on January 11,2005. The Planning Commission has asked that the Parks and
Recreation Commission give the draft one final look to determine if any changes
are needed. They have invited the Commission to attend their February 8 meeting
to give input. Director Smith reported that at this time staff had no
recommendations for additional changes to the draft beyond what had already
been included.
Chairman Brown asked if language had been included in the draft to support the
development of smaller parks. Ms. Wordell stated that she believes it has already
been incorporated into the draft.
Commissioner Bradford asked if there were particular concerns expressed by the
Planning Commission that would be addressed on February 8 and what would be
accomplished at that meeting. Ms. Wordell stated that the Planning Commission
did not address a particular problem; they were meeting with other commissions,
and it was suggested that the Parks and Recreation Commission also be invited.
She believes that the purpose of the Commission being invited to the February 8
meeting is to be a resource to the Planning Commission when they discuss the
park element of the draft.
Commissioner Peng asked why the Council did not endorse the General Plan Task
Force recommendations. Director Smith answered that she believes that City
Council added the public input process so that all of the ideas would have an
opportunity to be heard by the public.
Director Smith stated that it would not be necessary for all of the Parks and
Recreation Commissioners to attend the February 8 meeting and that she and one
commissioner could attend. Ms. Wordell agreed.
Public Comments
Robert Levy, Wilkinson Avenue, believes that the commissions, City Council and
staff are being delinquent in putting together the General Plan. He would like to
see a plan using park fees to develop parks in deficient areas. He believes there
should be consideration of the people who are going to be buying homes in these
developments.
Deborah Jamison, Rumford Drive, presented historical background on the use of
the Simms property as a part of the McClellan Ranch parkland. She believes it
should be included in the acreage count for the City's parkland.
Parks and Recreation Commission
January 6, 2005
Page 3 of7
Commissioner Comments
Chairman Brown asked if a motion was being requested. Ms. Wordell that she
was looking for any changes to the draft General Plan in a form of a
recommendation and also if they would be attending the February 8 meeting.
Chairman Brown stated that there would be a representative from the Parks and
Recreation Commission attending the meeting.
Commissioner Chien asked if there were fees when a developer builds a park
within their own development. Director Smith pointed out that Policy 2-77,
Acquisition or Dedication of Additional Parklands, covers this issue. She also
stated that the Planning Department diligently pursues the needed park acreage to
keep the 3 acres per 1,000 population in balance.
Commissioner Chien asked Director Smith to discuss the difficulties of acquiring
land for parks. She provided an example of a two-acre parcel the San J ose Water
Company owns along Lawrence Expressway that the City is interested in
developing as parkland for the Rancho Rinconada area. At this point, the
company says they need the land. In order for the City to purchase it, San Jose
Water Company would need to decide that they want to surplus the land. When
and if this land ever gets surplused, it could be offered to a public agency such as
Cupertino, get annexed (land is currently in San Jose), and then the City would
begin working on the park's development. Director Smith stated that it is
important that land acquisitions are proposed in the General Plan so that when and
if the City is ready is acquire the land, the acquisition is consistent with the City's
long-term plan.
Commissioner Jelinch commented that he didn't know if it was really necessary
for the Commission to take a vote ifthey are not going to recommend any
changes. His position is that when they studied the issue two years ago, they
carefully adopted policies and he does not see any need for further changes.
Chairman Brown asked for a preference from staff on whether to take a vote.
Director Smith said that a vote was not necessary.
B. Review of proposed park programming - Stevens Creek Corridor Park
Director Smith reported that the Stevens Creek Corridor Park proj ect is moving
forward in three ways: environmental analysis/park planning, planning for future
programming, and fundraising. She discussed that the preferred conceptual plan
needs further refinement: define limits of restoration, define the trail alignment,
and insure adequate access, parking, and circulation. The biggest decision yet to
be made involves the alignment of the Stevens Creek Trail, and this decision
should be made in light of the activities that are being planned for the Corridor.
Parks and Recreation Commission
January 6, 2005
Page 4 of7
Critical to evaluating access and parking requirements is an estimate of use at
locations throughout the park. She reported that a traffic engineer would be
attending the February 3 meeting to discuss the proposed park circulation and the
trail. All feedback received at this February 3 meeting will be forwarded to the
traffic consultant.
Director Smith requested that the Commission ask City Council to schedule a
special joint meeting with the Parks and Recreation Commission at their January
18 meeting to discuss the year Blackberry Farm should close, the environmental
classroom CIP, and the trail alignment issues. Smith reported that she is planning
to discuss park circulation and the trail alignment at the Commission's February 3
meeting. In March, it is planned that the Parks and Recreation Commission will
make a recommendation to City Council regarding trail alignment. At a later
meeting (possibly March 15), Council will consider the trail alignment
recommendation. Director Smith answered clarifying questions.
Public Comments
Robert Levy, Wilkinson Avenue, gave his concerns about the potential of
increased traffic on Byrne Avenue, Stevens Creek, and McClellan Road
throughout the year. He believes that there will not be adequate parking at
Stevens Creek Boulevard and there may be an issue about access safety.
Deborah Jamison, Rumford Drive, is concerned that the Stevens Creek parking lot
and, to a lesser degree, the McClellan Ranch parking lot will become major
access points for mountain bikers. The county parking lots currently cost $5 to
use and she sees bicyclists using the McClellan Ranch and Stevens Creek parking
lots to avoid paying the county fee. She does not support expanding the parking
lots. She believes the current Stevens Creek parking lot can be redesigned to
accommodate more parking. She does not support a bicyclist-through trail.
When programming is developed, she would like to see programming with habitat
protection of McClellan Ranch in mind. She distributed prepared notes entitled
"Traffic Generation and Access Points", which will be added as an exhibit to the
packet.
Janet Van Zoeren, Milky Way, supports the comments of Deborah Jamison. She
does not support a multipurpose trail through the Stevens Creek Corridor. She
would like to see McClellan Ranch Park as a destination and not just a "drive-
through" area. She would like to see that the trail be set up in such a way that the
bicyclist portion of it stops before it gets into McClellan Ranch and Simms
property, and that there be bicyclists racks in place for people to use as they visit
the preserve.
Lonnie T oensfeldt, Fitzgerald Drive, talked about her 30 years of involvement at
McClellan Ranch and with its master plan development. She does not see any
Parks and Recreation Commission
January 6, 2005
Page 5 of7
reference to the McClellan Ranch Master Plan, which bothers her. She stated that
the Simms property was included in the master plan, which the City Council
accepted and endorsed. She is concerned about the trail going through McClellan
Ranch and believes it will destroy the ambience and uniqueness ofthe property.
Chairman Brown clarified that the master plan has been a part of prior discussions
as it relates to the Stevens Creek Corridor Park.
Craig Breon, McClellan Road, Executive Director for the Santa Clara Valley
Audubon Society, acknowledged the balancing act the City faces as it
accommodates different types of users for the parkland. The Audubon Society
has some concerns about the impacts of improvements, such as the environmental
building, will have on the environment. They understand that there will be some
amount of impacts because the changes, which are by and large very good, will
bring a change to the surroundings to the park and the wildlife. A believes a bus
turnaround will be needed in the area. He does not support expanding the
McClellan Ranch parking lot. When increasing the education programming,
considerations of the surroundings will need to be taken into account. The
Audubon board has strong feelings about the trail as currently presented.
Aaron Grossman, McClellan Road, works part-time at McClellan Ranch, supports
a multi·purpose trail through McClellan Ranch. He believes the concerns are
overstated. He believes the park plan should be designed to encourage bicycling
over car usage. He believes a trail can be environmentally designed.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Bradford asked if additional parking had been designed on Stevens
Creek Boulevard. Director Smith answered that expanding the lot had been
investigated, but with the Center for Living History, the parking demands need to
be re-looked at. Currently, the City is talking with a traffic engineer about
incorporating bus traffic. Bus drop-off points will need to be added at each of the
three accesses to spread the load out. Commissioner Bradford believes that part
of the Commission's recommendation to significantly reduce the picnicking area
was an attempt to mitigate neighborhood traffic concerns. Using the project
programming statistics offered in the presentation, Commissioner Bradford
calculated that even with year-round programming, there is an expected 30
percent reduction in traffic. She stated that she understands the concerns about
McClellan Ranch. She stated that at this point, she is very interested in hearing
from the traffic engineer; CEQA reports will dictate parking requirements as well.
Commissioner Peng likes the idea of using a shuttle bus from Monta Vista High
School to different access points. He supports the idea of a bicycle path in the
periphery of McClellan Ranch.
Parks and Recreation Commission
January 6, 2005
Page 6 of7
Commissioner Jelinch stated that he appreciates all the groundwork that has been
done and that the study is informative. He believes that the traffic study will make
a big difference in developing programming. He is sensitive to the Stevens Creek
Corridor environment, and recognizes the work that it will take to do this while
enhancing the park and providing adequate access to the park.
Commissioner Chien said he is also looking forward to the traffic engineer's
report. He would like to see the engineer put the report in layman's terms for ease
of understanding. He would like to see the engineer also talk about mitigation
measures. He invited residents and staff to join him on a walk of McClellan
Ranch on Friday, January 7, at I p.m.
Chairman Brown said he is looking forward to the traffic engineer's report too.
Director Smith reported that the traffic engineer, Mike Waller, has started to
investigate the area. He will bring a report in February to the Commission.
Commissioner Bradford asked for alternatives based on pavement needs for
various programs. Director Smith said another factor to be considered will be
those activities that are being retained for revenue generation purposes.
4. MISCELLANEOUS - NO ACTION REQUIRED
A. Written Communications - none
B. Staff Updates:
a. Plans are progressing for the 4th of July. There have been discussions
about making this year a bit more special due to the City celebrating
its 50th year possibly with a community birthday cake at Creekside,
and a town photo; there will be more information at the next meeting.
b. Santa Clara Valley Water District and the Audubon Society have
signed on to assist with a restoration grant application that is being
jointly written with the City. This grant request will be submitted to
the Department of Water Resources on January 25,2005. We are
applying for funding to match the Water District's commitment of 50
percent that they are underwriting for the removal of the barriers to
fish passage in Stevens Creek. There are three low-flow crossings and
a diversion dam.
c. City Council approved the fee waiver for the A YSO VIP soccer
program for special needs youth.
d. The City is working with the California Cricket Academy on coming
up with a design for a cricket pitch within the Library Field. They have
decided not to do a concrete pitch and are looking at a rammed-earth
pitch. They are hoping to raise funds to make that happen for the
upcoming cricket season.
Parks and Recreation Commission
January 6, 2005
Page 7 of7
e. Tennis court resurfacing has been completed at the Sports Center.
Kudos to Bob Rizzo and Don McCarthy for completing the project on
time and $100,000 under budget.
C. Commissioner contacts:
a. Commissioner Jelinch announced the California Association of Parks
and Recreation Commissioners and Board Members is having a
training session in Milpitas in February.
b. Commissioner Chien mentioned that the Post Office would issue 12
new stamps honoring the Chinese Lunar New Year on Saturday,
January 8. The stamps will have Cupertino and Monta Vista post
station cancellations. Another event on Saturday, January 8, at the
Community Hall, is a town hall meeting being held by
Assemblywoman Sally Lieberman.
5. ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Brown adjourned the meeting at 8:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Marie Miller, Administrative Assistant
Minutes approved at the
, 2005, meeting.
1':0. I
/t~~
I F
CUPEIQ1NO
PARKS AND RECREATION ADMINISTRA nON
DIRECTOR'S REPORT TO THE
CUPERTINO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Agenda Date: February 3, 2005
Item 7.A.: Stevens Creek Corridor Park - Traffic Studv:
Hexagon Transportation has prepared a parking demand analysis for existing and proposed activities
at Stevens Creek Corridor Park:
· To assess the change in traffic resulting from the proposed park program, and
· To ensure that adequate parking and circulation is provided within the park
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), we are required to document the
environmental impacts of the proposed project, both positive and negative.
Currently, there are three parking areas within the Corridor. These parking areas provide a total of
1,222 parking spaces, and include:
· Parking along Stevens Creek Boulevard (91 parking spaces primarily serving the Blackberry
Farm Golf Course and Blue Pheasant Restaurant)
· Central parking area (1,100 festival style parking spaces primarily serving the Blackberry
Farm Picnic Grounds)
· The McClellan Ranch parking lots (31 parking spaces both paved and unpaved in McClellan
Ranch Park)
Hexagon calculated the parking demand for weekday and peak-hour time periods based on
participant numbers submitted by Mike O'Dowd. The time of day was taken into consideration. This
information provided the basis for evaluating the change in parking demand based on planned future
activities for the Corridor.
Analysis Of Existing Parking Demand
Stevens Creek Boulevard - Hexagon's analysis of parking demand, at the Stevens Creek Boulevard
lot, shows that on an average weekday during August, the peak parking demand is approximately 95
spaces. On an average Saturday, the parking demand is estimated at 88 spaces. This suggests that
the existing parking area is not quite large enough to adequately serve existing uses.
A question arose regarding the amount of parking needed for Blue Pheasant patrons. Hexagon
researched the typical trip rates and parking needs for similar sized restaurants, and determined that
44 more spaces should be added to serve the Blue Pheasant.
Printed on Recycled Paper
Director's Report to Parks and Recreation Commission
February 3, 2005
Page 2 of3
Blackberry Farm - The analysis of the current parking demand at the Blackberry Farm Picnic
Grounds shows a need for approximately 1,000 parking spaces during peak weekend events. Two or
three times a year, corporate events (drawing 4,000 participants) are held at Blackberry Farm.
During these events, participants are shuttled from Monta Vista High School.
McClellan Ranch Park -McClellan Ranch Park is most active on weekdays. Hexagon's analysis
suggests that the number of existing parking spaces adequately serves weekday and weekend use.
The parking supply is also adequate to serve the demand associated with Saturday use. For larger
events at McClellan Ranch, cars are parked at the Simms property or participants are shuttled from
Monta Vista High School
Table I below summarizes the comparison of the existing parking demand versus existing parking
supply at each of the three major parking areas serving Stevens Creek Corridor activity sites.
Table 1: Summary of Existin!! Parkin!! Demand and Supply
Parking Areas Existing Weekday Supply Saturday Supply
Parking Parking Minus Parking Minus
Spaces Demand Demand Demand Demand
Stevens Creek Blvd. 91 95 -4 88 3
Blackberry Farm 1,100 79 1,021 1,002 98
McClellan Ranch Park 31 II 20 3 28
TOTALS 1,222 185 1,037 1,093 129
Projected Parking Demand
Mike O'Dowd provided Hexagon Transportation with the outline for proposed programming with
estimated participant numbers that you reviewed at your last meeting (see attached). The parking
demand for the northern parking area is projected to increase by 13 to 26 percent. A peak demand
for approximately III parking spaces is projected for the Stevens Creek Boulevard lot. There is a
discrepancy between the amount of parking recommended for a restaurant the size of the Blue
Pheasant and what the manager reports the patron load to be. Based on reported patronage, the
number of parking spaces needed for the Blue Pheasant is 39. Based on the traffic engineer's
estimate, 83 spaces are needed. The attached Exhibit entitled, "Stevens Creek Corridor Proposed
Parking Layout", reflects a parking layout that should provide additional parking beyond what the
traffic engineer has determined is needed.
The parking demand at the Blackberry Farm area will be significantly reduced by the proposed
change in park operation. The new program proposed (including recreational swimming, trail use,
picnicking, day camps and swim lessons) would generate less parking demand than the current
summer demand. The most significant operational change will be the reduction in the number of
participants involved with picnicking. The peak picnicking use will be 500 down from 4,000
patrons. The park will go to year round operation, however. Hexagon projects that the additional
parking demand associated with peak use at Blackberry Farm under the proposed plan will be
adequately served by 200 spaces.
Director's Report to Parks and Recreation Commission
February 3,2005
Page 3 of3
A trail access point and an anticipated increase in the number of participants in nature programs will
affect the projected parking demand at McClellan Ranch Park. Peak parking demand for summer
weekdays will be about 18 parking spaces; on Saturdays, the demand will be approximately five
spaces more.
Table 2 below summarizes the comparison of the project parking demand versus existing parking
supply at each of the three major parking areas serving the Corridor activity sites.
Table 2: Summary ofPro'ected Parkin Demand and SUDDIv
Parking Areas Existing Weekday Supply Saturday Supply
Parking Parking Minus Parking Minus
Spaces Demand Demand Demand Demand
Stevens Creek Blvd. 91 107 -16 III -20
Blackberry Farm 1,100 1I5 985 105(a) 995
McClellan Ranch Park 31 18 13 5 26
TOTALS 1,222 240 982 221 1,001
(a) Saturday peak event involving -500 participants.
The attached "Stevens Creek Corridor Proposed Parking Layout" shows how parking can be
accommodated to meet the proposed park use.
7.B.: Stevens Creek Corridor Park - Review of Drior trail alienment recommendations
Jana Sokale will be reviewing the findings of the feasibility study and discussing the trail with
respect to Stevens Creek Corridor Park parking circulation and creek restoration concepts.
Please Note: You are scheduled for ajoint meeting with the City Council on Monday, March 7, 7
p.m. The purpose of the meeting will be to review:
· Trail alignment information and prior recommendations
· Blackberry Farm financial information - present and future
· Consider the date for Blackberry Farm closure and commencing restoration/construction.
The meeting will be for information only - no action will be taken.
Submitted by:
---Y¡tj~
Theresl A~brosi Smith, Director
Parks and Recreation Administration
_,.n"._,.,_... ...." ¡ _ __ _,,_.._.__" _ '___'__"_'_..n_",.n.,"___,.,_,,_ "" _n.n._.n" --""."..-, '--'- ~--~--..__... --~-~---_._. "~ ................. ..
Stevens Creek Corridor
1--. DB AFT
Annual Participants - Monthly Breakdown
r· _.
Access Point
Stevens Creek Blvd. ProQram Jan. Feb March April Mav June Julv AUQ Sept Oct Nov Dec TOTAL
Golf Course 3200 3400 5300 6000 6700 7000 7100 7300 6000 5300 4100 2600 64,000
Restaurant 4200 4300 4500 4800 5800 6400 6600 6600 6000 4800 4200 4200 62,400
Trail 500 600 700 900 900 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 10,000
U\ing History Center 900 900 900 900 900 950 950 950 900 900 900 900 10,950
Other 75 75 80 90 90 90 90 90 90 80 75 75 1,000
San Fernando Ave.
Picnicking 100 250 300 800 4,000 7,600 7,600 7,600 3,500 500 200 100 32.550
Rec Swim 0 0 0 600 3,000 3,400 3,400 3,400 2,000 475 0 0 16.275
Trail 500 600 700 900 900 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 10.000
Community Events 0 0 0 500 500 500 500 500 500 0 0 0 3,000
Other 75 75 80 90 90 90 90 90 90 80 75 75 1,000
Mc~lellan Road
Nature Educational programs 500 600 600 600 400 300 300 300 500 600 600 100 5,400
Trail 500 600 700 900 900 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 10,000
Santa Clara Valley Audubon 200 300 300 300 300 400 400 400 400 250 200 200 3,650
Community Gardens 300 300 500 600 600 600 600 600 500 460 200 200 5,460
Rolling Hills 4 - H 120 200 400 400 400 300 300 200 200 200 100 100 2,920
Nature After School Classes 50 50 50 50 50 50 0 0 50 50 50 50 500
Other 50 100 100 150 250 250 250 250 250 200 100 50 2,000
DRAFT
--.-- -- --r-
Alternative Program ! I
Program Jan. Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TOTAL
San Fernando Ave. Swimming Lessons 0 0 0 0 0 200 400 200 0 0 0 0 800
Camp Programs 0 0 0 0 0 40 80 40 0 0 0 0 160
McClellan Road Nature Educational Preschoc 40 40 40 40 40 0 0 0 40 40 40 40 360
-1
jJAAFl-
Stevens Creek Corridor
Annua Participant Est
--,-~
Number of
Vehicles
42,666
64,000/1.5 = 42,666
41,600
62,400/1.5 = 41,600
5,000
10,000/ .5 = 5,000
5,475
10,950/.5= 5.475
500
1.000/ .5 = 500
Number of
Participants
64,000
annually
62,400
200 x 312 days = 62,400
10,000
27 day x 365 days = 10,000
10,950
30 visitors x 365 day = 10,950
1.000
mates
Access Point Program
Stevens Creek Blvd.IGolf Course
Restaurant
Living~ History Center
Other
Trai
10,850
a\oerage 3 per car
5,425
aVE!rage 3 per car
5,000
10.000/ .5 = 5,000
750
3.000/ .25 = 750
500
1.000/ .5 = 500
32,550
annually
16,275
annually
10,000
27 day x 365 days = 10,000
3,000
6 e""nts x 500 = 3.000
1,000
Picnicking
Communit~ E""nts
Other
Ree Swim
Trai
San Fernando Ave
1,080
5,400~1.080
5,000
10,000 / ~5 = 5.000
3,650
10 cars per day = 3,650
5,475
15 cars per day x 365 = 5,475
2,920
8 cars per day x 365 = 2,920
500
per participant
1,000
2.000/ .5 = 1
000
5,400
aññUãITy
10,000
27 day x 365 = 10,000
500
'visitors and employees
120
plots + helpers
60
members
500
annually
2,000
photographers & eainters
Nature Educational Programs
Trail
Santa Clara Valley Audubon
Community Gardens
Rolling Hills 4-H
Nature Aller School Classes
Other
McClellan Road
DRAFT
Number of
Number of
Participants
Alternative Programs
Access Point Program
Vehicles
Swimming Lessons
San Fernando Ave.
8,000
200 cars x 40 days = 8,000
3,200
80 cars x 40 days = 3,200
2 wk sessions
160
40 participants x 4 - 2 wk sessions
800
200 participants x 4
Camp Programs
4,400
40 kids x 22 weeks x 5 days =4,400
40
annually
Nature Educational Preschool
McClellan Road
-,.~ ~T
Stevens Creek Corridor I
- ^·_·X._~__
Annual. ParticiQ~nt Estimates
~.._.-"-~_.~_.~---~~ -_.. ¡ .. "-- --
Number of Number of
Access Point Program Participants Vehicles
Steloens Creek BIId. Golf Course 64,000 42,666
Restaurant 62,400 41,600
Trail 10,000 5,000
Living History Center 10,950 5,475
Other 1,000 500
San Fernando Aloe. Picnicking 32,550 10,850
Rec Swim 16,275 5,425
Trail 10,000 5,000
Community Eloents 3,000 750
Other 1,000 500
McClellan Road Nature Educational Programs 5,400 1,080
Trail 10,000 5,000
Santa Clara Valley Audubon 500 3,650
Community Gardens 120 5,475
Rolling Hills 4-H 60 2,920
Nature After School Classes 500 500
Other 2,000 1,000
--..__.·~·_~__w - -.-- ---
""'"---'-~--'.__.,. ""~-'----~-- _'~"__m_'''''~__. ----- "._-~-~_..~.~-_."
Alternative Programs
San Femando Aloe Swimming Lessons 800 8,000
Camp Programs 160 3,200
McClellan Road Nature Educational Preschool 40 4,400
\
L
Phiit'
r-
f
f
r
(f)
-
CD
<
CD
:J
VI
()
iiJ
CD
,.-
()
o
..,
..,
a:
o
..,
"U
o
"C
o
VI
CD
a.
"U
DI
..,
,.-
S'
<C
r
DI
'<
o
c
-
/
r
<Ð
CO
<Ð
:J
C.
m
i
Q
g
~
~
,
~
f
~
T
I
J
."
~
!
ŒJ
i
i
r
..
\ 1\·101
if 'f Jill f
J 'l i ~ ii I
I Iii g
I i
\
\
\
f
i!.
i
i
I I ¡ I BY!t18 A.... , r-----
~ IB~B J<I;8n1
Jf fg; ;¡; õ'i;" .. r " i ~ < f J
i Ih¡U4t t t i J t f ~
"1 ~ å f f í f
¡ 3., f ~ § f i
f 'Ii : ~
i
::1:3::
-'0
CC"
::J'_
(/)1»
<><
§" --
_I
)
~
~
~¡~I
~f~i
~
,.
-I