The URL can be used to link to this page

Art in Public Places surveys ART IN PUBLIC PLACES CRITERIA BY CITY limits specified No 1% crp projects 2% Redevelopment Agency Projects · · · Case by case analysis All CIP projects Private developer projects are negotiated at time · · · 1973 Cupertino Davis $500, 00, project valuation; no maximum valuation criteria 1% All public buildings and parks Optional for private development Exempt: Low or moderate income housing projects · · · 987 Fremont 200 Livermore City Public Projects Exempt: pipelines and landscape renovation projects Public Art - Works · · · Neighborhood Murals Long Beach Funded by Redevelopment Agency, $150,000 current year, $50,000 next year · Merced $1,000,000 minimum project valuation; no maximum valuation criteria 1% crp Private projects requirements determined as conditions of . . 1993 1989 Modesto Mountain View part of limits specified No All municipal projects Planning Commission recommendations for . . 1977 Palo Alto No mits specified Capital improvement projects paid by the City to construct or remodel any building, structure, park, or parking facility . 1983 Sacramento within the City limits. City departments negotiate in design and building projects · $500, 000 minimum project valuation; no maximum valuation criteria 2% Capital building and Parks construction 994 City and Redevelopment Agency as well as certain Agency assisted private development projects All crp · · No limits specified 1% 50/50 city match for private development (voluntary) Strongly encouraged to include Percent to be · · · proposed Recommend · San Diego San Jose San Luis Obispo San Mateo Santa Clara 1990 placements and purchase of lJUblic art · No limits specified No limits specified 2% 1% Funding not addressed in 2001 All eligible crp All eligible Enterprise Fund crp Scope not addressed 01 · · · Santa Cruz Santa Monica Solana Beach *The California Supreme Court has determined that requiring developers to provide art in an area of a project that is reasonably accessible to the public is, like other design and landscaping requirements, a kind of aesthetic control well within the authority of the City to impose. The City could impose such a requirement by adoption of an ordinance which imposes the requirement upon 2002 Oct. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ARTIST SELECTIONS Placer County artists ART PLACEMENT LOCATIONS Public Property or supported by public funds Not specified No residency required Developer chooses. Not mentioned/Murals Part of development project Part of development project. Max fee project $150,000 Mural Theme criteria Ordinance Juliette Tyson Laureen Morick Selection panel A "Call to artists" prospectus will be mailed to artists registered with or requesting forms from the Arts Office and sent to newspapers and advertised in "Artweek." Not specified City Property, Main Library, Arts Office, Safety Center/Fire Sation, Faraday Center, Water District Facility, Harding Center, Senior Center, Fire Stations 1- 6, Parks, Scenic Corridors, Natural Open Space & Recreation Corridors, and Railroad Corridor All commercial, industrial, and mixed use projects less than 25,000 sq ft. All public facilities constructed by the City or RDA Not specified City owned buildings, City parks, City rights-of-way, and City owned or maintained public place Donated items Guidelines for murals and public art Not specified Murals are only permitted in certain areas of the City as provided by their Municipal Code. Not mentioned murals tfor Sign perm CITY Auburn Barstow Calabasas Campbell Carlsbad Cathedral City Claremont Covina SPENDING LIMITS Budgeted amount derived from general funds. Not mentioned ORDINANCE/POLICY Ordinance CONTACT PERSON Marilyn Hamner Not mentioned $60,000 Art Budget 00-02 Annual Budget Request RFQ Ordinance/Master Plan Zarka Popovic Ms No limits specified Resolution Public Art Private Development ReqUirement ._---~--_._~~-- Ives applies to all projects $1 milliorl ____J~!Jtrea~~_..~~._<?~E1struE.tion CO~~..~ Iyes, applies to commercial, office, Iyes, applies to commercial, office, and land industrial projects greater _______l.ind"-s~ri"'l. projects greatert~",-n1i5,Ogo.~g~~"'1l15,go_o.-,,'1.ft:_ . i Public Development ReqUirement red Approval Requ million or , I IYes, applies to all projects $1 ¡greater in construction costs ·__·__1_···______······......____·······__········'····___'___m__n_______.________·_ ._._"_..._--_.._---~-_._-- I ; ! I r I 1 City --...--. ~~_nni~~.._S;o'!'_~_~.~~~?_~_ I Da'!õI_~(!"_t(<:>ran9~c:;0~nt}') Cathedral City (located in the9'-"-"~-"lIa\!alley) lY~~- Public Art Commission ¡yes ------¡-...---.... !yes, applies to capital Improvement Iprojects 1.5% of project budget goes Into, ¡ Public Art Fund ; No . ' -~---.--"--'-"----- ,..-" , . Public Art Commission ~ista~~",~__()I,,~o County) (Northern Berkeley S:_alifor~i~) Berkeley Civic Arts Commissio~~. yes, for work greater than $350,000' 1 % total construction cost must be Iyes, City & Redevelopmet Agency spent on public art on-site. For wor, !obligated to install art of 15% of total valued over $2 million, 40% of that developmert0nstruction costs for public buildings (not 1 % goes directly to Public Art Fund" 60% must be spent on site. Infrastructure Public Art Committee (scope and final selectionl (San Emeryville Francisco Bay) Public Art -------T-..----~-·------------....-..-----....----,-------------.-..---~~----..~~---..-I I I Private , , , , , , I ' . , , , , , , , , , I , ! ! Development Requirement Public Development Requirement , yes, the City has annual budget and plan I for the Publicly Visible Art Program. 1 % o~ total construction valuation ¡yes red Approva Commission "~_.__._--~---,. , , i I Requ Planning ---.----- -~-----------_._. City IHuntington Park (Los Angeles County) Public Art "---:-- .----,------ ..------....---.,-.--...---------. , ' ' ii' , ' ; , ' ' ¡ I I Public Development I n~, I I I Requirement : ' i ¡ i -L ! ! i i i IArt Panel (staff from Community 1 I I Development Department and Publ c I I J.w0rks and_Parks and Recreation) ___ ¡yes, 1'if~-"fva~u_a.ti9_n of an eligible project 11°/~ of jing e.~~~~yaluati9_~~ !Art Advisory Board responsible for I 'ublic! I IArt Program (approves all projects Iyes, all city departments includes 2% of ! !advises City Council on policies ani I !construction cost of project valuation !yes, M 1ing funds from Public Art 'guidelines and appoints Artist Sele, lion 1$50,000 or greater directly transferred to [Fund l I as incentive to donate Committee) ¡Public Art Fund ¡funds. ___..__.__.......______...___..n..__________·__ ···--1·----------- ------r--.---... .--- Private u.Jvelopment Requ rement i red Approva i Requ City (Santa Clara Sunnyvale County) j Iyes (in process of Public Art Master city uses! Plan) currently city uses 1% of ¡construction cost. lves;-wHhlormaf'agTeerœnt"wifh I City or Redevelopment Agency lAnd projects with valuation of '$100,000 or greater 1% of construction cost ; I ¡Yes, no percentage on policy but c_~~!!.c::~____J~~~!..:::.?nstruction cost I Heritage and Cultured Art Commission ¡ re""rTlll1.e~d~Pl1Jje-"tto_<:;it~. !"odi__ (Sa~J-,,~c¡uin Valle~) Dublin (Tn-Valley Region of San ~",~~i~c.0) ¡Ves, applies to capital Improvement [projects with valualion of $100,000 or greater. 1 % of constructIon cost ._-~+.__._----_.------ Architectural Commission ......n_________........___.______ Claremont I n/a , yes, 2% gross construction cost San Francisco Art Commission San Francisco Public Art Private Development Requirement - .._...__.~ "-----.--...--.----- ¡ i . i ! ¡ ! i i I i ! I ! : ¡ . . ' ¡ ¡ I i I Iyes, 2% of the 1st $1 million spent or I I I project and 1 % of a project valued in I J!:'_r!~_~~!!.!i.~_~.~~______.__._.__________._.,.,.l~_~~~_of $X.!!1illion _._.___________ ____.J~~__ ," ; i i i ~ ¡Art in Public Places Committee (develop$ Isite specific arts plan, administrates artist! ¡Citrus Heights (Sacramento ¡contract and coordinates schedules with County) lconstructlon schedule :yes, 2% ----.-------.-.----- Public Developmen. Requirement red Approva Requ City no of construction budjJ.et (\I""tLJr",--c::.?_~-"~L__ ()jai Final Approval of Artwork Maintenance Fees n Lieu Fees Commission ..._..._ ......_.____n_._ ¡:>lannin!J , . , Iyes, contribution to Public I ! art ill-lieu fund equal to ! -lll1illin:',!!,:,-"aIUe_f?~_!~"_artj",ppli",,,nt res",,_~sibilitL__ \yes, contribution is 1% of ' (90%) of the project's of construction valuation -. .... ..._------_._._.__._-~---_.. .!.c;rty Cou ncil -JS:ity Counci ii!'"I~(je~ír1.p.r?¡,,-"t propo"-",I , , , , iN/A --------·--·--------1---· ,Berkeley CIVIC Art Commission _!!'?t"~n:,,ntll'._ City CounCfl [City sets aside 10% from art !fund to maintain publicly [owned artworks. Artwork on Yes, Payment into Public ¡private property is maintained Art Fund Ibvowner Residential Included y"s____________ no --.-.--....-..-.--. N/A ______.._..__..u_ no --.-..---..".-. not currentl N/A not CUrr,,!'tlL___ "---~--"'"'------- Final Approval of Artwork - - City Counci ----" , , , , , , L... , ! , IVes, Applicant pays 1 % of City maintains after applicant ltotal construction valuation records convenant form __"_n_____·__ Maintenance Fees ~a "-~--~-- In Lieu Fees Residential ncluded Final Approval of Mamtenance Fees n Lieu Fees I Residential ncluded I Artwork --- , , I City Council reviews Public J""rt?ro_wam"'ll~lI"'~Y ICity (Department of Parks an~ I Recreation) maintains Public i IArt. Property owner maintain~ !art ¡City Counci ----t-.--.---.-------.------~~. I i .lx~~,_£,ub~~_Art Fund nla ----_. , --_.._--t~~!Y maintains art ,~í~'y ~?_~~_~_i ~~ Architectual Commission San Francisco Art Commission ICity maintains art, but no fund get~et up to repair and maintain --J pie~~~~__ ___ , no Yes, master plan suggests 1 % for projects. For projects without art included in project, 2% paid into art fund. no --~---_..-_..__.._.__.- n/a ; i i in/a ....L_....... 1 yes Community Art Program Fund ----------------. 0.5% of total construction cost of $200,000 or greater (except individually bUI homes) % sets aside maintain ¡Art Commission [from project to n/a n/a ..._...__..~~--~----.-._._-_......._---~~~--- Fina Approval of Artwork Maintenance Fees n Lieu Fees Residentia ncluded , , , , i ¡City Council -·····ìsaramento M~~~·¡;;-ïit~-n JArts Commission I<nationallY recognized I percent for art program of 1 Sacramento County,; I ; Jes, into P~b~ic A~~ FU"-dJ,~,,,__ ! ! , ! ¡yes, Art in Public Places ¡Program n/a n/a n/a DFAF & CDD Advisory capacity to developer. Not specified Major streets, intersections, large outdoor spaces within private projects, bus shelters, benches, walkways & fencing. Public parks & open space. Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned Resolution Criteria set in the Municipal Code for murals Theresa Vvonne Not specified Not mentioned 1% of all new developments for public art. Resolution, Ordinance & Policy Abby Thorn-Lyman Not specified Not specified Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned Local students participating in the "One Voice Arts and Leadership Mural Program." All practicing artists residing in the Bay region Downtown area (must be In harmony with the downtown design criteria). Not mentioned Mural program RFP for Public Art Project Planning Commission & City Council approval all murals. Roy Chance Civic Center Municipal Parking structure installation of final art on two sheer walls. Specific Project $37,000 Public Arts RFQ for project Not specified Not specified Historic murals / downtown Murals shall be located on the sides of buildings and walls within commercial and industrial zoned property in the City of Klngsburg. Not mentioned Not mentioned Mural Perm Application/Mural Ordinance Not specified New buildings, paint, awnings, façade treatment within the redevelopment project area #2 (downtown area). Public area Not mentioned Not mentioned, but has a Design Review Commission for murals. Not specified No lim its specified Policies & G u idel ines/Resolutlon Dublin Dunsmuir Emeryville Exeter Gardena Greenfield Haywood Indio Kingsburg Merced Oregon City Not specified Not mentioned/Murals Not mentioned Ordinance/Design Guidelines Ordinance/Guidelines Pacifica Not specified Commicial development 1/2% from developers Fee from developers. Not mentioned Ordinance Debbie Diane Morgan 778-8408 Annette Johnson Palm Desert Palm Springs Open to all artists Limited to public places where readily accessible to the public pool Not specified Artist 5 locations for this particular RFP Not mentioned Not mentioned Public Ar Not subject to formal design review process for murals. Ordinance/Resolution RFPfor Projec' Pico Rivera Rancho Cucamonga Not specified Non-residential development with a total cost in excess of $100,000. Non-residential development with a total construction cost in excess of $100,000 include public art with a value of one-half percent (.5%) of the total construction cost. Not mentioned San Luis Obispo Not specified APPC Commissions the Artists. No residency required Not mentioned APPC selects location 3 $15,000 or more years must lapse between purchase contracts Review process for murals. Resolution & Policy Chuck Rust San Rafael Santa Rosa Not specified Not mentioned in Policy Public area. PAAC selects locations No limits specified Not mentioned Policy Draft Policy (5/2002) for public art and Mural Ordinance. Jim Schooier Vista Yucca Valley The Arts and Cultur Division staff and the Art Private Development Committee make the deteriniation whither the artist is an active professional artist by reviewing such items ass the person's educational background in the arts, arts accomplishments within the past five years such as gallery or museum exhibits and the person's recognition by accepted arts organizations as an artist. Selected through PAAC n Artwork selected by the developer to be integrated on the site of the project must be located on an exterior of the structure or the building site which is visible to the public for at least 40 hours per week. Exterior of any City maintained facility, within any City maintained facility, and/or in areas designated as public areas, lobbies, and public assem bly areas The developer's investment in public art involves a minimum Investment per square foot based on the CPI, which will be adjusted up or down annually. The 2002 value is 35 cents per square foot. Public Art Fund Solicited design proposals and/or quaiified artists by Parks & Rec staff Input from Sunnyvale Arts Commission, City Staff, Interested citizens and project arch itects Not specified Buildings and walls within Tuiare Improvement Program area B and any other commercially or industrially zoned property within the City of Tulare Eligible projects wi be required to provide artwork valued @1% of the valuation of an eligible project not to exceed $500,000 Not mentioned Ordinance, Resolution, Guidelines TBA Policy (5/2001 ) Mural application Sedona, Arizona Ginger Wolstencroft Solana Beach Sunnyvale Nancy Stewart Tulare