Loading...
Reso 6799RM -2®15-®8 CITY OF CUP E1RTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUP E1RTINO DENYING AIT APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'S D ECISION TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SECOND - STORY ECOID- STO RY BALCONY ON THE NEW RESIDENCE AT 211900 ®AKVI EW LANE SECTION I: PROI CT DESCRIPTION Applicat®n No.: ]RM -2015-08 Applicant: WEC & Assoc. ( Kin g kay Capital, LLC) Appellant: Matthew and Angela Milner, 21884 Oakview Lane Location: 21900 ®akvnew Lane. (APP 326-19®1105) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR A MINOR RESIDENTIAL PERMIT: WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino received an applicati®n for a Minor Residential Permit as described in Sect.®n I ®f this ]Resolution; WHEREAS, the necessary notices were given and the comment period for the applleati®n was provided as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City ®f Cupertino; WHEREAS, tae City was able to make the findings required under Section 1 9028.140 (A) and the application was approved with conditions on January 8, 20160 and WHEREAS, the notice tiee ®f decision was mailed t® the appropriate parties, including the applicant and any pens®n who contacted City staff with comments during the comment period, notifying them about the possibility ®f appealing a project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission ®f the City ®f Cupertino received an appeal for the Community Development Director's approval ®f the Minor ]Residential Permit; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been givens as required by the Procedural Ordinance ®f the City ®f Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has ]held at least one public ]hearing in regard t® the appeal; and Resolution No. 6799 RM -2015-08 February 23, 2016 WHEREAS, the appellant has not met the burden of proof required to support said appeal; and WHEREAS, the project is determined to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: a) The project is consistent with the Cupertino General Plan, any applicable specific plans, zoning ordinance and the purposes of this title. The project is consistent with the regulations and intent of the Cupertino General Plan and Single -Family Residential (R-1) Ordinance. The project complies with all established and required setbacks, privacy protection planting requirements and other Municipal Code requirements. In addition, the second story balcony and privacy protection requirements of the R-1 Ordinance are met. b) The granting of the permit will not result in a condition that is detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. The granting of the permit will not result in a condition that is detrimental or injurious to property improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare as the projects is located within the R1-10 (Single Family Residential) zoning district, and will be compatible with the surrounding uses of the neighborhood. The purpose of the R-1 ordinance is to provide light, air and a reasonable level of privacy to individual residential parcels, ensure a reasonable level of compatibility in scale of structures within the neighborhood and reinforce the predominantly low -intensity setting in the community through prescriptive requirements incorporated in the R-1 ordinance. The neighborhood is in transition and there is a healthy mix of single story and two story homes in the general area making the proposed project compatible with the neighborhood. c) The proposed project is harmonious in scale and design with the general neighborhood. The proposed project is located in a residential area consisting of single-family homes with a mix of single -story and two-story homes. The proposed project maintains the single-family home scale found compatible with the general neighborhood. Resolution No. 6799 -2015-08 February 23, 2016 d) Adverse visual impacts on adjoining properties have been reasonably mitigated. Any potential adverse impacts on adjoining properties have been reasonably mitigated through the privacy protection plantings required to reasonably obscure the viewsheds of the second story balcony. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration ®f naps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject t® the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning ®n ]SAGE 2 thereof, the appeal ®f an application for a Min®r Residential Permit, Application n®o ]CSM -2015-08 is hereby denied and the Director of Community Development°s approval ®f the Min®r Residential Permit is upheld; and That the subconclusn®ns upon which the finings an conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application n®o ]CTI®2015-08 as set forth in the Minutes ®f Planning Commission Meeting ®f ]February 23, 2016, and are incorporated by reference as though Billy set forth.. Derain. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED PROTE T This approval is lased on a plan set entitled, "'New Residence 21900 ®alkview Lane, Cupertino CA" consisting ®f eleven sheets labeled ""Ao1 t® A.10 an a topographic survey dated "'Received January 6, 2016" except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2e ANNOTATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The conditions ®f approval set forth shall be incorporated into and annotated ®n the building plans. 3e ACCURACY OF THE PROJECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible t® verify all pertinent property data including but n®t limited t® property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/®r construction records. Any misrepresentation ®f any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 4. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions ®f approval contained in file no. ICS -2015-08 shall be applicable t® this approvals Resolution No. 6799 RM -2015-08 February 23, 2016 5. COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC WORKS CONFIRMATION FORM The project shall comply with the requirements indicated on the Public Works Confirmation form, including, but not limited to, dedications, easements, off-site improvements, undergrounding of utilities, all necessary agreements, and utility installations/relocations as deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works and required for public health and safety. The Public Works Confirmation is a preliminary review, and is not an exhaustive review of the subject development. Additional requirements may be established and implemented during the construction permitting process. The project construction plans shall address these requirements with the construction permit submittal, and all required improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works prior to final occupancy. 6. GEOTECHNICAL PLAN REVIEW The applicant's geotechnical consultant shall inspect, test, and approve all geotechnical aspects of the development plans to ensure that their recommendations have been incorporated. The Geotechnical Plan Review should be submitted to the City for review by the City staff prior to issuance of permits. 7. GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS The applicant's geotechnical consultant shall inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The inspections shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: site preparation and grading, site surface and subsurface drainage improvements and excavations for foundations and retaining walls prior to the placement of steel and concrete. The following shall specifically be performed: The applicant's geotechnical consultant shall inspect all foundation excavations to ensure that the subsurface conditions are as anticipated, and that footings are embedded sufficiently into competent earth materials. The results of these inspections and the as -built conditions of the project shall be described by the geotechnical consultant in a letter and submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to final project approval. 8. PRIVACY PLANTING The neighbors on the east side stated they will waive the privacy tree requirement in order to gain sun exposure to their property, therefore those privacy plantings are not indicated on the plans. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall submit the waiver and the final privacy -planting plan (of all required privacy planting) for review and approval from the Planning Division. The variety, size, and planting distance shall be consistent with the City's requirements. Should a waiver not be obtained, the Resolution No. 6799 ISM -2015-08 February 23, 2016 applicant shall plant all required privacy planting in compliance with the R-1 9. PRIVACY PROTECTION COVENANT The property owner shall record a covenant on this property to inform future property owners of the privacy protection measures and tree protection requirements consistent witlh. the R-1 Ordinance, for all windows with views into neighboring yards and a sill height that is 5 feet or less from the second story finished floor. The precise language will be subject to approval by the Director of Community Development. Proof of recordation must be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to final occupancy of the residence. 10. LANDSCAPE PROJECT SUBMITTAL: The applicant shall submit a full landscape project submittal, per sections 49001, 49201, and 49203 of the Department of Nater Resources Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, foryro�ects with landscal2e area more than 500 square feet; the applicant shall . submit either a full landscape project submittal or submit the ]prescriptive Compliance Checklist per Appendix D of the Department of Water Resources Model Nater ]Efficient Landscape Ordinance for projects with landscape area more than 500 square feet and less than 2,500 square feet. The Landscape Documentation Package or ]prescriptive Compliance Checklist shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfactions of the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 11. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 12. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALSITREATMENTS Final building exterior treatment plan (including but not limited to details on exterior color, material, architectural treatments and/or embellishments) shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The final building exterior plan shall closely resemble the details shown on the original approved plans. Any exterior changes determined to be substantial by the Director of Community Development shall require a minor modifications approval with neighborhood input; Resolution No. 6799 RM -2015-08 February 23, 2016 13. INDEMNIFICATION Except as otherwise prohibited by law, the applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its City Council, and its officers, employees and agents (collectively, the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void this Resolution or any permit or approval authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The applicant shall pay such attorneys' fees and costs within 30 days following receipt of invoices from City. Such attorneys' fees and costs shall include amounts paid to counsel not otherwise employed as City staff and shall include City Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. 14. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of February, 2016, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chair Takahashi, Vice Chair Gong, Sun, Paulsen, Lee NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: Piu Ghosh Principal Planner APPROVED: Alan Takahashi Chair, Planning Commission