Loading...
Reso 6802ASA -2015-13 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenge Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6802 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, OF THE CITY OF CIUP ERTINO APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF A 342 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX (THE HAMPTONS) AND TPIP CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 942 UNIT APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT ON THE SAME SITE WITH ASSOCIATED SITE AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS IN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE AT 195001 RUNERIDGE AVENUE SECTION Ie PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ASA -2015-13 Applicant: Carlene Matchniff Property Owner: Irvine Company Location: 19500 Pruneridge Ave (APN: 369-06-032,--516-06-037) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the ]Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Committee has reviewed the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; The project site is located in an area designated for residential land uses in the "General Plan and would contribute to additional improvements to the area, including bicycle and pedestrian linkages. The project is designed to minimize impact upon the surrounding community and the environment. Centrally located amenities and recreation areas promote use of on-site resources, which increases opportunities for a sense of community and reduction of vehicle miles traveled. The spaces between buildings are activated with a series of interior walkways, courtyards on all quadrants, and amenity spaces. These spaces also provide visual relief, Resolution No. 6802 ASA -2015-13 May 10, 2016 gathering places, and walking/biking proximity and accessibility to Apple Campus 2 and other off-site resources. The design elements support the intent of attracting a demographic that prefers to be less dependent on cars and a more active lifestyle, which promotes public health. 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 19.134, Architectural and Site Review, of the Cupertino Municipal Code, the General Plan, and applicable specific plans, zoning ordinances, conditional use permits, exceptions, subdivision maps, or other entitlements to use which regulate the subject property including, but not limited to, adherence to the following specific criteria: a) Abrupt changes in building scale should be avoided. A gradual transition related to height and bulk should be achieved between new and existing buildings; The Project avoids abrupt changes and provides a gradual transition by observing the height and setback requirements within the General Plan which specifies a 1:1 slope line drawn from the curb line of Pruneridge Avenue and Wolfe Road, a 75 feet height limit, and a 60 feet height limit within 50 feet of Wolfe Road, Pruneridge Avenue and Apple 2 Campus. Existing perimeter trees, most of which are mature Coast redwoods, are being preserved to provide a landscape buffer zone between city streets, where there are existing buildings, and the proposed new buildings. b) In order to preserve design harmony between new and existing buildings and in order to preserve and enhance property values, the materials, textures and colors of new buildings should harmonize with adjacent development by being consistent or compatible with design and color schemes, and, with the future character of the neighborhood and purposes of the zone in which they are situated. The location, height and materials of walls, fencing, hedges and screen planting should harmonize with adjacent development. Unsightly storage areas, utility installations and unsightly elements of parking lots should be concealed. The planting of ground cover or various types of pavements should be used to prevent dust and erosion, and the unnecessary destruction of existing healthy trees should be avoided. Lighting for development should be adequate to meet safety requirements as specified by the engineering and building departments, and provide shielding to prevent spill-over light to adjoining property owners; The orientation of residential units, in relation to public and private spaces, preserves harmony by providing a combination of privacy and natural light. Perception of massing is reduced through several design elements: (a) the bicycle hub's location at the corner of Wolfe and Pruneridge Avenue anchors a pedestrian - oriented frontage including a plaza area; (b) articulated walls; (c) the preservation of large -scaled property line trees which create a landscape buffer zone at the exterior of the property on all sides, including Wolfe Road and 1-280, (d) community buildings and amenity areas utilize larger glass facades or windows; (e) the buildings step down along city streets so that the tallest portion of the buildings are within the center of the site. The spaces between buildings are activated with a series of interior walkways, courtyards on all quadrants, and amenity spaces. These spaces also provide visual relief, gathering places, and walking/biking proximity and accessibility to Apple Campus 2 and other off-site resources, these site and architectural design elements Resoluti Resolution No. 6802 ASA -2015-13 May 10, 2016 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of May 10, 2016, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval recommendation is based on (1) the architectural, civil, landscape and signage plan set dated received January 29, 2016 consisting of ninety (90) sheets labeled "The Hamptons Redevelopment" and prepared by Arquitectonica, BKF, Olin and RSM Design; (2) colors and materials board dated October 13, 2015 and prepared by Arquitectonica; (3) perspective exhibits labeled "Amenity Deck Views" dated July 29, 2015 prepared by Arquitectonica; except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. ACCURACY OF PROTECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 3. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. DP -2015-04, TR -2015-21, U-2015-05, DA -2015-01, and EA -2015-03 and shall be applicable to this approval. 4. ANNOTATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The conditions of approval set forth shall be incorporated into and annotated on the first page of the building plans. 5. FINAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS AND EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS The final building design and exterior treatment plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits and through an in -field mock-up of colors prior to application. The final building exterior plan shall closely resemble the details shown on the original approved plans. Portland Cement plaster and finish coat cut sheet shall be incorporated into the construction drawings with a "Santa Barbara Finish" or other comparable formula designed to provide a smooth, five -coat stucco finish texture over Portland Cement base coats. 6. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 7. INDEMNIFICATION Except as otherwise prohibited by law, the applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its City Council, and its officers, employees and agents (collectively, the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, Resolution No. 6802 ASA -2015-13 May 10, 2016 or void this Resolution or any permit or approval authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorneys" fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The applicant shall pay such attorneys" fees and costs within 30 days following receipt of invoices from City. Such attorneys' fees and costs shall include amounts paid to counsel not otherwise employed as City staff and shall include City Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. 8. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS, OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 101h day of May, 2016, at the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chair Takahashi, Vice Chair Gong, Paulsen, Sun NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Lee ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: 10, Aarti Shrivastava Dir, Community Development Alan Takahashi, Chair Planning Commission