The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 06-22-87'· ... CI'1Y OF aJPERI'INO, STATE OF CJU.IroRNIA 10430 So. De Anza Blvd • . eupert-...ino, CA. 95014 (408) 252-4642 MINUl"'ES OF 'DiE REGUIAR MEEl'ING OF 'IBE PL\NNill'G o:::MIT.SSION HELD ON JUNE 22, 1987 Meeting Held in the Interim O:.iuncil 01ambers, 10500 N. Ce Anza Blvd. SAWI'E 'l.'O 'IHE FLAG; ROLL CAIL: Comroiqsione.rs Present: Cl'lairman Mackenzie Vice ~ So:re...'1Se.11 Ccmmi.ssioner A.dams Commissioner Clau:.iy Callm.i.ssianer szaLo 7:00 P.M. Staff Present: ~ • I ' Rt.:bert Cowan, Di:ooctor of Plann.ID:J & I:Evelopnant St.ave Piasecki, Assistant Plannin:;; Director Sonia Bi.men:iyk1 Planl'W.:' II Glen Grigg, Traffic En;Jineer Peggy M. Cocker, Dep.lty City Attorney APPPDVAT ... OF MINUl'ES au:. Mackenzie requested the followirq changes: On Page 4 I final motion to read, 11 corrlition 16 is am?..rxied. tr::i make the :cequirement for so, 000 sq. ft. of c::omroo.rcial space optional .•• 11 On Page 7, third paragrdph, final sentena:! to read, "Mr. 'Perry conf irn'l2d that t.hiG W-d.S his underst:and..in3'. " M:JI'ION: cam. sore.nsen, to ai:prove the Minutes of the Regular M.eetirq of June a, 1987, as amended. SEOOND: c.am. Adams VOTE: Passed 5=0 :ros'I'roHEMENTS OR NEW AGENDl\ ITEMS: -Item 6: Applicant requests continuance to the Planning Commission Meeting of July 13, 1987 MOTION: Com. Sore.n .. c;en :rroved to continue Item 6 to July 13, 1987. SECOND: Com. Adams VOI'E: P-d.Ssed 5-0 WRI'ITEN CCM'1UNICATIONS -Letter from Ms. Barbarba McClosky received in reic;ard to Item 11 -Letter from Mr. Jim Jackson withdraw~ Item 11, A. Prj.v~te ~ests. -Letter from Santa Clara co. Health Officer. -1- PI.ANNiliG a:l1MISSION MINl1I'E:3 Regular Meeti.l'X] of J\.lne 22, 1987 PAGE 2 PC -522 ORAL C01MlJNICAT!ClNS -None P' ... 'B!.:rC HEARINGS: r.I'EM i Application No(s) Applicant: Propel.'ty ~: IJ:x:a ti on: USE PERMIT •ro operate an existing" gasoline sarvial static.n on a 24-hcur per day resi.s. FIRST H.F.ARmG a::Nrnru:ED El'N.I:RCtlMENI'AL DEI'ERMilOO'ION: Negative Declaration TENTATIVE crT'l <XXJNCIL HEA.l'UNG DATE: July 6, 1987 (OONI'JlWED Fm-1 'If!E MEErING OF JUNE B, 1987) ITEM 2 Application No(s) Applicant: Property Owner: UX:atian: Parcel Ji..rea (Acres) : 20-U-87 arrl 20-EA-87 Cl!E!_Y!UTL_JJSA=.::...-------· M.ardes~~~~--~~~~--~Soutl:furg2t corner of St"..ev?fl.S Crc::ek ~.eyartj_ and Qe l\nZ? Boule~---~-~~~---~ 0.58 net USE .i?ERMIT 'Ib operate an exi£tj_n:3 5€'..rvice station on a 24 hour per day basis. FIRST HEARING CONI'INUED ENVIRONMENrAL DEI'ERMilOO'ION: Negative Declardtfon TENTATIVE CITl 'J':JJNCIL HEARlliG DM'E: July 6, 1987 (CONTINUED FRCM 'lliE MEETING OF JUNE 8 / 1987) e PIANN.rnG Cll".ll'1ISSION MINUrES Ragu.lar Meeting of June 22, 1987 PAGE 3 PC -522 ITEMS 1-5 (Cont'd) ITEM 3 ,.,.:. Application No(s) Applicant: =25~:U-"'--~07,__,,,and==-~2~7-~Fll""-'--a~z.__~~~~~~~~--·~ li£<XJ Petto~·---Property owner: Location: 2._amg:--~~~~~~---,-~~~~~~~ $1\lthe&it comer ot~lim Rood w s~ creek ~'--~~~~·~~~~~~~ .t.9~- USE .PEIMIT To operate ci snack shop at an existing se:r:vice at.a.tio11 on a· 24 boor basis. 1:-rnsT HEARrnG OJNTINUED ENV-:moNMEN.rAL DETERMINATION: Negative Declara.tion 'l"ENXATIVE CJT'i ca.JNCIL HEARmG DATE: JUly 6 1 1987 (o::lNT!NUED Ffl(J{ 'IHE MEE'l'ING OF JUNE 8, 1987) ITll{ 4 Application No(s) At:Plicant: Property Q,Jner: Location: USE PERMI'l' To operate a snack shop at an existing service stat.ton. FIRST HEARlNG CON'I'IlmED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Negati.ve Declaration TENTATIVE CTI!'i OXJNCIL HEARING DATE: July 6, 1987 (00.NTINUED FRCM 'IHE MEErmG OF JUNE 8, 1987) :rrrn 5 Application No(s) Applicant: Property owner: I.ocation: Parcel Area (Acres) : USE PERMIT (27-U-87) ~"'«est corne,;r of Val.l§Y.: Grefill Qrive a.rd ___ l& Anza Boulevard,,___ __________ . .d.9 ne..t.__ .59 gross. To operate a snack shop at an existinq service station .on a 24 hour basis. FIRST HF~?.fUNG CONI'INUED _ DWIRJNM.EN.rAL DETERMINATIOO: Negative DecJ.aration TENrATIVE CITY OXJNCIL HEARING I:Wl'E: July 6, 1987 (CONI'INUED J:'"'RCM 'IHE MEE'l"ING OF JUNE g I 1987) P!...ANN'rnG Ol'1MISSION MINUI'ES Regular Meeting o! June 22, 19137 PAGE 4 PC -522 !'I'F.MS 1-5 (Cont'd) Staff ~on: Mr. Piasecki outlined the proposed. Specific Security Plan bai.rq presented; ha stated that this plan had been in::lnded in the reoammen:ied Conditions of ApproVal. 'll1.e · Sheriff's Office felt t.hat optional elements of the Plan, video cameras and silent alarms, :bad solid evidence justifyin:J the e::<.pe.n!"..e of requirin;f t.'lese ele:i.rents; in ad¢1.ition, the.re were. conoer.ns expressed by the Sheriff's Depart:mant regarding the use of bullet resistant glass. 'IM considerable e::x:pense of such glass w·dS cited. Staff ~ approval of tba i:equeat for a 24 hour opf'..ratior& where there was rP...asonable separation fran residential areas (Items 1, 2 ard 5); Item 3 was not l::le.in] recamnerx:led for a 24 hour operation due to proxi:mity of adjacent eudsti.nq arrl future residential uses. J\pplicant' s ~ Mr. c. Per.ry, O'lsvran Representative, presented infonnation on Olevron' s policies for a 24 houx: operation and x:econfitlred that such was voluntary on the part of the dealer! ha WdS not opposed to a C"J.ause statirq such. Olavron concurs with the Sheriff's recammen:iations for se:.."1.lrity measures and will oomply with all other con:litio11s of. Approval. . 1 'Ihere were no other speakers on Itexns 1 arrl 2. A!2Plicant's Presentation: Mr. Jeff .M..ama, ARCO Representative, reviewed the request for a 24 hour operation at two of the three AR'.D stations. AROO was in oanplete agreement with recommerded securit.'y measure...:;; these :measures have already been implemented. With reqa.rd to the re:::ammen1ed denial of a 24 boor operation on Item 3, he noted that the adjacent prq;erty had not been developed a."l:i requested a te.rrq:xJrary use permit for a 24 hour operation until such time as the property was devr:.loped. He cited the State Business/Profession Code which allows oil companies to m:m::late 24 hour operation if t.he station w::;i,s within one-half mile of a state highway, and roted the exceptions contained. in this law. With reycird to Item 4, he requested that the hours Of operation be 6 A.M. to 11 P.M. or 6 A.M. to 10 P.M. It.em 5, all recommendations a.-xl con::litions were acceptable. In response to questions, he stated that ARCO leases prohibited sale of unrelatOO items; Mr. Perry un::lerst.ood that there was a clause that prohi.bite:l ~s sales of unrelated activities at 01.evron stations as well. He had no objection to a specified restriction of such activities. C.an. Adams ~ested that in Con:litions of Approval, III, 3., !}se _JJmitatfo& add, "No additional promotional activities separate from use,q approved in the Pe.rmit shall be allowed.11 Mr. John Mann, Silverado Avenue, ~.m, noted p:rci:>lems wi~ trash and stated that the DeAnza BlVd./Silvera.do Ave. station was a gathe.rin;J place for teenagers; in acklltion, outdoor spea.l"..e.rs are used at this station. In re.span.so to a question addressed by tha Commission, Mr. Pias.ecki suggested a Cor:di tiai. stating, "External speakers shall not be audible beyond the property 1 ine • II Pr.ANNmG a::M1ISSia1 MDJl7I'ES Regular Me.etin;J of June 22, 1987 PAGE 5 PC -522 ITEMS 1-5 (Cont'd) . ,, .. Mr. I.arry Guy, 2 0432 Sil verado Ave. , OJpertino, C'OI1CW:"J::\'!d with· the al:love an:i added that the snack selec..tion at the ARCO station was exte-nsive. He· disp.lted the right of service stations to sell both gas an:l food items. MJl'ION: O::sn. Claudy :moved .to close tho PUblic Hearin; SF..<XND: can. Sorensen VOl'E: Passed 5-0 Com. Adams stated that a Corditian was nece.ssary to ensure basic cleanli- l1P...SS am prwent noise illpam::; to the adjacent :residential; in aclditi:in, there needed to be a prdtlbition against: unrelated business activ.i.ties at service stations. He 1/JOUJ.d. approve It.ems 1-5 with the a.bcwe modifications. cam. SOren."ien o:::i.ncu.rred. with the ex.caption of allowfrq a 24 hru.r operation at Stallirq Pd./stevens Creak Blvd. station. cam. Claudy was favorable to the 6 A.M. to U };l.M. houm of operation for the De.Anza Blvd./Silverado Ave. station; in additic."1 he sugqested: -Conii.tion stating ''The station shall p~ide attractive trash · rollection containers at all corner sites adjacent to ot:hf'..r properties." -Conditions of ~, ~' s., to read, "'Iha cperator shall net' d:>sclJre the window ••• " -In Security,_ 6., 11'1.he cperator shall r~t \..\se tinted wi.ndoN glass." -Ad::l, 11'1.be cashier's counter shall ba adjacent to the w:in:Ia.t. -Add, 11A mini.mum chan:je fun:l shall be kept an h.ani.l.11 -He ooted that any Use Permit can ba reviewed b'/ tb.e O:.:mnission. Ms. o:x::ker Sl.Jggested that a Carilltion ca.lld be added stating that if c::cm:plaints were received, arx'.i with Staff ooncurre.nce, the Use Permit wculd oame be.fore the Commission for review. Mr. Piasecki suggested a statement 11'llle conunis.':lion may :r.-equira an:l the Applicant shall agree to police the st~ area if dem:::ITTStrat:ed that the trash ::...:; ra.lated. to the f~cility.11 cam. Szabo questioned the v.urd.frq, ''m.i..n.inml change fund;" Mr. Piasecki suggested that creilt card sales or exact change be reqi.lired o...fter 11 P.M. Chr. Mack:P..nzie Stmimarized the COrrlitions which appl.ied to all stat.ions: -limitation on unrelated l:u.siness activities -prohibition of external speakers , To those with snack shop q_:ierations, add the follow.i.ng: -requiremP..nt to provide attractive trash collection containers at corners abutting other properties · -if camplaints are received regardi.rq trash, the Use Penu.it would be reviewed by the caromission -Addition of a stat.envant, "The Cc.a.mnissian may requ:i.t"O am the Applicant shall agree to police the surrou.rrli.ng ara.1 if deloo:nstrated that the trash is reJ.ated to the facility.11 To those stat.ions with a 24 hour ope.ration, add the following: -Statement that such operation was voluntary on the part of the dealer -Secu:d ty requirements as &tated above; Stations not cperat.irq 24 hours: hours of operation are 6 A.M. -11 P.M. , ' PI.ANNlNG o:MMISSION MINUI'ES Regular Meeti.n;/ of June 22, 1987 PAGE 6 . ·-:~ 1. ~·.~, ~;~ fJ1~ ifl.J'1 · ... ..:·" .. ~ !~~ f ~J(':(1S:I PC -522 MJITON: c.am. Sorensen m::ivoo the grantirq of a Negative D=claration. SECOND: can. Manis W.l'E: Pas.sen 5-o ''·i' M'.JI'ICN: ceun. mavud awroval of Application 19-U-87 subject to the f.i.ndirqs ani conclusions of this Hearin:I am St.cl.ff Reportt IOOdifie.d as ooted above. SECOND: can. Adams VOI'E: Passed 5-0 M:Y.I'ION: can. Clau:iy lJXjVed the grantirq of a Neqative Declaration. s.EO:lfil: can. Adams VO!'E; 5·0 . I M:r.I'ICN: can. Claudy m::ved approval of Application 20-U-6'.i subjet..'t to the findirqs am. conclusion of th.ls Hearing run staff Report, llXXlified as note<l above. SECCtID: c.ct:Il. Adams . VU!'E: Passed 5-0 MJI'ION: c.am. Szabo JDOVed the grantir.q of a Negative Declaration.· SECDND: Com. Adams VOl'E: Passed s-o MJI'ION: Cam. Szabo IOC1Ved awroval of. A[Jplication 25-U-87 subject to the findings and oonclusions of this Iieari.IXJ and Staff Report, mo:lified as roted above, Hours Of opel."atian 6 A.M. to 11 P.M. ' SEO:lND: can. Sorensen VOTE: Passed 5-0 M:11'ION: can. ).dams moved the granting cf a Negative Declaration. SECOND: can. Soren::uan VOI'E: Passed 5-0 IDI'ION: can. ~ lWl!ed a1~:r-.1\'al of AppUcatian 26-U-87 sul.:iject to the find.in:]s am. cor.clusions of this Hearing an:! Staff Report, mcdified ru1 noted al::ove, Hr.Jt.U:S of ope.ration 6 A.M. to 11 P.M. SECOND: cam. Sorensen VOI'E: P-dSsed. 5-0 M11.'ION: Can. Sorensen maved the granting of a Negative Declaration. SECOND: Cam. Adams VOl'E: Passed 5-0 MJITON: can. Son>..nsen rrDVed awroval of Application 27-U-·87 subject to the firrlir.gs and c.cr¥.":lusions of this Hearin;J ard staff Report, mxti.fied as rmed above. SECDND: Com. Adams V01'E: Passed 5-0 PI.ANNING o:.M'1ISSION mNt1I'ES RS;ular Meetirq of J\lne 22, 1987 PAGE 7 P: -522 ITEM 7 J\t:plication No(s) Applicant: Property cx..iner: Location: Os Arn:a Prq?erti.es,__ _____ . liQktil sj.de of ~~-"""~u....=...,oouc..r~"""-.L~~.._ of Ce Anz_a !PJ.l~------ USE PERMIT To construct a l,000 +-sq. ft. addition to an ex.istirq ll,500 +-sq. ft. l::Wl.din;1 and operate a ocmmarcial (retail) use. A portion of the 1:uildi.nq ~ o.irrently restricted to office uses. FIRST HEARING .ENVIRCt~ ~w: Negative Declaration TENTATIVE CITY CXXJNCIL HEARING Dl\TE: J\tly 6, 1987 ~ff Presf'...ntatj.gi; Mr. 0::1Nan reviEMed t.he histoty of this site, '\'.:he current proposal arrl presented site plans and a '.fi:.iI? :i::ntJ.:'..[1.§ity amt for review by the ca:mnission. Ha s1.nnmarized the issues as: -Trip intensity perfonoance sta:OOard. A determ.inatian was n--~de in the late 1970 's that 1.2 tri,t.'"S per 1000 sq. ft ar:plies to tha ~ M:Juntain operation; th.is ~"D.llllber in the Bartman-As.hlnam ~was not based upon the proportion of space with.L""l the complex l:ut upon the seasonal sales ·of the operation proposed. 'Ihare rema.inerl th.a question of the trip factor for the proposed ope.tatian .. -On-sit.a parJ..-J.n:]; Mr. CXMan ootEld the 21 space park:l.r.g deficit an:i called attention to the proposed Cordition of Approval addressinq this issi..ie. bl:!Plicant 1 s presentation i. Mr. John VidO'Vid1, Property OWne.r, reviewed the backgrourrl of this site, addin:] that the. pi-q;:.osect operation was a· seasonal use. He requested. that an allocation dlfferent from other retail use be used; he notoo the folla.v~ o.:mr:i..J::utozy factors: -Erlstenc.e of two staircases arxi an elevator which limit re.tail space -Reduced volume of sales -f\?Ssibility of ubt.ai.nirq a parkirq ea.seirent from adjacent C1¥Jrlet'S. Corn~ Mams noted. the concessions made in the past an:l his conoexns ~ park:.in::J arrl traffic impacts on the adjacent area includ.in:J the school site; Com. Claudy also noted con::e.rns reqa.:z:d.in;J c.x:inc.essions made. Mr. Bud Hoffman, Applicant, reviewed the charqe.s in his busi.ne.ss CNe:r: the past fifteen years; he cited a significant :red.uction of sales, his desm to :remain in C'Upertfr10 an1 the limited retail space currently available •. He noted that 70% of his busine.c;s oca.:i.rre:.'i. in a four month periOO.. Mr. Victor Vasquez reviewed other retail t.E>.nants on site am. noted that they we.:ce prinariJ.y service retail. Mr. Hoffman added that 50% of his business was conclucted between 6-9 P.M. a.rd weekends. can. Adams suggested. t. ~ Applicant obtain th.a re:;iprocal parkin;J easeioont .1,/, \ '/ " \ { ~- l PI.ANN:rnG o:::MMISSION MINUI'ES Regu.1.ar Meetir:q of June 22, 1987 PAGE 8 PC -522 ITEM 7 (Cont'd) can. Sorensen was favorable to an expansion of the Puilcilm; however, a reciprocal parJd.r.g agreement l!D.lSt be secured by the Applicant. Com. Szabo s~ested grant.irq the. perntit contingent upon ~ this agreement. Can. Claudy ~; h.a que.sti~ the calculations in the trip factor and.lysis. Clu:'. Mackalzie staU!d t.hat a charqe in l:uildin'J size was a o:mcession, noted potential pru:kin;J .impacts am. the shift in shq:pirq patterns that ~d rot doc.-rease traffic at the end of the w:>rki.ng day; ha adcled that a decrease in square footage wc:W.d mean an intensified use of the space. '1be ~plicant was not favorable to a conti!ll.JZU100 of the Application in order tJ:J secure a pat·kin;J easement a.rd ~b:d a decision at that tilooi. M1.t'ION: cam~ Claudy nr.:wed to close the Public H.ea.rirq. sEOJND: o:::rn. sorensen VOTE: Pa.c;;sed 5-o· Ccm. Szal::o stateci that t.ha issue was whether the 1. 34 trip factor was reasonable; he was favon:Wla to this proposal since the Applicant was vacating same of the spao:a Whidl would redtice the trips. can. Claudy did not f1~ the l. 34 trip factor was acceptable; Com. 1lda:n1s an:l Sore.11S!".n concur:re:i. air. Mackenzie noted the additional problem of the adjacent church parkIDJ lot which is used by children as a play ground. MJl'ION:: SECOND~ cam. Claudy :r:eccnimeoo against gr.mtin:J of a Negative Declaration. can. Adams VOI'E: Passed, o:un. Sorensen, Szabo opposed 3-2 M:YI'ION: Com. C'J..a:udy moved to recanmend de.nial of Awlication 28-U-87 not.ID:1 that the project as pre..c:;ented did not provido sufficient trips to JIM".let th.a requirements Of the Use Perr.it. SECOND: can. Mams VOI'E: Passed, ecru. Sorensen, Szabo cpposed 3-2 Break 9:25 -9:50 P.M. ITEM 8 Application No(s) Applicant~ Properly OWne.r: location: Parcel Area (Acres) ~ 2941::§.~7--. 1'fil;nr_.~J:l.Qtion Col..J.V.&YJY:.~-----Bob am I.ori:-qine B:,_i._f=red'-===i _________ _ North sj_de of G_t:anada Avenue approxi.mate:J,y 300 tt. west of QD'lnge Avenue .25 +-. US1~ PERMIT To estabHsh zani.n:J regulations (setbacks, height, etc.) applicable to tvo €'.Xisting sin;Jle:-fa.'1\ily he.mas. FIHST HEAR.LNG ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Previously A.ssessed TENTA'I'IVE c.rIY CXXJNCIL HEARING Ol\'l'E: July 6, 1987 PLANNING a:::MML.SSIOO' MINl1I'ES Regular Meet.i..rq of June 22, 1987 PAGE 9 ~ -522 ITEM B (Cont'd) ', .. ,,, -'J. ~Q!f l're:<;~J.Qru. &-• Piasecki reviewact the Application Md presented e>ehibits; Staff recamme.OOed that exist.in;J sat:backs for the two si'O:lle story homes and accessory structures ha recognized, and that the R-l ordinance be utilized for any additicms or lllXlifications to t:.hese structures. 'Ihe A:[:plicant did not wish to add a oc:anme.nt. There were no other spe.a.k.e.rs. MJI'"lCN: Can. Claudy IllCM'rl to close t'"he Rlblic Hearin:;! SECnID: Can. sorensen WI'E: Passed 5-0 MJI'IOO: can. Claucly ooved to reo:ll!IIDP...n:i approval of AppJ . .i.cation 29-U""'.'87 per t.he Staff Report. s.EO:lND: can. sorensen VOI'E: ~.ed 5-0 ITEM 9 Applic:at.ton No(s) .Awlicant: Property OWner: I.oca.tion: . Paroel. Area (Ac:re.s) : USE PERMIT (16-U-76 (Ame:rded)) To revise restrictions on fast food an:l take-cut establishments ZU'rl consideration of operationaJ. controls for the existin:] Orchard Valley Market Place Shopping Center. FIRST HEl.RING ENVIRDNMENI'AL DEI'ERMINATI.00: Catego1·ic.ally Ex.empt TENTATIVE CTI"f ro.JNCIL HEARING Ill\.TE: July 6, 1987 Staff~..ntation: Ms. Biw..errlyk stated that the amen:huent to the Master Use Per.mit was in response to the direct.:i.on of tlw ca:umi.ssion and the City Col.ID::il; a revised McdAl Resolution was presented.. Sb.ff reca:mrceJ:'ded that focd service t.P..nants adjoinin::j the sei:vi.oe corridor be 1.llu.ited to a maximum of three restaurants. Approv-d.l of the AwHcation was reor:::mm..~ed. · '.Ihe Applicant did not wish to add comment. 'lbe Public .Hearing was opened. Mr. Ron Beinnan rrJ.sed ooncerns rega.rdi.I¥,J pedestrian· traffic due to the open gate at the east en::1 of the service area; he cited safety hazards to. children in tltls .:u:-e.a, bm:glarized haroe.s a.rd p.::itential fire hazards fran the re::l~ t.reei.s. ~ asl<R.d that this area be secured arn that the fire hazard be re:i:rove::l. ·-·~ . ~ ~- ~- PI.ANNDJG a::t1MISSION MINUI'ES Regular Meating of. J\QY~ 22i 1987 PAGE 10 Fe -522 ITEM 9 (COnt 'd) .... ' 1:: ''.!;,'.;_,, n Mr. w.in:u:oor, Applicant, stated that he 'NOUld see to the clean up of the area; he noted past effort.CJ to lock the gate. jJ1 the sel:Vice area. Mr. George Harris, 19731 Bbd:;y Dr., Olpertino, requested clarification on the tenn, "restaurant;" Ms. Binnandyk stated that McHarts Pizza, Pot Sticker and Hagen I:a.as we.re incJ:uded in the term restaurant as ~ to specialty shops. 'Iha square footacJe referred. "to includ.00. the area of these three restaurants plus 1000 square feet. · M:Y.I'ION: D:.lm. Sorensen :uoved to close the Public Hearirq SECOND: can. Adams V'OJ.'E: Passed 5-0 can. sza00 questioned the practical difference between restaurant an:i spec:iality shops t.o residents adjaoent to tl'lis center: can. Claudy noted that the problem of this center was tha preparation of the food whet.her consumed on or off the premises. In terms of impact to adjacent residential thP..re would be oo difference between restaurants a.rd. si;;eciality shops and favored a prohibition on any new tenant prepat'.irq foo:i in proxi.mit.y to the £'..ervic.e area. He would not vote in favor of this Application as it did not adequately a.Odre.ss the prcl:llem. ID!'ION: can. Clau:ly moved to l"'eCCimli9l"rled approval of Application 16-U-76 (Amerx:led) per findings arrl ~usions of this Hearin;r; Cond:i.tian l; OJn:iltion 2., 4 ame.nd£rl to read, "'Iha ~'lXist.irq restaurant ar:rl i.:;pBCiality stores which involve focd preparation on the premises adjoining the portion of the rear corridor with restricted access are allowed to remain; however, no new restaurants or such facilitie.s bwolving food preparation on site shall be allowed in this area. Upon tarminatior.1 of OO..""Up..vcy of exsist1ng establishm::mts, similar establishnw.nts will not be allowed to replace these establ.ishments with the ultimate intent of precludi..rq restaurant arx:l speciality stores involvin;; on-site food preparation~ Corditions 3, 4. SECOND: Cam. Szabo VOI'E: Passed 5-0 OID WSINESS -None NEW BUSil!ESS Chr. MacJr..enzie absent durinJ the follCMlrlg' hearin3'; Vk..e Cllairwaman Sorensen presidirq. PI.ANNING w-!MISBICN MINtJI'ES Regular Meetirq of J\me 22, 1987 PAGE 11 PC -522 ITEM 10 Application 3-M-87 -~isa Y.ackenzie -Requesting approval of a seo:md stocy addition at an existi.rxJ sin:]le story build.irq lina with less than t.ha 10 ft. sideyard setback normally ~ by t.ha ru. Distdct. 'Iha prcpe:rty is located at ll065 I.a Palana Drive. (PI.ANNING o:MfiSSICN ACTICN FINAL UNI.ESB APPFAI.ED) <m. Szabo noted his OOjootion to tha Commission hearing this Item; ha SUNested. this Item be referred to tha ca.mcil. a::n. Claud){ concurred. Ms. COCker noted. the Applicant's right to have his AJ;:plication heax:d a!rl cited the <..:Clll1mOl'l law rule of necessity. In ~we to questions by' the comudssian, Ms. ax:ker revfewed actions av,ailable to the O::mnission. Mr. a.utis COlsan, Representing the AWlicant, stated that referrctl to the City C'a.7.n:::il was aooeptable to Mr. Mackenzie. ~ Mr. Piasecki reviewed the Application and mted that un:1er the Zonirq Utdinarx::e both a U!.C:OOd e/cJ:Jry addition and the propoood sqUare footage wei-e a 111atte.r of right. He reviewed the R-l Ord.inanc:e setback :requ.i.rexoo.nts and the amaI'ded Zanin;J Ord.inanc:e. Staff viewed the proposed encroachment aa m.inoi·; tile request VdSI an appropriate use of t.11e vertical extension rule and :rec:x::m:tlF'..n:led awroval of the Appl:.t.caticn. A,pplic.ant•s Presentation; Mr. OOlsan noted that the .AWlicant had accammodated setback requil."'e'.!OOnts in changes to · proposed decks arX:i reduction of window area. Mr. Jim Mueller, 1055 I.aP"dlOOla Dr., euz;:.ertino, sta .... ...Erl his total objectfon to this Application; ha present.ad diagrams an:i photogLctJ;hs of the area. He noted aesthetic concerns, sun shade arrl privacy :L"'lt..""'USions. He objected to the Staff Report arrl stated that he 'WOUJ.d a~ thia application. Mr. Ridi..ard Kollerer, 11075 I.aPalana Dr., Q.lper"'Jno, stated that ha was in . the process of add.i.nq on to his own house; howevar, the prq;icised addition woold not confonn to tl".le area due to tOO 3300 sq. tt. area requested aro. encroactnnent into the setbac.k. Mr. 'Ibeo:lore Constant, 11056 l.J.ma Vista Dr., eupe:r:tino, noted privacy impacts, loos of his vievi arx:l decrease in property vd.lues; the market value of his bcaua wcold ba reducOO. by $15 -20 7 ooo. In addition, he oot:OO sun blcx::o.:l<age and favorod the setba.cks as required. He noted that the Applicant had iret with the neighbors an:i att:ernpted to accanmodate the.ix wishes. Mr. Joe •rrywell, 11046 Lirr.la Vista Dr., ~.rt:l.110, concun:OO with. t..he above and :relteratro the conoerns expressed. MJI'ION: Com. Adam.s moved to abstain from votirx] an Application 3-M-87 SEroND: Can. Claudy Wl'F.: Passed, OU-. Mackenzie absent 4-0-1 arr. Mackenzie present at 11: P .M. :; . 1 P.U\NNING a»iISSION MJ111Ul'ES Regular Meetin;J of JUne 22, 1987 PAGE 12 FC -522 ITEM 11 Application l-GPA-G7 -o:insidaration of requests to initiate GE>.ne.rai Plan amendments: B) PYblig Request {~t Initi~~ City 9.t;f;icial:U l. Application of FAR Bonus FOUcy to . 'm.IP area (Traffic Intensity Perf~ st:andaxd) clarifyin;l lan]l.lage. 2. Modificati.on of I.and Uea intensity to permit higher density i.-esidential deve.lq;ment for tl~ Manta Viuta area north of steve.ns Creek a:iweva:m, ~ of Highway 85, e:ast: of Peninsula Avenue and sooth of University Way. (Initiated by City D:A.n::il.) 3 . Develq;:ment of design stan:lards to :regulate the height, bulk, arrl mass of sin:;le ·family residential a..,.e.i1~. (Initiat:.:.:i cy city ~il.) (CO?-fl'lliUED FRl'1 'IHE l.f£EI'ING OF JUNE 8 1 1981) TENI'Kl.'IVE CITY <XXJNC.U. HEARING DA'n:: J\lly 6, 1987 M:JI'ION: can. ClaUdy moved to sen:i a Minut.e Orde..t" to the City eooncil stating that the Planninq camnis.<:Jion ~consideration of the amen:m1e.nts. · SECOND: cam. lldanls varE: P-ciSSOO 1 5-0 OIHER BUSINESS: ITF.M 12 Discussion of the "I.utherglen11 supreme court decision. Ms. Cocker reviewed the rutherglen . supi-eme court decision and answei."ed questions addressed by the COmltli£...si0i1. UNFINLSHED BUSINESS -None REIO.RI' OF PI.ANNING <.r..MMISSION -cam. Sorensr.::.n camroonted an a house 0.11 Ga.rd.0.n Gate Dr., b~twee.n Alves am. Beardon which she has :received numerous complaints about. Staff.noteq tl'lat this site was locati.:."1 bl the Co..mty arrl will refer this matt.ex: to county officials. She will be absent at the July 13, 1987, Meeting of the Cr::m:nission. -Com. 1'.damS requ,.E>..sted information QI} lr.JCal car dealership signs ar:d asked for infonnation frcun Ms .. OJcker an another issue. PIANN'Im a:Hll'SSICN MINtJ'.[Ec3 Regular Meet:.irq ot June 22, 1987 PAGE 13 PC -522 RErota1 OF PI.ANNING DIREC'IOR -written P~ subnitted. D!SaJ<".JSICN OF NEWSPAPER CLtPP1NGS -None AOJOORNME:Nr: Having concluded its business, the Planning carmrlssion adjourned at 11:22 P.M. to the next Re;Jular Meeting of July 13, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. ATTEST: Afproved by t.he Plann.in::J CcmuiBsion At the Riegular Meeting Of Ju 1 y 2 7 , , 1987: • __:i'), l~ Danald~ie,