PC 08-13-84. : '
CI~1 Y O!i' 10300. 'rorre
'l'f~lephone:
M!NU'r.Es OP ~L'HE HEOULAR MEETn;a OP
f Hgr"D ON AUG~TST 13;'
Chairperson Blaine c&.lled the meetine; to in the Council' Chumbers, Gity Hall.
SALUTE TO THE F~AG
ROLL CALL
Cor.:;:issioners Preseht :· Commissioner Adams Commissioner Claudy Cummissidner Koenitzer (Late) Comm::l.ssioner Szabo Chairperson Blaine
~taff Present: Assistant PlanninG Director Cowan
Assistant Cit~ Eneineer Whitten City Attorney Kilian Planner I Piasecki Traffic Engineer Grigg
APPROVAL OF ~INUTES
i1~0'J:ION:
St:COf·JD:
\TC~i1l~:
Com. Claudy, to approve the Minutes of June 25, as st.Jbmitted. Com. Adums Passed (Com. Koenitzer ~bse~t) 4-0
il'iO'l'ION: Com. Adams, to approve the ;\'::lnutes of .Tuly 18, J.98~ as submitted.
~ECO~D: Corn. Claudy
VO~rE: Passed I/-0 (Com. Koenitzer absent)
Co~. Adwns to approve the Minutes of July 23, 1984 as ~rnb!nitt~d. Co:n. Claudy
rnssed 4-0 (Coe. Koenitzer absent)
:.~o:·:. rla:!.nc ;;tat0d that .:~taff had requested ;::'OStponement of
:tem #10, because of a ~ailin~ ~iscrerancy, and determined
tl:<::.t th0l'c 1·!<.:.s rwbody lr. tl-<f.: aud:tence for that item.
>:G'IlIO~·J: Cor.1. C1audy, to ro::~trone ItE~J-:J 1/.10 ttntil the l\Teeting
o~' Auornt 27, J. ~)'.Ji;.
"-tr"1 1 P~t' • , 1 .• •J...;...41 PuzLlerl
(Co~. Koenitzer ~bsent)
/
A. lf1tter 1'ro:11 Dori l"l. Levitz askine to
m~a·be udded to. the calendar of August
• .. , , .··'' , I
Asnistant · Plannine Director Cowan acld~~d tirn.t . l.'"eia:rd to n proposed expansion of tht:) ·De >An.?-';). i •. ,.,'
Com. Dlaine decided that thi& woulibe d±scusaed of the neendu.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
>ir. Alan H. 'I'alboy, 71~91 Du:nas Dr1.ve, asked the' reason for·.ttie· si:;;ns at Dollinger and Kim that indicated no l"ir,r-ht turn between ·· 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., and observed that :$.twas already over..;,,'· crowded there. Ire questioned the continued need for the one-· way system in the ax•ea, in· view of the number of. t•esident3. behind K-Mart and since Jollymun school had·now·been closed~
... ', : .. ,
Assistant City En3ineer Whitten advised that th~ si3ns ~ould'bq/
re~oved the following day.
Com. Blaine explained the one-way system was to. discour•a.ge .. , ·· commuters who were tryj.ne t.o by-pass St;elJ.ine; o.nd ·.MoCl~llan~ >
Mr. Talboy wondered khy one of the left turn lanes had~bee~ r eliminated from Stelline to Stevens Creek, and complained abou.t the ciraumstances of receivine; a ticket there.~< · ·
. ~ ' ' \ : . . Traffic Sngineer Gri~e said the sisnal phasinG~on the
··.·.('
section had been changed, and the situation was being . :, Cor::. Gl.s.udy comr.rnnted that the City Counc:U we.3 Htakina; chane:;es to cake coramute travel on Stelline unattrative.
~r. Robert G. Krier, 7513 Leeds Avenue, had also received a
t!v~et. The police officer had told him there was a si5n, he said, but it could not be seen.
Com. Elaine suggested they should co to the traffic court.
PUBLIC. EE/\.l1ING3:
l. Application 7-U-69 of 8~EVE~S CREEK RANCH STABLES: PUBLIC
EEAHD:~.1 to consider revocation or modification of an cxistini.:; Use Permlt v:!'lich aJ.lows operation of a commercial
hor~1ebac k rid in:_: stable and EiiVIIW!::>:ENTAI.. HEVIZ';!: rrhe project ls catc~orically exempt, hence, no action is required. '!'he subject property is located on tbc east sitlc of ~tevens Canyon Road approximately 1,000 ft. south
of lUcardo noacl. Pirst !fearinr;; continued.
Co~. E:laine cxpl&ined that this Iten was bein3 continued for
po~cibly three meetincs, anci explained the circumstances. She
~llertetl the audience to the po3sibility that a telephone call
~isht be received later ln tl10 evenins that would cause an early adjournment ot the ~eetin~ to the Rancho Deep Cliffe si
;;~;~Vl;:;:~,;~:i;~'~;::::i:~~~'.~!:~i\~,~=~J'~i~~~~~~~~~~~~,~~i~~jl~~*f .. q_, ... .,,,, •. ,
?. • . Applicati•.::m 8-'X'M-76 (Revised) of BHENT LEE:: PUBLlC'J·.rl.c.ARl.?~a, >' to consider a chane;e in location or'.tiel.e.tion or :a.~:p'~(le'~1f1':'.fan\t~ and equestrj.an easemfmt through Lots 7 and .8 ot 1!11~agt~:;599.o;;;{} ..
ENVIRO:'IMEN'.t'AL REVIEW: The' project WA1:1 pr.eVi9UE;ilY 4as~.l:!S,~d,J :.·';, hence, no action :ts necessary. The subj act ·pro~r,;~;:fs,1< >'<'. :":< located at the southerly terminus of. Rainbow. Drive~ F'iret ·· · · Hear1nc continued. Tentative City Council hearin~ date ~
All!,:;USt 20, 198lt,
' ' '
Assistant Planninr; Di.rector Cowe.11 su1runari:;;ed that. the item:: had been continued from the Meeting' of June 25, 1984 becauae,the Comni ssion had determ:l.ned that a trail sho1.-.ld remain, and. that the primary impetus now was pedestrian. He described tha applicant's new plan, and said that Staff's opinion was that the trail shculd deviate several feet at some points, but. reco1mnended that the Commission· should approve the .concept and call fo~ more desiKn, but not set involved in that aspect. He confirmed that the trail would be maint;;\incd by a public ei1t:l.ty~
Con. Adams thought that if the trail went alone; the proprty line all the way there would' be less erosion problems,, so that !'ail~ ) · · · road ties mi3ht be used for the whole leneth. There was a shor~0 discussion on t:l1is approach. ., · · ·
' . -.
Mr. Brent Lee, the applicant, sav advantag~s and disadvantages to this approach, but pointed cut that the trail would .be less steep this way.
MOTION: Com. Claudy, to close the Public Hearine •.
~ECOND: Coc. Adru1s VOTE: Passed unanimously 5-0
A di~~ussion on maintenance or the trail ensued. It was discov-ered ttat the ~id Peninsula Open Space District had declined to ~aintairi the trail, because it was too far frrnn their area~ but lt w~s felt rea~0nable that the City should maintain it, since it was thought that it would be used mostly by City ~esident
;.;Q'l1 IC.J:J: Co:::. Glaucly, to recor:n:1end approval of Ar-plication
13-TY•i-'(6 (Hev:tsed) ot l~HY·:?Vi' L:.<:L:,,. as :nodified, subj e(:t
to the i'indinc;s cf t!"".e ~~to.ff Heport and the subeon-
G lt.:i:.d.on::; cf this Ee<:trinc, r:i.nd f.ltrrndhrcl conditions :L-1:, ar1c": l~ 1;ti<lt .s.r·provul in based on :::;x!1ibj.t nAu, first rev;s~on, hut if t~e City and the Applicant
~'.:;re<' to ;"t~t the tr:~::.: or~ the p2op1'ty ll:ne, that concert :'..::: q.y,r.•ovod) (J.n1l co:·1(.i.lt:ion 17 to read tl-:fat the precise
· i~ ··n···t·.,.,•· J.r1· i··r·+•··)·' or l"'0•1··'·1~1'c+-~ ·-~ r-'"O'llc1' L",,, ····1·--r·o·\1er1 (~-..L.~~.>· "., .... !,,,... ~ .i..,..l ......... 1 .. 4•.. ... ~ <.,,; J \:-it...'•"-t,.1.,.li.t. .. •:>,;,.1. ~ .• ....~ ~);-_}) ' .....
b? the ?t.:.t:~ic 1i".·or!,:·c J1.:1 cctor.
5-0
. , ;) . Apnl:tca.~ion 4-'1'1'·1-81~ of PE'.I1EH CMIJ:ARDA: 1rEN':t1A'.HVE SUB-. DIVI.3ION ?•lf\P to subdivitlo i:tpproximate;:ty· 1. 7 i:i.cres :f.n"t'o :;;ix pa.reels ram;inr; in i:...~zc ±'rem 8,J.00 sq. ft .•. to.22,500
uq. ft, and ENVIHONMENTAL REVI1:'.:W: 'l'he Envj.ronmental ... Beview Co:n:n1 ttee recommends the e;rantine of a Nec;ati ve .· .·
Dccla~ation. The subject property is locat~d on the south-west corner of For6st Avenue and North Blaney Avenue. First Hearing continued. Tentative City Council hear1ns. date -Aueust 20, 1984. ·
Assistant Plannine Director Cowan mentioned that the item had beeri ·· continued so that the applican~ could incorponate a public·. :;;treet, rather than a hammerhead. However, the. applicant f'elt. a public str•eet was. un.workable, he said,, and so ha<&.· subriiitted' a private street' wit~ a public right of way,tho~ehBtaff still~re~t there was l"oom for a public street, but r•ealizcd that it would· ·· take land Xrom the existinc property owner. ·
There was a discussion about the well on the prop~rty~ and whether' the County could restrict its use. It was determined by Staff ! that the CJunty probably could not restrict it if it was an asricultural well. ·
Peter Ca~arda,· 20030 Forest Avenue, the applicant, said he had offered the well to the City approximately eiaht years aeo, and . .· ' .· a~ that time it had not been acce,ted.
Marv Kirkeby, 7246 Sharon Drive, San Jose, the civil engineer, said t~e p~ivate street had now been widened four feet, which miBht well allow for parkinG on one side, and that there was now a standard t~rnaround. Their intent was to have the i~exib111ty of useable land in the lots rather than putt1nc it into the .· r;troet, he ::::1.:dd. He cor:tpared the <l::1ount ot land tl:at would be used in a public stree~ versus a private street on the property using an ovcrlhy. He wits of the opinion that the appearance would be
similar.
Com. Adam= requested to view the concept of the public street alone, anJ usked Staff if there were any sinilar streets of
t~is tyre !n~the City.
Assistant Flanninc Direc~or Cowan 8Hid there ~as no &imilar street in a Gincle fa~ily develop~cnt in the area.
Co~. Szabo wunted to know the renson for the flne, and determined with Sta~f that it wno fur access to the public street.
There was a discussion a private ·.stx•eet mie;ht . on a,publi.c at;r>E;!et •..... : . .;-·, -. :,:··~{;):I~~~~'.~:~J·~~'.t:·:;·::-!<:.·. . · :;_.:·./ ~~·: .. :.·;···.
th Cor.im:.t.~rnion tho~g!?t tha~ :: , .· . hav:tne the, .r1ac; , a!\:r,:ma;<:<m¢tit:'-,,~/i . . .· ·
. . . ·.·•::·•·,_,.,.;; .. :,::·: .. c·:'.<;;i)~;;}'.'.;j/::·.e;/>·'.'•i;:i;··· .. :,;J~~-,(;,'j.-_,~;··• ...
41scus.s1on. on'puhlic'. s:treet
p.ub~.ic ~md privat'e st,r~ets.
Com. Blaine felh thattth~·strips of land and ; were a waste and thought th~-s arrangemen.t for future subdivision of the 1arcer,lot~ an4, accepted. ·· ·
.. MO'l'ION: Co;n. Adrnns,,· to close the Public Heai•:tns. SECOND: Co~. Szabo
VOT~: Passed. unanimously
Com. Claudy said he cculd accept the flag l.ots and the.,pt~blfc .· . ct re et, but nl ternati vely would be w1111n(S to let the dedication.; of property for a street be laid out with the setback intruding into the house setback, but without fla~ lots in this case.
Com. Blaine did not see any reason for sidewallcs, and ae;r~ed w11;h ·· the 0oncept of a public street with the setback encroachin3:1ntor the ri3ht of way. · · ·~·
·.·,. ,'"'.: .,
Co1r., Koenitzer f'elt that thoue.;h full setbacks WE~re unnec~ssary~ he would like to sec a rolleJ curb and 5 ft. sidewalk~. ·
Com. Szabo cUd not have a preference, bui; thousbt sidewalks wer~ ·. ' unnecessary because of the absence of traffic. ;!
Con. Claudy estabJ.ished with Staff that the well was included in· the standard conditions.
r<r. Camarda informed the Commission that tr~ well was used e_very . day at several sites, and wanted the water ri~hts matter explained further. · ·
Com. Blaine deterc1ncd with Mr. Camarda that the well was used to water orchards, and was therefore aericultural.
Assistnnt City En3ineer Whitten thou~ht that in view of tSe · type of useaceJ the City and Mr. Camarda could nc~otiate a phase-out of the wetl river a pertod of time. He explained that the water richts would be dedicated tn the City.
l·iO'l'IO~J: Com. G1audy, to rec orr .. -nend approval or Applic'at1on
1!-'I'M-84, :rnbj ect to the f:tndinss of tlH~ Sta.Cf l~eport and the subconclusions of the Hearin~, with standard conditions 1-15; condition 16; condition 17 deleted;
con~ition 18 deleted; condition 19 deleted; new condition 17 insert&tl requiring that a public street be des~.z;ned to the s2.ti~;fnct:t.cn of th2 Cit:1 En~-:;inem.' and dedicated un~ that a mlnimu~ of 30 ft. of p~vin5 be !ncorrorated in the strcetJ ~1dcwalks a~e not
ncce::;~;<.,:r.':.: on the st::;>eet am: the layout be such that the existins house on lot G could encroach on the setback normally rc~~l~cd3 the houDe cay encroach into the .front ::;r:tL<:c;~ ~:"c·;, b:.J.t .:mGt be at least 20 ft. fror:l the
oute~ ectcc o: cu~b or sidewalk n.ter the sidewalko
~re inatalled; ~1th a new condition that an ncreemcnt be ~rawn up between the property owner and the City to allow well une for b~r1cultur~1 purposea.
' .Com. i Koen:ttzer Passed unnn:tmottsly
Com. Blaine announced thut tho on Agcust 20~ 1984.
4. Application 6-TM-84 of MAXINE DHUMMOND: MIP to subdivide approximately one acre int fou~
rang1n~ in size from 10,000 sq. ft. to 10.775 property is loc::~ted in a Rl-10 (Residential 10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) zonins district and . . ..
ENVIRON'i1ENTAL HlWIEW: '.rhe project is categorically exempt, hence no action is rEqu;tl'.•ed. The subject p1•oper.ty: is ·· · ·· located a.t 't}1e sot1tl1west terninttn of Car1nen ... ·rto<oi·d ·j.uS~ .. rio: .. th-·:'.·:;/:-·: -:i., <,, of Stevens.Creek Boulevard. First Hearine. Planning Comm:I.ssion has final approval.
Assistant Plannine; Director Cowan outlined the Sta.ff. Heport;· noti.ni.; that this wa$ c-. ·1~esubmitt<:1.l of a proposal l"'eceived in . 1980. He drew attention to the ract that there was a new.prop9sal~ to construct a common dr:tvewaj: alone; a proposed power easement·· '· · line to serve three of the lots, and explained the slop~ ease-:~ ment; wo.s necesary to allow for future g:::-adins of Stevens Creek DouJ.evard. He said that the-Central F'lre District prefer.red .to > have a hanmerhead installed for en:ereency purposes, because'· the.:r:Yt '.:i believed that the proposed a.rrangement would encoura~e parking;·.:~, ·.:·''>'.:'.
;>: .. ·,::'.{;\:: There was a question as to whether a particular tree would have ~~· to be removed; it was hot known at this time. · ~·· -,::·;·. ·.\ .... -''·,.
It was established that an existing driveway eoins out to~ Stevens Creek Boulevard was to have been closed in 1980, and tha~: it should now be closed. --
Assistaht Planrii~G riircctor Cowan explained why the proposal had been deferred.
There wos n discussion regardine power lines and easements. The Coi:n:-:issioners preferred that the power lines go underg::.."ound at . the time of construction.
Assistant City Eneineer Whitten described the practice of bondin~, tut aaid he would look into their request.
:-;cr.!1 Ic,\:: Cc:~:. !tcln.t~::., to ciose tf!c. Publ1c 1{ea::1 l:n(~·
~):::co.rD: Go;~~. CJ,audy
... /O'J..1 :.~: :"a2~·;0d. unc).r1i.r.1ou.3J.y
;:0·~;10::: ~on. t:ocnitzc::."', to app.::·ovc Applicatior~ 6-'l'I'I-8li with standard contlitions 1-15 and conditions 16-2~ of 3taff Me~o ~ith fin~ln~s as per the Staff Repart
<~nJ subconclu.~;Jons of the Eer!:.."i.r:.;:; •
.Sl~CO!'JD ! Com. Ad.ar:s
VO'l11~; : P~5ncd unanixously 5-0
!"inal dee is ion.
. '
·· · >;· .. '· : . .:: ·\,. · .... ·. ,:: ·. :·· •. ::·:_., :' '.<.·,:~·. :f;: .. ·~'.1:~i'.!~)/F~Y·~~·'.~~> . .,~. . ... J~;:;\:;N;~fc··~:;:""' 5. Applioation .... B~T.M-84 .• of ·. V.ALI.CO•.i:iARil:.J.: Li.L'!).~··''(~US$::\1.($.:i:;.:X,CAn.·;;;y;;,u0:;: HES'JJAURANr11}: : . '.'11ENTA'l1IVE PARCEL •. MAP t'6{';;_;utjCliv::Ec;f~;~{app,r:?.x:f~'::«y.~J.tt mately 5. 34 .acres into .three.· parcels.<t•angine;·''in,•;s.1~c:··from<·· ·1.19 +-·acx-es to 3,26 +-acree andEN'VlRQ1'W1E~{TA;l/'D3EVIE\4.:.: ~ ..
1l1he proS ect is ca-teeorically exempt,, 'h11:rice·,·. n·o.:.aotfori·.1's.· :.•:< r•equired. Tfae subject property is Iocated'ii1:,;,a/·p.•(PJ,ap.n,cd:S'; Development with conunercial, .office and:,r.eqr~ati9n •:1.nt.e,nt L·~··
zonin(~ d:tstrict on the southwest corner ot' Wol.fe' Ro~d •and.,,;;:;: P.runeridge Avenue. l''i:'st Hearinc;. Planning.<Cor.un:J.s.s::l'.pn •has final approval. · · · •· · ·
Assistant Plannine Directoi~ Cowan br•iefly outJ.ined the Staff. Report, and supposed that the reason for .the division was / financial. On the request of the Commissioners, he pointed out· the property lines, and when asked about access to parcel 3~ he explained that conditions of ap~roval 16 and 17 made it possible to have public access in the future.
There was a short discussion with re~ard to the access and tha applicant was called.
Charles Newman, Director of Fi.eal Estate for Vallco Park, stated that the purpose of the application was to create financing the Rusty Pe.11can Hestaurant. He said that the a.cce.s;:;. road the r.es~~:.t;tr:an't would later be developed. . · ', ...
MOTION: Com. Koenitzer, to close the Public Hearing. SECOND: Com. Szabo VOTE: Passed unanimously 5~0
MO'l'ION: Com. CJ.audy, for approval of Application g-'l'M-84, · ··. ',' subj ec.:t to standard cor.ditions 1-15, and renumbered C'.on
·"~;::;nct~o.11sl~l.6 ,17 1 and 18 . as pet the Sta,ff H~port. SECOND: Ccrn. Koenitzer VO'l'E: Passed mrra:rrimo::t.fu)y 5-0 ., ... ., ...........
F1nal decision.
6. l\ppJ.icD t j.on 9-'fi·1-84 of CUPSH'l'INO utGON SCHOOL DIS'l~HICT (.JOLLY:;iJ\J: EL~~;,1:-;;t;t'l1 AHY SCHOOL): 1DEN'l'A'l'J:VE SUBDIVISION MAP to subdivide approx1nately 10.25 acres in€o 19 residential
ra~ccl~ rancinc in size from 6>oco sq. rt. to 10,000 sq. ft. ~n~ onP percel concistins of 6.2 +-acres for a future
r r; 2z c=d t c D.nci :-:;;JVIE.o;:i·IEI·J'J.'M, H:?.VIC 11,': 'l'he Envirom:iental H.eview
CoL':r:,1t.tee ::'cc01:.:r.end.s t};e :.:_;:::•c.ntJnr.; of a lfoe~ative Declaration.
J\r:;:-·rcxi.rw.tel;,r rou::: acres a:!'.'f; zoned :n-6 (P.es1d2ntlal S:l.ni;o;le
;~;~;·:i.:.~', ( ~ OCO ri:-i. ft. ni:-ti:r;u:·!) lot si7.e) ·anc.':. the re:nainin,3 (.2 ccrc~ nre zonetl PR (Fark::; and llecreation). The subject
~:1.>0::-:,c rt y :: t> 1oc at ed on t :'le fo:i.•mer ,Jo l1y;·~:.:~n EJ.m:wntary ~::chool Gite, cast of Jolly~an Park, north of Hcatherwood Drive and
:tt tr:E: 11;c:3tcrn te::.~:~.:l.nu.~ of DeFor;; Drive, ~lur:1as Drive and De
L<:t F<<:trce ;)::.•ivc. F:tr>::;t Lif«L!."'1nc;. '1\mtativc Cit;y Council hear!nc date -Au~ust 20, 19(~.
. e
~~~;.~~~0 !~~1~~~~~1~~~th;0{rarr1c ··.:~~1 il!i~f.f ~f ?~~!~~~f;~~~~:~Jif~ff l{~~~~~j He explained that.circuitous traffic :routes weI•:e. b~.in{:t'.·;e9ush~·,!"/!/;'(;'.~; ;'<r·' " and described. the two alternatives,,. A <1nd. B, tp .be;:j.~.~y;~~~~q_;~.{t-/;:::t·~·/~,? On tbe request of the Commisa:.ton, ·.be. explained :h9\,1;·4g9 .. ~;q;l_l}.,~p~,;g:t\~ r' '.::r:·:;;:); be e;ained to t1nv·loes)and'.'.oa;J;q.. that the· farks and.::R.~cre.at~9n.j();'Y<NJ .. tt:,;'c:)/;/ commission would be involved with the matter of parking~'.:fqi;':'p;;:·::;,~,:;:::;\'>:";:Z'.)> ·· the pa1~k when the exact use of the ptirl<" had .. been defined.~'< · ·· ·. ,.,:'\/;:> .· ..
John Hauptman, '( l16~r Defoe had seen a map with ~ef6e development,, and this did be used, he said.
' . --.;·. . ' _,·.-'-:;-'·'·"
Drive, was concerned abou~··ac'ces~~ .. He. < Drtve beine the pri1ri'1.'ry entrance >to t~e ·. not seem loe;io.a.l when Boll1ne.:e1~ could:); ...
' -~''. .' ..
Dob Edmiston, representine; the Cupertino Union School D:if3t.riot~; · said they were relyine on the j ude;enient of' City Staff .to help: · · them set the site developed. ~" .
Ed Jauch, 10760 3outh Stelli~e Road, said his pr9pe~ty ~~s ···~ directly affected by the development. He was worried about his access t;(> anJ fro:r. Stelling, and had illustrated his al:"guments
by markinc up copies of proposals A anJ B in orange •. :H~ described. his own :ldea of a cil"cuitou9 .route for the area whic.h·waa a· . .:!r.>n1bination of proposals A and B. · He was not ·interested :.in · ,,,;, · deveJ.or;ing M.s land, he sa.id, and used 1t fol."' ac;ricultu,\aJ;: . , · pu.rposer.i and it was a benef':'.' to the comr:mnity. He reque~t~d that the hammerhead that al'~-cted his prope1•ty bee :pems·ved. · ·
('·. ',' ; .
Com. Ada.ms wanted Mr. Jauch' s opinion on the \<ia-;r the,x•o8.:d sy~tem" should be developed to be of use in years to come'.· .'. ·, > · · · · · .,''·'
'' . .. .. · .: '". "" ', . 4 '
~r. Jnuch pointed out that on Map B there was a street delineatea
by a dotted line that wou.ld knock out his caraee. He observed thnt his idea would ~erve the n~ishbo~hood and not the Sara~osa Commuters.
It was deter~ined with Staff that the dotted line street alignment
in this instance was not definitive.
Com. Claudy pointed out that what was beins considered was continu1nc Du~as into an ~L'' stopping at the Jauch property and
continuin~ into a culdesac~ and that though it would be recorded with ~ culdes~c, the roa~ might never be closed.
l~rs. inuch ~elt their p~ope~ty rlshte were beins taken nway, and desc:::'Hiccl tbc 11 harrass:':ent" the.Y had :;;one throush f'or the past three years, havins to attend all City Council and Planning
Conu~ission J:;eeti.n[:t> per".:c..i::in~: tc the :..:rea, slnce they felt their rropcrty wouJ.c.i eventually be an :l.sJ.a.ncl if' they :..et cve:~;·ythin.:;
'0 Cc~. Claudy did not think u rand ~ould be put throuch unless the
,J<::uch p::.'01«~2t~· dFvclor~cJ., <tt t:Mcli tb1<c~ thcx·e wouJ.c'! have to be
hCCf..'SS.
John Nanz~no, 10716 ~outt CtellinG Road, said he had lived eighteen years on Stclli~c with the threat of Bo111neer going . th:r•ou5h his hous~i.. !re wanted· to develop his propex•ty JI he. sa11;1 . .'; ./: ·, . . .. but was surrounded o~r constant ha.m'."assm.ants and anri9yan.~eS:>:bY:~ ';'..\0 ',;~:S~< .... ;,, :.'.: • :~Taucb. He _f~lt there was no •. threat (of'. a· roE~d ,su;rpo,u.no:t..~ ,-i,,?'~t. ·\q~;:::i•'•,' N'{:·:~··;·i~~-,,~,C;).~~-l:.' .. S. ... ·p,r,0p~X'r.Y,;·,~·-Phe.·!)l,an .• ~.a.s,,,r.9,':)~tY.~f:t~!:.t~~,~f~;.g:;~',~~~~R~~E.:" ~~:i,f~.;,:;:::~ii~f
. , , i f' . ,: \~ :t: :'.'' '. .· i~'&,:.ti!J(t , ii•i,: 'i ' ... ,,
Kopcych;,·; 1028 · 'l'uscai 0 ~1·aci'e, l'··s'td.(L.that ,,cl{,be~lH· .... ··.road ·~.'l.ro~md .. ,the' :·:park,•. ·and)wante:d <:t.o 'pet·i.t'i'.BPl~\i~ .:.~; land itself be eat;ablished r:L.r,st, sine~ ottier:\l.'.~,~~';:';t:t1e;
·be roads ever:wher:}: /\··:.,.,\ :.>.'· ,f ./ .. ;•.· ... ··'· ·«<:. ;,: .. :,,:r,r'/,?;:;:;;)N!i:i~i~gL
Com. Bla:tne . o.e.aul.'ed ·him· ·that. though· t'he' 'C:tty:.'t:r;ofe'~·1~. · ...... · •.. · .. rond.s a.round i'1J.rks· foz• surveilliince and safety)'p~ri:>~:a.:e'.~'}ti.t.h~Y,;i:)'. wez•e not absolutely necessary.· · · · '·~·.::;:_?'F:<·'f:,>(:~· .... '·i.'tNC
Hev. Nichuel Hohuk, Pastor of Hedeerner Lutheran Oh~·rok1:1 Stei'i'.i1 ci:;j·h'.>
Hoad, 1.'lc.ts concerned with the bacl{ portion of the churcl1/Pi"OPe.,!'tY·)/' · that could be later u.sed for• development of· a chu:roh';!'api11.ty< · '·'' · o:t• subdi vi clod. 'l'hf:y wel?c concerned abou·t the street:Lconfi~U.~~ ,,>;\{! ,' at ions, which mie;ht or mizht not be an advantage to' t}?.enL\ :'('. ·.: Ifo just wanted to make their concerns and inte:i:•.ests known; ;he~:.;~ . ··· ·' .. ' said. · • . · · ·· ··· · ' · ·· ,., ··~.-.:·<'.
David N. McCulloch, 7459 De La lt!ittai;:e D:r:tve, was coi1de1~r~~d a.bo~~·: .... ~'.J.:'..[.·~i:·':< .· tbe location of the park property lines,· the hammel".on Dumas}a "'.'.:1. , the trai"i'ic on Kim. He thoue;ht there m1e.;ht· be.·two'.ways t:o.cmak ;; a circuitous i•oute up to Stell:l.ne;. . .. . .•. :: <··,':'' ·\.,•,\r•'.·i>H;.
•• -• • -_.·_. • , __ ,-•• • : •• _ •7·:>~.Y:ltF:'.t:Li ···:. -. The sue;~estion of waiting to sef~. the parl< placed was .d:tscussed:, ./::<;t':. , l5:y t;hc Conunission. Jt was decided .this wou.ld: be 'L;tnneoess'ary, '.'.' <~\n'~\::W:<.;, since a special road probably would n'ot be needed •. ·It .:was· .. ·.. · · -~. ':s 5f: fcl t that Bollincel' would .not so throur.;h, and that a ·circuitoµ. ·• "' ;: : " route snould be laid out that would provide a visuar access to the park. · ... ,:,_.;:-'!'·;.' '·::·~,·~: ;--.; : . -·, . J ! : . .' : . . , -~ ; -Com. K<.1enitzer s~i.:;sested that the f..lricl'l'.):'~ owners on.,.ste;tlirig.·~ :.ro11yw.rn Lane could develor1 their own culdesac. · : \',':, , . > ', ,< -·-. :·\:::/-,:·
Discussing alternu.tive A, the Commission felt that it. wov.ldbe.
,i."•:"'l·:ferable. It 1.tlso precluded takin~ the church prope];>ty· 4ridL
e;oin~ throuc;h the north and west of Boll1ne;e1", ~· · , , ;·~ J·'·
It was cstabl!Dhed that if the Jauchs wanted to develop, :theiS .
• ;ou1d ui.E· EoJ.lin.::;er, and 1;hat the people to the west off ;:tclJ.ine; would iiave to bul.ld a culdesac off .Stellin~, . so that Lollincer would not Go throu5h.
:;o'l'IO:-;: Com. Claur.ly, to close the Pub1ic Hea.r'ine
:·iO':L'IO:~: Ccm. GlcJ.Uc~y, to :::ec<.v:J.:::1end the z,rantins of a Necat:Lve
D c c 1 ~u· <t t :t on .
~Eco~n: c~1. Koenitze~
't"l(~'I'~~: Fa::.:scd 1!11a.r1i:.,~ounly 5-0
[~r::co!.JI):
irr~ 'J'F'. \' ,.J _ .. ,, •
r~on. J·~o c nit:: er~ to :::·c'c O!:;;i:end Ct}T!'ov <.:J. oi' A;;:,plicat\'.ton>
9-T~-84 w!tl1 standard condltionE 1-15, ~ondition 16 to ::.'!;'.·ad that 2r·;:.;;:•ovc:i1 w<.ts bused on Exhj.bit"Ai' ot' the Arrlication, with find1ncs cs set forth 1~ the Staff Herort und s?..:bc:oncli:sions of tliis HN-trinc;.
Gor:1. Ac!:.'1.:ns .Pasaed unani~ously
, . -' •. . . . , . ,, .• '·:.· (;:i,'·1:·/·;::: }~, ~ •. ':~;)/·:~:::t.:(:f);;~'.':j,:'.;;gUJ};;:: ,; >J::' }/,1~ · .. · ..... ·.· . "" ,,, ''"' ~· "'
Mo'l;!Cj~~ :. · com. ·.c:L~uo§~ ~ .. {~:. s<ln1:1':.a. Mitllur.etl' onozR to ·.c:tti>~.counc:f,1 that :Lf' a ·th::•oua.;h ro~1.d is ·aet\~m:tn'ed, to ':~'l'i··'..~~q'~:~fi!\itr~;;r~,.::
:::~l:::a1~~:;~~1S~'.;:~~~:::'.:k I:::P::::~ <.::w:;:;~:i11"~lt!llt~:ti;~%j~!i} ..
cil on Aue;ust 20,, 1984. .· . ·· ' · .· '<\ •'.': ~;. ··}~!{~·;;~:\;f:; ..
7. Application lID-Tr.t-84 of CUPER'l'INO UNION SCHOOt, D:rsr.CRIC~ / '.''.)'.:' (HOOVEH ELEMEN'l'ARY. SCHOO!,): TENTN.rIVE SUBDIVISION MAP .. to. .·. ;':? .. subdivide approximatel~r 11 acres into 27 residentiaJY>.< / :\: ,, · parcels rang:!.ne; 1.n size from 6, 000 sq. ft. to 8,,500 ·scr~i <· '.''''?' ~,; ;::-.rt. and one parcel consist in:;; of 5+-acres' for a. tutu.re. . .. ~'.{A,./<'
parV sit;e and E!NIHOlJMEN~L'AL REVIEW: '.l'he Envir•onmenta.l '. '''".\ Review Committee recor:unends the r:;rant1ne; of a Negative ·. · · Decla.1"'ution. Approximately six acres are zoned Rl-6 . (Reuident ial Sinr:;le-farn:tly, 6, 000 sq. ft. minimum lot . . . s!ze) and .fi.vc acres are zoned PH ·(Parks and Recrea'c:ion)·, . ·
The subject property is located on the tormer•Hoover Slementnry School site, north or Barnhart Place between
?~imrcse Way and Aster Lane. First Hearing. Tentative City Council hearine date -August 20, 1984. · ·
Assistant Plar1nine; DJ.rector Cowan described the Sta:r Her~0r-t und th~ t~b.alternat1ves A'and B, explaining that there were advantages and disadvantages to each. Ee said that some people did not want a loop roa~,as in alternative ft, because of reckless ..
drivinc problems, but Staff felt this approach was best •. The . park land was to retain t~~ existing tu~f a~ea, he said; and ,~ would be prim&rily llsed fol.' group play act:l.vities, 'and Staff felt it was unnecensal"'~t to install 1ar£;e ar:iounts o•f parking ·that would take awcy from this turf area. It was also felt by .
lsta.f1' thut a sinc;2e story dwellinc; restriction was unwarranted,
he concluded.
Cc::. Blninc wanted peo~le in the a~ea to be aware that parking
~c~:~ b~ do~n the streets.
Com. :1audy establisbed·with Assi~tant Flannlns Director Cowan
that tho~1:-;bt had l.lecn ::,iven to a double elone;ated culciesac
arr~aL~~. a~ hhd l;e~n used at Menorial Park, but there four-wheel
Cr~vc v~ticlcs hhd been nblc to so over the~.
D~vE '.'.!1~~er, 75:? ~atcrford nrlve, suict the ncichborhooJ had
o;:•:'..:;i;:<:1 ll:i \)(;(;!'! loohir.;:: ;:'er t.r:C' or0n :ir<:.~cc, ~rnd that parkinu; huJ teen avcrlco%ed. They did not want p~~kinc down the streets,
u~i ~e thou~ht a tri~le culJesac arpronch would Eive additional
v.:!..s:..:;:12. C.:tcce~;s, ~:e 1llu~~tra.tec..1 !:is Jdec1r i\.>1." tbc Go;:!:~1Jnslon.
' D:.:.:r·:.: :;:,,rtocs, 7·:~1.f:· Lcec::; /.vc:--J.:.c, :.:.:t:=;.tcd tI.;nt his propcvpyi:Labµ1f.:b<;;\q)
thi:: ~€W dcvEJ.o::-ir::e:.L :.:.nJ ~:,t.vc rad:;-.1.:~cs that he had prepared to the 8o;:in:iG::d.oncrr~. ::-re ;,"dclrc~,seo: the concern::; of pi.::'king, visual
acc;.:i::.~: :.incl thr-ro"rdll:;11ty or )'-,;:,,v·ir •. :::; s~.n:;,:le sto:t·y z.oninc;, and in th&t r0srect, drew attention to wtat he felt w~s a similar c~se,
Yl • ' '' . '.·
. . . . . .. ~,:::·:;i;·%1~;%;:W:;:n:;;~;3;:r::n:~1~~~it;/i:~t<8~: .. ,~,, ... · .. ·Vi,\'._('.!\'!:;\ ..
aubdivisi·:ai:, wheresint'.;le·.st'd:t~y-zonfrig·~had ·\.,';> .. ,\ ... +.4'46· : been support by Directo1:• of Planning and Developfo~1~tr::'Sisk ;· "r:a6~ 11 in .:11980, he na.:td. Ifo feJ.!; 1.t would: be necessa?,"'y to 'lpcate. _1 ,. ,, •.• addj,tional park1nz, uml s_11l;.~p,ste.d ·.·the~e.; cou;t4;jie>· .. s~m~<i9h \('.;,:::;~,,·.·;i; Wi:l~71~~·:>_._. ·
I.~arr,hardt and ;r,eeds. To :~:uustrr,ite hlif. ~qnce~?lf>·::9l'l'l!:~·nz.le.:\l:l~·c>l·~:f/f!~f~;;(···· ::."estr:tctions tir1d v!suo.l a;~ceas bettel•.11 h~ dl•e.;'I, :tht;?:i~:a.tJent~on,. :~!·~;:?::.. to a photoc;ra.ph in the pa,.:~ket s of a view from·;.the'.windo\<i on ·751~( ''..·• Leeds. In C'-:>ricl~sion, he added thfit there. was a :)ossibil:t ty o · ·
D. boundary l:tne adj ustmen\;, and wanted the· op port unity f'or th~ '··· · neic;hbors. to buy the avi':dlable land to add to their homes·•· ·
\ " . ', .. . ·'·-·
Cfa1.1:Ule Woods,,' 1606 Pr:tnu~ose v:ay, supported ;;1r. I!art<:>d~i' ~rid add.eel that the: area betwee11 Leeds and Donegal was pr.esently '11 a race track.
Christine McKinley, 7517 Donesul Drive had the experienoc;of ·~ car coming t.hroue;h the f'ence ancl alr.:iost into her family i~oom, ·;"
c;o suppo.r•ted the culdesac approach. W.tth :i:.•ee;ard tc -parking, \ she had never had a, p:-oblcm, she. sa.id, btlt supported :nr. Hartogs with regard to single story dwellincs, und did not thin!: surveil-lance or the sbbool area would be a problem. She also want~4 the. opportunity of rurchasinc; extra land. · . >j
Nr. Ha:::-toe;s stat eel that he was to have a meetine w:U.:h the. Schq District later in the week to discuss lot boundary adjustments
Lindo. Kf.:ilers, 7518 Leeds ~.venue, inquj.red the customary park;L
r~tio for parks, as she thvueht there should b~ some guideline• It seemed ~o her that bu1ld~nc a road to serve as a parking,1o was an ex;:ensiye :rroposition .
2ob Etlmiston, Cupertino Union Sch~ol District, said that the
11 race tracJ.::11 traffic would be elim.:.nated, but poir1ted out the
view the 1·101..wf's had was cont;.rolled. b;; the tall trees, and many er the houses udj~c~nt to the pa~k wer~ one story.
Com. hdu8s felt that not be1nc able to ,ut new two story houseE
ir: th:: D.rea cou::.:l :na..l\c S('.10G prJ.ce. s .t'~.11.
Co::1. Cla.i.:.dy ~ reeiliz1r1e.; thP.t there was no master.• p:tan;f':Ocsr·~:£.fie. purk site~ did not want &mBnities left out.
Shriotine ~c~lnley sui~
r 1 ct~.t. roe~::~~, etc., =.~1J1ce . ' j_.i"i c :._"Jt_~ ,-,;.. ;,; t __ ; < l
!Jhe d.~c:i
t~e..Cfic
not
... , ....., rJ
;.~· • .I. .........
want to nee picnic tablcnJ
?a~king prob~cms would be
~o::. 21ainc Jld not believe there wus ~ rurkin~ ratio for parl G,
~nd ~uc~ticne~ A~s~stant Plannin~ Director Cowan, who believed
thc.~t ~~~eve ~~1 0:::2.~.nc of tr~c l"'~-!~~l-:t: fanC: =-~ecreatton Jepart:nent \voul have tt!s kno~led:c, L~d un~c~took ~o c~eck on this matter wlt'
L 3.:::.
'l1ht:: a.~peet 01"' J..J.r.~itJ~l·i~; the •.lcvclop~·:1c11t to 0~1c stor~l 'iAras d1scuseeC, but since there ~ere alre~dy two story houses in the
HT'C"<.!, it v:.:i..!) ;."i:~lt not to 11 c i'aiJ....,. :·~0:·1cv"e.rJ 011 GOJ'i1e lot::~, the
C01x~iss!on felt> the house~ coulJ be s~ecinlly desi~ned to GiV a one story aprearanc~ .
. "
Tho re was . a 4¥:cudib~ i~~ ·~~1~Z~~?t,~iti{~~:~'~j·~~(i~~~~· .~~ll,U would be, better,; C:l.nd: • .it .. was'' gen~I~ally. i'elt' b_y,\~h~t:::pp~:k~!.~·tBH~~ that the loop system would, give less tr~ffi'o. problems'/~nd·\:::';;:r/«:,, · ' · , ' · · ~ -. -· . -·. ·. · . .~ , .-.· '.:.. .'·-. ". -•:·'," .·.,,l ,I'·'.·'"·-".' 1;-}'i-~, · :-' /'. ·.:i "'-:\ /''-').•;,
better surveilla11ce op~ortunit:i~s •. ·. . . ~·.~· .. -.·. ··.:'. :.')·"'_i~:1 w-,;~fi)i'J:).'\~~:".l;f,.~:~~/:tt'.:"''' .;:.:;;.··
Com. Koenitzer thoueh~· ·the. '_'ract~ 'track'' problem wqu~.d.·qim1n~,t1~;;:;W .:N.'.:i~·\XO':} when the area was pnvf~d ani::l pol:lce1 protection· would•.tp1 e;/t>.~t~~r,,~;:,1~.·;;:<i~li'l'~N5!~:;~·: .'
. ~ .· ' ,··<: '-'>"< ''.'.<~·, ·. " ::·.~';: -__ ;•:·"?~·~-~-·~::~,''. ··.~<-' .:·
Co:n. Claudy stated thnt the lssue of the School District'. sel:liris·:'~;it\{ : off pieces of the property to current homeowners had to be •. , · ::>t;,, · ,: acreed before uobmittine a Final Map. ·~· m; s ~~n~. ~l~~~i~~n~l~~c 1~r 0 c~~~~y~~~:rr~~t ;~~ t o~ep=~~;d a~~t ./,(t;'. .
said there would be competition with the City for the 'land. \,:
~ • :' c. -, .'
t'iO'r IOlt:
s::::co~~·o:
VO'l'E:
f·lO'l'ION:
SECOND:
VO'fi~:
MO'l'ION:
SECOND: VO'r;.::
A~1i!~1·JD-..
l•JEN'l' '.i:'O mD 1l1 I 0 K :
Cow. Adams, to close the Publ:tc Het:trine;. Co;:l. Koen:U;zer Passed unanimously
Com. Cle.uuy, to recommend the a;rantine of a Declaration. Go1r.. Koen:!. t; zeJ::>
Pa~sed unanimously
Corn. 1.\dar.Js, tc:i recommend approval of 10-TM-8li with standard conditions 1-15~ and ~ondition 16 that ... approval, was based on Exhibit "A", subject t.o the .. findings or the Hearine and the subconclusicins o~ the Starr Report. Com. Szabo Passed unanimously
Com. Jzabo, to ~dd condition 17, that on lots 27,1~,15
D.ml 1, •~re hi tee tu re will' be approved by H Control ttt\·;:~ .. give a one-story appearance. · ~~
Gorn. C_luud.J'
Passed ur·1r!nir~ously
Co~. Blaine announced that the item wouij be heard by City Council
on A~~ust 20, 1984.
~O~IO!!: Con. Claudy, to continue Ite~ #9, Applications 12-U-84
Lrnd '1-'l':.:-8Li to the :.;<>:et:~:ic; of Jrn:~ust 15, 1924.
E.
Passed unani~ously 5-0
.1\ p pl i ca. t 1 or~ 11-'J.\'··:--e :; of l~ I c::AHD A~,~I't G.!'~A UD II\. G tJ~: iYlP1o1J: 1l1 E~~1i~A '!'I'VE;
P !\ r:~c;.:!~ ;·~;f\ l' to :Jut;.. .. !!\~ i \.t e u.p~J rox 1:!1a t (~ 1y J.. • 2 t: ac r~s into f'Otll~
r·C:~l."'Cf-'1~.; .rt~nc..:in~~ .tr~ ::1:zc 1·ror·1 l~~,li50 C1:·1. ft. t;o 17,600 SCJ. ft.
t.r!G. ::i~·\fIY~D:,:~~l:·.~~!~rA.! .. I~:~~'f,./I?:~·,': '2~·:c ~'.~!lvircru::entul 1{r:Yv1evy·
Corr;r:iittce reco:ri..-:-:en,i:s the ~·;r<>.ntinc: of a :re~~;ative Declaro.tion. The subject property is located in a R~S (Residential, Hill-side) zoninc district at the westerly te~~inus of Poppy Drive
wc;::;t of' ::·'oothil:! ~'ouJ.cvard. ~'ir~;t iie<;~':i.n.:;. Plunnine;
Co;r.u110~3:Lor1 b~s ~f·:t.r1:.t.l c:.pr~:c'ov.;~l.
. : ·. ·····•·••···) . : :·.: · ' : L:~, '.:1f f ··if :r:::B':.·;· :1·'n1'f Ji";:'£f ;');::;f 1}i~~.'~?t, 1f~.~lY;·,~1'~~1 ,,.,1;.... •. . ...
i~aarmer I P1aseck1 e~pla+ned. thati' th~'s:.Applicat!o~·.~;hl.1'.et'.iY,tr~~n"t .. . ... app.i:•oved in 1980 r.md had: been .. allowed. to expJt'e .: :::::': :· .. :.<.·\>"\•'/i:_;;>\~'·':! lj,~
::;;0;~:1::.:~~:: :::~~ t:~:::::·::.=;::l:; ~!S~i~~~·~1,ltill~~i :····
~ECOND: Com. Szabo . . . ..
V0'11E: Passed unanimously 5'.'."'0
MOTION: Con. Claudy, to approve a Ne~ative Deolar~t~on DEcmm: Corn. Koenitzer
VO~E: PasseJ unanimously
~O~ION: Co~. Clnudy t~ approve Application ll-TM-84j . subject to th £1nd1ngs of the Staff Report and standard conditions 1-15, and renumbered . conditions 16, 17 and 18 or the Staff Report.
~ECO~D: Coe. Koenitzer VOTE: Passed unani~ously
F'lna1 hca.t'.1nc;.
Adjournment 11:40 p.~. until ~ednesday, August 15, 1984
. D~r"~t~}/ C~rne~
City Clerk
'"
Approved:
Sharon Blaine
Chairperson