Loading...
Reso 6715 , ' � ASA-2012-13 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6715 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF 11,610 SQUARE FEET OF EXISTING COMMERCIAL SPACE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF 15,377 SQUARE FEET OF NEW COMMERCIAL SPACE CONSISTING OF TWO NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING PADS AND ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED AT 20803 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD AND 10033-10095 SAICH WAY SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ASA-2012-13 Applicant: Tom Purtell (Borelli Investment Co.) Property Owner: Diana Taylor Location: 20803 Stevens Creek Boulevard and 10033-10095 Saich Way (APNs 326-32-041 and 326-32-042, respectively) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Committee has recommended adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 19.168, Architectural and Site Review, of the Cupertino Municipal Code, the General Plan, any specific plan, zoning ordinances, applicable planned development permit, conditional use permits, variances, subdivision maps or other entitlements to use which regulate the subject property including, but not limited to, adherence to the following specific criteria: Resolution No.6715 ASA-2012-13 January 8,2013 a) Abrupt changes in building scale have been avoided. A gradual transition related to height and bulk has been achieved between new and existing buildings. b) Design harmony between new and existing buildings have been preserved and the materials, textures and colors of new buildings harmonize with adjacent development with design and color schemes, and with the future character of the neighborhood and purposes of the zone in which it is situated. The location, height and materials of walls, fencing, hedges and screen planting harmonize with adjacent development. Unsightly storage areas, utility installations and unsightly elements of parking lots have been concealed. Ground cover or various types of pavements have been used to prevent dust and erosion, and the unnecessary destruction of existing healthy trees have been avoided. Lighting for development is adequate to meet safety requirements as specified by the engineering and building departments, and shielding to adjoining property owners. c) The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of outdoor advertising signs and structures have been designed to minimize traffic hazard, positively affect the general appearance of the neighborhood and harmonize with adjacent development. d) This new development, not abutting an existing residential development, has been designed to protect residents from noise, traffic, light and visually intrusive effects by use of buffering, setbacks, landscaping, walls and other appropriate design measures. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the initial study, maps, facts, e�ibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 2 thereof,: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (Application no. EA-2012-09) is hereby adopted; and the application for an Architectural and Site Approval, Application no. ASA-2012-13 is hereby approved and that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. ASA-2012-13 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of january 8, 2013, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set dated December 14, 2012 consisting of 27 sheets labeled T1, A0, A1, A2, Building 1 Exterior Elevations, A3, Building 2 Exterior Elevations, A4, D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, M1, L-1, L-2, C-1, C-2, C-3, C-3.1, C-3.2, C-4, C-5, C-6, C-7, C-8, and Photometric Plan, entitled, "Saich Way, 20803 Stevens Creek Blvd., Cupertino, California, Borelli Investment Co." drawn by FCGA Architecture, Borrecco/Kilian & Associates, Inc., and HMH; except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. Resolution No.6715 ASA-2012-13 January 8,2013 2. ACCURACY OF PRO�ECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 3. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file nos. DP-2012-05 and TR-2012-41 shall be applicable to this approval. 4. FINAL BUILDING DESIGN T'he final building design and exterior treatment plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The Director of Community Development may approve additional designs or make minor variations as deemed appropriate. The final building exterior plan shall closely resemble the details shown on the original approved plans. Any exterior changes determined to be substantial by the Director of Community Development shall require a modification approval. 5. FRONTAGE DETAILS The final street frontage details, including, but not limited to sidewalk paving material and widths, tree grates, street furniture, landscaping and tree selection shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development prior to building permit issuance. Frontage details shall match or closely resemble existing materials in the "Crossroads" planning area. 6. FINAL LANDSCAPING PLAN The final landscaping plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The applicant shall work with staff on the following: a. Species and size selection b. Buffers at 16' deep parking stalls c. Screening of utility structures d. Design of on-street landscaping curb planters e. Providing a wider hardscape area to the south of Restaurant 5 for outdoor seating 7. INDEMNIFICATION To the extent permitted by law, the Applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void this ordinance or any permit or approval authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. 8. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and otller exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section Resolution No.6715 ASA-2012-13 January 8,2013 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of January, 2013, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California,by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chair Miller,Vice Chair Sun, Lee, Brownley NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Brophy ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONEIZS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: ,� ;'� l�� ���-_- `'3 Aarti Shrivastava Ma ' ill r, Chair Community Development Director Plannin ommission G:\Plannittg\PDREPORT\CCRES\2012\ASA-2012-13 res.doc