Loading...
PC 06-14-71 • b'j-$ ;6!4yia +!;Xg}ed.{ _"i1;:ii;`+-"iF~!•l�'h 'F' �'! .d�} Cyc,+,,,.eayS).�•,t.� �•ai,�-i•E•� , M., ttr: r ;k { t• FfilE{« , . r 4 3 ;A W", y`,S{�'7t S ,�}h �?f ' ,m ,d'�'� "i ` t eN,- t•. • t. { 1 n F���g��.r��l PC CITY OF CUPERTINU7 State of cal.ifornla, ,t( 10300 Torre Avenue';'Cupertirio'talifoirnli.'a ! ra141J�a aflpa9.i,�r,,r,l!ya,C +it it Telephone; 252.-4505 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION I r•,R CITY HALL1 JUt'.E 14` '1971•`IN:TIIEtiCOUNCTL CfIhMB. , '! 'CUPERTINO CALIF00IA' : ':. •I� ,IEt SALUTE TO THE FLAG The meeting was opened. at 8:01 P.M. by Chairman Irwin with the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Commissioners present:' .Buthenuth,"Hirshoii, Meyers,i�ruetz, ; Chairman Irwin Commissioners absent: None c; Staff present " ' Director of Planning: Sisk' '•City-"Attorney,.Adams'. c;... :r_ Civil Enl:.neer Akers Assistant 'P1'anner Coiaan .::I r :''• ';a;:;, Recording--'Secretary'Lois. Inwards'%',- APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes. of .lays 24', 1971 Commissioner -Meyers -noted -on page :12-„"secon8,;paragraph,)'the''i•':', citizen's name is •Mr. 'R'. Koenitzer,.' �',On _page :14; 'nextl:to.ithe;clast paragraph, it was 'the Planning Polic'7 Comm it t'ee',rather:-than the,6 Goals Co-,nmi t.tee that had met the previous` Wednesday.”"• = Moved by Commissioner Puetz, seconded byCommissioner Meyers ;tar:'; �iavu24s of approve the Minutes of May 24, '1971. :is corrected: ;approved as AYES; Commissioners Buthenuth, Meyers, Puetz, Chairman Irwin jcorrecLed NOES: None s` ABSTAINED: Commissioner Hirshon Motion carried,- 4-0-1 i POSTPONEMENTS: There were none. i WRITTEN COr1,N There were none.N1CATI0NS: �,•:,::;;,:, :�-•,,,•.:; ! OKAI. CO*IMUNICATIONS: There were none. c I ( f ,` R`u.4i r.., y :. � rr"•rs c e .:.`^ Y } _..r,:;.1 .iY'T-r�{ E,. �s� �s'1,;��rF•5'.- 7 :. x ?!"'r" y 'ltd a -.. � tt,�.tK+;:.,�s.�?.,�;`:� A$v'k!..::^s,t^'�` ' u�%tsa":hfn�`;,; °,ka;`' �' y v.._ .:ti�°c.�.aw::��'••> .a - �`"'" _._ _ ,nr• i},.6 13iii� M >`:,"�.:Fatf VA« �i.�� �t ,.a {'� {`) '� a� A 3 � 1' , s\ 1r�t �. `1y .S „ a. t+ •,_. t t.•. H t" f i,c l�+r,n'b9{d 1 .�c n �}I +' y, t ' .s. v�"tt'�tint.�T�W ��, INVA ar�r b7T a r\rw *p " i k 1 VbJ+ }�� j PC-35 Minutes of the Planning Comtnission4MQ&ting ,of;�June;yl4, 1971pt,�lC)�LYifkrt �cg` tp,17,� Page 2 ;}fi Ci f'{.�;(JT �° �.t,itrS� : at,yt. PUBLIC HEARINGS r t , ,i[ :.,:'':; :):;i 't'. ';i ,: •'CI �'i.l 4.„ 7 f it:i ' oii"i iCr 'txt14 TM t , 9-Z--71 1. Application 9-Z ,71:;of,Miehael :Mikul;;for_prezoning O,.,yt ante from{s� ta County ML (Light Industrial):.,to: CtytML' (Light Industrial) property is located adjacent to and westerly of Imperial Avenue,. , approximately 100 feet southerly of the intersection' of Granada Avenue and Imperial Avenue, and adjacent to and souther.ly.of Granada Avenue, approximately 30 feet westerly'•jofjjthe intersectiony4. , of Granada Avenv_ and Imperial Avenue. First Hearing. `'` '•;. ' Zoning The Planning Director said, in addition to the staff discussion wanted to point out that this property is in' the County and is in on 9-Z-71. annexation proceedings at the present: time. A Record of Survey map was placed on the board. Ocher visual aids presented were.,;a.;map,i ; showing existing zoning in the area, an aerial view and colored slides of the area. 'He said'this'proposal.;is;imi keeping,with, ,.he;;Monta,:Vista F plan established in 1969. ! ' 1 Roadway Commissioner Meyers asked if there would be roadway improvements at. improvements the time of de:vetopment.i r:.The; Planning', pirector said there;,would7rbe { roadway i.mprovemencs to Cupertino standards. Commissioner Puetz asked if'.they are going to put appropriate f,enc- ;AN ing between this property, and-tlie; r4sidential.* Director Sisk said this proposed building is essentially on the property line. It is in accordance with our setback requirements for ML zoning. The house is in an industrial ,zone., „ 1>i.i i "• .. ":'%t'iclF: Mr. �tikt.i].'s Mr. Michael Mikuls 21672 Granada Avenue, ;Monta...,EYJ La, -said ,was; statements tae applicant. I He said it:would• be: ,Worttt his .,whiJe to,,-reC�in fthe house for the present ,time..! •ii:is rplu7mbing, business „would,be. conf Arm- ing and the house would be non-confor,.Ung,..but ;he would .likeao• leave the house there until lie is in a position to develop that portion of the property. The Planning Director said;it .is. a pre-ex;isting,;non- conforming use and as long as there ,are no subsaantial, changes,.,to• the structure it is all right to leave it Chairman Irwin asked for comments from the audience. . There were- none. Public Moved by commissioner Meyers, seconded by commissioner Puetz to Hearings close the Public Hearings. closed Motion carried, 5-0 Co7lnty defer- Mr.. Mikul pointed out that he now has a deferment from the County for men;: on streets, gutters and sid aaal'.:s until. an assessment district: is... , street wo rk formed in that area. Tho Planning Director confirm ed 'this. All t t s �;•{^' to 1� i> �•'a' t � - „`�5� r. f;J' t+#,'3 ' � ]{y,t, �`y?�� ..�'`�, '�.5 '' fit`�r�:�s '`�'4-urd'c-�a�,u`��(y'ni.+cL�.��;��v' ''I' ..,.s �•.':.�. �i -_.,�/. �� ?L"1!_ku ;Ed.38�iC{iY'Y�i�lffi'.".Y� Y- ' 3i',S1 �kbA'A3irtRw�D�iili •� .- _ _ t•x••4+.i"Ul r'�,�'v�y„ey �X�u��4_:sn�t1`tt.k,,� ` rrriJ gpJy�1���? .. ,;j �.Fb'4�r �,ttt ,� �{1�{ a}C.. ;-i 1 L•. :4' ,1f1+'�'� +=.'0. rt �{�` �3`,[ r4 M{,� �' •1 !.�•�f�'f{�fy}' x 4b,��i fV'l ' ,,s. �V tT • {4j� ''±M.. 5, 4" % , :;J>..{I �d'�";4';,� 1""�: `i{^J s��'fi 1�,,Div�'. Y ��..�,f= > ..•�. H'N 3r.,,t ; '4^ ,� y?i ..} ,d�q,�.#y7`ytyEt }�• '' 1„til S ,y { 1{� }. ,rjanninp Cuc�mission 1`lectin of June 14, �f1471}4 itl(lUCl:i of .Ctl� ., t};gi,�. .(; ;,ift i t r."I: fr:' 2 " :it- ,.r c3,11! ,{j! 1 t ,t• ti P $®Lx3 ' �,ilU� J,t. Commissioner Buthenuth,asked the'-planning 1Director IJS he recouS art, ti }lo, conc.itions h i :.! attachedti•to mended any` conditions, should th'ir3 appTi'cmtion be:aptproved k�rfr r�r nJ,rr�,a , .l ,•_ Director Sisk said, after, d'iscunsionsF with the City At}toY)neyf }�+J z ningd��}4 X17..11 it was 'decided'tliey,were"rciot' going to'''condit`ionrzoni'`ngs �a�In' ithisle ,S i,`' and''the Architectural azShc case, we `wouid 'accep't' the�TenLat ve„Map ! "f tie Cit Atttorne 'laddedthat it Site Approval from the County. , Y, y i n e determined'r;1.,.: r�.) was his advice in zoning ma'tt'ers that t•m. at'b t whether or not the proposal'woul.d"be.a 'good ''use for"the"'pir'operty''''` ' and not condition the approval. . a i Moved by Commissioner Meyers; ,seconded'by comaiiGsioner;B::r, j,.':!iih t 9E Z-71 , ., approved to approve application 9-Z-71. 'i a 1 i h:.%q ,, r.,. > , AYES. ComnissionF.rs 'Buthenith, Hirshon', Meyers;' I'uetz`, 'Chairman'•!'' .E Irwin NOES. None Motion carried, 5-0 I w !i. 1Ji1.'.:I:i s.; MINU'iE ORDER Moved 'by Conmissioner;Meyers, seconded ily'Colraniss inner IIrshon 'to' 'Recommend City recoMnend the City Council; at the' time of 'annoxa,tionf specify r accept condi.tieas +i• f:Count the City accepts. the 'conditions 'of 'the' 7.entarive`Map and the Y Architectural and Site'Approval` of the t;ounty fi:I 4 AYES; Commissioners Buthenuth, IIirshon, Meycls,, 'Puetz), Chairman' i Irwin NOES. None Mot ion carried';':5'O Director Sisk said he will. check with. th,e County to see just what obligations the application has assumed'-via the County. . i 2. Application 10-Z-71 of City- of Cupertino' for:`prezoni'ng:'"` acres from County CG (General Comm ercial) ' to` City"CG !(General Commercial) ; 3.99 acres from County= R1-10 (Residential.- Single family 3.0,000 Sq, ft, lots) to City CG (General Commercial) ;; 8,47 acres from County R1-10 (ResidentialiSinglc-facr:ily { 10,000 sq. ft. lots) to City BQ (Quasi-;Public Buildings) ; and 3.76 acres from 'Coluaty R1-10 (Residential S,ing'le-family 10,000 sq. ft . :Lots) to City T (Transportation) Said perty, consisting of 18.35 acres in to;:al, •is located in' the": southwest corner of the intersection of ifomestead "and i ,. Stelling Roads. First hearing. 1 i 1 r 4 4•>» c ir4�}��"h. , c1" `'{r n- jM�t 3 YY-tw'.h+ dc�'4 F.' yy,, !!�•� w 1y)', 1 S 5�� j � t\. , tlµi Y,, 4C•A,h.L�P-' �'g' }i,t -`Y v �dt rt`3�btr "','1y14 t i,+xl? J2Mr�'i�i? i t 7 Litt r j r) y fr " ,, dY y, ,k..b a t±i " .5,, _ ^ .. , .. ....•' ,' a t..JIi s ir, K JI s 4 "t t ) I• s a, � 'fl; t i,'• -. r I ., ,.( }^• .,.,^.,J tl r I '�.:slr t a"1•p Iy��4C2��1i5��'y{'kr LST �;`§r '. }; PC-35 Minutes of the Planning`Commission Meet.tnig of June 14,E+1971; v ; �t+ n+�, ziF r q' tt Vage 4 ♦ 't ..)i, •', ')' ;r1.t' ,rl '.! ','f t':'1 i�:'ta.j fit:1n"triJ t),{ t 0l'!f'11%1" 10-`L-71 The Planning Director said,'air the,asst,Ciry, Cotinci] n^eeting, t41e I,' r.s rf (,: t3.i fi t J:, t r. ( l..i ic,�'. :.fi ,I C )' r .,. h J !Ii. T.,r.1. prezoning possibility of.rprezoning this entire.fpta,rc,el was considered anc� IL .discussion sont back eO t1'0 rPilanniag+Commissio4.f4)r, 'tiheir.tconsi'deia,ti:oci. n).:,r , MapsLShowing the:exist-ingfandipXoposed zoning and the;_existiigtIand use were .placed,:on the board .,The.,red ,ection, ;fronting on Homestead Road was proposed CG,.the middle, section ,a Quasi use, .and, the lower .sect=ion ,freeway and flood control. y1 f •, , .!„' a .arr_ st ,� :f; 7 •fi�: (S`rl q. � - .=! utr `i •1.`tC,'; a.}•� ''' )' M1.�;i';^.Y •.l f:(1 .t.f11Li ,'. Commissioner Hirshon asked what the pot-ential u for this property' i'vas,as,,,far,as.,the General Plan„is, .concf!rned..t Director;:Sisk noted`),,. there is an existing service station on ttie ,corner. It could be' r 1 -,._.l J.f developed into multiple family dwellings. However, the property owner, ..Mr.,•Jason• Chart ier.,, presently has,. Commercial.,zoning,•on the— property in the County. He•can go ahead with development_,in the' County because_ he has all the utilities;,. This matter was discussed at the LAGCO meeting.. i Applicant's Mr. .Jason Chartier, 1627 Hollenbeck 'Road.' Sunnyvale; said at this statements point they have the plans and are ready to construct an office complex: on parcel. C and a scuba.diving retail operation,tis,,readyr`'t.,. to build on parcel A. The reason they want to come .into` the.Cty, I t, this time is, the Architectural and Site ,Approval, control;one. all, three parcels. . His..business, will be in parcel, C and,the wants to protect. the quality of ,develo'pment„in all three. pa• c'&ls_. .r:H'e h'as,,aa road going back to parcel.;C. In addir_.on, Y G. & E . has a road= ; „ , , ;r. .,.r I!,.. uf... ..._.+-.1.. _,J1.= :)::'r: Y back to their property. r t., ,r• ..;-:' .'� i� ,. "ii irl.`: J ! `AYh. Chairman Irwin asked for comments frcm the audience... The.rej we're' none. Public Moved by Commissioner .Hirshon., seconded by Commissioner Meyers to Hearings close the Public Hearings. closed Motion carried, 5-0 :r i ;r, ji'ICiu Commissioner Hirshon commented, that, it. is roo bad. to s.ee ,additional iddit commercial property coming into the City, but,, on, the other,.hand, it is hard to see this property used as anything besides commercial or possibly professional offices. Commissioner Puetz .said he; is not in favor of strip commercial. ; Chairman Irwin reviewed the facts that there.is commerei'.1 across the street from this property and the large P.G'. & E. facility next to the c;lurch, which does not make it desirable cor'residential use. And they cannot overlook the fact: that this property 'crs,f be commercially developed right now under County juzisdirtion. ; i i i I - t r • . t': , R)-. �i ;fir.. 4 .11n�.',_. ., . t • ,,y�i"<kE..g'.Yr't'`'S��ljoa'k�`�'.fS�1 ' r. "'}��"t}t� d �,1"�'as t't � 8-� t�`. . at? �+r,(Y^ .;ry'atr'� -A AE�r,.. .� ` .,F°'�5., > t \� � y r ai '� i7, 1 yt t e �'•� ��,,t,,`r �y9' _ •: �" ' 7f ..�tj�'��r>,7y`�1) 'tt off,'{ha�� �r*�d �� h �3t1•,�+"�" '�q � tai' . �s,T�'�t'G� ' '�� r'.�>, i .+�� n.�t T '��4 fs rk aY� r� a ttan{t �,z�.�� 's`Ln f,' + w.t'yh•y ` �. 4 '� ,y .� ! T1� j ;, t ? 3 �..�.+. y.'A ,efa d y t -t r• - � ti ✓� S�P�a,n)r{ �1r�1> t2 r (S y� °n 4n. is t Y ,,i •'S rM1i�;�c,''�!S't,,\Sh' '2 t>�4,° �,.' t� Xtit 3���r°ar"'.3 f '` S o-'� a3 )ic•C�,t� f t°r. t _ t. ' , , n}�ti ii its,�• bs'�d'3'�t, i+. Plittu acs`Hof .JI'L" 1'l:sr41"IS ;Ceruriirision-•1`lc:ecing ;oi}.Jura� 14°ji�1971s.� turttl2h YC t35t�g f,,.LF `I , Commissioner Puetz proposed coasinarcialr forting: forothe ChartiertrrL �� PYapDs,�1`forr;, 'property and then' gorrto -'R-3� for fthe•>remdinder :of.:,the,;prtiperay.,iiii ' cvsnmerc rill i.r :' His 'reason) 3.s that',it ,i c;`easy to.:go' ihto;,.cpmmerc:UdV,ibu:t '?it,t w,ery and'=.R 3 difficult to go to, say, R-3 from commercial.! ; _,i:�-, ,rt:rr I, Commi.sa't'oner'+lii'rshon asked ;the -Planning Directorr.lris ;profes.s;ionall Planning opinion 'on this*'property,, whether R3,•would.-ibe!good',.zoning:;ilere•:;.: >• recommendation Originally, Directur;.Sisk' said he :did,not redommen'd .commercial here. If the County matter weren't .hanging,tover, his(head •;he would t' still not recommend commercial. here. It seems there will'be a commercial development in this area whether we want it or not. We have' the opportuni'L,y to' provide, sonnetiassurances'ithat.:`:the:;whole: area will be' tied 'togeE.her. i,; Moved by Commissioner Ilirshon, seconded by CommissionerrPuetz to 10-Z-71 deny application 10-Z-71.. dPr.ied AYES: ' Commissioners Hirs;cn, .Meyers, Puetz NOES. ' Commissioner Buthenuth, Chairman Irwin Motion carried, `3-2 •, i.., p Commis si.oner lEirshou felt that while there is commercial in the area there is*also-a;great deal of.mul't:.iple. in, the, ar'ea,: oHe, said f: we are''in need o re.sidenti.al in 'the:Ctty,.; fie, does; n y,! ot,1bu _ mr)tter that the f.cllow can develop; ,igh't,•now,:-in Lhe County,,,,,; Chairman Irwin said tae. might as' well. figure.•this,:piece: of-County,; ! property will be developed ri-ght­.now.i The Commission then reviewad the map, with the intcn,Lion;,ofr y !; ; •m Recap of making; a recommendation to the Council. They agreed that the opinions purple area (f reeway) was 'all right, as. spas ,the,;blue,•area,;(church and P.G. & E.) . The red area '(prupased. for General..Conrmercial),; was whcrc the diff.erenccs of opinion lay-,. Director,,Sisk ;said, the City of Cupertino has determined that anything south of Homestead could be 'under the sphere of influence of Cupertino, ,,QQrUT s,siouc Puthenut:ir said he couldn' t s':e breaking up-the .red ;area inLo.3.,.q hodhc-podpe of uses. It already has conr:nercial on a portion of , it (tile sel-vi.ce Moved by Commissioner. Hirshon, seconded by Commissioner Puetz. a.o Recommend recommend to Lha C.itle Council. the propel:ty presently zoned R1, R3 instead with 'the exception of the sea:vice Station be tuned U. of cor:Lnerc:Eal. tY • t,t AYE S, CorliniSSiOner', Ilirshon, Moyers, Puet:. \OI?S: Cumm.Lsslanc:rs liUChC:rruth, Chairman Irsr.'in .F ??oC.t.nn carr.i.ed 3-2 t 's r i,..*'�'..,l�,<�s�•;-� _ ir > tC ` t:.1LS' 1 (r t_ x� �'V+. 3q:i s, ,W"'r}„K��>y :i','' >kTil,f'• i X . � .{''.. i:1_l .'lS6'R""1.i7 d 'ts. �1 :. 0,„ •�` a+ 7 • , l: ✓e+� y�.0 yU2,� ti�!• ,7,_l:.n,t 1 a ����1 d��+ '�4*�'i"'�� ��+ � �w��, 11h ,r 7 � �s, h f� . ti,Ay y,,} �,tG��,4•Ei)'wt'Y.�,. ,:�4�{�.'(�r, s PC-35 ,of JuP m ne] lit, ;1971r��t�n•j,a�� �;I�'FU�N��,, Page 6 t t7 '.Y r�rr In aiYk�+ thy �e YT�t Comm. Meyers' Commissioner Meyers- wished t'o.:explai;ar his!cvotez g,idid„not3,seeanything opinion conducive;•to, what 'we would-.;like,:to :have,.-1n ;.Cp pert ino i1 ,At' ths,prgsont time;' he 'is' wil'ling:l:tol•gamble� tv;see ifa.this area �is,•uo.trsuitabla;to be • ; developed commerciallyra. Director Sisk stated' that' this :application,:was,r,conti.nu.ed;,-f'rota,,thej City Council for Planning Commission•discuss,ion',of;.the en,tire,;;;,;•, property. The Planning Commission recommendatien,wi•ll come,;befcire the City -Council on June ;21st. 26-U-69 3. Request of Stoneson Development. Corporat ion•,for; amendment to Use Permit 26-U-69: Shopping Center in P;(P:lanned Development.) y zone with commercial use intent.. Said property is located at. the northwest corner of the .intersection :of;Stev.ens •Creek,;:,,.; t Boulevard and Mary Avenue. First Hearing'. ( c.{•; I,:;+; : ,. r,;, Additional The Planning Director explained this„is ;an:applicat1pn:;;for amendment. parking to the Use Permit. There is a change: in the,,structure”:so:;.it;was'; spaces recommended the applicant come back tic) the Planning Commission for approval. The original and proposed„si,te; plans were placed on the bulletin board. With the' new plan t1tere will be 302 parking spaces rather than the original 269. f t 3 Building Mr. John Rodrigues, Jr. , 20430A Town Center 'Lane, .Cupertino., ,pointed moved 45' out they had just received. the Planni.ng!,Staff•,'•s repor,t'; that.,morning and had spent the day rearranging the:. site -plan. 'Since:,then.,..they , 400 sq. ft. moved the-buildings over 45 feet and have:provided .two, additio.nal added to rows of parking. The Planning Director. said the res;taurant,.s,quare +. building footage was changed from 9000 to 9400. There is no change in the retail. shops. ' s Tree Mr. Rodrigues- said the trees are :an advantage to the pro.pertyi and removal he plans to save as many as possible.• .He. said ;6 to .8 of about,,20 trees will have to be removed to provide parking, etc,., Restaurant to Mr. Rodrigues said all of. Phase I will be constructed,rat ,,t'his; time; be built however, special emphasis will be placed on the building of,.;the; first restaurant since they have a November 15th opening date... .It will be built first; then the commercial shops. Commissioner Puetz asked if there will be a berm or something to conceal the cars. There was no direct answer here. The Planning Director said the landscape plans include 10 feet along Stevens,: Creek Boulevard and 5` along Mary Avenue, Chairman Irwin mentioned the letter from the Superintendent of Schools regarding this proposed restaurant. 7 ,y, �•, .�` v„ i"un to try yw, A.{� ,y �' y r '” �u'��:v7�� ?°. ..r�.},F'iAi �?•�"K i�kN'ti•' •I H::Tf'4: Ai r4�`Vi 1-yr{t1F:7 +ti!} rittii; Cs T,:s + ,v ( { '• •v, J b, ,, 4 t , ,4•y.ap a�w��4 v� �j �,�y"w�1V P1��li"�ti JaJ, .� � 4f., �`.' 1 t a �r� .S C f t ur , t •'•�."• t(r i !�.,,?�t r'� ,f'.ua>v m>r'i! , y�:'M�L Ykk` sti^ 4{-('J' a�1+ ` t,. 'f4"r•i W�. i a i ...rr3 14 ',1p'T�v(+, 4• t •`',e + :r r t � , S r. { '1 t�r�;y•y rci .tom t v�����f},7 iq r 111P,-Al • } t- b a' r „t b$ j l5}'"d ' ZrPr}••,..l. n�f.may E¢,;; b�yi��a} i4�'-' , ,. •� t ��'� t. a Yt`�„yJ'�� �+ ,rk r,3 14'1- d+b2,} t.�'t�>'a 1t.'�"�fnj c :1 � + yy L t 1 . s} r't� - �11ilUttS `Uf t,li 1'1<dlil]1°rg C✓T11ia'cs lc:u rMQf tit g ofErJuilc 14' 1*97 D' li t7 t`�N rC 3j��{ ^ Pa Agh Commissioner'.Hi'r•shoriatasked'-if It is 'at ,:111t,p69sil .1, ;of the(trees. ": Mr`' Rodrigues said,t.one rof;,tho greatest, assets';of; the•propertyois the.:trees:: :,Everyr'.efEgr It. :1wi11,G© mad: +to 's;ctve"4t� many as possib.la: : .n c , lr t.. r ° r, a,rlrtlSllzi , r; Chairman Irwin asked for comments°from:•,the audiences Th°re ,wete`1 �l none Moved by Commissioner Buthenuth, seconded by:_Commissioner. Public Hearings. to close the Public Hearings, closed •,!Motion•carried,[l5 0 r : .,, a .! ' r :. -•.'. .i'S i:.(`..` ':i'i� � :i;.',1,}•.n.:1:��a.t F?.i r, •. e Moved by Commissioner Buthenuth, seconded by Commissioner,-M ,y rs [ 26-U 769 to approve application 26-U-69 with th1> following conditions approved with 1 - 14 conditions Standard conditions. r 15. The amended use permit is.grantcd for the land as­descrthed in the application:.and any att :chntents; there[o,and,al3;;shown,•; on the -plot plan .labeled Exhibit:.C: First;Rev.ision. 16. Removal of mature trees (12 inches or more;,inf,diameter) P' shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural and Site Approval Committee. . ':':, ui; ;;_, ! , >:,s: r 17. Shops having- a'single' entrance- to. .[ r ,. ; > ;; t shn11 not be located -.farther than. 40,(feets:from •the ends ;of•. ` y the buildings, 'as shown:on•:Ex1-xibit-'C,, .First•iRevision, ;or ,as an alternative access shall be .provided:;to allow,.emergency .; vehicles- to ente.r� said garden court, AYES: Commissioners-Buthenuth; Hirshoni ,.Meyers.;: Fuetz,• Chairran Irwin NOES. None Motion carried'.. 5-0 Chairman Irwin called for a 5-minute recess :at 9:30 P.M, , .'The Intermission meeting reconvened at 9:50 P.M. UNrFINISHED BUSINESS Commissioner Puetz said a review seems to be in order for the.• ., Request for Parking Ordinance because tile, trend has.possibly changed since review of the Ordinance was initiated in regard to the needed parking ratio parking ratio :. for professional and i,.dustrii.;.i buildi!;.os: Milk 1, 4 F a;,i`•t+ ;(• ..3�,x, +. s.... n �, txa a ,r; ,�, '"car L�. lk, a "�"C•r a, :. ;.: �s saM +� �= ,�v. -ye ,,r#'4 'r 53'1.4-q. H�'�(w�j.'' :r�; i, `i. Or�yT. w•:��EPE'4 <' ' nN 4}�t ;,fir at. � 5 Y ' .. I .E Stttr.v is �7d�i�>.t r7��¢�'ti""1��4 ���f 1ti 44. 3}r .a � .,� -fi '�wu},r�•.�rS y • .,r [...�,� a' t�„'"�^royks t;LJS�,S�l�^���a ES N,� �wr�,;2�� � r r1 �k3�}"'!L i� �"5 5 ' .. r S` fA•n�P`� JY� �'� {��� �J 4�(}�<1 �sett t�, 1 -�rah . •� \ax'r #sa L d J ,fQ� � �liM•t '45 •. .' _ sd.t p � Kgs }� is�,���Yn �� i���'tb�t� � .� 6 PC-35 Minutes of the Planning;Commission:Meeting i of.:June 14, ']9.71 K i �t,.:i 15p �SS�ritiflya i 'c The present'rat'ici)for parking. iri an indlis trial rzo.nEil,ia.,L: a;Coaa� +�a missiorier Pu,#tz• :believes restaurants shouldi;be 2:1' rather.:;than' 411 ?jq s x •. , since more 'couples 'seem'•toYgo Ito:rrestaurants:ithan •gruupsi of•aG. A Minute Order is probably in order zo -study Size of Director Sisk said•the size:•of :.the,:piirking-,spaces;should also parking be discussed. This was introduced at. the last Council meeting,,!,:,,, spaces by Councilman Frolich. At the present time, residential parking spaces are 9 X 20, commercial are 9 1/2 X 18, and all cases not s' specified above are '9 X 18'. z ,v::.a _ .,::•! Portal Commissioner Meyers asked if the slenderizing salon in the Portal parking lot Plaza still is obligated, toiupdate •tlle:parking lot, Director Sisk said he would research this applicat"Lon the following day. It was his understanding that the applicant had not yet gotten his business" license. NEW BUSINESS: rtrr,;: ;% - ! 4. Discussion' of street •pattern and land:•use- izi •.,the -Vicinity of the intersection of Saratoga-Sunnyvale ,Ro'ad w :th :Stevens Creek Boulevard. , er: t.. .t . .< ,;'.•,;. Signa.lization Four maps were placed on the board. . Director+ Sisk, explained there, and proposed is a proposed assessment disaric.*_ wh .chi.ithe•City,•Councili.:sent i street plan back to the Planning Commission '.fori xeview.•,�.A new :;b0-foo,t;,,street reviewed extending' from Stevens .Creek''Boulevard. -toi Alves Drive;and..,on north i to the undeveloped property is proposed •betw.een•ithe ..Gemco;pxcperty and the Bank of America. : There- are:aiseries,;oL lo,ng,,,ina,rrow parcels along Sunnyvale-Saratoga Load and it would seem desirable to have another, North-South street- to•:provide ,access,:other 44an., Highway 9. The proposed public street with-signal•ization at Stevens Creek Boulevard would' provide traffic flow and„control:,� Signals are proposed at Highway 9 and Greenleaf, at Highway 9 and an extension of Forest Avenue," and .at"the intersection of the proposed street and Stevens Creek Boulevard. If this plan reaches fruition the Mervyn's people will redesign their parking .layout to utilize the signal. Conunissioner Puetz said the problem is created by people leaving Gemco and going straight. across Stevens Creek Boulevard to Mervyn's. He proposed closing the median. Commissioner Meyers sai..t another street is necessary to come-down t through these narrow parcels along Highway 9. AM 0 F . Y+ ,�.. rLtit`�ygF,,� � trr'i' ,+s`�7 l,F,�.,� �`�ti.ft�'r :4r`�4n�"'�3 !g•„>;y.t�,��N �"+°�, r��, C�v�"�e + 'b�' �ert. VY��Ja: y , a r• 1•G hY� rs ,.tvl ,�s�4��� 1 ' 11�"�-Ie''�1 CdSf1�1Y�k��ah.�k� r3�� { 1 a n 13�y �!(t ,tq' . t'". ; ` , •,0. ltY ,r. x rj Itf`�,sb � .. .La�q,,•etr.� r�I�' v�� Ali�.��"4}'h Fry, ,n = 2dinutes,.of Chi: i'linnin Co :t���'on "tecti^�;' of JUIlL lair 171',`,1 ,uz�u C-3 5 "�!!ti i • L t'. . , +'i :1,Yt.+i. 1Ctb $•J7(JA i'M ' �S8 zekj�rsa tits 'r! .1`. g a a3 ra.+t r}• Commissioner Hirshon agreed with the North-South streetiexcepk�, �eprsition now F': 1 whore` i[`comes'into`'S'teve'ns 'Creek Soul'evirdta 'At'lthe'proposed ,rti1 �atrEet locetios►`;­he''said"the"street, o;uldr'be`-cutting �u`p' a:pret`ty laige' 4s fov.��lr. , r _ ... �1 ..�.,t. f ,n ., ! �1 tllrlvl.r: hF7 hi `lr�t it parcel' that' might othe`r`wise be' developed as' a 'whole ' Y ., r „ t ., % ! '+:1.: .!;it _tk%i r• 1. 1 ,ni a " 1 t` I ' Street width Commissioner Meyets 'saidl!if this 'is t� be a major` street 'wily is'` ! it proposed GO' rather th'ar.`72' as is Vista' Drive:' Direct'or 'Sisk agreed this was a point well taken. ' i t:C ,'ail:'? ( to!' . :'.t::: .�-: .1r t'Ii l'f 1' ..;, + t.+ 0 I1 �:f. ' ...fir c. •. Commissioner Puetz repeated -the"'problem-'i `;0ne'•'of'-goings across! Signal 'at Stevens Creek Boulevard 'tc`Meivyn''§:' 7He �tpropo'scd the Signal b'e'i`�-' iSaich_Way foll put at Saich Way. Vie Planning Director; said no -decision is needed at this time; he i just wanted some input froln the Planning:Commis'sion' Yegardirig' thel, 1 proposed street pattern, 'signalizdEion and.:zoning,'at I this' time,. Regarding the zoning, Chairman Iv.ai.n noted the'most southerlyF-1`'c+1l: Zoning: : : portion -is commercial !(Gemcol, Bank, .et'c.') ; -and- ;from Park Avenue'Fi idiscussion north it is R3. �..J'.S'..:,::'!Cj •`:is i t+tt+:• ;!; .:;::i•�d i$-;,l 1.7 f3 '`, general. The green f ' Comm 15510ner I-lirshon agreed with the plans in � $ ll , and brown areas are'good for �a'cluster developinent.,,•<ekcept? thfsl'r . 1 will create a traffic jam at the intersections'.: , lie!:was :inlfavor of controlling the traffic down near Sa.ich Way and Stevens: Creek"! + Boulevard. Chairman Irwin asked if it would be an impossibility to go under Stevens Creek loulevard , as was brought up jokingly by Commission- ( r,x Puetz. The City Engineer, said it wouldcdepend':on who:,would _:-; !' } :.. pay for it. i,'t•., r L _ri .� _ ., i The matter was continued until Thursday, June 17_, when there will' !Study session be a Planning Commission Study Session. t'.'.:'.1 ;:>i:)t `. (1 , June 17. REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Meyers said lie- will miss the meeting of June 28th. 7 } RL1'OKI' 01' PLANNING DIRE.C1OR Director Sisk said Mr.. Dan ,iartinoviclt is interested in using !Sail boat z property in a Light Industrial zone to construct a sail boat, fconstruction There was nothing in the Or.dinancc to authorize or prohibit this so the Director felt he should come before the Planning Com,'nissio for guidance. A. 1101 11811 111 { i ,i ' 4s xr a•tt�l'i'. an', �7sw.A; 7� s{•�, - . a i m.,. .t.' tf. tai: Y���i�'�;'• r �+i�t'�9�"1t t t3�``'''�1��'(� rz rr Y - t � ,nay •�'zL y.,r+ea r{;�r t'„t taz1•�r�`�n r4^ iY;9�+,,�'kr�,���' i �•ti,1 '��a�cz �i. a r � �' r{7 a : �rsat�,` i.1'Ce n�try t',•y�,,y`,+x�,F�v�r ,'8'� ,1�.,,t� � .k3'ri � . �rtiah z fa , '��r Rzv 5'") ° 3ifl •S• r..•,yi,l�t F):,`3 frr y �„!� � z�i3 tr �,5,c l PC-35 ;Minutes of the Planning`Commisuion Meting 'of-June 14, Page 10 j 1 .:i, r.+`?,r' + , •(3i,,i� ;�5+',ty t .. - ;,yam r ii.J•...--. •, f' 'r !..y<i'- - 17:!11 -i 41 l )f.``,, , 1 ) C,l ,. 1 �� ' ' Mr. Dan Martinovich, 20112yS,.Parkwood',;[i;cive,`Cupertino',n,sai_c�l its wti11 u� i ! take him about, 2 1/,2 years,:po,.bui Id.:this,boat, ,working�..�eyeeiQgs�� and weekends. ';lie ,thou ht he .would, construct fence aKo'und�, the: �,,. 1,�., ! t U.. """ad--.v t.R ..),x,.ri: � 1 property (located at Imperial Avenue ilia the railrotracks):to' 5. . protect,.the, children .in. the,area. ;, T.il_ s ,property is 'about300 feet';' : from where, he works,; and will be handy, for him. ;Chairman Irwin 'had no objections. The fence will protect the w , :•; .. children from• getting,.hurt and•.also, pro,tect,.the..projec.t:,.from vandalism.,,'^' Commissioner Puetz felt,;this project..l,tould. be..an,,aestt}cGi(; impioryement ' for the area; however there would be the problems�,of safe,ty�,and,,, ' security. The type of fence was discussed next. •.It ;was ,decided ;this;ahould be left up to the applicant. It was, assumed• it, would:be cha_in,li.nk. Resolution Moved by Commissioner. Puetz, seconded by, Comm issioner,�Mey,ers.;c,o;'4 passed pass a Resolution to allow Mr. .Martinovich)to,.cons.truct: the:_sailboat .at the aforementioned location for a maximum of 2 1/2 :years ,atzd.,:to . put a fence around the prope:.cty. AYES: Commissioners Buthenuth, Hirshon; Meyers,-,Puetz, Chairman Irwin NOES: None Alh ti Motion carried, 5-0 OEO document The Planning Director passed out copies -of a:document'from,.the O-.E.O. It will be discussed at Thursday's study session. ir;;; ADJOURNMENT ;;: . . :*r::•i At 11:03 P.M. it was moved by Commissioner Puetz, seconded by Commissioner Meyers to adjourn to 7 P.N. an*Thursday,l'.Ju"ne "17tli'." Motion carried, 5-0 ? APPROVED: 1 Cha rman ' ATTEST; i City Yierk