Loading...
PC 07-12-71 ' , t�" �+ 1 <�, l 1�+�'S '✓& . 'C r sgxyi''� r 8 4 ,w ` �"�t ' �' ,t�",: "Q...: ` 1. r ,�np : ', R ;�_i; �kf�'�� �r't.,{' \'� •.,�& 4`�' y,r•.''�+.�.',`�b `y�'SF j;"3�1 S�5'�ii(iS+w�'•;"4j,. �� ,'t F.. ��1 k §'. �i 5''„P ` Y ;!')N y 'k`• ” kt'+ k'�$}. t ,f4 '!$y ze'au " dnu�. t 4 iyyi „191.1 4 ,kt 44tz�fi i' +' �'>4r+�'�'it`,�� f'[✓ wr.1 A S h: t ;iy` t�E; d aft NH }ah 3 7A CITY OF CUPERTINO, ;State' of Ca7,i,EArnia;f�}l (.. . r'Ertl �"f�Y� �0;c a l`JF4Qit1 =�,r r r . t ,y t,t a =�: Pa a -T� ® 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California. a e .'�� A�& ;} Telephone; 252-4505 cep�, �d r•if , ,� . _j ,i •. t t !St rr. .r r S1- ;t 'f', ')ft -1 fJti:. ;.t?-„'.ill;) r : i,l .t� .drl 411 ��5�� ft`l.i.!"14�T'r] !("dl (.i3.� lit:. Ir :'i! .,1.. .. .'f ;,frt. �i!'•t:t 1..(: 1)1,t..,,.4 „)rj S•(�1::f C1')f1:1J.h�i - r�6)w�J °Jfl l'::n{�lj ,'i.f:r'• .' 1 I...,. .:•.: :.'' It t?'� - fi 71'(T ,'. � , '`?'i.1•'7•!, 'f MINUTES( OF;TRE•.REGULAR•,MEETING,OF';,THE.,?LANNING7COMMISSI0N,1rf,i+� HELD ON?JULY 12, ;1y31r.IN THE;COpNCIL,;CHAMBER, CITY( HALL t .:w CUPERTILNOV- LIFORN'iA SALUTE TO THE FLAG u• „'':;;= ;':,: ':t. ''i '.t[.i,'i '. °•'i'.fY' :,,r(.�; i"?iti 4,l1-;, j.•; n,r t:rt1.}.P,:rr) { The meeting was called to order by Chairman Irwin :at,.8 OO,,P M.., with the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Commissioners present: Suthenut'h, Meyers, Puetz, Chairman Irwin(,. Commissioners absent: Hirshon Staff present: City Attorney Adams Planning.Dir,ector; Sisk Assistant Planner Cowan- Traffic Engineer Grigg Associate Civil Engineer Whitten;.;,;. �� ;.,•; r! Recording Secretary Lois Inwards APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of June 14, 17, Z3, 1971 Commissioner Meyers had the followin.?, correction for the June 14t Minutes: Or. page S, the.last paragraph, which;shalld;.read: ”. presently zoned R1 and. Commercial.to Moved by Commissioner Meyers, :seconded by•Commissiener,.Pu.etz tofr� June 14 Minutes approve the- Minutes of June 14, 1971. as corrected. approved as corrected Motion carried, 4-0 :,;; < _, ,;,• Moved by Commissioner Meyers, seconded by Commissioner Fuetz, to, June 17 Minutes approve the Minutes of June 17, 1971, as read. approved as read Motion carried, 4-0 Moved by commissioner Puetz seconded by Commissioner, Meyers ,..tq r June 28 Minute carry forward to the next regular meeting the approva o,f the ( , approval ostponed Minutes of June 28, 1971. p Motion carried, 4-0 - � ri .i^r. 6 =+..yt� i4-d�'I;;♦1 y,,.t I Y,. _ 4�Rr P t• vii`( �,1.. >.5"{ ���•..F'.. r� x;i.. �i s '�.a S ` � �. t 4 4N -$ w y,`i,...a,,,, - � �_. �i.a ♦ it'^:i,r�k';7,�;'�;���y ss'`.,. �=����!' rt63f`�',� r„w �re5.2, „.�,�i > ti or; .�'�:��� -w4�r�,i` '�*��ti �r c�z"!,5 y4��1���3 yc. ,tg�'y,��&+�r• :”"', '' '�' 1 ��'#..,r,;'�. �',�,� ,y. � � � ,�,��,;,.fix . 4 y.a�... ���rl. 'p�•+ixu,�°r s h . {'Y: w FrrS,r � h y�,ll '}x .$ NCIq 7" �. .•:v �' ., a f �.� �ti'`�;, h :it• k.<< .y� �,, �,'tl�h,,r, �i,� � rfi �rr a yy$��" r ,a ,r,�y"»;,�,'��,. ra �'� � nt l i F1gTihRfs �sf[� p 'F K �''"�q�+d ' ,'-j. '.- 5: a 5in4�p +€�q.+ A�F•x�s"�1��0 x�yt 7tl~''j � t�rJ�wi` r<.E }• J�,y; 12 1971'rPL`ANNING�COMMI5SION<tigETiH�Gr� PC-37 MINUTES nF THE "'s�' . �...} Page .2 Chairman Irwin Chairman Irwin announces; that he; has been aepointedeto the'.'C F,� ?titer 4 appointed to mitzedlat letter aof resicnation .s Chairman of'the Plaiiningt� Councilr, Commis's on'.°} He}furth'er.-statedJ t.haC`h� has en�oyed`�'WOrk ngj�wibh`_t the Commission, and''the•'•staf f 'an''.1•'f or' them' t'oi keep up 'tlie)good{ ;" work. He then handed the gavel'over''to!•Viei'Chairuan Meyers, and Left the meeting. Chairm3n Meyers -said nominations were in order for the -of f ice of Vice-Chairman. Vice-Chairman Commissioner Puetz nominated Commissioner Buthenuth to the office ' Vice-Chairman Vice-Chairman. Motion was seconded by Chairman Meyers. jY}ri Buthenuth nominated AYES: Commissioner Puetz, Chairman .Meyers •t ;'J; :i,.'.•`y�.t,,r;, NOES: None rr t,�,, ABSENT: Commissioner Hirshon ABSTAINED: Commissiuner Buthenuth ` Motion `carried;;`2-•0 NTS POSTPON.r:ME . . . .. �_.:'•1 . . Director Sisk said Attorney Dempster has requested application '. 8-Z-71 be placed at the end of the agenda, due to 'his previcusT_:. commit tments. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION° - There were none. ,t Y ORAL, COMMUNICATIONS - There k'cre none. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Application 26-U-70 of Texaco, Inc. , 'for•'expan'sion,of gasoline te ice sttion dispensing system inRexistingSar.atoga-SunnyvaletZoad,sintawest corner of Ilomestea CG (General Commercial) zone. First Hearing'continued. Director Sisk said this application was continued from March 8th, upon request by Texaco. Their representative'was in the audience. n were displayed. Slides of the existing statio + t � r,�44ti);.ir�y��.4.,K `��♦,��{w';i���•{����af y�' ----.----- � �" ti "t ar�•v ^�'° � �' r=kc t r fi^�,,a �i'� f �;"fi"C r � ��.�>�'Z' •.;u- ''• yt85L.L.i •• `iY l "` �r'Cn_ 3 ' C:r3cmiL".�1.C+3edh`'L1�N.._ '�}'..... .. _' r r �.�YTG%u..d.,. e ^h".€t�1n' ,;. '''�^�" `1�.�"�y �iti i�e1, � t t�4,,��' ° �ti�iti�lai 9,��4� r,�•3� +,!t1`" '. l f (� �r",� `z...+ �'�, ` v d:A,. �,�� -l�'�'.t;t�itW2N 'rA7a`gf `iiF aiFAl r� .t s �;�,��T,�'� :fib I At+tAh) yip'.;`yX�fr`..r5t��`Lp� �{„y A�:. .t $.' a' �• ;+.. �< i°��� y��.��r`P��`�.r���' iii F` va' \+, Arr{ ,�47t1hS{D4-°��rrJ.v 4t`'i•�"t`- J3, i q h MINUTES 9F i ,THE,JULY :12Y,;,19].i. PI.MINiidG COIL"SISSION.�� iu}G��l ,P�a8ey3t�t' ' t i�l,r Mariani,,won't, pirector Sisk said; the property. owner ,has indicated! he.,.,,,,oes, nnaT toy se1'1 plan' to sell t}iei properE"y, _[o Texaco and. further does` not p � (' I,l., .� .,^ , } r 1 �.4T'31` Y r��MT a 1 r: 1 r'..al +! exac O''t s i a t45hp/µ^G7 extend the Pease." Based upon these circumstances,r thei T � i•`cu ;¢� ....... il r xepresentatJve has indicated that th'e Company cannot.'�ustify _t ,A „ r heav} ,�:apital1•investment,on the arse and will present a modified k site plu*i and :lrchit'ectural' rendering. Hl 'will also discuss landscaping. Commissioner ButhenuCh noted there are no' sidewalks or street No;,street improvement.,, on this-corner. The Planning. Director sad d, the J4,..•�,` hereoveuients P . Standard Conditions will require 't:hem. ; -.�:'_;; ti` ;ct ,' Adjoining Commissioner Puetz asked who is responsible for the` L-shaped' j g property adjoining this property;.,,. Direator Sisk said it is at the L-shaped present time owned by the Mariana people. It is not incorporated property into the service station site. Commissioner Puetz said he would like to have it incorporated becaause .otherwise ,it will become a no-man 's,land. q, :r,t.. "i<.; f ' said 8 years, left Mr. John Berry, Vice-Presilent� of Tri Statle, P.edkood City,, r he was ,representing Texaco.,in,ttiis appl.icat'ion�. ` He; said there, on lease are about 8 years I r•ema.ini.ng in the .lease. ; The•Texaco station;is on .leased prop erty and �Mariani won,�t, sell-. 'then.presented ,a tentative plan and a 'rendering of the proposed impro'vements'. . It Improvement r ;, is present a two-b.ay operation. They want to- add 'cedar"'shakes plans to the mansard roof,and:improve the;building. t He=said there is , .. no room ,aruund. the pump.islands for,landscaping Plans call for ' a 4-foot cyclone fence with redwood battens. There i 6 1 a trash' ncloeiure.behind 'the building,' so access to itmust be`maintained. T.he' applicant said he did not,re.alize theypuetzwonder'ed'''ifmit ok come din er back and install sidewalks: Cou¢nissioner ID would be possible to get the landowrer'to come 'in'becauser'there are quite a mew •unanswered questions here!,., Co:nmissioner, Buthenuth wondered„ after' the 8ryears are up;"and" someone else gets a 'lease, would they have to come ins'for';'a"neW1 . Use Permit. Director Sisk said they probably would since' rthere'` would be substantial changes to the structure, etc. Mr. Berry said the installation of a sidewalk might very'.well' change the geonietrics and the c+:ncrete pump islands might have to be removed. Texaco has approached Mr. Mariana-`about improvement`s and lie does- not care to do anything because .the lease runs out in 8 years. Chairman Meyers asked for comments from the audience. . There'were none. ADA i �,•a..,.. � �ri . Y "_YT'�+s:+5'rsS'aY:� e� ..'S •est.�,. � - � a�t ti3 a .:r...a"5,.� �• r � ip '�v 11s�ti2•. !„ L�` 1s�1, a,y,YS .c�'y� t r 1�ro r - s., 1.�+ 1iJ•7��9�+ 't'h 5? rktYl4`�t•,+v V'7r'�li t'S`+,Y`rt wti;ij 1�. � t'�` i7 :7t„w ±4V � ,�� s� , r t .. i � �.� } '•i r'r tV, r�5 ls.k:f lit .[... � a6,V dt� +h rt C t ,".` r t + 7 � 1 f�;•yr•ro r t�4 Ytlt 6r•UV44 7�pp `�S�"T b b� `!j'N rat r 1S r y [ r t� \+• , i V , � ? FrX ! i �, , j�3'd t� t >S'� �w�k••�r.' r e �t�t ti w •, - - - N + 'i1� � 7,+'•V'�n f E�,SyYt:,yet I M - } ' r� kA}i ce y �4,, �,-„� i? �'�441 y{ ,�tl4fdpt '•y>rk ��t�p a,R��y, • 4 I I s t gy r 1I I", �rr{r',ft(rr t5>ri��fr t t:♦ , S3� pM1 I+V A�tii�'1 y` ib PC-37 MINUTES OF'THE `JULY 1`2';"`1971 PI ANNING 'COMMISSxO�i„MEETING.j} 4+fig �f � "�,sl� +�t,� '` Page 4 „ s 1i �� 4wYktfit r}ra • {{' , w a Yhh �rc a .. I i� �1,`1(r:.': •.r •t -'. , t 9 n r. i1 ” t}, r' ( � �.1 rE 1•ltY��Y�.+FISr4 TherrCity Attorney answered'.Couuttission Yuetz that there)Js probab Very little the 'Ci'ty caq do .until the propertyt owner comas in c,' { fi?,�' �ts with some kind' of application ` r'7J t�`1 ' r: V J r.i' 1< 3„!' :i..,• y< its r?t�ffin,hVa'�..�fv,'rfa^Z2 .: i '” '`1 .•f. r.•:1rV'• 26-U-70 Moved by Commissionerl•Puet z, "seconded, by ,Commission`er Bu'thenuth h`�� i ;., f'.7 r r , );;,•1 ,r r, rr l r,"rr ,-<f fy -:t continued; to continue application 26-U=70 until" the n• ext regular tweeting, i., ctl,. ' staff to with the instructions for the staff to contact Mr. Mari�ani' td-srae.' contact what his- intentions are regarding this property t ' Mr. Mariana AYES: Commissioners' Buthenurth, •Puetzr,--Chairman Meyeis``' NOES. None ABSENT: Commissioner Hirshon u i!Lotion''c•arried';'. 4=0 r .. " '°`! 2. Application 13-Z-71 of Car:L ''N. Swenson Company,i In'c'.",`:for",-.. '•' prezoning approximately 43.1 acres from county Al=40.j (Single-family Residential:-Agricultural 40,000 sq. .ft.; lots). to. P .(Planned DeV elopment)' with intended 'use of a 211 unit r single-family `residential' r_`uster"development Satd "property is located southerly of 'and'adj;acent to'S,tevens "Creek Blvd approximately 1600 'feet west'`of'Footh'iTl"Blvd ' { • First Hearing , AlMh continued. (r lr IfJJ 4.5 parking Director Sisk ,stated the amended.'si'te 'plan''indicate,'r4'.`5'`parking' 'spaces/unit spaces per unit; a total'-of •422 garage;'`82 bay, 'and''23`'tandem' spaces equalling 5,27 .spaces; excil'uding driveway parking:��_Therert: will also be 422 driveway space;;.' However, a few u!nits on' the. easterly property. line have a 15--foot setback, which means -that an auto would extend into the"traveliaay while;parked}' waiting rfor a garage door ,to be opened. '• r, r?•tt; Interim. A Cupertino School District representative"has' indicated 'that pedestrian access via Stevens Creek Blvd. to Lebanon. Avenue, then onto route Lockwood Drive would be acceptab).e' interim pedestrian'route``to Monta Vista School. The applicant proposes 'to''conetruct- an``off-,' site sidewalk adjacent to Stevens Creek Blvd. .`from``the' eastern'"'`' terminus. of this project to the corn^r of Lebanon Avenue.` 'tThe-*"'; remainder of the pedestrian rouge would consist of a dirt and gravel shoulder walking surface. There is an' exist�.n.". J.0-foot paved walkway through the City of Cupertino park site 'betweeri'`f Lockwood Drive and Monta Vista School. It is recommended­that `a) unit in the northeast corner of the project' be' r,eloc'ated 'so"that' a sufficiently wide pedestriat. walkway could be cons tructed"From= the peripheral street to the sidewalk of Stevens Creek Blvd. ' Mr. A. J. Simms, repr.esentiug the Carl N. Swenson Company, 777 N. First Street, San Jose, said rhe had reviewed the July 9th memo from the Planning Director and saw no problems in fulfilling the t. V 1� f + r r.., h.f 'y'�'s"e5wt'+ t��7•t +z,tf�., _' • ? .kv S r,9 y",+•-�'� ..t..ts •_ C ti���+'F.�SfY��Y,f�;���`r.�,'aq�!. S r'r �:2}t r E.' 3u �''� Mir.�'•i: ``'t•^ L'� G �'�P .w:A.. ,Ir ,. ;P•tilfir a`r" `u', v , .'t a .. uu >v ti ',,� .. �aFS v7 dF M: tG '*`+rL 4::�'� .���ik�,tf?.�S�t .5;: i�,y Y`(�+++t. ^ia' '`'i.'� 't�C.'m t"Jfl-. .�Ys R!'.��,i�.,.,�' u t l• '�y f 4 jai ',�'.'' "it �,..u1.1 �irF i kl• L F 1 2w r T .t:. (p d rt F' \�l JV T7+t,.C f t 4z r • �S% +t.:4Y"�•a,i`9�h wlAt. 7'�'il617 fta '�."Ct .'•a !y�! 1 i,`, w cR 'i k `'JriA°. '.iP4tJ^r7"�i I it t, 4? �.15' ?i �.fi'}z. �`•-t..'k T'y +�`4�'`�'t't f:�le��'} Y. TMy4`�3 t�hv � �.f./,,�� 1.';�3 MINUTES OF THE JULY 12, 1971 PLArfNING COp- 1TSSI0N MEETING' PC,V31?, ' :y: Aft . i' :,{` 11 v. .A' ��`�'wrfp,�Gtt. lc•{ t�ti. conditions imposed on this application. The' 20' setback can ,i--+ Saves the trees`,'. however possibly causeY`more h 'robl'eins''th'ari scil,ve'thea: B Ia7 t'Ci 'r,:3,f:tr y. �I� ,s,; �, , rn. iv y maintaining `the -15fuot``setbeck''cm'=ttie{ en"sterly`{sde`:'of fthis.j' ?'•?�, ', ' t devela�pment', 'they' have"been able 't� 'save' all'` the atrsesy. ';H,e noted„ �` .s*,, , t that the 'iots' between this"d'evel•cpment}`ard Lpbanon''Avenue''are very >3•+., deep, and he is not sure that it' would!'mr',ke' a'••greiit).de`ah' ference to those property owners whether the setback is 20 or 15 ' f eet. - He 'sa.id 'th`ey can' meet :the:-'20=foot"se't6acks tiut in 'the '' ' '`{ ' interest of good planning, we a].7. might'�b'e•`better'toff' if the• 15;' art foot setback is imposed here. Mr. Simms said they have been working with the School Board. As Streets and far as the street is concerned along Stevens Creek Blvd. , he is pathways not'convinced'that the' 'narrow�wid*e-narrow street ='corifi'guration proposed by the Traf f is Department: is the best •`soluti'on;:abut'• is'r>�' willing to Jive with it at this point. They have no objection to the right-of-way:' From a;policy standpoint, 'approachinl;"th'e'3 ri:',.•� foothills, 'a'90-foot'Istreet 'is•`adequate. • 'Whether 'it is, 90`nor1•Y10' .,' feet does not affect this development at this time.­;0' "• Regarding the 15-foot setback on the easterly property line, 8; units Chairman Meyers' asked"'how'many units and'how-many i trees, '`ar'e t-I's':rt;, 4 trees'',`X- a€fected. '.' He'was•'told-that it would•affect !8 units,' and ti-i'f'-,the 20-foot `setback is maintain' it'would' encroach upon•4'trees:+ + '•�''?' ' }' ' . �� �•.. ... .: •:. ..:i ' � '::�. �: tit .:.' .''l. IJ( ri + • ✓ 1' S Chairman Meyers asked for comments from the audience: r•'' -' ! ' Mr. Frank Wallace,.22841A•Medina-1*ane;"Cupertino',•='said"his.[horeer�`;� Concu'rned is south' of ' this property: He'said he protested the original}'c' ? citizen's development plan for this' property.I -He" was,:impressed';withD har'0 statements Carl N. Swenson'Company'reputatil)n. `'There':is`•'a-,drainage')pYoblem and 'it will take' at least 5'1 eet of fill. 'He'-,asked•!if''the City`I;f would require a bulkhead under these icircumstances': If:-not!" thee fences will be leaning into his and his neighbors' yards. He hopes the City will require matu;-r e planting.''' He! sirongly requestEd one-story units along the perimeicer of, the property to 'help • {'?i protect the privacy of the homes already' in the•'area':::'•`.' Commissioner Buthenuth said he would like to hear from Mr. Simms Grading regarding the grading. Mr. Simms said the only plan for fill is along Mr. Bean's property. They are 20 feet from the property line there. They will not injure those trees. There will-be a• redwood fence along the property' line. All'the buildings'are 2-story bldgs. g two-story. A row of trees will 'be created along the' rear. ' From C a marketing standpoint, it will 'be necessary to make this develop- ment as attractive as possible. r Chairman Meyers asked if there will be any storage area installed Storage areas Agh for boats, campers, etc. Mr. Slams said, there will be•.standard,%.! size garages. ` � fit``'a�;k"'�'{�}�?-+�r'r •2 t � ��' ,.�, " F: ,�{ ;� � �. . ,t 4- ,5• a �..., � �^s'tx,��<,ku`�yc�-.".�r' �'`,'`�;�s�"�e..aa„ „� '�id� .s:�u�- '�±.os` c-er.a 8; '�e.`4L-,?3 •s _ .. _ _.- ---- -__ r }S4:•F. t,:}.,'�, i�'�•tilti, y. n,4giy"!r i�,vr^�sSt'iltSnyt,, M `g¢ �y;+ y;�;{ , n.or�at �r�jh{�j SF•7}1 i�,:i',y��.J+��"�4�ti��'�1�i�, ,�,r� ;�a�.7����r���,.l�r'*j2ni1, S.'�'b�•i�t+����?t Ff°'�iC�� S�'�� Hb, {•5> i,� �•v ,p/. •� M�+�.,.k} y5 �Y'HD••J rai S J1�y7y I5„'(`♦xn I' �??Et e�..a4'�.. �' t �G i r� 4Y� 1� 1! L'l 3 `' t.. `4•-• ' 1.''' .Y, { S Yj'�}''.5 � t,f.(FtI f, f1 -4�� 2 bh �V `0• ��� tl { J. • r 1 S1•. Z r .'3r �•�.,r ,Si ��'ry�y�1`\p5^�+•S'a��,$v{,G�az4gr,;�� ,� �`�'�,f.�'��� a "'t`r , f l:• ,{ lJ i ik.r � r J ,s� r ,(..ut, yr t tirpr 1'�r ,,�•. /t.^ . .f r,' '1`47"1 C) ?•4i i.• i ,f C, ` 1�' t_1•c1,,. PC-37 MINUTES OF THE .?ULY 1. , PLANNING COMM'ISSIQN•MEETING,_, Page 6 Ay Vi points Chairman r ,Me er8,' es+t •,�St:::' 1 i .! . °'t r'. .'�! rltJ 5�, ti:. P� f!l).1 Vista To ' y,. •,;,qu iou,,,Mr, ,S,imms anst�ered that) they .have not ntadei any, studies; as ;to pathways; to,,vista•:points_ the,x,op�g}i area. • Ther•e .is• an cxis,ting,,trail that .meanders up„rto the;tgpof,t, t the hill.. ..In. addition, Feople.,will,,probably ;create; their_:,own paths as they• explore, the..open,,area. ; ; ,,. Public Moved by ,Commissioner Puetz„ seconded by;,Commissioner .Buthenuthi;:,':_j. Hearing to close the Public -Hearing.;;,; closed Motion carried, 3-0 Commissioner Puetz,•commented .that,;this is.,the;••best;•plan•,we,.havo ;,,,., seen as yet for. 'this proper.tY•. Commissioner Buthenuth asked- the Planning Director,.if ,t,he.people_; will feel closed -in here. , Director-Sisk commented i,that withal 4(e 15 acres untouched,• this is basically. .a. good app,roach., ` '” i i.. .'+i. :J•;Y'.'... ;1!:;t:;' : :l•i irf 7.Et';..`.<::,{:7i ..13-Z--71 Moved by Conunissioner-Puet.z.,, s.ecoAded...by,Comm,i g,, oner,•:Buthenuth,,,;,;, approved with to recommend to ;the City. Counci].,.approval ;of,,application 13 ,x-.71 ; conditions with the 14 Standard-Conditions;and :theia44iLional .;condiL.ions- 15y Amok through 39 lister the Planning Directo'r's memo of July 9th, with the aineadment,-,to condition;•39. .lhat iij sor4e.ins Lances,,herewith a 15-foot setback will not affect the existing trees along the easterly-property ,,line,:recommending .eight.-,single,,,story structures along there; and condition 32 sh.ail•,read: "At•+the;time._of ,;,,,•.; consideration of any:Use. Permits•.;as ,required by."the;Planned,;(.;,, Development Zone„the•applicant shall ,submit }detailed plans setting forth information .relative to any ,proposed. grading,�gi the,,;site,,f7fl as well as-a geographical •report,. , ,,) , AYES: Commissioners Buthenuth, ,Puetz,. Chairman. Meyers NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Hirshon. • Motion carried, 3-0 3. Application 14-Z-71. of Albert Perrotti for prezoning,,.22.,acre from County ML. (Light Industrial) to City of: CuPertino.ML ,,, (Light Industrial) . Said property is Lot 347, .Tract. located westerly of and adjacent to Imperial Avenue;,,.approxi- mately 200 feet south of Olive Street. First Hearing.,, Colored slides of the property and the 1969 Cupertino.. Generale Plan were displayed on the board. , Alk `r5i i '�° zi�h�ry�`:-. •L .E``E�rtfir.' .'•"'�`�;yi,�._ 'n'..- rt�-1r+�A° ���`�'ga r,S`k's.'�.�� ;�jM rr`�i,;- •,�r.,'�r..: toaria?�ac�����Yvr a• s. 1'�r a.' ���'S`i r .tt.'1�F !^ ,c�, �+�' Jr ��u�t v�. �d?rkYt•�M � �i y o �, �t i y '¢', �;71•� ` 4't J{�T m}jlf ! ^ t h y SAS v i1u� � it 'ta. h � t, ( ,�.�, r„' v 'At + p •� t5r�rP, !c i v.}y t� rr �' r� l v 1" rs rr op, t, r V4 `• NrI`SGETItIG � .#rM4, Lr; (froi PP10 ? 3GB$K"37'M4 0i21171 IING Y! , s7MINUTES OFr'TiE''JUL iJ;• '; to a 5t?.d,.� �t ,�, ��a�Fx Pr✓'nt 1t , P4r:"`Robert Jones`;' RetxlCor%;7 2225 {lracit"Roadi,l'L'os: A1tos.;rlsa d'tth A5 i s :the 'only 'part.:thgt will11owI ,{ '} a t r, easterly portion of the pro pert p Y a 25-foot building. •. j, „Qsl !,:1 •'( .U:It•Ff ri Ci l> :7'I ir',i e., Mr.' Bill'White ''10271 Imperial' Avenue, Mcntat Vista', rsaidsfie bought Zoning:mis , ( his' house''wiW;the -understanding there •would"be 'onlyiiresidences;ao understanding the south oi• h`im.1-He understood 'only. 50 :feet; of;ithei 'subject-pr;o..r perty is zoned Industrial and!�2fi`feet -1s Boned Rlt) iThel:AastsG'anL'! ^;•. Planner said he had double-checked with the County, who assured ; him'the property is' zoned Light Cndustrial .t r:-,:d:. , ., .:a:r'•:'t :7,s, t.r l , . ,,,� ,• ::, Moved by Commissioner Puetz, seconded by Commissioner Buthenuth ;. Pub 1.i.c Hearing: to close -the Public Hearing': J t it i i r .:, ;•c•_U „+' :a' •ed i• ;; r .. . . .s, .,,��, �,_r.;;:.i.�;io. Motion .c rri , 3-0 Moved by Commissioner Puetz, seconded by Commissioner Buthenuth 14 to recommend to the City Council approval of application 14-Z-71. app roved AYES 'i sioners'`•Butiienuth tuetz•, -Chai'•rman•FMeyers: Comm s NOES:' None ABSENT. Commissioner Hirshon ( } Motion carried,"3-0: 4. Applications 15-Z-71 ;and-:14-U-7:1 of,-.Robert•:B.;::Ippolito,for-: .. rezoning .91 acre from R2-4 .25 (Residential Duplex 4,250 s ft. 'per' unit) to BQ;(Qu.asi-Publics'Build'ngs),;,iandl:Use,!r.0 :�•!`;;: q• Permit for 33-bed rest"home .',;-;Said' P ro per ty: is:located-:iat:;r:.:; r::t •a°i •.., the`southwest 'corner. of the ,intersection of t'Foothill''.Blvd. and Alcalde 'Road. ',First --Hearing.' Colored slides of the area were shown. A location map indicated, Possible the property in question is bordered:by •R2 and Rl.:;'1The,,Plannin J realignment of Director noted that a future realignment'of Al.calde coul&-affect Alcalde this property development. Mr. Robert Jones, Realtor , 2225 Grant Road, Los Altos, said he represented the applicant . Chairman Meyers asked the staff if parking is a,problem.s .The:;r.ii: . Parking Planning Director said -that although the number of .off-street parking spaces conforms to the Ordinance, which requires,l­space--. per 6 beds, 1. space per doctor and 1 space per 3 other employees', the Ordinance is not realistic. The City Traffic Engineer -estimated that based upon an average of 2 'trips per day. per.resi- dent, 13-20 stalls should be required for the facility.' In'.!. ai - .i i Nt$��. RP4�V>r'.��`'�fiz�''�c'�.ig°'`.'i, "i�rs�''r"��.. h� t;.YdAiJs,M'l��.:a''!r;r �4�� � � rYi rJt }h�*1�„ xEx"n��k •'°`V.. �`.• �t "�t. ___"`d�� :yaa:.-4�a.:�; _.�..ri s,�i 5°J<.s��..�a.:3: i1�ia,m[t «aex.e>;5•?'a �-i-\�•R re�'\.'!.'l;1.�r i •N Sy a� M+1°fi-��Jp �y� {SSfS i'''ts �, ^, Ai iiy � � f.�1 S5�, ,.,.;.y rat "'.r.isY }�V�A1tii,�•• W ,i� a 4r h�'fn�f t,i, 5 +' i + ,s+ s� `t �' l.� f^ �:�� .�ti'Ra �.�.� ti�w. car Fl r � .• �, ,i4`i� x t � i��,, , S+?�t �•i r' ,.�� �e �.-� '?,t`sti�a�n+` A' to�� � S�yk ,'`�}3Y�v" � 5 r 3+`{����y yr'�'� wt 5♦y i� an � �S'> •�.. 0Ii �'•! S� 1 . v>. L P4 .}i yr� 4,t'' , I .ly 5 I'm ' - E ,, t,a t- a4 lo -r'� •u� Q; c p,xt'.>11.�.}t.},'rij �k � !Y S �{" v't ' ' ,.� I{ i ..{l r i4::�1'•�f C 1{2.1� Si�' q• t�''�.,..�.�E �`t,.M;fF rR� x '+ i •�`t�?L{i j i:. , S..{. ti i��,t a�•"fit r t 1� c ,F1'k-•�' tk�k Nrl�y4F�lr� � .a.�N c, t j�U a � �• • •y�i.f' � ^'�C n7r n{al}g�h?�,J'�k 5��i V>~ !3�� r ,. S�' 7 PC-37 '': MINUTES OE,TILE;:JUL'Y)1, -2 1971 ;PL/st`iNING COMMIS��QN,rp1ElETING'' t a°�,��y�� � � ��t`�r� �s t Page Fi k5 S±i a it\u !•r°l 4'T 3 3 r 3`� lt:,j I.�'i; .. additian',•,,th,e:,back-unl dlstancss ?an _th© proposal1 ar�!'jbelojt okr ndeXd,11. i, par.ticularlyr?for eervice.�iyQhicli�. _rs:•clti`tC, Ir! "• t,� ,? c),i s,[t.tl �;tl r 31k c c, r:g /,+� r � �,�' Fur the Commissioner Buthenuth asked the. applicant if he would ob' ect'to research ccntinuance; on this 'applicat,ion?itq:, enablej,,the"Pianning;Departmentitt" ' needed to dot some further research.rr•Mr._i, ;.Tones, said,;he ,tilquld ?no t _ob��ec ,if they, are.:legitimate, problems:;!Jic. :noted;:that ,there;;i43 •auite;ca,;dgXay'' to.Just; get-son the, agenda rin -Cupertino ,.• : ,,r 'F: ; .,,.,, ; ., ; � ': 'i:r ' .fu:' ... •,: .u? .,. l;r.., ..n� l .• ..?ln.,t{{, �'• i , Chairman Meyers asked f.or,:comments :from;, the,.aud;ience;., i,IhPre�,werei ! '' none. 15-Z-71 6 Moved by Commissioner Buthenuth, seconded •,by::Commissioner,Puatz .,[o . 14-U-71 continue the Public Hearing on applications 15-Z-71 and 14-U-71 to continued the next regular meeting. Motion carried, 3-0 ,,N 5. Applications 16-Z-71, 10-TM-71, 15-U-71- and 16-U-71 of A1do - and Mary Andreatta• ,an&i.G S,E;.Cal;ifor.nia,_Land:;,Holging' Company for (1) Prezoning 3 1/2+ acres from County CN (Neighborhood;;! Commercial) to City of Cupe:rtino.,.,CG•;(G.eneral.r-Commercial•):,:' (2) Tentative Map to divide said property, into two'par.cels;. (3) Ube Permit for-service -:;tation:;on Parcel One, and ., (4) Use Permit for cocktail .Lounge on Parcel Two. Property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Stevens .Creek.Blvd. and',07oothi'll 'Blvd.' First,•Hearing, f, Traffic Colored slides of' tlie',area.'were:,clisplayedr ';The;,staff's ;general pattern concern is directed 'to� the, shoppJ'.ng'.center 'design as:;related to Foothill .Blvd., The original .intent;of,,Silv,er, 0ak.,Way,; s hanbeen• to provide the primary access to .the, property inyolved;•.thereby not requiring access to Foothill- Blvd!. Commissioner Puetz asked:'about the;plans for ;signalization,;of this intersection. Director Sisk said- the signalization';.and;;channeliza- tion have to be defined a bit more, The proposal Mr. Richard Hanson, Attorney, 200 Third Street, Los •Altos, +presented a rendering of the proposal, lie said they are;going; to.•remove,;•the ' existing buildings. T1-,^y are proposing to relocate the cocktail . lounge on the property. i ;. .r�;l•r Traffic Mr. Hanson went over the traffic pattern, showing how, it, can.be,a pattern total righu-hand turn situation. If,. in the. future,, the,City decides to close up the ingress/egress to Foothill Blvdr •it„wilh present no problem. The Planning Director. said. that: a.lthough;:lhere is sufficient pnrk.ing, there is a circulation problem.-%;.V- said;.; vehicular access is necessary from Silver Oak Way. t t5r � ) ?tom. •'.., � .l;'+''�e a�,,y�'�,,e �`�>zt,;LL�sY rwi,f,, , ,i�+ �+G:., ;'n�'tb r,jdY r •u`ar".^5k 'u � A``hi3,a.•? `��y ,.� 5 ..it.w �r¢�� �;�a '2�'-:1 tY ' 'J' :f?i•S�+1 S ". lit.Cl.� - � " 1 Y.,vi,,,"i'��X.Yk J% ' }+.. i ",.,',: nj v q. Ask ' a �+��,f l+,i���t�,'s�t A"•i/1`f �`rl`����' t•�4ntr�'�>R�"y�.5;+��* t +~ �,a.t"'tT 4 R%t Sirs'? �kl t �� � y r r`t� .• MINUTES nF�;THE;IJUi.Y��l2L,a 197,? PLI�INING COIfiiISSION II ���ING1���}�'��.!��� F agek, 1 The; Ci_ty,'Artor.ney,,;advi sed;:xha_t;,t.;he.,property,,,can ,be;=pFezgned.t b}�tfl# P,rezoningj 6, .r he; was ,not.,sure,ythut:_;thor;e .c.an(,b� a,Ll..otr split ai:r,.thisi,tin{eiriaf�,r;r c' pre sp,7;itti;ng) of ea property pre-split,;of:•:the;, property.:rwas •sufggesteds, , ,ktti 'srq+ >,I:?r Ott ,,�t' d + r +11 !n J CJ.1 �'s,•-te �: Traffic ,,Engineer Grigg• aereed•,withj th.gJ,lanning'!Airector,�that; continuance, is needed;;on, this ;ap,?-atiou.,r,', ,,;;, r;,; ! ,,r-,,n �i :,`!, '-` �.:'•' + ' 'a:'it.. � :",t '", '.1 4;i, •r ...(:" -''+ r r3 •'L f1._:. r,' f ° � Moved by Commissioner,Fuet_z, seconded by.Commissionen, Buthenuth',-� 16-Z 71, to continue .applieatiuns,,16-Z--71, r10-TM-7,1, -15-U ,71;:6 1G-U-71 „r 10-TM=71, Public hearings until the next regular Planning Commission ' 1 , 15-U`71 meeting on July .26th. ; ;u ri.`, .:e. ;! :. ..__rc, 16-U-=7J1,:::: a..., • .. f !.:r `f"!, ,`.fi'] :?U;I :r'Lhr�(l:._ continued .�: "'.'Motion, carried;, 3r0•r _;#_,r:!==;c r, ,r,;)ri i'� Chairman Meyers called for a,recess ,at,,10:.00;P;.M., rThe;mee,t�ng;,f;,; _t i:t!,_; ;. r! , reconvened •at, 10:10 P.M. :; ;r, .::r, ...... ._ti, r(u :Ji:r , ': UNFINISHED BUSINESS. 6. Amendment to Use .-Permit 12-1J 7691 of;;AAA Ambulance!•,Cpmpany.,, ,,}r ,;;)..•;; s. Study -of new plans.fcr 'the ;:cenovation of ,the existing s)tr�uc-, ture being utilized•by _the •applicant,.as authorized period cf, nine u;onths;by Resolut ion;No ,-,807 ;o,f S,eptember 1970.;. • Said, property,,is. loca Led-.at;;the southeastrco�rner.c;ofcjr' Orange Avenue and Stevens Creek Blvd. The Planning Director ,displayed ,-the original Lpropa,sal:,and an j;.�i The proposal updated version, ,as.weli,;as,:coloXed slides ;of the area ;He saido the applicant's current proposal .is to.,amend:;12-U-E�9,:;to,:pezmit;�m;; renovation of the existing building rather than construct a new facility. . The' original plan.proyided,.for,,;a,1250;sq..-:f t,; building - to be constructed, as well as fully improved off-street;•parking{;;:_ for four ambulances and six passenger vehicles,. -.;Lhe.,,headq�(arters building was to house four ambulance crews involving from 8 to 10 employees. The current plan ,is .to utilize the existing building to house two ambulance crews (4 employees) . The Planning Director recommended , should this application be approved, provision of a minimum of four 90° parking stalLs adjacent to the south property. line and the garage revamped if necessary to provide storage for the two ambulances. Commissioner ruetz noted that. Orange Avenuc_ is a sub-standard Orange Avenue street and l,e felt it should be opened up, just in case something sub-standard should happen to block off Stevens Creek Blvd and the ambulances needed to get out of there. „ R11 ,111 ,111 ,I I ffilq�! yJ;.,.� � . d c�h�.natat k`�.'$t-tEnxa��-�+ `Y4r�r`'i���s'�.a�;� 9 - `+.+vT <Yr+ '�n •'•�y ,,,r,, ,. _ :, 3ui t ,r 4 ti. > sti,.i�'�r:ti,>,;t4tc '�c!•`Z� �Ek '�v+, t,;t Fo � -ti��� ,s i. f. :yy, - y �t , ..iL y '3 r.lJ,{ Y`9 ^ R yh'M�rt,ryA jv y,r rA y' 'i'Z� i i,s�',��' � d t� '��`' «!� 4' , 7 d n`t r3 ty��l��'+t ifia✓' • s �,:nf c t. �; �r:���ia �..d 4 r t tv s� r t ,s,sir�x�• yq ': t, � �<• ' •E". s ''.I+ (* er ,•t tp h V r .a Ir Y yy'�` �¢} ,}Zti Sxm Air��,r , r ?( 1�.4, •� [tr` Af1�1� h'Y 1Ya `I t`� $' � 41 y r i ; ,•1,4 rh'. � 7 ,T "via 4 �,. .: r a n+ fir r , ��' d• n •.� + '., PC-37 MINUTES o):�THE.JULY E 17;. 1971•.P1,ANNING ,COMMISSION Page y� TryS Pa to I�' a�•® tN g J Nr. • F_r ,i,t'!+}wt t�SS+Jrr i����a F,{7r�v Attorney's Att'oriiey -Pan Dotiova&'ssiidt'he'winks','representing';thewappli"cants.l die{, statements said' this"'pa titular e'i`tes handlles'`P,b'o��t 15'rcallg` pe'r montii;t�orf to 3 calls per day. It augmenl:o:ithe -Santa'"Clarai.oper{ation.}'�i,Heyr� !''' said they have not had any accJldents and questioned;`rthe .needrfor,c��'yjtf �`�;+x., improv t•emen "of' Orange 'Avenue':`° lie'.'said''the applicani}sh'ad 4hoped build a building for four:'ambulances -and' eight°!employees i sTEto"�'� volume of work has not progressed to warrant this. The'',garage. is actually used for ping pong recreation by the employees ;No personal' parking''is' at'`this' _x:ation'. . Thet'employees'"-'park the1Y'%" 4 cars at 'the Santa- Clara location; where''the-crews''change;-!,6 fte ;s Area cleaned Attorney Donovan presented before and after picturesso£tsthe tiu'tlding• ;'' ;; up showing how the applicant had cleaned- up the place. In the eighteen months they have operztted- here"they have received no . complaints.- Time limit Chairman Meyers asked 'if 'the`applicant• would- be amenable to''aE •rC: time limit on the use as proposed at this •meeting:", Mr. !Donovan,.-2 said if the volume warrants it, they will probably get a third station similar �to this ,on the border between Santa Clara and Cupertino rather than enlarging; this one, 12-U-69 Moved by Commissioner Buthenuth., 'seconded'-Vy:`Commis6ioner`;Puetz t� amendments to'approve amendments to'applicationX12-U-69;''subj'ect- "th approved. standard conditions and -the con.ditioiis'recomuaetided,.:hyzthe,"Planning Director with the exception'that in.Cdndition 17'ithe'•words`-' "perpendicular to :the southerly'property'+:line-."'- ;are lieo' be deleted. ! .'1,. :f2. •')o ., i,rir;. ._+,,..'3'. ;1rTF.:�f,1 ' Commissioner Buthenuth commented that he liked the original plan with the lawn rather th.an'liave the: parking"there:' Commissioner ' ` Puetz said he would like to see 'same'-bushes`'screening' the ! '' t !''i'' ambulances.from"Stevens Creek Blvd: AYE'S: Commissioners Buthenuth, Puetz, :Chairman'Meyers• '-'.'' ; i NOES: None ro".) ABSENT: Commissioner Hirshon Motion carried, "3-0 7. Application 10-Z-71 of City of Cupertino: Prezoning .58'acre . from County CG (General Commercial) to City +of :Cupertino'1CGi, (General Commercial) ; 5.54 acres from County CG '(General ?• Commercial) to City of Cupertino R3-2.2 (Multiple-family. Residential 2200 sq. ft. per dwelling unit;•8'.'47 acres*,f•roml County R1-10 (Residential Single-family 10;000 sq.',,ft.: iots)° to City of Cupertino BQ (Quasi-Public Buildings) ; ;and 3'.76' ' acres from County R1-10 (Residential Single-family 10,0001 •' sq. ft. lots) to City of Cupertino T (Transportation) . Said property, consisting of 18.35 acres in total, is located at the- southwest corner of the intersection of Homestead and SLelling Roads. � z �t ?S:•'� �l Y:�j,ink aw�Cr,. '3P?C�tir•2r•r`��lL`��"h.l.• - -�' _ _ r�>ti�J ��wa.:�r":"... '-al' �LS=iE:~+a`'� 'hxus•�.x'�•Se 1'�"y� {n. c�?...�-s' �,::n,..,y x :.trra:Nf t���" t rk���tµ��•,�%�tx�rr a� �^1?"#'r,j t yw'£�i,.. .�; 8. t-.. .�.k •.• 4 rr•� ,t 'k, i ^ y.t �.. N r•� P � � $ 5.'�. r { Y A `�. �tilS� y �F+k�bx. �'° ° >,7�1�.�Mpd' c.;i� ,� ,. , f .,'4 fi��l��5 r i yl;.S w 1�t'kS•�` d t'ii � '-•y � n � + > yy �S .. -.'. .��S q ,�.Sta!-,�, wy tjt' 4��h3s� 'iaj S5a•• a � MINUTES OF THE JULY 12, 1971 PLANNING COMMISSION r.. , ;, f r ,�,::.:. �r. } .:° . i.�z:;.rss1, >,.01�•IT��Jrrxf� Page��llte ® � vM1i r• ` f, tit?'f '1l c :r��l�f�'Y<�l'+VS�- Srr,,,� THE CITY COUNCIL AT ITS JULY 6 )!METI.NG REFERRED ;THIS-AP BACKfTO*'THE`' PLANNING?'COMMISSIONt'FOW'A REPORT.TO'CLARIvy A.""', IN THE'"ZONING .PREVIOUSLY GRANTEID'-BY-+THE* COUNCILr,AT-,.PREVIOUStq(rt'- rj! MEETING. q*�' `,•t> ��t v. :1:if3 .1:,.'S Ur' I! i ;iir :I..%1',i5 ; ,r.l >U r.{ i!'(rx.T,� }.3 f i , rI+(1' rf"`,:i•; Maps indicat'ing';existing"and, proposed,-zoning 1or::the::-area•r:•in•,�!4 :5s, -Rr '.'�iiaz;' :arv;• question' were placed• on' thd:bulletiri!board-.,;. •The,-Planning:.•D r.ecikor recapped the' 'previous hearings on 'this: by.? the; Planningl'.Commissi=ont and -the City? Council. ,. s(,, , S+1",; �iul.•. ?nr � .i: ' �:,i',)');•;,. 7: r '.r;r. Commissioner P.uetz said he felt•:there •is°;enough; commercial :prop.ert in that area. Chairman Meyers said there is also quite a bit of multiple in that area, In light of recent actions, it was moved by Commissioner 10-Z 771 Buthenuth, seconded'by Chairman 24eyers to+ approve +applida!tion C' approved 10-Z-71. 'AYES: Commissioner',Buthenith', tChairman'Meyers NOES: Commissioner Puetz � 'ABSENT: Ccnmiissioner,H:rshon :,., • `: •• 1,! • •• t':, Moticn'c:arried,,•.'i.2-1 ,i? ,'t__ ?!I. Commissioner Puetz` said his reason 'forihis-negative vote is.:;the.*ut feeling .that!,if- there' is a�necessit; for additional::.commierciali,_t.; ) zoning-in'that 'area-;in -the•:immediate_future- he would nbe 1theifir"st to approve it. It is- easier^to'•move'up l to'•<commercial::zoning:r s:jd 8.' Amendment to Use'Permit:-110-•U-71 of,,EdwardYamaoka;?;applicant requests rermission to defer the:•.restriping�of::ther:parking;o stalls in the Portal Plaza Shopping Center. Director Sisk said a portion of'•the. approval.?of.,the:Figure Salon:_: Res.triping of application in Portal'Plaza *incl.uded ;restriping of :the.:parking;..&. parking lot lot of the shopping center.' ThE:y:are;asking: for additional,;time•: to redo the parking lot. Mr. George Yamaoka, 660 Gale Avenue, Sunnyvale,- said he: has.,,,'; : . New building retained Architect Ed Meyers to construct a 1500 sgr' ft.. building due in Portal in the front in Portal Plaza. When .they. go under: construction. !;; Plaza -they will be razing most of the parking lot. The Planning Director said they would like to discuss this matter with the applicant before it is acted upan. kv- t 5t 0` M c �1 f a,Y F?V i a51� 7�t i'11` �� �, ��,14 ��t'}lar S'' f��.qt� , F � �" n..� '�i, C �, i �tll�E i�+•% t� -�V b r 1 ,,,t• r r3.�t.rd.Y7 Y'et�t; �r,,„ 'J,a-„tit-r,'�4�a Vyj l F•ks�t�'"'. {�i,,4`,� •+•r �1 ,•L.�d�7i t'rry. t . a .'i j..•'•t r P f/^.s`* (t ' q )aWk r,� j 'N” ! ...?`i !`r•.:1 r.7 t ''i`i(,J I t�i.1 r''�i(�s '1 `,1 It (.. ...:. .'t'd til. ..�l1'� '5 7�'3`•4�a'�,7.lrik �{`'t�'u�'7yhaerrt t ir PC-37 ,r,'d MINUTES OF THE' JULY 12,t.1971• PLANNING COMMI SSIGN'MEETING�!,`�iu `,�( �' `'r'; " gj " + t. a t r ;✓+ t l ayr4 t"rr, 1 a �Jt, ,® Page 12 'iUrr 'rttk� ,{ftri;E r,, t•. �r..:`3'':q•. 4 1'1 .1:'ri.i.,i id}' +.�.} r'r' r i Y 1• r' xt�r4 to I' 1 t1y yr, 10-U•-71. Moved•rby Comrstiasioner P.uet;z,,; .second.ed:by,,Commissioater;B et141t�tj�(rp � 90-day to approve 'a':,90-day.;extmsi'on;'op:;application_ 10-U 7l. -for„;ttYe extension restriping or the parking lot in- Portal Plaza.. , !? Kt)uc i`1 Restriping is Mr. Roger:.Christenson said;,;he,-,is;ethej tenant! fori-.0.q?rFi ,,,Salo li responsibility and they �i.rc, ready•ito open.,(;Chairman;Meyers) askedi,the, ity�Attorney;` � of property if - the a PP licanti,or: theJ property :owner;should.;be;ilioble owner Attorney did not. think a bond would be necessary_,,;in) thisr ca Z,. The responsibility for the restriping is on the property,owner,. �t'z not; the tenant:rof tlie7'Figure !Salon.;;r:,, Motion carried, 3-0 _!,,),1:1 9. Application -8-Z-71 of: Roberts SAich fppd Ralph;,•Saich for;-rezoning of approximately 12.48 acres from R1-10 and R1-10ag (Residential Single-family and Residential Single-family with agricultural' use permitted), to-P,.(P,lanned ,Development),::K th•.tcommercial;;:,use_ intended.. Said property is located•at; thee .nor,tbwes_,t corner,;,; of Stevens Creek Blvd. and S telling:;Road.;;;r,Denial„r.eco�mpgnded . by Planning Commission Resolution 905 of May.24,=1971. THE CITY COUNCIL AT';ITS'JUN1,:,21st:;MEETING REFERRED THIS APPLICATION BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REVIEW. Original plan I Director Sisk said previous•!action, by the Prlanningr,,Conission;;was a resubmitted denial. The application was ret�irne.d;;to the,Planning'tg9mmi$sionaby with minor the City. Council. : The .applicant 'was;;resubmitting;:the r;original,•r plan , changes but has stated;they. now would-.like: to ;have.,a,.5-foot, si.dewalk..and.r the other five feet would be in landscaping. Chairman Meyers saidlit: looks'as':though there is„an,,excess;_amount of buildings on the'-property. !!)xs°r Planned use Attorney Dempster, Attorney f.or the applicant, introduced Architect Dennis Burroughs.of Los' Gatos.••.'tir': ;Burroughs. reviewed ;the;,prgj.ect which was started in: 1969. •;He-set id.,they.have gzne over.;Ghe_,plans with .the Traffic Engineer and: thE:.City• Planuersa� . The,, two-story,;; building will be going in the back. They will,be.prgv;iding,,one,.i driveway for circulation. Thera will be quiet, •professional offices in the buildings adjacent. to the two-story apartments.: .Colors.-and textures will be compatible with the area. There,will,.be a, oner, story building in the corner, 5' rather than 10' side.walks,,,and;,a 25' mounded landscaped strip. Disciission' followed., Attorney's Attorney Dempster said t.tat perhaps this •ic a unique. .location,in arguments the City. Their present-Mien is equal to or more than that presented by other applicants, such as the Town Center, Mari.ani, etc, Chairman Meyers again stated that there appeared to be too much building on AM the property, based on aesthetics . Mr. Dempster said that in order to come out economically they will. need that square footage in the . 1 . r 'it..l t• r.?.V. wSj. J 44�l;:�!SY>S�dS';.. ,, -tk�, �'i yd M � 4�"(r"R��p''�✓<',Y 4S 3 t'�'f ?..{Y'�J 1,+ � "'rk_ :':: l :!, 'F- •�`..-,�i�.����'� �+�_zS��'�:as.;',::".•��jl.sr'.�.baiii�> f'"$}�.29t� t�s., ���r➢ `�'}_ , � I a„c�M, P '_ i- ,, tow `'~t Kws •[Ytt` ar1y �yy r ,�,yt.,. '41. st,k+',pAviti­1,10- it . .. t i' , y ;, �fiu f�, f�`tf'r�j��? y',,}• '•'t�ki. � g ir. .fey: t f�• '� p':�'�"`s'��Y t• 11>St �@ i+ .JAY MraX J � '' • MINUTES OF TILE JULY 12, 1971, PLANNING CGili`1ISSI?N+ MEETING ��'1� 5 tr, a' C 37� : b� •.�. 1 .. r r 1 ) Y f Stk f Fr♦S. 05 r i . r.i .?:. e��1 ) , 3,4�+r fit^ r, ►i� ,, 's x r r j r '�la�y 4�c,�),s�trur�'yi i. 1-+ _�I• � i buildings. Mr.. Burroughs then pointed out. that the rendering, looking down on the overall play, was"T dect ei.ving'an0 that��Che ';U+' r�t'� roof not only-covered the buildings but the walkways -'as'.'we A discus'sifon`•of -Planned Development` zoning='fo11o;ied' Thg.�City� Requirements I Attorney 'said' `it must' sliowi`•"`1').' Topography;''-'`}2);Proposed��st ', ofd°Plenned,•,,t+,, system, 3)' Areas' to•`be 'dedicatedi,'arid ::'4)'i Areas''=for commercial'.;r+:r Develolanent use, office use, etc. '.flies Planning:.Commission`+can--require'fsuchc;:; zo ing': data as they deem necessary. '''tt�'- The. applicant said Chere will be 5:X lands'Gaping'{iric.lud3ng''peri="r:�'a <f' meter landscaping. They have an adequate number of parking spaces: ;, The City Attorney said that when you zone property "P" you'do• this. Bui'lding size when you have development plans submitted and approved. -, Square; important factor footage of the buildings is an important factor. . Chairman•;Mey,ers;, ff' suggested that when you remove a building from the plan you' 1. ' the' requirement f,or f some:of. the:parking:,remove r:• s 1 w. ..rl 1.J....':? Mr. Burroughs said that looking down at the plan, you are.looking • Rendering at 10 feet of overhang as well as the buildings. Attoruey•Dempste i1clud.es:10' felt the Commission..,was.;probably giver, too complex a design too olj' overhang early. Mr. Burroughs'-said he would have to go back to the market 1 analysis 'to see if it is economically feasible to reduce. the � square footage of. the buildings. Moved by Commissioner'Buthenuth, seconded by Commissioner Puetz 8-Z-71' to approve this plan for application 8-Z-71 with the following approved with conditions: conditions 1) 25 feet of periphery landscaping i 2) 5 foot sidewalks 3) Minimum of 5% landscaped islands within the.parking`' Iot. 4) Minimum of 50% development in the first phase'.ti ,� ' S AYES: Commissioners Buthenuth, P'uetz, Chairman Meyers �.. NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Hirshon Motion carried, 3-0 t I i NEW BUSINESS 10. Staff Report 'on BQ (Quasi-Public Buildings) Ordinance. I Commissioner Buthenuth said the Commission will soon have another BQ Ordinance member and also due to the late hour, he suggested postponing thi Review set for matter. It was pointed out that there are a lot of "illegal baby ' ,`ugust 9. sitters" waiting for this matter to be acted upon. Review of the BQ Ordinance Report was set for August 9. $ i ' 1 d�St i�t 'A4r:ns�H v ,� gt tiy'•� 7 +t;�rY,yyi� i!Xi) v �, '. „' �' r`� 1 !.+'4k i�'�I� � y +. j�cL'�i 1 d C d�.t•,k 'C t � � Y a : •1 t �� f ! :• �t?�'j+t�t�.b1 Yra �s ,isy�7,�`tla 4 � `"�•;t,r 'ft t{''rs*L $ , � .3.4y �,,,� �. +r s , v 1 ar.i• � r1�cp ` ' t ,,. 'n"•5 . (.°ti��,!-at�R'n�.,1 utt t.4(cy;,y�C�5+s9`�t ��°} x� a r�'� s� «'f;'�c��i'1 p 4 ;��D�f ta'�'� t d `+`�`aF, 'tt`�I�c"'•i+ s a �. d� �lZ} r a}�,,�`ttr 1, f�} • tt v�,M1,"'`t'cc�`f�+=z r�4��>�a f+t �� µ`��Yr ���•r't,a�M�•'��t 1 �, � �a d �d�+�,hl,} �, tart,k 1rY�^`L•+, r� + yiy t °�= 'r>l1(i.i} f'C-37 (MINUTES OF THE JULY' 12; 1971' PJ COMMISSION MFETING� ,*�172nKS" 1,a �j �}is�' At', Yr ti' s �,��r�;��� ,�j*tl 1 O f Ilit) ! !:' f0 o'l 1111111 c I1 l'i i lo I lT Yr `� R�rjM1Jf11t�daS_r t'1�'�� s REPORT +OF F,,I.ANN�.NG,,COM�IISSIONPrR u w, It i ri ;. t l'IM1�t't7 in ^ta 1,li t) t tlt{r�[iiti r„#'<``n rs t r i.-,:'f i: �_3fr.I. :i.J�i n - f I,i(i •.�•f•� - a 1<Strd'1' i .': t (".;� 'i )117. Jr F uS.,.', J.I Ke `( (";t UL�3 F%, < , r. i s� ,c ^�. Service Commissioner Puetz asked the status of the planning�studiese ). 't Q r) 3i� F 4yYr F c;it ion Study + Director ;Siak.Tsaid•,,the;sere ce,sration,study'twi 11;be:.the tlatterzx�h in !august past of August,:;;Goal w:mustri,also,,b,erd scussed, soon i iIt�iwas I; •;LSf,t� ' brought out,-,that !the:,Planning DeJlarlt�hent• has Jost, ti} ear emplo��ess. , ',fit x ' so they are!short--handed: at,:Lhc7 pr.sentr•tiMe. REPORT OF:PLANNINGI DIRECTOR i•:'I+i '" i. tl:; ,Ilrir(:7 I;:;:+ :'r-1 �."r' {f;f : �r1x• .'„ uY ''I:TJ 7ft1. Nothing further. ADJOURNMENT t. . I'1:• n: �1 ;� ,;; .'... v;.,c: +r:c'.i Moved by Commissioner. Iluthenuth',: seconded'-,by Commissioner:,Puetz,,)f;; •,t,. ` to adjourn the meeting at 12:20 A.M. iU• ,<.'.,1 { (,f':. ;ol i:: • `� APPROVED . .. � � � .. • ' .� ?:a;lti'.?:'t,)',,., . .i. _,,. _'i J: :._ d..0 ist'�.c>f:f,� 1 ATTEST: ' .,! .'a'r,i,:'r: i' .'. ._ �:I ri;;r,:.i.r,.i::• Ci Cit- leek { ly�,` .,� y^- ,�: ;i ih r ^a•�� w�;{ �1 .'1�.,*°ki.,l�SMdfil(Y� �. •c'p.. Y :. .� •+ •vim '��'FS,�R�tt•J� ,