Loading...
PC 07-26-71 1:.[�`` �.' t��;��,a ,-ltS..; ,y.-:.�; .�'. '1_y i v wT,."`iV�i'!,!1 !x`�,� 'lt�i�, R' lt'�M�•Aj'� ��� ��lt'a"� f�4�{t1 ' �'ib•� . f i1: � t i f�•.s�c{4Ca �gl+��y.� f oti°��'�i�. ra yh}�-n '� y5,7A ; e NIT _ i1� A ' xFq� ,yjgwk E �� .T ' �• ', ` } 1J?Yl3 7�'� r �/� iy���`�Y��K ,.�,�JI{,�,� CITY OF CUPL},.,INO , State-of Californi�i , J{ ,,t y�,rxE 10300 Torre 'Av'enue', Cupertino, Tai lifoinia" ` +:` ` :''''�� ittty. ,',� »r �Jc4 Jz ,pageg,111 't 3 +ttrf4 j ,eirn'Y4�f ' s C Sign ' Telephone: 2.52-4505 5ej ..}Y!.:i1 ::)•vl .'3:'Lr.' '!' C:`•';V.i. �. ift'��fi��� Y7 'i-.(°„12jh 2�'�li¢tJ ie: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF 'I'f.1E PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON 7ULY 26, 1971''IN' THE''tOUNC.IL CHAMBER;:'CITY'-*{ALL'''',`-•';" CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA •SALUTE•TO THE FLAG The meeting.was ,called''to`order'by, Chairman°Meyers-a't '8 07-r?"M. with the Salute`to the` Flag': - •�I.. .-}l1 l.t:r'i 'i':•.;1�;.�1 tJrell":i"1 ! r�;.•fi:lllC(.: .17x1 S ROLL 'CALL F Commissioners present: 'Buthenuth, 'Hirshon Chairman•Meyers:% Cozanissioners absent : Puetz `''` '` "' ' 'r! J`'' f Staff present. „ City'Attorney`='Adams•)_ Planning Director''S.isk' Assistant•Plannei''Cowan ?:T%aYJ D: ,, Traffic Engineer Grigg Recording Secretary Lois Inwards APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes'of' June 28':'and July=T2},9'10 7.1 Sir ce all Commissi.oners''were'' riot present; 'it was move-&-by.'' ! ;:Approval of Commissioner 'Buthenuth,� secorid'ed by Co;mnssioni_r' Hirshon `to: minutes continue the 'approval' of :the':minu'tes until' the n'e'x'Lf meetihe' i continued r. Motion 'carried,` 3-0 '' �' c POSTPONEMENTS, etc. Application 26-11-70 of'Texaco';°Iric:::'==:',.t C 26°-U-7;0.;, Postponement requested' by'-applicant'=to, tponed meeting' of :August '9; -1971.. Application 15•-Z-71 and 14-U-71 of Robert 15-Z-71 and B. Ippolito: :Postponement-"requested iby.: 14-U-71, applicant to August"9,- 1971-' ' ?:, r; , : postponed So moved by Commissioner Buthenuth, seconded by Commissioner-::= �; '•t} Hirshon. Motion carried , 3-0 - .' •r.. �.r: .ra 7 s �• , y {I v;-:.u..' +ti>•i{lT� ?2``• 'u'�1 �'c �'�,,•r�v0 7yg't x�t y 'lkF f, j ;q -..b ., t.eih�Ytt..v i, �r;✓4r'e�o-Jbn 1�'� �t.L7�Ct�ISS ff�+ �{, ���ry '1�.t Y'�. s�,$rte � n•.< . • ;`S .F.r: �� t\ 7. t of�Wr��.n��,,� ''^t�' r `� � .. • ( i n "� Yi y4'f{Y'Sr YdS�q 1L r it�'� �t�n � � �41 `' r i 77 ' � . :. r .,,,. -•v y . 4 �w r k 3 �r�Y ���T�{14pp�f 3 � �t ��K! �F,Y''s••'" YY'{�4�t�i Nr .l i, I.�? i 1,( 4 3 M b�+rr �,�;{ y�•• j•YL75aY`tl,l �:'°�°'r<.,!4..it�Y�•, 1f, •1.,}'�t E:, :. �`tf1 'y)pn"i.Y'111�#,rt tku t 1 t+4r!' tf r' PC-38 ? . MINUTES OF THE JULY 26, 197,1 1PLANNINGi COI4iiSSXA�,MEET�Nur��rJ is • ...f,r , v (��>! t. ")'e 1'7��ir1. fC•j i°;)'�' t ,S. Page 2 a� r fi t t QL4t - WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS There were none. ORAL ' f T,..._I•i. :.f�•i.i;`�•,,r .�'. ,f�i. :.:is ir'1"'' `i.! Er .'i .i;TI c(% foul rlJr7 i:.4 -^�� ,,.. .t•,.i.7 COMMUNICATIONS,: Theria.were none. PUBLIC HEARINGS: ;4.•'. ;�r 1. Application 26-U-70 of Texaco, Inc. , for expansion of ,gasoline'"-,-. dispensing system in existing service station' at corner-,of;Homes tead,..Road,.and•,Sara toga-�unnyyale. Road,rfa�n^a`CG`f"°;;,:• 26-U-70 (General CommercialY-zune. First Hear ing,,continued::; postponed POSTPONEMENT REQUESTED BY APPLICANT; 2. Applications 15-Z-71 and 14-•U-71 of Robert B'. Ippolito 'for "' . rezoning, .91 •acre:;from ,R2-4 .5.i`(Res idential::Duplex.•4250. square,.) feet per unit) to BQ (Quasi-Public Buildings) , ,and Use Permirt.t for 33-bed rest hone. Said property is located 'at the, southwest. . ' 15-Z-''1 and corner of the intersection,,of.,Foothill Blvd. and. Alcalde Road.1. "... .,(:Ud 7Q 14-U-71 First Hearing continued. _'-,!,,!• r;r;r.I<i postponed POSTPONEMENT REQUESTED,BY..,APPLI,CANT....,, '.c 3. Applications 16-Z-71, 10-TM-71, 15-U-71 and 16-U-71. of Aldo and Mary Andreatta - and G & E California Land•Holding'Company -... .' for (1), Prezoning 3.5 .'acres from„County CN.;(Neighborhood,. ..ti; Commercial) to City of Cupertino CG��(Generai`Commerciai)•; ` ' f' (2) Tentative ,Map to divide, said,property.;into,;two ..parcel•!.;. (3) Use, Permit. for-:,service ,station, on, °areal One,; 'and". ' (4) Use. Permit. for. cocktail` l(punge on Parcel Two. Property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Stevens Creek Blvd.: and :Foo•thillBlvd. First Hearing continued. Postponed to A location map was placed on the bulletin board. The Planning discuss Director reviewed the previous proceedings on these ap,plicat,ions.,;i ingress/egres The matter was continued from the last meeting basical`ly`''to 'discuss . & channeliza- ingress, egress and channelization on Stevens Creek Blvd. and tion Foothill Blvd. Revised plan A revised plan was placed on the Loard. The cocktail lounge would be placed in the new 9000 sq. ft. shopping center. The staff saw problems with the small service road being so clue to Silver Oak Drive, The Planning "Director then ,introduced a.,sche_matic of another configuration of the buildings whereby primary access,. r would be from Silver Oak and temporary access from Foothill"Blvd:'' It also proposed a reduction in the size of the service station facility s , � s '�.vP.;: t ti,r yrr aY I�Ud.}� vi�'k•,4�7�S•Si}�j,"�¢�y,t'��3gtA�,,r..' '.'�; ti i' iii �,.' ; T. '-'. •...'`t"..• ~fvit>vttE3'st... +Ss�•[+€�d.Y v , 4 ; ,q,,..�.. •• t'.fA.• ��IQ 'N.i$vryw•a-atc>zti v .r, � - n ' a¢fs �tAu , Ali Y, �AF �� 1� kla ��} 1 q' '<� vyr P „ t T t, fit, s } i 1 4 4 a rz+ 9v. t rtt� Uf ,4� t 6 � 1��. 10 . K" l 'hv pg F ! 1 a s 5r Fritz ,��t zi a4 1' V.art` .MINUTES OF THE JULY 26, 1971 PLANNING COMMISSION'ME;rTING "'f ;4+'"R���c�; i,41� �C` 38 �$' f , tt, . .. .,i.. ,: ';Li; , ...!�? .1.s t.l :� ( t�L .a.lil 'I.f.yi t age 3 gt. Mr. Richard Hanson, Attorney, 200.. Third ,Street, Los Altgs, said the /3`'of. property City is 'asking` `for;1`/�3 'off the,pioperiy,"tb gb 16to ded•i'c`at•IoIIS'::'c}�Ita l c? t n dedications regard �to=''Silver•'Oak'Way; he! said(:they',are',•being='told to•1 develop ltr> commerciarly`,t' When',your gd''out� to, see t'the•-sitel, yoti see:rahata';i't'?•'is£i�:; 1 a residential! s rPet: An`dtin'regard !to' howAorig'it='will :b©tuntil it is necessary` to' close`bff Foothill,�Blvd% we pare talking:;=about.aat,! ' i least 15t'years. ` Mr`. 'Hanson'said'-t lip)'arc}iitect made.ia',;de•velopment:ir::.:> . Development plan plan withuut' Mr'."Hansuri!s approval -bei:au'se:�hei said th'ey!,do. ftot.,:have;i unauthorized the authority,'to ,do' this; they don':t•-have i(an •option,bn�­,he neighbor ing property. a.. (i1 t :.;4•. :t. .:tj ( C f,3. lr:;CtU , ., Commissioner Buthenuth said he would like the following condition Develop all at on the Use Permit: to"develop •the entire thingarat).onei'.time'; 1t9r._,I :•a': one;'time; i give it 'unity. Mr. Hanson''said''the, service':s tat ion -pro'per.,ty_+isal iz.i'.r. :: r: •n::.if :. 45,000 sq.' 'ft. before dedication and ;3-O',000`!:sq. fft:: after. 1dedication-. The Planning Lirec tor' said the schematic used the same:.square,1ootag as the application, but a different lecnfiguration,i:-r It?ishowed•:a',� :- slight relocation of the setviceistation. Mr. Hanson.said !they•would be agreeable to facingJthe'commercialr:;,:a:i ' toward Silver Oak 'as we1'1'tas':into=the ishopping 'center.­.,.­,:; � ! �'t'! ','. �1 .'1!.f'1; , •,r,Ir,;;47 ,.•]'J::U�i:.f ! ' Chairman Meyers asked the Planning Director +if:theyrwould' have ito.:;*:,;.: L-shaped have the L-shaped building:with: the' configuration'shown:in:afie :;::r' building Aft schematic. ' The Planning 'Directory said`:they%woul'd. •;:;:; '.; 'r. ,;.isci ,: ;.,_.,, Mr. P.anson said, with two-front stores; sherd ,would be no;:service;: i,o Deliveries entrance and deliveries; etc: -would h;i ve•to"be:::accomplished_througb �n front the front doors`.. %The Planning, Commission 'did:.riot�,object to this: a iioors i The Planning Director said the days i of:t-_he old:.service:!alleys l:are=:, ;> jjust about past. • :. i ': •, • :, :,' . ..r•, ..rr,r: ::�.•,.: dl�,�,;t�;ai;r: •,Crn(,.i.^:ulfifittl: Chairman Meyers' said''that giving up"the :1/3.jof.,the,1property to r' : ,_ 1two,-stqr.efront dedications would probably-motivate then applicant"to have-.,an,: ! excellent design for- the remaining-2/3' of-'the••°property.•;.,Ile-.was.,in•.trl favor of a two-storefront design rather than a back door.: design:,,,:•,,.,' Mr. . Hanson said they are not locked' into that' narrow•roadway.:;•:They .j,' One,rlong will be happy with one:., long, 9000 sq, f t. building"and•'the•:service? '19000 sq. ft. station. The Planning Director thought they could fit..thib 9000 sq. ;building ft. building on the prop'e^rt•y if they could reduce the size. of; the service station. f . f Chairman Mevers asked for comments from the audience. ; t Mr. Don Gaubatz, 10033 Rillcrest Road, Cupertino, said he lives -near } this property and lie wa,; in favor of the prezoning. The CG is needed to serve the increasing population in that area„ The,iexistin structures e,r. the, intersection are certainly in need of. sidew>zlks.,,..�, a` i �$,. 'i"h�,�t•`,4�.Y�+'t�"�1,L'a'iii`.t.�..x�.�''r-.,i+.•'�`�S�Szw �r�dF��� ��i�t� Y�Rr�''� .i- : ^n�t,q --{l^� �`i+'C y} �.6, 'F"� +9. ' >.-�z."+Ji^_'' __... •t.eus�ac. nu..uir�.�,'��aa�aa.�..'.e`citbaa.'����T�7�.fti?_ $0`4��.5���a�'�,,"± , >�°t' t,a.,•..r «,`:». f mb 1'°' t ��,��•=7^�11��. '4jy"�i!'*� iry'v iR�t+ 1 an Vr k } + - " 5 ..�; ,, �t-, •,t>.rr ,t L�r�i;tgt4;.„``,�� 1����� air"f s.; h i' 'L� �; '�u 1 >g f F. ,� +' t''4j„TnA11`+ktt,�• nr e '� l��•t y, &%'�t«..t ,`F! 0;1t 7d' 2f,��,7t'+Ya��11"'�i.�i.3,i('Dtn-tail PC-38 ;$!. MINUTES OF THE JULY 26, 1971 PLANNING COMMISSION;MEETING w l4', ey;"q� ; ���,( �4'r ,+ •, Page !+ ..'; •,,i.' I:t'.?. , .:•; ' LA , ! r, curbs[ and>.gutters!•as we'1 as new,,]auildings;;a He �questionedl;Zhe j„vsAi) ' proper•ty! split.) He:-felt •that•!ge.ne•ral3y.,: the largor,;{thc,plan developmentt;,the+better it 1s.•;,!Th!3.,;3..A• acres, #s,�a�sm }� area„'; ,•s: , t ',t; but it;would bei.be.tter,atthan;,tff,.developed; ndiyiduaily,.; He`€elt;py ; ts' :; , ''• the-developers would:have.;a ,f.ari,bei.ter ,:time% developing;'the,,,.! ; ,�� commercial, without.,the service::st4ation•..,4:He,;said there are. more,', than enough service ;stations,:in, the area;,7p- ,.one,,havino gone out of business'.i iaHe ;sugge.st,i& ;the ,app;ticant; c•o,psider,,;p,­,trag i:1 t in hobby shops, sport shops, a library, quick-stop market .znd,;{ t;, };,c even a medical/dental clinic ' . � :i •... . .. 'r1,;J .a ti i iN:)?. :'!77 iJi: ;t.', tl1,3 t!r! ')1:i,1.,1'�:i':IfP.�: C'.i - . Consultant's Mr. Lloyd ,Tupper,' Consultant -for,,(;. •& E.itLand,;Developmenc;,Companys•t statements said he would like to point, out .ttte„anti-ser�.,ice :stal.ion;trend in this 'area.- He said Humble,Oil. has ,bent:. ove•r, b,ack,,rards; Ito i try t.)0 7. . to please the City.. -He said: you,,c:an,!t, have a;.150 .x•1�4(space!€orb .;ri'i a service station when. you ;want,tart aesthetically,pleaFsing ,_ervice'_. ::c; station. They had to buy more .lan,d:and,;sp,ent.more,money,sp,itheyf I : could put in more landscaping, it, should be brought to the attention of the City;:that the•,property, owner;_hasypai,d ... .•.7 in property taxes _since purr(hasing: ;this;;prope•rty,. .,To,•a single property owner, that 1/3 of the property in dedications is excessive.. He_said:;the';City.IWould have,to,,pay;.;in.;excess,,of .;$1,00.;000:.) if they .decided..to put ;:in the !street :dedications ,through;•the eminent,.; domain proceedings. There -is presently„a-•service ,station facili;ty,,a;._ un this property. Only .a service station could afford to be on the corner `there. ': He said,they„could•,not even;.put=a;•;9-story,;bui ding on that 'corner and' come..oit., vHe said'„they•;donit�want;the; bar but there is a lease;that�must;bE;satisfied,,,so they are ,w 11 ng� ,ta to put' it in the commercial building. . its „ri l !'!i .!.'! :iil,t• . Comm. Commissioner Buthenuth was not against a commercial development Buthenuth's here. He liked''the •latest;cor.figuration:by the;Planning-,D�;rector,.� statements and he liked the landscaping.,with the •service station.,;:;He;.;liked. i , ,i1, the service station,away-If rom••Stevens- Creek-Blvd.,,and-;facing Foothill Blvd. !, i Comm. Hirshon Commissioner Hir shon-said •that•perhaps• it•;,would.,be,better.. to;,r,es,erve.. statements his comments because when he looked at• the•plen it seemed .to•!him that it emphasizes the large• servia_e station with incidental .• commercial. Ch. Meyers' Chairman Meyers felt the landscaping plan was a very good feature. statements tie would like to have the applicanr come back with .a. one:-building , ' design. lie suggested a more square-shaped building might be the answer. ie Gaubatz Mr. Gaubatz said he still holds reservations about•:the •need .for,.a..,,.,, r ” recommendatio service station on the corner. He said there •is;a 15; .to„20„400.,,1,.,1. elevation difference between Silver Oak Way and Foothill Blvd. lie suggested the relocation of the service station on Foothill Blvd. and Sil.ver Oak Way with tt:e buildings put down near the Foothill Blvd. and Stevens Creek blvd. intersection. t i z f /c17'fF.� i*' � y ���YY i'� �^5.'�� �h}� {v5`j'�•”f�1x°�,•j�p$i`��4� S t h y. t�k !'�u�s ev�i'o Y,_r��'ey_s,'.�kt 1� fi.'�'"i�'y`�'!�+ `e�l'��e'�9,.�'f r '✓L 'ric�'�3 ,,qA•"C Yk p, ,;� .., ,s' ziC.u ag;- - �• - _ -- �:��,.-...�'.sr,.-,•.a�_`�..- Q:si:_:�� - -�r._.P�'...,'�"`+��:Lf.�i'cza"'".'.�v',.'s'�.• *`.sT.l,.� _. _ _.. _. _ _ _- RUMP- 1 ,- t •'K;t`Y r +� t , "• "`tt4 4 C'�4� -s.Tlr �Y-:i. tti ,.tn`W��t''1z 4+;!•�'��y4ip4b. "6.2\ �JGx ��4, ➢; lr,s a }c• t `:i� � y., ,r i t X +�S.Y C �i� � �� }`P•C J 1' •�,' tij fJJ�°1���'•, ,ffj}. v S �.t ;�f4'V Sl ; Y �i�9 .l(`+u �k1'• �.(C,�.� �f; h . . r r�"y Ll� .t l �t � ,r r�t<� }-' ,��t�T�wa•��tsi r n�y,'],��q d�; �.'14i i. fy4 "ul ,3"x1. - 'l v , [ .f�. 4 /: 5''=- A, rr}����r tlSY �••'kt 4 tS• P A'��t�•�' i t W���`��,v u C . ',� •., , ,, ',, t `. .° "l ' t 'ie•S w bt �Y VM V v LiW.! 41 � yY 26 .197i;PL,.ANNI4IG COMP;QSSION�M>yETIHG�,,q���,'aU� ��x' =PG-38�,�Yf �< , t ,.� MINUTES OF THE a ha ' aS�ia• ,v l rPagC ,r5�4rd ,, r, i Cotumisaioner}Buthenuthrrsald hef„want+. tor see,a condition.,XA44iringl'1 IBaXs to,fECe e of er than to t facin Toth=•r hen Foot;hill� B7.v¢.�atxdt� the.service,:stations;baysra g �t•• t n i' rg6otl�ill 8 vd. ., site to he well landscaped:}y2: iar 1.,f y�,1�, ,4v., ,.,! ..!r} 11] •„i,� 4',r, ' •;Y•1;i 1 J7t.r:tl: ! J(I- 47Tr ?� r .., Moved,by :C,,)mmissioner•;Buthenuth,:,set onded,,by.,Commissioner Hirshon f > to continue;applications 16-Z 71 l0 ,TM-71 •,Jl$ U-71 and 16 U-71 10=TM-71, . 1 ,., 15-U-71 sud to', the next .meeCing. 1, ,s. ! :xlf7 16-L'-71 continued 1Motion,;carried, ;370, 4. Application 17'-U-;71-,of1;.Wilbert•,D: -Alva for Use Permit tonal- low the deferment of requirement t, underFV-und utilities onl, Parcels A, B and C of Tentative Map 6-TM Said property is located• easterly of anal:a43 acent,.to,i Bubb;.Road;,,,app.T imatelyt 4' 200 feet southerly of C11e intersection of Bubb Road -and Krzich Place in an R1-7.5 lone. First Hear.ing.,. „ ,• r;,'lt;,,,, Colored slides of the area 'in ques,ti°on,were shown. The Planning ':' Overhead lines Director said one utility pole currently exists on the. property."'.,' on'adjacent street frontage. The applicant's request to .defer the under- + -V properties grounding �requirement.•is because adjacent, pro,pert.ies,are..servriced,;* by overhead utilities ,and the removal" of the pne. pole would. tT� two 'risep ga ,either end is turn necessitate the piacement of of the property,.,:, Mr. Wilbert D. Silva, 11234 Bubb Rc=ad, Cupertino,,,said„Bubb: Road App licant's already has been widened. He said this one pole is between -two statements long spans,'and this pole would probabl-y ;remain.�unt;il, all,lines'a� in the area 'go underground. He"said P G S E was not in savor , of undergrounding in this area at. this, tune because it ;wo old l *,l� a . : .,•• ., require two "riser" poles. He said sidewalks, .,curbs,,.and rguCteris f}; are in all the way to Cupertino property line. He said Parcel•C is pres ently orchard. The Planning Director said the reason this .has_come,,up now is..that there ha: been 'a recent ;subdivision;of this property., ; Chairman Meyers asked for comments :from the audience. Theret.,were,: none. b } Moved by Commissi3ne_r•Hirshon, seconded by Commissioner."Buthbnuth; Public to close the Public }'.earings closed Motion carried, 3-0 • S cy c . ..t r.� i; '•�: ,iyw.A�yti 1pri�A�"$ �$af.;ft�?' , .. .. 5 r r..}}c 'e �'�`k' 3+t q t'cd• rr. �tt „+@ .I Nf.L;�� +t'f'�•xi�e,/Vdn�r �v.+,,�},_ �Yw< �d�i'Cg2+ +J y,�` ` ,t �' `"{ r`'�+'"� • t•- r ad� ^ar4 nt �,,t�x,v �F.��9'(e.• r?���"�Jkir.� >�k.t� � lY �! a Hti.3y�t.� ,1) �{y �.fJ�!• .s',' u{t � S it ,,>T1�t 11'} 4 T 4s'lad'��'•���,4tw C } l;t,�r �"tiiV,�t� i `��fY �` (is"Y" 7;h !1r s '}.Y o f h `.Y+1r 1-k„S n a Y• '01 li. ,{.� •x � 1\x-al' � f� .:� t 4 J('.1� x(� 1 . : PC-38 ' ' MINUTES OF THE JULY 2fi r197,1�PL ANDITNG COMM.LSSION i`MLETIN6' r' Page G t 1V,�t 10,4t 17-U-71 i Moved�'by i'Comml'ssioner'Riighon' sec'on'ded bytSCorirdisaioner fBd6h6ti C'ih 3{4y.p� approved with to recc?_ iend',to the fae' Coiiricil'''a ppsoval i of�appli6ation-)'17;-;U;-'a71';Ff',4 r conditions subject. to the 14 standard conditions.and s'='BF ) :f>r,l, r ?.z•:J'r 15. 'The'applicant shall' record a 'covenant on.' lot;':agreeing o f provide 'for'i the undergroundieig lIof.+rtilitieB.-e -as 'the overhead 'facilitled"along'°Bubb Road=are•f•,placed {under J ground. The said covenant shall be in a form}as '•approyedrtbecr.l the City Attorney. A. certified copy of the' recorded, document , '•;Y' shall be filed withr-the, Planning `Depaitment. Commissioner Buthenuth wanted to clarify that the ab.,)ve motion does not mean the 'Planning Coiiunis'si'on wise'deferringTthe '1.4"-s tan d ar d o ' co'nditions , ,;,. .I;r it, i. , �(t•. •rJ:r :�:, '.J k7.?_ AYES: Commis sioners'But hen uth; 'Hirshon', Chai`rman''Meyers-�.<;S-' NOES: None ABSENT. Commissioner Puetz' Mot._.n carried, 3-0 i - l f'}.r'.. •.i 7 7. ',fi'.. 't}..�.t;'i', i'I:i �: Ey'C,L.0 5. Application' 17'-Z�-711' of Ditz-Crane, for rezoning!''of3°3'7'.45'2iracres from`R3C-2.2' (Multiple-family. Resident ial'•'•Qluster) fto rPi:?t�: vc' (Planned` Development)' 'with R1C (Single=family Residential;:-f11:j . Cluster) use intended. Said property is located!-at;(the :)3r, .`,` 7, southwest corner of Homestead Road and Blaney Avenue. First Hearing;•,r ...r.' .. :: . :r�,;f' :i t.J;.. .. .'t :)s_::it.t'.f Present The Planning Director said this"property was�tprevfously,granted,ri'cl zoning is for zoning for a 725-unit' apartment project. -The•'pre sent',,plan ,t.sr'fort apartments the home;,'' to be sold individually.':. The•development �plan',was :placed on the bulletin board: Developer's Mr. Pat O'Connell, representing . Ditz-Crane, reviewed thez:elevatiuns statements and. deve?opment plan. He said their plan was to submerge the two-car garages and have a 'split-"level home aUove:c, :These''homes .will f.sell'f 'for $25,000 to •$30,000 and will' be' one-bedroom or two-bedroom.'units. The plan calls for a series of hollow cul de sacs with approximately 32 homes in each group. The Fire 'Chief has'passed this-conceptaof cui de sac with some very rigid specifications. There will be.25% ground coverage, 25% asphalt, and 50% open space. Mr. O'Connell' said they are in complete disagreement with the stafl:: so)heiwould' like some guidelines from the- Planning Commission.. '! 1xe:requested:; the feelings of the Commissioners regarding traffic access onto homestead. Road. :Architect's Mr. Warren Gilbert, 1515 The Alameda, San Jose, said he is the statements architect for this project'.: lie explained the traffic circulation problem. The staff has indicated they want a perimeter• street. Adih rtr''k'x� r f l.x: t4 {`x :� h'� t'!4�r`�'x J x t�'i§ . � '•' . t..t?f•.,•'i�4f•rN"'rft a� 1F.Ct:-�„.�,.�rr�E,�•+t7�' 'f'4. i r 4 h � X� 1.,� �,� �r }&8'r�� '��` ,e t� ..Y � ii6 �+ ,f� "t'6 �u�• X r -} J�''. �. i ' S.. r--At -.:� :�i..sit-'�p�s�^.�."�`EC3.._�....,��'+_s..�+:y:�. -�• 'n;a' m, ..�ci:.,�-�? �•.: ' � ��i,'"{"•"�A�� �r°.<���JK3 c5,-.7. pS��4 'K?af�Li;�,3tf vV i'�, 17 r \; `� L .� +' ' � `.i;.�n,..;Z('� l 17 ;'•��q.ari ` � `' �1{'1°,r"`�+� ?�$+1'`.n?9h `4'4 7 iti�'1 y�`.�i 7 1� �� 'fi-.r 1 7a, MINUTES OF THE JULY 26 1971 PLANNING COMMIS.%ION ,MEETING � 38 �tf�s��rY 1. :.,,t,• .'al` i..a:i ,i', til.i is✓`i,ff''W`"i f 1 l't ge�7i.l la tr ' y YL �rptn tr.u r The architect felt that widenin Homestead and Blane will rovide p r,imeter g ; reYS• =1 i'• ,{; ! dy Y �f;p r t7 r. YNe t qt' the necessary roadway's rather than a perimeter road within tNe' Fr!ir roadr' F, oject They'will provide the" ramp' on the SoaitN'. Two additional; , k �4k� ; openings onto Homestead Road would allow eliminations of'<portians, ofl the frontage,' streets. ' ' rr= .. i ;i. •S•r.; !. . .. ;( 1'nr.r., ta,,.a >n,. r,,:. ,'.. LC.,`? � , . . �?:.., . ,'i Mr. Gilbert said 'the `common 'areas' are' 700"'x' 200'' in&-200','x• 1001-,"d-`7 Common 'areas' �r.-7 There will be a` Homeowners Association 'f or`,maintenanc'e of th'ei openi" and parking areas. There are '2.5 picking spaces' per .unit,;'`a tota'1 'of` 10E5 parking spaces "for these one' and �two-bedroom"units r ; !: I' • r;= .i I'r.• ,i..i `'r(: "l'. .11!'..1 i'i .� : '.'. .y a f•r t .r f t' r ,,.': Commissioner Hirshon wanted to*;know- what`'woulAd '.be''•included°.%in' these Reczeation common areas. Mr. Gilbert said -they-would"contain•:tot'=1otsl,,E:open, ='x. '•f,acilities plan areas, swimming pool, cabana, an open- - shuffle : n�rd, wading pool, community center;'­recreationi room, putting?'green ' end large'play'f field. Commissioner 'Hfrsh�on-;said' the(!pr.evious (plant' -' had shown a lake. The 'architect soid:;t her e 'is'ac tua•lly"tdore-open aa! 1 space with this new plan. s:,_!sA•t's�r: ' Commissioner`Hirshon• asked about`si.dewalk_s:i' Mr': Gilbert f said there'- `, idewalksr,:::i .:;. are informal 'walkway 'ar.eas 'througtiout the project:' They will be I parking lighted..: There -will'be•-no dark!,"hidden'are !s %f Streets will be 'f ;or 26' wide, with no street parkin;;:"(`There''are Fr ovisions rfor• guest-*, , parking.. Chairman Meyers askeu" i;` the ere' were-any driveways:(;'-,)°x;i.,::. Mr. Gilbert said there are 16 parking sp'acesiwithin each' cul',.de'sac, ' ! Their feeling was that when you have driveways there(is always '(the possibility of having to look a- a car jacked up and being worked on etc. , with all the accompany'ing g ease etc'; ' • ...,,:,; .,.:it 'Y r! ;,• F' f' i. Chairman Meyers asked what wovld,'prevent some`'of'ahe 'people 'from'!; , :Overflow parking dominating the parking'• iai' the center with'"their `campers;t'boats,: :etc1 ? 1 Mr. O'Connell said the homeowners' as'soclati•on-would preve,it over- a I f low parking from' taking the guest` parking. They,have'not- allowed;;;d j enough overhead space for campers -to get into' the garages';"and'. thi.s�' would be pointed out to' prospective -buyers. • Commissioner I Buthenuth was concerned about the parking' in this plan: i - Chairman Meyers said he liked 'this proposal to eliminate••yome.•of�,'':' ', Access to,- the frontage road on Homestead Road.. The Planning Director:dagreedr ' Homestead: Road. that three driveways out to. Homestead Road may not be too bad. He said this plan showed adequate circulation, i j Chairman Meyers asked for comments from the audience:., There ,werem,,r. none at this time. f Commissioner 11irshon felt this proposal was an improvemen t-over rthe previous one. lte said he would like to see the new -plan, incor-�-,t•• porating the sug;estions of the Planning staff before voting- on it. Commissioner Butheauth liked the open space but was concerned about 4 . the traffic circulation.. yy. _F f R l: .nN.x•'i, d h:s r�.{" ,v n!+, ,a�.'r�`� '�,+ur t .a ?� L}.,�ijPs S`•! 'i"`y :.i. ,yy y .y r an.�.�Fn •. i •. !r. ,t.t.i t Yn ,.•N !:\l r1h' ��t W 4 ;S"A�v�9{�J �a tle'?t�j�'6 r y�ct`�t�+�'' '�, ?'•s d�.Wf d, r x. *Jtl� � �'y I I yr, t "��: P ��yf,� t ^"M N �` : r 1 rt75 Yea, R > 5j�iw� ; t, i�n'k'��Y� `reXd4 S� a c�1 s ti;a � i t k' ..r,.r•t� i timtir.k< . v'r14.�i-C��''+ ' :- ,)�'."S t ylf.}) •^1 t'.7".i'i) ,i, r ",f f, �• .� ; �j r.'SYS l F „ :'t x tl FC-38 HINUfES OF THE- JULY ?b 1971 PLANNINING COMMISSION,MEETaPG tip �ft! Page 8 •,! ., ,'i .� 1 1 � '"'):i i(1 -t �,s '. , )i` t,lt• ( 'ft`:'�7}y of r T i ' - Commissioner Hirshon; liked; the idea .ofd ozne o ).;� ,,�+Ili €, h wnexslti p rather-than, 4 ,r... .l. ti Y tvgn ,7,ff `+Jfl.f'+' rental, proper,ty,,because„•the,,peopl4';sepm to'.�akel;bettar car kof 1}�x�F their own, property.,; ! _; + 'z �. rt:b r 71r,.t flr.;' ttyitsir!t+ 4J'frlti�J' fitc tll�ha, ;,' Parking Mr. Cilbert said they don't have to put the extension'. of..,.,t e ratio fron't'age road-,along., the,'fr.eetray, unless;,the Commission.ifeel� ;itttie important;..; Ile asked, ,the,;Commissioners when tlhey, ask jalioutt the prarking .if; they were indicating.,,to thee devulope�i tnat %iehe'y want s r more than 2.5:1 and .whether or not they can regv. re it Chairman Meyers felt 2.5:1 might be sufficient if the. peoplra"can' successfully { b'e prevented from using ,the.guest; parking. ,,,,Commis.si.oner Buthenuth, was concerned ,about where, all,,the ,guests.'.;cais'i4ould...go, with, 7.tu 32 units in a .small cul ;de sac., Jhe,Planning_,Directo.r .said there: is a different type of life.-,s,tyle rtliaan.in ;apartments.+. If,.,[hey' •, can make sure the guest• parking, i:sn'a•'used for"campers, etc through the homeowners'. sssociatian, 2.5:1 ;parking ratio"is;, adequate. ;r:•rc :r r:i•. c (;A?: t Citizen in Mr. Jim Small,-j19872 Merritt. Driv,'_„Cupertino,a,spolce.;very_.highlyA favor of . in favor of, this:projert., ,,He,,said. he,twould bP,yery happyrtorseef - project the reduction of-.the-300 :units.,frorn,;the,present;;zoning He-said'y: a developer: who- puts•-the garages,;under ground should be commended. Jif r>t ,9 Ditz-Crane does quality,developments ,,.;He said :the tentire 1• neighborhood will benefit, from the reduction in units.,. traffic' i seal number' of cars., . ,,/i.. ii. ii'.';r°. .;�;i1j :a:',s' ,�.6f.C.t.::-i ry:. •:i L_ii �1 . t Reduce number Commissioner Buthenuth stated that..rhaybe„400lris;.toor many units in A of units this cluster development. Chairman Meyers agreed. Mr. O'Conriel said this property, is..furt her;•burdenedr,byl the;.extreme .demand of, the: State, who took •a big; chunk,of , the, properkty _ Another- demapd r. is for the ramp. Ile said; this,.is, notr'.a,,goyernment subsidized, ,:., low cost housing z Q g project. They, wi.1. have; legitimate, FHA'loans:. The homeowners will a !• , probably be. "e:mpty-nester ." .1 orl,perhaps: haver_, 4, one child. Mr. O'Connell said they will,,try to, get, more -common , green and less, asphatt incorporated. ,into t`fe plan. rf: r rlrf 17-Z-71 1-loved by Commissioner flirshon, seconded ;by, .Chairman Meype .s:.: continued to continue application 1.7-Z-71 until the next regular mee'Ang, ;:F Motion, carried, 2-1 Commissioner Buthenuth aid not vote in favor .of the above motion. Chairman Meyers called for an intermission at 10:15 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 10:23 P.M. Aft • Y f I i t k .,�' �� '�{',�`"m r�•< ��".'rva� i 'xF`�``N h."`N._. !sh`":F,:. 4 ,L.+'.:.. ��i%^,^ ..4 Sx�;n !;;��:.hi. ,i _. _ _ _.—.. _ _! � � id�C.�wfi"�C`• _ v'C'T.Gii'_ _ '5,@'h. ; � ��;s h' 3.•.sai"' -ice �`�+,.,'!^�. � Y"'�r� {�'1 � � ����4°ti Vf 1T",<-a`�'�n-+'.. .,r�y,.; '��'Aa f �u rt'i�t�(.y:�`� eis 1�.�w,t..' :. s i •� n e ,:u�� ? ` 1 �y� I+�v�f gF�`�'v�1L . .. Z,Sit a°�WZ r` e ;? fi x d •',�'s r'!4 'S T r '�1'zt ' ar•�11s y'�1 r.. Y.�; 4� ,� yFr(,j , � 1�'i t'CLtt17�+ � � a1.T>,I} e� ,'i•e-rt� �i ,rf r k.>r C+'.. .. 1 � u i 1 tF w A, MINUTES OF THE JULY 26, 1971 PLANWING COMMISSION MEETING, '-'1- it t C 38r vlF f 1 t , 'o I .,.c(�( �1�a.f t �.r t �j, a l.•� I'd.r.;t.�T�1��'� y 80eR' ,, AM i ill, , 9t• r'.. 6. Application 18-Z-71 of City of Cupertino for, prezoning '..0681��`„ "' f'1''•'' >(' ' a'crea from;Courty ML ;•(LighC Indust}ial) 'tof City,,ofr Cu�ec , it Mbl,(LighG Indu>;trial) Said pzoperty ,is locatedyat th��• t r, :<'.., a r• Ir , ,'Fn X ,r v1U southwest corner of<.,I~he° inter�;c�cKion of Granada Avec�Ye ,and , ...<� .�. .:,^...r rJ 11. J, +rl.) �r' j. k,). C;]' Imperial Avenue. First Hearing "., fir'F}'s: •;. t;,.t: .�`•..•;*::'� •✓: ut, r A Record of Survey Map was placed . n a the„bulletin board. The Planning Director said this property is involved in annexation”` t',' .v t+ proceedings, which necesaitatesthe,,subjec,L, prezoning. Although' "' f'' =� this property has an existing "non-conforming single-family •' ".« . :>;;:,; ' residence omit, the .property is master planned and' zoned for light' industrial; use,..). Mr.:,Michael Miku,l• is tire'owner. , Commissioner Hi'rsho)t• asked; if, the. i,prezoning can :b'e c;onditioned "or'' if conditions can be placed on the non-conforming house:' He was told FFNo"••in.•both .cases. Colored slides ,wezer shown of the area. fT The Assistant Planner said for the past 4.- 5 months the-'p•roperty`r�.i Lot too small. owner has applied to the County for sing le'''family-2oniii�r,[iere';,j,6ut the lot is too small. Chairman Meyers stated that when the propert is developed the street dedi'cati6n'w:i`11 -take more of this property,. Moved by Commissioner Hirshon, seccnded7byi,Commissioner Buthenuth. Public to close the Public Hearing. I �` ~� r ' - Hearing Aft "Closed Motion 'carried',­3-0 ..v l.• ., . .. '( �i ��.. '.l.i t•r ..,...(.... �Jr�.i i. ',!'.,l'. .'.lV .1•Itl�`�„j.y. .• ' Moved by, Commissioner Hirshon, seconded by Commissioner Buthenuth 18-Z-71 appr to approve application 18=Z=71. '` "" "I �`• oved �; iO AYES: Conmiissioners Buthenuth, Hirshon, Chairman Meyers NOES. None . ABSENT: Commissioner Puetz Motion- 'carried` 3-0 7. Application 11-T14-71 of Santos N. Aparicio for Tentative Map to adjust the southerly property line between Lots 43 and 44, Tract. 3354 , located adjacent to and westerly of Lindy Place, at the, southwest corner of the intersection of Lindy Lane and 1,indy Place, J.6 .'an R1.-10 (Residentiil Single-family 10,000 sq. ft. lots) zone. ' First Hearing. The Planning Director stated the reason for this application is to adjust the property line for better.utilization of the site.i"?IiIt;� involves moving the property line southerly about 20 feet. The reason is for the property orgner to get the proper .setbacks. r .�wti, ,t� a a� _'�`.! .�'�:�•i �yYSi" T.r —�;�' .�81�">;'�.,c.z,�-'�..«`�+C_.�,"r« q. � ^i41' i a . a p My rz �J 'Y , n t "�i'xJili.�ir t .t r�...a.�•n> ,W+ tiI4{ �Y44?fi.,r'•,�.��Jq'f, c'1�5..Jq '� V. `f t � , r: 1`v� r.�„ •x+ � � g 5,r«,,,f� �'�,�r x i�> ^e��,� �iT,S -w c t i i� uar�+r S4 r t{ A• t +L r < '� k �,��-, 1,,�, y'r'o a '•1� vv.�'�a B Ji�l r G rt� f 1r'I f �r,C,xti:4t r•rf tK!C� S+(dfi.N4, /� I ( r iS( ttit o tT y c 4 t . '- ! r';''r(. :1!•' J•:{.1.. <', J(..I:.JJ r..,+�.� ,t r11..i.. .l.� .. �:'l !L%:� !!lj ���.� • a 1 syt F(n'a rryrl1 u e = ' 4 y. .. - M[NuTEs OF THE JULY 21, 1971• PL kNNING COMPlISSION•MEET IPG, , r, ,TsDf 1C 18 ! �':� 'a l'6 L 1 l0 :,1 :,. (rCr., :'J'fy '1C ;>t-i.:) ;3::!!J»:;•.d: 't+J ) L*t �s u a.a1��v X.i, •,,,•" Owner of ;Dir. liertiPrCJJMareus;! 1172 Mar'achi no !',Sunnyval¢y ., J , r ioirner: of Lot 44`. lle said th'e're is -cioi4ntent' on h¢ra d�Tr',:� 7�;'�`a,` ,?4 Lot 44 in tjr' ( a �a,l!to+, the hilt the'11 se. stops'cl orse to `the hill, „ 1R favor ' �.i(,i';(.j!; '.ir.'f..'.i ..1J...... .:1. !^..LT-'pCriii.i.'•J t' 'Moved b CommissiOner Buthenuth•, seconded by Commissioner liirshon ' Public Y.i t:I 7 f'4• 1+{ ifl t ?Y,.+1,. 2!) b [ �1 h y. tieariugs to close the' Public rHearings'. i;crrrli! ' :, 'r?.i, ! iC :! ,f I 1} 'lo; :i i,"I Jti.I closed nj,- Motio ,:a'rried; Moved by Conimiss'ioner'Buthenuth; seconded by Commissioner•'Hirshq*1 ' to recommend ,to the City Counci:l approval of :ipplicatfion 11-T:I-71 subject torthe' 14 staadard' conditions AYES: Commissioners •Buthenut'h, liir'shon, Chai'rman!'Meyers NOES. None . r , :iJri.r;.1.'. t•. r{'!: ABSENT. Commissioner Puetz :Mot ion' carried;: 3=0' • .. ,. �' i:' i ; ! ':i :. 111 i. ,,.. �f:ifi;i� +; i:J?'i Cr i'{ UNFINISHED BUSINESS: There was none'. a n; NE.4 BUSINESS , ;There was none. c ri7POR- OF PLANNING COPZIISSIONERS: There was none. A.t the,next..meeEing, Di'r Eisk'' will REPOT OF PLANNING DIRECTOR: .•..,�: {;rtt ;�.:,i:J.c;cg. J•;a;:qq.==., 'oa set a date for the August study session`. ADiOURMIENT I-loved by Commissioner Buthenuth, c seconded by Commissioner Hi'rshoii" to adjourn the meeting at. 10:4G P.ci. . ,. ,;•Ji APPROVED: r Chairman! ATTEST: Cit Clerk 5 .{:, k+fi'4y.L•,Y•Z t�,,.".,.,,� ``Sr"4�,:.a 1 ,'" V4�s"y7 ti 3 NY 5�v xt' hx E •Y 'R1 4y �14�V S' _ A _ m�,� -T�'? .:J �`..vf.°srd•-:?�p•r"�,��._.�.4r'�'�1... `y��l±nn`�'..?��-'ct'��t.+ 2"a'�Zi�sJS"�'.r 2 'v°� ,.�> -