PC 06-28-71 ,•^.",tyr = . �� '.y. '+yy+{1*tMriY d my Li •I
_'S E+ Y��lf
;44"' ,t:3rh�(st 4 "slr.��,r ; :sr r}yF1�:;b!7} :".y}tr ul �r'i�,�k f;5. { it , ; ta' }1 +Ptti..":s c �'3'� ���"t• `Z
v "R tt �( t( �Z 1 .Y•,ry
r% A �e£I
'j, , t,�p•rt,av# ,�,iv^rk �y WyyIS<i`'v1r S�•' GC'b,t�; q h+
` � 4» �, " a
CITY OF CUIERTINO, State of California y. t , } uF P$c6� 1 `'4 Ji
, ., �>. •ft: 1 •,� i�b SCI{ " eY' ,�Yl' 4! r
I 1.• H R ['fh Alr•1 \n E ;
'J li r�fat
10300 Torre.Avenue, Cuperti°no, Calj.farnia } Y 1
T.lephonc; 252-4505w
ry n{ r , l dl PsS t,Y"a 1'•?f'p'• y I ':I•�1 �.�
0 L i '�:}'J tll Stt�.?1✓��"rY�w
tkllt
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING,;COMMISSION t,� �
:+tl t ,, r :I r i rtAr ,itst
JUNE''28; 1971 IA -THE COUNCIL'-CHAMBER,•°CITY,HALL,#
'irr. r'1• ,i: '!1
CUPEkTINO •,*C
; ALIFORN
IA „ # •I,
TO
SALUTE TO
The (: ; r ,.: i r:... i :i:.'t;!r.(, ) r;r.t iii
4
The meeting was calledito'''order by'�Vice-Chairman Buthenuth, at ,• t`; "
8:02 P.M. .with the Salute to the Flag. "` r
ROLL CALL {
Commissioners present: Hirshon, :Puetz, Vice-Chairman Buthenuth i
Commissioners absent: Meyers, Chairman Irwin
r•
Staff present: City Attorney Adams
Planning,]) rectoSisl:'
:As'sistaiit''Pianier"Cowan
' Traffic Eiigineei"6ri9':9`
Recoidiiig�!Secretary"Lois Iiiwards'?t
APPROVAL OF MINUTES':`,'Minutes of June`14,L''1971
Moved by Commissioner Puetz, seconded by Commissioner Hirshon, Approval of
in light of the fact 'that`two'Commissioner. were",absont:; `to'deferr ;6/14 Minutes-
the approval 'of the Minutes of June' 14" 1971•until the'next'`''!_ = ' def erred'`",".,'
regular meeting `j.
•'Motio:i;carried, 3-0'
POSTPONEMENTS, ETC.
There were none.
• r•• 'a f: Y r:s
I i
At this point, Vice-Chairman Buthenuth told the audience that two .
of the Commissioners were not present, and if any`'of,rthe•appli'cant °.
preferred to postpone until there was a full complement',' 'this
could be done. There was no rs :,:<•nse from the' audience. "
I
r s, L ,s `�:��••yy yy��
' ..• , '. 1 k .y�"h �#�7.�p"`.^'v r�'.�strlik',�'�3'.�,7t}�?r i•''+ .
t
'-s+t.� a.m.. ♦ I.�i p,.Y, pkiy�.�1 r .1.,J.,;[+ �}W+at+ 1" l�', `$v<,,, y}1'^„}I Y -..>,N.� k,+•'1 I _.��'. :�
�.. 1�. S`.i.''_ 11.. >4.t 4 e Y• L� i t \ `. +rt { �'' h�1 l 1 `' , 4 Vic• r A
Y+M., 4 �l o, :r ��.'.s�{,,jt,:r,tl k�',t��t�"�'�. ra� �Y�'4�7%ty. ,rl�.:�r�y fi�-¢{1 eRa&'� �,� �,.� �+, f °L,( k 1 •'td 4�•., '�. �� � .X. 3
,:t � 'tiro, �c,,��, � , k..;L a \z'�"�.�,3w`y�4.lA' y,la..�} +� �?,txrv'�� ��'a+y, Ir 'r7vk�`�����'Y +•� �;�,��F �;
Mi.
p into ,S,
z My
\.. 4C°1��+�4k`�1,�4�T'�+fi�p�•"`,r��r 4'�tj����17t 5.. •\ l�• B.
°;,'''•{>�; i y:J '<, . '' 'y ''�t( L�t� 7'0�r 1°Y yY•k`�`r�;y�t�•� rt�? �•
PC-36. Minutes of the'June 28, 1971'.Planning rtCommission,Meetiug s r�ri� J 'tr},r ft`' 5 'r
. . ,.. w
Wage 2
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ' t'S��t''�
er,t:...`"i ;:!?'; •,+; }:i! 1 i t i :!, t, i ri '+s°",' Iar t''!r{1vxl�e s�.,? r a?eE!* +
The Assistant-; lanner stated ,ther.e:,were;ietcers,,regardingtthe,,Humbles;,',+'fY,`r;;,"
Oil application and application-,81-Z771; ,Y4i h he suggested-E.deferring `�` •`=
to the end of the agenda under REPORT OF PLANNING•DIRECTOR.
So moved by Commissioner Puetz, seconded by Commissioner(,Hirshou, a � f;
M9tion,,,carried,,'j3-0.r.f.t:_y
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
There were none.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Applications ;11-Z-71 and,:13-L'771;of Howard V. Horne for (1)
Rezoning from .R1-7.5,•(Residential.,Single-family 10,000' sq.•
ft, lots) to BQ. (Quasi-Public Buildings) , and (2) .Use Perm, L
to allow the operation:of.,a;•nursery school. Said property-.
is a residence located on� the north side of ailverado'Avenue,
approximately 500 feet east of Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road, and
having a street,•address..+of, 2039 S.;Silverado_Avenue.,, First,7<<;•, '
Hearing. . . . .
Building The Assistant Planner displayed.a ,site,plan;on,the,bulletin board. '
layout The red color'indicated existing ,commercial; zoning in,therarea}.i:r
A transparency of the plot+ plan was shown, indicating the main; .,
school building, driveway, garage, screened porch 'for art and music,,
a concrete play area,..a nature study room with bathroom facilities,
and a lawn play area with sand box.
Property This building is midway between Whitney Way and Highway;!9,,;•,itwo:,doors•
location away from commercial zoning on the: north side of the street. The
undeveloped property to the north is the Cupertino,Town,.Center,.,T
zoned P (Planned Development) with commercial intent. The properties
on the east, west and south are single family-residences.
BQ Ordinance The Assistant Planner said the staff, is currently stedying .the
study possibility of amending the BQ Crdinance to delete the. BQ, zoning,
requirement to operate day care centers. The staff h<s• tentatively
determined that the rezoning procedure is much too rigid for day
care ce:.ters, due to the permanence of zone changes and the high
turnover rate of operators of this type of business. • It is felt
that use permit control of day care centers in existing zoned
districts is more appropriate. On the other hand, nursery
schools which are institutional in nature, involving a greater
number of children, should continue to be regulated by the
provisions of the BQ Ord.'_nance.
� F
� � w, ,� +s �a^.0 '` �� � ;'�� �a�}� }x�'-`+�"fir`' t•_"`�a 3;�{�'�'���;'f�,q�c%�•�• * �. • ,„s t
s+'`,�iRS. #.v.... � .*'<„et .G•a.�.»,' '... �,s�u.�c.'?"a�.�u1:�G,Lti,,.� ". 'x. •,'r`�i,�..._r5�. ,st7 '"fie .r �..t,..•..'+',.�,�•"., Y u,�`lc;eur.+'r - ,ice ._ - -._ -
r
i
, d7�"'is,�^ V. +k. .� �`. 6yY 4 ? i-•- ". y;:7. j z
�'' .t . 5r .,��1• ? ti:; 9 w "tr ,7�3 t s
a ,.� 'i" P�
Y� !.=°f147� }�+W� �d �'�P'�'. K,
a>i7' s��' + f�rt31"ri w7nti.�+h {
�r� ��`,lug, �J'S
ir
;
Minutes of the June 28, 1971 Planning Corunission Meeting ,.F;>4±9 �F�'`Qj 'P,C{„36 il;
`'Page'3
® r '
Mr. Howard Horne, 20396 Clifden,Way, Cupertino, said he was�;��' `rn f 'Applicant's
interested `in a�xiussary”}ach'ool' wli-er, it•Fwouidbe.-tf�eaeible"'toy' =proposal
have 130�,t6 `35 three='t ,,five-year-dl'd ahtldren ' S'iHe 'saidi>:hel?haerk;J '7
had the-'property,'since'�Apri•l--••1'6th. w.Sixic`e:h'e"has' ti'ad r the,'pr'opertp
the''nature 'study room hag'i ad i-very' .:11ittil'e.}u'sP: I't'•- does{`not''h`ave,-,,
{t
cooking' 'facili'ties; but it'�doev h"4!-;bathroom4aci1i't-ifes=a'rid;-ati', i°o
storage 'aren so it`16:,ideal"for"'the, proposed Fusel `' He 14e id
Silverado is 'a relatively 'quiet. street land {hid use;'wo'ul'd no'
t�''19" �, a
create undue noise. He said he wanted tc provide a't'child�'c'areJ "i;� •
situation that would not be on a busy street, would not -be''•in`'ai_t
sterile institution-like building, .,and would ipi'ovide-`edu6at16na'1 1.
enhancement rather than-strictly'a',babysitting operatior '-1P I"
''r.J
Vice-Chairman Buthenuth asked the applicant if Applicant did
agreeable to a continuance by the Planning Commission, as recom- ;, not want a
mended by the Planning Director':''. _1ri' Horne•'feltf'they'would'cthen.*- postponement'•
be getting down' to the 'same`lirobieiri, •'evenrwith th(i',sugges'te'd -''r' J.t: '1'•`'
amendments to the BQ'Ordinance.' ' 'It`'was brought out'`,thatt'nurs`ery"
schools require 'a 'State license'and i day carer centers:"regxiire.*;a <Jf1
County license. 'Both:have'-stringent 'rules rand"regul'Ations :ri
.. • .,r.. , . e,r,, .. . i-i�i1'.,li .-i� ;rt:... ., , :i,?�fir.., :-r:�F:'1.. :�,,, •t(C?¢ `e�'- •
Commissioner Hi rshon asked what�i the Caxisti'ng":use='of;•�th'6C<rp operty"; Anticipated
is and what-'amount'of 'traffic is"anticipated 1.by''the' ;proposed use_ traffic
Mr. Horne said this is presently a'r.1asidentialhome: "Because=of S'
the age of the children, they will!-hiver�to be,brought"to'the'.? _'• r'
.center and picked up later, so it will depend on how many childre
are involved:' 'He said thei'little'trxiffic igenerated rb'y')thisi would.
not be detrimental to the neighborhood; it"is'not like''a 'public '=% ;tf ' i
school where there are hundreds of children, f'
Vice-Chairman Buthenuth asked for comments from the audience.
Mr. C. A. Crumb, 20415 Silverado, Cupertino; said-h6 Iives, next: t; Neighb6i--feels
door to this house and when the gentleman came around to talk the- proposal
with them he signed for this-to be all: right.;'"He'isaid'ithey,gotr",-' was misrepre-
the impression it would be about half` a' dozen children and;the;-,.,;i sented
possibility of rezoning .the property, was not-mentioned'. i!t ,''1 = c=; ;; '•..
He now feels that three dozen children will make -quite a 'racket; .
and quite a mess would be created and. might involve people''in' the
neighborhood wanting to sell their homes and get out of- there.
Mrs. Norman Tucker , 20365 Silverado, Cupertino, said she was Concerned '
speaking for herself and her absent neighbor, Mrs. Claude S. about rezoning
Gaines, 20375 Silverado, Cupertino, who lives two doors away.
She said they are not so much concerned about the suggested use",', F
but are very concerned about the possibility of a rezoning.
There is considerable traffic on this street now, due to the
commercial on the end of the street. She wanted to know what
types of businesses qualify for a quasi-public building besides 1
a nursery school.
MW
�y. a ti i'd7f°r 1 F�ggxt; �.
,i1x .e;'BJ '+,x}1c.uel, t.s•,';c3.y•
t
L •
W.F' t�.,.,_��[ d S 7 .a.y+ �. .
r^•. .=::E r4Y•'n,y �`.t__�"_^�'`�_•u-.a?�*�.9:.�rilLiiSlesiat�'�'.uL+.`'L�,`r`tC .r'�� '��.�'_ S�r's.r"` _ fib-`"'y'g+--,�'Po'�;.�+
I 1•, !`.*•F;'r'.� ,i �.`�,R"" ��1a�t yt<',*��-1.�?l A,+h�T��j'sl�[ )(�-t,iw�y 1 '�ik3t t� Y �T�� ; ,n M L{S '!1��t'F
... T z , ;r ,�)• �J e is Y�' > tfi tk s�F C i Sand `x` nt�� )S' �'�1 Yy"•
w � t{r4;t ftMcP ink Nr3nt
t^f4 -htn?���};'7t•� a,r 3,;,�'� �`�t'�^+ti �� i .?� q ti'
= trr;,, r's,1J �.O\rn.2ut•£P'r�*y. r� �4tsE+`� t'
PC-36 Minutes of the June 28. 1971 lanninl; Commission Meeting
Page 4 3.
td O,Fr+
Protesting . .• : Crump
,, , :2U415,r,Silverc�do, , Ci►pertino. ,,;said fwhenl,they, tel�nk c4'
Mrs C + A y
neighbor witli,Mr..; IGorne.,they,.dd,tno,t. $e« at:f,ylLl•n,and,accuxate picturwlofn;the t, ;� �`
proposal_. .,;She.;asked; ifi there, will;hee,Ia,sign,or,spgciall,;decgra ,i.gnir��
4 ..
of some kind. ; She asked what ;type .ul,t-,f,enge will 12ei,put .up ,Sher ,5
also felt,that 135 .is, an•,awful•;lot; of, children• and,there F,Will :Vera
lot of noise.. , �+nd .referri tig,.CO;;the;.aipplicanC's;mentio,a
schools in,residential areas, she said,,therepis.ra,large'spaca,,b•�tween
the schools-and the•homes. , i r; t.. .• .'! <rr: i:;r(ti f:^F7 * n �,' ,
The Assistant Planner,said that in order. to,;.change(!the,,use,- n a i,,
PQ zcne they :would have ,to.c,ome ';in,,f4)c-,a Use,,P;erm t. . Includedf,ia
this category are bus stations, substations, swim schools, and.
nursery- schools. ,..; t
', � ,, 1 •:, ,':.. ) ,, ,' '..i'. :1 r'' a.:.. 1 is i :•..., i,. , .;] nt nty:S •',
Applicant 's Mr. Horne said ,!.he ,only use, he:cou.14 ,visualiz,e,,jor this property,,is.
rebuttal a nursery ,school. , Be cause•o,f the„nat:ure•i pf:,.the;,Iocation;and siza
of the,lot (1/4:3cr;e), it is,•perfect for,ta ;nursery, ;school It;.is
not an .expensive .locati(,-n so!it;would.;not be3.;financially 'pLOhi,bitive
for the parents.•• He ,saidtther,•e.,is,a .def.in te,ineed..for.,ainurse..-y,)
school where children can be helped .i_o develop, and 'the price should F
be kept ;down.so the:parents;,can,,afford it.,;.,;In•;light of ;thej:.faet;l s
that some of the :residences ,on:,Silver-ado.•are".,ia.lreadyi;%zoned
mercial, and the location of,:,th-_ property, ha felt this
ideal location• far,:his proposed :use.
Public Moved by Commissioner .Hirshon, seconded ;by Commissioner+,:Puetz tor;
Hearing close the, Public ;Hearing iri ,i ..,, ...i.i
closed
Motion caricied, 3-0
t
11-'L-71 and Commissioner Hirshon moved, seconded by Commissioner Puetz to� deny �.
13-U-71 applications ll-7.-71 and: 13-U-71.,,!.. J.
denied , r!,::, :;.iii:
Commissioner Hirshon stated''his ,reason: for .the, motion,.is:,:that;!
basically, this is too much of a use if or,:this.:are
a.,: We,;are,;,still
Reasons for talking about a mainly residential axea._i He, seesrlessE,of a,•rprob,lem
denial with a day care center, but: when you�are; talking+about; 25 to,,30; I 1.
children, this. is not the place for it. Commissioner Puetz,.agreed.
Ile said there should be a minimum size lot ,for this type•,of, use,F;
with restrictions as to location and proper buffering from a
residential use. He su'49ested 200 feet of buffering, and;one-acre lots. ?'
AYES: Commissioners Firshon, Puetz, Vice-Chairman Puthenuth,
NOES : None
ABSENT: Commissioners Meyers and Chairman Irwin :,;,;
Motion carried, 3-0 ;,•,;.;-, ,
7
1 y'NFs .a9 .,.' �r �e�"s� "sy w.,. n'+�'bfi: •rh Cu.;rrT'=tr3. K` �t 'e .., a�.. -_ _ __-___..- ---- __,
q•... � .air .�.. 't c5v: h.•
• 4.r ";:,.,�>k ,y n aT'1"t' en:�' `�.e ;�� y j � �'i .,�.�* x 1 a w ' � - F a _Y�+
. � .4 't� ��.`• ,r,��•a'r j r 4��2�ti �+1�����'�`c+A!�E:�,ors lY�i �''P•5 rt�,,��,��Sd?,'M�,r� '•;��, �?�+� Sr, t kr,;� t ?^�Y: �. ,�fi��wn.1 a,'r is
}, 1 ir,; ' P r 1 `✓l,r r er; y„ -. n}
p .Sy
�Y�
.. �r + 4r.� • , Pn#H�, L F1A'IJ `_�k i > rlr re� Yt"'l
r •,... n ,tr } r y, Ott s S rf S hk� �tR g
Minutes of the June 28, 1971 Planning Comissin Meei d,
;,ld'J.�.'a.1.1t•i ryt; 1 v..r.l tU::C;�• , ,t S:t';1., ._ .. .�,r 1 �i Flti i,�71s1J tt# K�.nJU ,�'�C SIC agQ��s l� � i.
VAt ell, `31d
Vice-Chairman Buthenuth told Mr.. Hox ne about his right of appeal M
to the �City•Courici'l. r y; ! 1r:1: !', •,� j;' XJ:: .F,!. _„ rGFtu�i>``il ?'{}rr {3Aif1�.�.,
• 11:.. +j •r,..l ! .. 't. •n. l','.. r f 1 ;Y '7.4 C( ! 'fit{f'Ytr i ts'a`aa l
S'. .. •..i I •rr t7 'l.+ .Z r. r,tf l
,?�'ff tl L �
2, Application •o€ ;Vallco.Park for amendmenta, to Xse':k''ermitQ`� f '
:x141 7t l
5-U-71 -and:6-U-71"granted for r uf'ftce' buildings. and
to be located at 'the southeast cornerrof'Wolfe'•.Road and•ti
Pruneridge Avenue.: . First Hear ing:i:
' :i i. ., , r. ic.. 4 .... ;rr.1 .... +,:,. ,!7 i1=J'1;lcf�;•<J:a.. .
Planning Director Sisk said Use Permits have been granted for.,bot T.x:affic,
of these :f aciliries. •:':+FQurt.site-pl.an.soWere placed:r.onri;the bulletin circulat•ioriu-:
board. The requested modification i.nvolves.ra:slidit 1of,,,bui•lding, -
locations for the hotel complex and a redesign of the vehicular',: '
traffic circulation pattern:
It is additionally requested that the number of rooms for the'hotel
be increased from:240 -to ,250: The• combined total:,square footage':. Modifications
of the office/multi-use buildings 'is, to be reduced fr.omr?117,';400,;;.; 1 +•
to 98,000. The off-street parking requirementifor:••thel first`iphas
of the hotel and industrial complex is 964 cars. The amended il• uLln _}; :•r `
site plan in;licates that 931 parking, spacest,areL'being;,pr.ovid�ed:.-
Although the applicant is 33 spaces short this only amounts to Parking spaces
3 1/2x,' which is ,relativel y-,insignificant,:,particularly.Jin;iview�. .
of ,the fact that the parking requirements for.-theshotel;Mould be
minimal during daylight--hours 1t! ':assumed..th`at••as large" per- J
centage of the restaurant patronage ':l,be:generated`,fr.om Varian '
Hewlett-Packard and the proposed Watkins Johnson:
Commissioner°Puetz remarked that the~PlanningiDepartment.tisri Parking ratio i
presently locking at the parking''ratio•.of�,4:1, for :restaurants. .
Director Sisk said this is' true, but'•untilr,the�.Ordinance-.is'',
changed •they'must use the' 4:1 +ratio. :: •u:' :„
Mr. Walter Ward,•General Manager of Vallco:.Park,said:perhaps the Mr. Ward's K
parking structure may be higher to the East and lower to the West statements
but this will come up at the second phase. The Watkins-Johnson.,1
building is designed so the employees can..walk- over to:.the,:; .;�.
restaurant, as will .the Hewlett-Packard people. The area around •
the pool. is larger than the original. plan... • The; signal and;'':' ,..
sprinklering are on the original Use Permit. +
In the event this is approved, Director Sisk. said Condition i5 of `{
both applications should read Exhibit A-4th Revis.ion rather than
3rd Revision.
Vice-Chairman Buthenuth asked for comments from- the audience.-
y
'g.
i;
• 1 y �$ t r it +
C
� y�y r,?
'1 a
J
! °yy„�S B �,1••
ea
• � Jl�' y,oAy, t.. r kktrtri,,: � �4y�,xh i �”+M� ` iySv( fP''"r v •,,z? N c
,•F + i F t1A a.t�' ��l,�,A w� fyi C�t,�,
f u
�� >It ql �t
_1k,
t tt: I `,h,� t a,}p1. d! o•4Y4
(. tr;, t:Jli f! •.i t •! ,,,,r.7 iSl,i t+ltx,. �r i { i„u.. r17uI.! r!a S o, p) 3luatlu �1N{P{ flr r41� ai.
PC-36 i ' Minutes of the June 28, 1971 Planning. Commission MeeCing
}gage 6
C• lit �7 ! d l �i il..'r•ll fi 7fi.,+�ti +i: 7,.i S.S 1 (� Lt!! A tuvi Ztt-at li kii�`t�tir,isy.
Protest of Mr. Joe McAllister, 3774 Pruneridge Avenue,,said
.;he+would,;71i1Q;5tA
hotel use bring up the question of whether or 'not.',the peopletwantti=this,>`�hotel
permit building. He lives .9 mil down the street. from it Iie,hast"been 7V,`
trying ,without'•'success Otto:get a,•refe:r.endum!going. r,CAEtet,consu]ting
with 'the City Attorney,; vice-Chairman:Bu thenuth said tjttiiet)Use'.P6rmit
has been approved, by -,the;.City Council.-e, At'.;this i ime<:thec!Planning
Commission is merely amending this' Use)P.ermit•a•).Mrs ,McAl•lister was
referred to the City Council, which will meet on July 6th at .7:30. P.M.:,,:"
Public Moved by Commissioner:Hirshon,- seconded-rby:Commissi6ner•''Pueti; to
Hearing close the Public Hearings.; •,
closed
Motion carried;,
5-U-71 and Moved by Commissioner Hirshon, secor!ded:,byiCommissioner•,'Pt!etz.i:to<<
6-U-71 approve the amendments to the Use,•Pe!rmits 5-U-71:and-6=U-7,l:.witho
approved the following :conditions: r.t;
w/conditions 5-U-71: ” ,,':. l.. • !"! ;! i�r ( i+it 1Lr { t,
1-14 Standard'-Conditions:. • : :1 }:`-,'• rtf 1
,. I! I'. . ;- ,. .t(!• ..A .if{i
15. The use :permit,;-,as amended,.•is! granted.ifor-fthe landwas ;described
in the--application and,;any:attachments:;theretoriand'1as showncon
the plot plan -submit ted;a lab eled Exhibit,_As4th Revision_:dfri' r
5-U-71/6-U-71, -first Phase-. .. ••• ? .'!f fl.1 .?cr 'a t; ;r,
16. The applicant shall bear'a proportional share, as determined
by the City,-.of: the cost of provid'ing;.signalization.iat the;.')
entrance to the' property-and ,Pruneridge Avenue midway..between , .
Wolfe Road and Tantau Avenue. t!+Said: signali•,shall:�be installed
at such time as warranted byt,the: City'!of:.:Cuper,tinoi.� Design.,of 4
driveway approaches and traffic: control devices shall be
subject to the approval of .the.•City Engi.neer•.ir:i..; : `:! f t.:,' •.
6-U-71
1-14 Standard Conditions 1. a,cr:;Jij:l ;
15. The use permit, as amended, is!granted .for!,the land as-described
in the application and any atts.chments thereto and; as`.shbwn:on
the plot plan submitted labeled. Exhibit A-4th Revision 'of
5-U-71/6-U-71, Firs' Phase.
16. The portion of the building which is three or more stories:�in
height shall be fire sprinklere:d throughout as required by .
the City Building Department.
i
17 . A temporary accesswzy shall be constructed from the perimeter '
road to the temporary parking lot for the. purpose of providing
emergency vehicle access to the south side of the hotel tower. AOk
Said accessway shalt be incorporated into the final landscaping
design of the hotel.
i 1 1pl q �5
1 t3 a3 ,kL e.
!
i
' kr: t• t ?' 'y2 t.:snag ° ..y' a } i• -
4 ,�i` 0+1 �?.j - .�Gi Tac: s ���,cy'�,"r�'Y .� �+� x �t •;Y:.
_.- __ ' _.—_ __,. _..-_-`'r` ...aa�i' ;�.5u��m'".f`k r.� si`1cc,.ki'h Yd�Jt.4 dSr_•"'�`a3i•_ _..__ � -
.;:>pt r�..,{^y"ti}.°y.,1sw4�•w�••.��,ji ��,``SS 'ri��Krr y�'.`•, '3,�i ^t
M�-+ta rho .fir, 6
4hy b(+°r�•����o~,; �-W�.t",�i��a��(A�^ k 1 1+�,r�'tCF'L ^ T,XX ¢ +'�
,'t ,}�'���'�' T���� -}},,5a •�"��`, 4,r I�i 73 5� 5�ry�l ,M1 h �fy '.
.����i •'a�'krt"Y tij�Hi�-§` t'-' '��,Y����`r��r�,a�'�`,���1 Y!� t�"+* '
Minutes of the
,tune 28, 1971 lancfinE` Commission Meeting a � r. t ;p� 36 � rT
i. 7 :,trt53 7 } f Pia eN7'•.1�s,
�+`iQ
AYES; Commissioners Hirshon, Puetz , Vice-Chas man Buthenuth
S: None", a }")i hfNOE
1j.
9 ] r
ABSENT,' Commissioner Meyers Chairman"Irwin
k 41
.. Motion!:carried',' 3-0-
' !, if t .,L '�fi+• ;7' � 'r, 1:);! , �S 7� rtC � +{ p1"�� 3'
, •• ..:, •� i . . f. ( rya r.,, C ( . ytr
3. Applications 12-Z-71 'and '3-V-71 of''Utah"Homes;
(1) 'Rezoning '4'.6! acres 'from -R1=7:511 (Residential SingleLtiflt
family 7500 sq. ft. lots) to P (?fanned" Development)t'with•
use intended of a 31-unit residential single-family cluster .
development; -and; (2)'' Variance!to' reduce`'the 'acreage•°regiii=e_.: ;
ment' of 'P' (Planned Development)`-from'•15'`acxes"to 4iWSicres `>`' 1
Said 'property' is located 'easterly'of•and''adjacent'tb-'Blaney % f
Avenue, approximately'500 feet *north of• Merri.ft ,Drive.-_(1V:;"H:1: '"'
First Hearing, ;
' ... .. .. is .. . a s„•�+• ' _ _ �'
The Planning Director said 'the applicent's'!proposal'is to'-build 'Development'
a 31-unit single-family cluster development:: The•ldensity; based.?.' description
upon units per net acre is 6.7. The density based upon the Clust
Ordinance is'R1C-5000'. 'As; al*point! of•'comparison; •"the tWestridge '' "•' r, r3?: ..i
Development' on Foothill- Blvd. is 10:1`''and' R1C--2900', respectively:': ( ��''' y' =" > '•
If the property were to be developed convent 1'6nall'yf,'a's''dup1e'
units with a dedicated 56-foot street, a total of 17 lots with
34 dwelling' unit's'could be'built', or' three•units'lmore than%
posed in c: -ester. Each unit would have a private, enclosed rear,.
yard and the indoor living area'is 1,340`,'1with; three'bedrooms and"
i.;1r,; :;:: z
two baths.
r' frt 'n !
The Planning Director said the�private' s treet functions'?as wel'lt1 '•private street i
or better than a conventional public street in that .there is a
greater turning radius for trucks and' (=drgency`•'fire equipment' j
and provision for off-street parking:' 'The City(Engineer'has ,r,<
suggested 60 degree angle parking rather than perpendic' ar`;?''
which can be resolved at tentative map and use permit• time " i .
Cypress and Deodara Drives would be permanently closed off. The
Planning Director recommenced increasing th`e•private` street` width•". �!
from 18 to 20 feet on each side. Colored slides of` the'area•were
shown. There is a 122-unit. apartment complex adjoining 'thfs' if ;
property.
Mr. Walter. Muir, President of Utah Homes, said some time ago they Objective: create
were able to tie up this property. For the past year"they, have' •+ liveable ti
been working very closely with the Planning staff and •have gune ! ' exciting homes
through six different kinds of plans,
He said the plan' propos°d 4. ;r
here is a result of that study. Their objective is t'o create' a ,n
liveable, exciting group of homes. He clad not object to the' 20'-
street width on either side of the cen,_er landscaped area.
There will be an open area at the end of Deodara and Cypress.
� , f
There will be a 5' walkway under the roof, dividing the homes. ;
i
r
- .. a..'�f.�s:•.vc.cw. :.s'cL.,.�..�•-�` .c.. aa..isx.,�-• 3.�s. '"� �;r_r,•v ::� '- -�> = �,a,ir y�E
M61 �`,� , F 4
.k'`1'$' o ,;lktyp]0+:t(•rt p .r t .v,tt5`rppYa.�'.r 6� lk t r1 `�
Atd' 1 j.i••4 4,. •� ��.i �s.tF•?:j SttUw} rPtY �lMf a,�j i+,X SJ+ ��'a Scy}}F3'9F.Y. t
• .' fi; f �����kr4���1' c f74t &'tr9'��t'�� ��,�}.+t� � '�{
°. i s). ti�;;r i�;. :•,r•Y;i};ti �ItL'tft:,6L"i. ';c {+( `•� .71'rlti, ,���?�'�s k+��lS�k�}'4'ti u��itr4'° tt�,u{`. �,,
Minutes of the ,dune 28, 1971• Planning Commission Meetin
PC^36 • r $!�yr`�J��."4s�`� er�,�y�.`��'F���j��i���f�j , {•� '
. i
Page 8
t „ r, 1•.. ,�: 1 _. J..l 4� I , I1 i':tl '"{i'.j . ..�. 'ir
Meeting with Mr. Muir said they hand-delivered 6:! Letters to homeownea ^in t
homeowners iinmediate area and had a,Ii4g4ting••„lnf!t. Tuesday even nglfor3the
purpose of showing them essentially the plan.presented`..at
meeting. lie said this;As one;of,,the,;mos,t difficult pieces of"`��z�
Property they have worked with and lie feels that at this,'point r
it is well done. They are less than R2 density and will, maintain
a single-family concept:;• ,This is..somewhat,a._uniquer concepts .or r ' 1
this area.. He showed a,;series;of ,c
developments of similar
developments in•rhoenix '! Y t .L. '• ;'l ,{' . .�.. ''r i a, j.,;f n
'I :! , •'fi J' .t !: liJ. i,t'i�`fJ'4��F/y. C9%L J{,�1 {,� ;:.
aedian strip Commissioner 11irshon asked;:?ahat.,the,,applicant planned,down,the
median strip. Mr. ,Muir,,said;this; is ar30-.;fogt,Jwide;area,,and,',i7t
children could play there. ,•.It'has been.suggested.,by,the, Planning
Department that they put. a walkway dorm, the-,cclltez.
Parking Parking was discussed next. A parking ratio of 2`1/2:1 excluding,,...-
the driveway parking is ;planned. ; .Tl.terejwill•.,be,no sidewalk,.;iti t_
adjacent to the front lawns. ! „r• i {r 1.t,:•, :i.::
Individual The Planning Director. said .this„is ,,a.,tyPic41 duplex_;situation;,but-, ,
ownership the approach is a .little:different :in that';you,
individual homeownership..
Vice-Chairman Buthenuth:asked for comments from the; audince .;;, ,
Favorable Mr. H. Guiseppe,,15070:Deodzra., Cupertino,.,said he;;£elt,,the,)"C.•
opinion applicant has done a very good job on this. lie has worked with c,:1
four different property owners. They have worked with the
Planning Department.. . Ele.'felt, the. City should accept; thisr•,proposali.
Mr. Sam McNeil, . 10571 Cypress,,•,said:he agreed,:thati this would,be,,,,
a good development:here. He said; they have,a.quiet, orderlyiJ. a
neighborhood and he did not- see anything; in.,the .proposal;
would male him think otherwise. . __ r',...- '. . • 's`.i
Mr. 11. Yanus, 15050 Deodara, Cupertino, asked at, what;,point„would,:,,
the exact plan be.brought up for review. by. the Commission,,. Council.,
etc. The Vice-Chairman said if this application is ;approved,. then, . .
the applicant will have to come in for a Use permit. This .-parti
cular plan will become a part of the. zoning.
Private It was brought out that the adjoining apartment complex has ,;;
streets at private streets. The Engineering Department, recommerrled a m,odi-,.,,;
apt complex fied turn-around situation as a condition of approval. The,:.. . ,
applicant is to be responsible for this at Cypress and Deodara. .,. .,
The applicant did not feel this would add to the area. . But,:if „1
the homeo•,•tner.s want it and the City wants it, they will do.it.
f.
i
fi'
�-rr�n ' �,��,�.�',�1v pPvrw .,x� 4R��1x�r�6lx 4�>l 4+`( � lr''ic{'Yt�xN.� � 4a 114 Nr,'"�je�•h�iY. �t �. . a. j�.,Z4
�. f 'Yt. n' ,1 ;'1 S r. 1 :.3Ax� �'t•: ,nl Y` i , R•7 y +f �t.N 3NUS1.c5 ? �,�4`
t { ;6'�f r v cS} •L t. A,
{ •
:t 4 t�.,t c t,t T 4ia ii<�. hZ4rCa t ,5
�
- }' 529# iF tad P' .Y.es i t g}�
Minutes of :,the June I 197l-.Pianninj; jCoiawissioa Me PC 36
{w a 'Page 9
AgbL
The resident ;atYtl0547,t,,Cypress.,said;h Cs ,homer is,rsit,tinG.,r;igrt next, ,No turn-
to this proper,ty,.and,,he feels.,this,:: a .a every proper,.use,->orhEthe"f s aro end,_problams
., •{r Y9 1 q;r 5�1 t
land., He,sees. no turn_,around ;prpblems
Mr. R. Koenitzer, 10060 Phar` Lap Drive, said this look's quite '
suitable as a transition between,•apartme-; ts ;and;�r�inglc;•1 amily; ;; ; ,
residences. Apparently the homeowners •fE'el rthe,;traff,ic.�circula ? , . 1
tion will be all right.
Commissioner Hirshon }was i.nterested,;i.n!.what types of.people.•will'' :Types,,of
be living here and asked if any studies had been made. Mr—Muir., people who
i
said it may be over-40 people whose children have left the-nest,'.;'• will':live here.''
or are almost out of the nest. To Commissioner,•,Hirshon;'.s;rconcern,
about the lack of recreational facilities, Mr. Muir raid it. has ~-
been proven that in these large complexes very,littlause: is;made; ?,,_` ;, ; ;,,; , ;,;,,;
of the recreational facilities. ;,,; } ;;;.,,•; ;,
Moved by Commissioner Puetz, .second6,d, by .Commissioner,,Hirshon i ,.,? -Public
I to close the Public Hearings, Hearings t
closed'
Motion carr,ied,,,3-0
Moved by Commissioner Puetz,, .,seconded,by Commissioner Hirshon to .. 3-V-71 '
recosrnnend approval of applica-tion 3-V-71 to reduce the acreage approved
requirement. of P (Planned Development) from 15 acres to 4..6 acres.
Said property As located .easterly iof, and.adjacent. t:o,Blaney,,.._;
Avenue, approximately 500 feet north .of
AYES: Commissioners Hirshon, Pue,tz
NOES: Vice-Chairman Buthenutdi ,.,- ,_,,•;_;:.
ABSENT: Commissioner Meyers, Chairman,Irwin1
Motion carried, 2-1
Discussion of parking along the street followed.- Commissioner Street
Hirshon said this would detract from the beauty o•f. the-clus.ter parking
development. Vice-Chairman Buthenuth was concerned,about. the & sidewalks
absence of a-sidewalk. There was some mention of monolithic
sidewalks. The applicant said if there is .to be a sidewalk ,it
should be down the center of the park:day, Vice-Chairman Buthenutl
felt the density was too great here. Commissioner Puetz said the
sidewalks and driveways are not yet solved to his .satisfaction.. .
' a
A Member' of the Architectural and Site Approval Committee re- .
quested reopening of the Public Hearing because of the lengthy
discussion of the above matters. This was not done.
Auk
Mi
� r
II 1.
,
t
r:
K.1:. r. F1i T'P, , ',inA 4+ Y 4,,'^' vp• 4: �L'u,}° 5(. { �i ?5 Ym i,,,,Y .
,�;:. ''' ,mow• -?o, .{� u.
4 n�
,.<;vt'E.n,y,�n��y M•1y�{` r_ �v}�, r 4 g W61, �}, i ' t t
.7"•�;;1.'•5...��i•` 1�?i'•.St�� �j.,�4eit t� p� rt "Y},ttt�!o'.,�i-` ,,�y �t�1(�S{,�',}'�'i ��j..1 rtPt�;4 +,:{'r, ,, �sry�,.,, , .. • �f l��•�'"
xe
�if £';
.•i r! ' t'_. r � t ,"S �`. 1,"1<<r• �1 f„i��' �,1'1 tlilLt��'t�.e��5�X1 t�Fa( krti',�1• i
PC-36 ;Minutes of 'the June 28, '1971 P1'aririing Commission Meeting{ � �tiKa ���jij � G=ti"!
Page 10
�
12-Z-71 Moved by Commissioner Net'z''sec'onded"-•by""Coiamiesion`er 111 rstioriJto'4zi
approved recominerd' approval' "of 'a'policatioii r1,2=2=711, "iubJect- `to''Ch'a']k�;��'
w/conditions standard conditions, plus Co'•ndi`Cion's `151''thr66'gn 32'',proposcd;
the Planning Director, 'with amendments. e-
rr
- ''. , •'i t1 i 1.. . :Y1. .�E •i ..I .f F'•.:if ;1, i,,(V . .•. .� f..• V �.,�{" y{t i'f,.��i'�t•'�[ }•?
AYES:* Commissioners„
l'ii irslion;i'Yuetz'
NOES: Vice-Chairman 'Buthenuth
ABSENT: Commissioner Meyers, Chairman Irwin',, j t ”" l,'� • ?
tI , 'Motio'n- 'carried, a2_1
r •'', 'i .. ' i I .:il tz;•i,,:.1. o'd
Amendment to -the above motion;
Condition 33 . Upon recommendation of the City 'Atturney,','it' was mcVe'd'by`"''ri
added Commissioner Puetz, seconded by Commissioner Hirshon"t'o ''' t =':{:�
impose Condition 33. The sidewalks, driveways and parking
shall be discussed at the -time of the Use'Permit'."
AYES: Commissioners Hirshon, Puet.z
NOES: Vice-Chairman''Buthenuth' "I
ABSENT: Commissioner Meyers, Chairman Irwin
Motion carried, !'2'-1,: .. , .. .1 ,,::: '. ,.r; ..::;�<;.•>
MW
The applicant was instructed- this 'wihl`•come 'beford`-tha 'Ci!ty
Council in three weeks.' :!.r••r: .. : ,'.' !'1''. i .• i.t'"'i, s ;,i-,r.. • :�a:+i:>>,ri',
Vice-Chairman Buthenuth called an'intermis''si-on-"�a'tt'i0:oo"'P.M.
Meeting reconvened at 10f13 P.M. '' ''
4. Application 13-Z-71 of Carl N. Swenson Company, Inc. , for
prezoning approximately 43.1 acres from County Al-40
(Single-family Residential-'Agri(_ultural''40;'000 sq.!'ft:"fiot6)`
to P (Planned Development) with intended' use'of a'211=unit- r
single-family residential cluster development. Said `
property is located southerly o1' and adjacent to Stevens" '
Creek Blvd, approxi,;iateiy 1600` feet west of Foothill Blvd. -`
First hearing. '
Development The Planning Director said the design concept is to concentrate `.'
description the housine. unit in the relatively flat easterly porti•in of the
property. The development plan and pi.ofi:les were plac_d on"the
bulletin board. The most westerly units will reach an elevation:'
of 470 feet which is the beginning paint of the steeper topography.
Grading is explained in section B B of the site plan. The overall
difference in elevation from lowest to highest unit will. be about
70 feet.
.. :r�. K,`.4•r ,.�'.�r
t 3�
-,�`� 7� . F Nn, ir'' ,��2�• ti ms`s; :t4 S- c:ro
.- s., ��ya�1i.�. a >.�'. .;�1sr a�'x:sek>w .�,•CVd r M•, ,1.•
r
.,P)-y l,.(4t,:'+'Sla+sn`fty3•�cFffr�>t4(�tq 5.;2 4r1YS �{ ��; ? + t `"
CIAO
- tyr'i
• r 1 ,� ul.t 'tN' i 54.�'N S7�i }7 �.0 3ki.ry tt S��N O
' f,4"! J ,*,} t - ., 7�,"` s•,w F:f� �`a 1 i,7k" � �9.. r ,b' i � t7'
' �r t f.••t +< an ..✓> ��r �f �3,5Y .h��}�Y � } �f!y� 1 ,F i t'ftY.}'`3'�` _
},. ti i t>y J[,I�� �j�•5`9'�,���PPr�E,3Gr '�'� i f r
. •. f r. ?.{ r.}'f>vS b�ftvrf, kGA Y`'` .X. 4 '^}, G .
Minutes of the 1; tinge ' " �6
June.2S, 1971.Plannin Commission Mee ti''� ik Tc 36tr 4M" ,.
� `.i !'✓;`; lit)�:.:b;lr7;i'!::.) arih'`.'tft}::. C.14?.� , \ :t..ul.. Lf - ARJ(:lf(1.,1..Y� �Pag@.141.
_�,l;Y'7s?;8ti„8i� {{'.4x"•'2'7 Gw,4�;:a•' .1, J�L. J
® the'-;`'' k.(r..}E` !+ f�', to aY •�
The density proposed is 4.9 units per acre (based upon ,net Dens ityf'
acres a"of the` ro errt considerati'L' below' the' 7�.8 which`wa® yx� I ,� 1<.�rs"°•' '
8 P P y)', Y
+ reviou'sl• ro osed.'cfor"this'` roper't r "r iBesed
requirement":'of'Ithe'JCluaterr`Oidinnri de', 4 30W.sq. ft'.'r is`,being
provided''per; unit. J'-The' density°`,�ithi:htrthe 'developed',(a'resy'o£_";fhe
property is' about 11 per 'neti acre'.' }-The';set'back fro�n'`Permarieritef, Stzeets';
Road will be 60 feet and •heavily'•scieeried,' tThere''wili'•be- ,2411"5'( ('
private streets built to City speci•fi tatlons., s ''` %tu.i .. a,�c� "t .
i v
Vice-Chairman Buthenuth 'asked"wha't�-hFtppens"when' the City:mayi'have `'•
to take over' maintenance of the Istrects�. The"Planning, Director
said the 'streets` will 'be built 'to;'Cit:y•''standards'}and' wi11'•be (sub!!-,,
standard in 'Width''only. He•'added'"ths.t.•an; 'teneive iceview`of` ttie
'J i•t, fl`•'�f1 : Ii;J ..�r� rrrrE,.� .
homeowners' associat ion 'is' also`invol.ved•.' •
The City Attorney said that in a situation such 'as'`thia' w`e tiave 'a' Homeowners'
homeowners' association for the people who have a vested••interest. Association
They have bylaws and- procedures to'see''to it' thatt'the6eT,ih16gs' are f
taken care of. Vice-Chairman Buthenuth was concerned that we will
Y
end up wi.th�°a'tremendous amountirof!iprivate 1streets':1 '-It'`'ia fine '':' �'' `'•°``r
now, ;b'ut' what happ ens'•ibhien they'star t 'to`need, maintenance. The
City Attorney 'said-the''VA'and�'FHA'impose "elabo'rate -,c'onditi'onsr o
insure the' homeowners'' association'is 'kept''up ''arid I'eff
Mr. A. J. •`Simms, -representi'n'g the Carl N' Swenson Company, 'said ' 'Pilot project ;<
Swenson'is doing this because' it -jis basically- 'appeal ii:gt°:t`o lthem` 1
They have done heavy construction in thi6':'area for'°many'=-years�:�: '
Mr. Clifford Swenson is looking at this project as a typical"
condominium. It is a pilot' project in the,town'house,•'conc'ept 1 '
Mr. Simms `said this site has some severe"probl•ems'=whiicti�=include-`1" Site problems,
tPermanente Road;'with those'big' trucks 'creating;,hois'e and a`."'safe•ty
problem. A 'screen has been"designed 'by'ant•a'cousti'c'al' phys'ic'ilst`r'-J
to minimize the noise. The design includes a series of' walkways, f'
a recreation room and swimming pool: They'•hav'e also:utYlized •th&
existing creek and-made, it into a ful'L'running creeklwith pump;':t,
Etc. The design saves the' knoll'as open space':•r-The`densi'ty`is`11'
no greater than RI , 'and there will' probab'1y be :fewer 'children-Here
than in a typical Rl.
A potential hazard was brought up where Permanente Road would go`' Traffic study
,
from one lane to two lanes and back to one lane of traffic.
Mr. Simms also said he was not sure there should be •a signaV:;at`�
the proposed location and felt there should be further :traffic' '' ' '
study-
_41 Fsn�'1?� `' ��, r��...-,�.•'', •'��lv� "� ti ter,. ?O. t. t �3a.b J
1i
•r
-"•a-ir�4"4,:ti;ef V��r rs 'r'�.+ i , "�• 7 i x t,., a 'Oa �i� s ny t,�.r•�
• @4.,.�°s {�!� 1r y�R�k�-w j' i.%� j , '' i�y�� i,�• �` F s G r �h(y i "i'�"1�^•
, a t�F ttlr `•s§yyr r I�,, . x.�'p+ak. 4� t�a{`�,yt{r�y rti�er��l`�',�,, y� w 95 � t R°,, t a
t. •1: .{. rt, a ;. ;tt'+ K a 6 ° Mr ii 7, t�- ?h \,7� c�
b.d � :.} t! ,it.1 `� Mir,`.:ggr ,t�Al3R l�y•�,�rF' , tv �,,,, 'Zt�J!t¢ h�• w``� s.s`
7RV^k n
G
i f_-"!3
V ,
1rI't•
.. )„ .., s ,. .{r.,r(._:}.,-7, i„ :` {p 7. r,, `f ' 'i?r �_: �{],ui. raj "r„�,� itsnl.l•;� 1tr�i`iylrur��L a .' ,
PC-36 t: Minutes of the June 28, 1971 'Planning Commission Meeting''*,,.
T.
Page 12yhC ✓afro 4�M �.
g r ,YR 4 > a. °b�.a '4ty tti,a5l�{i
!3q a ! {kl k�. :yC i }, )td;j7iq f �T;aril.,^Y�1C ,, t*4t - ci x
Walkway Mr. ,Simms said the!proposed •.Conditio�nr;•33 tells hrm ;that}they',�havP4to'��r,1;���F
provide.,a ,walkway ;to rce.tain st:andar:cls,developed t�y,tbe ,City;�tj2trq��tgh{' yK
the adjoining: tract„ for}rthe childre,n.r;.n•,this„de�elopwent�{rtoreae ► •as
street, and. then walk Ito ;school.t,LHe� ;could be• willing, to{deva7 pa a, ".,, ' al,r`
walkway 4pFoss-,phe drainage„ditch,,if, they .can ;acquire-,the necj3saary-
property The.problem is,.in,.guaranteeing _something;,
this time have the power;
Off-street He also wanLed ,to, discuss..the,,off-s tt,eet!;parkittg;-problem. ,;They fare. •'Y.
parking 45 parking. spaces ,shy„of the„required. ncmber.,.,less ,the.,drive ays.I
which are ;25. to 30,ifeet,;long.; -,..They {.,euld .widen.the';streett,to"f3Q,zfeet:,
and have on-street. parking,, whicli .is .not! desirable.{71 They'}could_use
some of the open space for, these, additional,,parking..,pp aces
every time they stretch out . -another space he felt they would be -'
hurting the development..,.
Vice-Chairman Buthenuth asked,:for, comments from,;,the.,audienge;. •,!;,;j,
Foothill Mr. R.. Koenitzer,• 106,00 .Phar Lap„Dritire,; said:.weahave.at�ove, here,;an y
access area of 1000 acres ..for, 10 to 15 .thousand .future.citizens, with i12,.,
lanes of access. ,,If.,this development is rahnro.vg4.,we have, cut',,offj
the last possibility;for;,another•;East-West road v Before,rwe p.erm:�t
development here we must come up with some idea of our future
traffic load •and ,placement of ,major arterials, Fie asked that, allt
Aft
app li cat ions, ;for,,development An ;the foo,thills.bc delayed; until ;tlse '
access .roads._are.l.aid,-out.. r.•.: z .l. _.,•`.rt.}:+ °'r,1ar
. , .�• •. :r; :;. :;cat:1. •:S e,rrr ., ,.:TC.i.3.i�.1::, '`cf; •
Objection frorr Mr.- Dean ,Sayre, .10805, Stevens Canygn Road ;said;he pis an;,.elected i
MV Homeowners' official of the Monta Vista Homeowners' Association and he feels ”
Assoc. he must object to.this-development;.,. He:
did ;aot Leel.ahis;.,would_be
an asset to the community that.,is p.re.sen.4y there. {,rBy increasing
the density there is no-chance to :improve.,the,community.
Mrs, Jackie Hall, 106.29 Baxter,. s aid-the ;density ,has been,,-lowered
and a huge portion has.]�.een left,open !with this iplan. ,” ,Sherasked.., .
what the dispositior..,of the open space ,,Fould.•b,e. and.,whose;respon, . .
sibility it would be. She,: too, wondered what provision.,w_ould be
made for access to the foothills. She also wondered••whac, conditions,
would be like before and during grading of the actual construction.
She was in favor of the walkway.
Mr. Dave Rickey, 10114 Dol Prado Way, felt the proposed sound berm
should include "a wall. He also felt the parking, issue ,should be
resolved before development, as shculd the pathway to the school..
Mr. Simms said a 6-foot masonry wall on top of the sound mound is
included in the plans.
r.
ti.
i
�n�•,�°a•>s, w�k4,S��.3-.�{ �;1. � ? �a �.�”-5 t �'��1 ,d.�4�� � 5 q� �.�iF.c. "V'r��� �`r 4 �F
�-i.,y�7-rp�xP�,Y�`��t.h•}� u'€�,'�fr�"�.�R�j;��a '` ti�y;� t �a`��-M� 'e�'-a,.+k'k`+A'rus ayt�t.a- '•t�� 'a•a.S�YH ^ iT'�'i:. �a'^ .f'x*"�� c ,
t " -:` `_ ._. S..i..tn�c mss._,cam._.� .,,, �y.3� .a.^ a+!":� bS,, "�"�`r'-a�.•�. .. �r=�1:«”' ...a�” .m ter..
A
• c,'yti"1 ;}{E ,° � :r.-�i u s'��?r' �r �, c'3.Y'1i ✓fU r rs - A, f
. . ... . r . 'o � i.r_ , ris' +•Try r,y �ss'rr 14�g�� r r 1`,1+; .n .s3q �'
', : }. r ,. YN'fw. ;,'1F Hrf�'t,�a� $•k,' ( �a:[�CY•� n ,y�'f Fr;^�4 q'1t� t
Minutes of the June 28, 1971 Plannini; Commisppsion4Meeting
✓l1.0{..S'',lid �1yufk1�11Ff
Pagar
• :, , v '' t,{t1 a 't�'`',j�'kr�t, i�oy� n1� .NcF�� rrtJ, '.r,fh
N t r r i e ,
Commissioner Hirshon was concerned about only one access totir�thtsE" Access"',I f., .
property': ',,The i City:Attorney?:eaid,;Mr iirS mois` h'asl i`ndicatefl:++th ado r problems;;>',
- u: 7 r
• not have:jthe !power:of et41r►ent:!domain 'The easement could'
acquiredfat':the developeL';afexpense. ' yVr]�0,0 i," J� 1l1�t, 1C((li6
Zi t•r i i).'7 LF;:!_i J r rJ <l e(j�(.�, � {
Moved by Commissioner to`close:the !Pubhic!:Hearing: 'r!Motion'•diad,r'r'
for lack of a second.
Commissioner Hirshon was interested in the access- to the Monta !
•' ;Unsolved '
Vista School. Commissioner: d,
Puet'z was::concerherabout,_the .off- ..ci (problems
street••parking':and,•ingress/egr•ess,ito,the..pr.operty.. .i:Additional
concern was shown •regarding;:the one-Lane, two-lane,,:;.one-lane;
situation on .Permanente. Road.
• , . u• ... '(' .,. ... .'1 i` 'r'., . 'i Li'. (;i T,�. .,_ ..X77!?l', S7S- rf%' S1'. , .f(.:. '. .,, t
Moved by:Commissioner Hirshon,-seconded'-.by r.Commiss•ioner,.Puetz,r;to.i Public;
continue this Public Hearing; to:,the .next regular meeting-„ ;to1.a1-lPw Hearing
the applicant tame rto,'further ;study, the-.,p.oints:brought up;-,at_ th.is.j continued '
meeting.
j Motion-,carried, •3-0. , ;;t a:- r`: ;.i.;r
rr:J
UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None .
• .. .r .. •i's .... .:i i .e•!... „�i.{'i 7J_r.... ..:9`.)i., ,S'r,}.,.a:JJ'r_ .i... �
NEW BUSINESS. None;
REPORT OF PLANNING COTIMISSIONERS: None
' :r. � , '} .. _..,.,. .i r7 �fii fiic!$�t; at,(•i• .. vl ,
REPORT OF PLANNING DIRECTOR-
A. Zoning and a Use Permit were granted to Parcel l for the Homestead and
Enco station at Homestead,and.,Ma:ci.ne.,. Lot 2.,was•granted �+ Maxine
commercial .zoning,. .This. zoning ;as:.denied.by the„Planning
Commission and' subsequently 'approved by.,the,City, Council
n 1 n ,',�, ”i'''::
with the condition of approval o!: the"site plan by':the '
Planning Commission. Director Sisk said the applicant
wanted to discuss the possibility of elimination of.,the,,
masonry wall.
Attorney Robert Dempster said a church is goirig to go behind!'this'
property and he felt it did not make much sense to put 'the 'fence u
behind the trees. There is •a 6-foot drop in elevation, making the:
fence height at the service station is feet. Instead of a fence 4
r
they are suggesting a 6-foot hedge all. the way along the property; (
to work in with the trees. Vice-Chairman Buthenur_h agrees. that �
landscaping would be better in this case, and should be reviewed I ;
by the 11-Control Committee.
k � M
`"���'3'7`...t;�,�' �..yr� >Y�,'�`�, r�-.+,,�-•ita,�'3 ti .:��•�.,�za- ?` ” t�kv�'Y�'� T �,�`=u °�' ., - ,
.r s -•ne ra „_�:'i9 4�•�-'3..s ,T �:,•> ,.j i'C �.tkf :.k .• �' t
ti
0
.f
t`,
. �nw ',+, rp+r� >ash,^�'C" r'+�Ft�'Rt�Riet��4`�,,�ti•}er��r� t�4
}.. •x i y w . * � '. F•` �7 br§ar�K fR• 11}tit"•y;tijr,i r�~hJ
ripS!. �1�,ea,S�t„�'•s,. a� 4
. i 1,'. ''
�rT71 rtO U7�J �hp�cd� �1
�r` P
vc-36 �, JMinutes of the June 28,, 1971'.Planni.ng-Commission'Memtitig.s�,�4�;
Page 14 ( i ";rr � •',rt�M1r vi i7t�' C? AKf
WP1 Si 1,.f y_i l-vis .. _.'! i'r: 0,3 4,. .7 Ci''! , c, •J rJ 1!., i '!fj l,i f?.J;IK'IJ�'•I£ t't Yt
:Moved,-,by C.omml:ssi}onerf Uirsbon;;,seconded;,by.,Commiss ion er;,'.P,ueta,r�:t�iat Mix'
hov 'a deetion
Amendment the development,:plan,!prev:louslyl.ap;troved.ib.e amended4tor s
approved I of the requirement of ..the, 6-foot:,m ksonry ,:wallgand furthers` af9ati»
t•
u
factory type of screening -to be installed which meetsM'Ywith
: s
approval -of r,the H-Control Xomruitt'ee:a;f;�? - r,:r -!nr-,o %sd
Motion carried, 3-0
B. The City;:Council: contdnued, the!i-Saich'..matterr)requestint�.morer.,
meaningful .de-,,elopment .plans. r,:orbe::prepared !by, the rapplicant:.
and requesting the applicant t:6 :meet'•wathithe>Planning:�,Department.
Saich Attorney Dempster said they were questioning the location of the
. property buildings and• the amount-of. landscaping. 1 1lie',presented';:three: ,''<"I
renderings, one of which showed: the: �addition of 15Wfeet,io&.1andscaped ,
berm across from DeAnza College',toxscreenrthe=parkingispaces: !Ne
said this would not be much different from Vallco Park anda'other"
high class shopping centers. He suggested reducing the sidewalk
width from 10 to 5 feet:. : ;He'tadded'=that if the City Council -is' willing,'
they will dedicate a section of the property adjoining the..City"Park
back to the City. p
CIS .. .��;-1;�'...'.:� rf:'T':wa-�l'=,���•
Council's Planning Director Sisk said this evening is the first time he has
instructions seen the modified plans and there does not seem to be any significant :
change. The Council's instructions were for th'e'apphican� ':to meet
with the Planning Department , return to the Planning Commission,',on ,, .
July 12th, and to the City Council on July 19th.
C. The Planning Director briefly mentioned the Roundtree develop-
ment at Stelling and McClellan.
• `; „ .:!._ ,+Gti iris .4 ... _
D. LAFCO recommends prezoning 'not. only the L`-shaped' property in
the Monta Vista area to Light, Industrial,' ;hut` also'"that small i
portion within the L. '. +
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Cotnmissicner Puetz, seconded. by Ccmmi,ssioner Hirshon to
adjourn- the meeting. at 12:12 A.M.
APPROVED:
• airman.,;. =trt,r..
ATTEST: ;<'
! ity Clerk