PC 06-17-71 .,�./•-- �,. t� :�t;� it r i 1 E•:.� s.+ 7v r ��.�� ����q � I v 41 ! � � c
• .`� .r',' ,�1`.?:�N t ,'7;w9.ja°4°ixli(7t�t'�ty���3 {�;,� ,�S'ia a �, rr 1,h��1�i*L.•.�� �����' x�k' a >:}�.
' .. v y✓, '}r r.l,�'r( •�t'���N lei` �y��i ��•�K>4 C ti i.
CITY Or CUI'[P.TIA'0, State of California it?P,C
10300, Torre; Avenue,.,Cupertino;,:,California•; :, 'r:,S.''t ..r,1,.! ,r ; v,`, r'�,lq� >r��iurz3rsX `Page l;r
Telephone: 252-4505
MINUTES OF THE,A0.i0URNED; REGULAR;jMEETING.:OF;?THE .PLANNING COMMIS5ION r}
.JUNE 17,. •1971 IN 'rHE•CON FERENCE-•ROOM, CITY.i HALL i
CUPERTI NO,.•CALIFORNIA
I;
The meeting was called to order at.•7:45" p.m. ,by•i Chairman,Irwin.'orr'`i E r;, 1•• i
ROLL CALL
Commissioners present: Buthenuth (6:10 p.ta.) ,: Meyers, Puetz,�.,Irwin
Commissioners absent: CommissionerlHirshon :.
r
Staff present: Planning Director .Sisk
Director; ofn Public;Works:,Yarborough.;_�;9
Assistant City Attorney Terry
Assistant Planner-,Cowan, ';,,,,n i,.;•. 1t7;i,
TIie initial item of discussion was in regard to the proposed "Crossroads Crossroads
Assessment District". Director of Public WorksllYarborough°;described the Assessment
proposed street pattern and existing and future traffic circulation on District
Saratoga-'Sunnyvale Road and. Stevens. Creek;Boulevard..:r;Heiexglained'a,that!': .
the location of the proposed,north-south,collector;,street:!wouldi.:enable.:,t;:P
it to serve both the Gemco and' the Cross:road&-,center;;and:::thea•future;.:,drl:.'.i
commercial and residential developments :Eronting•on.Saratoga=Sunnyvale,•;io
Road.
The ensuring discussion centered around r_raffic,.,control-:measures, ont:,.i.i;';, ::•,.
Stevens Creek Boulevard L•tween Saratoga•-Sunnyvale -Road-;and.i Saich,.Way,::1 i."i
Moved by Commissioner Meyers, seconded by Commissioner -Puetz,,i that,the,,i Street
Commission endorse the proposed street pat tern •,of: the' Cupertino Assess-.!a Pattern
ment District as exhibited by the Director of Public Works. endorsed
AYES: Commissioners Buthenuth, Meyers, Puetz, Irwin-
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Hirshon ;
The second item of discussion was the Service Station Study. Planning,:,i. Service
Director Sisk introducccd three directors of the Cupertino Service Station
Station Dealers Association: Mr. lion Prince, Mr. Gerald Cook, and .
Mr. John Perreir.a, to the Commnissioners. Mr. Sisk explained that ,the . ,=! .
purpose of tonight's meeting was to incorporate :ideas from -local
x '
`31.¢ x5 •.f z 5 .A� .~� ;. G5"�. � 1 SN ' k ,,,l..r, C +'
a
h- �a•. - y y.tx .,�• n��;tr,;,;�1�� t
t 'i,� '.x11't'Ld�''p'�'7.s; ➢!➢ "4 z�->r�'t'' x''I t t� f ,art x. yt'`��� k ' ti t•` f '
4 r :M Fart{s,��:i 1�!>•y. 71+Uy,dtt<t +r�t`+t�' Z k �'. +s�'i §P''Ft s h s;Y�" ,Y{ ( ?�` iH s. }t "'r`i�i '3'.''
zit
#F
• 4 '1 'ur YL SJL, ?x 1 tY i�v� r'�'�7�,r r �W r t� 44y r "� t: �,
`4� 1 p. ➢t .,;� 1y#,�,tl��+tdk t..,�ar•t,'y'Err s�,t,�f"�•i�,,r,x, � t� .:
, x�t r�•�nl�h""• �}�?�` n� {`}fit'
..dtl•!• t �1�.1 �f r.+.a.'., rt.,'':1� 1r�. 4�li y1 �o? 'f ;a
PC•-36 Minutes of the Adjourned- Planning(Commiss'ionc'Meetipg of.%June` 17; 1971i'�r�t ';r
r
dealers into the 'Servicer'S'tationl'Study: "0As`sis"tan'[''Pl/anner Cowan rInformed • '
the Commission-.of. the status,o'f•1th•e:report 'Eo da`te.,' Mr`:�•�'Cowan explained'''•
that since the Commission's•'• a'stldiscussion'''of the. report the City i
Attorney had rendered an opinion of the report's recommendations. At
Ithis time, Assistant City Attorney Terry presented a detailed analysis"`
of his memorandum. Mr. 'Terry emphasized that the memorandum de.^cribed
the legal ramifications of various means of regulating service stations
and did not -of feri policy •recomnendations� withirespectl io➢any,oine-forth -OdT
of regulation.
Concerns Mr. Don Prince presented a list-. of four concerns voiced by the dealers
of dealers with respect- to the study
1. Definition of a service- station -related to' repair
of automobiles.
tm
2. Regulations pertaining` to display-of'"erchandise.
3. Ancillary uses,. for example: `trailers and .truck
rentals, portable car washes, etc.
4. Sign'regulitions.
The Commission discussed-each matter. s eparately%aiid`'genera'l'ly'ticonciirred- .
that repair:work should be allowed' in'service•stations subj'ec't'to 'an-
evaluation of 'each individuul''service ;s-tation s"ite'I through `the'`iise' '
permit procedure,' that, the:sign=ordinancel should'•bet amended`}it'o nclude!'e'>
a specific percentage of allowable merchandising space (an exact 'for-`� �
mula must be worked out) , that ancillary uses such as truck rental
should not be allowed, and that the sign ordinance`:should be .eVa'Ridted"•"'
1 with respect to th.? number of:signs permitted-'and 'sign•area.%1''t ' '
The Commission asked that the suggested modifications 'bei reviewed{'arid
'''I,nl`,.
presented during a later meeting.
Economic Following the Service Station discussion, Planning Director"Sisk t
f Social asked the Commission to consider three survey questions regarding ttie• l
Oppor- Economic and Social Opportunities Inc., program for the' fiscal-year•
tunir.ies 1971-1972. The Commission responded t.o the three questions and
Program directed Mr. Sisk to forward the questionnaire to the appropriate
agency.
Sid�.yard
The last item for discussion involved the City's••sideyard 'setba•ck'�''•''
Setback 1 ordinance. The present ordinance penalizes developers :choosingtto'
Ordinance: 4 configure their lots with narrow depth and wide street frontage.
t
i 1 �! �� ➢ ;4 Y�..,Q, i���aYLVi.�y '.'17,4,'..,
j:
J
.. ��-. t 5.:,.e ry r f4 .,;,t•aJ� r yC y
r '� t 1, k � fi7+ vr"r�^•+.:1_ f S$d>< �:4��.t'f a." f lt^��, •�'at`ya. y-rr t ���o,
1 1 x ,{:• r{ 2;R i, '�. x x Y 1y&, n> r.� '4 �f �r'.
r 7' t•• !, a, S nt S •4r{''� fig{, §w k�evl�
r�J`�r S5/}F� 3,r S �i� {7r .S,IX
'j .. ,7 f a`'.:3 F`'�7pA Sri' �i,�¢�'yt� Jia .�k'•�'S+}q;;'��+ ,'y7° ,r y�
� �. Va;1sx+ fk�lti�� 5r4•�i �£,t>Fr �1 �§'•7 rt,�y�j41��xrRrr��3• icJ
�
iii nuleti of the Adjourned Plannirig Commisui.on hlecting of Junc.xl7,t�1971�� CPC 36
' y•e" r N: to Ct71� i �7�i•'ir�'1''��
The Commission reviewed the matter, agreed that an inadequacy
present, but made no recommendations to alter the ordinance:
Y
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was declared ajourned at 11:20 p.m.
KPPROVED:
Chairman
ATTEST: t
Asti
City erk
y•Xpll ti R
w {CSC{�' i�
�„ _..;'d`a�t!" .dY"k y4i .�t .x� i.w + i..�, �3�� y�c ny�. asT.Y�.'^ "+�y"� h."`..� ._. §L?Y• ?1r _ •�`.l:ea.____ _ ".�` _-__.__x_��______.. __ .. ___.._. _..._ _._�.___.._.__