Loading...
.01 tree replacement on Wildflower Wy CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORRE AVENUE, CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Subject: Tree Replacements on Wildflower Way in front of Wildflower Village Planning Commission Agenda Date: Tuesdav. January 22. 2007 SUBJECT: Staff report on the replacement trees for those removed from Wildflower Way in front of Wildflower Village. BACKGROUND: In connection with its August 28 and September 11, 2007, hearings on the Bunker development at 1357 South De Anza Boulevard, the Planning Commission requested that Public Works report on the replacements for the trees that were removed by Public Works in the curb bulb-out planters adjacent the Bunker development on Wildflower Way. One of the conditions of approval of the Bunker project (U-2003-03) required the preservation and protection of an existing mature evergreen ash tree along Wildflower Way. This was a large ash tree that served as a gateway tree for the neighborhood to the west. However, Public Works staff removed the tree and a similar ash tree across the street because both trees had caused continual damage to the adjacent sidewalk over the last several years, requiring repeated replacement of the sidewalk. Public Works staff was unaware of the condition placed on Mr. Bunker's development, as well as of the gateway designation of tree site at the time the tree removal was performed. The damage caused by the trees and the past cutting back of significant supporting roots of the trees would have necessitated the removal of the trees, in any case. Originally, Public Works had recommended that the evergreen ash trees that were removed not be replaced with ash trees. The reason for this is that evergreen ash trees have extremely invasive and fast-growing root systems that cause considerable ongoing public expense for the repair of the damage they cause to surrounding public roadway and roadside improvements. The roadside planting areas typically available are not sufficient to accommodate the mature evergreen ash root system, which, as in this present case, spreads large surface roots 25 feet or more in every direction. The necessary pruning of these roots to accommodate the adjacent roadway and roadside improvements compromises the long-term stability of the trees. In order to determine the type of replacement trees that could satisfy both the desire to reestablish an acceptable gateway and the need to limit the public expense of continual repair of public improvements and avoid premature loss of replacement tree viability, Public Works asked the City arb ori st to evaluate the situation and make recommendations. A copy of the City arborist's report is attached. /--1 DISCUSSION: The arborist's report confirmed the problems of the evergreen ash as a street tree in the subject location, and recommended three alternate species, including another variety of ash whose root system is less aggressively invasive than that of the evergreen ash, as replacements. All three are recommended as a good balance for achieving a prominent gateway effect while extending the life expectancy of the surrounding hardscape. With the roots of the removed trees properly ground, there will be space to plant 48-inch box specimens of any of the three in the spaces available. Of the three recommended replacement species, autumn purple white ash, red oak, and coast live oak, the autumn purple white ash is the most similar in appearance to the evergreen ash. Public Works intends to replace the trees removed with 48-inch box specimens of the autumn purple white ash, which is similar to the evergreen ash in height and canopy. Prepared by: Glenn Goepfert, Assistant Director of Public Works Enclosure: Arborist Report from Arbor Resources i -.;< 4i...-.-~. ARBOR RESOURCES Pro.fessional Arboriculfural Consulting & Tree Care October 29, 2007 Glenn Goepfert Public Works Department City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 RE: TREE REPLACEMENTS in front of Wildflower Village Condominiullls Wildflower Way near Wildflower Court, Cupertino Dear Mr. Goepfert: You have asked that I evaluate the feasibility of installing two evergreen ash (Fraxinus uhdei) of 48-inch box size to replace two previously existing ones that were recently removed from the above-referenced location. Observations The trees that were removed are situated within the public right-of-way (i.e. street trees) and are located across "'the street frolll another. The remaining stunlp to the north (below left photograph) is located in front of the condominium development and has a diameter of 24 inches. The remaining stump to the south (below right photograph) is located within a planter between the street and sidewalk, and has a diameter of 28 inches. P.o. Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 . Enlail: arborresources@conlcast.net p h on e: 6 5 0 . 6 5 4 . 3 3 5 1 . Fax: 6 5 0 . 2 4 0 . 0 7 7 7 . L ice n sed C on tr a c to r # 7 9 6 7 6 3 1-~3 ~~,>~-"# . ~ ARBOR RESOURCES Pro.fessional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care October 29, 2007 Wildflower Way page 2 of3 Regarding the stump along the south side of street, there are large roots that originate and from the stulnp and protrude along the surface within the street planter, as well as the large planter south of the sidewalk (see photographs below; the white arrows identify the roots). Numerous cuts made to these roots for the purpose of installing a new curb/gutter and sidewalk can also be observed. ',-'" I - - ~_ ~' ~" "I, _ ~ ...... _ _ IT 4'..).< ~ .,.;. ~ ~... ~l P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 . Email: arborresources@conlcast.net Ph 0 n e: 650.654.335 1 . Fax: '650.240.0777 . Lie ens e d C on t r a c to r # 7 9 6763 I--~ . ARBOR RESOURCES Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care October 29,2007 Wildflower Way page 3 of3 Regarding planter size, I find there is sufficient space to successfully install new trees of 48-inch box size. Prior to this being performed, however, the stumps should be ground to a depth of 24 inches below grade for a distance of 24 inches from the stump on all sides (3600), or to near the existing curb, whichever is less. Discussion and Recommendations Evergreen ash trees have an inherent aggressive and invasive root system that damages surrounding hardscape, particularly within street settings. Evidence of this having occurred can be observed by the remnant roots shown in the photographs on the previous page. Pruning or severance of the roots can occur to accommodate installing a new curb/gutter and sidewalk; however, at the close proximity of which cuts occur to the stump, the tree's stability and longevity becomes jeopardized, resulting in an increased risk of uprooting and premature decline. To maXImIze the longevity of the new curb/gutter and sidewalk, I recommend an alternative tree (or ash) with a less aggressive root system is selected to minimize the risk or damage that would occur in the future. To my understanding, the new trees are intended to serve as prominent gateway trees into Wildflower Way neighborhood. In my opinion, the following trees could serve as a good balance for achieving this while extending the life expectancy of surrounding hardscape: red oak (Quercus rubra), coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) and Autumn purple white ash (Fraxinus a. 'Autumn Purple'). Sincerely, tL;>v <t David Babby Registered Consulting Arborist #399 Certified Arborist #WE-4001A P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 . Email: arborresources@comcast.net Phone: 650.654.3351 . Fax: 650.240.0777 . Licensed Contractor #796763 i~5