P&R 07-12-01 APPROVED MINUTES
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
CITY OF CUPERTINO
SPECIAL MEETING
THURSDAY, JULY 12, 2001
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Jelinch called the regular meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission to order
at 7 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Commissioners present:
Commissioners absent:
Jeanne Bradford, Frank Jelinch, Kris Wang
Roger Peng, Edye Stein,
Staff present:
Others:
Therese Ambrosi Smith, Director, Julia Lamy, Recreation
Supervisor, Christine Hanel, Recreation Supervisor, Peggy Ford,
Recreation Coordinator, Beeny Sanders, Staff Assistant, Marie
Preston, Administrative Secretary
Jana Sokale, Environmental Plarmer and David Greenstein,
Chairman of the Stevens Creek Trail Task Force
CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS - None
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
1. The minutes of May 3 and May 24 were unanimously accepted and approved.
COMMUNICATIONS NOT ON THE AGENDA
· ORAL - None
· WRITTEN - None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
2. Stevens Creek Trail Task Force:
Updates - David Greenstein reported that the Task Force continues to work on the
development of the feasibility study, has been taking pubic comment, and has changed
the process of compiling data that involved more neighborhood input. Study Areas A and
B have been completed; Study Areas C and D (Linda Vista Park and Varian Park) have
required more study and neighborhood input. Reports, minutes, agendas, maps are
available on the City's website. A written FAQ will be mailed to the Linda Vista Park
neighborhood with a follow-up meeting on September 19. For the most part, comments
Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of July 12, 2001
Page 2 of 5
have been constructive and supportive. All alignments will be given a more refined
review. In November, the project will be given to the Commission. Jana Sokale
summarized the progress of the feasibility study. She displayed and discussed maps
showing the study areas. She answered questions by the Commission relating to security,
parking, property values, traffic, handicap access, privacy, trail use, pets, sensitive habitat
areas, etc.
Tour - Jana offered the Commission an opportunity of a tour of the Mountain View
portion of the Stevens Creek Trail sometime in the fall. The staff will set this meeting up
with the Commission and Jana Sokale.
Public Comment
Art Robertson, 2 ! 979 Oakdell Place, complained that the Oakdell Ranch Homeowners
Association had not been contacted regarding the trail study. He stated he has concerns
about increased parking as the neighborhood already experiences overflow-parking
problems stemming from the Blue Pheasant Restaurant. He does not want foot traffic
along the creek, along the south side of Stevens Creek Blvd. He is also concerned about
accessing the vertical cliff, privacy, and property values. He asked that the Homeowner's
Association be included in notices.
Jay Tucker, 10364 Creston Drive, stated that he has concerns about the proposal, which
he believes is betrayal of the public trust. He reported that a flood control zone had been
created for the good of the homes, and now that it' s public land, there are plans to put a
parkway in. The area, he stated, is for flood control, not for a parkway; this is an
important point. He stated that the bridge at McClellan acts as a chokepoint for the water;
it back-floods into the golf course and saves the homeowners. Anything that is done
along the creek has the potential of causing drastic damage to homeowners along the
creek.
Joyce Sallan, 22116 Clearcreek Court, stated that her concerns are in the areas of privacy,
safety, security, and encroachment on local habitat on animals, the creek, and forest. She
also stated that the neighbors do not want the trail (Varian Spur).
Theresa Horng, 22085 Clearwood Court, board member of the Oakdell Ranch
Homeowners' Association, believes safety is a concern because the neighborhood will
become more accessible; they currently deal with numerous parked cars and traffic due to
the Blue Pheasant Restaurant business. The neighbors have met with the mayor regarding
the parking, dumping of trash, and open displays of drunkenness issues. There are safety
concerns about the trail coming by the elementary school and hikers getting hit by golf
balls. She forwarded a copy of a petition for the file that states, "Petition to save our
environment and property values of Stevens Creek Monta Vista Cupertino
Neighborhood. And to stop the proposed creek trail from Stevens Creek trail to Varian
Park."
Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of July 12, 2001
Page 3 of 5
Reba Gibbons, 22086 Clearcreek Court, is opposed to the Varian Park trail spur. The
neighborhood already suffers from the Blue Pheasant Restaurant business, transients, and
cars. If the trail is opened up behind their houses, there will be unwanted people traffic,
safety, and privacy issues. She also believes that the habitat will also be affected.
Coastside Trail Case Study - Therese Ambrosi Smith presented photos of the Coastside
Trail, on Highway 1 in the Half Moon Bay area, and detailed how the trail development
parallels similar issues for the Stevens Creek Trail.. This portion of the Coastside Trail
took 11 years to come to fruition. The whole trail is planned to run the length of
California. She stated that a nonmotorized transportation system is a neighborhood
amenity and a community's link to a larger trail system. She reported that the trail raised
a lot of opposition initially, but now the community has fully embraced the trail as an
amenity.
Public Input
Art Robertson, Jay Tucker, Robin Avandastein, Joyce Sallan reiterated their opposition to
the Varian Park spur trail.
MISCELLANEOUS - NO ACTION REQUIRED (taken out of order)
Staff Oral Report - Youth and Teen Events: Christine Hanel introduced Beeny Sanders,
Staff Assistant, and Peggy Ford, Recreation Coordinator, who both work at developing
and assisting in youth and teen programs. Peggy Ford presented a video exhibiting the
various programs, and distributed summer program descriptions and a list of youth and
teen activities throughout the year. The video was well received by the Commission and
they complimented staff with the excellent programming they provide.
NEW BUSINESS (taken out of order)
4. A Play and Save public service announcement was presented with positive comments.
RECESS
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Review of the Memorial Park Special Events Policy - In their review of the proposed
Memorial Park Special Events Policy at their July 2 meeting, the City Council asked the
Commission to readdress two areas in the policy:
· Should there be a limit of 13 special events in a 32-weekperiod?
· What should the process be for reviewing special event requests?
That portion of the City Council's meeting on this topic was replayed.
Julia Lamy reported on an idea of moving some city-run events out of Memorial Park,
i.e. Shakespeare, Cinema at Sundown, Art & Wine, Moon Festival, etc., providing new
Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of July 12, 2001
Page 4 of 5
event opportunities at Memorial Park. Julia Lamy reported on the pros and cons of using
three other venues within the city: De Anza College, City Center amphitheater, new civic
center plaza and town center development. She reported that De Anza College charges a
hefty fee, approximately $4,000, to use their facility. As an alternative, Parks and
Recreation staff thought of approaching the City Council with a grant program for
festivals that would like to be at De Anza College. These festivals could apply to the city
for a grant, whereby we would pay the fees. At this time, the city is spending about
$4,000 in its own resource money to support festivals that are in Memorial Park (staff and
Sherifftime). A possible drawback to some festivals at De Anza College is that they do
not allow any alcoholic beverage service. This would not work for the art and wine
festival, but for festivals like the Moon Festival, it might work.
There was no public comment.
Commissioner comments:
Commissioner Bradford was interested in investigating a possible grant program. She
reported that she had reviewed the two Commission meetings that covered this topic and
believes that the main issue may be the enforcement of parking by event organizers. She
believes we should encourage events to come to the park and only in the event where we
would have to manage overflow would we send them to other venues. She is in favor of
the 3~week gap between large events, would like a limit/guidance to the number of large
events.
Commissioner Jelinch s~ated that there is a concern among the small event holders that
they could not afford to have parking monitors or take care of the parking issues through
expenditure funds. He would rather not refer to outside venues. Referring to other sites
should only be a last resort. Limits are not needed, because limits say that an event could
be turned away. Requests should be dealt with on a case-by-case basis. He is in favor of
grandfathering all the groups who are already using the park, but we would still need to
monitor them.
Commissioner Wang believes in keeping a 2-3 week gap between events throughout the
year, both for the turf, as well as the community. Both the city and the event planners
need to be mindful of the requirements of security and parking requirements. She is in
favor of flexibility in the limit of events and in favor of diversity of events.
Staff comments:
Julia Lamy reported that once an event organizer did not follow the policies that the city
had set forth. After the event, a committee was established with city representatives,
neighborhood representative, and event organizers to review the issues. All worked
together to mitigate for the following year. Ever since then, that event has been stellar.
The parking monitor issue is a problem because the events assign volunteers to monitor
parking, and if the volunteers do not show, there's not much to be done. She believes that
Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of July 12, 2001
Page 5 of 5
within the city staff, these problems can be addressed and reported back to the
Commission on what would be best served for the event next year instead of doing public
hearings.
Therese Ambrosi Smith asked the Commission if they wanted to be involved in the
decision process on who gets selected to have a large event. The Commissioned agreed
that staff was capable of making these decisions.
The following actions were unanimously agreed to:
ACTIONS
a)
b)
Drop the 32-week constraint. Allow large festivals of 4,000 or more in projected
attendance be separated by three weeks, with exceptions at the staff' s discretion,
of each other to allow for appropriate turf maintenance.
The application process for groups be in the hands of the director of Parks and
Recreation and staff. The Commission will review the performance of each event
as on ongoing process.
MISCELLANEOUS - NO ACTION REQUIRED Legislative Update: - None
Community Contacts: Commission Wang reported that there was going to be a
pre-delegation from Brazil to visit with the Kung-Fu Club.
They wanted to meet with officials. The Commissioners
and staff said they would be meet with them, possibly at the
Monta Vista Recreation Center for a reception.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. The next meeting of the Parks and Recreation
Commission is scheduled for Thursday, August
Respectfully submitted
Approved at the August 2, 2001, regular meeting.