Loading...
Reso 6483 TM-2007-03 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cuperfiino,California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6483 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE A .46 ACRE LOT INTO TWO LOTS(ONE FLAG AND ONE CONVENTIONAL) IN A R1-7.5 ZONING DISTRICT,AT 21871 DOLORES AVENUE SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Cominission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map,as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS,the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan. 2) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the General Plan. 3) That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development contemplated under the approved subdivision. 4) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and unavoidable injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 5) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated there with is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6) That the design of the subdivision and its associated improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, eachibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Tentative Subdivision Map is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof;and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. TM-2007-03 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of August 28, 2007, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Resolution No. 6483 TM-2007-03 August 28, 2007 Page 2 SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TM-2007-03 Applicant: Tracy Hsu Location: 21871 Dolores Avenue SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on the plan set presented at the Planning Commission meeting, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. The �lans shall be revised and a�proved by the Community Development Director prior to recordation of final map from the side by side desi�n to a flag lot subdivision desi�n based on the Planning Commission approval. 2. TREE PRESERVATION All existing trees must be retained to the maximum extent possible. The applicant must work with the Director of Community Development to make the final decision on the retention of these trees at the design review stage. Revised landscaping plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Director prior to issuance of building permits. 3. COVENANT The two Cedar (#1 & #2) trees shall be preserved as part of this approval and that one 36 inch box Redwood be planted to replace the removed redwood (#5). Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant is required to record a covenant on the property that ensures the preservation and maintenance of the new replacement trees and any trees that are required to be preserved as part of this approval. 4. VISUAL IMPACT The applicant shall make every effort to work with staff at the R1 Design Review Approval Process to minimize any negative visual or building interface impacts to the adjacent neighbors. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 5. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 6. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 7. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. Resolution No. 6483 TM-2007-03 August 28, 2007 Page 3 8. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire as needed. 9. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 10. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 11. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City as needed. 12. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 13. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: $ 5% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $2,194.00 minimum b. Grading Permit: $6%of Site Improvement Cost or $2,060.00 minimum c. Development Maintenance Deposit: $2,000.00 d. Storm Drainage Fee: $593.40 e. Power Cost: N/A f. Map Checking Fees: $3,348.00 g. Park Fees: $15,750.00 h. Street Tree By Developer Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100%of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor&Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100%of site improvements. Resolution No. 6483 TM-2007-03 August 28, 2007 Page 4 -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes,the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 14. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. 15. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REQUIREMENTS a. Permanent Stormwater Quality BMPs Required In accordance with chapter 9.18,Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection,of the City Code,all development and redevelopment projects shall include permanent BMPs in order to reduce the water quality impacts of stormwater runoff from the entire site for the life of the project. b. Stormwater Management Plan Required The applicant shall submit a Stormwater Management Plan for this project. The permanent storm water quality best management practices (BMPs) included in this plan shall be selected and designed in accordance with chapter 9.18,Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the City Code. c. BMP Agreements The applicant and the City shall enter into a recorded agreement and covenant running with the land for perpetual BMP maintenance by the property owners(s). In addition, the owner(s) and the City shall enter into a recorded easement agreement and covenant running with the land allowing City access at the site for BMP inspection. d. Hydromodification Plan (HMP) Required The applicant must provide a comprehensive plan to control any combination of on- site, off-site and in-stream control measures incorporated into specific redevelopment projects in order to reduce stormwater runoff so as to not increase the erosion potential of the receiving watercourse over the pre-project condition. 16. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The applicant will be required to maintain all items,which are non-standard within the City's right of way. The applicant and the City must enter into a recorded agreement for this aforementioned work. 17. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All Resolution No. 6483 TM-2007-03 August 28, 2007 Page 5 traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 18. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Department in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS � (Section 66474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices ��C�t. �.ac�(s Ralph Qualls,Director of Public rk City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of August 2007, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino,State of California,by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Giefer,Miller,Wong,Kaneda NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none � � ATTEST�,` � APPROVED:- � , ,��„ �' _ \� j � — / / , 1 � ` rf `-� l Y'�✓ L l Steve Piasecki,Director Lis� i er,Chai e on Community Development Department Planning�oinntission