PC Reso 6514 M-2008-01
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6514
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A HILLSIDE EXCEPTION TO ALLOW A 328 SQUARE FOOT SECOND
STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING RESIDENCE IN THE HILLSIDE ZONE ON A
PROMINENT RIDGELINE
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: M-2008-01
Applicant: Jennifer Jodoin
Property Owner: Janet M. DeCarli
Location: 11640 Regnart Canyon Road
SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR EXCEPTION
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application
for a Hillside Exception, as described on Section II of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more
Public Hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support this
application, and has satisfied the following requirements:
1. The proposed development will not be injurious to property or
improvements in the area nor be detrimental to the public health and safety.
2. The proposed development will not create a hazardous condition for
pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
3. The proposed development has legal access to public streets and public
services are available to serve the development.
4. The proposed development requires an exception, which involves the least
modification of, or deviation from, the development regulations prescribed in
this chapter necessary to accomplish a reasonable use of the parcel.
5. All alternative locations for development on the parcel have been considered
and have been found to create greater environmental impacts than the
location of the proposed development.
6. The proposed development does not consist of structures on or near known
geological or environmental hazards that have been determined by expert
testimony to be unsafe or hazardous to structures or persons residing therein.
(See General Plan Policies 2-48.)
Resolution No. 6514 M-2008-01 June 10, 2008
Page 2
7. The proposed development includes grading and drainage plans that will
ensure that erosion and scarring of the hillsides caused by necessary
construction of roads, housing sites, and improvements will be minimized.
(See General Plan Policies 2-53, 2-54 and 2-57.)
8. The proposed development does not consist of structures which would
disrupt the natural silhouette of ridgelines as viewed from established
vantage points on the valley floor unless either:
a. The location of a structure on a ridgeline is necessary to avoid greater
negative environmental impacts; or
b. The structure could not otherwise be physically located on the parcel
and the size of the structure is the minimum that is necessary to allow
for a reasonable use of the parcel. (See General Plan Policies 2-46, 2-47
and 2-49.)
9. The proposed development consists of structures incorporating designs,
colors, materials, and outdoor lighting which blend with the natural hillside
environment and which are designed in such a manner as to reduce the
effective visible mass, including building height, as much as possible without
creating other negative environmental impacts. (See General Plan Policies 2-
46, 2-50, 2-51 and 2-52.)
10. The proposed development is located on the parcel as far as possible from
public open space preserves or parks (if visible therefrom), riparian corridors,
and wildlife habitats unless such location will create other, more negative
environmental impacts. (See General Plan Policies 2-55, 5-14 and 5-28.)
11. The proposed development includes a landscape plan that retains as many
specimen trees as possible, which utilizes drought-tolerant native plants and
ground covers consistent with nearby vegetation, and which minimizes lawn
areas. (See General Plan Policies 2-54, 5-15 and 5-16.)
12. The proposed development confines solid fencing to the areas near a
structure rather than around the entire site. (See General Plan Policy 5-17.)
13. The proposed development is otherwise consistent with the City's General
Plan and with the purposes of this chapter as described in Section 19.40.010.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, application no. M-2008-01 is hereby approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning
Application No. M-2008-01, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission
Meeting of June 10, 2008, and are incorporated by reference herein.
Resolution No. 6514 M-2008-01 June 10, 2008
Page 3
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
�
, 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on the plan set titled: "DeCarli Residence Interior Remodel"
dated received May 30, 2008 and consisting of eighteen pages labeled A-(0-9), E-
1, S-(0-4), SW2, T24, and L-1, except as may be amended by this resolution.
2. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR�
Approval is based upon a 328 second-story square foot addition to the existing
� 6,171 square foot residence, bringing the total maximum allowable floor area
ratio to 6,499 square feet, including the existing residence and attached garage
and not including the unenclosed shed structure.
3. TREE PROTECTION
Existing trees not proposed to be removed shall be protected during grading and
construction with chain-link fencing around the drip-line. The City Arborist will
review and approve the final landscape plan prior to issuance of building
permits. A tree protection bond in the amount of $10,000 shall be submitted to
ensure tree protection. The bond may be released following receipt of a report
from the City Arborist at the end of one year after completion of construction
that the trees have been adequately protected during development and are
expected to survive.
4. TREE REPLACEMENT FOR TOPPED TREES
Any existing trees that have been topped shall be replaced on a 1 to 1 basis with
six (6) 48-inch box California native Incense Cedars planted along the
northeastern and eastern downhill slopes in order to screen the house from the
valley floor. An updated landscaping plan shall be provided to staff for review
and approval to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development
prior to issuance of building permits.
5. LANDSCAPE PLAN
A landscaping plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning
Department prior to issuance of building permits. In addition to the existing
trees to be maintained, the landscaping plan shall also include the planting of
two (2) 48-inch box California native Incense Cedar trees; one on the
northeastern downhill elevation and one on the eastern downhill elevation to
replace the proposed removal of two (2) Monterey Pine trees to accommodate
the addition.
The landscaping shall been installed and verified by staff and the City's Arborist,
prior to issuance of building permits. Once planting has been verified, staff shall
report to the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits, on
Resolution No. 6514 M-2008-01 June 10, 2008
Page 4
whether the landscaping has been satisfactorily installed and whether it is being
adequately maintained.
For any additional trees that are removed due to hazardous conditions or are
considered dead, the applicant shall be required to replace these trees in
accordance with the Protected Trees Ordinance. Species and size of replacement
trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development
Department.
6. PROTECTED TREES
The applicant shall record a covenant and deed restriction running with the land
to inform future property owners of the conditions of approval of the application
with regard to landscaping. The covenant shall also specify that the trees
identified on the approved landscaping plan are protected and may not be
topped, severely pruned or removed without approval in the manner prescribed
in the Protected Trees Ordinance.
7. TREE TRIMMING
The applicant is responsible for proper tree maintenance including pruning. No
more than 25 percent of the functioning leaf and stem area of a protected tree
may be removed in a 12-month period as prescribed by an internationally
certified arborist. In addition, none of the trees identified on the approved
landscaping plan for the property may be topped or severely pruned back.
8. GREEN BUILDING REQUIREMENTS
The applicant shall work with staff to complete the Build It Greeri s Single Family
Remodeling Checklist to determine which elements of the checklist can be
implemented as part of the project. The applicant shall attempt to implement as
many items as possible from the checklist to the satisfaction of the Planning
Department.
9. SANITARY DISTRICT
If there is any intent for annexation into the Cupertino Sanitary District, both the
subject property and a portion of Regnart Canyon Road shall be annexed into the
sanitary district to provide service to the property.
10. GEO-TECHNICAL REPORT
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit an updated geo-
technical report of the proposed addition on the subject property to be reviewed
and approved by the City. The applicant shall be required to implement the
requirements of the updated geo-technical report as determined by the City.
11. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute
Resolution No. 6514 M-2008-01 June 10, 2008
Page 5
written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified
that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees,
dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period
complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
12. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance
with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404
permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or
Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate.
13. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and
post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional
storm water control measures are to be installed.
14. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities
Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of
Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of
underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing
utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of
the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
15. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water
Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP
plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans.
Bonds:
a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site
Improvements
b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement
c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
-The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule
adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified
at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the
event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then
current fee schedule.
Resolution No. 6514 M-2008-01 June 10, 2008
Page 6
16. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP�
REQUIREMENTS
a. Permanent Stormwater Quality BMPs Required
In accordance with chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and
Watershed Protection, of the City Code, all development and redevelopment
projects shall include permanent BMPs in order to reduce the water quality
impacts of stormwater runoff from the entire site for the life of the project.
b. Stormwater Management Plan Required
The applicant shall submit a Stormwater Management Plan for this project.
The permanent storm water quality best management practices (BMPs)
included in this plan shall be selected and designed in accordance with
chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of
the City Code.
c. BMP Agreements
The applicant and the City shall enter into a recorded agreement and
covenant running with the land for perpetual BMP maintenance by the
property owners(s). In addition, the owner(s) and the City shall enter into a
recorded easement agreement and covenant running with the land allowing
City access at the site for BMP inspection.
d. Hydromodification Plan (HMP)Required
The applicant must provide a comprehensive plan to control any combination
of on-site, off-site and in-stream control measures incorporated into specific
redevelopment projects in order to reduce stormwater runoff so as to not
increase the erosion potential of the receiving watercourse over the pre-
project condition.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of June, 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller, Vice Chair Giefer, Rose and
Kaneda "
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Brophy
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none
ATTES :�` APPROVED:
i
� �
� -- � _
" !f�
. �����
Steve Piasecki Ma ller, Chair
Director of Community Development Cupertino Planning Commission