Reso 6339 TM-2005-10
CITY OF CUPERTINO
� 10300 Torre Avenue
i Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6339
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
� APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE A 20,473 NET SQUARE FOOT
PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS OF APPROXIMATELY 7,387 AND 7,390 SQUARE
� FEET AT 10752 S. STELLING ROAD
I
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
� Application No.: TM-2005-10
, Applicant: Dipesh Gupta, dba Shashi, LLC
Location: 10752 S. Stelling Road
' SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application
�
for a Tentative Subdivision Map as described in Section I of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the
i Subdivision and Procedural Ordinances of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning
Coinmission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and
► WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and has satisfied the following requirements:
� a) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino
General Plan.
� b) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent
with the General Plan.
( c) That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development
contemplated under the approved subdivision.
j d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely
to cause substantial environmental damage nor injure fish and wildlife or their
� habitat.
e) That the designs of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated
' therewith are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
� NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
� That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
' submitted in this matter, the application TM-2005-10 for a Tentative Map is hereby
( approved subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on
� page 2 thereof, and
Resolution No.6339 TM-2005-10 November 22, 2005
Page 2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning
Application TM-2005-10, as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of
November 22, 2005, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The approval is based on exhibits titled: "Shashi, LLC, Two lot subdivision,
10752 S. Stelling Road, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 2 sheets, dated October 19,
2005, labeled C1 and C3 dated November 08, 2005, except as may be amended by
the conditions contained in this resolution.
2. DEMOLITION
The applicant is required to demolish existing structures in accordance with City
demolition procedures.
3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS:
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute
written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified
that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section
66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period
complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
4. SOUTH STELLING ROAD ELEVATION
The applicant shall design the elevation of the future house developed on the lot
at the corner of S. Stelling Road and Jollyman Lane in a manner that will keep the
look along Stelling Road consistent with the existing elevations along the street
since many houses front onto it. The elements that may be incorporated include a
front entry porch, a wrap around porch that wraps around the front of the house
to maintain a street front look.
5. COVENANT FOR TREE PROTECTION
The applicant shall prepare and record a covenant that runs with the land, prior
to final map approval, acknowledging the protective status of the two Cedars,
the two redwoods and the Southern Magnolia, notifying future property owners
of the kinds and numbers of trees protected by City Ordinance and the
requirement for a tree removal permit for these trees. The covenant shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
All protected trees on site shall be fenced off during construction, watered on a
regular basis and no trenching shall be done within 6' of the tree trunks.
G: IPlanninglPDREPOR71RES120051TM-2005-10 res.doc
Resolution No.6339 TM-2005-10 November 22, 2005
Page 3
, In the event that any trees need to be relocated or removed due to required
i improvements, a tree removal application may be made to the Director of
Community Development.
6. TREE PROTECTION BOND
The applicant, prior to approval of the final map, shall provide a tree protection
bond in the amount of $30,000 to ensure protection of existing trees on the site.
` The bond shall be returned after recordation of the final map, subject to a letter
�
from the City arborist is indicating that the trees are in good condition.
7. BELOW MARKET RATE HOUSING
� Applicant shall comply with the policies in the City's Below Market Rate
Housing Manual.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS
, DEPARTMENT
� 8. STREET WIDENING
Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance
with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
� 9. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in
� accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
10. STREET TREES
� Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type
approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No.125.
� 11. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Fire, if needed.
i 12. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance
� with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404
permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or
, Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate.
13. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Pre- and post development calculations shall be submitted to the City. Runoff
shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
14. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities
Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of
' Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of
underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing
G: IPlanninglPDREPORTiRES120051TM-2005-10 res.doc
Resolution No.6339 TM-2005-10 November 22, 2005
Page 4
utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of
the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
15. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of
Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking
and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for
undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of
construction permits.
Fees:
a. Checking & Inspection Fees: $ 5% of Off-Site Improvement
Cost or $2,130.00 minimum
b. Grading Permit: $ 6% of On-Site Improvement
Cost or $2,000.00 minimum
, c. Development Maintenance Deposit: $1,000.00
d. Storm Drainage Fee: TBD
e. Power Cost: N/ A
f. Map Checking Fees: $ 3,250.00
g. Park Fees: $15,750.00
h. Street Tree By Developer
Bonds:
a. Faithful Performance Bond:100% of Off & On-site Improvements
b. Labor & Material Bond:100 % of Off & On-site Improvements
c. On-site Grading Bond:100% of site improvements.
d. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee
schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein
may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a
building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at
that time will reflect the then current fee schedule.
16. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment
enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located
underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas.
17. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES
The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances
installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for
water service to the subject development.
18. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water
Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP
. plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion
and or sediment control plan shall be provided.
G: IPlanninglPDREPORTIRES120051TM-2005-10 res.doc
Resolution No.6339 TM-2005-10 November 22, 2005
Page 5
CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF
ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS
(Section 66474.18 California Government Code)
I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV of
this Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices.
�
--- �2.�.�-l-c , c� � u s
Ralph Qualls, Director of Public rks
' City Engineer CA License 22046
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
� Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
� AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Wong, Vice-Chair Miller, Saadati, Chen,
j Giefer
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none
, ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none
ATTEST: APPROVED:
�
i �
�% � ��
� Jz � , c
, Ciddy Wordell Gilbert Wong, Chairpe on
City Planner Cupertino Planning Commission
�
�
i
G: IPlanninglPDREPOR71RES120051TM-2005-10 res.doc