Loading...
PC 04-10-72 ', CITY OF CUP�RTINO, State o� California PC-57 10300 Torre Aveiiu�, Cuperti_no, California Page 1 Telephone: 252-4505 MINUTES OF THE REGliLAP. iiEETII`IG OF TIIE PLANNING CO�ISSION HELD ON APRIL 10, 1972 Iid THE COUNCIL C�iE1:f:�ER, CITY HALL CUPERTIIJO, CALIFORNIA SALUTE TO THE FLAG The meetiag was called to order at 7:30 Pi� by Chairman Meyers with the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Comm. present: Buthenuth, I-iirshon (7:36), 0'Keefe, Puetz(7:34 Chairman Meyers Staff present: Director of Plannin� and Development Sislc Senior Planner Lauri�z �ssistant City Attorney Deputy City Attorne�.� Ki_lian Traffic EngiL eer GriS;o Assistant Planner Co�aan Recordin� Secretary Lois In;aards APPROVAL OF TSINUTES: P4oved by Comm. 0'Keefe, seconded by Comm. Buthenuth to approve the This motion �•�as Minutes of March 27, 1972, superceded :�ateY on the agenda Motion carried, 3-0 POSTPONEME�tTS, etc. Application 4-U-72 of Keith E. Garner: Postpo:iement requested by applicant to meeting of April 24, 1972. The Planning Director stated that the applicant is in tne process of redesign of his project. Moved by Comm. Buthenuth, seconded by Comm. 0'keefe to postpone 4-U-72 postper.ec application 4-U-72 to April 24, 1972. to April 24th Motion carried, 3-0 PC-57 MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1972 PLANNING CO1`L*1ISSION MEETING Page 2 WRITTEN COi�1MUNICATIONS - There �oere none. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - There were none. At this point, Cor.tm. Puetz arriveci at the meeting and had a correction to the Minutes of i�farch 27, 1972. Correction to the second line of the first paragraph after the motion at the top of the page: ". ..requ:irements of the Ordinance have not been filled." He said the applicant was lacking in elevations and various perspective drawings. �1ar. 27th Moved by Com.*n. Puetz, seconded by Cor.un. 0'I�eefe to amend the previously 2�linutes approv- approved minutes of March 27, 1972. - ed as corrected Metion carried, 4-0-1 (Comm. Ilirshon abstained) GENERAL PLAN REVIEW: 7:30 - 8:30 PM The Plannin� Director stated that '�ir. Ron VogelbauM, a San Jose State Woriz./Study Student, ti�ould be included in the discussions of the General Plan at this meeting. The Associate Planner introduced a discussion on the parks program. �-?e noted that there are numerous kinds of parks, but he nas chosen 4 standards for revier�. The exhibits presented assumed more or less present zonin�. L��i�hborhood The first type of park is the Neighborhood Park. This is intended to Park serve basically the needs of smaller ctiildren and sIiould be within walking distance, not across r�ajor thorou�hfares. Community The second type of in the County Study is the Comriunity Park, designed Park to serve mainly teena�ers. These parks should be c•�itnin bicycling distance. Citywide The third type is the City�aide Park. This is desinned for family-t_ype Paxk enjoyr,!ent and use. This is the type of park where you �aould load the family up into the car and driv� to the par�c for an outing. 1ZegionaZ Another type of park is the KegionaJ_ Park, �allich is used fer h:iking, Park horseback riding, swimming, etc. IL not a wilcierness area, there should at least be an uneouched area. There shou?;i b� 2.25 acres of regional parks for every 1000 population. I�IINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1972 PLA.NNING COMMISSIOPd MEETING YC-57 Page 3 The Associate Planner said our present devel.oped and undeveloped Less park City parks represent about 2.1 acres per thausand population. He lands pro- then reviewed the location of the present City park lands and those posed now locations where parks wil]_ be needed. IIe cautioned that it will be than 50 years hard to acqui.re all the park lands needed. Fifty years ago the ago cities proposed much larger park lands than are now proposed. In apartment areas there is a greater need for parks for the children than in sin�;le family areas. Most apartment complexes today are � designed for adult living and do not include children's play areas, although recreation areas are included. The Senior Planner said there is the one sctiool of thought that 2 schools of parks are not needed because people can drive to the mountains or thought seashore for recreation. Another school of thought is that we need parks that are more easily accessible. As to the argument that we cannot afford the parks, it is a reflection on our economy i£ we can't afford parks as they did fifty years ago. Comm. Puetz asked what considerations have been met for locations teen centers of park lands for the various age groups. The Senior Planner said should be ' that frequently it is possible to get neighborhood parlcs adjacent near high to or near elementary schools. It is harder to get property for schools parks near the high schools. Comm. Puetz noted there is vacant property close to some of the high schools. There is a need for teen centers, etc., near the high schools. If we are going to have teen centers they should be near the high schools because most high school students are within bicycle riding distance of the schools. To minimize social problems, he felt the various age groups should be segregated. Comm. Hirshon asked if this County Study would apply to any com- munity or only to areas similar to ours where there is a regional park nearby. The Senior Planner said it is designed with the Regional Park in mind. Mr. Vogelbaum presented a map which he said is intended to inven- �lements to be tory the various elements in this area to be considered in regard considered in to the parks system: the Permanente Quarry operation, the Church parks progran property, Stevens Canyon Park, Santa Clara County Park, Stevens Canyon Reservior, Gerrard Ranch, Monta Vista Park, Blackberry Farm, Horse Ranch, Deep Cliff. He said present thinking is to keep Stevens Canyon £��ad as a scenic road rather than bring it up to freeway or expressway standards. The Senior Planner noted that the 1964 General Plan calls for the Stevens Creek Stevens Creek Park Chain; however some areas have been rezoned Park Chain and developed so the property owners own the land to the middle of the creek. PC-57 MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1972 PLt1NNING COM1`:ISSION MEETING Page 4 Basic guide- Ttlere was a discussio.i on the time frame for- the General Plan Review. lines due The Planning Director said r_har. on June 30th *_here will be a preJ_iminary June 30th report �allich gives ttie basic guidelines. Accessible Chairman Meyers asked how much additional park land would have to be open space can acquirer? to zchieve the nlinimur.l sta:�dard. The Senior Planner said that, be counted in based on 4.25 acres per thousand populatior�.�oe should have about park lands 170 acres, of ��liich we presently have about 46 acres. C?.zairMan �'Ieyers then askecl if open ��ace could be counted as park space. The Senior Plann�r said the open space could be counterl if it is accessible to the general public. Elements to be Corun. Puetz would like to have the staff p,_epare definitions and considered requirements for ne�ghborliood parks. Tlie Senior Planner stated that another input in this Study �aill be tne County's decis�_on on the Montebello Ridge area. Develop^�ei:t policies are veYy iMportant izi determining parks requirements. Another factor to be cor:sidered is th� subject of earthquakes. r� policy regarding th� quarries should be determin�d. If the occasion sl�oul<i cone u� �-aher� t�.ey wculd need an additional�Use Permit, etc., certain condit ceuld be placed on it regarding b•4ffer areas. idhen they cease operations, funds should be provided for restoration oi the area. Combine de���elop The Senior Planner said there are various ��,ays t�:e public can preserve r:ient caith open space. The purchasing of c�evelopr.lent rights is not practical. recreation Combining development �aith recreatiou areas appears to be niore feas�ble. PUBLIC HFARINGS: l. Application 4�-U--72 of Keith E. Garner for Use Perr�.it to construct a 2v0-unit motel and r�staurant, a gas station and a 176-uni� apartr?ent comrlex �.�ith�n a P(Planned Develop�ent) zone. Said property is located ;n the southwest quadrant of th.e intersec_ti_on of Freeway 280 and Suci^.yvale-Saratoga Koad. Fi��st Hear�_n�. !+-U--72 post-- _�oner�ent orant-- .Postpone-�ent to April 24th granted. �a 2. Application S--T�1-72 of Claude T. Lin�lsay ior Tentar_ive ?�4ap r_o divide .4 acre into r_ti��o lots . Said property is located at tiie northern terminus of Portal E�venue. Fir.st 'rie:_irin�. The Planninj Director_ stated tti-i_s .i� a strai.�;titfor���ard r.eq�iest; ho��ever, there is a drainage problem whirli mlrst be worked out pr�_or ro rF�cordation the the map. The prnpose� lots drain awa.y fr_or,l the str�et, to t:h� � MINUTES OF THE APRIL 14, 1972 PLt1PdNING CO��•1ISSION 1`1EE'iING PC--57 Page S "Stei.nberg" property to the north. Ci.ty policy pronibits drainage Drainage from one improved pror=�rLy to a_.ot����r_. install<.t..:�on of a drain�ge proh.l�� ditch along th� rea.r ef suoject prop�.rt�; apgea.rs to �e the best solution. Yar,�e.1s C anci � are un;.er the �am.� e�.an�rs�iip. T':� hotis _ on P�r. ce1_ C� liav� to b�� either moved or renoved. beca.use it si.t_�; on top of the proposF�d lot l.i.ne. A��rforl:�ance bond could be pos�ed to guarantee rer,lovr�_t to exredite ti�e ma.r I�E?COr'Ci8i:1011� if 311 GV�.Ct:1011 pYO�i.LP_i« SllTf�10E'S. Comm. Pu��z �.�as conce��ne� that the trizn�ui.a� pi��.ce oi prot erty Landlociced bet�;�eez the fre�,aa,� an.i tn� subject property will be lancilocked, prop^rty bj The staff_ said ?=he property owner is aware of_ '�his. It is zoned fre���ay Apri.cultur.al. Mr . j �?alter i�lli_T� I�ZJT'�SE'.iltl_I7� 111�.C.Sey 1iCP12S� SFl!'� �1P_ 1S iY'��lri� t0 hel.p the proper��.y o�aner_ o�it of. some proble:is tha.t T cr�a�eci sor_.e years ago . Con�rt. 0`Keefe �aas concerned about the cirainage rroblem. The P.lannir�g Directcr said this is an en�wne�rinc proh�e.r? and wi]_1 all be resolved. Chairman Meyers asked for cornrients from tize auclience. There ���ere none. �1ove� by Comm. ��irshon, secondeci by Co::zni. 0' Keei e to close the Public Hearin ;: Public Hearings. closed riotion carr_ied, 5-0 Tloved by Comm. Fiirshon, seconded by Cot�m. Puetz, to a?prove S--T�I-72 application 5-�Tr1�-72, �•7ith the 14 stan.�ard conditions and tne a� �proved addi.tion of conclitions 15 and 16 as recommended by the st�ff. w/conditions AYES: Comm. Futhenuth, Hirshon, 0'I:eefe, Puetz, Cl.airman TTeyers NOES: None Motion carried, 5-0 Comm. Puetz suggested to the City Cauncil ttiat if tn�t piece of property does iiot become a part of. the Ste�nberg Apartments, that a bond be required to insure that property is maintained. This was not picke�? up by tt�e other Com.missioners. PC-57 MINUTLS OF THE APRIT. 10, 1972 PLANNING CO���iISSION T�1LI:TING Page 6 3. Applications 7-7.--72 and 5-U-72 of �larianist Province of the PaciFic for (1) Rezo?li.ng approxir,lately tilree aczes from R1-10 (Kesi_dential, single-family 10,000 sq. f t. per dw�llin�; uniL) to i;Q (i�;.�asi- Public Building) ; and (2) Use Perrn.;.t to al]_o,v additional co;�;struc- tion of t:�e i;arianist i:onF�. Said property is located at tlie westerly terrn.inus of San Juan Roa.d. Firs� �Iearin;. Narrow roacl The Planning Director r_eferred to the staff report of Apri1 7, 1972, on this matter. Colored slid�s of the are3 were shown. �levations, profiles and a parcel map �aere displayed on the bul�_er_in board. Eie said the staff has been on r_he site several times to try to deterr.iine some kind of publ_ic access. 3er_ause of tlze ter_rai_n, trees, etc., the roadway �_s reduced substantiaJ_ly. The pr�posal is for one full-t ime e�p]_oyee to l �vP on the grounds to take carc� of the patients at i�his 10--unit rest ho�.e. There tJi:1]_ be four additional parking spaces in the pad area. �uilding T4r, F. Hazen MacLaren, of P.uth and Goin; F.n4i^eer_�n� Firm, said it designed to �,*ould Lie very ci�� �1_Clllt to see this develop:aent fr.o,-1 I'oothill �7_vd. cascade do� Tl,e bui_lding �,ai_1"1 be cascad:i�-;�; do��m the hill. For the raost part, the the hill large trees ���ill be incorporar_ed into the develop�=�nt. tie s<�id he na:� had discussio?zs with r_tie F'ire Department people � nd � t nas been established this T-��ill 'oe "D" occu; anry, � req�i��_res the building to be s�� and that there be a fire access road. A�plicant's Fzther Bertrand Clemens, of tl:e Tlariaiiisr_ Provinc�� oL the Pacif.ic, said st.a_.tel:�ent this facLlit� Lhey are pJ_an�1i_n� to bu=�ld is for tt elderi.y -?en T,�ho are no longer. able to ta�:e care o� the�:.selves . There �-aill �e a nurse in �esidence. It is bei.ng cu_t.1t for ten Men, but L�.:�y never e�pect . to house ?aere than six or seven �iere. T::ey have no tuture p1_arls f_or °xpa�zs:ion qf Crl�? r1YC111V°S � P�OVlIlCill�lt�' 01 riiC.' T'G�St �lOrl�. Com�z. Puetz �oanted to insure t:he ;�ccess road could :!andle ei:�er^ency vehicles. :�Ir. �ia.cLaren sai_d thei floor plan incl.udes � our parar�ledical roo�s. The o1<iier roor:�s are quasi. a.:::,��_z:..ator_y -- :LO _. J_4. C}lanc�s are eYtremely sli:n tLat r:hey ��ouLd iiave to ever double up in the roo�n.s. Comm. 0'iCeeFe as'cec? if th�:re .is ariy danger of l.a,idloe_�ing here. The P'_anning Director said Conditi�n 17 s� �a'�s t::� t:iii.s, �1r. �Ia.cLaren sa�id ?_.88 acr_es are i.n tlie C_ii:v o:: Cup-�rtino; the re��_,ai_nder of the ;�roperty is in t:he Co2�7.ity ,jur.i_5�lict_��n. Cn<��_rm�n �leyers a.slced �ahy rhey ar_c nct Fu(:.f:in� i�. a:il in or�e T���?t��t_�_v� it.,.?. 1�Ir. MacLare:.z said annr_,r��tion is ver.y t.i:<<e---co::�u;li.ng arid t:i1�y ,�iarir_ ve��q :nucil to st.a.rt COT1S� Yt;rtl�I1 L'L11S u11R1i1?F?Y'. �l.i� C�TOl11.C� 5�.?i:: :3�)T}Y't�j�i:lca'i:�? t0 A.i111P_:� SQ[11E:t1Il1� lLl trE? �U1:llZ'E,'. . MINUTES OF THE AYRIL 1G, 1972 PLANNIPyG C0�•�`il�iIS�ION MEETING PC-57 Page 7 COl11IIl. }'ilTSilOTl Wa; c3S�;t1Y'E?t� LCLSL t:tl7..S I:1�1ti:eY' C•7117. T'ECii11.Y'° 11 c?�pYOVS�_. Chairman Meyers aske�i for comr,�r�;-�.ts frer.l the audience. Mrs. Marti Larson, 22770 �lereec?es Roac�_, Cupc,r�:ino, said sne Opposed to reali.zeci this ��ou�:: not rna���e i:er. ver}� popul.a.r, bui_ s�le is against pro�osa.l. any zoni.n; for a r. est ho��iE. Iler. �.; this is a�;it.��e--f an�i�_y area . She noted t�t: gr. eat d.if ference in the ta�>�s o` t;he f ive sin�le- far::ily horaes on �Iercecses Ro�d to tnose of t��e prop��`t_y in question.. R-1 area. �1r. Dean Terrantova, 22_776 i�1er_cedes R�>a�, sai.d �:e feeJ_s the Roa�s coul� �� property is no��r be�nc, useci to =its capa.c_�tj�. Ii� note�� the re��T �inancial facility coul.d acco�ra.ioc�aLe 17 people. :i� a.1sr� felt tr�at visually, burc:en to the s�ructure wi11 tiot be in keepint •,aith t:�e ar�a. Lastly, to nei�hbors pr_ovide roads ior F�-:,^r�ency--t.�; F�e veh�_c �es u�; ti.ere co�_�1�: pose a financia]_ bur_den on ti:�o�e peop�ie 1iviL1�; on ro;.�n t't�e Y��d. :ir. D. t�' La.rson, 2?_770 i�Iercedes Rca�', sa.i��. Corcova is a very mi.niTM:u:t rea;i?�ay, a_s is ?�Iercecies. �oth s�reets are ^nr�_rely inadequa±-e for e:�.�nloyee and/or vi�itor tratfic. An�! �-he building might not be ��isible t_rora Faothill �lvc. , but it taoul d �e f: or1 rlercedes Road. �1r. :�acLaren sai.d it ��ras not thei_r. intentio�z to rez�?ne tile nrupe Use �aill be bur. ratiier it was the require,�ent of the Ci.±:S. T'tle �asi� use oi � residential ir. this property is residential ir charac�er, alti�ough it is beinG k character t:sed by CLlurch p�rsonnel. Traif_ic t�;_ps per c�ay woulr� pro�ably be less than tl.ose of aTl avera�e f_a�;_ly �1it':: chi7_dre�.1. T:i�^re wili. b�� no delivery truci:s, etc. Father Cler.lens sa.id they have 17 rooris, 8 of which are occupied. Intende<: use The staff lives there year--around. They have ;.len �.r',io travel for of property long periods of tirne. They ha��e �.�or_ks.'�ops }iere, It i.s true that fr_om ti�e to time they taould temporaril_y nouse e�tra people. There follo:aed a consicierable discussion of the develop�ent of the road��7ay. .yecatise of. the t:errain, it was uetermin�d that the road shoul.d go on the nortn sicie of the creel;. The structure �oill be at least 18 feet from ttie road��ay. It was noted there are presently ten lots hc�re under RJ_-10 �ohich No hi;n rise could be built upon at the pres�nt ti.me. It ivas noted that the hotet goi.ng 13uilding Code preclucies any idea tha.t tliis is going to be a high i;ere rise hote]_, as has bee.l rumored, e p��-�7 ^1INUTES 0� TI�E APRIL 7_0, 1972 PLANNING C01`�IISSION TI1srTING Page 8 Citizet� cited r4r. Gene Ravi_zza sai_rl he was present on beha:Lf ef another application ?�Sarianists` oii the zge:ida but he Taantecl to spea'.c up. ,.ir� said t?:e �farianists are contrzbution very humble people a.�zd iiave not r��,ztianed tlleir contr.ibu�.ion to society to society via the ec1_ucar�on of c.iildren at i�Iit�ty iiigh School, �ah?_ch relieves the strain on tne p��blic schools. iie asked that se-�te consideration l:�e given to thPse people who de<��ca�_e their liv�>> to se.rvi_ce. �'Irs. Larson sai.d she :la.s wallc�d :1ad.era fror� �Ierced�s to the top and there are roads much steeper than that. She said. this area is r.ot somethin� that ca?,_�� � be develop�d beauti_�u11�.�. Tr�e Plannin� Director stated that som� �eo�_ogical d�ata �azli be sub�-�itteci =�t Tentative Map r_i.m�. nrl�lic Heari_ng i��ovc_d by Com?�. Puetz, seconded �y Co�7m. Lu?:h�nuth �=o close tne Pub]_ic closed Hearings. �lotion car.ried, 5•-0 Li:,,i.t�e;I ��ccess Co;;i�. Puetz i:ote:i t':�at t:�is is a unicue sic�iation and. ti��i? 1 not ai=Lect �1_ dictat� t:ze peopli� in the area; a_t :^.ay ��iihance it. Tu� to t`:.e con�:; i_ion oL the l i-:ited occupa.ntr; 5 they won` t_ creat.e a«y trai�=:; c,�ro�,le:�s . �i� ::ou1d L�ke to C_i:V21O��P,l�'Tlt SG`2 t:i1E' 1�Ul.1CjiT1Q �3L .LE�B.St �3� ;FC�C��: �Y'O?!1 `�le YOc'1C�G7���/� i:10- �iE W�3S COIICP_Y11f-?�� �nT�1<3t: T.-'O'._ll_C� fl3J�);'il 1i 3 6� iE.'('_�. S!-Y'_'E'_� iS YP��iiliAi: t1eY'E'. 11tF'r �-0 S��Y'V1CP_ t�l'� a.YE?�1 ��t?'y'Oi t=_7l_`_� �iOr°'L'�:y. I1 C;%45 �(�1:i�:E.'J. OLi� �'I�c1i: T_�_�i1t' P(�.�? �ti�'_ :IE.'C1S.LOI1 1.S b£'�_i�� Ti1�1.it? t0 ��E'_F'.P t�?1S 3Y'C'8. iilY"S!_. Lli�l'. r�:� %iCCP_jS CJ:l�_ C�:�C'L'r3tt? llr?J_ ijeVE'_�_O��ti;�I1L li1 t:�Cl� �3Y��3.. �l'�.E'_ �L'dLl!1iI1;:; I:l.f'?CtOJ' sa��_d any major road cc�;il1 cor�ie �;.rou�;'t1 thc> C,Lurc't: prep��rty or throu�ii Per-:�anenLe. ?�-`1.--72 �loved by Ce?�m. Puetz, seconded by Comm. rut�;.euuti� +.:o al�prove a;��:l.ica.tion an�rvv�d 7--Z•-72. AY�S: Coma. Euthentii_h, I�_irsl�on, C'i�.ee�e, Puetz, Cn-�ir�an rleyers NOES : No�ze Motion ca.rriel, 5-0 S--i?---72 �loved by Co�iun. PLe�z, ,econdecl i�y Co;�:.l. O ro arapr_ove aYnl.�cat.ion ?-�n�'oved S-U--7?_ s.,itli th�� 1_/ s�.-�;ndard ccnd:i,..Con,, Co:;�.�.'�ions 15 and 16 a:; nr�ted :�/conu_i_tions in the st�if f r_ epo� oi Apr_ � 1 7, :.977_, a���: Condit i.��n 1_7 !:r_or.l tl� e sarie staff r_^port and a..��_�n�'e1 at ti�.i<� r,ieetin�;, -and Cor.1�_��_��ns 1.8 an<. �.9. �Y�S. �Q?:LT?l. �i�?ti)c �{1_t�.,'.lOi:l ��I�E't?.L�'_ Pl.i�_'.tZ� C;1;3..._Y;1FiT,1 T'�F'_�F�I'S iJOES : No �ie Mot_ion car.ri�.�l, 5--0 ,� riINUTES OF TIIE APRIL 10, ]_912 PLANNING COP�R�IISSION MEETING PC-57 ` Page 9 Chairnan tleyers called a recess at 9:58 PM. The meeting reconvene at 10:08 P2•i. 4. Application S-Z--72 of Eugene A. Ravizza for rezon:_ng .22 acre from R3-2. 2(Resicientia:L, �1u1_tip? e, 2, 200 sq , f t, per d���eJ_lin unit) to CG (General Cor.�:^��rcial.) . Said pre�er �y is loca*:ed approxir�ately 95 feet �aes+� of Saratoga-Sunn;n�ale Roaci, adjacent t� and northerly of Kirwin L�ne. First NearinG. The Planning Director introduced the staff report and e�hibi*s. Parking aeeried Colored slides were sho��n of the office builci�ngs where the addi- for alditioL: tion is planned which, in turn, :��ill re�uire additional parking to office bld�. nokT oeing glanned on :�ir�ain Lane. The sta*f �•�as concerned, in the event this lot is not used for the intended parkin�, that the Planning Corimission snould go on record that this �aas passed because it is directly related to the addition to the office building. Mr. Ed Myers, 1.0601 South Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road, Cupertino, said Applicant's he represente� the applicant. �.e called attentioa to the fact tha statenents the previously approved application mentioned that tr�is expansion would be considered at some future ti.:�e. i?e said Mr. Ravizza should be complemented or zis landscapino, w'_zich he believecl is better than r.ost in t:iat area. ?�e said he has r�ad the statf ine:�o and has no objection to the P�inute Order. Moved by Comm. 0'�:eefe, seconded by Cor,un. Hirshon to close the Pubi ic ��earin� Public Hearirg. closed Motion carried, 5-0 Co::im. Puetz conmented that there is too Mucn com zoning in Too much the City of Cupertino no�a, many of wizich renain undeveloped. Com-Ttercial Until �ae have established criteria as to �anere co:�mercial zonino zoning noca . will occur and how it will enhance Cupertino, he is against this rezoning. Comm. �Iirshon noted that this is just to provide additional parkin so there can be office buildin� expansion. Chairman *ieyers agreed in essence �eith Comm. Puetz; nowever, this lot backs up against commercial Froperty. s MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1972 PLANNING COr�IISSION riEETING PC-57 Page 10 Moved by Corim. Hirshon, seconded by Comm. 0'Keefe to anprove 5-Z-72 application 5-Z-72. approved AYES: Comm. Buthenuth, Hirshon, 0'Keefe, Chairman Meyers NOES: Comm. Puetz Motion carried, 4-1 MINUTE ORDER: Moved by Comm. 0'I�eefe, seconded by Comm. Puetz, trLat the Cupertin Minute Order Planning Commission is informing the owner of Assessor's Parcel No. 360-15-53 that the recor.unendation for a c'.�.a.zge of zone for sai property fror.i R3-2.2 to CG is predicated on the property being used as an off-street parking area to allo�a the expansion of the Cupertino Commercial Center within one year from this date. If the property is projected for some use other than that proposed by the applicant, a public hearing to rezone the property back to a residential use shall be initiated by this body. AYES: Comm. Buthenuth, Hirshon, 0'Keefe, Puetz, Chairr.ian Meyers NOES: None Motion carried, 5-0 � 5. Application 6-Z-72 of Angelo Cuva for grezoning .22 acre frem Santa Clara County C.N. to City of Cupertino R3-2.2 (Residential, �Iultiple, 2,200 sq. ft. per d�-�elling unit) . • Said property is located at t�ie southeast corner of the intersection of Lo,lita Avenue and Pasadena Avenue. First Hearing. The Assistant Planner intreduced the applicant's proposa� for a A mixture of � three-unit apartment house. Colored slides of the area were zoning and shown. The property to the east is zoned and dev�loped industri- uses in the ally. The property to the south is zoned comriPrcial and is oc- area cupied by a residential structure. T��e property to the west is zoned com7nercial and is occuried by a �ingle-fariily residence with a home occupation. The property to the north is zoned commercial and developed as residential. Mr. Angelo Cuva, 18890 Tu;gle Avenue, Cupert�no, said he had a permit through the County in 1964 but he did not follow tilrough with 'it. ,, MINUTES OF TIIE APRIL 10, 1972 PLANNING C0;IMISSION r1EETING PC-57 PaQe 11 Comm. Flirshon was concerned that if this property is zoned R3, LI more perhaps the adjacent area will come and request R3 zoning al.so, appropriate He thought he mi�ht rather see this zoned lig:�t industrial than tha.n R3 R3. Chairman Meyers asked for comments fror.i the audience. Mr. �Iarti Hall, realtor, said a nearby parcel sold. for $85,000 recently, so there is a need for R3 here. Mr. R. D. Koenitzer, 10060 Phar Lap Drive, Cupertino, com�ented Density too that we are not goin� to iT*:prove tnis �lonta Vista_ area by putti:�p hiGh in 20 people per acre. At most, he thoug:�t t�TO units should go on this property. Moved by Comm. Puetz, seconded by Comm. Buthenuth to clese tne PllD11C Hearin� Public Hearing. closed Motion carried, S-0 Moved by Comm. Puetz, seconded by Co��-n. Buthenuth to approvn 6-Z-72 application 6-Z-72. approved AYES: Cor.lm. �uthenuth, 0'f:eefe, Puetz, Chairman r:eyers PvOES: Co,�un. iIirshon t�Iotion carried, 4--1 6. Application 4-Z-72 aiid 6-TM--72 of James G. Boghosian for (1) Rezoning 2.19 acres from R1-10 (Resident�al, Single- family, 10,000 sq. ft. per d�aelling unit) to R2-4.25 (Residential, Duple:�, 4,250 sq. ft. per dwelling unit); (2) Tentative Map to s•:bdivide 2.19 acres into nine lots, each lot to have 8,500 sq. ft, plus. Said propert}� is located approximately 400 fee*: �aest of Beardon :�rive and northerly of and aajacent to Ai�;es Drive. First Hearing. The Planning Director noted the staff report and eYhibits explain- Use caould ing the proposal had been sent out. The applicant`s progosal is conform to in cor.formance with the intent of the land use element of the G�neral Plan General Plan. � 0 PC-57 PIINUTES OF TIiE APRIL 10, 1972 PLAr:NING CO''L^IISSION MEETING Ya�e 14 UtirINISHED F�USINESS: 7. Discu�sion of ninor chan€e re: location of storage building - Glenoaks - Aver�� Construction Cot:�pany. Gienoal:s The develop:�ent plan was p.laced on r_11e board and tre Plannin� Director c::an�e reviewed the tratfic g�ttern in t�1�_s cemple};, i:e said a 15� :�inir�um co:�sidered setback �,�as establisned on the we�terl;� side of the preaerty an�' 20' 7inor tro:� ad�acent resiaential areas for r_he main Luil?in�s. The reSuest is to relocate the storage buiidii� and repJ.�ce it witli carports. Aft.er considerable discu�sion it ::as t�ie aenera�. consens:�s or i.he Plannin� Co��,:ission t"t:at ti:is was a^.inor, not a raior cnange, and th� staff could handle it. .��4,? BUSINESS - None P����ORT OF PLANNI�:� CO'�:iISSION - �Ione REPQRT OF PLAN\'IP•;G �iRECTOK - P�one ADJOL'Ri:^1i,NT ,- ,? . Ecl b CCP:i'1, i�ll �d:'?;1'.i '.1 � S P_CO'1G�'�. D COi';TM' . ('i �:<<'E� e t0 a�� curn LO .. � o��r.�eu �o y t' y .._�r�l i9tn Apr�_1 19, ' 972, a� 7:3� P:1. T:ie .::^et_n� adjo:�rTieci :,.t 1_2:?_4 A�t. ifot ;c�i carrieca, 5-0 ' Ai PRGVLD: . /s/ �obert j �1. �ievers Chairman �TT�,ST : /s/ t�'m. L. P.yder City CLerk