PC Reso 503 80, o00 . 6
File No. 3-V-68
RESOLUTION N0 503
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING THE A PPROVA L OF A VARIANCE to allow
a commercial building to be built on a property
line separating a commercial anci a residential zone.
A PPLICANT: Ernest M. Bobs�n
ADDRESS: �16 Marie Court, Manteca, California
SUBMITTED: March 11, Zg68
LOCATION: East side of° Orange Avenue between Stevens Creek
Boulevard and Granada Avenue.
ZONE: Rl-6a (County) A REA: 6 ,75o sq.ft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONDITIONS:
l. This variance only applies to the subject property
providing it remains commercially zoned and is developed
as commercial; if it is not, this variance shall not
apply and is subject t� cancellation.
2. This variance is subject to completion of annexation
proceedings to the City of Cupertino, and will take
effect on the date �f ratificati�n of such annexation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of April, 1968 at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino,
State of California, by the following roll call votes
AYES: Commissioners Bryson, Frolich, Hirshon, Horgan and Buthenuth
NAYS : None
A PPROVED:
��"Z _-' _
ohn Buthenuth
Chairman, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
C �a � Ck;!✓�h
M
Adde Laurin
Director of Planning
- 2 -
C i�' Y C F � U P E R�� � N 0
City Ha��� 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, ��a.lifornia 9501�
� Telephone � ��-08) 25�-
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNTNG �CMM�SSION �F 'I'HE CI'I'Y OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDTNG THE GRAN'TIii�TTG CF' A VuRTAN:;E
WHEREAS the Plann:ing ��m.missi�n of the City of Cupertino received
an application for a VARTAN��E, ati stateci or� Pa.ge 2; and
WHEREAS the applicant ��a� m.et tre 'ourden of proof required to
support his said appl:ication; a.nd.
WHEREAS the a.pplicatior� shows o
l. That there are special conditions �r exceptional characteristics
in the na�ure of" the property to be affected, or tha.t its loca-
tion or itt su�roun�ings a.re s�uc:h as wi11 permit the Commission
to make a determination that a literal enforcement of the
Ordinance would resul� in practical difficulties or unnecessary
hardships; arad
2� �I'hat the g:ranting of the a,pplication is necessary for the
preservation an� enj�yment of subsr.;antial property rights; and
3, That the hearings sh�w that trie granting of the application
will not materi�.11.y affect ad.ve.rsely the health or safety
of persons resi�.ing or working :in the neighborhood of the
property which is the subject of the a.pplication, and that
the use of sa.id property in the ma.n.rer in which it is pro-
posed to be used �aill not be materiaLly detrimental to the
pu'plic vaelfa.re cr injurious to the value of property or
improvements located in sa:id surroundings;
NOW, THEREFORE a BE TT RESCT VEL o
That af"ter careful considerat:ion of map�, fact�, exhibits and.
other evidence submitted ir. this matter, the application for
the VA RIANCE be, and the came i�, here"y recommended for approval
to the City Council of tne Cir�y o�" Cupert:ino for appropriate
action, subject to the conditions stated on Page 2; and
BE TT FURTHER RESOZ�VE�,
That the aforementioned fin�zngs are approved and adopted, and
that the Secreta ry be, �.nd is hereby, directed to notify the
parties affected by this decision.,
(Ccnt:inued on Page 2)
- 1 -