PC 01-22-92 �� ,��-� �� � ���=
CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ��/
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA. 95014
(408} 252-4505
MINU'PES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMl�IISSION
HELD ON JANUARY 22, 1992
I ROLL CALL:
I .
Commissioners Present: Chairman Mackenzie
Vice Chairman Fazekas
Commissioner Mann
Commissioner Mahoney
Commissioner Austin
Staff Present: Robert Cowan, Director of
' Community Development
Ciddy Wordell, City Planner
Bert Viskovich, Director of
' Public Works
Cheryl Kershner, Deputy City Attorney
�
� ORAL COMMIJNICATIONS:
- None
( Planning Comrnission Study Session on General Plan Land Use
( Chr. Mackenzie noted he had talked to the City Attorney and the
Diocese with regards to having a conflict of interest when
discussing the Seminary property, as his children attend a Catholic
school.
Deputy City Attorney Kershner stated there is no conflict of
interest and a written legal opinion will be submitted by the City
Attorney's office to the City Council.
Staff�Presentation: Planning Director Cowan presented the staff
report. He noted the issues to be discussed will not be voted on
at this time, but to talk in more detail of the general concept of
! issues and then present the ideas to the City Council. He stated
� the Commission needs to look at the major changes in the general
plan as it reiates to the inter-reiationship between land use,
transportation.and housing. He stated once the basic themes are
established then the open space issue will be looked at. He stated
if changes are to be made to the General Plan then housing and
traffic need to be addressed.
Com. Austin stated she is unhappy with the process. She feels the
conunission have not addressed the issue of more or less growth.
Com. Mahoney stated what the issues are at this time is where the
City can grow and where it cannot. He noted the core elements are
land use, housing and transportation.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of January 22, 1992
Page 2
Com. Fazekas stated there is the ratio between parks and housing.
He stated there should be a certain square footage of park for
housing and this will in turn determine the housing. He noted an
issue is the height of buildings.
Mr. Cowan explained how the 4900 trips where determined. �
Mr. Cowan continued with the staff report. He noted the City
agreed not to expand into the hillside areas beyond the urban
service boundaries. He stated there is more potential growth in
these areas if the City is prepared to go before LAFCO, but the
Planning Commission a year ago decided not to do this. He pointed
out all the vacant land on a site plan map.
Chr. Mackenzie noted once the general Plan is adopted, then the �
hillside ordinance will be reviewed.
I
Mr. Cowan showed a model of the land vacant in the City based on
the existing General Plan. He explained the optional scenarios.
Com. Mahoney stated they need to discuss reallocating what is �
already in the ground. Some are potential areas for housing. Mr.
Cowan stated the City does not have the power to change the land i
use. Com. Mahoney stated if the major companies want to expand,
older buildings could possibly be converted into residential.
I
Mr. Viskovich stated if the land use is changed it may not be
additional square feet.
M�. Cowan presented a chart, as outlined in the staff report,
showing staff's version of the remaining growth .
With regards to commercial, Mr. Cowan showed a map of the
commercial area in the city and pointed out the areas which are
built out and almost built out. The Commissioners discussed the
issue of reallocation for retail growth and compared this with the
Sedway Report as outlined in the staff report. Mr. Cowan pointed
out areas of potential growth within the City. Vallco was o;�e area
of potential growth. I
Com. Mahoney stated it was his understandinq that they would want
additional retail at the Heart of the City.
Com. Mann stated with regards to the reallocation of 300,000 s.f.
as outlined in the staff report, if it was economically feasible to
tear down some older buildings and give a bonus of retail if
developers would put housing on top.
Mr. Cowan went on to discuss the trip generations and referred to
the tier approaches as outlined in the staff report.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Reqular Meeting of January 22, 1992
Page 3
,
Mr. Viskovich stated they will try each of the tier approaches
! before implementing.
I Com. Austin read her letter addressed to the Planning Commission
and City Council dated January 22, 1992. .
Com. Mann suggested that the agenda be structured to discuss items
and issues which have not been covered so far in the General Plan
process.
Com. Mahoney feels the commissioners have agreed on certain items.
City Planner Wordell noted a checklist has been added to the staff
� report for each commissioner to put there own choice on and submit
back to staff and they will consolidate all of the choices.
Chr. Mackenzie stated they can be qeneral when discussing the
General Plan and adopt it. Once adopted the Commissioners can then
go back and go over the ordinances more thoroughly.
Com. Austin stated she is concerned about setting precedence by
being too general.
Chr. Mackenzie stated everything is interrelated and has an impact
on each other.
In response to Com. Mahoney's question regarding the additional
growth for the major companies, Mr. Cowan pointed out on the site
plan map the major companies and there expansion requirements.
In response to Com. Austin's question, Mr. Viskovich stated that if
the major companies introduce TDM prograrns and reduce trips, they
can have more square feet.
Mr. Viskovich stated the Commissioners should deal with the General
Plan and deal with the tier approach at the appropriate time. He
stated the reason for tier 1 and tier 2 was to give the Commission
a tool to allow the major companies to expand. He stated the tool �
is not to be used to design the other parts of the City. He stated
the pool of trips should be used as a base and then decide what
they want to do with them. He stated it will be the companies
responsibility to prove that the TDM programs can be implemented
and work.
Com. Fazekas stated the Commission should look at these issues from
a height and mass standpoint. He feels this is more important than
traf f ic . I f the traf f ic gets out of hand , then they need to put
constraints on the Companies.
At this time Chr. Mackenzie presented his proposal for trip
� allocations. A copy of which was included in the staff report.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of January 22, 1992
Page 4
�,
The Commissioners discussed the proposed policies as presented by
Chr. Mackenzie.
Regarding item (b), on the Office/Industrial, Corn. Mann stated �
small offices are needed. Chr. Mackenzie stated he feels there are
enough srnail offices and the big companies are important.
Com. Fazekas stated the small offices are needed and are used.
Regarding item (c) Retail., Chr. Mackenzie stated if Vallco can get
2 department stores or other major store elsewhere, then look at
the General Plan when that tirne comes.
Com. Fazekas stated he would be in support of retail on the edge of �
the City to encourage sales frorn outside of the community.
Com. Mann stated if retail is all focused in one area then people
are forced to get in their cars and drive. She spoke in support of
small retail in neighborhoods.
Chr. Mackenzie stated he has no objection to small retail stores in
neighborhoods.
Com. Fazekas stated there is no retail in the City which is in bad
shape or run down and there is no reason to discourage it.
Chr. Mackenzie stated he feels that a hotel is important.
Com. Mahoney presented his view. He stated that he would agree
with staff as to the retail reallocation square footage which is
302,000 s.f. He stated local access retail should be kept in
neighborhoods. He would propose 1.7 million for office/industrial.
He proposed 300,000 s.f. for the hotel and the 2000 for housing.
Each Commissioner agreed with Chr. Mackenzie's policies for retail,
housing and hotel.
The Comrnissioners concluded the following: "
staff Don Orrin Betty Donna Darryl
RETAIL 300K 0 300K 300K 200K 500K
OFFICE 1405K 1823K 1.7K 1.2M 1865K 1.1M
HOTEL 300° 500 300 500 0 500
HOUSING 2008 2000 2000 2500 900 2000
TRAFFIC
VS GP 0 0 +510 0 -490 0
It was a consensus of the Commission not to create congestion
beyond what is in the General Plan.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of January 22, 1992
Page 5
With regards to retail, Com. Mahoney stated that the space
allocated to retail is under used and more peopie are needed to
obtain more retail dollars.
The Commissioners agreed on the following statements to send to the
City Council:
1. Current General Plan build out. Two LOS E intersections
acceptable, remainder to LOS D.
2. Ernphasize office and housing at expense of retail space
growth.
� 3. City does not need as much retail as allocated in the General
Plan, but needs more activity in existing spaces.
4. Encourage mixed: housing/retail
housing/office
housing/big office
office/retail
Com. Austin stated she would not be in support of a hotel in the
heart of the city.
Com. Mahoney stated he would, but does not think there is the
critical mass to create a heart of the city.
Com. Mann stated the hotel should be adjacent to retail as they
will feed on each other.
Com. Mahoney suggested the Town Center or Vallco. Gom. Mann
concurred.
Com. Fazekas stated the City has discourage a small hotel because
the City is waiting for a larger one. He stated if and when they
get the hotel, it could be in either Vallco or Town Center.
Mr. Mark Kroll, Prometheus, stated the hotel proposed has
restaurants, conference facilities, which cater to this particular
market. He stated marketing shows that a grand ball room is not
feasible. He stated the difference from a full service hotel and
what is being proposed is the Grand Ball room. He noted he would
call it a full service hotel. He stated the hotel industry is over
built at this time and does not think there is a chance of getting
two hotels within the City. In response to the Cornmissioners
questions Mr. Kroll stated they have invested a large amount of
money into the hotel, but they cannot get a construction loan. He
stated the City needs a hotel from a revenue stand point and should
take whatever they can.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of January 22, 1992
Page 6
The Commissioners reached a consensus on the following statement:
First - build a"full service" hotel (to include restaurant, room
service, meeting room etc)
Com. Fazekas stated the hotel should be user friendly.
The Commissioners went on to discuss housing.
City Planner Wordell explained the housing nexus study as outlined
in the staff report.
Com. Mahoney questioned if plus or minus 500 units would make a big
difference in the traffic impact. �
Mr. Viskovich stated it would make a difference, the traffic would
spread to other intersections.
Com. Mann stated people will take alternate routes, rather than sit
in the traf f ic .
City Planner Wordell stated the City needs to come up with an
additional 1000 units over the existing General Plan. She noted if
non-residential is decreased they won't need as much housing.
She stated the Planning Commission must figure what standard they
wish to use for the relationship between the jobs/housing.
Com. Austin stated she feels the housing is a regional issue.
It was a consensus to send the fvllowing statement to the City
Council:
The Planning Commission suggest building 2000 housing units (1000
more than in current General Plan). The housing number comes from
the Planning Commission's perception of need, not State or ABAG
requirements.
The Commissioners discussed the Heart of the City.
Mr. Cowan stated the Commissioners can talk about the need for the
heart and what type can be discussed after meetings with the
citizens after the General Plan has been adopted.
The issue discussed was where should the heart. be, at the
crossroads or not.
Com. Mann stated she is not in support of a Heart of the City.
Com. Mahoney stated it should not be at the crossroads, but create
a new street. Com. Austin concurred.
PLANNING COIKMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of January 22, 1992
Page 7
It was concluded that there was a 3-2 split on the Heart of the
City. Those in favor stated it should not be at the crossroads.
Com. Mahoney stated he would like to see it in the existing Town
Center. Commissioners Austin and Fazekas agreed.
Chr. Mackenzie requested that the Commissioners go through the
questionnaire as submitted by staff and return it to staff as soon
as possible.
Chr. Mackenzie opened the hearing for public input.
Mr. Phil Zeitman stated there are concerns regarding where all the
� expansions and housing will go. He questioned if buildings are
higher would this be acceptable to the City residents and expressed
concern about the appearance.
Mr. John Sobrato suggested that the Commissioners do not rely on
the traffic model presented by staff. He stated peoples habits
� change and demographics change. He stated much shopping is done by
i catalogues, therefore less people on the roads. He feels that any
housing developed should be open to all residents and not tied
� directly to the companies.
ADJOURNMENT: The Planning Commission adjourned at 9:40 P.M. to
the next Regular Meeting of January 27, 1992 at
6:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
' M .
Catherine M. Robillard,
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Planning Commission
at the Regular Meeting of , 1992
/s/ Don Mackenzie
Don Mackenzie, Chairman
Attest:
� Dorothv Cornelius
Dorothy ornelius, City Clerk