P&R 03-02-06
.
.
. . ""\
..~..\~_.
. ..
CUPERJINO
P ARKS AND RECREA nON COMMISSION
CITY OF CUPERTINO
REGULAR MEETING
THURSDA Y, MARCH 2,2006
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Peng called the regular meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission to
order at 7 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners present:
Staff present:
David Greenstein, Jeanne Bradford, Rod Brown, Roger
Peng
Therese Ambrosi Smith, Director
4. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
A. Regular meeting of February 2, 2006
ACTION:
The minutes of February 2, 2006, were accepted as written.
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Sixteen (12 Cupertino residents, 4 nonresidents) people spoke to the Commission
regarding the situation with DYSL and the Force. The main comments and concerns
were:
. The Force club is taking over the DYSL and forcing all players to join the Force
and pay high fees.
. The Force may be generating over $1 million in fees per year even though they
are a non-profit organization.
. The Force is dictating policy to the entire league.
. The Force's by-laws are unavailable and policies are changed at will.
. The Force is monopolizing the fields and permitting the best fields for its own
use.
. The Force is elbowing out volunteer coaches in favor of paid coaches.
. The Force is limiting choices and opportunities for non-Force teams.
. Nonresident teams who pay the fees to join the Force can use the fields rather
than the residents who pay the taxes for the fields.
. Amend rules to allow fair access to fields for small, local-based teams so they
can practice and play in Cupertino.
.
. Officially define "organization" in the field-use policy in such a way as to give
non-Force teams the status to apply for field permits.
Chairman Peng thanked the speakers for their input. At this time, Commissioner
Bradford requested that the agenda be reordered to take up Item 7B, Staff Oral Reports,
to continue the discussion on DYSL. Chairman Peng agreed to this request, and the
discussion continued.
7. MISCELLANEOUS - NO ACTION REQUIRED
B. Staff Oral Reports
a. Commissioner Bradford asked Linda, who spoke during Oral Communications, to
explain how DYSL is organized. Linda explained that CYSA is the parent
organization for DYSL and that CYSA has northern and southern divisions.
Cupertino is part of the northern division. Commissioner Bradford then asked
how teams interested in being "independent" would fit into this scheme. Linda
deferred the question to Pedro Cortopassi, another speaker heard during Oral
Communications.
Mr. Cortopassi said that the state organization governs the local leagues through
the district. CYSA North is subdivided into nine districts. Cupertino is in District
2, one of the largest districts. District 2 is further subdivided into local leagues,
which includes the DYSL. If there is an area that is not in the jurisdiction of a
local league, a group can petition the state organization to form a new league.
However in the Cupertino area, it would be almost impossible to form a new
league because league boundaries overlap. An option would be to create a small
organization that is composed of independent teams in the DYSL under the Force
umbrella. Commissioner Bradford asked Mr. Cortopassi if, based on the current
by-laws of the CYSA, a league could be formed to compete in their jurisdiction.
He stated that it could not.
Director Smith gave a brief history of the DYSL issue. She stated that August
2004 was the last time this issue was addressed. The City began collecting field-
use fees in January 2005. When field-use fees began to be collected, City Council
directed that Cupertino residents get a break. This made it necessary to look at
team rosters and determine residency. In 2004, it was discovered that DYSL had
32 percent residency, which was in violation of the City's policy requiring them
to have at least 51 percent residents. It became apparent that a large number of
children would be displaced if the City adhered to the 51 percent residency
requirement. City Council decided to remove the residency requirement and
establish a fee structure based on priority. Volunteer-coached teams get a break
whether they are resident or nonresident. The nonresident teams that receive
professional coaching pay the highest fees. Director Smith went on to say that
most surrounding cities do require 51 percent residency. When City Council
decided to do away with the residency requirement, it allowed the Force to cast a
broader net and recruit nonresident players. In order to make money, the Force
needs the best players on its teams to continue to attract other talented players.
Director Smith believes that the Force probably has less than the 32 percent
residency it had in 2004 but has not verified whether that is true. In Director
Smith's opinion, the members of the Force organization are responsible for
controlling what goes on in the club, and she is not sure how the City would
control the Force. She does feel, however, that eliminating the residency
requirement may have contributed the current situation.
Director Smith suggested putting this issue on the agenda for April and
notifying interested parties on both sides. After hearing both sides of the
issue, the Commission could recommend to City Council that the policy be
amended.
Director Smith would like to hear more testimony on the idea of a team being
recognized as an organization in order to apply for field permits. She did not
understand how a team could compete if it was not part of a league. If the
non-Force teams want to play recreationally and not competitively, they could
join A YSO.
Director Smith pointed out that even though DYSL has internal problems,
they are getting a large number of players onto the fields. She is concerned
that issuing field permits to individual teams will result in displacing players
on the fields. Currently, the organization holds the permits and several teams
are able to practice on a field at one time.
Chairman Peng agreed that the item should be on the agenda for the next
meeting so the Commission can hear from both sides on the issue and do their
own internal investigation. Commissioners Bradford, Brown, and Greenstein
believe that the issue is worth looking into. Commissioners Bradford and
Brown were present during the August 2004 meeting when parents of DYSL
were very upset with the City for enforcing the residency requirement.
Commissioner Bradford said City cannot control the DYSL rules, but the
Commission can help parents get Cupertino kids back on Cupertino fields.
Commissioner Greenstein said that the Commission does need to hear both
sides of the issue but is there for Cupertino residents first.
Director Smith asked if going back to 51 percent residency would fix the
problem or would it ruin the teams. Pedro Cortopassi explained that it would
be difficult to maintain competitive teams and a high level of Cupertino
residency. Because the recreational league is small (approximately 120
players) and the competitive league is large (approximately 800 players), the
competitive league needs players from outside Cupertino to maintain its
competitive edge. This has created an inverted pyramid. Mr. Cortopassi said
ideally the recreational league should be large and interested players from the
recreational league would advance to the competitive league.
Item 6, New Business, was taken up next in agenda order.
.
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Presentation by Gary Chao, Community Development Department, Toll Brothers
project - Council Action and request that the Commission be apprised of changes
to the plan.
Gary Chao stated that the Toll Brothers project was referred to the Commission
by City Council from their February 7, 2006, meeting. The project is being built
on 26 acres, bounded by Tantau to the east, Stevens Creek to the south, the new
Rose Bowl and Menlo Equities projects to the west, and partially 280 to the north.
Both the Council and the Commission have reviewed past designs of this site
plan. The first design proposed in 2004 had only a 1.4 acre site for this park. The
general direction was fewer units, more commercial, and more park. In the site
plan presented to you in September of 2005, the park was a sliver of 3.5 acres.
The general consensus from the Planning Commission, the Park Commission, and
Director Smith was that we wanted a more rectangular park to better facilitate the
types of programs that could be presented at this site. At their February 7
meeting, City Council stated they would like a contiguous 3.5 acre park. The plan
that was submitted to City Council included a park that was approximately 2.79
acres, plus a panhandle portion that is about .7 acres. The Council's direction was
that they would rather have a full 3.5 acre park, south of West Terrace along
Stevens Creek. Because the size of the park is being increased, the size of the
West Terrace project must be decreased. Toll Brothers has revised their site
design to allow for a larger park south of West Terrace. Now they are proposing
a 3.5 acre rectangular park, plus a 50-foot sliver for passive use. From staffs
perspective, this allows more flexibility for future programming.
Commission will be asked to design the park at a later stage, but City Council
would like to hear the Commission's comments at their March 21, 2006, meeting.
Commissioner Greenstein asked what kind of park City Council wants this to be.
Director Smith responded that the only direction City Council has given so far is
that they do not want it to be an athletic field. It will be a great place to view the
fireworks on July 4th, possibly with a concert backdrop. It is important that the
trees be planted in such a way that they don't obstruct the view. The park will be
a little larger and deeper than Library Field but in a location similar to Cali Mill
Plaza, so there will be traffic noise to contend with. The park has a lot of
potential, and it would be worth it to have some community visioning.
Commissioner Bradford asked if there would be a tot lot or something similar.
Director Smith said it is up to us to decide what the park will be. There will be a
lot of entry-level housing, which will attract young families.
Gary Chao added that this is the portion of the public park that Toll Brothers is
presenting to the City, fully improved. There is quite a bit of open space and
opportunities for more intimate, private areas, which could be used for tot lots. In
the part of the project called The Villas, there is going to be a community room
and some open space. There will be courtyards for the residents. After Council
approves the zoning, the detailed landscaping plan will come back to you for
comments and suggestions.
Commissioner Bradford requested that the existing neighbors be asked to share
their ideas about the park since it is a neighborhood park for them as well.
Director Smith said we would get the mailing list.
Commissioner Greenstein said it was important to know where the senior housing
would be located in order to plan the park space accordingly, and that in addition
to getting input from the existing community, it is important to look at what the
new members of the community might want. Gary Chao explained the current
plan calls for a total of 380 units, with 80 of them being for seniors. The senior
housing was placed in the northern most area of the parcel since it is a more
secure location, and it does have its own area for the seniors to use. The park
being planned is meant not only for the residents of the Toll Brothers project, but
for the public as well.
Commissioner Peng asked Gary Chao to talk about the areas surrounding the
park. Gary said Stevens Creek is to the south, across the street is mixed
residential and commercial, and the Rancho neighborhood is south of that. A
Menlo Equities project that is currently under construction and mostly residential,
with some mixed-use commercial, will immediately benefit from the park. The
Council has also approved a Rose Bowl condominium mixed-use project. North
of the site it is predominantly industrial office space.
Commission Brown asked for clarification on the Council's "no sports fields"
comment. Gary Chao explained that a sports field would take up most of the area.
The possibility of something smaller, such as a basketball court, was mentioned as
being desirable.
Jo Price, a representative from Toll Brothers, said that they have worked
diligently with the City, the community, and staff, to design a park with many
different elements to meet the requirements of the City with many benefits for the
community. Council asked that the active and passive uses be combined into a
continuous 3.5-acre park. Community meetings will be held to ask for input; and
in the future, Toll Brothers will be working with the City and the Commission to
design the park. At this time, opening the creek is not part of the plan; however,
Toll Brothers is being asked to contribute funds to a potential future trail along
Calabasas Creek and link with other projects in the future.
Public art will be proposed and reviewed at the architectural site as part of the
landscaping site review. Council and Planning Commission want elaborate
gateway artwork at Tantau since this is the east entrance into Cupertino. There
.
will be a detailed landscaping plan that will be reviewed by Parks and Recreation
Commission and the Arts Commission.
Commissioner Peng asked if the Commission was receiving this information for
their awareness or a recommendation. Director Smith explained that because the
plan had been changed, the Commission needed to know about it. The visioning
would include noticing those who will be most affected by it, but information will
be on agendas and the City's web site for everyone to access.
7. MISCELLANEOUS - NO ACTION REQUIRED
A. Written Communications: None
B. Staff Oral Reports:
a. This item was taken out of order to continue the discussion ofthe DYSL
situation from Oral Communications. See pages 1-3.
b. Director Smith announced that Marie Miller, the Parks and Recreation
Department Administrative Assistant for over five years, will be retiring May
17; however, for medical reasons she will no longer be working. Marie had
brain surgery and will start treatment soon. A new Department
Administrative Assistant will be hired to take over her duties.
C. Commissioner Community Contacts: None
8. ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Peng adjourned the meeting at 8:50 p.m.
p ctfully submitted,
e Ie Irwin
Melanie Irwin, Senior Office Assistant