Loading...
Reso 465 80,000.6 6-v-67 RESOLUTION N0 �65 OF THE PLA NNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THE GRANTIN� OF A VARIANCE to permit more than 20 units per lot in a Residential Multiple ER3-2.2� zone; the entire residential property to constitute one lot. APPLICANT: Danica Komenovich - Frank Kohles ADDRESS: 90 E. Gish Road, San Jose, California SUBMITTED: July 7, 1967 LOCATION: South side of Homestead Road, adjacent to easterly boundary of Homestead High School ZONE: R3-2a2 AREA: 7.87 acres --------------------------------------------------------------- FURTHER FINDINGS: None PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of November, 1967 at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Bryson, Frolich, Horgan, Buthenuth NAYS: Commissioner Hirshon APPROVED: ^ � _ _ _ � �` ZuGG/ ohn . Buthenuth �, ' Planning Commission ATTEST: �C�� D���?i1�1�1 �lil Adde Laurin Director of Planning -2- C I T Y 0 F C U P E R T I N 0 City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 9501� Telephone: (�08� 252-4505 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THE GRANTI�IG�' OF A VARIANCE WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a VARIANCE, as stated on Page 2; and WHEREAS the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support his said application; and WHEREAS the application shows: 1. That there are special conditions or exceptional characteristics in the nature of the property to be affected, or that its loca- tion or its surroundings are such as will permit �he Commission to make a determination that a literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships; and 2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the preserv�,- tion and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and 3. That the hearings show that the granting of thz application will not materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neigh�ornood of' the property which is the subject of the application, and that the use of said property in the manner in which it �s propose�� to be used will not be mate- rially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the value of property or improvements located in said surroundings; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, f'acts, exhib:its and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the VARIANCE be, and the same is, hereby recommended for approval to the City Council of the City of Cupertino for appropriate ac�ion, subject to the con- ditions stated on Page 2; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the aforementioned �'indings are approved and adopted, and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directe� to notify the parties af- fected by this decision. (Continued on Page 2� -�-