Reso 444 80,000.6
7-v-67
'RESOLUTION N0. ���
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING THE DENIAL OF A VARIANCE to permit a�-foot fence
where the ordinance allows a 3-foot fence.
APPLICANT: Louis H. Siddons
ADDRESS Z996o Pear Tree Lane, Cupertino, California
SUBMITTED: July 14 1967
LOCATION 1996o Pear Tree Lane, Cupertino, California
ZONE: R1-7.5 AREA: 1/� acre
------------------------------------------------------------------
FURTHER FINDINGS: None
PASSED AND ADOPTED this l�th day of August, 1967 at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino,
State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Frolich, Hirshon, Horgan, Buthenuth
NAYS: Commissioner Bryson
AP 0 D: d���
U�� -
o n W. Buthenuth
Chairman
ATTES T :
Planning Commission
Q G� o�G�(iGlh.� �1.�
Adde Laurin
Director of Planning
-2-
C I T Y 0 F C U P E R T� N 0
City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 9501�
Telephone: (�08� 252-�505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMM�SSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING THE DENIAL OF A V�RIANCE
WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the Cit,y of Cupertino received an
application for a VARIANCE, as stated on Page 2, and
WHEREAS the applicant has NOT met the burden of proof required to
support his said application, and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission finds �hat �he application does NOT
meet all of the following requirements:
l. That there are special conditions or exceptional characteristics
in the nature of the property to be affected, or that its loca-
tion or its surroundings are such as will permit the Commission
to make a determination that a literal enforcement of the Ordi-
nance would result in pract�ical difficulties or unnecessary hard-
ships; and
2. That the granting of the ap�lication is necessary for the pre-
servation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and
3• That the granting of the application will not materially affect
adversely the health or safe�y of persons residing or working
in the r�eighborhood of the propert.y which is the su�bject of the
application, and that the use of said property in the manner
which it is proposed to b;e.used will not be materially detri-
mental to the public welfare or injurious to the value of the
property or improvements located in said surroundings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and other
evidence submitted in this matter, the applic�tion for the VARIANCE
be, and the same is, hereby NOT recommended for �pproval to the City
Cour�;c��' c�f: the ��C�ty of Cupertino; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the findings quoted above and on �age 2 are approved and adopted,
and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed - �o notify the
parties affected by this decision,
(Continued on Page 2�
-1-