Reso 443 80,000.6
6-v-67
RESOLUTION N0. ��3
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING THE DENIAL OF A VARIANCE to permit more than 20 units
per lot and more than 16 units per gross acre.
APPLICANT: Danica Komenovich (Frank Kohles�
ADDRESS: 90 E. Gish Road, San Jose, California
SUBMITTED: July 7, 1967
LOCATION: South side of Homestead Road, adjacent to easterly
boundary of Homestead High School
ZONE: R3-2.2 AREA.: 7.87 acres
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FURTHER FINDINGS: None
PASSED AND ADOPTED this l�th day of August, 1967, at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino,
State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Bryson, Frolich, Hirshon, Horgan and
Buthenuth
NAYS: None
� AP 0 D : j�
���
n W. Buthenuth
Chairman .
Planning Commission
ATTEST:
l.�( �G� �K
Adde Laurin
Director of Planning
-2-
C T T Y 0 F C U P E R T I N 0
City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
Telephone: (�08) 252-�505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF' THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING THE DENIAL OF A VARIANCE
WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a VARIANCE, as stated on Page 2, and
WHEREAS the applicant has NOT met the burden of proof required to
support his said application, and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission finds that the application does NOT
meet all of the following requirements:
1. That there are special conditions or exceptional characteristics
in the nature of the property to be affected, or that its loca-
tion or its surroundings are such as will permit the Commission
to make a determination �hat a literal enforcement of the Ordi-
nance would result in practical d�fficulties or unnecessary hard-
ships; and
2. That the granting of the ap��ication is necessary for the pre-
servation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and
3• That the granting of the application will not materially affect
adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working
in the neighborhood of the property which is the subject of the
application, and that the use of said property in the manner
which it is proposed to b:e �sed will not be materially detri-
mental to the public welfare or injurious to the value of the
property or improvements located in said surroundings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and other
evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the VARIANCE
be, and the same is, hereby NOT recommended for approval to the City
Cour"ic_��':c�f: the � C�ty of Cupertino; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the findings quoted above and on Page 2 are approved and adopted,
and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to notify the
parties affected by this decision.
' (Continued on Page 2�
-1-