Reso 393 ` 80,000.6
lo—v-66
RESOLUTION NO 393
OF THE PLANNING COMMIS�I�N OF THE CITY OF CUPERTTNO
DENYING THE GRANTING OF A 1TARIANCE to th2 Sign Ordinance
to increase the height of a ground sign to 2� feet
APPLICANTe Union Oi1 Com��,ny
ADDRESS 22390 Homest2ad Ro�,d
SUBMITTED: December 29, 1966
LOCATION 22390 Home��2ad Road
ZONE: CG AREA� 3/� acre
-------------------�---�--------------------------------------------
PASSED AND ADOPTED thi.s 23rd a�y of January 1967 at a regular
meeting of the Plannir�g Commission of the City of Cupertino,
State of California, by the following roll ca�.l vote:
AYES: Commissioners Bryson, Buthenuth, ��ro. Horgan, Hirshon
NAYS: None
P OVED;
f
�-- �
/ ; l Jack T. Hirshon
Ch �, i rman
Planning Commission
ATTESTo
� G'�� o�.l�l:1i(� n�
Adde Laurin
Director of Planr�ing
-2-
C I T Y 0 F C U P E R T I N 0
City Hall, 10321 South Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road
Cupertino, California 9501�
Telephone: (�08) 252-�505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNTNG COMMISSION OF THL CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING THE DENIAL OF A VARIANCE.
T�HEREAS, the Plannina Commission of the City of Cupertino
received an application for a VARIANCL, as stated on page two and
WHEREAS, the applic�nt has NOT met the burden of proof required
to support his said application
?fdHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application does
NOT meet all of the following requirements:
1. That there are special conditions or exceptional character-
i�tics in the n�ture of the property to be affected, or that its
loca�tion, oz• its sur_�oundin�s are such as will permit the Commission
�o make a determination that a literal enforc�ment of the Ordinance
would result in practical diff'iculties or unnecessary hardships and
2. That the Uranting of the application is necessary for the
nr.cser�ation and enjoyment of su'�stantial property rights; and
3. That the gra:�tin� of the application will not materially
affect advzrsel,y the health or safety of persons resi_ding or working
in the neighborhood of the property which is the subject of the
application, and that the use of said property in the manner which
it is proposed to be used will not be materially detrimentaJ_ to the
public welfare or injurious to the value o.f the proper�ty or improve-
ments locatzd in said surroundings
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and
other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the
VARIANCE be, and the same is, hereby NOT recommended for approval
to the City Council of the City of Cupertino_ and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the findings quoted above and on page two are approved and
adopted, and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to noti#'y
the parties affected by this decision.
(Continued on Page 2)