03. U-2006-06
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM
Application: U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06 Agenda Date: July 11, 2006
TR-2006-09 (EA-2006-09)
Applicant: Giff Chang, Chang Architecture
Property Owner: 1200 San Mateo Avenue, LLC
Property Location: 10495 N. De Anza Boulevard (APN 326-33-110)
Project Data:
General Plan Designation: Light Industrial/Commercial/Residential
Existing Zoning Designation: P(CG, ML, Res 4-10)
Net Acres: 1.658 acres
Existing Office Building Area: 27,000 square feet (to be demolished)
Proposed Office Building Area: 60,000 square feet
Proposed Building Height/Stories: 45 feetj 3 stories
Parking Required: 211 spaces
Parking Provided: 216 spaces
N. De Anza Blvd. Setback: 58' 7" -107'
Mariani Ave. Setback: 37' average
Project Consistency with: General Plan yes North De Anza Blvd. Zoning yes
Environmental Assessment: Negative Declaration
Application Summary:
USE PERMIT and ARCHITECTURAL & SITE APPROVAL to demolish a 27,000 square
foot office building and construct a new 60,000 square foot office building with a two
level above grade parking structure.
TREE REMOVAL to allow the removal and replacement of 21 trees to accommodate a
60,000 square foot office building
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council
approval of the use permit, architectural & site approval and tree removal per the
model resolutions.
BACKGROUND:
Site Description & History:
The project site is at the southwest comer of North De Anza Boulevard and Mariani
Avenue, which is a signalized intersection. The site is completely surrounded by other
:3/{
U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09
Page 2
July 11, 2006
office developments. The closest residential property (about 360 feet away) will be the
recently approved Greenleaf subdivision at the easterly terminus of Greenleaf Drive.
The property was originally developed in the mid-1970's as a specialty ski retailer by
Any Mountain. A second building was later added toward the rear on another parcel
and it housed administrative offices, a ski rental business and a skiing demonstration
facility. By the mid-1990's, a declining market for recreational skiing led to the
conversion of both buildings to office uses. The rear office building/ property was sold
to a different property owner several years ago and is not part of this project.
Project Description:
The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing office building and construct a
60,000 square-foot, three-story, speculative office building. The building is sited to
frame both North De Anza Boulevard and Mariani Avenue. The driveway is located
on the Mariani Avenue side street. An ingress/egress easement allows vehicular
circulation with the office parking lot to the rear with direct access to Bandley Drive.
There are two building entrances: one facing N. De Anza Blvd with a pedestrian
connection to the sidewalk and intersection, and another entrance facing the parking
structure toward the rear.
The building will be served by surface parking and a two-level above grade parking
structure with the drive-up ramp located on the southern portion of the property.
DISCUSSION:
General Plan Confonnance:
The project would replace an outmoded building originally built for a specialty retailer
with a new class-A office building that is compatible with the surrounding land uses. It
would enhance the identity of North De Anza Boulevard as a regional employment
center and maintain the area as a cohesive office park.
The North De Anza Boulevard Planning Area provides a general plan office
development allocation of 218,185 square feet. The net needed building square footage,
33,000 square feet, can be accommodated by the planning area development allocation,
even with the expanded Public Storage facility on Bandley Drive (net new building area
of 110,963 square feet).
Staff is concerned about the limited square footage allocation available in the North De
Anza planning area. When the Public Storage application returns to the City Council,
staff is going to recommend that the square footage allocation attributed to this project
be reduced to more accurately reflect the limited amount of traffic and employees. If
the City Council agrees, then the future available office allocation will increase.
2
3~
U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09
Page 3
July 11, 2006
General Plan Policy no. 2-42: Revenue Analysis of Office Developments states:
/fIn reviewing office development proposals, encourage office uses and activities that
generate significant revenues to the City, such as local sales offices, capturing point of
sale internet transactions and business to business tax revenues. New office
development exceeding 50,000 square feet shall be approved only if one of these or
similar benefits are provided."
As this is a speculative office development with no current prospective tenant it is not
possible to perform this type of revenue analysis. The use permit would need to be
restricted to require the revenue analysis at a future date and the qualification of
potential office tenants. A condition is included to this effect.
North De Anza Boulevard Conceptual Zoning Conformance:
The project was designed to preserve as much of the existing mature landscaping
fronting N. De Anza Boulevard as possible as this is one of the key design concepts of
the zoning plan and one of the primary visual characteristics of the area. To accomplish
this, the front setback was widened from 50 feet (minimum 35 feet measured from the
curb face) to a minimum of 58+ feet to 107 feet in order to preserve as many of the
mature redwoods and Deodar Cedars that occupy the frontage.
The side setback from Mariani Avenue (measured from face of curb) also meets the
zoning with a minimum width of 19 feet and an average depth of 37 feet where the
standard is 25 feet on average.
Other zoning/ design considerations are met, including keeping vehicular access to the
side streets (Mariani and Bandley) and locating parking toward the rear.
Architecture:
The design was reviewed by City Architect, Larry Cannon (Exhibit A). The main
design concepts were to create a design that was compatible with the surrounding office
buildings in the area and add pedestrian details that would integrate the use into the
surrounding environment.
One of the main features of surrounding office buildings is the balance of solid and
transparent elements arranged in horizontal bands. This concept was taken into
account in the design of the building with horizontal bands of glass, stucco and metal.
Pedestrian details include ground level1ight fixtures, an entry canopy and a prominent
pedestrian entrance to De Anza Boulevard (See landscape plan).
Traffic:
The Public Works Department reviewed the traffic impacts of the larger office building.
It concluded that the net increase of 33,000 office square feet would not require a
3
3'3
U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09
Page 4
July 11, 2006
Congestion Management Agency traffic impact analysis, nor would the increased office
traffic deteriorate traffic LOS below acceptable standards. The Department advised that
traffic signal timing at the nearby intersection might need adjustment to account for
existing and expected increased pedestrian movements in the area.
Trees:
The applicant is requesting to remove a number of significant size trees that are part of
the original Any Mountain landscape plan. The consulting arborist inventoried 58 trees
on the property, with 21 proposed for removal to accommodate the new office building
footprint and parking structure. A location map of the removed trees is shown in the
arborist report prepared by Walter Levison, #WC3172, (Exhibit B).
An Mountain Trees Pro osed for Removal
1
33,34, 35,37,38,
40,41,42,47,48,
49,50, 52, 53, 54,
55, & 56
6
36 & 39
Total
1 25.5/14
17 20, 17.7, 14.7, 28,26.2,
16/14, 12.3, 13.5, 18.9,
25.7, 14.7, 12.8, 15, 23.1,
10.8, 12.9, & 15.2
1 13.3
2 8.8,8.7,
21
Deodar Cedar
Coast Redwood
uidambar
There is an unusually high number of larger trees on the property, including the
parking lot. Staff believes this was intentional and in keeping with an environment that
ski retailer, Any Mountain, was trying to create.
The applicant is proposing to replant with 18 trees: Eastern Redbud, Ornamental Pear
and Hybrid Madrone. These trees will grow to smaller sizes, but are more in keeping
with the size of the landscape areas being proposed. Because of the size of the trees
being proposed for removal, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)
recommended that larger size replacement trees be planted where possible. Staff has
identified the four proposed Madrones as the best candidates because of their larger
growing zones. Staff is recommending 48" box Madrone trees.
The consulting arborist has re~ommended a series of actions to protect the trees
intended for preservation from constructiori activities. These are incorporated in the
conditions of approval by reference. The City Arborist's report has not been received
yet, but we expect it by the hearing date.
4
34
U-2006-06, ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09
Page 5
July 11, 2006
Potential Parking Structure Glare and Noise:
The ERC was concerned about potential noise and glare from an elevated parking
structure. Staff examined the situation and noted that the garage was 360 feet away
from the nearest potential residential development (Greenleaf subdivision). One third
of the parking structure length was blocked by existing taller office buildings. The
other two-thirds was obscured by parking lot landscaping, a masonry wall and a row of
40-50 foot trees on the residential property.
To mitigate any potential glare, the garage includes a 3.5-foot tall wall along the upper
levels and a condition has been added to the conditions of approval, requiring cut-off
fixtures for any parking garage outdoor lighting.
Enclosures:
Model Resolutions for use permit, architectural & site approval and tree removal
Initial Study and ERC Recommendation
Exhibit A: Design Comments from Larry Cannon
Exhibit B: Arborist Report prepared by Walter Levison, dated 5/12/06
Plan Set
Prepared by:
Approved by:
Colin Jung, Senior Planner
Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development
g:planning/ pc/ pdreportfUSEreportf 2006 /U-2006-06
5
3-5
U-2006-06
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
MODEL RESOLUTION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING AFPROV AL OF A USE PERMIT TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING
27,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT A 60,000 SQUARE
FCXJT OFFICE BUILDING AND PARKING STRUCTURE.
SECTION I: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application'
for a Use Permit, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the
Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held
one or more public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and has satisfied the following requirements:
1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience;
2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the
Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby recommended for
approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on
Page 2 thereof; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
No. U-2006-06 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of July
11, 2006, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
3----10
Model Resolution
Page 2
U-2006-06
July 11, 2006
SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
U-2006-06
Cliff Chang
10495 N. De Anza Boulevard
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The recommendation of approval is based on a plan set titled: II Any Mountain
Office Building II consisting of 13 sheets labeled: C, Al, A2, A2.1, A2.2, A3, A4,
C1 through C-5 and CL1, except as may be amended by the Conditions
contained in this Resolution.
2. DEVELOPMENT APPROV AL
Approval is granted to construct a 60,000 square foot office building with a 2-
level above grade parking structure.
3. OFFICE TENANT RESTRICTIONS
The building occupancy shall be limited to office tenants/companies that
generate significant revenues to the City, such as a local sales office, capturing
point of sale internet transactions or business to business tax revenues. The
applicant shall demonstrate that at least one of these revenue streams occurs or
the tenant(s) provide similar benefits.
4. BICYCLE PARKING
The applicant shall provide bicycle parking and bike racks for the proposed
project in accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.100
of the Cupertino Municipal Code.
5. DEMOLmON REQUIREMENTS
All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum
extent feasible subject to the Building Official approval. The applicant shall
provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final
demolition permits.
6. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION
The applicant shall receive an allocation of 33,000 square feet of the office
industrial allocations for the North De Anza Boulevard Planning Area.
,
3~7
Model Resolution
Page 3
U-2006-06
July 11, 2006
7. LANDSCAPE PLAN
The applicant shall submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be
reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to
issuance of building permits. The landscape plan shall include:
a) water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with
Chapter 14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures
referenced in Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed
Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code.
b) Four 48" box Arbutus Marina trees in lieu of the 24" box trees proposed.
c) Landscaping where feasible to soften the appearance of the westerly side of
the parking structure.
8. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER
EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute
written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified
that the 9O-day approval period in which you may protest these fees,
dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period
complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
9. PUBLIC ART
The applicant shall install public art onsite prior to final occupancy. The public
art shall be valued at a minimum of one-quarter percent (1/4%) of the total
project budget, not to exceed $100,000. The applicant shall submit a public art
plan to be reviewed by the Fine Arts Commission prior to installation of the
public art.
10. SCREENING
All mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be
screened so they are not visible from public street areas or adjoining
developments. Screening materials/colors shall match building features and
materials. The height of the screening shall be taller than the height of the
mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen. The location of equipment
and necessary screening shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of
Conununity Development prior to issuance of building permits.
11. TREE PROTECTION
Prior to the issuance of grading and demolition permits, the applicant shall enter
into a contract with an ISA-certified arborist to review and comment on all
construction drawings and monitor grading, demolition and building
3~
Model Resolution
Page 4
U-2006-06
July 11, 2006
construction to ensure that the recommendations described in an arborist report
titled: "Tree Assessment and Recommendations for the Redevelopment Project
Proposed at 10495 North De Anza, Cupertino, California, II prepared by Walter
Levison and dated 5/12/06. Applicant shall provide a copy of the contract to
the Director of Community Development.
The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified
arborist with a confirmation letter sent to the Director of Corrununity
Development prior to issuance of grading and demolition permits. The
supervising arborist shall monitor construction activities and prepare a final
report ascertaining the health of the protected trees prior to issuance of final
occupancy.
12. TREE PROTECTION BOND
The applicant shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $100,000 to
ensure protection of the trees slated for preservation prior to issuance of grading,
demolition or building permits. The bond shall be returned after completion of
construction, subject to a letter from the City arborist indicating that the trees are
in good condition.
13. DESIGN REVIEW OF PARKING STRUCTURE
The design of parking structure is not approved with this application. The
applicant shall submit an ASA application to the Design Review Committee with
additional architectural enhancements to the parking structure.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
14. STREET WIDENING
Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City
Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
15. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed In
accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
16. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION
Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer.
Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of
visual interference to adjoining properties, and. shall be no higher than the
maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located.
9-'1
Model Resolution
Page 5
U-2006-06
July 11, 2006
17. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire
as needed.
18. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance
with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404
permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or Regional
Water Quality Control Board as appropriate.
19. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
20. FIRE PROTECTION
Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the
City as needed.
21. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities
Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of
Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of
underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing
utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the
affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
22. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of
Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking
and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under
grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of
construction permits.
Fees:
a. Checking & Inspection Fees:
$ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or
$3,440.00 minimum
$ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or
$2,000.00 minimum
$ 1,000.00
$ 4,013.39
b. Grading Permit:
c. Development Maintenance Deposit:
d. Storm Drainage Fee:
e. Power Cost:
f. Map Checking Fees:
g. Park Fees:
h. Street Tree
**
N/A
N/A
By Developer
**
Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC
3,{0
Model Resolution
Page 6
U-2006-06
July 11, 2006
Bonds:
a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements
b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement
c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
-The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule
adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified
at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the
event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then
current fee schedule.
23. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment
enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground
such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. In addition the
transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area.
24. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water
Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans
shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or
sediment control plan shall be provided.
25. STORMW ATER QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT PROTECTS
For a project creating or replacing one (1) acre or more of impervious surface, the
applicant must fulfill the City's storm water quality requirements, which includes
but is not limited to a Storm Water Management Plan/Notice of Intent (NOI),
BMP operation and maintenance responsibilities and BMP inspection and
reporting.
26. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to
be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for
work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during
construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City
prior to commencement of work.
The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTeD)
standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City.
27. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS
The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs
Department in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development.
?rll
Model Resolution
Page 7
U-2006-06
July 11, 2006
28. TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING
The applicant shall review traffic signal timing for the North De Anza
Blvd.fMariani Avenue intersection with the objective of improving safety for
existing and expected pedestrian movements.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of July 2006, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Marty Miller, Chairperson
Planning Commission
G: \ Planning \ PD REPOR T\ RES \ 2006 \ U-2006-06.doc
3-1.J1
ASA-2006-06
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
MODEL RESOLUTION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APFROV AL
FOR A NEW 60,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING AND PARKING
STRUCTURE.
----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------......-------------
SECTION I: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application
for an Architectural and Site Approval, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the
Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held
one or more public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and has satisfied the following requirements:
1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience;
2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the
Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application for Architectural and Site Approval is hereby
recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this
Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and
That the subconc1usions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
No. ASA-2006-06 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of
July 11, 2006, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
3~/3
Resolution No.
Page 2
ASA-2006-06
July 11, 2006
SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
ASA-2006-06
Cliff Chang
10495 N. De Anza Boulevard
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The recommendation of approval is based on a plan set titled: /I Any Mountain
Office Building II consisting of 13 sheets labeled: C, Al, A2, A2.1, A2.2, A3, A4,
Cl through C-5 and CL1, except as may be amended by the Conditions
contained in this Resolution.
2. DEVELOPMENT APPROV AL
Approval is granted to construct a 60,000 square foot office building with a 2-
level above grade parking structure.
3. OFFICE TENANT RESTRICTIONS
The building occupancy shall be limited to office tenants/companies that
generate significant revenues to the City, such as a local sales office, capturing
point of sale internet transactions or business to business tax revenues. The
applicant shall demonstrate that at least one of these revenue streams occurs or
the tenant(s) provide similar benefits.
4. BICYCLE PARKING
The applicant shall provide bicycle parking and bike racks for the proposed
project in accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.100
of the Cupertino Municipal Code.
5. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS
All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum.
extent feasible subject to the Building Official approval. The applicant shall
provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final
demolition permits.
6. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION
The applicant shall receive an allocation of 33,000 square feet of the office
industrial allocations for the North De Anza Boulevard Planning Area.
13 ... J 1-
Resolution No.
Page 3
ASA-2006-06
July 11, 2006
~ LANDSCAPE PLAN
The applicant shall submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be
reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to
issuance of building permits. The landscape plan shall include:
a) water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with
Chapter 14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures
referenced in Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed
Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code.
b) Four 48" box Arbutus Marina trees in lieu of the 24" box trees proposed.
c) Landscaping where feasible to soften the appearance of the westerly side of
the parking structure.
8. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER
EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute
written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified
that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees,
dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(a), has begun. H you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period
complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
9. PUBLIC ART
The applicant shall install public art onsite prior to final occupancy. The public
art shall be valued at a minimum of one-quarter percent (1/4%) of the total
project budget, not to exceed $100,000. The applicant shall submit a public art
plan to be reviewed by the Fine Arts Commission prior to installation of the
public art.
10. SCREENING
All mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be
screened so they are not visible from public street areas or adjoining
developments. Screening materials/colors shall match building features and
materials. The height of the screening shall be taller than the height of the
mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen. The location of equipment
and necessary screening shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of
Community Development prior to issuance of building permits.
11. TREE PROTECTION
Prior to the issuance of grading and demolition permits, the applicant shall enter
into a contract with an ISA-certified arborist to review and comment on all
construction drawings and monitor grading, demolition and building
815
Resolution No.
Page 4
ASA-2006-06
July 11, 2006
construction to ensure that the recommendations described in an arborist report
titled: "Tree Assessment and Recommendations for the Redevelopment Project
Proposed at 10495 North De Anza, Cupertino, California, II prepared by Walter
Levison and dated 5/12/06. Applicant shall provide a copy of the contract to
the Director of Community Development.
The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified
arborist with a confirmation letter sent to the Director of Conununity
Development prior to issuance of grading and demolition permits. The
supervising arborist shall monitor construction activities and prepare a final
report ascertaining the health of the protected trees prior to issuance of final
occupancy.
12. TREE PROTECTION BOND
The applicant shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $100,000 to
ensure protection of the trees slated for preservation prior to issuance of grading,
demolition or building permits. The bond shall be returned after completion of
construction, subject to a letter from the City arborist indicating that the trees are
in good condition.
13. DESIGN REVIEW OF PARKING STRUCTURE
The design of parking structure is not approved with this application. The
applicant shall submit an ASA application to the Design Review Committee with
additional architectural enhancements to the parking structure.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
14. STREETWlDENING
Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City
Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
15. CURB AND GUITER IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed m
accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
16. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION
Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer.
Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of
visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the
maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located.
3--lb
Resolution No.
Page 5
ASA-2006-06
July 11, 2006
17. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire
as needed.
18. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance
with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404
permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and! or Regional
Water Quality Control Board as appropriate.
19. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
20. FIRE PROTECTION
Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the
City as needed.
21. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities
Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of
Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of
underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing
utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the
affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
22. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of
Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking
and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under
grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of
construction permits.
Fees:
a. Checking & Inspection Fees:
c. Development Maintenance Deposit:
d. Storm Drainage Fee:
e. Power Cost:
f. Map Checking Fees:
g. Park Fees:
h. Street Tree
$ 6 % of Off-Site Improvement Cost or
$3,440.00 minimum
$ 6 % of Site Improvement Cost or
$2,000.00 minimum
$ 1,000.00
$ 4,013.39
b. Grading Permit:
**
N/A
N/A
By Developer
**
Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC
911
Resolution No.
Page 6
ASA-2006-06
July 11, 2006
Bonds:
a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site
Improvements
b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement
c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
-The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule
adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified
at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the
event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then
current fee schedule.
23. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment
enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground
such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. In addition the
transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area.
24. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water
Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans
shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or
sediment control plan shall be provided.
25. STORMWATER QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT PROTECTS
For a project creating or replacing one (1) acre or more of impervious surface, the
applicant must fulfill the City's storm water quality requirements, which includes
but is not limited to a Storm Water Management Plan/Notice of Intent (NOI),
BMP operation and maintenance responsibilities and BMP inspection and
reporting.
26. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to
be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for
work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during
construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City
prior to commencement of work.
The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City.
3r/8
Resolution No.
Page 7
ASA-2006-06
July 11, 2006
27. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS
The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs
Department in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development.
28. TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING
The applicant shall review traffic signal timing for the North De Anza
Blvd.jMariani Avenue intersection with the objective of improving safety for
existing and expected pedestrian movements.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of July 2006, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll
call vote:
AYPS:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COlv1:M:ISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Marty Miller, Chairperson
Planning Commission
G: \ Planning\PDREPORT\ RES \ 2006 \ ASA-2006-06 res.doc
31q
TR-2006-09
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
MODEL RESOLUTION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TIIE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE TREE REMOVAL AND REPLANTING FOR
A PROPOSED 60,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING AND PARKING
STRUCTURE.
SECTION I: PROTECT DFSCRIPfION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
TR-2006-09
Cliff Chang
10495 N. De Anza Blvd.
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application
to remove and replace 21 trees; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the
Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held
one or more public hearings on this matter; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, application for Tree Removal is hereby recommended for
approval; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning
Application TR-2006-09, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission
Meeting of July 11, 2006 are incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. TREE REMOVAL
Approval is granted to remove 21 onsite crees as detailed in a plan set titled: II
Any Mountain Office Building II consisting of 13 sheets labeled: C, Al, A2, A2.1,
A2.2, A3, A-:l, Cl through C-5 and CLl and an arborist report titled: "Tree
Assessment and Recommendations for the Redevelopment Project Proposed at
3.-;;20
Model Resolution
Page 2
TR-2006-09
July 11, 2006
10495 North De Anza, Cupertino, California, /I prepared by Walter Levison and
dated 5/12/06, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this
Resolution. Approval is not granted to remove street trees in the public right-of-
way.
2. LANDSCAPE PLAN
The applicant shall submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be
reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to
issuance of building permits. The landscape plan shall include:
a) water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with
Chapter 14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures
referenced in Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed
Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code.
b) Four 48/1 box Arbutus Marina trees in lieu of the 24" box trees proposed.
c) Landscaping where feasible to soften the appearance of the westerly side of
the parking structure.
3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER
EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute
written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified
that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section
66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period
complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
4. TREE PROTECTION
Prior to the issuance of grading and demolition permits, the applicant shall enter
into a contract with an ISA-certified arborist to review and comment on all
construction drawings and monitor grading, demolition and building
construction to ensure that the recommendations described in an arborist report
titled: "Tree Assessment and Recommendations for the Redevelopment Project
Proposed at 10495 North De Anza, Cupertino, California, II prepared by Walter
Levison and dated 5/12/06. Applicant shall provide a copy of the contract to
the Director of Community Development.
The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified
arborist with a confirmation letter sent to the Director of Community
Development prior to issuance of grading and demolition permits. The
supervising arborist shall monitor construction activities and prepare a final
3"-~1
Model Resolution
Page 3
TR-2006-09
July 11, 2006
report ascertaining the health of the protected trees prior to issuance of final
occupancy.
5. TREE PROTECTION BOND
The applicant shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $100,000 to
ensure protection of the trees slated for preservation prior to issuance of grading,
demolition or building permits. The bond shall be returned after completion of
construction, subject to a letter from the City arborist indicating that the trees are
in good condition.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of July 2006, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABST AIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATIEST:
APPROVED:
Steve Piasecki
Director of Conununity Development
Marty Miller, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
G: \ Planning \ PDREPORT\ RES\ 2006 \ TR-2006-09 res.doc
3"~~
CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
June 14, 2006
As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council
of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project
was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on
June 14,2006.
PROTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
U-2006-06 (EA-2006-09), ASA-2006-06, TR-2006-09
Cliff Chang (Chang Architecture)
10495 N. De Anza Blvd
DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST
Use Permit to demolish an existing 27,000 square foot office building and construct a
60,000 square foot office building and parking structure
Architectural and Site review for a new 60,000 square foot office building and parking
structure
Tree removal and replanting for a proposed 60,000 square foot office building and
parking structure
FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and
has no si~cant environmental impacts.
; /
\
'L\
OJ
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
-.
g/ercjREC EA~2006-09
3~3
/,~,
(,i, %\,;;,
~~>~-
.~.
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3251
FAX (408) 777-3333
Community Development Department
CUPERJINO
, ' ., ' "l\l! rf"\l ,''': I \"';'(-';.,'\\l\)r~"dcll\i':\i""\' :;:.:y,;,l'" tl.;-; 1'~'\f'l "I l;"'l;'~"~'f~).' ',:'.:'.; -,~
.. '~~ L' ." .;.. p_,,:,.~~.)., .':E:,"\j;I"._-:,::;,t,:. .I"'-(<.~ h..l~:';t ~'::,t.~,~,~~~!"\;l:: ~r: \ .~f ~ ':it !.:;,.~~f ;,~,tlrc~.-~. ..~-'.-. ~~~'_i.'
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
EA File No: e A--z.c.Ob'- cA
ase File No,iF2tll)c..,- Df. I A&A--2t'..ob'-~
ttachments Tk2t,DI:', -0':;
r ,-
v
,DoO
~"? .p.f-.
c..o'\tl ("
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Site Area (ac.) -USZ Building Co~ge . 2"7..'7>/0 Exist. Buildi,nQ ~ 7,~9. Proposed . .
Bldg. -1:P,n(:/') s.f. Zone -~]'.P. Designation -ZI\c{(ltrrl(.~/ ~~C'IcJr/otf!a;~ R.e$;(,~~,
Assessor's Parcel No. -3"2,b- 33 -J.1.Q.
If Residential, Units/Gross Acre -
f5C"~ ~(.&
Total# Rental/Own Bdrms
Total s.f.
Price
Unit Type #1
Unit Type #2
Unit Type #3
Unit Type #4
Unit Type #5
Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check)
o Monta Vista Design Guidelines
o
S. De Anza Conceptual
~
N. De Anza Conceptual
o
S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual
o
Stevens Crk Blvd. Conceptual
o
Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape
If Non-Residential, Building Area - (;O:DOO s.f.
I
Employees/Shift - Parking Required 2- \ \
Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area -
FAR- J3 Max.
Parking Provided '2 t to
YES)( NO
o
g ~~tf
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
>0'" 0 c'"
C C c.-
-c CIS CIS 0 1U C
Cil\'lt; ClSCISt; ...
-u .cu -~ .cu u
ISSUES: ... 1;: ~ 1-u:=1iiO I- u: lG ol\'l
C ._ U)'-.i tJ)Q. U)_o. zo.
[and Supporting Information Sources] C) c E U)C -~ U) C E E
'0 .2>>- c>> I:>> :I:: 0 Q) .~-
...J .- :i u -
Q.U) tIJ C ...JtIJ
-
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
I a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a 0 0 0 'Bt
,
i scenic vista? [5,9,24,41,44] I
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, 0 0 0 ~
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
state scenic highway? [5,9,11,24,34.41,44] -
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual 0 0 0 -ytt I
character or quality of the site and its :
surroundings? [1,17.19.44]
d) Create a new source of substantial light or 0 0 0 2(
glare, which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area? [1,16,44]
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In .-
-
determining whether impacts to agricultural - ,
resources are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and
Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by
the California Dept. of Conservation as an
optional model to use in assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland. Would the ,
project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique 0 0 0 }t
Farmland. or Farmland of Statewide ,
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use? [5,7.39]
b) Conflict with existing zoning for 0 0 0 ~
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract? [5,7,23]
c) Involve other changes in the existing 0 0 0 ~
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland. to non-agricultural use? [5,7,39]
3~5
>>- 0 c'E
C'" c-
_c lIS co....
-lIS- .c ca III calll- 1.)
.!! u u u .c .- "- .cuu
ISSUES: ...q::! ~ii:...1io ~ii:ca o lIS
c_ (1).-'- tl)Q. II) - C. zc.
[and Supporting Information Sources] 'scE II) c ~.- "- II)cE E
o.~- Q)tD ~o G)~- -
...1- ::!!(J
D.m m c ...1m
-
pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means? [20,36,44]
d) Interfere substantially with the movement 0 0 0 JB...
of any native resident or migratory fish or
! wildlife species or with established native
! resident or migratory wildlife corridors. or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites? [5.10,12,21,26]
e) Conflict with any local policies or 0 0 0 Ja.
ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or -
ordinance? [11,12,41]
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted . .
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural 0 0 0 ~
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan? [5,10,26,27]
V. CUL rURAL RESOURCES .- Would the
project: -- "
--
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in 0 0 0 :J1(
the significance of a historical resource as
defined in ~15064.5? [5,13,41]
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in 0 0 0 Br I
the significance of an archaeological I
!
resource pursuant to ~ 15064.5? [5,13,41]
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique 0 0 0 pi
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature? [5,13,4 1]
d) Disturb any human remains, including 0 0 0 J't
those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
[1,5]
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the
project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential I
substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as 0 0 0 .8l
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zonina Map issued by the
3~ ;2fo
~... 0 1:'"
_c I:~ 1:.. C
-ea:'" ea: ea: 0 ea: ea:ea:'" 1:)
.!! CJ CJ ,cCJ.c.-1- ,cCJCJ
ISSUES: "'q::~ 1-q::...1io I--ea: o ea:
c_ U) .- i C') Co U)!!:: Q. zQ.
[and Supporting Information Sources] sce U)C -l- I/) C E E
o~- CD l:>> ~ 0 CI) .!?-
...J- :2:CJ -
a..m m I: -1m
-
of an existing or proposed school?
[2,29,30,40,44]
d) Be located on a site which is included on a 0 0 0 S-
list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
i 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the I
environment? [2,42,40,43]
e) For a project located within an airport land 0 0 0 ~
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area? [ ] .
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private 0 0 0 -R!(
airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the \
project area? [ ]
g) Impair implementation of or physically 0 0 0 .Iil
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan? [2,32,33,44]
h) Expose people or structures to a 0 0 0 ~
significant risk of loss, injury or death I
involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or I
where residences are intermixed with !
wildlands?[1,2,44]
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
- Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or 0 0 0 :B1
waste discharge requirements? [20,36,37]
b) Substantially deplete groundwater 0 0 0 .!J.
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level
(e.g., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing land uses
.or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)? [20,36,42]
3 r';2 '7
>0,'" 0 c-
C'" c-
-c mC 0'" C
-ftl'" ,cftl ftl ftlns1::) 1::)
.!!! C.) C.) C.) ,c .- ... ,c(,)
ISSUES: ... I;: a 1-1;: ~o I-I;:ftl o ftl
c._ 0-~m~ II) - c. zc.
[and Supporting Information Sources] CD C E en C ;:.- II)cE E
'0 S?- CDC) ::0 CD .2'-
..J- :EC.) -
Il.(/) (/) C ..J(/)
-
jurisdiction over the project (including, but
not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
[1,7,8,16,17,18,44]
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat 0 0 0 1\
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan? [1,5,6,9,26]
X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the
project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known 0 0 0 ~.
mineral resource that would be of value to ""
the region and the residents of the state?
[5,10]
b) Result in the loss of availability of a 0 0 0 )f
locally-important mineral resource recovery
site delineated on a local general plan,
specific plan or other land use plan? [5,10]
XI. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, 0 0 0 ~
noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
I agencies? [8,18,44]
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of 0 0 0 ~
excessive groundbome vibration or
groundbome noise levels? [8,18,44]
c) A substantial permanent increase in 0 0 0 ~
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project?
[8, 1 8]
d) A substantial temporary or periodic 0 0 0 ~
increase in ambient noise levels in the
.
project vicinity above levels existing without
the project? [8,18,44]
e) For a project located within an airport land 0 0 0 ~
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project
expose people residinq or working in the
3"'~
>>.. 0 c"
C" c-
-C 10; 0'5 c
-IOU IOlG" U
.!! u .c U.c .- I- .cuu
ISSUES: "I;:! I-I;:..ftlo I-l;:lG o 10
c_ (1).-.- CD~ (1)'- ~ z~
[and Supporting Information Sources] See (I) c 3=.- l- ll) C e e
0.2'- ell CD :t:: 0 Q) .~- -
..J- ;:eu
~rn U) c ..JU)
-
other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
[5,17,19,21,26,27,44]
b) Does the project include recreational 0 0 0 !q
facilities or require the construction or I
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment? [5,44]
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC-
Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is 0 0 1ii1 0
substantial in relation to the existing traffic
load and capacity of the street system (Le.,
result in a substantial increase in either the
number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)? [4,20,35,44]
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, 0 0 0 ~ I
a level of service standard established by the ;-
; "
county congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways? [4,20,44]
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, 0 0 0 . tJ
including either an increase in traffic levels or ;
a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks? [4.?] ,
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a 0 0 .0 '}l I
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
!
uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [20,35,44] i
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0 jlJ.
[2,19,32,33,44]
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 f2t 0
[17,44]
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or 0 0 0 )Xl
programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus tumouts, bicycle
racks)? [4,34]
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -
Would the project:
3~;2fj
a) Does the project have the potential to 0 0 0 fill
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
, range of a rare or endangered plant or
I animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or
prehistory? 0
b) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 Xl.
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects)?
[]
c) Does the project have environmental 0 0 0 ~
effects which will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly? []
I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding
accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate source references
when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. I
hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause
delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold
harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of
such delay or discontinuance.
Preparer's Signature
~~
~, d-
c,I.; U:rV:j
Print Preparer's Name
3 "'3D
yage 1 or 1
E \ ,"c.: r
' r - t ~ l.
( r\ I \{' V+- ,
, v, _c , . 7
Colin Jung
From: Larry Cannon [cdgplan@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, May 15, 20066:36 PM
To: Colin Jung
Subject: De Anza Blvd
Colin
Here are a few thoughts.
1. Having at entry at the De Anza I Mariani comer would be difficult for the internal leasing of the first
floor (e.g., corridors to the elevator lobby), but I think an entry to De Anza should be added. Note that
on my diagram, I placed only modest lobbies at each side - I also widened the corridor in front of the
elevators (it seems rather too small now)
2. The major thrust of what I showed was to increase the amount of solid wall area and give the building
a largely horizontal format which is common along the Boulevard. I'm not sure what materials are
proposed - it appears to be brick and some other solid material. What material to use where is something
that should be looked at after the architect makes some changes.
3. Deep setting the ground floor windows and adding some columns would give the building more of a
base.
4. Intensifying the use of projecting eyebrows would also add more of a horizontal form to the building,
and relate lower floors to the strong eyebrow proposed at the very top.
5. Some vertical window elements would help to provide visual balance to the design.
6. The garage circulation (auto and pedestrian) seems to have some issues as noted on the diagram.
That's it for now - let me know if I can do anything else.
6/7/2006
3'31
r..~,:,"':""'-~:~~-_~~~.-l
.. "la-r ,. .~. ..
,
'a II II II I ..
"1 P~oeCK
.
III 110 .
1 ,,-~
. .
,
~.., j. II . II II
,
,
1
:0" II II III ill
1 . ...-....
," ,. ...
IE. . M \S."),v )[i.$1
I .' .._"."
Ln___ .- n _'_..~_
_.:____ . r_r. ',_.! . . . . ..:... _."~"_:'.-=
Unclear how this stair Is accessed
GARAGE
UPPER
lEVEl,
_1It1lfN(.(tJ
MAI'UANI"veNUE-
-...1:/
, -- .
._"~T.: ---- <- -~:- 0.~~:- ..~~=~_~. ~~
'. _.- ,
-.....
-.....
"'-.:/
I . +~.
,
,. Awkward access to entry ~-~~-_~----:-;--~-_--_::.~.
'--; ConsIder trlan walkwa :1" ... -.:I'...:.. ..--- ,--.-----... "
j ',"'1 n.... .". ~'~.~.u.:'r- ".r ."... "... ;11
~. ~ - <I I' <I , <I ,
teE Do II III . II. . .. p_
I ~v
: .
. I o.
.-'
0< . .~
------------------------- - ----- -~~
.
.
..
.
.
, ~~'..~-
-"
.~;rr
I,,.}.:["
~.~--
. Add entry
from De Anza Blvd.
In ...
o
::;
III ..
;5
~
~w
.-0-
~
~
lEI
~
e.;
~
:
-.
-
--
I
- '--1Ir
........-......~
a a ..,..~: - a a ... .
. "
... .r ...
~,pc;t III" l r"-;"-7r--: ....
~ ~ I~- ~ .
:.: : I ~.... ~
~ ~__..'..T. ,I.; , ,.
,i _'!o:1 : _ !'"""""""
I . L I ~
-L' l.... . .. ,,./ . ~ .' '....... . -. J"~. - .
___....___!o_---... _..,~.o....--+-~..........-I;L....,..--.~'-~-~-.__--
",_.' ,"_.__._ 4 ...,........~'~:..~..- ,;;..;."" .' ~~ .... ".', _" '. ". '.. .;.','.
~..._--_._-------~-.~~
..
"
-u%.
j..
,
, I
~
'IIL~O$
. ~~
.:
.,
.
- II- II
. .
.
.
-'-"""
,~
. I ~. .
'. i :~. J";'
:. . .... ~'.. . ~ - '. '. . .
. _~_.......... --'.....,:...r...!.-...........,-IfCo-...:..-~_.. ~_..
,.. .__ - , ~. . ,...... I ~ ~
" '" "!~. -,. ~. ~ .. ". ....
GARAGE
GROUND
LEVEL
This seems awkward.
When one gets to end,
there is no option but to
go up the ramp
Consider eliminating spaces
to allow turn as indicated by
the red arrow
GROUND LEVEL
FLOOR PLAN
Continue solid wall theme at all spandrels
except for occasional vertical wall glass emphasis .... - .. i
Continue window eyebrows :
I
I
I
I
I
, I
. ~----______I
Add columns and
deep set windows
on ground floor
Add entry
DE ANZA BLVD.
ELEVATION
Comments and Suggested Changes
10495 DE ANZA BLVD
Cupertino
CANNON DESIGN GROUP
May 15, 2006
3-3~
E.'i\.<\ bd- ~ B
~}b Walter Levison
r CONSULTING ARBORIST
,'\.
~}A
. ~';'~ ~.-,:-::,::';.~'..'.:,':::..-
ASCA Reaistered Consultina Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #ANc-3172
Tree assessment and recommendations for
the redevelopment project proposed at
10495 North de Anza
Cupertino, California
Prepared for:
Sand Hill Prope~ Company
30 East 4 8t.
San Mateo, CA
Site Visits:
Walter Levison
1/28/06, 2/9/06, 5/8/06
Report:
Walter Levison
5/12/06
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12106
PhoneIFax (650) 691-0990
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member IX the International SocIety of Arboriculture
1 of 31
'j--3il'
~jh Walter Levison
rl CONSULTING ARBOR1ST
~\
.~~_."-I". "'" .r..
. -.~ p. -....... ......~_.~,..
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist tfWG-3172
Table of Contents
Page
3
3
4
9
15
16
17
18
19
27
28
Section
1.0 Assignment ________~_~~
2.0 Protected Trees
3.0 Observations and Discussion
4.0 Recommendations
5~0 Consultant's Qualifications
6.0 Tree Vendors
7.0 Assumptions and limiting Conditions
8.0 Certification
9.0 Tree Charts
10.0 Tree Map (use scale bar to scale off this sheet)
11.0 Photographs
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, CUpertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved.
Version 5/12/06
PhonelFax (650) 697-D990
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting ArboIists and Member ct the Intemallonal Society of Arboriculture
2 of 31
3--35
~h Walter Levison
7' CONSULTING ARBORIST
,~
~~~
A';':: ';:.-~:'::. ~ -....~~...;_.:..:....
ASCA R istered Consulti Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #VIJC-3172
1.0 Assignment
I was requested by Sand Hill Property Company of San Mateo. CalifornIa to assess alf
existing trees measuring 4-inches diameter and greater located at 10495 North de Anza
in Cupertino, California, and prepare a written arborist report detailing the health and
structural condition of the trees in both data chart and paragraph format. Trees
measuring less than 4-inches diameter were not assessed.
The purpose of this report is to provide project team members with documentation which
will help determine the preservation suitability and impact mitigation possibilities for site
trees. This information is based on the author's field assessment of the trees' health and
structural attributes.
The goal of this report is to retain tree(s) in good condition that will complement the
proposed site plan and landscape plan and are not in direct conflict with proposed site
plan activity footprints.
All trees noted in this report were tagged with aluminum tags numbering ~1" through "58"
at 5-7 feet above grade by the author, and are noted on the tree location map scan in this
report.
I recorded numerous field notes during my various site visits. This information on site
trees is compiled in the tree charts below, and expanded with further detail in the
observations and discussion section of the report.
Tree diameter was measured using a forester's D-tape which converts circumference to
diameter inches and tenths of inches. Tree height was determined either by visual
estimation or by using a tangent tree height gauge. Canopy diameter was measured
using a tape measure, or in some cases, paced off.
Recommendations for various actions are outlined in the recommendations section.
Photographs of site trees are located at the end of this report.
2.0 Protected Trees
The City of Cupertino. California regulates the removal of the following privately-owned
trees as .specimen trees-:
. Oaks, California buckeyes measuring 10 inches or greater (single trunk) or 20
inches or greater (multi trunk) at 4.5-feet above grade.
. Big leaf maples measuring 12 inches or greater (single trunk) or 25 Inches or
greater (multi trunk) at 4.5-feet above grade.
. Deodar cedars and blue atlas cedars measuring 12 inches or greater (single
trunk) or 25 inches or greater (multi trunk) at 4.5-feet above grade.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino Version 5/12/06
Walter Levison @A11 Rights ReselVed PhonelFax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member. Amerlcan SocIety of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International SocIety of Arboriculture
3 of 31
B.-3tc
~}h Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBORIST
~~
.-"'';"' ~' ':>:....>..A..:....:.:.:..,"..
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist 'iNlG-3172
A City of Cupertino tree removal permit is required before any .specimen tree. can be
removed.
Deodar cedars #1 and #2 are "specimen trees. as per the above City of Cupertino
definition.
3.0 Observations and Discussion
a) Site Overview: An existing building is situated on the east side of the property,
and is proposed to be demolished. A new office building is proposed to be
constructed in approximately the same location as the existing structure, and will
accommodate retention of most of the canopy dripline of heritage cedar #2 and coast
redwood #5. A number of smaller coast redwoods are scattered throughout this
eastern portion of the site, and appear to be located such that they can be retained if
proper chain link tree protection fencing, wood chip mulching, and temporary
irrigation measures are installed.
Heritage cedar #1, alder #6, Iiquidambars #36 and #39, and coast redwoods #37 and
#38 are to be removed due to building footprint conflicts, and parking
reconfigurations.
A large number of ash trees which appear to be Fraxinus 'Modesto' (tree #11
through tree #27) are located just south of the southern border of the property (see
map) approximately 4-6 linear feet south of the existing wooden fence. These trees
are being negatively affected by foliar anthracnose which causes symptoms such as
leaf bum and deformation. Trees #11 through #18 are being heavily irrigated by the
neighboring property irrigation system (good), and have extensive surface rooting in
the southerly direction toward turfgrass and other landscaping (see photos).
Trees #19 through #27 are parking lot trees that extend out over the parking stalls
both on the neighboring property to the south and northward (see photos). The trees
appear to be owned by the neighbor, as the trunk locations are actually south of the
existing site plan area. Some of the trees may be impacted by the proposed ramp
installation.
Coast redwoods #28 through #32 are located alongside the existing acupuncture
office building that is outside the proposed site plan area, and can be retained as
long as no impacts occur other than scarification and resurfacing of the existing
asphalt parking lot
Coast redwoods #33 through #42 and #47 through #50 are located within the
existing parking lot of 10495 North de Anza, and are to be demolished to
accommodate a proposed parking structure.
Border coast redwoods #43 through #46. #51, #57, and #58 on the northmost edge
of the site are to be retained.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
Phone/Fax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, AmBl'lcan Society of Consulting ArbotIsts and Member of the International SocIety of Arboriculture
4 of 31
8-3'7
~j~ Walter Levison
r CONSULTING ARBORIST
~\
...... ..~'.'.', .....,.~
,'__.C" .._......._._...
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified ArOOrist #I/IIC-3172
Coast redwoods #54, 55, and #56 are to be removed to to their close proximity to the
proposed building footprint
Side Note: Overview of Coast Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens)
Redwoods are not native to the Santa Clara Valley, but rather to the fog belt area
such as the Santa Cruz Mountains just west of the site location. In natural settings,
the trees become drought stressed unless soil moisture is supplemented with
summer fog. (US Forest Service Tree Database).
Barrie Coate, the contract city arborist for the City of Cupertino, prepared an article in
2001 (Western Arborist 27:3) entitled .Can We Afford Our Coast Redwoods?R in
which the water requirements of this species were made apparent: Mcoast redwood
trees require more water than most other trees to remain healthy...20 gallons of
water per 1-inch of trunk diameter (oSH) on a monthly basis, year round..
Mr. Coate discusses the tree's attributes such as an extremely fast growth rate (up to
5 feet per year), and an ever increasing water demand year after year as the tree
outgrows its planting space and becomes drought stressed when trunk diameter
surpasses 18-inches unless given the proper volumes of water as noted above.
According to this article, we should be wary of utilizing such a large tree in areas
where the site space is too narrow to support the growth of a very large canopy, and
sites where irrigation cannot be adequately managed to account for ever increasing
(and expensive) water use as the tree increases in size.
The US Forest Service database confinns a very fast growth rate for this species.
After they are 4-10 years of age, coast redwoods can grow up to 6-feet or more per
year (USFS).
Radial trunk growth rate of this species differs from site to site. In the Cupertino area,
I would expect irrigated trees the size of specimens #3 and #4 to be about 15-20
years old. The author assumes tree #5 was planted in approximately 1973 (the
assumed year the existing building was constructed), making this 47 -inch diameter
specimen only 33 years old. In terms of their 100o-year plus potential lifespan in
natural settings, these trees are relative newborns or teenagers. Yet, in irrigated
landscape settings such as golf courses, we would expect to see a lifespan of maybe
100 years (Coate, 2005, Westem Arborist).
b) !mPacts and Protection Issues:
Heritage Cedars #1 and #2
Cedar #1 is in direct conflict with the proposed site plan, and is currenUy planned for
removal. It is a large specimen in fair condition (see data above).
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
PhoneIFax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
5of31
3.-36
~lh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBORIST
,\~
~~
"'-_.._......... .,""M
. .,", .-" ..._.~_....
ASCA Reaistered Consultina Arborist #401
ISA Certified ArOOrist #WG-3172
The tree has been ~lion-tailed~: a form of pruning that does not conform to ANSI-
A300 U.S. pruning standards and strips the inner foliage out of the tree. The result is
that radial growth of limbs is stunted except for the end portions of the limbs where
remaining foliage photosynthesizes and causes growth, excessive end-weight, and a
disproportionate increase in limb girth.
This tree has one very large diameter limb arising at 4.5-feet above grade which
bends vertically to become a large (25% or so) portion of the total canopy. Normally,
limbs of this size in relation to the parent stem are removed to reduce the potential
for a trunk splitout, but in this case removal of the limb would remove too large a
percentage of the remaining live canopy.
It appears the apical merlstem (uppermost vertical growth stem) may have been
pruned out, though this was not confirmed. If so, this would constitute topping, and
will downgrade the structural rating further than that noted.
Cedar #1 root elongation and expansion is causing significant asphalt cracking and
heaving out to 15-linear feet from the trunk edge. The elevations of woody structural
roots are not known, as most of the root system is located below existing parking lot
asphalt.
Cedar #2 is a large deodar cedar specimen also in fair condition (see charts above).
Tree #2 basically exhibits the same canopy size, structure, and health and structural
attributes as tree #1. In this case, a large 20-inch diameter limb arises at
approximately breast height. extends horizontally for some length. and bands
vertically to comprise 20-30% of the total live canopy of the tree. The tree has been
lion-tailed to remove inner foliage throughout the canopy. Limbs of this size in
relation to the main stem are typically removed to avoid a structural failure, though
again, in this case, removal of the limb would result in too large a percentage of the
live canopy being removed.
The mainstem does fork into two codominant stems at approximately 35-feet above
grade. These two stems appear to be somewhat fused together, though through-bolt
bracing might be a prudent maintenance option that would reduce the likelihood of
thIs very narrow crotch splitting apart. An arborist can evaluate this situation further
through use of a bucket truck.
Heritage deodar cedar #2 will be retained using a chain link tree protection fence that
will be approximately 22-feet in radius, allowing for creation of construction corridors
of 3-5 feet in width between the proposed building footprint and the chain link
fencing.
The critical root zone for this tree is 3D-feet of radial protection with no impacts such
as digging or trenching into the existing subgrade (see item 'e' below). In my
experience on Bay Area projects throughout the past 8 years, it is almost impossible
to attain the CRZ distances as noted in Matheny, and partial CRZ chain link
protection is adequate in most cases as long as impacts such as landscaping, drain
line trenching, and irrigation trenching are rerouted to outside the fenced off areas.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
PhonelFax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting AIborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
6 of 31
3-3q
~jh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBORIST
,\\
~~
~... b_"'.'. '." .. ,". . ~
. -."r ,....' """"0-'-
ASCA R istered Consultino Arborist #401
ISA Certified ArOOrist #WC.3172
Tree #2 preservation will require special demolition specifications in addition to the
standard fencing, mulching, fertilization, and temporary irrigation measures, given
that it has existing concrete curb and asphalt parking lot surface materials inside the
dripline that are presumably to be demolished. Demolition of these materials within
the dripline can be phased to the very end of the site plan project so that root zone
desiccation and other negative impacts are minimized or eliminated during
construction _
Redwoods #3, #4, and #5
These three trees may have been drought stressed for some time, as the property
has been vacant and recently sold, indicating a potential for the irrigation system to
have been shut down for possibly one year or more (not confirmed). Given the trend
toward drought tolerant trees and water wise landscaping (East Bay Municipal Utility
District landscaping pubfications, etc.) it may be prudent to reduce the number of
redwoods at this site for water conservation purposes.
None of these three coast redwood trees are considered "specimen trees. by
Cupertino definition (see City of Cupertino website).
None of the three redwoods are transplantable in my opinion. Tree #3 is in fair
condition and is located near a landscape swate which would allow for a quick move,
though the tree appears drought stressed with poor to moderate twig density and
sparse branching. Tree #4 is in good overall condition, but has the problem of a
potentially deflected root system (personal observation) which could result in
structural instability and hazard if transplanted. Also, the trunk diameter is CNer 20-
inches at 4.5-feet above grade, potentially making it too large to successfully move
(personal communication, Tree Movers of Mountain View, 219/(6). Tree #5 is far too
large in diameter to move. The tree is in fair overall condition (see above charts).
Fortunately, tree brokers such as the local Tree Movers of Mountain View have
specimen redwoods and hundreds of other species on site available. A check of their
website on 1/19/06 revealed a number of large size coast redwoods available
ranging from 20 to 28-feet in height. most of which are already contained in 48-inch
diameter box wood containers and ready to ship from Mountain View
(www.treemovers.com). These large trees range from 6" to 9" trunk diameter.
After only a 1-2 year estabfishment period, these trees should perfonn with very fast
growth if coast redwoods are to be required as the mitigation planting "conditions of
approval. for this site plan project. Due to its very heavy irrigation requirement and
large landscape space requirement, other species should be used for new
landscaping at this site.
Other Redwoods
Redwoods in the east portion of the site (trees #3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10) can be protected
using chain link tree protection fencing, trunk buffers, wood chip mulching, temporary
irrigation. and possibly fertilization.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12106
PhonelFax(650)697~90
Registered Member, American SocIety of Consulllng ArborIsts and Member of the International SocIety of Arboriculture
7 of 31
3.40
~j" Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBORIST
.\\
~~.~
.......... ...... f. ".,.~
, . .. ,'.", ...~... oc._"
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #WC-3172
Other redwoods to be retained on the north side of the site can be protected using
chain link fencing and trunk buffers as applicable (trees #43, 44, 45, 46, 51, and
#58). Tree #58 will need special demolition specifications due to the existing curb
and parking lot materials that will be removed from near the trunk edge (see photos).
Redwood #9 in the southwest comer of the site is probably receiving some irrigation
from the neighbor's landscaping to the south, and from a water leak that was present
during my site survey in May, 2006. These water sources may help mitigate root loss
during oonstruction.
Ash Trees
Trees #11 through #18 are going to be irrigated continuously by the neighbor's
property landscape irrigation system. This irrigation may partially mitigate damages
to the trees' root systems that is expected to occur on the north side of the trunks
during site plan development at 10495 North de Anza at possibly only a few feet
north of the existing wood fenceline. Fencing off of the root systems at 4-6 feet north
of the existing property fenceline would mitigate some root damages, though the
linear distance of root retention typically required under industry standard of care is
usually greater than the +}- 8-10 linear feet of root system that could possibly be
retained on the north sides of the trees.
Ash trees #19 through #24 appear to be potentially impacted by parking structure
ramp work in the southwest quadrant of the property (see map). However, the
neighboring site parking lot grade in which the trees are planted is slightty higher
than the 10495 North de Anza parking lot grade. Therefore, the root systems of
these trees may actually be preserved during ramp construction north of the trees
(not confirmed).
c) Critical Root Zones (CRZ)~ As calculated using Matheny and Clark's Trees and
Develooment, coast redwood #5 has a CRZ of about 31..Jinear feet out from trunk
which would be required to be protected as a -no dig zonew. Given that the existing
building is no more than approximately 15-feet out from the trunk edge of the tree,
there is probably no possibility of the root system extending beyond that linear
distance out from trunk. Therefore, the tree should be protected with chain link
fencing at about 14-15 feet out from trunk in a full perimeter that will be +}- 3D-feet in
total diameter. On an unrelated note, this distance is well beyond the required
minimum root plate radius to avoid soil shear failure as per Mattheck.'s The Bocly
Language of Trees.
d) Utility Impacts: A utility plan has not yet been reviewed by the author. Therefore, I
cannot comment on potential root loss from utility trenches. Use of a joint trench or
. Jr to bundle multiple utilities Into a single trench outside the chain link tree
protection zones will help minimize impacts to site trees being retained.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12106
PhonelFax(650)697~90
RegIstered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborls1s and Member of the International SocIety of Arboriculture
8 of 31
341
f 1Y~!~~J:N!--~~i~~R
,\\
~\.
.... _~ .... .1"'"
- . " ,". - ..~_..--,' .
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified ArOOrist #WC-3172
A lighting plan was also not reviewed as part of this assignment. The use of
landscape lighting (if any) involves either 11 OV or low voltage wires or both. Conduits
for 110V systems are buried at depths between 18" below grade and 6" BG,
depending on whether one goes with rigid steel conduit or PVC conduit (personal
communication, two separate landscape electrical contractors, 3/06).
The rigid material can be buried at only 6" BG spec depth, which allows for better
tree root retention, given that most trees in the Bay Area clay soils root mainly in the
uppermost 18-inches of the soil profile, with greatest concentration in the upper 12-
inches between zero and 12-inches below grade. Low voltage systems can be buried
at between :z;ero and 6-inches below grade, depending on the intensity of site traffic.
On low traffic residential sites, low voltage wires can be buried at just below grade or
below a layer or wood chips or other mulch. allowing for almost 100% tree root
preservation.
The author recommends use of this rigid conduit or low voltage lighting wiring
systems only in.order to minimize trenching depths.
e) LandscaQing and Irrigation Trenchingjmpacts:
Installation of PVC and other irrigation lines (trenching) during new landscape
development is often the single most damaging item to existing trees out of all the
impacts in a site plan project.
The author has not reviewed a landscape plan or irrigation plan for this site.
Therefore, the impacts are unknown at the time of writing.
4.0 Recommendations
The following shall be included in the final stamped building set of plans as applicable:
1. Items to be completed before demolition and grading are initiated at this site:
a) PROJECT ARBORlST: Owner shall retain an ASCA registered consulting
arborist or an ISA certified arborist to act as the official "project arborist",
overseeing initial implementation of the tree protection and maintenance
recommendations for the pre-demolition period, and providing on-going
monitoring of irrigation, tree protection. and other items noted in the
recommendations section of the arborist report.
b) GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 1 UTILITY PLAN 1 LANDSCAPE PL4.N /
IRRIGATION PLAN 1 LIGHTING PLAN / DOWNSPOUT DRAIN LINE
REVIEW: The Project Arborist shall be given access to the above proposed
conceptual plan sheets for review as applicable before the project plan set is
finalized or approved by the City of Cupertino.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ AU Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
Phone/Fax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborlsts and Member of the International Society of ArborIcunure
9 of 31
3-1:;
~h Walter Levison
rl CONSULTING ARBORIST
,~~
A..~ ~
........ ,. ........~ '"., ~
. .. " ...,.- I>-~.~ .",,"_,
ASCA R istered Consultin Arbonst #401
ISA Certified Arborist #WC-3172
. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING ROUTES (if applicable): Keep all wiring
conduits at least 15-20 linear feet out from the trunk edge of any
tree being retained on site unless approved by the Project
Arbonst. A1tematively, use only "direct burial~ low voltage type
wiring placed on or no deeper than 3-inches below existing
grades within driplines of trees baing retained.
. LANDSCAPE PLAN: If the areas inside the TPZs absolutely
must be landscaped (not recommended), the Project Arborist
shall work with the project landscape architect to minimize
irrigation and planting development within the dripJines of trees
being retained on site, especially cedar #2 and redwoods #3, 4,
5, 9. and #10 along the North de Anza side of the site.
e) TPZ FENCE: Install 6-foot high chain link fencing on 8-foot high 2" diameter
iron tube posts driven 24-inches into the ground at locations noted below.
Posts must be mounted no farther than 6-feet on center. The areas inside
these zones shall be known as Tree Protection Zones (TPZ) or root
protection zones (RPZ):
A small 12-wide gap or "door" should be left open in each fencing perimeter
so that the Project Arborist and tree care company personnel can enter the
TPZs without ripping the fencing down.
Tree t
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11 through
18
19 through
27
28 'through
32
43 through
46
51
57 and 58
Radial distance from fence
to tree trunk e.
22~ft on aU sides
1 ~20 ft on aI sides
1~ft nOJth and east sides, 1().ft west side,
and a few feet on the south side
14-ft or more on all sides
1 Q.; all sides
1o..ft. all sides
1 ~ft out aIo north side
1 ().feet out aI north side
Create a single route of fencing at 3-5 linear
feet north of the existing southern property
bound fencellne, if ble.
(Can use trunk buffers or chain link fencing).
(Can use trunk buffers or chaln link fencing).
Fencing locations to be detennined on site by
Pro' Arborist and conlractor team.
Fencing locations to be determined on site by
P' Arborist and contractor team.
Initially fence out on the existing asphalt at
1~feet out from trunk usin moveable
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12106
PhoneIFax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, American SocIety of Consulting ArbOrists and Member of the International Society of Artlorlculture
10 of 31
3-f3
~lh Walter Levison
rl CONSULTING ARBORIST
,\~
~~~
~~... ~AI.". ".." h . ~
. .... p. c~u -"__ ..~.'
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arbonst #WC-3172
concrete fence footings. Then move fencing
during final phase of demolition at end of
project. Or simply instaU trunk buffers as per
item 'h' below.
d) SILT FENCE: Install TENAX silt fencing as per package directions along the
outsides of the chain link fencing TPZS. This material is a 100-foot long roll
of silt fencing with built in wood stakes that is available at home improvement
stores for about $30. Affix the upper edge of the silt fencing to the chain link
using W resistant zipties or wires.
e) SIGNS: Affix signage to each 10-Iinear feet of TPZ chain link, to be
comprised of a waterproof 8X11 sign stating "Tree Protection Fence: Do Not
Move or Remove. Call Project Arborist at XXX-XXX~XXXX'".
1) WOOD CHIPS: Lay a 4-inch thick layer of wood chipper type wood chips
(not bark chips or shredded redwood bark). available from any tree care
company for free. inside the tree protection zones established as the areas
inside the tree protection chain link fences. Pull chips out at least two linear
feet from the edge of any tree trunk.
g) FERTILIZATION: Fertilize the areas inside the TPZs of trees #2, 3.4.5. 9,
and #10 via soil injection using a high quality slow release tree fertilizer such
as "Doggett InjectoFeed 32-7-7 Tree Fertilizer" with >50% WIN. humates,
and zeolites (or equivalent). If possible. also fertilize tree #58.
Document with a receipt from a qualified tree care company (see vendor list
below).
h) TRUNK BUFFERS I SELF-STANDING FENCE: Install trunk buffers around
trees in close proximity to site plan construction elements. thIs includes
trees #2. 19,20,21,22,23,28,29.30,31,32.57, and #58. Trunk buffers
shall consist of the following:
. Wrap the lower trunk of each tree with at least 5-10 layers of
orange plastic snow fencing so that a buffer of plastic 2-inches
thick is created over the trunk between grade and at least 8-feet
above grade.
. Stand 2X4X8-ft boards vertically, side by side, to create a solid
wall of wood around the entire circumference of each tree. A
second person must hold this wood in place so that step C can
be performed.
. While one person holds the wood, a second person continues
wrapping orange plastic snow fencing over the boards to secure
the buffer in place. Wrap duct tape or rope over the outside
during this step only, in order to secure the materials.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
Phone/Fax (650) 697..()990
Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
11 of 31
3-11
~jll Walter Levison
rl CONSULTING ARBORIST
,'\.
~~ )...
. "^"';: .;,:-~~:,~ ~,,:,:~~~:..
ASCA Registered Consultina Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #WC-3172
Sea correctly installed trunk buffer in photograph below.
Alternative to Trunk Buffers: Erect chain link fencing panels erected on
concrete block footings wired together such that a moveable wall of metal is
created to block. construction activity from impacting the above noted trees.
Trees #2. #57, and #58, however, must be provided with trunk buffers
as per the above specifications.
i) TREE REMOVALS: Remove trees in conflict with the site plan construction
footprints after acquiring a valid city tree removal permit. These include trees
#1,6,33,34,35,36.37,38,39,40,41.42.47,48,49,50.52,53, 54, 55,
and #56.
Tree #1 is a specimen tree. All other trees are non-specimen trees as per
Cupertino definition.
j) PRUNING: Retain an ISA certified arbonst to perform pruning and/or other
tree maintenance as needed, such as the optional through-bolt bracing
suggested for the crotch at 35-feet above grade in cedar #2 (see list of
vendors below).
As with other types of contracting, multiple bids and multiple opinions from
arborists are encouraged to give a broad based view of the health and
structural maintenance situation with each tree specimen.
2. Items to be completed during the period between the commencement of
demolition and grubbing, and the final occupancy signoff, as per direction
from the Project ArborIst:
a) PROJECT ARBORIST shall monitor site construction on a monthly basis as
to ensure that tree protection measures are being adhered to as applicable
(scope of duties: to be determined).
b) MITIGATION FOR TREE REMOVALS: Mitigation for trees being removed
shall be determined by the City of Cupertino planning department and/or
planning commissil?" as applicable.
c) PARKING LOT ASPHALT SCARIFICATION: If possible. all existing parking
lot areas that are to remain as~is as reconfigured parkin,g stalls shall be
scarified and resurfaced without cutting into the existing baserock base
section (ex. along redwoods #28, 29, 30, 31, and #32).
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12106
Phone/F~ (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, American SocIety of Consulting Arborlsts and Member of the International Society of Arborlculture
12 of 31
l--
3.45
~lh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBORIST
,\\
~~
....~ ":,P ;>~:,"~~:_':,,:,."..
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #WC-3172
d) PHASING OF DEMOLITION:
i. All demolition of existing MC and curb materials within 25-feet of
trees #2 and #58 shall occur only at the verv end of the site olan
oroiect, such that negative impacts to the root systems of these
trees are minimized.
ii. Contractor team shall notify Project Arborist 48-hours prior to the
above demolition activity so that he/she can monitor the process and
advise construction personnel on root pruning, irrigation, mulching,
and any other tree care related activity deemed necessary to
maintain the trees in their current state of health.
e) NC & CURB DEMOLITION SPECIFICATIONS FOR TREES #2 AND #58:
i. Initial surfacing removal: With Project Arborist present. move chain
link fencing panels and commence demolition (with trunk buffers in
place on trees #2 and #58). Hand jackhammer pieces of asphalt out
around the two trees, pulling these pieces laterally out (westward)
using only the teeth of a backhoe machine small enough to fit the
top of the boom beneath the lowest branches of cedar #2.
ii. Machinery Restriction: Do not allow any trucks, machinery, or other
vehicles to encroach onto the open soil root zone where asphalt and
other materials have just been removed. Keep all machinery and
vehicles to the west of the trees such that the surfacing removal
work is performed in reverse with the backhoe pulling westward and
a dump truck located west of the backhoe.
lii. Place a layer of coarse wood chips 4-inches thick over the newly
open soil root zone of the two trees under the Project Arborisfs
direction. Use only hand wheelbarrows and hand shovels to perform
this task.
iv. Irrigate immediately (same day) using garden hoses, water tnlck,
tow-behind tank. soaker hoses, etc. as per direction by Project
Arborist.
f) IRRIGATION: Initiate soaker hose, water tnlck, or portable tow-behind water
tank irrigation at or before commencement of grubbing and demolition as
requested by the Project Arborisl Initial and subsequent appJication rates to
be detennlned by Project Arborist using a Lincoln soil moisture meter to
probe soil within the TPZs on a monthly basis.
Typical application involves slowfy spraying 100-300 gallons of water over
the TPZ wood chips around each tree. once every 2-4 weeks during dry
months or during months when soli moisture probe readings are lower than
normal. continuing until the first significant rains of winter.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12106
PhoneiFax(650)697~990
Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arborlsts end Member of the IntematiOnaI Society of ArtJoriculture
13 of 31
3'~
~jh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBORIST
.\~
~~
&~'_ o<"-~':'~: '~<c',+-' .:.. ~
ASCA R istered ConsulUn Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist WVc-3172
Contractor shall maintain a written "water log" at the site construction trailer,
detailing dates, tree numbers, and volume or duration of application. Project
Amorist shall be given access to this log upon request.
g) PRUNING: All pruning to clear the airspace of the proposed office building
and any associated landscape features or structures must be performed only
by or under the direct supervision of an ISA-Certified Arborist, and must
conform to the latest version of "ANSI A300 for tree care operations- tree,
shrub, and other woody plant maintenance- standard practices" (see vendor
list below).
h) ROOT SEVERING: Any roots measuring >1-inch diameter encountered
during work within 1~inear feet of a tree being retained on site must be
severed at right angles to the root growth direction using sharp tools such as
an Ale powered Sawzall, electrician's cable cutter, professional pruning
shears, chain saw, or professional lapper. Root bark must not be tom. Root
tissue must not be shattered back into the area behind the root cut.
Immediately (same day) backfill around the roots using parent soil, or cover
cut ends with multiple layers of wet, muddy burlap fabric if possible. Keep
soil surface at grade well irrigated or as directed from the Project Arborist.
Project Arborist shall document all incidences with digital photographs when
provided vvith notice of root pruning from construction personnel.
i) OSHA LA YBACK CUT: No OSHA 45-degree layback cuts shall be allowed
within the TPZ of any protected size tree being retained at this site.
j) TRENCHING: All downspouts, area or French drainlines, landscape
irrigation tines, elecbical wires, utilities, and any other below grade items
proposed for this project must be routed to outside of the TPZs with no
exceotions unless authorized in writing by the Project Arborist.
J When applicable, existing utilities shall be "joint trenched" or otherwise
bundled in such a way that new utility trenching within 25-linear feet of
existing trees being retained is either eliminated or minimized.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12106
PhonelFax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member. American Society of Consulling Arborists and Member of the International Society of ArboTiculture
14 of 31
3-tf?
~}h Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBOR 1ST
.\~
~.~
-c
,\:
.~ ~_..'." "' ,<,~
. "" ". .... ...~_.'.,..
ASCA Reoistered Consultina Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #WG-3172
5.0 Consultant's Qualifications
a Millbrae Community Preservation Commission and Tree Board
11/0 1-present
o ASCA Registered Consulting Arbarist #401
a ISA Certified Arborist #WC~3172
a B.A. Environmental Studies/Soil and Water Resources
UC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, Callfomia 1990
a Peace Corps Soil and Water Conservation Extension Agent
Chiangmai Province. Thailand 1991-1993
a Associate Consulting Arborist
Barrie D. Coate and Associates
4/99-8199
a Contract City Arborist to the City of Belmont, California
6199-present
a American Society of Consulting Arborists (ASCA) Consulting Academy Graduate Class of
2000
[J Continued education through attendance of arboriculture lectures and forums sponsored by
the Intemational Society of Arboriculture (Westem Chapter) and the American Society of
Consulting Arborists
(Full curriculum vitae available upon request)
Site Address: 10495 NorUl de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
PhoneIFax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member r;;J the Intemallonat Society of Arboricultur&
15 of 31
8 "'16
~}h Walter Levison
rl CONSULTING ARBORIST
.\\.
~\..
~....... .",. ~::c',- a-...-.... ',;:. "'~'
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #WC-3172
6.0 Tree Vendors
Tree Moving Services:
Joe Omaz Trees of California P.O. Box 13189 (408) 264-3663
-trees moved by hand only ,CA 95013
Mr. John Service @ Valley Crest 8501 Calaveras Road (925) 862-2485
Sunol, CA 94586
Tree Movers of Mountain View
-can transplant. acquire, ship. and install trees (650) 968-6117
-trees moved by mechanical ~e onlv. -trees must normally be <12"DBH
Sources of Replacement Trees:
Hecker Pass Specimen Trees Hecker Pass Road (408) 842-2121
Mr. BRI Miller ~CA95020
Pacific Nurseries-wholesale only 2099 Hillside Blvd. (650) 755-2330
CoIma. CA 94014
Valley Crest Tree Company 8501 Calaveras Road (925) 862.2485
Sunol CA 94586
East Bay Nwsery 2332 San Pablo Ave. (510) 845-6490
CA 94702
BoetI1Ing Treeland Farms (Wholesale to the Trade Only. 2923 AJpIne Road (650) 8514770
HUlJ9 selection of common and hard to find tree " PortoIa V~ CA 94028
Tree Movers of Mtn VIeW (650) 968-6117
Peninsula Air Spade Contr8cIors Who Perform Tree-Friendly Air Excavation
MIchael Youna. Urban Tree ant (650 321-0202
BIll Patchett. Treescaoes (Burllnaamel (650 574-0354
Matthew K1dd (650 298-8937
(888) 969-8733 or
Arborwell Neil WooIner cell (925) 260-
6655
11m Geddes Tree Care (see
T.... MaInt8nance
Advanced Tree Care- Rob WeatheriH (650l 566-9539 or 839-9539
ArboIwell Also contact Neil WooIner Main Office 1(888) 969-
cell (925l260-6655 8733
Area CUstom- Ron Walker (65Ol969-7076
811 PIateman 650.595.5135
Bob Yamane- Noonan's Tree Care Redwood~ 650.367.8818
BIoIaTech-8rendan Nelson Cell (4081 639-2189
Chris Hall- West Coast Tree Care South Bav 408.379.1442
Dan Hoskins 650.322.4400
Anderson South Bay 408.378.2261
GB MItchell South Bav (408} 929-3040
Hanry Aldalan "CIty Ad:Iorist" Woodside MobIle (650) 222-1n1
Ian Geddes Tree Care 408 374-8233
=~ Los Gatos 408 370-2089
Palo Alto 650 428-8733
Lane 650.941.0240
MaJX O'brien - no brush hauHna Menlo Palt (650l 327..()450
Mayne Tree Expert Co. - RIchard Huntington & Kevin San Cartos 650.593.4400
Kieitv
McCallhv Tree SoecIaltJas Menlo Park (650} 367-7552
Michael Y....tfit'O. Urban Tree Mana~ent Santa Clara (650)321-0202
Nature FIrst- J Nama & Mimi South Bay (831) 562-8233
Site Address: 10495 North de AnzB, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5112/06
PhoneIFax(650) 697-0990
Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International SocIety of Arbor\culture
16 of 31
3-tjq
~lh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBORIST
.\~
~~.~
...... M." ~I." "'" N
" ~. ,. ..... -'-.~... ".'
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #WG-3172
East Bay
415 388-2931
650 940-1452
510.636.0781
Ra Harrls--Artl in Trees
John
Treescapes. Inc.
Torrey Young & David Nelson
MOl Vall Marin Coun
Mountain View
(The above sources have been known to provide hlgh"<lualily arborlculture services In the past. They are not guaranteed or
endorsed by the author.)
7.0 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions
Any legal description provided to the consultant/appraiser Is assumed to be correct. Any tides and ownership to any
property are assumed to be good and marXetable. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal In character. Any and all
property is appraised and evaluated as through free and clean, under responsible ownership and competent
management.
It is assumed that any propetty Is not In violation of any applicable codes, ordinance, statutes, or other government
regulations.
Care has been faken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verlfled Insofar as possible;
however, the consultant/appraiser can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of infonnation provided by
others.
The consultant/appraiser shall not be required to gtve testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless
subsequent contractual arrangements are made, Including payment of an additional fee for such services as described in
the fee schedule and contract of engagement.
Unless required by law otherwise, the possession of this report or a copy lt1ereof does not imply right of publication or use
for any other purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior expressed written or verbal
consent of the consultant/appraiser.
Unless required by law otherv.1se, neither all nor any part of the contents of this report, nor copy thereof, shall be
conveyed by anyone, including the client, to the pubrlC through advertising, public relations, news, sales. or other media,
without the prior expressed conclusions, Identily of the consultant/appraiser, or any reference to any professional society
or InstitUte 01' to any initialed deslgnetlon conferred upon the consultant/appraiser as stated in his qualifications.
this report and any vaiues expressed herein represent the opinion of the consultant/appraiser, and the
consultant'slappraiser's fee Is In no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value, a stipulated result, the
occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported.
Sketches, drawings, and photographs In this report, being Intended for visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should
not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys unless expressed otherwise. The reproduction of any
InfonnatIon generated by engIneers, archl1ects, 01' other consultants on any sketches, drawings, or photographs is for the
express purpose of coordination and ease of reference only. inclusion of said information on any drawings or other
documents does not constitute a representation by Walter Levison to the sufllciency or accuracy of said information.
Unless expressed otherWiSe:
a. Information contained in this report covers only thOse Items that were examined and re1Iects the conditions of
those Items at the time of inspectlon; and
b. the inspection Is limlled to visual examination c:A accessible Items without dissecllon, excavation, probing, or
coring. There is no warranty or guaranlBe. expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencleS of the plants or
property in quesUon may not arise In the future.
loss or alteration of any part of this report Invalidates the entire report.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
PhonelFax (650) 697-0990
RegIstered Member, American Society of Consulting ArborIsls and Member of the IntemaIIonal Society c:A Arlxlria.dture
17 of 31
j-5D
~lh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBORIST
,\\.
~)...
..~~:_ ':~ ".:;,~'.. .:..:..'.~~_"c
ASCA Registered Consultino Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #WG-3172
Arborist Disclosure statement
Arborisls are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend
measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of IMng near trees. Clients may
choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or to seek addlllonal advice.
Arbor;sts cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a Iree. Tree are living organisms
that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Amarisl cannot
guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumsfances, or for a specified peliod of time. Likewise, remedial
treatments. like any med'lClne, cannot be guaranteed.
Treatment, pruning, and removal of trees may Involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborisfs services such as
property boundaries, property ownershlp, site lines, disputes betWeen neighbors. and other issues. Arborists cannot take
such considerations into account unless complete and accurate information Is disclosed to the arborisl An arborist should
then be expected to reasonably rely upon the completeness and accuracy of the Infom1atlon provided.
Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees Is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to
eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate the trees.
8.0Certification
I hereby certify that aU the statements of fact in this report are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief, and are made in good faith.
Signature of Consultant
5-12-06
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
PhoneVFax(650) 697-0990
Registered Member, American SocIety of Consulting Arborists and Msmber of the International SocIety of ArborIculture
18 of 31
3-5J
~lh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBOR 1ST
,\\.
JJN. )..
....... "-' ..... '. .',; ,-' ~
,- .,.. .." ......~-_.-.I-
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist tfWC-3172
9.0 Tree Charts
.B'i!..... ~ Heelth & Overall
Tiee ~Ig . Common NIlme I Helghtl Structure Condlllon NOTES ON CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS.
~_c= 2E:O Spnllld RlltIngs PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, HEAlTH
# o ...!!! Sclenlfflc Name RlItlng
.......",0. I-.!!!",,< (ft.) (0-100% AND STRUCTURE.
ll'::5 Cl <> (0-100%)
.E ear;l1)
One 14" dia.lmb has gone vertical @4-ftAG
lo become a cadoni1ant malnstem and
supports a signiIicant poIfion ci \lie canopy
(4- 25% of trAaI ClIlOp)'). Root Ikn Intact. and
visible. Tree has been Imbed up lo approx.
deodar cedar 14-ftAG wiIh a 15" dIamBIer pruning cut on
60% east side. Ilnb dsnBge 011 north side rllree
1 X 25.5/14.0 Cedrus 60/50 70/55 Fair (vehIc:Ie impact @1~AG). AU imer bnIlcI1es
deodara pruned oot. Root expansion ~
the exIsli'1g AIC DUt to 15-1n8/ll'ft from Inmk
edge. live Crown Rallo: 80%, but fnner
branches fllII1lMllIlowBIs lwig density. FoIiIM'
color II(IIIII8l TVotg IIldension moderate tD
good. Ap/clII nlllfist8m @554l AG may have
been pnIled out (lDpped?). see pIloIos.
Tree ties been limbed up 10 25-ft AG on lhe
south side of the canopy. Inner lnncIles hlMl
been reIllCNed I1rDughoul tree, elfectivett
'Iion-IlIIilg' it (same as lnIe 11). One 20.5"
dilnelef limb bks off IIIIinsIem at 4.5-11 AG,
preclldng Inmk lIIBIISlIUIlIll at lhal height.
ThIs limb exlBnds north8ast at 7-1 AG In a
hlllizomal pos/Iion, and bends vertically,
c:omprislng 20-30% of the total canopy. TIlls
s1em Ill88SlIllS >50% rJ 1he maiI.:Aell, (bad),
deodar cedar but 1'llI1'llMlI 01 the sIllm WllIIkI remt. in
2 39.5" @2-ft Cedrus 60/50 70/50 60% significant CCIIOp)' loss. T'MI codamilant
AG. Fair malnslems fork @35-IAG In a \lei)' nanow
deodara aolch wID1 ilcU:Ied balk.. stems ~ tD be
partiaIy fused at 1his height. SIllms may
requie througlHlolt bracing tD prevent spItllut
at 35-ft live Crown Rallo: 80%, though imar
foIage pnJIIl1I has reduced Ive twig density.
Twf;/ extension moderaIe III good. Normal
foilI' color. Nate 1ree /ocaIlId on sol "island"
SImlIlnlIed by aspIIal TRllk base is 1.5-fl
above asphaI parkilg lot eIBYaIlon. Roct
9llplnllan cuing Cl.lIb and AJC
buc:tI . See
Tree appears to be 15-20 yeas aid based 1I1
growlh 1818 0I1h1s &pecies iT ilrigali8d, wide
open sol root zone seIIIIVS illhis geograpIIic
coast area. BassI sprouIs8lllll~ from !he bekMo-
3 redwood 63/65 63% grade 1Igno/uber. possIIly due tD s/ress from
23.0 Sequoia 80118 Fair recent pruning. Tree was hied up 10 remove
scaIIoIds belween zero and 16-1 AG.
sempervirens Epiaxnil: shoals arising from the pRlling cut
wounds aong the mainstem. and along some
scaIfoid limbs. SiIB irrigation system may not
have been activ8 over 01'$0. Live
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
Phone/Fax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, AmerIcan SocIety of Consulling Arborlsts and Member of the International SocIety of Arboriculture
19 of 31
3'5~
~lh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBOR 1ST
,\\..
~~~
~~~I,''''. '.'.". -.
. '.". ...,.......-..-....-
ASCA Reaistered Consulting Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #V'YG-3172
!J@~ 5J; Health & OveraU
TIM '!ltilPd common NIune I HeIghtI structu.. Condition NOTES OM CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS,
, {! if 2 Ie ScitntHfe Nlme SpJud RatIngs RatIng PROTECTION REQUIREIIENTS, HEALTH
I- .c Ill) (11-100% AND STRUCTURE.
:J l! each) (0-100%)
Crown Ratio: 7S%. Twig extensiDII and \Wig
density poor \0 moderate. Nonnal bunk taper.
Normal scaffold extension. Probably drought
stressed from lack of irrigation. Condition %
not high enough for lransplanl See pholDS.
Tree applllIIS to be 15-20 years old. Trunk
edge is 24b:heS 00Ilh Of lie exlstiIg buldil'4l
fotIIdaliCln comer (see map and pholDs
below). SUbgrade Iignoblber is IlkeIy wsy ne<I'
or presskr.j agabsIlJlls footing, wIIh very IiIIIe
root eIol,galiDn possible. Dellloltilln of lhis
fooIi'Jg IlllI)' ~ the bee silce the mot
coast syslIlmis IkeIy dIIIIed8d along the existing
redwood 73% fomdaIIon. Tree has been recenUy 1i'OOed up
4 25.0 Sequoia 80130 75170 Good to 16-18-ft AG will epIconrit shooIs allsIng
from pnI!ilg cuIs and along scaIfoId lIlltIs as
sampetvirens lie bee IeSp(lIld& k)wounding. Modefale foIar
densIlr. Mudt:oale .... \Illig extension. live
Crown Rallo: IS%. PlmabIy draUgIt stressed
from lack or reguR irigaIon. Tree concfdion %.
good llIlCIIIjl fer lrlInsplD, lhough roo!
deftedIon isSue and trunk Iflllllleler greater
lhmI2O-iIcheS makes IJlls a poor to rnodenIte
cendIdsle. See ....;.....,
Clnlpy 'hole" 011 soolh side where scaIfokIs
!IIIl nisSilg. Tree Hmbed up to 2CJ-ftAG (old
p1UriIY.l WOlIlIds). Tree appelIS 10 be the age
oflhe exisIIng building (circa 1973= 33 years).
Inner branches pnIled out betWeen !he
coast ITIIIiIsIBm and 50% of the distn:e oot 10
5 redwood 69% scaIfLid" Rcol zone Is open soil wtlh
42.7 Sequoia 80/45 70165 Fair conaeIe palhs and 1IagsIlllles. WIde Inmk
IIInwilh exlJeme bullnlsSlng 011 00Ilh, east,
sempervirens and soulIIeast sides of trunk (good). Folia-
color 1IllImlII. Twig densiI1 and exlllnsion is
poor to n:Jderate. Tree drought slJ'ess;ad. live
CI'OIIII Ratio: 7S%, though twig densiIy
Iow8red due to Inner branch pl1JliIg. TOIl
IanIe ID See DbolDs.
Two codon1iRlrimBInslBmS fork at 15-ftAG in
a JllIIIIW CIW:h wilh Included baJk (see
photos), which reduces !he slrucIurBI rating
slgnlllclldly. SpedBs YfKY suscep1IIIe to
fIaIhead borW I net InlgatBd heaVIly. Stanng
white alder 45% on tnIIk 01.5-1 AG Is dlaracleIisIk; of
6 X 13.3 Alnus 45128 50/35 IIaIhead borer i11Bs1a1iDn (see phoIo). Tree
rhombifo1ia Poor was assessed when oul of leaf. Bark canker
IIllIed @25-ftAG 011 no(,j,wesf, side of bee,
appIOXlmalllIy 5-ft in 1eng1h. live aown raIio:
50%. Mlderate Ive twig density. Bde bebfJeen
zero and 8-ft AG is z1g-zag in .... S-fonnatlon.
Some scalfokllinbs have been pruned back
to clear the . . windows.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza. Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
PhonelFax (650) 697..Q990
Registered Member, American Society of consulting AibOr1sts and Member c:A the international Society of Arboriculture
20 of 31
3-53
~lh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBORIST
A\
JM~
.._..,....... ., ,.,~
." .,."..".......hm.'.._.
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified ArOOnst fNoIG-3172
;Glic;: i!1~ . Health & av...n
Tree Common Name I Helghtl structure Condition NOTES ON CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS,
I o i'" ~ J~ Scllntlflc Name Spread Ratings Rating PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, HEALTH
~ ",0:: (ft.) (0-100% AND STRUCTURE.
De~ g each) (0-100%)
Coast
7 4.5 redwood 20/10 75/75 75%
Sequoia Good
sampervirens
Coast
8 5.3 red\wod 22/12 80170 75% Deformed apical meristem.
Sequoia Good
E*U11pervirens
W_1eak eastlllree may be supplying
Coast much needed lJrigalIon 10 the tree during the
redwood 75% hot summer period. ScaIJaIds may need to be
9 30.0 Sequoia 65130 75f75 Good pruned back ID dell' lhe proposed building.
sempelVirens WI ~ 15-linear feel oftrae prrABction out
from Inmk edge.
Coast Northeast side IacI:s sc;alfold &mils dll8lo
10 16.7 redwood 60118 70165 65% crowding from Iree #9. Canopy lopsided. and
Sequoia Fair extends sauthwesl. Recommend use II a
sempet1Iit9ns \IUl1k bulferfor added prolecIlon of IIlIs tree.
Located on neighbc:l's prqIElI1y approxinaIeIy
4-5 nnear fllet souIh of the property Ine.
Heavily inlgaled wIIh woody slJUcIuraI rools
exIIndi'Ig 00 glade and paItiaIy damaged ID
at least 20-30 feet southward or more inID lie
IurfgIllSS Iands<aped area maIIIlined by the
neighbor. ClnDpy owrh8ngs!he 10495 N de
Anza projecI area, lIld may require pruning ID
Fraxinus sp. clear the aiIspace for lIle proposed new of6ce
45% bUkIng fooIpI"d.
11 13.0 (appears to 60130 50/40 Poor
be 'Modesto') North side or roolsyslBm may be SMJed
dlling sIlll pIM dewlIopment adMties such as
foIIIdaIIon _ ~ irrigallon rme
IllJ3tr~,l'lll~ and grubbing ld II exIsIing pin
ID be demaIIshed 01\ 10495 N de Anza.
AIfecI8d by Sjlmg season foiar anIhraa10se
fungus which is causk1g leaf curl and
!lunIbID. ModestO ash Is ~.!he cUtivar
which uhIlIIs Ihls . infeclion.
AD same as tree #11.
Fraxinus $p. 55% At least two stem IIp/ItDu\s were noted irlllIe
12 17.7 (appears to 65/55 65/45
Fair ca'lllPY. Narrow cadomInant aotclles. Roots
be 'Modesto') growing on grade damaged by lawnmower
souIh IIlree.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza. Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5112106
PhonelFax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, American Society of ConsuIIIng ArborIsts and Member of the International Society of ArborIculture
21 of 31
?> -5 Ii
~lh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBORIST
,\\.
~~ )..
. "'''::. ~,~~:.-":"'::'..':_~~,
ASCA Recistered Consultinc Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #WG-3172
d;l@l M Health & Overall
TI8I '!li. . Connon Name I Helgbtl Structure Condition NOTES ON CONSTRUCTION IMPACT$,
. ~!i ~~J~ Sclenffflc N.me Spread RaUnga RatIng PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS. HEALTH
(ft.) (0+100% (0-100%) AND STRUCTURE.
g each)
All same as lree #11.
Fraxinus sp. 49% Note this tree lacks root "are on north side of
13 12.4 (appears to 65/30 50/45 Poor trunk base...oould be a structural issue.
be 'Modesto') Nanow high I3lOIlY with natural deadwood
in lower 213 or lJee.
16.0 Frax;nus $p.
{two stems 55% AD same as tree #11.
14 (appears to 60/45 60/50
fork at 4.5- be 'Modesto') Fair NIIITOW canopy extends NW - SE.
flAG)
Fraxinus $p. 30% AI SIIIItl as IJee #11. Tnri. edge is 5-ft B-il.
15 8.5 (appecl'S to 60/20 30130 from fBn<:e edge. VfJIY IIII1TOW 1iniIed canopy
Poor spread willi Wg diebIIck ttvoughout tree.
be 'Modesto') G1rd1ilg root on east side or trunk (bad).
AI same as lree #11.
Fraxinus &p. 55% CMopy1opslded to nllllh with grow\ll
16 11.6 (appears to 60130 60/55 Fair exIendIlg IDwIIlI the SIIlIgIt (away from the
be 'Modesto) bIiIcq jUstsoulh of Iree). IltiIlipJe
codDll1ilanl maillslems @6-ft aboVe grade
wII!l balk Inclusion.
Fraxinus sp. 20% AI same as tree #11.
17 9.2 (appeas to 65/22 20120 Very Twig cflllback exIllnSNe 1hroug00ut canopy.
be 'Modesto') Poor r..tnInaI scaIroId rrnb extension. Trook edge is
5-ft 6-iI. from fence.
Fraxinus sp. AD same as Iree #11.
30%
18 14.9 (appears to 60125 30/30 Poor Tnri edge is +It 1O-in. from renee.
be 'Modesto') Codon'tIant mainstams wl1h narrow aotch.
Fdiw and Iwin cliebId; III
Fraxinus sp. 45% Ramp proposed ato41- 6-8 feet out from trunk
19 6.7 (appears to 35120 45/45 Poor may negalIveIy inplK;llhis tree by causing
be 'Modesto) root loss or root dlInage.
Fraxinus sp. 55% ~ proposed at ..,.. 6-8 feet out from trunk
20 8.3 (appen to 35125 57/55 Fair may negatively inpact ltis tee by causing
be 'Modesto') root loss or mot danage.
Fraxinus sp. 42% CMopy lopsided III \he east. Tlllnk leans east.
21 12.5 (appears to 35120 45/40 Ramp proposed at -t/- 6-8 feel aU: from lnIlk
Poor may negatively impac;t IhIs IJee by causing
be 'Modesto') root loss or mol dllllage.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza. Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
PhonelFax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member. American Society of ConsutUng Arborists and Member of the International SocIety of Arboric:uIture
22 of 31
3-SS
~ 1Y~l~n;N!:f.Yig~R
.\\.
~~.~
......... .,. '. ,T' ,~
, .,. ,. ._oc. ........._,,__...
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist tN/G-3172
a!;'il.... ~ He8Ith & Ovnll
Tree ~t. . Connon NIme I Helghtl Structure CondIUon NOTES ON CONSfRUCTlON IMPACTS,
1;..", ~i5i~ Spread Ratlngl Pl'cOTECTION REQUREIIENTS, HEALTH
. ~i-3f Sclenlfflc Name RatIng
11::5 (Ill (0.100% (OotOO%) AND STRUCTURE.
.5 each)
Fraxinus sp. Tree has been limbed up to clear the
42% neighbor's ParXill9 lot spaces. Ramp proposed
22 7.7 (appears to 30/30 45/40 Poor at ..,- 6-8 feel out from trunk may negiltively
be 'Modesto') impact lhis tree by causing root loss or root
danage.
Fraxinus sp. 15%
23 8.6 (appe<n to 28118 15115 Poor ExlBnsive twig dieback.
be 'Modesto')
Fraxinus 81'. 50%
24 7.8 (appears to 30/22 60/50 Fair Canopy is lopsided to the south.
be 'Modesto')
Fraxinus 81'. 50%
25 7.1 (appears to 28130 55/50 Fair
be 'Modesto')
Fraxinus $p. 67%
26 9.616.5 (appears to 35135 70165 Fair
be 'Modesto')
Fraxinus 81'. 20% ExtensiVe stem and ~ dieback on north side
27 11.0 (appe<n to 30125 20115 Very
of tree.
be 'Modesto') Poor
Coast
28 18.2 redwood 60125 65170 69% Root syslen1 sewred at 6-feet norII1 or 1nI1k
Sequoia edge for drainage pipe.
rvirens
Coast
29 16.0 redwood 60125 65165 65%
Sequoia Fair
89/11U<J1 V~l:>IIS
Coast
30 14.8 red'MXXl 60/18 65165 65% Tree has been crown raised alongside the
Sequoia Fair exIsIing oftIce bulling just west r1 bunk.
sa . 8
Coast
red\wod 55% ScaIfoId Imbs slubIled back to ae. existing
31 19.0 Sequoia 60/15 65/55 Fair DlIIce buIdIng and Iighl poIe,leaVIng scaffolds
inIact mainly on the IlOI1heast side of bee only.
se . s
Coast
redv.ood 75% Root growlh assumed extensive given the
32 16.3 Sequoia 65128 75n5 Good large open sol irrigated landscape area
surrounding free.
se.!!!2!!Mrens
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights ReselVed
Version 5/12/06
PhonelFax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member. American SocIety of Consulting Artlortsts and Member of the International Soclety of Arborlcultu1'9
23 of 31
?;".Sb
~lh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBORIST
~\
, .'::'. ',..;.~:..,'.'...'~~.:. ,~::.
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #NIIG-3172
a . Health & OveraD
E111~<c ~;g HelgldI structure NOTES ON CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS,
Tree 1i1@ . Common Name I Condition
. ~!it:l ~jJ~ ScIenIiIk Name SpI1lld RatIngs RaIIng PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, HEALTH
~5 c.. 1ft.) (0-100% (0-100%) AND STRUCTURE.
s each)
Coast
redwood 65% Root exlBnsion and expansion cauSing
33 X 20.0 60/25 65/65 massive buckling and heaving of the existing
Sequoia Fair Ale parking lot sulfacing.
itens
Coast
34 X 17.7 redwood 40120 75f75 75%
Sequoia Good
sa . s
Coast
redVtUld 50% Apical m.,Ostall appys to have bloWn out.
35 X 14.7 Sequoia 40/20 60/50 Fair Tree has been pruned on souIh side to clear
lhe ~ ~ht pole.
Sweelgum 37% Tree has been top pruned: a poor pruling
36 X 8.8 Uquidambar 30/25 45/35 Poor prac:tice which pennanenII)' deslroys the
.L . b/a'lChlng archIledure.
OIy,....."..a
Coast
37 X 28.0 red\MXld 60/30 75f75 75%
Sequoia Good
S8~rens
Coast
38 X 26.2 redwood 60130 70nD 70%
Sequoia Good
59 irens
Sweetgum 50% Codoninant mEir.stems. Stem d'teback on
39 X 8.7 Uquidambar 40/27 55/45 Fair nartheaSt side Ii lhe canopy.
.
Coast Two codoninanl mainstems bk nelr grade in
40 X Estimated redwood 60130 70155 60% a narrow croId1 wiIh dense sprouls emanating
16/14 Sequoia Fair from the basal rQnoIuber such that I could not
'I'~' ns IraVerse !he Irunk c11'CU1T1erence.
Coast
41 X 12.3 redwood 50/25 10110 10% Very poor IhIe twig density lIld extenslon.
Sequoia Poor
. s
Coast
redwood 69% EpIcorrnIc shools IDiiI1g from old plll1i1g
42 X 13.5 Sequoia 40/25 70165 Fair wuunds whenllawBr scaIfoId limbs were
I'eIl'llMllI along trunk.
. ns
Coast Sidewalk conaele was replaced acijacent to
redwood 65% Irells #43 a'ld #44, presumably d~ to damage
43 14.0 Sequoia 50/25 65/60 Fair from roa: expansion and ex1ellSion under the
conaete SUIfacJlg. ScaIfokIs extend
semoervirens ncrthward.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
Phone/Fax(650)697~90
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborlsts and Member of the International SOcIety of ArborIculture
24 of 31
j--51
~l~ Walter Levison
r CONSULTING ARBORIST
\~
~)...
...... _W' A'. ,".- --" .. -~
<..~." ...-..............,.
ASCA ReQistered Consulting Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #WC-3172
1II1lcc ~ Health & 0v<<aII
TIM ill. . Conunon N8me I Helglttt structure Condition NOTES ON CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS,
, t2!i~ ~~I~ ScI8nfIffc N.me Spread RatIng. RatIng PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, HEALTH
(fl.) 10-100% .(0.100%) AND STRUCTURE.
.s each)
Coast
redwood 57% One codominant mainslem was removed a11-
44 16.3 65/25 60/55 fool above grade. Lower 6-ft of trunk is S-
Sequoia Fair formalion.
'irens
Coast
45 17.8 redwood 65/25 40/40 40%
Sequoia Poor
. s
Coast
redwood 65% One codominant maIIslsm was 1emovedal.1-
46 14.2 Sequoia 6Ofl5 70160 Fair foot above grade. Apical II...Wbm appeas \0
haVe split out. No scaffolds extend wesIWWd.
se 'mns
Coast 25%
47 X 18.9 redwood 60/20 25/25 Very Poor live lwIg density and extension.
Sequoia
sa . s Poor
Coast 25% Poor live lwIg densIly iI'Id extension. Nate lhat
redwood
48 X 25.7 65/25 25/25 Very root crown Is bullRlssed but wilh no IateiaI
Sequoia roots visIlIe. Root aown is well above lhe
Poor exIstlng sidllwaIk finish grade elevation.
. ns
Coast
redwood 50% Note utIilr box is aadIed on north side d root
49 X 14.7 Sequoia 55120 50150 Fair aown, probably due to root elongation and
expansion.
.
Coast
50 X 12.~ redwood 35/12 50150 50%
Sequoia Fair
,..lrens
Coast
51 20.2 redwood 5500 60150 55% One codorrMnanl. mail... was removed at 3-
Sequoia Fair feet above grade on east side of tree.
.
Coast
52 X 15.0 redwood 40120 60160 60% Root expansion n eIoo&lalion causing
Sequoia Fair sidewall heave on ncril side of trunk.
.
Coast
23.1 redwood 70% Open soli root zone is adequalely large for
53 X Sequoia 60/25 70170 Good decent root exteIlSiDn and soil moisture
retenIIoo.
lens
Coast
54 X 10.8 redwood 35/18 65/65 65% Partially shaded by tree #1l31opy.
Sequoia Fair
, , ~~, .
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights ReselVed
Version 5/12/06
PhonelFax(650)697~
Registered Member, American SocIety of Consulting ArborIsIs and Member of the International Society of ArborIculture
25 of 31
3-5g
~lh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBORIST
,\~
~~
...~.....'.....'. ,I c,,~
. ._".,.........~_..L..
ASCA Reaistered Consultin!l Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist tlWCM3172
. H8IIth &
.11@~ ~I~' . Height! structure OVeraU NOTES ON CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS,
Tree Common Name' Condition
. OEDi! 2 I~ ScIentIfIc Name Spnlad RatIngs RatIng PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, HEALTH
I-&~ I- ~ (ft.) (0-100% AND STRUCTURE.
l!!: each) (0-1110%)
Coast
55 X 12.9 redwood 40/20 70/65 70% Pal1iaWy shaded by tree #1 canopy
Sequoia Good
.
Coast
56 X 15.2 redwood 45/18 70flO 70% Tree is SQIIlllV/haI: shaded by tree #1 iJ'ld tree
Sequoia Good #2 canopy.
~ 'ns
Coast
57 13.5 redwood 60/25 65/65 65% Tree is SClI1IllWhal shaded by tree #1 iJ'ld tree ,
Sequoia Fair #2 canopy.
. S
Coast Pm1iaIIy shlllled by tree #2 a.lOllY. WiH need
redwood 75% same demoIIiDn specs, inigalion, etc. as per
58 19.5 Sequoia 55/20 75n5 Good !lee #2. ExistI1g curb and AlC is
approxinateIy 3.5-1 west and 6.o..t south of
---- . Ihe \nIlk !lIbe (see .
sem
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
PhoneJFax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, American SocIety of Consulting ArborIsts and Member of the International Society of Arboriwlture
26 of 31
3~q
~lh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING AR80RIST
~\
..........".,........'N
. .," ,., -,." ...-...-....
ASCA R isterecl Consultin Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #WC-3172
10.0 Tree Map (use scale bar to scale off this sheet)
~~.._-~
I
i~
1m.
~ ~ :
I'i""\
l r .
. .
.A;-
L~==--- ~__
--=----- ~ -.. -
. _. ..:..+---___. ='". . L-J . ~ . -u.. . .._~
I .. --- --. ~ ......._-rr.: ~~:
I! ; ~8-----~H~~J-_~. ~-., . .~:;:,,' 'l
I . ~ 'I I .r~ ~ i '. ~ ,.........' 1-. Ii=" +': -
i: --- ~ .... . ..~ " .... 1:0"1' t. ~.
.7"" --.-v.u!L.....*--'- .."",-- I. .... .. ---~"--~ 11:-.
'1 i: Ip ! I. 1~'~': · , " .' iTU '.
~ 2.::i: ~ .................~ ," 1:;J!4 '. :;'~_A I - L ..' "a
".~. ~ · 1 ..$ '..! i Ii' ~ li::'f " ..
I I ' ? . .... ill .,. '. _,n.
.-: l_ t~",-r-i:-;.~..,;r,"~,,:-,::~,,_.J. __ ~ - i tJ ~'- L! "0
:"; <f11 j rlr~ i
-' ~ 'I. .= ,..
"Iiol!t,:; .
.. -......r.
. ..
I ~ ' ,..
. ,: l
: i . ,~l'
. 'OL'LIB'tZN"fI 3Q..HiliON.
, .
I ;~
. I,
~ [':
j !
I i
.
~ ;,
111
or. !
,~~
I" ;.
I~ Ir!
"
'r' J
~~
~: .
~
<L .
u.l
t::
11
Trees to be removed as per the above map Include trees #1, 6, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39,40.41,42,47.48,49.50, 52,53,54.55.and#56.
Due to the scale of this map. the chain link tree protection fencing routes are not
shown.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza. Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
PhonelFax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture
27 of 31
3-i.O
~lh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBORIST
.\\.
~\..
"'_~I, ...hl. "..,U
,_ ", ." ..... .~.~ _r_'_
ASCA Reaistered Consulting Arborist #401
ISA Certified Arborist #WC-3172
11.0 Photographs
Heritage cedar #2 to be retained with a +/- 22-
linear radial foot chain link tree protection
fence (about 45-feet in total diameter).
Heritage cedar #1 (foreground) and
Heritage cedar #2 (background right).
Coast redwood #3 to be retained.
Coast redwood #4 to be retained.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ AD Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
PhonelFax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, American Society of ConsulUng ArborIsts and Member of the lntemalional Society of Arborlculture
280131
3..{) J
~h Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBOR 1ST
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
A full canopy view of coast redwood #5 to be
retained. Live twig density overall is poor to
moderate due to past pruning out of the inner
branches.
Close-up of brown spotting on lower trunk bark.
of white alder #6, indicating flathead borer
activity .
A\..
~A
,""::. ":.'.-,::::.'.'";,..~'.:'::,_~.
ISA Certified ArOOrist #!WC~3172
White alder #6, showing the two
codominant mainstems with narrow crotch
and bark inclusion.
Left side: Ash specimens #11, 12, and #13,
just south of the southern property border
that may or may not be affected by site plan
foundation work on the 10495 North de
Anza side of the root systems.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
PhoneIFax. (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, Amerlcan SocIety of Consulting Afborists and Member of the IntemalIonal Society of Arborlculture
29 of 31
8~~
~jb Walter Levison
r CONSULTING ARBORIST
ASCA Reaistered Consultina Amorist #401
-.,-...........
~,}:{~: .~', --.
,~::~:\_~ ::"'V{~:~~
of"~"';<~). /~.; ,
.", .~',' ~......jf.....':'" .
~~~~.:,~}\
:;,",'I!" - ,." ""
~, - '::;"
-,,", , " ~
,~:;:~..~./: ~t:?~~:-'
- :':'-':,;:.-'
. . ~ '.:"--
. ;,oo';;;'-,.r,
~-=.;, 'I:!<f ;p~
.~
.,.......t
(":i,' \ ~I"
~f'--.';'.,-
w...
~1I.
I!."....J...,.
.~~~
{P~~"...
.'~j,Jf,,~~' ~
~
~, '~'.-
'~i
~ -~ <
, .
'ft
.r'
~:.
..
;, ~~.
..J L
~. ....
,t~1~-'
'Jr-
~t
'~'\
. "
o,!,,'
.; .
T'
'.
>.:.:;.
Center: Coast redwood #9.
Right: Coast redwood #10.
Both Trees are to be preserved.
,\\
~~-~
~~. ~- '~'.'. ,".'"
... ". ", "'''M' _~_,
ISA Certified Arborist tfNG-3172
Ash specimens just south of the southern
property line, looking westward along the
neighbor's existing parking lot.
Left to right Coast redwoods #31. 32. 35, 40. Left to right: Coast redwoods #43 through
41, 42, 43. 44, 45, and #46. #50.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza. Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12/06
Phone/Fax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, American SocIety of Consulting Arborists and Member c:A the International SocIety of Arboriculture
30 of 31
3---b3
~lh Walter Levison
r' CONSULTING ARBOR 1ST
ASCA R istered Consultin Arborist #401
Right to left: SWeetgum #36 and coast
redwood #37 to be removed.
tC-'~~- .
__ :a.~ . :
...= -
B~ . "n.
.... ._.~.'...
.. '. . ....
.
. - \t1."
~. ,',/ .,.' ",-...'.,
~c
Close-up of existing curb and AlC on south
side of coast redwood #58 to be retained. just
north of cedar #2. The same demolition issues
apply here.
,\\.
A...~ \.
...... "" ..... >J .".. ~
".' l' ...... ....,,~ ..~ l
ISA Certified ArOOrist #WG-3172
Close-up of existing curb and AlC around
trunk of heritage cedar #2. Demolition of
these materials within the dripUne will need
to be phased to the very end of the project
to minimize root disturbance during
construction .
Example of a correctly installed trunk buffer
on a large coast redwood specimen. A 2-
inch thick layer of orange plastic is wrapped
around the trunk between zero and a-feet
above grade before the 2X4 boards are set
up.
Site Address: 10495 North de Anza, Cupertino
Walter Levison @ All Rights Reserved
Version 5/12106
PhonelFax (650) 697-0990
Registered Member, American SocIety of Consulllng Arborists and Member of the International Society of ArborIculture
31 of 31
w
~-
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
GENEI\\L SlATS
SITE AREA: 72.241 SF BLDG. AREA: 80,000 SF (20.000/FLR)
(1.6SS ACRES) Fl~S~ ,
FAR: .83
DE AIflA REQ'C SETBACK: 50' PARKING
REeI'O; 210 STALLS (3.5(1000 SF)
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: '1-1 t\OUR (1 PF;R 265 Sf)
BASIC: 14,000 Sf PROPOSED:
t.1ULTI-S1QR'(; 28,000 SF AT G~t~ 92 STALLS
SPRtNKU:REO; 56,000 Sf
2 SIDE-YARDS: 84,000 Sf ~~cr. 1 ~~AL~
(M.LOWABlL) UCT.
OCCUPANCY: 8 (omcE) PROPOSED: 216 STAlLS p.6/1000 SF)
i
?
j "p-';'
~1.1~
"=\ :::"" ,
1'-
."1,-
\..... ' -:7-
<>
/' " V,'
I
"---J
GJ SITE PlAN
A1
"""'"
"""
-
-
"""
124' ,.
SCALE: 1 "=20'
'*1 lll8lW'
OFFICE
___".'-1
-~
:~~~~~~:J~
G;) SITE SECTION
A1
SCALE: t "=20'
",
-....
-....
'n....
OFFICE
--,.....
L
,
,
.............!;t,._
,~...
"
................ ~
""'t
Irf
~
---~
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
"
Ilt:NfZAII,'
,->
Rev. 0
NICH. IIUlG. RE\EW
DESIl:lN SUIMIT~
"""'''''''''''
PGEIIilSE
Dole B
JI7aI08
.""""
el2elOS
~f!OlOlI
Any Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
M0165
3 ~ 06
AS NOlED
A1
............._.-........_.~..-...- ...
~
II' '-r II
. I
;:';1
cvf,
10
, I
o
...,
o
'1_"
i gi
. ,
~. i
1'1
10
I I
jg
.
I
I ~I I
101 .
01~_1
0--"'- '"
I J-
I~
0++-- I
" I
.'i' I
;,- 0
, ...,
"
0-- T-
ELEe
ENTRY
LOBBY
0>
I,
IV'=
I'
I
II I
-t:_~-
-
,
I
- ~- -- -ijl-- -
I
I
0h'
0-
I
I
{'15'=0- I I I I
F ---- -~~1-0-ct- 4Q~-a--! 2b"=~~
Q 1ST FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/16.~1'-O'
CHANG
ARCHITECTIJRE
,
'"
I
;,-
'"
o
I
o
'"
I
I I
I'
o
I
o
'"
BROW
BELOW
I
I
I
i
-----~--
Rev. Ileeai _ Il8te B
MOl 8L.DC. Ill\o1EW 3m1OB
DESlGNSlIiIIIIfT..... 4/2e1OB
DESIGN RMSlONS 5I2e/oe
F=+~t~"~~-i=l
Any Mountain
Office Building
GJ 2ND FLOOR PLAN
Cupertino, CA
SCALE: 1/16"""'-0.
Dl8wi~ Title
OFFICE
FLOOR PLANS
Job # A40165
Dille: 3 29 06
Scale: AS NOlED
DI8Wl1By:
Sheet
A2
".....r..._...............,...._.....
I
I;
0f
I.'
.0
''''
0---
I,
10
. I
. ,-
V'O
I'n
~
....
0-
i
I.
10
"1
10
'""
I
~
I.
I~
0----+'"
I
I
I
. I t= ' ·
F- --- - r-, -40~-o---~ 25'=0-&
.
0'
I'
01
'"
Q 3RD FLOOR PLAN
A2.1
B2
0-
0--
0--
0-
, ,
I'
0-
BROW
Ilfl.OW
,
0--
I
I
- -- - -IjI-- -
I
0-
~
T"
i
. I
v
, 1 ! I
;,.
'"
( - 1- 17
-+ I
- -I ; H1r<' T- 1-
, I ,
~I w Ii:::
8
"'! ~ --t,
, I --'-- - _,______-
--.. - 1
I I I
. ! I
0 J-
,
0 ---7
'" I 1 I
I -I-- I
--- I -
. I ,
I
_91 I 1 I MECH.J I
, rCREEN I
1- BROW-
I BELOW
w
----- I-~- ~ - 1- -
! 1 I 0:
. i , IT I>>~I
0' I
.'1
gr
J- I ?-- -?
, _____..1____
--- - - ._-_.~. . BOILER !
i I
Rev. Date a
ARCH.8UlG.1If\'IEW J/a1Oe
0ESlCNSLIIUTW.. 4121I08
DESK::NRt.'IIlSICINS 512elOe
t".c'-c~-F~~t".Oct
Any Mountain
Office Building
SCALE: 1/16-""1'-0.
~ ROOF PLAN
A2.1
SCALE: 1/16", 1'-0"
Cupertino. CA
DllIWlngTItfo
OFFICE
FLOOR PLANS
Job. A40165
Date: 3 29 06
Scale: AS NOlED
Drawn By:
s_
A2.1
~.. ""-. ....."...... ...
(
TRASH
(!lEe,
CJ: ---
r~' -- - -- .-. 1 ~-
i 1
, ,
,
I 10
I- -- I--~ ..... Ll .,... ... II ""'-J,IAJ :
.,'"
-- - 1 92 STAllS ~ 1
I il 1
I"'''' "'... "... "'... ...... w-r f I
i -- I-~ 1
h n I
-- ~1
-.--_..- -- I
,
I ~I
I~
-- I~ HC I
I =i I
- -- , II
I I HC I
.1 I
~- ~ I
T~ -I I
I
..--- . I HC I
I =t 9
, I
I , I
I i I
-~ j I
r ,
'I I
- -_us - I 9 9 I
:~I u r q
- EDGE OF 12 10 I
GARAGE I
,~ ~I I
"-." .~.- 1 DECK 1
- ~ ____--- ABOVE RANP ~' 1
..-.. 1
,-- ABOVE I
.. ". .. . --'- -- -- Lir
IX \ I
, .-.. ... \
6 -'
~ \ , 3
. ;f I
\ /
\ RAMP UP
/
,~O%) [ /
i - ,
Q GRADE PLAN
SCAlE,'/16"=I'-0"
~
r---UGHT
I STAN ARD
r
I
I
9
9
PARKING DECK~
60 STALLS il
117'-4"
PARKING DECK
64 STALLS .
117'-4"
\-.--...-- CONe.
SAFETY
RAIL
ill jl
. I
\ 11 ~I
il! -I
CONe_ I
BEAll ---t
...... "'... "'... 10'-<1. "'-<I' .....
"-<I'
...
io
I
N
I"~ LO
"'...
.,...
......
CONC.
BEAM
n
.:,;.
.
,
~
I
I Rov, On B
13 -1 I ARCH.lI.lnllallBf ""'''''
15 tDlllNSt&I1TA/.. 4h1/all
14 12 12 J tDlllNREWSIONS 5n11tl8
PGEIM5E IJ3tIIOB
RAMP
BELOW
~ 1ST DECK PLAN
~ 2ND DECK PLAN
SCAlE, 1/16"~I'-O"
SCA;L 1/16~=1'-O"
Any Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
D.......TdIe
PARKING
FLOOR PLANS
Job #
Date:
Scale:
Drawn By:
SI1eet:
A40165
32906
AS NOTED
A2.2
....-'....-...--......"'....-......
111\.'_
..w<
fC\ t.ITl. PNolEI,.
'7 ~ SCREEN"'
I """"
i
r
7
C~(PJ) r
~
GlJSS (P4
111\.''"''-\
\H0R2. """"
\ F1N~
a.4~'
HOI<Z.
"""'"
r~\
II1\.r.)
~
i1
ST""
COIJIWNS~\
\
sr.....
CONCftEIE
~ GUAADRM.. (F'1)
I
EL~'+
.
G.
'0
irJ.l
-~
1IlASH
!>lCLOSURE
!IE'IllN)
~~~.
ELO-o
G) NORTH B~I~ ELEVATION (MARIANI)
G) NORTH ~~~oELEVATION (MARIANI)
ItfTLBROIIS-,
i
\
i
HORZ.
"""'"
srucro "
(P2) \
HORZ.
RIIIIlED
~\~
T1lANSllJCENT
GlASS
7 SP_,.)
EL .,~. +
~1
~~
r~
EL~~+
G;) EAST EN~ ~~~ATION (DE ANZA)
ca.oRlCEY
(P1)
(P2)
(P3)
(P4)
SEPIA
RUST COLOR
SLYEll
T1lANSllJCENT OP,,"
CHANG
ARCillTECTURE
.....roco:-
........
G
~20'~+
o I
~ j 1ST ~
EL lo'::o"T
o
,
!!
a 0-0
Rev. D
MOL a.oc. REWW
Di!IlGtlISUBWIlT~
"""''''''''''''
PGE~
Date B
3m/os
41:21108
el2etoe
II!OIM
Any Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
Dl1lWIngTIIIe
ELEVATIONS
Job.
Date:
Scale:
Drawn By:
Sheet
A40165
329
foi5 NOllD
A3
ElM
ST""'" COOCllEJE
rCUAROlWL. BDlND SlAB
EDGE (PI)
CONe.
SLAB EDGE (?l)
CHANG
ARCHITECTURE
COt<<:.IWoIP
----
G) WEST ~~~~LEVATION
STAIHED
COOCllEJE
"""'" (P2)
"
,
e
+~'-"
CONC~\
Sf"""
"""""'"
cw.ROfWL(Pl)
Sf^"""
ca.cRElE
COl..Ut.INS(Pl)
.
o
,
e
j~-o'
fJ..o~+
C?
I
G) EAST ~~_~ATION
C?
I
I
------~
rE1.EV.
OEYONO
----
----
--_-:..-=-~-:::-:..-=---:----
"
,
e
~zi'~
210 OECK :? 61
fJ..20~~Fl.OOR~11
~1i'-O
1STOECl< .
EL -10'-o~. 'T
~
cae:.
.r....._ (PI)
00I<C.$\fE1Y
......1Y1'.
----
----
--:;:::::::--::::--: -
--.:..:..;-;:::---=---
o
,
e
lmAIllIII'aAWtlTl'I.OCa
""'..........
1
EL 0-0 El...-o
Rev.
Deocri
SCALE: '"=10'
ARCH. ~ ..,..
CESlllNSUllMnTM.
DESlGNIl!.YI!lICIt6
PG[1Wl[
3/H108
412&101
SI2aID8
5/30101
G) SOUTH ~'~O~ATION
G)
SOUTH ELEVATION
~
f
IlTLP_
llW< SClOEEN,\
BEYOND (PJ) \
COR-TEN NETAL
LATT1Cf;S11)1iG
08EtilND~OR-
r 1\1._2)
I
?
lII1.l'ANEl.
~ (")
""""......
r
o
~~
(P4) i
"
I [L 43~' +
ny Mountain
Office Building
.
.
,
~
~~.+
Cupertino, CA
Drowi~TIIle
. .
'0
h.l
- ~
2~~.t
ELEVATIONS
fJ.. -0
Job'
DIi8:
Scale:
D......8y:
Sheet
A40165
329
AS NOTED
"
I
~
G) WEST EN~,~~;VATION
A4
...__......,....- .-.
I
VICINITY MAP
..... ......
ANY MOUNTA~N OFF~CES
PRELIMINARY SITE IMPROVEMENTS
J 0495 N. l)E ANZA BOULEVARD
CUPERTINO, CA
"-"1InIK
SURVEYOR ll:GEND:
-___ ICUIlIlllh'ta
- - _ CBrDlJlE
-------- tASJElTtIE"
----- ftRflJlElIlE
--
-
. AQClIEQ\lEltASE
'" .........-
.. --
IC .... .....
ICII: .. aIIW: IIETWN
IOC MCI t1F CUM
. MCKtJF'IAU
CI CAD IMSII
a. CUSS
C5 CIIAWl SPa am_
DO .... _
IllS IDDf' ... SPOUJ
- -.aT
(t) .....
.. Ds:IIIC MIl
EC De Of aIM.
D om tuM: .....
.. 1lISIIIO_
1M ......". .....
EP IDlE or PA......
R: fa or CI8 DDlt.1IIIt
fDC' .. IID'MIImIr COIIIIECIIII'
ff fIII8ED IUXII IEI1VA1IlII
AI ..._
1\ UIIJ .. mYAJIII
At f-.: ... ...
IS .... SWFa ELEVA11DIC
.. ...1IItlD....
. .......
.. --
.. __ DEYA1IlII
.. ... IEIU
.... ............
or __
IIlI' ..., WYA1Qf
- -
If __
J# _.....
lD ..-... _
IF ..... ....
18 lP CW GUnD
UlL UlIlUf....
... ......
III .......
.. -
00 1ft
Po Plw.NT El.lYUIDlt
.. ouu. MIl
FCC JIIllIlIIJMD CDmn' COMCIlElI
N PDIQ' or mnr..u... IfTDSECl10M
M POlYWm. ctt.alIJ[
... -..
IICP IElNRIICED CONCIIEf[ PH
... IlII OfVA'ION
R/W _ or WAY
S ....
W 5O:ARCHI1EC11JRAI.fIl..Q
SID sroflM SUB IIIUIt
so ___
SDCO SRlIY DRMI aL\NOUT
SGI SEt GEOTECHNICAL I[POIlJ"
SIP SEELAHllSCAPEPlAN
ss SAMlTMY KWER
SSP SEE S\'RtJC'MW.. PUHS
ssco SAHlTM'( SEWER ClU.NOVT
STA STATION
TC TOP OF" CURB
TW TOP OF' WAU. nEVA-1lOM
"" TTPlC.\L
'11M 'MTER METER
W DOIIIDTtC WAfER LH:
.
A
~
~
..
..
..
..
,
"
-
......
.
E-T
II
..
o
...
..
R
..
..
..
D
,
'"
--
..
..
II
"
..
..
...
..
....
..
....
..
,
..
...
...
..
~...
..
..
..
"
.
LOCATION MAP
.3l:&E': Ill.$.
A:IJm__fIUl1MM'S~
...,.... "*'
--
.....,
--
-....
.......-
--
.......
.... OR
--
--.......
-....
~uu
--
EIlIiIEfIf'PAWIBrr
--
.......
.-.s R.a Bhl_
.......
--
........--.
--
___ GIIRL ....
--
-HOE
--...
--
_HOE
---
--
-
....
--
--
s.-__1Clf.
--....
SMITIIn'SE-.:_1lEU
""...
=---.:JrllBf1ftD}
.." ....
.........
........
..............
......
__FJtIllETf
_Br_W:
.......-
----0- __
--.
-....
--
---=~ ~ '9
~
,
I
I
I
I
I
~
.p
11
\ 'p p '.. .- .... ....
~
......
---
""JI.: sa-D-tl4
REF.
NORTH
0 '" eo
I I I
_<SCN..E
COPYRIGHT NOTE:
CCP'I'lIGIITOCJWll'QL SlIll\iE'nMG SElMCIS Al.L IIlMIS IIEmMD. NO PARTOF 1IIS DRMM;
IU.TlIEllD'RIXIUCEJ)lY~lltt<<lIJNOciRBYNfY01HERIIE.lHS,~S1URED.
JIflDa:Zm ~ lIWl!IIT1m"<R BY' Nffau\l1ER (It ona SYS1BIl!: 'M1HClU\' 1HEPRIlIt
'RT1E;N~OFOW'f'8.I.SlIl'IaIIlISERw:a.CClI'ES(f"1IISllIlA1N)WfHCl/TN(
~Al.SICNIollllEAIlllST""/IIlENOrVN.ll.
LEGEND
SITE PLAN
.SCALE:: 1-=40.
PROPEJlIY LM
EASOlEHT
..... DlWlI
FIRE WATOI LIME
DOIllESTIC WATDll>>4E
SANf1'AR'( SEWER lINE
SlUBDRAtl LINt (sea)
WAm IIETEIt
..... DlWlI IIIlIT
...... .....
'-"""""< DlWH
STOIIll ,..., CWIlOVT
SAllTAAf' SEWER CLEAMOUT
""..... .....
FlftlStlED SURfACE
DIflE:enottorslOF'E
TREE NOTE:
'lIE TYl'ES IoIIl SI2E,. FCIlllNl'llWA1llJlM. PUlll'OSES au. M:T\JJIl.l'lPE OF 1lU, IREE
SHAP[,AlClCIlO'oECClMFlQ.RA1ICIIWAYVIfrtFllCllollC1lML~CQICII'llCIMS.NQ"IIMRNt1lEll
AIltlFlEDlllIECHlOlO1RttlllFtllWAllON.
~.
'"
..
BENCH \lARK:
USGSIEMOl-= U 1122
ELlVA'MII:>>I,401'ftT(ElE>M1IIlKRClTrllfaFERJllOllEN01_USll
IIROIQEllCiKll1'llPa'QNIATHI<<RTIfIIESfCOJltERfrHOUESIDllIllllNJMlDllENflA
ONIllIDPOINTOFaJlIIlIUIIlCAlOIlASl.
TITLE NOTE:
1lEl'DlENl:I:'lnU:1IEI'ORT:
""""'mil
toICM1'lS1'MY.SI1EIOO
-,,-
CRl(R~I1"'~-4A
0,I,1E:1lEl::&IEIl12,2llOli
~.
lW-!':lTI' ~I$ AM.
0.
.....
ooo
o.
0_
0_
.....
.....
.....Ill.-
"""""
STRUCTURE .. 1UOO so. FT.
IWlDSCAK . 38,700 SQ. fT.
TOTAl_ 56,iOO so. fT.
........,
S1'RlJC1'\M[ = 19,1OOt so. FT.
HNlOSCAPE .. 3B.3OOt so. rr.
mAL. 58,100t so. FT.
SURVEYOR NOTES:
UTIUTY NOTE:
1I€U1lnIESlNlIIION'llISFtMJlfEDUlMIIIWJUSJIlfAQECesOWiMNONLY. ACfUM.
LOCAlDIMDm.'fOCl1ID'" HMmG-f11Mt.lClldlllW.U1UlTUIlESNDT_
1lfI1It:S11t.Nf, :5tUU.lIEw.'IDIIMfmDIY1I€lXIIIlItACltRlUIIIO_COlCS1JlUC1Dl
BASIS OF BEARINGS-
MIlEAMtDNOImltwf:ltz~EAST(lf'M~'IEfllH:(lf'IlNlIAlIDRNE .o\SSIoIOCENlEJUIt
NllSAII8U.MCNiE. sao. (II lHATCDlIMAPMalYAPllECCJIllSI1t llOlJ(" 'I""
ATPAQE~ $lflTAQ.NU. aJlIrtlYRECGFlOS. WoIIS TMBt M 1ttE1MSlS OF lDllIGS 9lCIII' III
""....
III
II I
III
III I~ I
I gl I
1.1 I
III I
II I I
III
T I I
----n'--
II I
III
II I
III
I I I I
II
II
SHEET INDEX
.sIELIIII.
e-l
C-2
c-3
C-4
,-,
...........
TnlE SHEETfsm: PWl
1M"""""",,,,,,,
EIlOSIOllCOH11lOlI'UH
EROSIONCOIlTROt.DETiJLS
BEST IlIANMaIOO PRACTICES
PREWllNARY EAR1HWOIlK CIIJANlJTl[S SHOWN ON
TH[S[ PlANS ARE APPROXllIIAtt ESIIAATm QUANT1'nES
AND AJI[.F'UItMlSMED FOR TI4E CITY Dr CUPERTlNO'S
"FORNAIlOH ONLT. THE QtWf1111[S NAY[ IIttN
CAlGlUTm FROIIl EXmING GROUND El.[VA11llNS.
IIAS[D ON lOPOGRAI'MIC AND SlIMY AUP BY
aIIf'PElL SURVE'I'IfG SfIMCES. TO TME: GIWlES
SHOWN ON THESE IUNS. W1TH SJAIIWtO
A$SUMPI1CIMS. THE o\CTlJAL MIOUHT YAY VMY
OEPDIDI~ ON C(1MPACTION, CONSOIJOATIDN,
STRI'PlNGAHDTIt[~WE1ltClDOF
.....-
EARTHWORK SUWlMRY: cur 500 CY
fU ... C't
8ALAMC[ 350 C'f IMPORT
TOt.... MOVED 1350 r:t
.IIllIE:
JOPOOIAIIflIC SURVEY PDlFORUED BY CHJ.PPEU.r. SURVMNG
SDMCES ON ON FDIlUAR"t " 20CMi (APt! f:32ti-33-110).
~
l:!
~ ~
.0 _C!
~ - 'J~ t
~ ! ~~ ;
<0( (J ~ ~ 2'
~...::~
I~"'-r!..
~~~~-@
!: .!
g~O''C'i
~i!~e-
;i
(/)
I-
Z
W
:::e
W
>0
o~
o:::m
a.. < <
I- :::eNU
lU-z
lU <0'
J:Wl.&JZ
VI !::: 0 l- t]
V'l .fj ;:::
IX
'"
lU Zo.. ..
.: >- ill:J 0
'"
..
-O:::OlU ....
1-<("" ...
zo i:
Q
-- Z
:::e ~
.....J Q1
W ...
0::: ~
a.. 0
.i! I .! I
. ~
Q
I !I
.!
.!l
.
o
.!
i
i
SHm
C-1
OF 5 SHEETS
JO '-......
Jr
ljf"
1 ~
.,~ ~-
~ !r---: _1"_ ~_ Ni\J.l ~~
'e~~Ilr':: . rv .6. . pr.... .m' . ",.' ~. ~:.'f,~~
~ - -j--fiR';N~;;;; ~ 607."Jcm~...2>.=~ ~~. ga:~ ~
" E." < "" r "-"--;;::_ "-- ~ ----~~- j
Pi' " . . ".r_ '"~.., _ ~-. .!~.,:""; I' ~~~ .W' I
~' u ~~~~~~~~ ~ I
I I : : "-ipj f-."""" PQl l ~ I
~: " II : , I J J")... ......... !. } - ~___ " ~ -"
~~ ~ I .,..1 ~.~. "2SJ~,", I ~~'1 ~ _ 1&:' 1:&.0 ~f.l!'~l!'.IP"Il!'" I~r;
.z.p/1B-= ~ .",-_., I .... r.1!;, - ~ !"!"~/L,~ ~ I 1 ~
""'.. ," ~. _ ~ bEl 1 -" l' r= 'I"'; 1 I
".iN' tl".u: ."'~, -~----J 1---1 1M, I I II 1!'^.'
He ~.,.............~ r_ 1'9
r - 1l""-"''''iill' OI..lili'11ll" -'I... " \ "'.,,,,, .. 11"' " H;..,.f I I I
,.1'/; / . ''-+ \PWI ---- I I ,. V I I I I
He '11_' / ,~ A1'[ : Ill' \ fll.t' : I 11 I I I-
I 1M' 11 CllYSIDS.~ 1 6l' r::l.frNo'l "I
He- JJt:~9ffRf~ \6l' " 11 ~i?~~~/rt-~~. ~ i ~:l!"111!" I
Om" j J\."Ufl llI' J,j,,"7 '~"'- !"e',:;'.:;s:.r I ,i"" 1l" ~I I
1- He .. A '~1k...-4~~ ::: ' I 51 1
n_ /'.. t tl" '"," V ~ ~- I "'I I .
I .'-;;;J a<c I ;' llli..... '.~ := - I i:ll I~
~ ~ r i.!o. ~":.. I '/I"'" , -, o' "" I III
L'li/~~Co.~ - - I: u VI ~ 1:00- I '"'I I ~
~ i{, \'\1..._ ls3Jl.~. .,n~! iou ~
PARCeL 8 0 0 '(:1>".., I I I' P.U.F. I I I I
""..., .... 469 MAPS 39 ) ~ r~"'f "":. dt:. i!'" I jll'" I I!'" I'
... ~_~I A.P.N.: 326-33-110 _...... \i~V/ ~. !"' ~ 1 I I
~ tl" .-:J. ":'= ~ W' I 1 I I
7 "lot'\) \ ... ..E:...'l~. 1"1 [:".'1 xi ~ 1 I I I
~~^,[".,..I ,_ ~. 1 1 I
_~"~~~oW)'~' -.eft" I' ~~ I
"'-. ;t~~ .___. i!'.~.-!-....l!:'-~.~ I
.. :HY lIP' t-' .J62.OS' ,&;;'.;,.!" I .v'r '24"E I 17rJ....1 r
>> ~~OR~~'J'~~ ~:~:.. '~,': ~:: : : j
I PARceL A "J.,ALJ( CASEJJEN' AS I 1'5' J:!I I I I
I 584 MAPS 23&:24 SHOlIfI ON 584 . z_~ I I I I I
A.P./oI.: 326-33-114 I i I wt!
: 50'''.....'!! I~ I I I
:':,~~~ ,.. I I I I
1ffi/6O(X(T867, ORPG600 1 I I I
IAS.!itOIIH(M5tH1iI~~, ~
rer'.'''lF ILE III ~ '\""'" ~ I Bot I
k...x '!,o I "f""11!" I
lfflI'" ON ... . 2J<24jP,U.E i ,
I I I I I I 'I
if"'"
:c:
III~
-
Il"~. www . -~. . 'l:'
rofM} J" BffASS DISK
INIIONUItIENTIW.
"ary (IF CI,lPUff1liO. BAstS OF BCARfNGS
~@ r Fa.- -:- - --:- - --:- - B~~ B i~ ~~~.~
I ><11" ;y-r
-r ~\I :~~
I I'" """' ': ..;-,,-~,.~
/"---------------------~~.--~a:: ~~
, :I:'"
/ II
I
...ll .
.
.
I
I ~
il:
Q
I )..
I ...
5
""
~
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
\
1
I
I
;
'" ,
1
~ ~ .l I
I
l'"-1'" ~ I
d. ..,.-
~if~ . ,
. -
.
I
PAm A / r5-
469 lIAPS 39 w
A.P.N.: 326-33- 1)9' I +
," .
rl~~~~ ~ ~
i! !'! ,- :r.-rfl:_ 11.-
r\ ,.: u .- - '. i-....... -.,..,
<>-",T' ~ - ll;r ---""- .~~ - ,....
...... __L'- lR ~1 ~
'"~. ;:;; I ...Jf ':&~~::~iIf;i,---o
~rt'.:Z 11- +--~ LL
=~ .". it'"
........! ' ~
....
a" ,-..-
/II: IBll(tl..OOCDlS ~
~ _ ,l'!lN{
1Fi,ll'" ' l[b, _~"'F-~
"
-
_, ..1~
-
~ I!
r
. ..,.....
. ., P" .....
- """..
-. ......
"\ -
l[
r
rtl.
... ~1,5". 1MIt
1 ~ 1..
I
,..
.
_J.P
.
I
t1.__ L
I
I ~
1
I
REF,
I NORTH
I 0 20 '"
I I I
"U'H'" SCAlE
:\~ ,\ ""'"
\.~ \\~....
l!'"
CURVE TABLE
CUR~ RADIUS on TA 1H
cr 7J()(J' 6' .. "
ei 73.00' 16" " 7" 1. .
CJ 7' , '.f,'~ . 16.6"
C4 . r 47.14'
IMPROVEMENT PLANS
.scAL1l 1"=20'
~
~
" E
en 0
.
~2'3'~e
ffi ~.t.~:
:>01 ~
-Ct1~;~
~ . ~; t
i ~,t r!.&
0...:.... ....~
:t!E"lIf);;
g ~ o-O'~
",,:g:g!
....ID"-_O
;i
(/)
I-
Z
W
~
W
C/)>~
ZO....
-<( 0::: CD
-l (L<<
a..~NU
~z
f- <0
ZWllJ~
W 1-0-1- OIl
...,- '"
.c: (/) II:: >=
W 'llJei
> Zll.Q.
O>-I()::l ~
a::: O:::OlU -'
a.. <{-.t >!
Zo :t
~ - Q
_- :z:
~ ~
.....J
W
0:::
(L
~
~
o
~ I .! ~
~ ~
.
"
.
Q
.
<
.!!
i
'"
~
:z:
SHEET
C-2
OF 5 SHEETS
JO"": ..........
I
I
FOONO .r- SRASS DISK
IN iKWtbIENr IlEZL
-OW OF ctIPEIt7/N()-
o r=---=--~-----=--
I
I
~~------------------
,
I
I
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
ii:
"
>.
...
...
~
~
:
I
I ~
I
I REF.
NORTH
0 20 40
I I I I
CRAPlIC SCALE
____607.",~____- 1I5- -f-~
II -'" ! r?
-~ -------------r---
DftANC[ .r.. ! T
~~. ~~, ~
l"'l--~~~~ -? ~ 0-'"
,r" HC\ p ~~V~=~h .~ ~-~~--i I~ 1 & i: i
_ ~e; ",i \ .:;;7' i'~' I I I
'--~ ' t) ;! \ n i" ~ : : I'
.-1:m II ~ ,: ~8\Jj-/ : I I "I I
Y:,:r:VI-" - V ~~ J~/(~' idi f .!~!! I,
I ) -.i.-., I ~I ,~
"'" ~ e.._ l;r . 4 ~ ;;: I ,..
I ~_ ~,if .~:7~1 ~ II ~II II Ii
o ) 10'''''''~~
~'.;.!r'\ J91 I I I I "
\'-)5./ \\1 I I I
~ -/-" 1 \~I. I I I I
',~ I I I I
I I I
n , ~ :\ 1 11,,{l .~ I I I
~~'2'';' -, - - - -;;~ '-='-"" , =~f~::"'.rr ~ ~ ~...,~""L-;;a..L~ }
~ If.: I~-l '11;-~n~ ~~~~~ .~- .:~~: 'f:~ ',A i i i i
I PARC.L A "J..", EASElIEN' ..1 L.. I I I I
584 IIAPS 23424
A.P.N.: 326-33-114 "'7' cw 5<U u ~1 : I I I I
1 50' ....,...,<1 I ! I I I
:rr::.,~~ III,
I PER BOOK FlJ67. ORPG600 I I I I
I AS SHJrti CM 5lU II 2Jti4
(PORTION OF lEE ro TE Rf';j; ~
I " I I I
I ' I
STD<WAJJ("~".:'O' I I I I
l"""" CW 5<U · 2"f'r.IL< I I I II
'"
_OF..........
........... ~
USE AS -~1U.
9----cr31 ~$'~,. / K~ .
;S:, ~ ..~\ ~"'-l '~~
i . J fII.-~ '~... - ~.5~
--' -lll"'--Ir - l'J fiI~ -~-
"-- '::ljJ , ':1- c;...,....
~\ 'nl:l :;."'.... ~/~
'f ..\', COIISI1lIJCTION 'J: - _1 :
~ V I ENTIIAIKE :
i !J n r:::::\ _ n '
PNlCCL A ./ ~..... : r-*-J He
469 MAPS 39 ~: t
A.P.N.: 326-3]-1'rJs . I I,
'5 :~ -.. I
II rI/j :, i
'"
.
He
He
,
~:n~ ~l
,I
Ir
He
'Vi'!"..
/'<"
~ r-..v
'"
r---
II
<>
~:
I~: u
I II ~
.-ft ~
SlIlAW llOUS ~"" ! ._L__]______ --
AT SAwwr --l-
!j 4 .-'" '\ =..,
/T~T'<_, ~~ch~~
\W l~~'~~
,\\\ \\,\\\\\~\\\\\\
CURVE TAIlLE
GUR~ RAfJlIJS Ofl. 11\ [NG1H
CI 7. . 6' . 5- 7
C2 . rs'" r 21. .
CJ 57.00' 16'41'57- 1 "
e4- . 90 . r 4- 4'
~-
'-!:!/
7
\
l. \ I
l J
b
rowo COTICTI<TE:
IIaMtENT IN IJElL
Mr7HORILLHOI..E
~:-U) ~
!IO.'"
I
I
i
!
.
-
IIARIANI DRIVE
.
.n' ....
J...""'....../JAPS J9
~- ,.<---
..-
n
\:~~
PARCO/. 8 0
469 MAPS 39
A.P.N.: 126-33-110
a.J
\
\
JR[[ PRG1[
n
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND:
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
~ 1"=20'
-.----
-1_1_1-
~
STRAW ROLLS
SILT FENCE
ST ABlUZED CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
NOTE:
NO CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES Will BE PERMITTED
TO ENTER SITE BY WAY OF DE ANZA BOULEVARD
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) TO BE LOCATED ON'
MARIANI DRIVE ONLY.
l::
..
~
5 e
'" 0
o
w 2 :i'S' ~
~!~e~
> -
"I:(jCDOtgt
lil.;h
~~rlr!.&
o ~ ~~-@
>: Z .
:3 ~ ~Si
~i~~t
;II
10/
,
II)
I-
Z
W
Z~
-<( >0
-.l 0>
a.. ..J
a:::lD
-.l a.. <( <(
O:::!:NU
cr-Z
f-. <(
ZOWLoJ~
1-01= ~
o II) nO::
'LoJ '"
z Zo.. ~
o >-I/'):l f
- a::: 01 U
l/)<{'lt ;j
OZo >:
cr-.- !iE
Lu:::!: ~
---l
W
a:::
a..
0:
...
~
o
1 l j "
I: 0 l
l:!. .:l
.
..
0
Q
"
.
i
6
z
SHErr
C-3
OF 5 SHEETS
JOY: 08G18
WO:;J''''..UlelURDOOJ,J.,UodD ~
(XY,J) e..-,..,.-t.t"r (OlliS)
(131,) ~"-L>r (0..)
OJO"8 VO '3"YONmm8
lOt 311nS '3nH3AY a~Y"'OH OOZ'"I
S311113dOlld "'H ON'l'S :113141010
'9'0 'ONIHI3dno
a^18 '9'ZN'9' 3a oN S6VO~
SlN3~3^O~d~1 3115 ^~'VNIVtlIl3~d
S11'9'130 ~ S310N 10t/1NO~ NO/SOt/3
......
:./00$
BOZ/N/c
:.,oa .#1;tQ
"UClJ"'A.~
I ~ 8 ~ 8 ~i ~ Ii ~ "li~~ ~
II~I=! i i h h ~ ;i ~~ !~~II ;
!I~~!I! ~ ~ lli ;l il ~I I; i~ll!:1 ~
9 e!h ~ i ill! ~ _e ti~ ~~ ~~il ~!l ~
Is!iei ; I~ II :~ ~~ W! II ~~~~,,~ I
11~!lh ~ e~ 18 ~i~ 1m ~i n ~:!i Ii ~
i=l;I i ;i i111n: 1:1;; I;~n! i
I;;~b; Ii ~~ ~II!! ~;I!i !ili!~:
l8~5!i~! !l~ e ~~ ~ili d ~~~ i~ iil~~ e~ I
nhel~1 ~~ I! II ;.~;~ i;1 ii ~i~~ u ;
;~:~ .1: !~ :~ ~i !~~; ~- ~.. ~~~I U ~.
dl~l:i :; I~ ~d m ~~ i!! I~ d;~ ~; II
..; N ....t .,; ..; ...: 005 ... ~::
~ h I
I ~~ i
I~ i~
lini
~ iP;1
~ I~ lill ...J
I .~q~~ ~
o
z
o
i=
~~
~ i ~12
~ N a.. Ii
w
w
a::
I-
!l
i~li I. ij
/ ~I!~ iI 8~ =.
~,/ j!'< l! ~~ mli
, /' il;~e i i ~i
,~ i~~! ; 1m !i illl
18ili ~ ~~~~ ~R _1=
U;i I 7.~~; Illal i
!!~;il ~ m! ~I ~li ~
I :hU ~ m~ ~~ ~u @
af
- ~~
! lo~
t ~ ~
~
"....
:;
~e
~\+\\\
)" \ \ .
( \ ( )
l~ .. \ J
( ) /~
'-J -........,_ J ~
'\.___c..L_J
!I
i5
n
:l'
~~ !:~
~~~
U~
~
I
Ii
I ~ I w
" ~
I . ~ u
z
I I I~ I i <(
a::
--I l-
I eh I z
I w
I:; i :z
0 i
g i
;:! ~ := 12 II
eo ~ ~
e III !
i 0
II ! I u
c
~hil w
N
::J
iii
I ~ ~; !I ~ <(
, l-
I III
I
,
I
,
, .
~
o
0: B
~ ~
:= Ii
III
n ~ I ~. hi~ ~~i; h~ n~~~ ~
~ 111= ~ !; ~~I :~I~ :il ::1;8 i
IIj ~IIII !~ i~il ~~~i ~~I !!~~~I E
U~ e Ii. III ~j~ 4~~1 li~g i'8i!!
. u; 1;1 iil !~ ild il:~i ~i! I!i!; :
~~I I~~ ~ ~I Ii II ~e ~~~ a~ Ii ~
~~.. ;..; el ~~ ~Ih i~! ~II M hIli!! ~
~~i I!i II ii :~I~ I::!! !lli ~ Ij:U J
ill; r ~~ ill ~II! ;i;1 ~!c: 1;; !lid il
I i ~II :i ili ~~ ~ ;;I~ ~:: ! =12i~ j
ill !~I ~~ ;1 il:dl.II;~II~;~ ~ i;ii! : .
fj .I~ IIi Ii ~~I ~i~li ~~.~ 8 I~~e!ll ~i
h~ :!il II d ~!i~h ~lI~lii~ ~II~ ~ J~~~ ~~
..
...: Iii <Ii
i:
u ~ ~
~ . ~ Iii
iB~
i!;~ ~ i
I5l!;d
~ <: 0 ~
i: b: ~ u
g ~
... ~ ~ <# or)
8<<t~1
~ I III ..
u...",
'ClH 0 Q
...J
<
I-
.......
C
~ B
Z j;!
.......
.... Ii
':i
Vi
'IS '..l! v.. '0 t
.. .:. '0; i-;ot '2..; I .. Jo .
c:.. !~ -"i~":'" ..aol! ..1 i :t..- JE-l 8:;- .
Q :!,s ~~E ~ !':!:; i .:.~ ilut_ Ii ~i =-E~ Ii ... r'ii ~l:
H;Uih'li!. ~ i!~!; H i~ i{Hi H ii mu ii ii!i W'
.., ~';:i~ii!i~i! ~ iiijf it if :i!le !~ ~f L> li~ii Ii i! i~" iltl
a:: c Go :'.2J:i@:-:i~& : ;i~a 1-Z 1:= l;f:l :: Ji i ~;li! !~ 1.:1;;: tt!~
· 0 iW-:~!!~!.;i~g~ l 'O;i:~ :i.i ;i~~!__ =:1.:j I pi;~f sJ !~v ~~ i !l:r
E.- . ~~~-=8';;"c"'.g ... !Et.iE Iii ;1.: =~:~:J -i:~ I; ! ;!:je 1!,i Ii] oJ. -1(.5
... :.: ..'2....~C!.::. = :!_=o: t: ....i &OS"J= ....1. a ..._It. Iii. .::. j: r I"' ,.
>-Cl,C E.C.5.~~.!';S: ..:!i:f! =:.f!':!fil &:;i:i:::!ln :i !!S:li l~il
>.-.. o%:;~~::!_~~! lillJl.::t;~IE:;!~~-~!!~~;tJ;:i;;;il:: .;;:;;: ;~18
Ill. :.:. ;; ~ ii~:iiii~ li f:;!,ij ;. Iii [Iilil .:ti .~f ~ ! ifi!!i i1 !si if i !iis
., ..., -i5~l!!~;SJCI"._ ca.. .-..... 2:: ... III.
... .... 0'" 0 as o! 117- E!!:l ~." 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 CJ 0 0 0 0 CI
... Q;..G"a.._~.. (I)
~
ni
U, i
.. .:il(- ~
I '~~
I~f 0
",,,..,. I
'{ ",", 'I~
~
Df:l
2
!:l
:1
O~
i
..,s Ii
-I s: I!
CD J! ::Ii 0010
"''''e.2lg,Eeo
. ! _I! .. a.'" .
lI'w -.2&.".... II
.5~,'" INJI',sc:ioo
CI). oo_a.O>=
~::I - -.N
1D0 tjl!!iJ"cIl..
_...0 0."0
-..f.=:II.........
.... ..O,!! 0
EN. .. CI"E :a = ....
CD'u~h:;!.'I:g...
:r -c.-.U
.. ""
"!I-I!
m=o.
illHil'l ..'11 jag Iii f 1{.1 bt-
jl!Ht~~;: t ~ I.IIU bal~~!:i: iiilfdift'U
'S 001 i; . . i Z i "I Z e . I Ie '.1 i..
e 0 III _" 0 0 0 " 0 "" 0
I i III 1 Ii! I h t!. h l
it I .Ii II !iijill iU! Ii Ie
H I In d N1JI'! II!! d if
J Ji II 11' UJ tUhil!s iilllH II
f !!!i ~lij 111 !Umlu ~d !h!i
~" ! I 'I hi
i~~ IU 1U!h
(,,) 0 ~ .5 U lJ1J!11
.c2= .!i8~ l.!il'i~
II) '1:J Q. I!! I f hi
.t: li,t .II.. hI H"
fillllj
I liJ.jtit
~ I. aat
j r iHti1h
ii! 1!If.t11
.!l,a I~jlhj
h Ihfrdl
11.11.il~~1 t
f I II f~1 1
II.iJ Ihb)l If
rJ! 1I11ill 1(
f f J11hal!. Ii
f !U. !"iinl !i
CD
C
'~ I
:E-
.~
.c~
1:1:;
:le
It~!. l! tIt II .
!Il .~ I 1 I!
I i~.!UI! I .1.1 Ih Ii
I}iiilti h Iii! lit Ii
lutwti Ii hI! uH Ii
J !Ihtdl !i !Ih !hf !I
Ifl'I.1~.) ;, ill 1 i i lit :1
~t tii!l~ f," il", II Nt. il.
I ~!2 . . J I I ,!i Ii
Jli.;
I! '!i HI
:,.-"j Ii! fi~
I I j!I'lti
HII!!!l Ii
i dlUlh
I d'lii
~ J [itfd"
-Ii 1 1'"1'
IS j flla!11
I mifh
dill If lii ilU il itl i~ i
flf if Ii lu hI! If II. Ii!
I Ilil !ft III llllllillll'~ Ilfl
i i.II U!,lg il!
f.. -Is Iii
J f ffll hUhl1
l'I,.lHI! J':1
!. !U. !uh !Iii
U)
IAI
(,J
-
~
U
~
D..
I-
Z
IAI
:&
...
"
C
Z
C
:IE
I-
U)
...
m
z
o
-
~
u
::>>
a::
I-
U)
Z
o
u
4 11 f '"II("ill IIi
Ii I Ii! Ih
1 If. filII dUl1iR
h f I PMlliljli!I!II,
! ==
, . .
. ~ :.
i ~ ~E
. "II~!~!
: "''; z to :o.~
.&l Q I. : l! !:;
t::i: 8:: ,; :;:::.
::':f-i f!.i! ! :~ ii
~~:tl:; ~:.; :; ~:;~:
t:5:5 ~!: : :.5~:
. . ;II.
U . U .
~
.
.
, -
eo j _
, . ~
I ~ ClIO
. . .
; ~ ~
" . -
" - "
" . ,
o : 1:
J "l' !
J ... :
. .
}h
ei>
..g
..-:j e!g~
i:i; ~ .
~ gAl
~ ~;-
=-=-:' _-=---=-=---==--=-="..==-L
MARIANI AVENUE df
~V\ rflT r4}--- ~--~-._~----~-~-
~I .~~ Q/ ~ ----- ~ ._ - "\ ~
- T ( Y ) (7 ~"Y.'. - --l'\':?::~.:w;::.:. ~~ N
- -< - _n---rf-_n---- -- -- ",,' f<C~::7::.~
I I
I I
I'
<<r-
t'--'^-.~
~
y ~.n"":n. ~
_~~~~_~~~" ,_ ~ '''':B -)~ ~J-
''>:J>N-"''''';',;;;, ~ _. 1-_ _ __ _ n__~ _+_ _
,n ! i I ~
t1n, ~ ,
. ""Fl. ., "'NES PlNill:D AT ,
../ ,BASE OF ALL WEST ,
-I--T~ .! COlUl,tNS PO " J
~.=t i =PiI
/ ~=rr :
; r I He
) ~--<.. :
, ~
,
- I
,
__. _. I
,
,
,
,
I
,
Tl'"
..n I EDGE Of ..
. , -
'--, ., DECK
I IW:M. RANI'
I '1. .:~ _NY:Nf
~~: L y. " / I ~,,;1JIj
\. --_/ TURN-
t+-- ' 11_ lIP "'1.. /' ARaJNO
/- .'...~ ~/~f \':l; '\ ~
j .. . . ...tW.
"~-~~-^-'--....::/--'~J'.....::P.......~ -, I /
.
OFfICE
..'1--
(El
E.\SEIlENT
N::CESS~
~'I
\
-.
He
"---
-.
~
Plantin
m&I.
"""""'"
"'"
.."'.C...._
--
""'"
..
'"
2"-8DJ: ~'tiknla'-muItI
HOeo. CeR:tlCIliIIlOdWII'Fu.tr-t
to ~ ~)b 0lRtnA 'bel SW
24" 80x P)I'U* c. 'Chclntlcleer'
~ClrnlIIrI<<ItdP_
- .....
.......-
No_""
'"
PC
SS
~4.b Sequolo..-smp..'.SI_
--
""""
...
5 Gd. Abutlon 'Uoonbeam'
--
01
...
S Got. C1h1a mlnlota 'Sctomanl H)trid'
V"I<afl;oUy
& Col. D,,*-,1oI antartlocJ
T-"lInm TrMFem
LO
. ...
Loropet........ch/nftIIs'P\um'
W)tlca ~a1ffi;miOo
NCIIIdIno d. 'Gulf Str<<Jm'
FI'tI'I' 110M"
pQQfte WolI N)fUt:
GulfStreorrl HlIO'MlIyBamboo
IlC
,.,
PT
. ...
. ...
. ...
Pttto.pon.omtoblra~
R~~m'lft1or'
Ro.rnarlnU8o.'Tu.:an~'
-,-
Dwcr1y..tIn1tIorn
Tu_ au. R~
Fl'Of'O"tSaroacoccor
"'" "--"
...
Of
...
..
....
....
, ...
, ...
--
W6ItmOiO fl'vt\tQawn
He
He
I
[,..1
.
.....
"
--w
-
!-1];['-
V "
La
f-.
. ~-
r
7@
0<-
",
,,--
."
r
....l.
""""
""""""'"
""
EIOTAMCAlIWIE
'"
...
LP
..
..
'"
""
""
"" J
1 Gal. UInknO m. "F'urpte'
leal. ~stoechClll
1Gal l.hIGIllum~
1 Gal. lIIIIcQlthUl .1rMnaII 'ZItmuI'
5Qct. Qphklpogon)lilllran
lCal. PennIilomIm
5GcL Phormlllm'Du.t'
5 Gal. Phomlklm 'Bronze Baby
5~. PIIornlIunl'tluayOllft'
~ Gal. PhomIlum 'Platt'. Bode'
"" .
..
1 Gal. SGMG IeuolInt/lO
--
t=:)
, ...
COrreo p. 'DuIk)o ....
GrnIlea\owForm'
,...
,...
,...
,...
--
~o.'HuntklQlOnc.pet'
-.......-
...
~. by PodIc Sod
.
""
\JJ~
..,.:..;.,;.
'~?~;." .
',. ~~/
'. e.. ..;
. . .
.........1A....
"::;::;;",,;' ;:;
'I{.:, ..
f << .;.
I :
! !
I
I
',' .,
.. /~!,-..~~~.. ::'~.
.~': ..'. . .,
.;....
,I......
:Y;;'
'{ I
., .1..
o. 'I'
<;>>.:r:; ,_
'<>::C~:I
......1.....
;T':
"^ "<<:.......
"'\ I;,>
.}~~;:;
~ .~ ~~7.
. J ... U for ~;;r< J
'".~ r~ ''''U' O<~ .... ',..~, ^ .,
1511 's" "" ,11> ..~ lS'D ! r \ :0,: fob
,...J'\__r'~ ~.~,~~ --..r-- -i-,
. I I)
". ,
....
w""',
'':':-:, . .
./ ..~~:;j~~:} \1::...
. ......' ".. .... .,,:\ \'
,". ::,.:~.:-;.. " '.:J1>",,'
h .::,:::::~
.. ..:/
-
)t,(
\JJ
e.
~
"
e.
II
D
n
.....-
""""".....
""",,"IS
TrahI9Lfn'-
--
...-
.--
...,~
F__
'''''''''''
'''''''''''
"""'''''
'''''''''''
-""
-"'-
--
......-
"-"'Y
Fm_
4'M.~
'Sc.c.~
18"o.c.~
2'o.c.1!XICh9
2'o.c.1flOCkla
Toll fetWt
,)II< .....
/J~OI:NIZo\"'dl.
""""""'.."""
.-'
i
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I'..."".., .!
"",--,' Q
>1
;J
III I
~I
~I
Q
:rl
~I
~I
I
,=" 1
1
I
I
I
,
\\
General Notes
1. -Green or Sustainable Landscape':
Q. lOtld9cope walls to be eMstruetad of recycltd (Iggregate with 'TreK'
venw to match the bundlng,
b. Majority of the De ArIza entry paml will be imper~OI.ls to allow rain water
to percolote bocl< into the groundwa /!It' toble.
c. Landscape heoderboord between paviBg and planting to "' 'Trox' recycled
plastic' and wQO<:j fiber or approved equal.
do Reuse of the numerous existing lonclscope boulders OIl site.
e. All plants and planting areas ore to be amended and mulched with rec}<:led
wood from BfI Organics (ycI"d trimmings and wood WQste) or approved equol.
f. 90% of the seteeted p10nta (Ire dossified oa 'IOow water usoge' by the State of
California, Deportment of Watel' Resources (WJCOLS).
9- All trees and shrubs will be watered by 0 10. volume or drip irriqotion s)'8tem.
2. Pro~e a mininum 3" layer of ree}ded wood muld'1 within e)listing tree driplir'les.
The orea 5' from eoch tree trunk Is not to be planted, wattre<l, nor " any
trenching allowed.
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Scale; 1 n = 20' - 0"
TO
'"'''''''''''
lIIIDc ..........h.__
~
Greg G. Ing
&, Associals
,..".-
15Sn.~Sdt1m
Sm,-CalibBII.llm6
...... -
~
~
Df r>olP"./
Rev.
Date
M2t1O&
.m/<X1
512t105
613O/OS
ARCH.fI.IlC.~
DDIGN SUMITtAL
OOlIGNRE'o'I!JONS
PGEB#<
ny Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
DlllWingTdIe
Conceptual
Landscape Plan
Job'
Dote,
Selle:
Drawn By:
Sheet
Al0165
32906
AS NOTED
CL1
""_........-......._.._.......~. ...
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM
Application: Consideration of cancellation of the August 8, 2006 Planning
Commission meeting.
Agenda Date: July 11, 2006
DISCUSSION:
Since the City Council has canceled its August 1,2006 meeting, the Planning
Commission may want to consider canceling the August 8, 2006 Planning
Commission meeting to accommodate vacation schedules. Currently there are
two public hearing items on that agenda that would normally be heard on
August 8.
The two items are for a use permit for a new 1,180 square foot commercial/ office
building and three residential units located at 21761 Granada Avenue, and an
appeal of an approved residential design review for a new, two-story 3,725
square foot residence located at 10535 Cypress Court. The applicants have been
contacted and the use permit applicants are amendable to an August 22 meeting
date. The applicant for the Rl appeal just informed staff that he will be out of
town for the month of August. To be sure the applicant is available, the
application should be scheduled for the September 12 meeting.
The Commission should vote on cancellation of the August Planning
Commission meeting, if it so chooses.
Submitted by:
Approved by:
Ciddy Wordell, City Planner _. /fJ
Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development ;;;Yt1/-e 1/;. _1/2 /1
<.- V-.L....!,;r-"c//!,,!
CL-i)
G: \ Planning \ PDREPORT\pc\2006 \ cancelsummennee ting. doc