Loading...
Reso 286 � � 80,000.6 File No.: 15-Z-65 RESOLUTION N0. 286 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO D�PdYING THE GRANTING OF A ZONE CHANGE, from R-1:B-2 to R-,1., and change of location of a park area zoned R-E:B-�. AFPLICANT: Proud Homes, Inc. and Louis A. Paganini ADDRESS: 164 North Bascom Avenue, San Jose, California SUBMITTED July 12, 1965 �� ; LOCATION: South of Stevens Cre�ek Blvd., east of Blaney � Avenue - at Price Avenue. �. � AREA: R-1:B-2, 17..5 acres; R-E:B-�-, 5.1 acres (continued from page 1) . � F�JRTHER FINDINGS : � 1. Lay-out of Portal Avenue & Vicksburge Drive: encourages th�rough traffic, which wou�.d be dangerous to childr�n visit�ing the.park. ; ., 2. The revised shape of the park is too narrow to _ allow efficient use of �he p.ark, DENIED this 26th day of Ju:l.�r, �965, at a regula.r meeting of the Planning�Commisaion of the City of Cupertino, State of Cali- fornia, by the followin� roll call vote: � AYES: Commissioners Frolich, Johnson, Traeumer, Gates NAYS: None ABSENT: Commissioner Hirshon APPROVED: Jack Gates Chairman, Planning Commission ATTEST: �� � ! r � .. ' ���� �- �.. � ��'t/Vt �. Adde Laurin Director of Planning -2- C I T Y 0 F C U P E R T I N 0 City Ha11, 10321 South Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road Cupertino, California 95014 Telephone: (408) 252 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DENYING THE GRANTING OF A ZONE CHANGE. WHEREAS, the attached application has been submitted to the City of Cupertino reauesting a change of zone in the zoning regulations of the City, as stated on page two, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application on the date as noted on said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has duly considered and heard all evidence submitted in regard to said applic�t'i`on and ' WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the zoning ordinance of the City of Cupertino. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Planning Commission finds that the proposed zone change does n�t meet all of the follov�ring requirements : a. Encourage the most appropriate use of land, b. Conserve and stabilize the value of property, c. Provide for adeauate open spaces for light and air, d. Permit adequate control of fires, e. Promote the health, safety and public welf are, f. Provide for the orderly development of the City, g. Be advantageous to the property and improvements in the zoning district and neighborhood in which the property is located. (continued on Page 2)