Reso 281 80,000.6
File No.: 1�-V-65
- RESOLUTION N0. 281 �
OF THE PLANNING C4MMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING
THE DENIAL OF A VARIANCE for advertising displays on light standards
in Portal Plaza Shopping Center. '
�
APPLICANT: National Advertising Company
ADDRESS: 1661 Industrial Rd., San Carlos, California
SUBMITTED: June 17 1965 ..
LOCATION: Northeast corner of Portal Avenue and Stevens Creek Blvd.
ZONE: - . C-1-H
{continued from Page 1) . .
FINDINGS :
1. It is the philosophy of the City of Cupertino
that advertising si�ns of this type do not
. improve the appearance of the city, and do
not further its development. . : � �
2. The gign does :�ot �mee�•-the -�requi rements of the
Sign Ordinance.
DENIED this l�.th day o�' July, 1965, at a. regular meeting�of
the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino,.State of Calif�rnia,
by the following roll ca11 vote:
AYESs Commissioners Frolich, Hirshon, Johnson, Traeumer, Gates
NAYS : None
APPROVED:
Jack Gates
Chairman, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
�c�c� Gw��i�
Adde Laurin
Di.rector of Planning
-2-
C I T Y 0 F C U P E R T I N 0
City Hall, 10321 South Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road
Cupertino, California 9501�
� Telephone: (�08) 252-�5�5
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECONIlvIENDING THE DENIAL OF A VARIANCE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino
received an application for a VARIANCE, as stated on page two; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has NOT met the burden of proof required
to support his said application;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application does
NOT meet all of the following requirements:
1. That there are special conditions or exceptional character-
istics in the nature of the property to be affected, or that its
location, or its surroundings are such as will permit the Commission
to make � determination that a literal enforcement of the Ordinance
would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships; and
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the
preservation and,enjoyment of substantial property rights; and
3. That �he granting of the appl3.cation wi11 not materially
affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working
in the neighborhood of the property which is the subject of the ap-
plication, and that the use of said property in the manner which it
is proposed to be used will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the �alue of property or improvements
located in said surroundings;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and
other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the
VARIANCE be, and the same is, hereby NOT recommended for approval to
the City Council of the City of Cupertino; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the findings quoted above and on page two are approved and
adopted, and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to notify
the parties affected by this decision.
(continued on page 2)