Loading...
Reso 244 �-- File No.: 1-V- RESOLUTiON N0, 2�+�- OF THE PLANNING CGMMT.SSI�N O.N` 'I':iC C:�'I'�T OF CUPFRTINO R�COMN�NL�INQ 'I'I-iE DENIAL OF A VARIANCE for a�5 � r.l.;h sign. APPLICANT: Mr. Itsuo Uenaka ADDRESS : c% Ad Art, Inc ., P. 0. Eox 6�l8, San Jo se, Culif . SUBMITTED: JanuarY 5� 7-965 LOCATION: Springdale Nursery at Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd. continued from Page l) FURTHER FINDIN(�S : That, by granting variances such as applied for here, the � intent of the Sign Ordinance would soon be destroyed. DEZJIED this 8th day of February, 1965 at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of Califarnia, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commiss�.oners Frolich, Hirshon, Johnson, Sma1l�Traeumer, Gates NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST c APPROV�'D : / ."��� r �-L''. '� r'`� i , 2: , r Adde aurin Jack Ca es City and Traffic Planner Chairman, Planning Commission -2 - C S T Y 0 F C U P E R. T I N 0 Cit�T Hall, 10321 South Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road Cupertzr.o, Calj.fornia 9�01�- Telephone: (�08) 2�2-Zl-505 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNIivTG COMMISSInT1 0� THI: C:CT`� OF CUPERTINO RECOT+2MENDING T�-iE DEN�:AL OF A VARl'ANCF . WHEREAS, the Planning Comm:iss:ion of the City of Cupertino received an application for a VARIANCE, as stated on page two; and WHFREAS, �he applicant has NOT met the burden of proof required to support his said application; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application does NOT meet all of the following requirements: 1. That there are special conditions or exceptional character- istics in the nature of the prop�rty to b�: affected, or that its location, or its surroundings are such as will permit the Commission to make a determination that a li�eral enforcement of the Ordinance would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships; and 2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; anc? 3. That �he granting o� the application will not materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or warking in the neighborhood of the property which is the subject of the ap- plication, and that the use of sa3.d property in the manner which it is proposed to be used will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the value of property or improvements located in said surroundir�s; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful conside� ation of maps, facts, exhibits and other evidence submitted in this matter, the a�plication for the VARIANCE be, and the same is, hereby NOT recomrn�:nded for approval to the City Council of the City of Cupertino; and BE IT FURT��R RESOLVED: That the findings quoted above and on page two are approved and adopted, and that the Secretai°y be, and is hereby, directed to notify the parties affected by this decision. (continued on page 2)