The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 03-12-69 CITY OF CU�ERTINO� State of California 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California Phone: 252-4505 PC-8 80,000.� MI1W'rES OF TIiE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION H�LD MARCH 12, 1969 IN THE COUNCIL CFIAMBER� CITY HALL� CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Vice Chairman Hirshon,c�ll - �o or��r who subsequently led the assemblage in the flag salute. fla� salut� Commissioners presents Irwin, Buthenuth, Hirshon. Absente Commissi- oners Puetz and Frolich. Also presento Senior Planner Laurin; City roll c�.11 Attorney Anderson; Recording Secretary Lucie M. Matzley. Senior Pl�nner Laurin reported th�t he was in receipt of a written communication directly related to Application 4�Z- The Commissi- �itt�n oners ��reed t'h�t this cor►ununication be read in canjunction wi�h communic��on the hearing of the m�tter. There were no oral communications. no ora1� Public Hea�rings A. 3mZ- Claude T. Linds��r. Rezoning from Single�F�snily �m�m6 Agricultu�°al-Residential lm�cre lots (A1-�+3) �o �ingle legend family Residential 7500 sqofto �ots (R1-7.5) �pproxim mately 1.9 acres located west side of Bubb Road be�ween Re�nar� Road and Conradi� Court. First Hearinge Mr°s. Juanita Mc:Lar�n, Realtor, made the presentation and st�tec�. that present��.on this w�.s a very small parcel of land. A member of the �udience, Mr. Disser of Re�nart Road, voiced hi� �udience objection� to wh��t he termed o 'wall to wall houses" that would ensue objec�ion if �his app].ic�tion were approved. Commissioner Buthenuth moved, Commissi�ner Irwin seconded and �t was p.h. passed unanimously to close the public hearing. clo�ed Commissioner Buthenuth moved for approv�l of Application 3-Z-69 with 3�Z-6 the 12 St�nd�,rd Conditionse Commis�ioner Iz°win secondedo �pproued Ayes< Commiss�oners Irwin, Buthenuth Hirshon Noese Non� Absent o: �p�ri�i��ioners Puetz and Frolich. B. �±mZ- o Russell T�. Holcomb; Rezonin� �mz The �,pplican� w�.s no� in the audience. Mr. Don Bandley, Realtor, stated that this applica,tion was directly related to the followin� expl�n�tion listed agenda item and suggested its hearing. I � page 2 Minutes of tr.P Fl�nnin� Commission March 1.2� �96g PC-$ 80,000.4 Applicat�on �+-�Z�-69 cont�d matter Commissioner But�nenuth moved, Co�i�sioner Irwin seconded and it was deferred passed unanimou�ly to uaove on �o the next item listed �n t�e agenda. 5- z-69 C. 5 -z-69 0 Don 0 Bandley; Rezoning from Single�F�mi�y Re�z- legend den�Gial 10,000 sq.ft� lot,� (R1-10� and Singlr:-family Resi� dential Agr�cul�tural 10,000 5q�fto lots (Rl-l0ag� to Planned Development (P) for eommercial u�e approx�mately 15 acres loc�.ted northwest corner of Stevens Creek Boulev�rd and S�elling Road. Fir�t He�,ring. Mr. Bandley made the presentation rei�teratin� that t�is application was to have followed Application �+mZm further, th�t time was of present- the essence in connection w�.th the application he presenteci> According ation to Mr. Banziley re�onin� �pproval af some 15 a�cre� was s�ugh� �t this time, to be followed by a request for rezoning of some �3 �cres loc�.ted in th� same vicinity. Mr. Dennis Burrow, the architect far �he project e�cplained the proposal by the use of architectur�l rer�derings stating t�a� the �°eq�zest w�s being made on beh�.lf of the Saich family which �nvolved several indi- architect vidual parties �o the 38 �cre� parc�l. Mr. Burrow sai� th�,t there was explains a need fo�° addi.tion�.l Pl�nned Dev�lopment (P) �onin� and that a development proposal had previo�u�ly been pre�en��d which had be�n unacceptable t� the Pl�nning Commis�iono T�ie �,pplic�nt maintain�d °��at tY�e current application was similar in size and d.e�i�n to ��hat p�°eviou�ly s�abmitted on b�ehalf of �he Eup�rat family ��m�t�me in 19660 Mr. Burrow �xpl�ined the plans in deta�l and answer�ed que�t,ions a.s questions posed by the Commissioners �.nd the S�nior Planner. �� was vointed answered out that this plan w�s prelzminary in n�.�ure and was al1 that is requested by the Planned Development Ordinance at t�iis ti.m�. Senior Pl�.nner Laurin st�.��d t�h�t the control� �he C�,ty �xercise� are the statement same in a Planned De�relopment zone fo�° commercial �z�� a� in a General Commercial zone. More di�cussion ensued among the Commis��i�n�r� an�. t�e S�nio�° F�anner. Commissioner Bu�henuth fe1� �that t�� C�.��r wou�cl �a�r� 1.��`�.e to say about the propo�ed use a� long �,s i� was comp��i.bl� to t�ne zoning and re�t�ined a commercial u�ea City Attorne� Ander�on ��r�ed �1�ating discussion that the Use Fermit precedes th� B�zilci�.n� Permit and that �tlh� real_ problem f�.ein� tlhe st�ff would be �o c�rreetly 1c�c�,te :�r�era�. Comm�� c��.l. (CG) and Adm�ni�tr��,tive and Pr�ofes�ion�.l Off�ce� (OA) are�,� °w:��,n the P�ann�d Development� (P� zone. When V�c� CYiairm�.n H�,�°�hon called for �.u�li�nce comment�, Mes�rs m Norman audience Stei,n of 209�+8 A1ve� Dritre and B�.11 Disser asked que�t�ons rElative to questions the application �11 of° raY�.ich wer� an�wer�d by �he �,pplicant t,hrough the Chair . communica- Vice Chairman H��shon �.1so r�ad the written commlznication which wa� in tion read opposition to �Ghe p�°opo�al. Minutes of the Pl�nning Commission March 12� 1969 PC-8 80,000.� 5-Z-69 cont'd Pa�e 3 City Attorney And�r�on again ca�ationed that an approval of the plan would con�titute the approval of the commercial zoning on that counsel corner and th�t the applicant would only need to return for approval cautions of a Use Permit if he so desired. The applicant m�intained that this application w�s purely tentative and that the Pl�nning Commission, if they approved the �pplication would approve the commercial nature of �he corner but certainly not the proposed uses for the individual parcels. Ci�y Attorney Ander- �tatement son requested that this st�tement be included in the official r�quested record and that, upon approval, the motion should be worded to the included effect that the approval is not �n approval of any specific use and not an approval of a Use Permit for a gas station. Commissioner B�t�enuth moved, Commissioner Ir�vin seconded and it w�s 5�z-69 unanimously approved to close the first hearin� on Application first hearin� 5-z_69, closed Vice Chairman Hi��hon advised the members of th� aud�ence �hat this matter would be listed on the agenda for the next meetin� a� havin� expl�nation been continued from tonight's meeting. A recess w�s called at 9030 P•m• recess The meeting reconvened �± 9:40 p.m. B. 4mZ- Russell�,. Holcomb; Rezoning from Sin�le-family 4-Z- Residential 10,000 sqaft. lots (R1�10) to Multiple Hi�h- legend Densit,y Residenti�,l 2200 sq.ft. minimum (R3-2.2), approx- imately 22 acres located west side of Stelling Road, 860 feet north of Stevens Creek Boulevard. First Iiearing. Mr. Herman Chri�tiansen, Jr., member of° the firm owning the ��.rcel of l�,nd, ma.de the presentation stating that ot�er are�,s in the same nei�hborhood had been zoned for hi��-density residential, and that the traffic �ene�°�,tin� from this devel.opment weuld not adversely presentation effect the existing traffic. Also that the rezoning request wa� a logical one as there would be no additional burdens placed on existing fa,ci�ities in the area� and sanitar3r faciliti�es were ade- quate fox° this type of development . Mrs. Anne An�er� a member of the audience, stated that she was not a�ainst the proposed development per �e� but questioned the guaran� audience tees the City would impo�e in connection wi the proposed apartm comments ments and their actual construction. page �+ Minut,e� af t:n� .F°�.�,nri�g Co��:��o� Mar�� :�2� �969 PC-8 80 , 000 . �+ 4mZ�6g cant � �1 ThA applican� ��,t,�� r�t �, �i�:�ral��rn�r�t, plan wo�;xl� b� �ubmit�teci �,�; a �-�.t�x� �,a.m� a.nci �ugg��,�d t�:a�t Y�r� r��c��ng �-qu��f �� .m�ncl�� w�th the statem�n� con3ition '��h�,�t � d��r��opm�nt p��n b� ��zb��t��3 ��r to t:�� q�a��t requested for �. bu��d.�n� permit. �xic� C�,�.srr,�.n �i::x��ior? z^�q tk�� t��4 inclucled st�temen� by 't�� .pp�i,can�� `�� n��a �n �T�.��v �r�eo��. so t'ha� no � buildin� pe�n�.t ��all be �,��;z��1 �r��,�v�° �� r�e �ubmi��ie�n of ��ie �e�relop- ment p��.n . p. �. Comm��sion�r B�z�,�ienu°�h mo�r�d� Coanm�.��ioner ��°�a�n s�ecn�i�d �.nd it w�,s closed pa��ecl. unarb:�mmcu�ly �� los� iG�e pu�li.c '��.rin�. 4_ z-69 Gommi��oner Bu��l�nut� mov��l io� �.ppr��.� of �,pp�ic�.t��n �+mZ� approved with �he l� Sta�J.�,�°d Cond�ts�n� ws°��. °�� .�3di�,ion�.1. c�ndi�i�n 13) that with tk�e devel.apmera� p��..n be subm�t��. ta� �;�ie �lann�ng Comm��ion prior conditions t� �he �,��u�nce of a bu%lclin� pex°mi� . Comm��one� Ir�a�n �econded. Aye� o Comin�.��ione�°s I�ix� Buth�enut�� H3�°�non No�so None Abs�n� o Gomm�,��one�� Pu�tz �.nd F'x°��i.��. There w�,� n� unfi,nish�d bu��n�s� � no:� �a�s - �Y��re �,ny n�w bu�in�ss . adjournment The C�i�.ir de�c.l�.x°�cl °��h� m��t;ir�g a�ijournecl at 10aQ� p.m. 64PPRO�JID e } �� . � � � �._.._._, ATTESTo r f�� Jack T. �iirsh�n �Tice � Gh�irman PLAIVNING D�PAR'�NIENT /� �i ' �/l <�C�1�- C� i�LV�vI �n Senior� Pl�,nn�r