Loading...
PC 01-27-69 CITY OF CUPERTIN0 State of California 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino� C�lifo�ni� 9501� Phonea 252-�505 PC -3 80,000.4 M�NUTES OF THE REGU7�AR MEETING OF TIi� FI,ANN�N�° COMM�SSION HELD JANUARY 27, 1969 IN TI� CO�YNCIL CHAMBERS C�T�.° �IAI,I,� CUPERTINO� C�iY�IFaRN� The meetin� was called to order at 8005 p.ms by Chairman Frolich, who call to order subsequently led the assembl�,ge in th� fl�g s�.lu�e. fla� salute Commissioners presento Irwin Hirshon, Buthenuth, Pue�z, Fr�olich. Also present: Senior Planner Laurin; Assi�t�nt P1.anner Eng; Directo� of Public Works Finney; City En�ineer Boyd; Recor�in� S�c�re�tary Lucie M. Matzley. Since Chairman Frolich had not had �n opportunity to �tudy the minutes minutes of January 13, 1969, Co�runissioner Puetz moved Commissioner Irwin approval seconded and it was pas�ed unani.mously to po�tpone approual of these postponed minutes to the next regular meetin� of t�is Commi�sion, Senior Planner Laurin reported th�.t th� City Council inad continued deliberations on the revision of the General Pl.an fo�° the E4 01d Monta notice of Vista" area to th�ir February 17 �g6g m�eting. The applicant for postponement Application 2�+-Z-68 had been asked if he w�s agree�.ble to an �,dditional delay and had replied in the affirmative. Accordingly Commissioner Iz°win moved, Commissioner �iirshon seconded 24-Z-68 and it was passed unanimously to continue discussion of Application continued 2�+-Z-68 to the February 2�+, 1969 meetingo Upon a question by Commission�r P+xetz, Ch�irman Frolich explained the City Council's reasons for the continuance of the discussion on the - General Plan. Mrv Laurin stated that the Council h�d instructed him to reasons review the entire matter in conjunction with prote�ts brought b2fore defined the Council and report back on F��ru�.ry �7� 1969. Senior Planner Laurin stated that he h�d submit�ed a memorandum to the City Attorney requesting an int�rpretation of a�pecific Ordinance section in connection with Application 28-TM-68. Attorney Anderson reported that a remark had been made relative to w�ether lot splits written should be requested for �.n apartment lease anfl defined that a parcel communication of land may have natural b�rriers, or pareels of land m�y have been created by artificial means, ioeo purcha�e or sal� of land from one owner to another. Thus, the treatm�nt of a piece of land should be legal clearly defined in all cases and instances. Atto�^ney Anderson stumned definition up his rese�,rch by stating that th� City �hould not require a Tentative Map if the use of a l.ot is homo��niou�e There were no oral coirununications from the audienceo no orals Chairman Frolich stated that the news medi� had recently published an article by which a possible Macy's development was all but completed research and instructed staff, for the px°otect,ion of the City, to research requested this matter and report back to the Commissiono � � page 2 � Minutes of the Planning �ommiasiQn �T�n�aary 27, :�9�9 PC-2 80, 000 . �+ Public Hearings 24-Z-68 A. Application 2�+-Z-68 �ad prev��ousl� `been po�tponec� tc a later postponed meeting. �9_�_(g B. 29 Manuel Ma.rchanto Tent�.ti�re Nlap� V�riance to 1_V_ 'T exempt 1,224 acres located on the north side of Lindy Lane, legends approximately 100 feet west of Terra Bella Driveo (Tent�.tive Map - first he�ring continued, V�riance - First Hearing). matters Commissioner Puetz moved Commissioner Irwin seconded and it was passed combined unanimously to combine the h�aring of both m�,tterso Mr. Tom Henderson, Civil Engineer, made the presentat�on and stated that, present- according to staff requests, an �.cldition�.l 20' "neck h�d been added to ation Parcel A, which would give direct access to Linc�y Lane from the property. �Senior Planner Laurin showed tr�nsp�,rane�.es of two �l�ernative sketches �for the public road(s) branchin� off from Lindy Lane, whi�h would be �necessary to develop the �.rea as re�oned by 19-�-67. On� alternative planner included one street with an �.verage grade of. 17°,� and would inuolve Lot 4 shows indirectly (or possibly dix°ectly �s a result of a detail�d study)o The transpa- other alternative included one 15°�o str�et and one 20 str°eet, would rancies require heavier �ra3ing (up to 20 feet at one point� but would not involve lots �+ and 29. Mr. Laurin maintained �hat t�e choice between the two road systems may in reality �a.de by the decisions on the applic�tions now before this Commission, but that he had no preference, a� Public Works did not ob�ect to the second alternati�re. The driveway throu�h Pa�rcel B to P�rc�l A of ?�ot 4 was then discuss�da access dis- Commissioner Irwin questioned if, with the proposecl grading, fire trucks cussed could get in and out, and stated that this Commission wou�.� be remiss in its duties if it would not insure the fire dep�,rtm�nt'� access to any hillside developmente City Engineer Boyd emphasized tha�t th� standards, a� outlined by two letters from the Fire Department to the City, had been misinterpreted not only by letters him but also by the local news mediao Mr. Boyd said t�at he had had sub- defined sequent meetin�s with the Fire Chief who told h3m �th�,� the standards sug�ested were meant as recomm�ndations �.nd were not req,rzestsm Further, that the Fire Dep�,rtment h�d stancl�.rd �rehicles whic� will pull a 22°�, grade easily if it has � surface on which it c�n travelo Once the equipment gets �o the point of clestination it has t� be �e1d on a turnaround less steep and a minimum of a�+2 ft�o inner curb radius is requiredo Mre Boyd also reportecl that the City staff ancl t�e Fire Department are prepara- independently preparing � set of �t�.ndards whic� when combined, could tion of either be included in an existin� Ordinance or be �zsed to initiate a standards new City Ordinance a It wa,s NI�° o Boyd 9 s���.tement t�a� t�he Fir� Department was satisfied that they can pull. their equipment up to °�he d�velopment under discussion and that everything w�s in accordance with their needs and requirementse Minutes of thE Planning Commi�sion Jan����y 27 i9�9 PC-2 80,000.4 29-TM-68/1-V-69 cont'd Pa�e 3 Chairman Frolich read a portion of t�e City Council min�tes whereby minutes the application was �pp�ov�d ��t� th� �xe���ion af P�rcel 4 from t�e read Tentative Map requir�ment of �edi�a�ing t�� priv�t� ro�3w�yo City Attorney Anderson stated that the ques�ion befo�e ��is Commission is whether or not to accept the 20�0 �radin�, parti�ularly in u�ew of statement the fact that the Fire Departm�nt sp�eific�lly �t�ted � n��� �o� a 15� by counsel grade and sugge��ed that, unless a��un� mar.�ate from ��e Fir� Dep�rtment is obtained, thi� Commission mu�t work with t�e rule� i� ��s befo�e i�. ` Chairman Frolich called for audience comm�ent�e call to commeni Mrs. Juanita McLaren of 22101 Lind.y L�ne Cupertino oppo��d any restrict- ions on the division of Lot �+s opposition Chairman Frolich stated that th� r��,� p�,ttern h�d not been �et thus f�.r and that any opposition might b� pr�m�,��z�°� at t�is pointa statement Mr. T. E. Schmidt �sked �he City Att�rn�y� if +�e �ity �roul� h�,v� the ri�ht to condemn hi� property for ar�y future pz°oposed street�o Attorney audience Anderson, stating th�t there had be�n p�°euious litiga.tion with Mr. question Schmidt, reftiised to answer. Commissioner Puetz mo�red., Commissioner �rwin seconded and it was passed p.h. unanimously to clo�e the p�ublic h��,rin�e closed City Attorney Anderson clarified the t�� City's Ordinance reguires that the Fire Department �be advised of �. Ten��tive Map °�efore thi� bodye The Fire Ma.rshal has written two letters to d�.t� and it was doubtful that attorney's anything additional would be receivedo Attorney Anderson said that, if advice this Commission feels th�t insufficient �.�sur�,nce of fire protection is available, this applicatioz s�2�uld be deniedo � Director of Public Works Finne�r stated that �he Tentative M�p had pre- a viously been approved sub�ect to a��,tisfactory �olution being found, and proposed the approv�,l of the Tent�ti.ve M�..p for t:3m�"s sake indicating staff that this application would yet� �ave to meet t,�ie s�ringen°t s�t�nd�rds comments set by H Control prior to havin� �, b�.il.ding p�:�°m�°� i�su��s Commissioner Hirshon commented t�a.t �e w�.� not opposed �o hasten the issue along but voiced deep concern for having ta �,pprov� �. situation he did not fe�l wa� safe o Tie said tl�at he h�,d f°ull con�°id.ence in the commissioner's staff's statements that all problem� would be wor�ed r��°t 9 but insisted statements that the area be prot�cted; in lieu of sueh to��.l. as�ur�,nce he would prefer to continue the applic�.tion a� Y�e was not prep�,red to delegate the responsibility for the matter to the staff or the Fire Department. City Engineer Boyd reiterated tha� t�e 1.�t°ter �'rom �2�e F�re Department � showed optimums �nd recommendation� onl�r, nc�� to be confused with re- quirements. Also that, befo�°e t�e �pplic�.n�t wa.s allowed anythin� further staff on the Tentative Map, he would be r�quired tcs bring clefinite pl�.ns from report the Fire Depas�tment as wel� �� gr�.ding p�a.ns t� tk�e Ci�y staff e page � Minutes of the Planning Cottun�ssion Janu�ry 27, 196� PC-2 80,000.� 29-TM-68/1-V-69 contg� 1-V-6 Commissioner Puetz moved to �pprove Applica�ion 1mV-69, �x�mptin� Lot approved No. � from Condition 13 of Plann�n� Comm��sion Re�o�u�ion �68 which with condition requests that a Tent�tive Map coverin� the �ntire area must condi be submitted p�ior to any lot splite Commissione� Irwin �econded, tions Ayes: Commissioners Irwin, Hi�shon Buthenuth, Puet�, Frolich Noes: None Absent: None 2g-2'r�-68 Commissioner Puetz moved to approve fipplieation 29-�M�68 su�ject to the approved l� Standard Conditions �� previously resalved by Res�lution No. 468, with the additional condition that acc�ss for fire equipment b� r�solved with the Fire Department prio� to th� is�uance of a building permit. Commissioner Irwin secondedo Ayes: Commissioners Is°win Hirs�on, Bu�henut�, Puetz, Frolich Noes: None Ab sent: None 1-TM-6� D. 1-TM- Sutter Hill De�el�pm�nt Gompany; Ten�a�ive Map (Lot le�end Split), 25 acres located �out�east corner of �ome�t�ad �nd Stelling Roads> present- Mr. De�er Al�ren, the Givil En�ine�r for the pro��c� made �he present- ation ation. �Senior Planner L�urin reported that no major problems existed but that a few adjustments would need to be made; l� the boundary along Homestead Road staff would need a 3 dedication and �mpro�ement; 2) t�e d�dic�tion �nd improve- report ment along Stelling Road should be 29 instead of 25' and 20'; 3) that a revised map be delivered to staff prior to bein� presented to the City �Council. staff �City Engineer Boyd cl�.rified. that �11 parcels in a property �hould have a lot suggest= number if the parcels �,re to be subdivided and not, �� in this case, be ion labeled 9° not a part of this subdivision o ,There were no auclience comment�e p. h.. Commissioner Hirshon moved� Commi�sioner Irwin second�d �,nd it w�.s passed closed unanimously to clos� �lae pulblic hea�°ing. 1�TM-6 Commissioner Hirshon moved to �pprove Application 1-TM-69 sub�ect to the approved� 12 Standard Condition� with the additional con�.itimn 1�� that the revised with �map shall show dedic�,tion for Hom�stead Road te� �5' frcm the center line condi- �instead of 42°; l�+) that the dedication for Stel�.ing Road shall be 29' tions �instead of the indic�ted 25 �,rid 20'; 15� that �. 15' easement be shown �on the northeast corner along the ea�terly b��und�.ry line to provide access to the City of Cupertino we1�➢ �.6) that this revis�d map shall be flaxnished to the staff not later than J'anuary 30� 196g if it is to �appear on the next City Council agenda. Commissioner Pu�tz seconded. °Ayesm Commissioners Irwin� Hirshon, Buthenuth� Puetz F'rolich � Noes: None r Absente None � Minutes of �he Planning ��mmi�sion ��rnz�.� ��7� �.g�9 PC-2 80, 004 . �+ Pa�e 5 Chairma.n Frolich ca�:Y.ed �, r°eces� �,t 90�+5 p.md. The meeting �ecanvened �.t 90 1�•�� ¢ ti E. 1-U- Buck N�rr�d; iJ�e Permit to �,�.1o�r � riding st�°ble for �1-U-69 twenty horses y locat�d �,t, 10850 �teven5 C�.n��n Ro�,cl � � legend Mr. Buck Norred presented th� �ppli��.tion �nc� �xpl.�.in�c� th�t the �present- conditions suggested by �taff �rere ���.san�b�� and tl�at '�e w�,s in ; ation agreement with anything �h�t would pey°mit �im to op�rate h�s vent�zre. � Mr. Norred �,1so s�,icl. th�t twenty h�s�s��s w�r� �e�,n� k�pt in �. two acre parcel of land and that this �r�,� �, �t�bling faei.�i�t�r, not a pasture, and that no horses are b�ing boa�°�l�d and �,li are in �, eorrall. The staff reported. that an ex�c�t property �ine w�s r�quirec� to define the p�°operty under lea�� �ncl th�� of t�e les���° Mr�. Ke�te�°. Questio�� were �,sked r�l��ive to th� �,pplicant re�,�o�s �r�y this questions operation should be exemgt from th� Ag���u�.�ur�lm�e�i��nt��.i �Al� Ordinance which requires �, �i�t�.nce of 100 f�e� e Senior Planner Ioaurin r�ported that tk�is �.o°� w�.� �oned Ag��.cultural- Recreational (A-ua) and that tk��� Planning Commi�sion can impo�e any width of buffer ax°ea as wel.l as ot��r condit�ons o Mr. Norrec� ex- statements plained that the parking f�cili�ie� backed. up ag�ins� t�rie �duthern- most fence and that the entire 2macre �it� wa� u°�i�.iz�d as a corr�ll. � In calling for �udience camment� 9 Cha%�°man �'�°o].ich c�.ut�on�d th�t all ' call for statements ��ould be b�°ief° axid t;o the point and °t��.� repet,itions comments should be avoided. Messrs. Warren Weintraub of 22384 Riversicle �ri.�� �.a1d Ray Beasley of Riverside Drive, both stated t�at the co�°rall wa� w�°t�in inches of their property 1ine; t�a� t1�e odo�° ��pecial�y dur°ing t:he su�uner months, w�.s unbear�ble to ��ueh �n �xt�n� �that sw�nmin� pool facili- audience ties could not be utilized; th�,t th� aceum�].ati�on o� manure w�.s complaints bad enough and m���t be a�.11i�i�ted by a promi�e of d�i1y collection but that this wou].d. not so1�e th� probZ�m �f the liq�.id� �ener�.ted from the horses �� wel.� �,s dxainage prob�ems, �c��° th� flies �nd mosqui:tos menace or °th� bre�ding graund. f�r �°a �nd mie�. Mrs. Stel.l� Kester said tha,t �he wo�k�d on - t�� ranch and l�ved every minute of it, and if anyone shoul.� compl�,�� �b�ut in�uff�.cient drain- rebuff to age it would be Mrs. Ke�t�� a,s �,�� �g�.�la�� f°�°om �wi.mming pools and complaints other accumulated ].iqu�,ds dx �in�sl �nt4 �xer property. I�i�°� o Kes�er also related tha�t there were sever�l �.r��,� c�' d�s�.gr�ement betwe�n herself and the lessee, one of whic� �ra� �the existence of the barns on her property. Mrs o Ke�tex° maint�.in�d �hat ��e �ant��. t�ose b�.rns removed differences to affordthe� b�s� possibl� view f�r �e�°��lf �nd '�.er ��ig�bors . cited page 6 Minutes of" the p�anr�ing Co7riunis�ion e:��.�^aar�;� �'�?� �g�,� PC-2 80, 000 . �+ 1-U-69 cont�d There was an audience que�tion relative to thE possibi�ity of spraying questions the corrall to keep od�rs �.nd flies �t a mininum in �,d�.ition to the daily collection of manure. Mr. Stephen Kav�,nau�'h from the County Health Dep�.rtment stated that he county re- had not, since the present owner �,ssumed the 1e�.se, received any complai.nts present- about the opera��on and that the Heal.th Department makes periodic checks ative in intervals of �t least once a mont,h. �Th� Commissioners ask�d that they be supplied with a eopy of the s°�por�� should this iTse Permi� be granted. Messrs. Gerald l�oore of 22306 De Anz�, Circles Ro�t Johnson c�f 22�+03 Riverside definitions Drive; and Norman Bradley of 223�+�+ Ri�rers�de Driv� all asked :f'or defini- asked tions of statements ma,de by tY.e �,pplic�,nt a� w�ll as tkae representative from the County Health Department, and s��ted t�eir oppositior.i to the operation. Mrs. Jennie Anderson, a member of th� audience, st�.t�;d tk�at she w�s using the facilities of the ridin� stable, th�t th�� �a�s a healthy recreation not only for herself but also for �er children, t��� ��he �.pplic�.nt was support of new in the area �,nd not aware of th� things needed tc make for a success- venture ful operation, and th�.t the very least tk�e Commissioners as wel.l as the citizens could do, would be to �ive this man a ch�„nc� to put his sound knowledge of horses and riding operations to workm Mr. Norred, in rebutting the opposing auclienc� com��nts, emphasized that he was operating three other ridin� sta�les in Santa Clara Co�znty. Also, applicant's that he was operating simil�,r ventuz°es in Ari�ona under UoS. De��artment rebuttal of Agriculture permits and that �e hacl worke� closel.y with the Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Department, using the�.r facilities f�r riding purposesm Considerably more discussion en°ased amon� the Commis�ioners and audience questions were answerecl by staff. Commissioner Hirshon summarized the needs by stating tlzat in his opinion two basic matter� need to be needs resolved; 1) what is the prapr�°�istanc� accordin� to staff between the defined corrall and the fence, with particular emphasis on t�e f�.ct that ad- joining neighbors should not have to toler�.�e the ��.cr; �,nd 2) how many � horses are there on the s%te. Chairman Frolich agreed, adcling t�ie fol�.owing con�iderations which should be answered before this mat�ter can �e passed upono 1) that some buffer area be provided, possibly 20' of this including th� hed�e �f the pl�teau area; 2) the possibility of direct �ce�ss to the Cau.n�ty park9 3) provisions chairman's for daily manure r�moval; �+) f�i�� �,n�l mosquito� control; 5) some solution suggestions with re��.rd to the proper meth¢�d of controlling urine and manure drainage; 6) ascertain if the property owner is tailling to coopes°ate to that extent; 7) have the applican� submit � m�.p on � la�ge �c�.le s�howing the location of the barns and other stx°uctur�s9 8� �the ��e�r�� of the appla.c�nt's lease; 9) where on the property he would �rran�e for th� dr�inage; 10) should the application be approved subject to an �..nnual r��riewr this would in- clude the reviewr of tot�.l conformance to imposed con�lition� as well a review of complaints rec�ived from �,d�oinin� n�ighbors �nd adherence to Health Department rules. Minutes of the Planning Commis�ion ��nua�y �� Zg69 PC-2 80,000.4 1 cont°d page 7 Commissioner Puetz moved to continue Applica��on �-U- to �he next 1-U-69 regular meetin�, Commissioner Irwin seconded �nd it w�s passed continued unanimouslyo . Unfinished Business A. 28-U-67o Joseph Sileno; Requ�st fo� extens�on �� use P�rmit 28-U-67 for 100-unit apartment proj�ct in a planned d���lopment (P) legend zone. 6.227 acres loc�ted wes� �i�e �f Blaney A�enue, 350 feet south of Stevens Creek Boulev�rde Mr. David Smith of Goodwin Steinberg Associates Architects presented present- the application, representin� th� ownere ation City Engineer Boyd stated th�t meetin�s h�d been h�ld with the pro� � perty owners in that area to discuss the improvement of �hat portion of Blaney Avenue throu�h the dedication of 10' of roadway by the involved property ownerso Accordin� to Mr. Boyd, this �pplic�tion for renewal would be subject to dedic�tion of right of w�y at this , time; should the dedic�tions not be obt�ined or the City dismiss its �necessity to plans for the improvement of Bl�ney Avenue because of its inability �dedicate to obtain the necessary dedications t�e developer would �till be ;indicated required to construct improvements, �ut he would be �llowed to post � a bond or cash amount until such �ime as the other �onstruction commencesm The applicant stated that there were no objections to th�� req,uest. no protest Commissioner Hirshon moved that Application 28�U-67 be �a�ended for 28-U-67 one year and that,an addit�on�.l conciition be impo��d by which the extended applicant shall make av�,iiable for dedication the n�ces�ary ri�ht of for one way along Blaney Avenue a,t thi� tim� r�.ther than �.t �. l�ter timee year Commissioner Buthenuth secondede Ayeso Commi�sioners Irwin �Iir�hon Buthenuth Puet�, Frolich Noes: None Absento None B. 18-Z��$o Sutter Iiill Development Compan�r9 Development Plan 18-Z-68 required by Ordinanc� �+15 �.nd Planning Commi�sion Resolution legend 562, Cond, 13 336 munit �,p��°tm�nt complex located �outhe�.st corner of Iiomestead �„nd Stellin� Roads . Senior Planner I,aurin reported th�.t there were t�ro differ�ent develop- ment plans, for tY�e ap�,rtm�nt complex a,nd. for a e�mmerci�,l venture, which should be discussecl separatel�r; both plans were required by staff a condition to rezoning 18-Z-68o T�e 1a�,ter plari h�d been submitted report too late to appear on �he �.�enda but the �°taff has �tudi��. it and would be �.ble to submit oral report�. � � �� page 8 � Minutes of the Pzanning Comm��sion �anu�.ry �'7� �g�9 PC-2 80 , 000 . �+ 18 cont'd Mr. Anthony Me Guzzardo made the presentation �n�. exp���.ned the non-avail- proposed complex. He req�uested t�hat, �ince he w�,� no'� �iv�n any set ability of of standards by staff and had aceoz°�ingly proce�d.ed a� fa�° a� the workin� definite drawings with the plans, that subseq�u�nt �pplicants `b� p�r�mit,ted definite rules rules which they could fo].low elimin�ting num�rou� �n�i most].y costly reported changes in the working dr�wing s��.�ee It was NIz°a ��u�zardo contention that any requests for changes coulc� ��,sily b� worked out by �ound planning and a few minor adjustment�e � � City Engineer Boyd took exception to t�e stat�m�n� t���.t no �t�.ndards had staff , been made available by staff" a.nd �a,ici that My°. Guzzardo had neither refutes contacted his department nor the Public Works Dep�.rtment where he would statement have received all the needed assi�tance. Parking spaces were discussed and st�,ff stated that the parking provisions conditions as outlined were not in accordanee �rith the Ordinance requirements. Senior discussed Planner Laurin presented �. se� �f condition�, mainl.y intendecl to cover problems created by the proposed �.00p street being �. private road rather than a public street. Th� con3itions are �imilar tcs those imposed on ' the apartment pro�ect in �, planned. devP�.opment zone at� M�,ry Avenue (22-U-67); Mr. Guzzardo stated that they were �.ceept�.ble to him. apartment Commissioner Hirshon moved to approve t�e development plan for the apartment portion complex, subject to the cond.ition� proposed by the Pl�nning Department. approved Commissioner Irwin secondeel, , Ayes: Commissioners Irwin Hirshon �u�h�nuth, Puetz Frolich Noese None � Absent: None present- Mr. Jack Taylor with Sutter Hill D�velopments presented a development plan ation for the commercial portion of the area rezcaned by 18>Z-68, Mr. Laurin reported that this wa,� fo� a small shopping cent,er and that, staff at the discretion of the Plarulin� Commission, the commercial portion of report the application might be �,pprov�?d with the condition that �, revised plan be submitted to the Plannin� Dep�,rtm�nt including ehanges in street dedication and number of p�,rkin� �p�c�s � and th�t, t�a� Senior Pl�.nner be authorized to approve the re�i�ion. cominercial Commissioner Buthenuth moved that the comm�rcial p��°ti�on of Applic�,tion portion 18-Z-68 be approved, that essen�ia� minor ch�nge� �n ��e layout be pro- approved � vided for and submitted to the Senio�° Planner and th�,t this Commission � delegates the authority t,o the Senior Plaru��r to �,ppro�� these minor changes. Commissioner Irwin �econded. Ayesa Commissioners Irwin� Hirshon Buthenu�h, Pue�t� Frolich Noes: None Absent : None Senior Planner �aurin advised the Commissioners th�.t there wrould be,only reminder � one application in existence on the ��enda for th� nex' an�eting and � suggested that the study session for t1�e Light Indu�tri�l Ordinance be held at that time. Minutes of the Plannin� Commis�ion �an���y 27� �969 PC-2 80,000.� Unfinished Business cont'd page 9 Commissioner Buthenuth moved, Connnissio��r Pue�z �econded and it wa� discussions passed unanimously that the discussions of the Light Industri�l Ordi- scheduled nance be scheduled for the next regul�,r me��%ng-under "LTnf°�ni���d Business". There was no new businesse no new bus. Chairman Frolich declared the meeting a�lj�urn�cl �,� 1�005 �,,m, acljournment APPRO�'D o � r,� � ATTEST: ��/ Don�ld As Frolich PLANNING DEPARTr�NT Chairman ��� o���� Senior Planner