PC 01-13-69 CITY OF CUPERTINO� State of Californ�.�. .
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 9501�+
Phone: 252-4505 PC-1
80,000.4
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE�?P?�ANNING COMMISSION HELD
JANUARY 13, 1969 IN THE COUNCIL CHANIDERS� CITY HALI, CUPERTINO, CAL.
The meeting w�.s c�lled to order at 8005 p.m, by Chairm�n Frolich, who call to order
subsequently led the assemblage in t�e fl�g salutee fl�g sal�te
Commissioners paesento Irwin, Iiirshon, Buthenuth, Pue�z, Frolicho Also
presento Senior Planner Laurin; Asaist�.n� Planner Eng; Director of roll call
Public Works Finney; City Engineer Boyd, Recording Secr�tary Lucie Mo
Matzley, City Attorney Andersonm
Upon the motion by Commissioner Irwin and the second by Commissioner
Puetz, the minutes of the December 9, 1968 meeting of the Pl�nning minutes
Commission were approved as printed, with Commis�ioner Hirshon ab- approved
staining.
Senior Planner Laurin advised th�: Commi�sioners - that Applic�tion withdraw�.l
26-U-68, listed on tonight's a�enda h�d be�n withdr�.wna announced
Mr. Laurin also suggested that a�tudy session be scheduled to discuss
Ordinance 220(k), re�tulating Light Industrial (MIe) zoneso suggestion
Commissioner Irwin moved, Commissioner Buthenuth seconded and it was
passed unanimously to schedule a st,udy �es�ion for that purpo�e to be study session
held on Wednesday, January 22, 1g69 �t 7030 pom. scheduied
There were no written communications nor were there �ny comments from no communi-
the audiencea cations.
Public Hearings
A. 2�+-Z-68o Apostolic F�enteco�t�l Temple, Arthur Lind and Bell 2�+-Z-68
Mi�chell; Prezoning from R��idential single�f�mily 6 sq.ft. legend
lots (R1-6a County) to Gener�l Commercial (CG) �pproxima.tely
one-half acre located northeast corner of Or�nge Awenue and
Granada Streeto First He�ring_ eontinued.
Chairman Frolich explained that this application h�.d previously been
postponed in order to coordinate it with a revi�ed Gen�r�,l Plan for
"Old" Monta Vista, if possibleo There wrill be a public he�ring on delay
this revision before the City Council at t�neir m��tin� �on J�.nuary 20th_i explained
Chairman Frolich ��ked t�� applic�nt if Yse would be ��ree�.bl� to havin�
the prezonin� �.pplication continued to �. future me�ting; the reply
was affirmativeo
Commissioner Irwin moved Commi�sioner Buthenuth seconded and it U�as 2�+-Z-68
passed unanimously to continue Application 24-Z-68 to the next regular continued
meeting of the Plannin� Commissione �
page 2 Minutes of the Planning Commission January 13 1�69 80,000.�
PC-1
Public Hearings cont'd
16-U-68 B. 16-U-68: Sears, Roebuck and Company; Use Permit requesting approval
legend of design for store and automotive center, within a Planned Develop-
ment (P) zone, located northwest corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard
and Wolfe Road. First Hearing continued.
Mr. Edward R. Jones, Jr., Executive Architect of Charles Luckman Associates
present- of Los Angeles, made the presentation, stating that he was representing
ation Sears Roebuck and Company. He then introduced Mr. Niblack, who gave a
detailed explanation of the renderings and plot plans.
Mr. Niblack explained that the architecture had been designed in
such a fashion as to enhance and complement the Spanish architecture of
the area. According to the presentation, the roof was constructed of
design tile with a high parapet under which plaster was in evidence; and below
defined the tile roof would be concrete and stucco walls. Mr. Niblack emphasized
that the theme had been carried around the entire building, and carried
over to the columns as well as the automotive center and the gas pumps.
Upon a question by the Commissioners as to the difference between this
development and �.r�y other Sears ventures, the construction engineer for
specifics Sears, Roebuck and Company stated that this building wa.s unique not on3.y
relating to its size, 285�000 sq.ft., but also because the vertical lines
had been totally eliminated and only horizontal lines were in effect.
Mr. Niblack explained that the automotive center was proposed for a height
heights of 25 feet whereas the main building was designed for a height of �+7 feet.
discussed Also, that the requested traffic survey had not yet been completed because
of unforeseen delays, but that Sears was asking for the approval of the design
for i�he store and the automotive center, and that ever3rthing other than
that could be worked out after the traffic study had been completed and
submitted to the Planning Commission.
Senior Planner Laurin cautioned that the zoning permits a buildin� hei�ht
staff of not more than forty feet unless otherwise specifi.ed in the Use Permit.
cautions �. I,a,urin then read the conditions which had been placed against the
on height application at a previous hearing.
Discussion ensued relative to the egress and in�ress to the automotive
discuesion center. Staff reported that the traffic report would be beneficial to
of access both the Sears representatives as well as the City of Cupertino and that
there exists a possibility that certain facilities have to be relocated
to facilitate the traffic flow.
City Attorney Anderson cautioned that �n application should, either in part
counsel's or in its entirety, be approved or continued, statin� that conditions upon
caution the approval of an application hav� a tendency to confuse the issue and
delay the initiation of workin� drawings for the building under disc:us�ion�.
Discussion ensued on the possibility of granting the Use Permit for the store
discussion and to disregard the gas station until such time as the traffic study becomes
available. There was also discussion on the median strip proposed for
Stevens Creek Boulevard and Wolfe Road.
�
Minutes of the Planning Commis�ion January 13, 196a PC-1
80,000.�
Application 16-U-68 cont page 3
City Engineer Boyd sta+ed that th� on-site �ccess as shown on the
renderings was satisfactory �o his department, and that it w�s a simple
pattern and entirely feasible. It was Mr. Boyd recommendation that staff re-
the Use Permit for the store �e granted and to make the treatment of commends
Stevens Creek Boulevard and Wolfe Road subject to the approva� by tY��e method
Engineering Department.
When Chairman Frolich called for audience comments Mr°. Walter Ward,
General Mana�er of Vallco Park, stated that t�� plans had been dis-
cussed and accepted by the Vallco Park Rev�ew Board. Another member audience
of the audience had the exact location as pertains to the ad�oin�ng comments
subdivision explained by staff.
Co�issioner Buthenuth moved, Commissioner Irwin secdnded and it was p. h.
passed unanimously to close the public hearing. closed
Commissioner Buthenuth moved to approve Application 16-U-68 with all the 16-U-68
conditions which were imposed upon the original approval; with the approved
additional conditions 1) that the traffi� study be presented �to staff with
at a later time and that egress and ingress be sub�ect to approval by conditions
staff; 2� that the medi�n strip be made subject to appro�ral by the
Engineering Department; 3) that this approval is subject to the 12
Stand�.rd Conditions; 4) that the height of the main building shall be
as proposed on the plans, i.e. forty-seven feet. Commissioner Irwin g
seconded. �
Ayes: Commissioners Irwin, Hirshon Buthenuth, Puetz, Froli,h
Noes: None �
Absent: None �
C. 26-U-68: Noorudin Billawala and �iarold Provence; Use Permit. 26-U-68
This application had been withdrawn by the applicants. withdrawn
D. 25-Z-68t J. and M. Penna, Alic� N�i1 James 0`Gar�,, Jr., E.James 25-Z-68
McGuire, Kenneth and Arlyne Craighead; Prezoning from Resi- le�end
dential (County R1-10) ta Gen�r�l Commercial (CG) zone, approx-
imately �+ acres located east of Foothill Boulevard� west of
Palo Vista Road, south of Bellev�ze Avenue, north of Ramona
Avenue. First Hearin�.
Mr. James 0'Gaxa, one of the applicants, presented the application and
relatei that the engineering department h�d contacted the parties connected
with this application in an effort to combine several p�eces of land
to make for a larger site. Mr. 0'Gara said th�,t after some months plans
efforts had been successful and the rendering� showed the combined sites. presented
According to Mr. 0'Gara, the site lends its�lf to a small n�ighborhood
shopping center with a perimeter of stores on three sides and a large
parking lot in the middle.
page � Minutes of the Planning Commission January 13 i969 80,000
PC-1
Application 25 -Z-6� cont
Senior Planner Zaurin reported that the General Plan makes provision in
another location for a local commercial center serving the Foothill
Boulevard area which is zoned for a populatio, of some eleven thousand
people. The Planning Department proposed in 1966 that this center should
background be planned as a local community center including certain public and
cited semi-public buildings in addition to shops and offices; a concept quite
different from the strip-commercial type. This proposal and the present
application are mutually exclusive; the future population will not be
largc enou�h to support both. However, it is probably too late to
initiate moves toward the proposed local commur,ity center, especially
since part of that area is zoned R3, and there are indications that
developers are interested in the present zonin�.
need for Commissioner Puetz felt that the entire Monta Vista area needs a complete
more study and in-depth study, and that some agreement should be reached between the
expressed City of Cupertino and the County of Santa Clara for the best possible
way in which to develop this area.
no Mr. 0'Gara also presented letters from five adjoining property owners, all
opposition of which stated that there was no opposition to a development of the type
planned.
City Engineer Boyd commented that the �,pplicant and his associates had
commend- completed a commendable feat in that several property owners combined
ation their small size lots to a lar�e lot for greater effectiveness.
There were no comments from the audience.
P•h• Co�issioner Irwin moved, Commissioner Iiirshon seconded and it was passed
closed iznanimously to close the public hearin�.
25-z-68 Commissioner Irwin moved to �pprove Applieation 25-Z sub�ect to the
approved 12 Standard Conditions. Commissioner Buthenuth seconded.
Ayes: Commissioners Irwin, Hirshon, Buthenuth, Frolich
Noes: Commissioner Puetz
Absent: None
Commis sioner Puetz stated that his � vote had been based upon his
vote conviction that this entire area needs additional study before any type
defined of action can be taken.
26-Z-68 E. 26-Z-68: Mitzi Tawa and Edgar Selfy Prezoning from Residential
legend (County R1-10) to General Commercial (CG) zone. Approximately
• acre located northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Cupertino Road. First Hearing.
Mr. Fred Rhodes presented the plans and stated that he was representing
the present ownes° and purchasers. He explained that the site was presently
present- in the County and that annexation proceedings had been undertaken. Further,
ation that the plans for this small site provided for the construction of a
small co�unercial center, perhaps for a�rocery store or a beauty shop.
Minutes of the Planning Commission January 13, 196g PC-1
80,000.�
Application 26-Z-68 cont'd page 5
Considering the extremely small lot, Commissioner Hirshon queried if
attempts had been made to contact adjoining property owners with a
suggestion to combine sever�l smaller lots into one large size site. question
The applicant stated that, to his knowledge, this had not been done.
The City Engineer reported that this lot would be rendered smaller yet
because of necessary dedications for street improvement�. It was the staff comment
consensus that a possible approval of this application would, in fact,
allow commercial �pot-zoning.
When Chairman Frolich asked for audience comments, several audience
members addressed the Commissioners and voiced their apprehensions re- �audience
lative to the proposal as it would not only entail additional traffic comments
but that this entire area should be considered �s one entity rather than
in piece-meal.
Commissioner Hirshon moved, Commissioner Buthenuth seconded and it was p. h.
passed unanimously to close the public he�ring. closed
Based upon the considerations that 1) the lot size is such that it ma.kes
a good development impractical; 2) there should be additional study of consider-
the entire area; and 3) that it would take consider�ble coordination and ations listed
cooperation by the la_r3 owners in that vicinity before any decision
could be made, Commissioner Hirshon moved to deny Application 26-Z-68.
Commissioner Puetz seconded. �
Ayes: Commissioners Irwin� Hirshon, Buthenuth, Puetz, Frolich
Noes : T3one �
Absent: None
Chairman Frolich advised the applic�nt that he could appeal this decision right to-
to the City Council, within five days and in writing. appeal stated
Chairman Frolich called a recess at 9e�+5 p.m. recess
The meeting reconvened at 10:00 p.m.
F. 27-Z Manuel March�.nt; Rezoning from R1-20, A1-�+3 27-Z-68 and
and R1-7.; to Residenti�l sin�le-family 20,000 sq.ft. lots 2-TM�8
(R1-20) and Tentative Map. 1.22�+ aeres loc�ted on the north legend
side of Linc�y Lane approximately 100 feet west of Terra Bella
Drive. First Hearing.
Mr. Tom Henderson, Civil Engineer, presented the application stating that
this lot had presently three different zones within it which situation present-
would� upon approval of the rezoning, be cleared up. ation
Staff reported that there was no objection to the possible approval of
the rezoning, but that the Tentative Map should be continued as the request to
Public Works Department had not had an opportunity to review same and continue
su�gest possible alternatives. T.M.
pa�e 6 Minutes of the Planning Commission Jan��ry 13 196q 80,000.�
PC-1
Application 27-Z cont'd
City Engineer Boyd called attention to a letter received from the Fire
letter fro Marshal_ in connection with this application wherein certain conditions
fire have to be met prior to any further discussion. However accordin� to
maruhal Mr. Boyd, certain requirements have to be re•evaluated whenever the
cited development of thF hill area is undertaken, as not all Fire Department
requirements would be feasible.
Whm Chairman Fralich called for audience comments, Mrs. Juanita McLaren,
audience Realtor, asked for a clarification of thE listed acreage �nd received the
comments desired information. Mr. Noorudin Billawala stated tha� lot �+5 on the
�map had been exempted from all considerations at the original presentation.
p. h. Commissioner Irwin moved, Commissioner Buthenuth seconded and it was
closed passed unani.mously to close the public he�,ring.
27-Z-68 Commissioner Duthenuth moved to approve Application 27-Z subject to
approved the 12 Standard Conditions, with condition 13) that all prior conditions
for rezoning of Application 19-Z•67 be included as they effect this lot.
Commissioner Puetz seconded.
Ayes: Commissioners Irwin, Hirshon, Buthenuth, Puetz, Frolieh
Noes: None
Absent: None
2- TM_68 Commissioner Buthenuth moved that Application 29-TM be continued to
continued the next regular meeting. Commissioner Irwin seconded and it was passed
unani.mously.
28-TM-68 G. 28-TM-68: Edwaxd Cali; Tentative Map for shopping center.
legend Approximately 7.11 acres located northwest corner of McClellan
Road and Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road. First Hearing.
Mr. Tom Henderson, Civil En�ineer, presented the application.explaining
present- that the full plans were not being presented at this time and that only
ation the approval of the Tentative Ma.p was requested.
dis- Discussion ensued on whether division of property for the purpose of
cussion leasing only requires a Tentative M�.p.
City Engineer Boyd stated that the Neighborhood Plan for this area as
statement adopted showe� an east-west street along the property line from Terry
Way out to Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road, giving access to Parcel B.
applicant's Mr. Henderson stated that his client was most ad�nt in his request
opposition that he not be required to provide for the rdad out to Sunnyvale-Saratoga
Road; in fact, if this requirement were made by the Planning Commission,
the applicant would appeal the decision.
When Chairman Frolich called for audience comments, Mr. C. A. Moore of
103�+5 Paradise Drive, asked for clarification on the requirement of a:
audience masonry wall to be constructed between the shopping center and adjacent
inquiries residential area. Another audience member requested information relative
to the proximity of the development to the adjoining subdivision. All
inquiries were answered by staff.
Minutes of the Planning Commission January 13, 1�69 PC-1
80,000.�
page 7
Application 28-TM-68 cont'd
Commissioner Irwin moved, Commissioner Puetz seconded and it was passed p. h.
unanimously to close the public heaxing. closed
Commissioner Buthenuth moved to deny Application 28-TM-6�, Commissioner� 28-TM-68
Puetz seconded. � denied
s
Chairman Frolich reiterated the reasons for the denial by stating that �
the staff and the Commissioners feel that a road out to Sunnyvale-Sara-�
toga Road from the southern end of Terry Way is required and should be reasons for
dedicated by the applicant. Since the applicant is not willing to do denial
this� in fact, has stated that such requirement would be appealed, the defined
Commissioners felt the need to deny the application.
Ayes: Commissioners Irwin, Hirshon, Buthenuth, Puetz, Frolich roll call
Noes: None � on vote
Absent: None
Ckift�rman Froli�h�advised the appl�csnt of his right to �ppe�l to the right to
City Council within five days and in writing. appeal
There was no unfinished business, nor was there any new business. no business
The meeting was adjourned to a study session scheduled for Wednesday, adjourned
January 22, 1g69 at 7:30 p.m. upon the motion by Cormnissioner Buthenuth to study
and the second by Commissioner Puetz, which motion w�s pass�d unani- session
mously.
The meetin� adjourned at 11:10 p.m. adjournment
APPROVEDe
�
ATTEST: 1s/ Donald A. Frolich
�
Chairman �
PLANNING DEPARTMENT �
CX���.r' £
�� � �
Senior Planner �
€
r
r�
�
�
s
t