Reso 726 - 80,000.6
22-Z-69
24-TM-69
RESOLUTION N0. 726
OF THE PLANNING CON�fISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 130-UNIT APARTMENT
COMPLEX
APPLICANT: J. Cyril Johnson Investment Corporation
ADDRESS: 125 Willow Road, Menlo Park, California
SUBMITTED: December 19, 1969
LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Homestead Road,
500 feet west of Barranca Drive
ZONING: R3-2.2*da AREA: 8.15 acres
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONDITIONS:
1-12. Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the
special conditions enumerated herein. In the event a conflict does
exist the special conditions as enumerated herein shall apply.
13. The loop stre�t and internal driveways shall be constructed according
to the cross sections as shown in Exhibit B; said exhibit hereby is
made a part of this resc::.ution.
14. The pavement, curbs, gutters and storm drains of the loop street shall
be constructed to the standards of City streets, subject to the approval
of the City Engineer, except that the City Engineer may permit modifi-
cations recommended by a licensed engineer and subject to City inspection.
15. The loop street and the major walkways shall be lighted to an intensity
according to good engineering practices and standards for the purposes
intended; the type and location of electroliers subject to approval by
the Architectural and Site Approval Committee.
16. The 24-ft wide roadway of the loop street plus a 5-ft wide strip on
each side shall constitute a 34-ft wide public service easement; other
public service or utilities easements shall be incorporated in the
Development Plan.
17. There shall be a system for naming of the loop street or for address
numbers, subject to approval by the_Building Department, after con-
sultations with the Postmaster, the Central Fire District and the
County Communications Office.
18. City Ordinance No. 276 regulating parking of trailers, repairing
vehicles, etc. shall apply to the private loop street and to all bay
parking along said street. The parking of recreational vehicl.es such
as boats, trailers, etc. shall be prohibited throughout the entire
development unless said parking is within an enclosed structure.
Vehicular curb parking along the loop street shall be prohibited.
19. The owner of the development will be required to participate in the
-1-
80,000.6
22-Z-69
RESOLUTION N0. 725 (continued) 24-TM-69
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONDITIONS (continued)
19. initiation of a City Ordinance to make the loop streets subject-to
c'd the Vehicle Code, under the provisions of Section 21107.7 of said
Code; provisions of said Ordinance subject to approval of the en-
forcing agency.
20. Entrances to the development shall be designed so that the privat.e_.
nature of the streets is indicated.. There sha1L be-signs indirating
PRIVATE STREET, NO CURB PARKING, SPEED LIMIT 15 MPH; of.a type and_
in a location approved by the City Engineer. Subdivision indentifi-
cation signs and major directional signs shall be subject to approval
by the Architectural and Site Approval Committee.
21. Planting, care and removal of trees shall be sub�ect to City Ordi-
nance No. 125, as amended by Ordinance No. 407; except that existing
fruit trees may be retained, providing they are sprayed or.other.wise
handled to the satisfaction of the Building Official. Horizantal
and vertical clearance between trees and the roadway of the loop
street shall be the same as in public streets.
22. The developer shall construct a 6-ft masonry wall or other buffer
satisfactory to the Architectural and Site Approval Committee, along
all property lines where residential and industrial property abuts,
except where separated by Homestead Road.or Stevens Cr.eek. The
design of said wall shall be sub�ect to the �nnroval of the Archi-
tectural and Site Approval Committee.
23. The Development Plan demonstrated to the Planning Commission ���
December 22, 1969 shall be made a part of this Resolut�on as
Exhibit C. A revised Development P1an containing not more.than 130
dwelling units and conforming with a11.City ordinances and w�zh the
conditions of this Resolution.but.otherwise essentially_containing
the features.of Exhibit C shall be submitted to the Planning.Cam-
mission. No Grading or Building Permit shall be is.sued unless.and
until the Planning Commission has approved this revised Development
Plan.
24. In the event that the appl.icant shall desire to mak� auy c�::ange
alteration or amendment in the approved Development Pl.an, a writt.en
request and a revised Development Plan shall be submitted to the
City Planner.
If the City Planner makes a finding that the changes are minor and
do not affect the general appearance of the area or the interests
of owners of property within or adjoining the Development Area,
the City Planner may certify the change on the revised plan. If
such approval is withheld, the applicant may appeal to the Planning
Commission.
If changes are material, the City Planner shall submit the changes
-2-
� 80,000.6
22-Z-69
RESOLUTION N0. 726 (continued) 24-TM-69
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONDITIONS (continued)
%!. to the Planning Commission. If the change or changes are denie�
c'd by the Commission, the applicant may appeal to the City Council,
as provided in Ordinance 002(a) of the City of Cupertino.
25. If any of the conditions to this Resolution are violated, or if
private roads, driveways, parking areas, walkways, landscaping or
buildings are not maintained to applicable City standards, the City
may, after notice and public hearing such as set forth in Ordinance
002(a) Sec. 5.3, effect necessary maintenance, the cost therefor to
be a lien on the property.
26. The revised Development Plan as required by Condition No. 23 shall
be subject to the approval of the Central Fire District.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd. day of December, 1969 at a regular meeting
of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California,
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Frolich, Irwin, Puetz, Hirshon
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Buthenuth
APPROVED:
� `�\
-� � l� �..
�,�y Jack T. Hirshon, Chairman
ATTEST• Planning Commission
ames H. Sisk
Planning Director
-3-
��C N��j I j �I'�A A�.S. 4� � D D 5. I
��� � .'�� � f i �.a 1
��.�b5 ��G�'I ��*��',� Q �' �L1�'1 N�c�, � c�
- .._.....,....,..�.
JT � E�. � : � �.�i �1� �i,4 �
i ,�...,.... ...........+........�
�.r � �,,.r��%� ��Ti!.: e j f-..
. � � U fj..a � �� E C,� �,/ S � F- � �t � � � f�� f
,t..i ,. .. .� l�l� .. } J .
.� L.._,.e. --- _
_. � � ! 2 � y I 2.' S'
►� �.,
z �,
�
�..,._ � �... � -� _...._. �� _. . ��,
�
_�5� l2' 12` 5` 18� l`,
�
°'�,� � 4� . � � �,. .
� �� �-.— i � .; ,
a. �,� pa�. �. r �, ,
. ��� � �
_ _.� 4�
A✓' '�4f Y
� ` .. ..1�.__ ,,,_ ��.� ' .�. / . . .. �.�- �- �
2 � L� �� j � 2 � � Q� ��j I _ � Pj �� i,
r °� °� � -� *-�-
, � I C.
O f��. l p l� �' 1 G. � t� 1 �., -7 4� � t — �.�� 1 l� t Z L i rJ G
� �.�► �� �C:1 C� �C � I�� v �E�NJ�► `� � �
__ _� w., , -----•
_..�.._ _ �.
_.. _
,.._,.. . . _ ..
. _., . _ _ _. _ _ . �
_s�_. ..
�'O' i2,;5N - __� �Z �,► �8 2�
_ ,,, „o .-�
�4�4G�` r � � DPEt,.I �'At2tGtN4
_ _____ .._. . .. .. �'."'_. �_ �,,,
- � �+4 �.� � � � � �� �