Reso 713 80,000.6
9—V-6.9
RESOLUTION N0. 713
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING THE DENIAL OF A VARIANCE to reduce the
required number of parking spaces from 186 to 74.
APPLICANT: Mission Furniture Company
ADDRESS: 19875 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, Callrornia
SUBMITTED: September 12, 1969
LOCATION: Northerly side of Stevens Creek Boulevard, westerly
of Portal Avti�ue
ZONING: CG
FINUINGS:
1. That the appli�.�.��t `r :: :i>r ;��_=:T: th� r�r:�iecr ��f rL�cr, a5 outlined �5- the
zoning ordinance ta iustify the granting of. � variance.
2. That the applicant's furniture store is in a General Commercial zone
permitting a multitude of Yetail uses. A variance to reduce the number
of parking spaces for che htore's present use as a fu store
could result izi extxe�«ely � r�adequate parking should the biiilding convert
to a more general retail u,ye.
------------�--------- ----------------_----------------------------------------------
PASSED AND ADOPTED ti�is 24rh day �f November, 1969, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the C�ty o� Cupertino, State �f California, by the
following roli call v�te�
AYES: Commissioners Frolich, Irwin, Puetz, Hirshon
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Buthenuth
APPROVED:
c
�. J �
Jack T. Hirshon, Chairman
ATTEST: Planning Commission
�. !'.
James H. Sisk
Planning Director
C I T Y 0 F C U P E R T T N 0
City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 9501�
Telephone: (�08� 252-�505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING THE DENIAL OF A VARIANCE
WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a VARIANCE, as stated on Page 2, and
WHEREAS the applicant has NOT met the burden of proof required to
support his said application, and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission finds t�hat the application does NOT
meet all of the following requiremen�s:
l. That there are special conditions or exceptional characteristics
in the nature of the property to be affected, or that its loca-
tion or its surroundings are such as will permit the Commission
to make a determination that a literal enforcement of the Ordi-
nance would result in practical d.ifficulties or unnecessary hard-
ships; and
2. That the granting of the ap��ication is necessary for the pre-
servation and enjoymerit of substantial property rights; and
3. That the granting of the application will not materially affect
adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working
in the neighborhood of the property which is the subject of the
application, and that the use of said property in the manner
which it is proposed to b:e used will not be materially detri-
mental to the public welfare or injurious to the value of the
property or improvements located in sa�d surroundings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESGLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and other
evidence submitted in �his matter, the application for the VARIANCE
be, and the same is, hereby NOT recommended for approval to the City
Couric_t�� c�f. the �C�ty of Cupertino; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED.
That the findings quoted above and on Page 2 are approved and adopted,
and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to notify the
parties affected by this decision.
(Continued on Page 2�
-1-