Reso 648 80,000.6
3-V-69
RESOLUTION N0. 648
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING THE GR�,NTING OF A VARIANCE to reduce backyard
setback and backyard area, by permitting extension of
building within the area shown by dotted line on the ex-
hibit accompanying the application.
APPLICANTS: Kevin M. and Marjorie R. McCarthy
ADDRES$: 10490 Oakville Avenue, Cupertino, California
SUBMITTED: April 29, 19.69
LOCATION: 10490 Oakville �venue, Cupertino, California
ZONE: R1-10
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(continued from Page 1)
CONDITIONS AND FURTHER FINDINGS:
1-12 Standard Conditions, where applicable.
----------------------------------------------------------------
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of May, 1969, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Buthenuth, Puetz, Hirshon
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Commissione�s Frolich and Irwin
APPROVED:
�''`-__ �� •�
t---,-�t.�' � � --�-�
ATTEST• T. Hirshon, Chairman
� Planning Commission
�c�� ����
Adde Laurin
Senior Planner -1-
� 1'T Y ��? �� � Li� � E R'I� I l� 0
Ci�y Ha:11. :i0:�00 �I�orre Aver:�«e
�upertino, �alif`orn.ia a50.1��
�Tel.epr,one° (�Ot�; �j�_W�+�uS
RESOLU'�ION OF 'Z'I�E PLAlVNING COi�iNfl�rySION Ob� �'HF: CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMEI�TING `I'HE GRAN�I'II�TG GF A V��i=tIAP�CE
WHEREAS the Planni.ng Commisti,icn of tr�e City of Cupertino received
an appl.i��,tion f!�.r a VARIAI�Ti;E, a` stated on Page 2; and
WHEREAS the appl.icant h�,s m.e � t�r�.� burden of proof .required to
support• his said application; an.d.
WHEREAS �rie a,pplication �ho�v� o
1. 'I'rya� triE�e ar�e special �or��.itionc cr exceptional characteristics
in the nature of° the pr�perty t� be affECted, or that its loca-
tion or it� �ur^roun�ing� are su.ch a� �i11 permit the Commission
to m.ake �. determina�i�rl that� a literal enforcement of the
Ordinance would result in �ract.ical di�fic�.l'cies or unnecessary
hard.ships; and
2, 'I'hat th.e grantin.g of` tr�.e app:Lication is n.ecessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of su�;-tanti�.1 property rights; and
3, 'I�hat tr?e he�,rings show rhat tr�e gr�,r�tir:g of' the application
Zn�i11 not _md�eri�,lly d�fect adver�seZy the health or safety
of pex�son.s residing or� working in �he rleighborhood of the
pr�perty which is the sub�ec'r of the application, and that
�h� use �f° said px�oper°ty in the manr.Er in which it is pro-
posed to be used Tnli11 not be materiall� detrimental to the
public vae:lfdre �r in.jurious to the value of property or
improveznent� 1.ocated in :��..id surr�oundings;
NGW '�'HEREFORE, B� IT RE�SC�VE�°
Tl�.at �.fter� careful consider�.tinn �f° ma.p�, f°a,cts, exhibits and
oth.er� evidence su.bm.itted, ira t�hi� �riatter°� the application for
the VARIANCE be, an�. `che s�.me is here�y rECOmmended for approval
to the Cifiy Counc:il of` the Ci�y of Cuper�ino for appropriate
acti�r�� suk� ject to the conditions sta'ced or� Page 2; and
BE IT FUR'�HER RESOLVED a
'That trie aforemen.tioned f�ndi.ngs are �.pproved and adopted, and
tha,t the Secx�etary be� �.nd i� Yaereby� dir�ected to notify the
parties �.�fected �by this deci�ior.,
(Continued on Page 2)
m � ._.